Connect with us

Tech

What’s Going On With OpenAI And The Navier-Stokes Controversy?

Published

on

Artificial intelligence has solved a major mathematics problem, but credit for the accomplishment is murky.

OpenAI announced today that it has found a solution to the Navier-Stokes problem, one of the longest-standing puzzles in mathematics. It’s a major accomplishment, but the news has been marred by a debate over whether the company acted based on unpublished research from other parties. Additionally, OpenAI has been accused of attempting to influence who will receive credit for the achievement in publication.

Advertisement

The Navier-Stokes problem

First, some background. The Millennium Prize Problems are a group of seven complex questions established by the Clay Mathematics Institute in 2000. The organization is offering a reward of $1 million for solutions to each of these questions, all of which have stymied mathematicians for decades, if not centuries. Since the prize’s creation, only one of the other problems from the collection had previously been solved.

The Navier-Stokes problem centers on fluid dynamics, the rules for analyzing the behavior of both liquids and gasses. The angle that had been posed to mathematicians, in extreme layperson terms, is whether there are any edge cases where the original set of Navier-Stokes equations lead to results that cannot happen in reality.

Having a solution to a second Millennium Prize Problem is a massive accomplishment when it comes to applying artificial intelligence and large language models to solving some of the most perplexing quandaries in mathematics. However, the use of tools made by rival AI businesses in developing those solutions has created friction in the field regarding who gets to claim responsibility for the work and how.

Advertisement

The allegations

Tristan Buckmaster, a mathematician at New York University, and Levent Alpöge, a researcher employed at Anthropic but working in a personal capacity, had been developing their own solution and made use of multiple different LLMs in their efforts, including Anthropic Claude, OpenAI’s Codex tool and its Astra frontier model. According to a statement by Buckmaster, OpenAI may have doubled down on its efforts regarding Navier-Stokes after learning that a team including rival Anthropic was close to a solution. He questioned whether OpenAI had leveraged the work he and his colleague had done with Codex to obtain its own breakthrough.

“I asked whether the model had been trained on, or had access to, our sessions in Codex, into which we had been putting all our drafts for the whole of this project. I was told the model did not look up user data. I asked again, about training, and I did not get an answer,” the statement reads.

Buckmaster then said he spoke with Sebastien Bubeck, a mathematician and AI researcher at OpenAI, and another unnamed party and was offered two options for claiming credit for the work. One was to publish a partial development, with OpenAI to publish its Navier-Stokes solution the following day. The other was to write a solo paper that credited the use of an OpenAI LLM in the Navier-Stokes solution without the inclusion of Alpöge’s name. Buckmaster said he declined both proposals. 

Advertisement

Both Bubeck and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman have posted their versions of events to social media in response, with Bubeck specifically refuting the claim that he asked for Alpöge’s name to be removed from a paper. The announcement from OpenAI also stated that the company did not plan to claim the $1 million prize for its solution.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Tech

How To Use The AI Clean Up Tool In iOS 27 To Remove Unwanted Objects In iPhone Photos

Published

on

Remove those photobombers with even more accuracy than before.

Apple is adding a bunch of new AI features in iOS 27, with one of the most essential apps, Photos, getting some cool AI upgrades too. There’s one feature in particular that’s getting much better with iOS 27: Clean Up. This tool has been around since iOS 18 redesigned the Photos app, though it’s always lagged far behind its competitors. But thanks to Apple’s new AI models, Clean Up is now much better at removing objects from your photos.

Before you can use the upgraded Clean Up, your iPhone needs iOS 27. If you’ve already installed the update, the next step is to enable Apple Intelligence if it’s not already. That means you need an iPhone 15 Pro or later. If you have an older iPhone, you won’t be able to take advantage of this feature. 

Advertisement

Removing objects from your photos with Clean Up

If you’ve used Clean Up before, you’ll know where to find it in iOS 27. The difference is that it now has some extra controls. To start, choose a photo you want to adjust in the Photos app and tap the Edit button at the bottom. Select Tools and choose Clean Up. You’ll see an Auto button at the top, which lets you change the processing type. Leave this set to Auto to have your phone choose between the other two modes depending on how complex the image is. 

