Crypto World
Bithumb Prevails in Two Lawsuits Over Incorrect Bitcoin Credits
South Korean crypto exchange Bithumb has reportedly secured its first-instance court wins in two of four lawsuits aimed at recovering money from users who sold Bitcoin that was mistakenly credited to their accounts. The decisions, handed down by the Seoul Central District Court, mark another step in the exchange’s attempt to unwind a high-profile accounting error from February 2026.
According to a report by Chosun Biz, the court ruled in favor of Bithumb on Wednesday and Thursday in two separate cases. One decision covered a claim of 5 million won (about $3,600), while the other involved 194 million won (about $140,000). Two additional lawsuits—seeking roughly 14.8 million won (about $10,700) and 500 million won (about $362,000)—remain pending.
Key takeaways
- Bithumb won first-instance rulings in two lawsuits over alleged unjust enrichment tied to mistakenly credited Bitcoin balances.
- The court decisions relate to claims of 5 million won and 194 million won, while two other cases are still before the courts.
- Both cases reportedly proceeded through service by public notice because the exchange could not deliver documents to defendants via standard methods.
- The rulings support Bithumb’s broader recovery effort following its Feb. 6 promotional error involving 620,000 BTC.
- Separately, South Korea’s Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) has begun sanctions-related steps over the incident, though no final penalty has been announced.
Court wins follow Bithumb’s February crediting mistake
The dispute traces back to Bithumb’s February 6, 2026 promotional event, when the exchange intended to distribute rewards denominated in Korean won to a group of users. Cointelegraph previously reported that Bithumb confirmed the error after abnormal Bitcoin trades emerged following the promotion. The company said an employee mistakenly selected Bitcoin as the payment unit instead of Korean won, and credited customer accounts with 620,000 BTC.
At the time of the incident, the mistakenly credited Bitcoin was valued at more than $40 billion, according to the earlier reporting. Even though the amount was enormous on paper, Bithumb took steps to stop the fallout from spreading. Cointelegraph reported that Bithumb later stated it recovered 618,212 BTC (about 99.7% of the erroneously credited amount). However, some users had already converted part of the credited balances by selling 1,788 BTC before Bithumb froze the impacted accounts.
What the lawsuits are trying to recover
Rather than focusing exclusively on returning Bitcoin, the lawsuits reportedly sought cash proceeds derived from users’ sales of the credited funds. In March, Bithumb filed four unjust enrichment lawsuits against users who sold the mistakenly credited Bitcoin and did not return the proceeds, according to the earlier Cointelegraph coverage.
Chosun Biz’s latest report indicates that two cases have now reached first-instance outcomes favorable to Bithumb. The decisions cover different amounts—5 million won and 194 million won—suggesting the court is addressing specific user-by-user claims rather than issuing a single consolidated ruling for the entire promotional error.
The court also reportedly handled notice service via public notice in both cases. This occurred because standard methods for delivering documents were unsuccessful, meaning the procedural pathway relied on court-permitted service when defendants could not be reached through ordinary delivery attempts.
Bigger pressure on Bithumb from regulators
While the civil litigation moves through the courts, the exchange has also faced scrutiny from South Korea’s financial regulator. Cointelegraph previously reported that the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) investigated Bithumb over the February 6 incident—specifically how the exchange could end up crediting customers with Bitcoin it did not hold.
In that earlier coverage, it was reported that the FSS sent Bithumb an inspection opinion in early August, formally triggering sanctions proceedings. However, as of the time Cointelegraph reached out for an update, there was no announced final penalty. Cointelegraph said it approached the Financial Services Commission (FSC) for additional information but did not receive a response by publication.
The combination of civil court actions and the regulator’s sanctions track is notable for investors and users because it underscores how operational mistakes in crypto market infrastructure can escalate into both contractual/legal disputes and formal oversight measures. Even if Bithumb ultimately recovers most of the misplaced assets, authorities can still assess whether internal controls, monitoring systems, and payment/crediting processes were adequate.
Other legal and compliance challenges add complexity
The Bitcoin crediting error is not the only legal pressure Bithumb has encountered this year. Cointelegraph reported that South Korean police raided Bithumb’s offices in June as part of an unrelated investigation into alleged hiring favoritism involving lawmaker Kim Byung-ki. In addition, Bithumb has been challenging a separate six-month partial business suspension tied to Anti-Money Laundering violations, with a Seoul court temporarily blocking the suspension order in April pending a decision on Bithumb’s challenge.
