LONDON — A prominent public relations expert says Meghan Markle stands to gain considerably more from a potential reconciliation with Kate Middleton than the Princess of Wales does, arguing that the two women’s vastly different public standing and future paths make any thaw between them significantly more valuable to the Duchess of Sussex.

PR expert Mark Borkowski, speaking to i News, said that regardless of what happens between the Sussexes and the rest of the royal family, Kate’s position remains secure given her status as the future queen consort. Borkowski’s comments come amid renewed speculation about the possibility of a thaw between the two sisters-in-law following Meghan and Prince Harry’s recent return to the United Kingdom with their two children.

The gap in public opinion between the two women remains substantial, according to a recent YouGov poll cited in the report. William and Kate currently hold the highest favorability ratings among members of the British royal family, with net approval scores of 60% and 61%, respectively. Harry and Meghan, by contrast, remain deeply unpopular with the British public, registering net favorability ratings of negative 25% and negative 43%, respectively.

According to Borkowski, that stark disparity in public perception is central to why a reconciliation would carry asymmetric value for the two women. He said Kate’s future within the royal family is already effectively guaranteed, regardless of whether any relationship with the Sussexes improves, since she remains on track to eventually become queen consort no matter the outcome.

Meghan’s situation, Borkowski argued, looks considerably different. He suggested that her broader personal ambition has always centered on making a meaningful impact, and that healing the rift with Kate could open doors currently closed to her. According to Borkowski, a reconciliation might allow Meghan to operate more freely across both the United Kingdom and the United States, a flexibility he noted Kate has never needed to consider given her fixed position within the royal institution.

Borkowski also raised the possibility that even informal acceptance back into royal circles, short of any formal return to official duties, could provide Meghan with a form of institutional credibility she currently lacks. He argued that this kind of acceptance could help her pursue the sort of influence and impact she has long sought, both in Britain and in the United States, opportunities he suggested a continued estrangement simply cannot provide.

“A reconciliation is worth more to Meghan,” Borkowski said, summarizing his view of how differently the two women’s public standing and future trajectories are shaped by the ongoing rift.

The timing of Borkowski’s comments adds another layer to the broader speculation surrounding the Sussexes’ return to Britain. According to the report, Harry has reportedly already been working quietly to rebuild his relationship with Kate specifically, even as tension is said to persist elsewhere within the broader royal family, particularly in his relationship with his brother, Prince William.

Borkowski’s analysis adds to a long and often contradictory stream of reporting and commentary surrounding the relationship between Meghan and Kate since the Sussexes stepped back from royal duties in 2020. Various royal commentators and outlets have offered competing characterizations of the relationship’s status over the years, ranging from claims that Kate had effectively “closed her mind” to reconciliation following the couple’s departure, to more recent suggestions that Kate has been actively seeking common ground with Meghan as part of a broader personal effort to find peace following her own cancer diagnosis and treatment.

One British journalist, Jennie Bond, previously told OK! Magazine that Kate had grown so hurt by Harry and Meghan’s actions after leaving the royal family that reconciliation seemed unlikely, describing how difficult it can be for someone from a close, united family, as she characterized Kate’s own upbringing, to fully understand how such an estrangement could occur. Other reporting has suggested a more hopeful trajectory, with some sources describing Kate as wanting the current year to represent a broader period of personal peace across multiple areas of her life, including her relationship with the Sussexes.

Royal commentator Hilary Fordwich has separately suggested that while Meghan has expressed genuine remorse over the state of the relationship and a desire for reconciliation, Kate may see limited benefit in repairing the bond given how far the relationship has deteriorated in the years since the Sussexes’ departure and their subsequent public criticisms of the royal family, including through their Oprah Winfrey interview, a Netflix docuseries and Harry’s memoir, “Spare.”

Neither Kensington Palace nor representatives for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex have publicly commented on Borkowski’s specific analysis or confirmed any active reconciliation discussions between Meghan and Kate. The palace has generally maintained a policy of not commenting publicly on the personal relationship dynamics between members of the royal family and the Sussexes since their 2020 departure from official duties.

Borkowski’s framing of the relationship in terms of asymmetric reputational stakes reflects a broader pattern within royal commentary, where PR and image-focused analysts have increasingly assessed the Sussexes’ various public moves, including interviews, media appearances and now their return to Britain, through the lens of strategic reputation management rather than purely personal or emotional considerations.