Fast retouches your photos with a smaller AI model. It gets the job done much faster, but it’s not ideal for more complex retouching. Say you have a photo of a landscape and you want to remove a trash can in the background. Or maybe you need to hide the wiring on the street lights. These are the kinds of edits that the Quick model is most likely to handle well.

But where Apple’s Clean Up feature has always struggled is with more complex edits. When there are a bunch of people behind you ruining your selfie, that’s where the High Quality option comes in. More advanced AI models can better understand the context of an image. But this improved processing comes at the cost of taking longer and using more battery.

Clean Up often tries to recognize unknown objects that you’ll want to remove from your photo. This doesn’t always work as it should, so it’s more accurate to circle what you want to remove.

Advertisement

Extending and reframing photos

For other cases where a photo didn’t come out like you intended, iOS 27 introduces two extra photo-editing features: Extend and Reframe. Extend uses AI to expand the area around your photo. Imagine you took a selfie, but it’s too close to your face. Extend can fix this by understanding the context to generate more of the image around it, filling in what’s already in the photo. Just pinch to zoom out as much as you want. It may take a while before you see the results, but that’s normal.

Reframe is different: it changes the perspective and angle from which you originally took the photo. For example, maybe you weren’t looking at the camera when the picture was taken. Reframe lets you change that without retaking the photo. The results are hit or miss, though. Some photos appear natural. Others end up looking like AI slop, with the model hallucinating objects or even people who weren’t originally there. It’s worth a try if you really don’t like the original photo, but don’t get your hopes up. Improving your smartphone photography in the first place should have better results.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Wind Turbines Are Becoming Safer For Birds: Here’s How

Published

on





Your average wind turbine has a far lengthier lifespan than the average bird, and yet it’s more than capable of cutting the bird’s life even shorter. Estimates for the United States alone say that wind turbines kill anywhere between a couple hundred thousand and over a million birds a year. It’s fair to assume that wind farms in other countries face similar challenges. Recently, however, there are real efforts to reduce these numbers, and at a handful of these sites, researchers have already watched it happen.

The oldest example is Altamont Pass, a run of grassland hills situated east of San Francisco where roughly 5,400 turbines went up starting in the 1960s. While these hills receive plenty of wind, they’re also famous for being one of the densest golden eagle nesting areas in North America. Enough birds have died here that environmental groups actually sued Alameda County. A 2007 settlement then committed the wind companies to halving turbine deaths among four raptor species. Since then, operators have pulled out many smaller individual turbines researchers had flagged as the worst killers and replaced them, project by project, with a few dozen larger ones that were placed more carefully.

Subsequently, ICF International, the consultancy Alameda County hired to count carcasses under those turbines, reported that the fatalities among those four species went down by roughly half. From this, the rest of the industry realized that the deadliest thing about a turbine is usually where somebody chose to put it up. But there are other factors, too.

Advertisement

Painting the blades to make them more visible to birds

But what if you can’t really move a turbine or replace it, simply because it’s expensive or because they are absolutely necessary? In that case, it becomes important to understand why birds — especially ones known for having incredibly sharp eyesight — keep crashing into these at all. A researcher at England’s University of Birmingham explains that large-eyed birds actually carry a blind patch above their heads. Their eyes are typically glued downward as they spend hours scanning the ground for prey. Things get worse for them when turbine blades are painted white or pale grey, a deliberate design choice to get the machines to vanish against the sky for nearby residents. It’s a case of design prioritizing people rather than wildlife, much like the serrated edges some wind turbine blades carry to soften their whooshing noise. Once these blades start spinning, they turn into a single translucent smear, effectively going invisible to birds.

Advertisement

At a wind farm in Smøla, a wind farm on an island off Norway, a team from the Norwegian Institute for Nature Research decided to fix this problem. Back in 2013, they painted one of three blades black on four turbines while leaving four neighbors untouched. Annual deaths fell a whopping 71.9% at the painted ones.

That said, the same trick does not apply everywhere. Dutch researchers tried to do something similar in 2022, when they painted a single blade black on seven of 14 monitored turbines at Eemshaven. It made little difference, proving that what saves birds at one wind farm can do nothing at the next one.

