The Chancellor was warned today that plans to shelve his own defence spending target were ‘akin to surrender’.
John Healey was branded a ‘sell out’, ‘hypocrite’ and accused of putting ‘welfare over warfare’ as it emerged he will delay setting a date for hitting 3 per cent of GDP on defence spending.
Critics said it raised fresh questions about Labour’s commitment to defence and security of the nation and warned it threatens to sour relations with Washington, which has been calling for greater spending among European allies for years.
Mr Healey resigned as Defence Secretary just two months ago under Sir Keir Starmer after the former Prime Minister’s military investment plan failed to commit to spending 3 per cent by 2030.
In his excoriating resignation letter, he accused the Treasury of being ‘unwilling’ to ‘commit the resources that the nation needs to defend the country’, adding: ‘I am certain that a headmark date for 3 per cent of GDP on defence in 2030 is what Britain must set.’
But today it emerged Mr Healey, appointed Chancellor by new PM Andy Burnham last month, won’t use his first Budget to officially set 2030 as the target date for reaching 3 per cent.
He will instead use next year’s spending review to set out the timetable.
Mr Healey was Defence Secretary under Sir Keir Starmer and resigned in June after the former Prime Minister’s Defence Investment Plan failed to commit to hitting the 3 per cent target by 2030
Andy Burnham posed for the cameras alongside Ukrainian premier Volodymyr Zelensky this week during a trip to Kyiv, pledging that NATO countries would do ‘everything we can’
Reform UK leader Nigel Farage said Mr Healey had ‘spent years styling himself as a champion of our military, yet the moment he gets his hands on the Treasury keys he betrays them’
Meanwhile, plans to tackle Britain’s bloated benefits bill also look set to be pushed back until next year at the earliest, potentially delaying the chance to save billions of pounds that could be poured into defence.
It comes despite the Kremlin warning this week that it could strike British military targets inside and outside Ukraine if Kyiv continues to fire long-range, UK-made cruise missiles into Russia.
The warning was the strongest direct threat yet to Britain over its military backing for Ukraine.
This week, CIA director John Ratcliffe also made a surprise trip to Moscow to warn the Kremlin against launching an attack in NATO territory amid growing fears Russia is looking to escalate its war.
And during a trip to Brussels on Thursday, the Pentagon’s policy chief Elbridge Colby said the US needed to see ‘major efforts to step up’ on defence spending among European allies, including the UK.
Mr Burnham posed for the cameras alongside Ukrainian premier Volodymyr Zelensky this week during a trip to Kyiv, pledging that NATO countries would do ‘everything we can’.
But critics tore into Mr Healey and the PM, who are scrambling for cash after Mr Burnham made a series of unfunded commitments after entering Downing Street last month.
Reform UK leader Nigel Farage told the Daily Mail: ‘Britain faces the most serious security threats in a generation, yet the Chancellor cannot even stick to the defence target that only weeks ago he was saying was essential.
‘John Healey spent years styling himself as a champion of our military, yet the moment he gets his hands on the Treasury keys he betrays them.
‘The first duty of any government is the defence of the realm. Labour has failed that test yet again.’
The Tories’ Shadow Defence Secretary, James Cartlidge, said: ‘With Russia ramping up its threats every day, the world has only got more dangerous since Mr Healey resigned two months ago.
Former head of the Army, General Lord Richard Dannatt, said it was ‘outrageous’ to shelve the 3 per cent target, adding it was ‘akin to surrender’
The Daily Mail’s Don’t Leave Britain Defenceless campaign has repeatedly highlighted shortages and weaknesses in the Armed Forces and has long been calling for an immediate rise in spending, increasing to at least 3 per cent by 2030
‘It is extraordinary that he is backtracking on the very pledge which sealed the fate of the last PM and opened the door of No 10 to Andy Burnham.
‘Burnham needs to do what Starmer could not and make the difficult decisions to fund 3 per cent.
‘Russia doesn’t work to Treasury timetables, and we can’t wait for a spending review to keep Britain safe.’
Shadow Armed Forces Minister, Mark Francois, added: ‘When the CIA Director has just flown to Moscow, supposedly to warn them off attacking NATO, behaviour like this is strategic madness.’
Former head of the Army, General Lord Richard Dannatt, said: ‘It is outrageous. Shelving the 3 per cent target is akin to surrender.’
Labour peer Lord West, a former First Sea Lord, said: ‘I would hope that Healey, having been the Defence Secretary, is sticking by his guns.
‘It would be extraordinary and very weird if he didn’t meet the things he resigned over.
‘For him to very bravely stand and be resolute about defence and resign, only to then get the job of Chancellor and say “well actually it’s not that important”, does seem a bit hypocritical.’
Former Tory Defence Secretary Sir Liam Fox said: ‘Even by the standards of this Labour government, this would be breathtaking hypocrisy.
‘And it’s clear under Labour that Britain is a country that will be more configured for welfare than warfare, even if that threatens our national security.
‘What message does it send to Putin if we’re unwilling to confront our own domestic spending problems, even if that puts our country at greater risk?’
Sir Gavin Williamson, another ex-Defence Secretary, added: ‘It’s absolutely shocking.
‘It’s all well and good for the PM to go off to Kyiv, offering additional support, but you have to back that up with the investment in terms of our defences.
‘Russia has said we’re a target and to have the naivety and the recklessness to actually then not do more to defend ourselves is a dereliction of duty.
‘It’s very disappointing if John’s going to sell out the Armed Forces as the price for him getting the job as Chancellor.’
Government insiders said Mr Healey’s first Budget would focus on filling a defence equipment funding gap of nearly £5billion left behind by Sir Keir, amounting to about £1.2billion a year.
But much bigger decisions on an uplift in defence spending will be delayed until a Treasury spending review next year, with one source claiming that was the ‘appropriate place to set that out’.
Mr Healey resigned as Sir Keir’s Defence Secretary in June after the ex-PM’s Defence Investment Plan (DIP) only projected spending to reach roughly 2.68 per cent of GDP by 2030.
Meanwhile, two reviews into the bloated welfare system, which Britain spends more than £330billion on, will not be completed until shortly before Mr Healey’s first Budget on October 28.
According to government sources, it means there is unlikely to be a major intervention on the cost of benefits and that ministers will wait until next year before bringing forward legislation.
One senior source said the PM could only sort ‘one big issue at a time’.
It comes despite the PM being under pressure to intervene on welfare amid warnings that without major changes the bill will hit £408.6billion – or 11 per cent of GDP – by 2030/31.
The 2030 target Mr Healey has previously pushed for was part of a wider NATO commitment to hit 3.5 per cent of GDP on defence spending by 2035.
Most NATO members signed up to the target at a summit in The Hague last June under pressure from US President Donald Trump.
The Institute for Fiscal Studies think-tank has said raising spending to 3 per cent in 2030 would cost an extra £10 billion a year in today’s terms.
Boosting spending further to 3.5 per cent of GDP would cost £25 billion compared with existing levels.
The Daily Mail’s Don’t Leave Britain Defenceless campaign has repeatedly highlighted shortages and weaknesses in the Armed Forces and has long been calling for an immediate rise in spending, increasing to at least 3 per cent by 2030.
In an interview with Sky News today, Mr Healey said fiscal discipline was the ‘first priority’ for any Chancellor.
A government spokesman added: ‘The first duty of government is to keep its citizens safe.
‘The prime minister and chancellor are committed to fully funding the Defence Investment Plan.
‘At the spending review we will set out a pathway to meet our Nato commitment of 3.5 per cent of GDP on defence by 2035 and will set a target date to hit 3 per cent on that path.’

You must be logged in to post a comment Login