With Meghan and Harry now settled back in the United Kingdom alongside their children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, speculation over the future of Meghan’s relationship with Kate is likely to continue in the coming months, particularly as the family navigates other significant developments, including Prince George’s recent start at Eton College and the broader question of how visible a role, if any, the Sussexes will play in British public life going forward. For now, Borkowski’s analysis adds a distinctly strategic dimension to that ongoing speculation, framing any eventual reconciliation less as a matter of personal forgiveness and more as a calculation over whose public image and future opportunities stand to benefit most from repairing one of the royal family’s most closely watched personal rifts.

Not long ago, hand-drafted drawings, paper schedules, verbal progress reports, and manual budget tracking methods were the accepted modes of operation in the construction industry.

Of course, these manual processes also created lags in data transfer and communication that could render blueprints, reports, and other information sources obsolete upon arrival.

Thankfully, the complexity of today’s construction industry has been accompanied by advanced construction software tools capable of harnessing the wealth of available cost, schedule, safety, and quality data each project reveals. The value of this data depends not only on its breadth and accuracy, but on whether teams receive it while they can still act upon it.

Construction Doesn’t Have a Data Shortage

As anyone who has visited a modern construction site can tell you, there is no shortage of data to be collected and reviewed. Technologies like IoT sensors, mobile software apps, and cloud-based BIM platforms make data on task completion, schedule adherence, safety incidents, and countless other metrics available to us.

Unfortunately, the collection of data doesn’t guarantee it will reach the right audience at the right time. Key decisions related to construction budget management, procurement, and resource allocation rely on data that is both accurate and timely. The best software tools connect the dots between data sources and stakeholders, ensuring financial, quality, safety, or logistical issues are prioritized and addressed proactively.

The Difference Between Reporting a Problem and Preventing One

In data-rich cloud computing and network security realms, visibility is assessed based on recognition time. In other words, no amount of data can keep powerful applications running smoothly and securely unless it is interpreted and acted upon quickly. This highlights the difference between reporting vs preventing problems that is fundamental in construction.

For example, subfloor changes to address safety concerns mid-project can be integrated seamlessly when information flows quickly. However, even a modest delay between project phases can cause a chain reaction, with wasted materials, schedule conflicts between impacted trades, and expedite fees creating an expensive and time-consuming mess.

Data Silos Can Hide the Real Project Story

Construction data silos were once the result of physical distances. Today, they are frequently caused by differing priorities and perspectives: While a project manager sees a task conforming to schedule, a procurement specialist only sees the markups, return fees, and delivery premiums required to keep pace. Additional sources of data silos in construction include:

• Disconnected software platforms
• Localized spreadsheets and trackers
• Confidentiality concerns between stakeholders

Eliminating these silos helps to enhance the flow and value of construction data, with connected information helping teams understand how changes or problems in one area can directly impact others.

Useful Data Should Trigger Decisions

Establishing robust links between construction data and the experts who need it is just the first step. Project managers, quantity surveyors, and cost accountants can become overwhelmed by growing lists of metrics and KPIs, regardless of their importance. The best construction budget management tools transform timely data into real-time highlights that identify exceptions and emerging problems. This allows decision-makers to narrow their focus and concentrate on key risks and opportunities, taking action before financial, schedule, or safety issues multiply.

From Data Collection to Project Visibility

The road to optimized visibility begins with commitments to collect available data in real-time, break down siloes that impede the flow of information, and develop tools and systems that convert raw data into timely alerts and updates. While technology is a common (and necessary) ingredient, additional steps that help to complete this transformation include:

• Reducing reliance on traditional, retrospective reporting processes
• Establishing clear ownership for data collection, review, and sharing activities
• Focused training to improve data literacy project-wide

Conclusion

The construction industry has never been short on data, but establishing the systems and protocols to ensure useful data is available when needed is a next-level challenge. These advanced capabilities drive design, procurement, and financial decisions that define project success, along with the safety, sustainability, and logistical features of an evolved jobsite.

As construction software tools improve to expand data collection, the dissemination of information to decision-makers is equally important. The best project data does more than explain what went wrong. It gives teams enough time to keep it from going wrong in the first place.

LONDON — A British celebrity magazine said this week that Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex, hopes King Charles III will offer some public support for her lifestyle company, As Ever, as she and Prince Harry settle in Britain after years in California.

The claim, published by Closer and repeated by outlets including The News International, was attributed only to an unnamed “insider.” Neither Buckingham Palace nor representatives for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex confirmed it. There is no public statement from the king endorsing the brand, and no photograph or social-media comment of the kind the magazine described.

Closer quoted its source as saying Meghan still intends to treat As Ever as a central project while she also pursues acting work, and that she wants to test whether the products can sell in Britain. The same source said a joint photograph posted online, or even a brief kind remark from the king on one of her posts, “would mean the world.” Those lines have not been independently verified.