Advertisement

Teaching a turbine to notice a bird

While paint could genuinely help reduce the problem at a lot of wind farms, it’s not exactly a smart solution that can adapt to its surroundings. And that’s a gap a Colorado firm called Boulder Imaging aims to address, with a system that watches whether a bird is closing in. The system is called IdentiFlight, and it puts camera towers around a wind farm, tracking anything flying within a kilometer. Individual turbines then get an order to stop when a flagged species looks likely to reach the blades, much like how wind turbines already stop themselves in extreme weather. Researchers from The Peregrine Fund, a raptor conservation group, put this tech to the test by comparing two farms about nine miles away from each other in Wyoming. They found the equipped farm saw a notable 82% drop in eagle deaths.

Another route, one that’s more economical too since it doesn’t involve stopping windmills, is speakers. Spanish firm Liquen has come up with a system called DTBird that spots birds the same way, but rather than bringing things to a halt, simply fires off warning sounds from the tower. This system was successful in cutting down the odds of certain birds approaching the blades by 20 to 30% across two American wind farms that the Renewable Energy Wildlife Institute studied. In the end, it’s clear that with the right method for the place and the right species of bird can work wonders. The only thing remaining is a global fix.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Girl Scouts Unleash Treats for Dogs and Allergy-Safe Cookies for Humans

Published

on

Girl Scout cookie season doesn’t start until January, but when it arrives, two new cookies will appeal to groups who likely haven’t been able to indulge in Girl Scout cookies before: people with dietary restrictions, and dogs.

Sparkables, a crunchy, allergy-friendly oatmeal cookie with chocolate chips and rainbow sprinkles, is formulated for those who are nut-free, gluten-free and vegan. They were developed with Partake Foods, and include whole-grain oats, organic brown sugar, semisweet chocolate chips, cassava flour, oat flour, white rice flour and more. See the full ingredient list online.

Sparkables allergy-friendly Girl Scout cookies
Sparkables are meant to include people with food allergies in Girl Scout cookie season.Girl Scouts of the USA

Patch Pals, a soft-baked, blueberry muffin-flavored treat specifically for pups, was developed with the pet-product company Bark. The treats, which feature four designs representing iconic Girl Scout patches, are for dogs who weigh more than 5 pounds and are older than 6 months. Nutritional info and other details available online.

Sparkables and Patch Pals will only be sold online, so you can’t order them from Girl Scouts outside your local store. The new varieties will be available for shipping when Girl Scout cookie season launches on Jan. 12. You can sign up now to receive a reminder when that date comes.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Apple’s foldable iPhone could cost $2,199, and that’s somehow less than expected

Published

on

Apple’s first foldable iPhone is almost here, and just hours ahead of the launch, we may finally have a better idea of how much it will cost. According to a new Bloomberg report, Apple has recently discussed pricing the device as high as $2,199, while higher-storage versions could get close to the $3,000 mark

There is no getting around it. $2,199 is a lot of money for a smartphone. However, the figure is also a little lower than some of the estimates we have been hearing over the past few months, which placed Apple’s first foldable somewhere around $2,300 to $2,500.

First-generation foldables have never been cheap

Apple entering the foldable market at $2,199 sounds extreme, but first-generation foldables have never been cheap. Samsung’s original Galaxy Fold launched in the U.S. for $1,980 back in 2019.

Samsung has had several generations to refine the formula since then. Its new Galaxy Z Fold 8 starts at $1,899, despite moving to the shorter and wider form factor that has helped make this generation particularly well received.

Apple, meanwhile, is launching an entirely new iPhone category, and the timing is not exactly helping. Bloomberg says the company initially wanted to keep the starting price at $1,999, but the ongoing memory shortage reportedly pushed costs beyond its original targets.

So while $2,199 is still a huge amount of money for a phone, there is some context behind it. Apple is entering a category that has always commanded high prices, while also dealing with unusually expensive RAM and NAND storage at launch.

Advertisement

Getting one could be the bigger problem

The price may not be the only obstacle at launch. Ming-Chi Kuo previously estimated that Apple would have just 500,000 to 1 million foldable iPhones ready during the third quarter, despite plans to build around 7 million to 8 million units during the second half of 2026.

Kuo also previously pointed to a price of around $2,300 to $2,500, so Bloomberg’s latest figure would actually put the starting price below those expectations.

Apple also appears pretty confident in its foldable plans. Bloomberg previously reported that a second-generation model, codenamed V78, is already being lined up for 2027. The first one has not even launched yet, so Apple clearly seems to be treating foldables as something it wants to stick with rather than a one-year experiment.