Against that backdrop, the outcome of the user recovery lawsuits may influence how Bithumb manages risk and customer-facing processes going forward. A pattern of first-instance wins could strengthen the exchange’s position in remaining pending cases, while any reversals on appeal would likely reignite uncertainty around how these errors are treated legally and practically.
Readers should watch next for what happens in the two remaining lawsuits still pending, as well as whether the FSS sanctions process concludes with a specific penalty or additional guidance. The resolution of these cases will also matter for broader market confidence in exchange internal controls, especially in a jurisdiction where regulators have shown willingness to pursue sanctions after operational failures.
Your day-ahead look for Aug. 27, 2026
Park Hyeon-joo, Mirae Asset Financial Group’s founder, outlined his ambitious stablecoin, RWAs, and STOs plan for Digital X, formerly known as Korbit, in an event for his employees.
CYBERLEEK has given back a large share of its parabolic rally. Indeed, the token fell by nearly 60% right after the account behind the campaign posted footage of the game’s prologue.
The Solana meme coin ties directly to the Grand Theft Auto VI leaks. Now, it trades at 71.30% below its all-time high of $0.03436, reached on August 23.
Why the Bigger Leak Failed to Reverse the Slide
CyberLeek began circulating gameplay clips on August 18, days after the token itself went live. Early videos showed driving, flying, nightclubs, stores, radio stations, and map details from Leonida.
The clips were watermarked with QR codes pointing buyers toward the coin. Holders even used CYBERLEEK transfers to vote on which footage would drop next.
The token’s launch was not a coincidence. On-chain records show the project domain was registered on August 14, and the token first traded on August 15, while the first public leak arrived three days later.
That sequence, combined with buy prompts inside the videos, raised suspicion. Critics accused the campaign of functioning as a pump dressed up as a consumer protest. As a result, the market cap jumped from near zero to more than $20 million at the peak. Short-term gains, in fact, exceeded 1,400% during the frenzy.
On August 26, the leaker posted a roughly five-minute clip from a Lucia-focused prologue section, after earlier footage of Jason in a police chase that ended with a brief Lucia cutscene.
Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens.
That drop was billed as the first true story spoiler. It arrived the same day Rockstar Games broke its silence, calling the leaks “heartbreaking and unfortunate” while confirming that the Netflix Extended Look would still air as planned.
“…Many thought initially this would be a HUGE catalyst, and the Cyberleek team shared the ENTIRE prologue of one of the main characters from GTA6, however it did not move the needle…,” one analyst said on X.
What the Collapse Reveals About the Trade
The market did not treat the spoiler as fresh fuel. CYBERLEEK now trades at $0.006819, with a market cap of $4.99 million, according to CoinGecko data, 71.30% below its August 23 peak. The takedown of the project’s own website added fresh pressure, sparking what the exchange described as developer desperation and accelerating an already steep decline.
Classic meme coin mechanics, profit-taking after a listing-driven pump, collided with mounting legal pressure. Take-Two has sought subpoenas against Microsoft, Discord, and X to identify the source of the leaks.
CyberLeek has framed the leaks as a fight for physical discs, offline single-player access, and an end to locked fake DLC. Rockstar’s statement did not address those demands. Boxed copies of GTA VI are expected to contain a download code rather than a disc.
Consumer groups such as Stop Killing Games have rejected the leak tactic even while sharing some of the ownership concerns.
On the other hand, the official Extended Look airs on Netflix today, August 27, giving fans their first officially sanctioned look at the game after weeks of unauthorized leaks.
Subscribe to our YouTube channel to watch leaders and journalists provide expert insights.
Whether that footage ends the leak premium or merely gives traders another headline will determine whether CYBERLEEK’s collapse is a pause or the end of the trade.
The post GTA 6 Leak Coin CYBERLEEK Crashes Nearly 60% After Its Biggest Spoiler Yet appeared first on BeInCrypto.
How will other tech companies respond?
The settlement has an unusual quirk: Meta agreed to pay 70% of the settlement total—some $12.7 billion—over the next decade. But the remaining $5.3 billion is conditional, depending on whether YouTube and TikTok implement similar or more restrictive settings, including a one-hour daily time limit.
At a time when Meta faces fierce competition in the teen market from those competitors, the company is planning to run full-page print ads on Thursday in the The Washington Post, New York Times and the Los Angeles Times calling to make those settings the “new industry standard.” Neither TikTok nor Google, which owns YouTube, have commented.