What can be established is the setting in which the rumor landed. Harry and Meghan returned to the United Kingdom in late August for what people close to them have described as an extended stay, not a full-time royal comeback. They have said they will live in a private home rather than an official royal residence and will keep running their own businesses. Their children have been enrolled in British schools. Page Six reported that the couple had been looking in the Cotswolds, near Highgrove House, the country home of the king and Queen Camilla.

That geography matters for the gossip. Highgrove already sells garden-related goods under the king’s long-running country-life brand. As Ever sells jams, honey, teas, candles and California wine. The overlap is enough for tabloids to invent a partnership. It is not evidence that one exists.

As Ever began as American Riviera Orchard and was relaunched under its current name in early 2025. The first public drop, in April 2025, included raspberry jam, herbal teas, wildflower honey and a cookie mix and sold out quickly. A Napa Valley rosé followed in July 2025. Netflix helped underwrite the first year, in tandem with Meghan’s lifestyle series “With Love, Meghan.” In March 2026 the companies said they would separate.

“As ever is grateful for Netflix’s partnership through launch and our first year,” a spokesperson for the brand said. “We have experienced meaningful and rapid growth and As ever is now ready to stand on its own.”

Netflix said the split had been planned. “Meghan’s passion for elevating everyday moments in beautiful yet simple ways inspired the creation of the As ever brand, and we are glad to have played a role in bringing that vision to life,” the company said. “As it was always intended, Meghan will continue growing the brand and take it into its next chapter independently.”

Meghan has described the line in her own words on the company site. “As ever, for me, is an extension of how I love,” she wrote. “Through thoughtful gestures and small details, I hope this collection brings you as much joy as it does for those I hold close.” When she announced the name change, she said “‘As ever’ means ‘as it’s always been’” and called the project an extension of the food, gardening and entertaining she had written about for years on her old blog, The Tig.

The New York Times reported in August that As Ever would remain a California-based brand sold in the United States even as the family packed up Montecito. That does not rule out a later British push. It does mean that, as of last month, the commercial plan on the record was continuity in America, not a palace-backed launch in Britain.

The family relationship with the king has thawed in public view without becoming a working-royal arrangement. Buckingham Palace confirmed that Charles, Camilla, Harry, Meghan, Archie and Lilibet met privately at Highgrove in July, the first time the king had seen his youngest grandchildren since 2022. Palace officials would not discuss the length or substance of the visit. People close to Charles said he wanted the gathering and wanted it kept private.

Earlier in the summer, celebrity magazines reported gift baskets and Instagram posts that included the king’s picture. Those accounts also relied on unnamed sources. What is visible on the public record is more limited: a reunion the palace acknowledged, a subsequent move to Britain the couple’s camp described as family-driven, and a brand that keeps shipping pantry goods and wine.

Harry and Meghan stepped back from official royal duties in 2020. Queen Elizabeth II rejected their request for a hybrid role, saying the monarchy was not a part-time job. They have not been invited back onto the working-royal roster. Their commercial work — Netflix projects, speeches, As Ever, Archewell — is the structure they built instead.

That structure is now sitting closer to the institution they left. Greater visibility in Britain could help a consumer brand. It could also reopen old arguments about mixing private profit with royal proximity. No palace rule requires the king to like a daughter-in-law’s jam. No brand statement has asked him to. The Closer story treats a hoped-for nod as a strategy. Without confirmation, it remains a magazine claim.

The political weather around the couple is mixed. President Donald Trump said on Sept. 2 that he was “glad” they had left the United States and that he “wouldn’t have taken them back” if he were king, calling Meghan “terribly disrespectful” to Elizabeth II and to Charles. Those remarks are on tape. They are not a palace policy.

For As Ever, the immediate work is more ordinary. After the Netflix split, the company has kept adding seasonal products: blackberry jam, spiced apple butter, a Reserve Brut described on Instagram as “a new chapter to celebrate.” The tone is hospitality, not heraldry.

Charles, 77, continues cancer treatment and a full official program. Meghan, 45, has been linked in entertainment reporting to possible acting work in Britain, including a rumored part in a Guy Ritchie series, while she remains the face of As Ever. Harry has said in past interviews that he wants a relationship with his father. None of those facts require a royal endorsement of a lifestyle label.

If the king ever did appear in a photograph with Meghan that the family then posted, or if he ever commented on an As Ever product, that would be news because it has not happened. Until someone on the record says it is planned, the responsible account is narrower: the Sussexes are in Britain, the brand is still selling, the palace has confirmed a private family meeting — and a celebrity magazine says she would like a public blessing that, so far, no official has offered.