We should find out soon whether $2,199 is the number Apple finally settles on. The foldable iPhone is expected to debut on September 9, but Apple has not confirmed the price yet.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Microsoft is teasing a snappier Windows 11 experience

Published

on

Microsoft is working on performance improvements for Windows 11 that could make the operating system boot faster and feel more responsive. The company says it has already made “significant gains” in startup speeds, although the changes aren’t available to Windows Insiders just yet.

Speaking at IFA 2026, Mark Linton, VP of Windows & Devices at Microsoft, said the company has been improving both boot times and Windows Hello responsiveness. “We’ve made significant gains on things like boot time, Windows Hello responsiveness,” Linton told Windows Latest.

That could mean less time waiting at the lock screen before you can actually start using your PC. Windows Hello is Microsoft’s biometric authentication system, commonly using facial recognition through a compatible infrared webcam, so faster responsiveness should make signing into Windows feel snappier too.

There’s a catch, though: Microsoft hasn’t started testing these particular improvements publicly. The work is currently being refined in internal builds, so there’s no indication yet of when Windows Insiders or the wider Windows 11 user base will get access.

Advertisement

Microsoft’s ambitions also extend beyond simply getting Windows to start faster. The company is working on broader performance improvements designed to make menus more responsive and apps load more quickly. Some of that work is already appearing in Windows 11, including a CPU-boosting feature called Low Latency Profile.

Advertisement

The push could be particularly useful for the growing number of Windows 11 laptops with 8GB of RAM. Rising memory prices have made lower-memory configurations more relevant again, and Microsoft says it is specifically working to make Windows 11 perform better on machines with 8GB.

“We’re continuing to improve on the fundamentals,” Linton said, adding that Microsoft is “optimizing so that 8 gig of RAM runs great on machines as well.”

Advertisement

Microsoft hasn’t put a figure on how much faster Windows 11 could become, so it’s too early to know whether these improvements will be immediately noticeable. Still, with faster startup, quicker Windows Hello authentication and wider performance optimisations in development, Microsoft appears to be putting more focus on making Windows 11 feel faster rather than simply adding more features.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 business laptop review

Published

on

Why you can trust TechRadar


We spend hours testing every product or service we review, so you can be sure you’re buying the best. Find out more about how we test.

The Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 is a powerhouse and a semi-portable shell. It takes on the power of the beloved X1 Extreme, pairing an ultra 9 processor with quick memory, Thunderbolt 5, and decent storage. It’s designed for engineers, creatives, and other power users who need a machine that can do it all while still having that hint of portability.

I think of this quite like the 16-inch MacBook Pro. It’s the bigger choice in the line-up, but you would get it because you want the power and the ability, not necessarily the portability. The people who would get this laptop are the people who need the ports as well.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Australia To Let Social Media Users 'Opt Out' of Algorithm-Based Feeds

Published

on

Australia is proposing the “My Feed, My Way” initiative that would force social media platforms to let users over 16 turn off algorithmic recommendations and instead see only posts from people and creators they follow. Platforms that fail to comply could face fines of up to $79 million. CNBC reports: The legislation, which is being drafted and released Tuesday for targeted consultation, would require platforms to send notifications to new and existing users so they can choose their default feed. […] The measures, set to be introduced to the Parliament of Australia this year, will also require AI chatbots, online games and other digital services to take action to protect under-18s from addictive design features. “This is not about giving government control. It’s about giving people control. It’s about putting choice back into the hands of Australians online,” said Prime Minister Anthony at a press conference on Tuesday.

“This is sensible, pragmatic, practical reform. It gives users choice, and it will hold the big tech companies responsible for inaction.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Meta debuts its Muse AI agent. Will consumers trust it?

Published

on

Less than two weeks after Meta agreed to a massive $18 billion multistate settlement in a lawsuit over social media’s consumer harms, the company announced its biggest bet on consumer AI to date — and one that requires significantly more trust than social media ever did. On Tuesday, the company introduced Muse, its new personal AI agent that helps consumers with everyday tasks and projects for users in the U.S.

To use Muse, consumers will have to trust Meta with more of their personal information than ever before. The AI agent works by connecting to the user’s apps and services that are a part of everyday workflows, like email, calendars, payments, and other things the individual may regularly use, like apps for health and fitness, the smart home, dining, shopping, music and events, and more.