In the past, tech companies have often copied one another’s safety policies. How competitors will respond to Meta’s settlement agreement is an open question.
What happens to similar cases focused on youth safety?
In addition to the action brought by state attorneys general, school districts and families have filed thousands of lawsuits against tech platforms including Meta, Google, Snap, and TikTok, alleging that the design of their products caused harmful consequences for teens. In March, a jury found Meta and YouTube’s product design led to the mental distress of a young woman, and ordered the companies to pay $4.2 million and $1.8 million in damages respectively.
Crypto World
Solana Votes on Plan to Cut $1.5 Billion in Future SOL Emissions: What It Means for Price?
Solana (SOL) validators are voting on two supply proposals. One would raise the disinflation rate, and the other would burn more SOL.
Together, they would reduce projected emissions by about $1.4 billion to $1.5 billion over six years. But what could that mean for Solana’s price? Other protocols may offer some precedent.
What Solana Is Voting On
Solana’s staking yield sits near 5.25%, drawing mainly from protocol inflation of about 3.78%. Transaction fees and maximal extractable value (MEV) supply the rest.
SGP-0002, which corresponds to the technical proposal SIMD-0550, proposes reducing the inflation schedule. This would be done by increasing the disinflation rate.
“It doubles Solana’s annual disinflation rate from -15% to -30%, compressing the timeline to Solana’s 1.5% terminal inflation rate from approximately 5.7 years to 2.8 years, reaching that level by H1 2029 rather than H1 2032,” 21Shares explained.
Under this, nominal staking yield falls to roughly 4.34% in the first year. It drops to 3% in year two and 2.25% in year three.
SGP-0003, based on SIMD-0553, would divide Solana’s current 5,000-lamport signature fee into two parts: a 2,500-lamport base inclusion fee paid to the block leader and a resource fee determined by requested compute units and the applicable resource fee rate, which would be burned.
“At current network activity, daily SOL burns would rise from approximately 600–800 SOL to approximately 7,500–9,000 SOL, or $712,500 to $855,000, as of August 24. It is a meaningful acceleration in supply destruction, though not sufficient alone to offset current inflation of roughly $4.5 million per day,” the blog added.
Voting is set to continue through epoch 1023. According to 21Shares, the two proposals could roughly halve staking yields within two years and make the asset “structurally scarcer.”
Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens
Ethereum and Cosmos Offer an Imperfect Comparison
21Shares pointed to two previous upgrades to gauge how markets could react to Solana’s supply-reduction proposals.
Cosmos’ (ATOM) Proposal 848 cut maximum inflation in November 2023. ATOM gained 25% over the following month and 10% over three months. However, the period also coincided with growing optimism around the approval of spot Bitcoin (BTC) ETFs.
Ethereum’s EIP-1559 introduced a burn mechanism in August 2021. ETH climbed 37% in one month and 60% over three months. However, broader market conditions also supported the rally as the crypto market approached its cycle peak.
The two examples suggest that supply-reduction upgrades can strengthen a token’s narrative. However, broader market conditions can have a larger influence on price.
“In both cases, the near-term move (1–3 months) likely came from a mix of the deflationary signal and supportive market conditions, not the upgrade alone. At the same time the subsequent 6–12 month drawdowns had little to do with the upgrades: for ETH, the onset of the 2022 bear market and the Fed beginning its rate hiking cycle; for ATOM, the broader summer 2024 slump,” the team added.
21Shares suggested that for SOL holders, the precedents offer a potentially bullish signal, but they do not guarantee a similar price reaction.
SOL trades near $101 after gaining close to 20% over the past week. The advance tracks a broader market rally rather than the governance vote itself.
Neither proposal alters the protocol on its own. Approval would hand developers a mandate, with the technical work and activation timing still to be settled.
That leaves two open questions for holders. Whether the changes reach mainnet and whether tighter supply extends the current rally will take months to answer.
Subscribe to our YouTube channel to watch leaders and journalists provide expert insights
The post Solana Votes on Plan to Cut $1.5 Billion in Future SOL Emissions: What It Means for Price? appeared first on BeInCrypto.
BeInCrypto has partnered with MetaQuotes, the company behind MetaTrader 4 and 5, the world’s most widely adopted retail trading platforms to bring curated crypto news directly to millions of traders, creating a unified experience across traditional and digital markets.
As crypto markets continue to intersect with forex and other traditional trading markets, traders are increasingly seeking insights beyond standard currency pairs and CFDs. With this partnership, traders using MetaTrader platforms can access relevant crypto news and analysis without leaving the tools they already trust for their daily trading activities.
“Crypto is no longer a separate conversation from traditional trading, it’s part of the same one” said Alena Afanaseva, CEO and Founder of BeInCrypto. “Partnering with MetaQuotes puts our reporting where traders already are, on a platform they rely on every day. We hope this gives MetaTrader users a clearer view of what’s happening in digital assets and how it affects broader market movements.”
Under the terms of the agreement,BeInCrypto will syndicate news across MetaQuotes’ platform and content portal metatraders.com.
The partnership reflects a broader trend in the financial industry with the convergence of traditional and digital markets. As more investors explore digital assets alongside conventional portfolios, access to reliable and timely news becomes a critical advantage. By working together, we are positioning users to navigate both markets with confidence.
Readers and traders can now access the latest updates by visiting beincrypto.com and metaquotes.net
BeInCrypto is part of the BeInNews Group, an independent media group covering the convergence of finance and digital assets. We help professionals act with confidence in a complex and fast-changing industry through our newsroom, research reports, events, expert network and multimedia studio.
The post BeInCrypto Partners with MetaQuotes to Bring Crypto News to Millions of Traders appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Bitcoin is testing its largest supply cluster alongside the key 50-week moving average.
The primary cryptocurrency once again jumped above $80,000 earlier today, reinforcing the view that the resurgence could be the start of a full-blown bull market.
However, some industry participants warned that unless BTC clears crucial resistance zones, it remains at risk of sliding back all the way down to $50,000.
The Necessary Conditions
Bitcoin has been on an evident uptrend over the past several days, with its price climbing by 15% on a weekly scale. At one point, it surpassed $81,000, with the catalysts behind that rally detailed in our article here. As of press time, the asset trades at around $79,600 (per CoinGecko), while its market capitalization has soared past $1.6 trillion.
Despite the positive performance and prevailing optimism, the analyst known as Gerla on X issued a note of caution. He believes BTC’s price must make a clean break above $82,000 to change the bearish structure.
“Until then, I wouldn’t rule out a deeper move below the $58K-$60K zone before the real breakout,” the analyst added.
X user cyclop joined with a similar thesis. They claimed that if BTC fails to hold above $83,000, “we’re still in a bear trend.” Should that happen, the analyst expects a dump toward $50,000 by November.
Other analysts who recently made bearish predictions include AlejandroBTC and Nonzee. The former argued that BTC faces a major downturn ahead that could take its valuation as low as $40,000, while the latter opined that the asset’s surge was triggered by a liquidity squeeze and envisioned an eventual crash to $45,000.
The Opposite Theory
The analytics firm CryptoQuant also analyzed BTC’s recent performance. In fact, eight of its ten market indicators (including its bull score) have entered bullish territory, suggesting that the current conditions may represent the early phase of a major rally. At the same time, the company noted that BTC needs a daily close above its 365-day moving average (around $83,000) for confirmation.
X user Gordon did not mention any obstacles, simply declaring that the bear market is over. He congratulated investors who bought BTC at $60,000, claiming that the rest are still early anyway.
Certain signals, including the amount of Bitcoin stored on exchanges, support the bullish outlook. Data show that, despite the price increase, investors have been abandoning centralized platforms in favor of self-custody methods over the last several days, thereby reducing immediate selling pressure.
The post Bitcoin Isn’t Out of Danger Yet: BTC Must Clear These Crucial Levels appeared first on CryptoPotato.
Bitcoin’s push to reclaim the $80,000 area is running into a familiar problem: overhead liquidity. New on-chain research from Glassnode suggests that the path higher is likely to be tested by long-term holders and fresh sell-side supply clustered between roughly $81,000 and $86,000.
While bulls may want $80,000 to act as support, Glassnode’s latest The Week Onchain analysis argues that the more difficult hurdle may arrive closer to $83,000—where long-term holders who bought through a prior drawdown could face an incentive to sell near breakeven.
Key takeaways
- Glassnode identifies a dense long-term holder supply band between $83,000 and $86,000 that has persisted through a full drawdown cycle.
- Additional “ask” liquidity has reappeared on exchange order books in the same broader zone, potentially limiting upside momentum.
- Glassnode says multiple tracked overhead structures now overlap, placing recovery demand and selling pressure in the $81,000–$86,000 range.
- On the chart, several widely watched moving-average levels cluster around the current price area, reinforcing $80,000 as a resistance test.
Glassnode points to long-term holder supply under $86,000
In its latest edition of The Week Onchain, Glassnode flagged multiple pools of BTC that could be released back into the market if Bitcoin rises toward $86,000. The most notable segment is long-term holder (LTH) supply—coins held without selling for at least six months.
Glassnode’s analysis emphasizes that the first heavy supply structure sits in the $83,000–$86,000 region and is “effectively all” long-term holder supply that survived the prior drawdown. The key implication: if price reaches that band, it may test whether LTHs remain willing to hold rather than sell at or near breakeven.
“Above, the first heavy structure is $83K-86K…,” Glassnode wrote, describing how $83,000 would pressure the resolve of the LTH cohort not to sell at breakeven.
Exchange asks and “overhead shelves” reinforce the same resistance band
Beyond on-chain holder behavior, Glassnode also pointed to new sell-side liquidity appearing on exchange order books. According to the report, these re-laddered asks may not be intended to execute immediately; instead, their owners could be aiming to keep orders positioned above spot price should Bitcoin push higher.
Glassnode framed this as part of a broader stack of overlapping supply structures rather than a single isolated wall. It cited several elements across price ranges, including a “self-custody cost-basis shelf” starting around $80.8K, dealer-related “gamma” flipping negative near $82.3K, and a liquidation shelf extending to $86K. It also referenced a “patient-supply wall” filling the $83K–$86K area.
Most importantly for traders, Glassnode summarized that every overhead structure it tracks currently sits between $81,000 and $86,000—describing the band as where demand for recovery meets a concentrated test.
“Every overhead structure we track now sits between $81K and $86K; that band is where the recovery’s demand meets its test.”
Price action: multiple trend indicators converge near $80,000
On top of the on-chain supply picture, Glassnode’s discussion aligns with chart-level constraints around $80,000. The area has seen multiple trend lines converge, strengthening its role as a resistance hurdle.
According to TradingView data referenced in the article, Bitcoin’s 50-week and 100-week exponential moving averages (EMAs) currently sit at $77,353 and $78,485, respectively. The same dataset places Bitcoin’s 365-day volume-weighted average price (VWAP) around $82,600—another figure that sits relatively close to today’s decision zone.
That clustering matters because it can compress the market’s “decision space.” If price trades within or near multiple major averages while overhead liquidity remains intact, upside attempts can repeatedly meet sellers—particularly when they overlap with historical supply bands.
Why this matters for bulls: $80,000 may not be the final hurdle
Earlier reporting from Cointelegraph highlighted market skepticism about whether Bitcoin’s rebound would last, and noted calls for patience before declaring a durable trend shift. In particular, trader and analyst Rekt Capital stressed that Bitcoin needs to hold the 50-week EMA for longer before a meaningful change can be considered, with expectations for bearish market timing to continue until the end of 2026.
Read alongside Glassnode’s findings, that framing suggests bulls may need more than a single reclaim of $80,000. If the $81,000–$86,000 band truly concentrates both long-term holder supply and exchange ask liquidity, then any breakout may require sustained buyer demand to absorb supply—especially as price approaches the $83,000–$86,000 segment.
There’s also a timing asymmetry to consider. Once liquidity is already sitting overhead—particularly from long-term holders and re-laddered sell orders—upside can stall quickly if buyers fail to step in before the market reaches the highest-concentration area.
For readers watching the next phase, the key is whether Bitcoin can progress through the $81,000–$86,000 corridor without triggering a meaningful sell response from long-term holders and order-book liquidity. Until that’s clearer, $80,000 may remain less a floor than a gateway—one that leads into a narrower, harder test farther up.
Bitcoin (BTC) has struggled to flip $80,000 into support in recent days, but bulls’ real challenge is still to come, new research says.
Key points:
- Bitcoin long-term holders add to BTC price resistance below $86,000, Glassnode reveals.
- Buyer demand must overcome this area as Bitcoin struggles to advance beyond $80,000.
- Multiple key trend lines sit around spot price, increasing the implications of an eventual loss or reclaim.
Glassnode: Key overhead liquidity structures sit between $81,000 and $86,000
In the latest edition of its regular newsletter, The Week Onchain, crypto analytics platform Glassnode flagged multiple pools of coins that could be released into the market below $86,000.
Of particular interest are long-term holders (LTHs) — wallets holding BTC without selling for at least six months.
“Above, the first heavy structure is $83K-86K, and effectively all of it is long-term holder supply that has sat through the entire drawdown,” it wrote, predicting that reaching $83,000 would test the resolve of the LTH cohort not to sell at breakeven.
BTC supply distribution by wallet cohort. Source: Glassnode
In the same zone, new ask liquidity has appeared on exchange order books. Its owners, Glassnode notes, may not intend for their orders to be filled, instead aiming to stay above spot price should it rise further.
“The re-laddered asks join a stack of independent structure pointing at one zone. The first self-custody cost-basis shelf begins at $80.8K, dealer gamma flips negative at $82.3K, the surviving liquidation shelf runs to $86K, and the patient-supply wall fills $83K-86K,” it continued.
“Every overhead structure we track now sits between $81K and $86K; that band is where the recovery’s demand meets its test.”
BTC spot order-book heatmap. Source: Glassnode
Trend lines converge on a narrow BTC price corridor
The area around $80,000 has also seen multiple price trend lines converge, strengthening its status as a resistance hurdle.
Related: BTC RSI bullish divergence draws 2022 comparisons as analysis weighs new price trend
Bitcoin’s 50-week and 100-week exponential moving averages (EMAs) currently sit at $77,353 and $78,485, respectively, per data from TradingView. Additionally, Bitcoin’s 365-day volume-weighted average price (VWAP), a moving average that factors in volume, sits around $82,600.
BTC/USD one-day chart with 50-week, 100-week EMA; 365-day rolling VWAP. Source: Cointelegraph/TradingView
Previously, Cointelegraph reported on the skepticism of market participants over whether Bitcoin’s rapid rebound would endure. With regular bear market timing due to continue until the end of 2026, trader and analyst Rekt Capital stressed that price needs to hold the 50-week EMA for longer before a meaningful trend change can be considered.
How to fold down a pop-up tent in 60 seconds
Lawmakers seek probe into DOT’s decades-long airline passenger privacy lapse
Bitcoin experts prefer this defined-risk strategy for the next leg higher in prices
-
Fashion6 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Madewell – Corporette.com
-
Crypto World2 days agoSpaceX stock could rise 75% to $240, JPMorgan says
-
Business5 days agoMusk’s Tesla, SpaceX Confirm $16.8 Billion ‘Terafab’ Chip Plant as World’s Largest Building in Texas
-
Crypto World5 days agoanatomy of crypto’s biggest liquidation event since 2021
-
Crypto World2 days agoA $30 Billion AI Fund Implodes, Now the SEC Is Investigating Wall Street’s Role
-
Politics5 days ago6 months on, Irish renters crushed by effects of government housing bill
-
Crypto World1 day agoDid Trump Just Move SpaceX Stock With One Truth Social Post?
-
Business4 days agoMystery AI Model ‘Ox Alpha’ Draws Developers With Free Access as Chinese Lab Origins Remain Debated
-
NewsBeat5 days agoThe ‘Lucky Dip Gang’ causing carnage for clicks: After five thugs were killed speeding in the wrong direction on a motorway, GUY ADAMS investigates a sick new trend… and why police aren’t even allowed to pursue them
-
Business3 days agoModerna CEO warns China is pouring state money into mRNA technology
-
Business7 days agoFive Below: Kids Discount Retailer Reaps Rich Rewards
-
Crypto World6 days agoNvidia Stock Suffers Longest Losing Streak Since 2022: Will Q2 Earnings End It?
-
Business3 days agoNVIDIA Stock Drops Nearly 2 Percent to $210 on Seventh Losing Day Ahead of Critical AI Earnings
-
Sports4 days agoDeshaun Watson fires back at Browns fans after being booed: ‘It’s a disrespectful thing’
-
Business6 days agoUK firms in critical financial distress rise 9% to 53,756
-
Crypto World4 days agoGoogle Gemini AI Predicts Ethereum Could Become the Trade Retail Misses in 2026
-
Tech6 days agoUnitree’s New Superman Robot Claims to Outjump and Outrun Every Human, Usain Bolt Included
-
Crypto World7 days agoOptimism-funded team's deciding vote shifts $49 million in OP tokens away from users
-
Tech6 days agoFaster chip in a familiar form factor
-
Business5 days agoWill Tesla Stock Be Higher or Lower a Year From Now? Here’s What Wall Street Analysts Are Saying
You must be logged in to post a comment Login