The idea is a sizable bet on what comes after the ChatGPT era, where AI chatbots answered questions, served as sounding boards, or even became digital companions. Instead, Muse is focusing on AI that can actually do things for you.

Image Credits:Meta

The company says the agent can do things like sending emails, booking travel, lowering bills, filling out forms, creating plans, turning recipe reels into grocery lists, sending party invitations, and making purchases, leveraging Link by Stripe for checkout. The latter offers purchase protections, which could potentially ease consumers’ fears of letting an AI check out on their behalf. (Shopify’s Shop Pay and 1Password integrations are also coming soon.)

Muse’s users can decide which apps and services they want to connect, doing so one at a time, to make the opt-in nature of using Muse more transparent. The agent is powered by Meta’s AI model, Muse Spark, and ships with built-in connectors (pictured below) for several services, with plans to add more over time. If a service the user wants isn’t available but offers a public API, Muse can set up a connection using credentials the user provides. When no API is available, Muse can access the service via the browser instead.

Advertisement
Image Credits:Meta

Muse will initially be available via the web at muse.ai, through apps on iOS and Android, and through chats in WhatsApp. It will soon also make its way to Meta’s AI glasses, the company says. It will be free to use, with subscription plans kicking in as usage increases, which is why Muse requires a payment card to get started.

Two paid plans will be available at launch: Power at $20/month and Maximum at $100/month. Both of these subscriptions offer more Muse usage for handing off everyday tasks, though Meta believes most people will remain on the free tier. (The company says the app includes a usage meter that shows users what percentage of their usage they have left. It will also warn users when free usage runs out and present options to subscribe.)

Like other AI agents, Muse will continue to work even after the user leaves the app. It will also improve over time by learning from the user’s conversations what’s important to them to make suggestions unprompted, Meta noted.

Image Credits:Meta

The concept is not unique to Meta. The agentic era is now coming into its own, as larger companies and smaller startups alike are experimenting with how AI agents will make the most sense for consumers and can become integrated into people’s daily lives.

Some have tried AI web browsers or services, like Gemini Spark or Claude Cowork, that can kick off various tasks on consumers’ behalf. Others are integrating AI into the chat applications consumers use the most, like Apple’s iMessage platform, SMS, and WhatsApp.

Image Credits:Meta

Despite their usefulness, these powerful agents have forced consumers to wrestle with difficult questions about how much privacy they’re willing to give up. Many early testers of the AI assistant Instinct were shocked to see the app required a broad “perpetual and irrevocable” license to “access, use, host, cache, store, reproduce, transmit, display, publish, distribute, and modify” any of the user’s materials, including for training its AI models. 

Image Credits:Meta

Under the hood, Meta claims that Muse runs in its own “dedicated, secure computer with its own browser,” Muse Secure VM, which offers various privacy, safety, and security protections over customers’ data. The company says a separate Sentinel agent runs on that same virtual machine, but is kept apart from Muse at the system level.

Image Credits:Meta

This means Muse won’t have visibility into people’s passwords or payment methods. Meta also claims that Muse doesn’t share people’s conversations or data with Meta’s ads systems.

(These claims are explained in more detail in a technical post, also released today, but will require deeper investigation by security experts.)

Advertisement

Could Meta’s history hurt Muse adoption?

Despite Meta’s documentation of its security measures, it remains to be seen whether the company has enough consumer trust for its agent to be successful.

As it stands, Meta has a history of proclaiming one thing and doing another. In 2011, for instance, the tech giant settled with the FTC over charges that it deceived consumers by making users’ private information public without their approval. In 2019, the FTC penalized Facebook in a then record-breaking $5 billion settlement over eight separate privacy-related violations. In 2023, the FTC charged Meta with violating a privacy order that was filed after the 2019 settlement.

In terms of technical matters, Meta has also had some big missteps before, having discovered in 2019 a number of users’ passwords in readable formats, exposing people to potential hacks. The massive Cambridge Analytica data scandal, which saw Facebook data belonging to millions of consumers collected by a third-party without their consent, still lingers in some people’s minds, too.

Mark Zuckerberg, chief executive officer of Meta Platforms Inc.
Mark Zuckerberg, chief executive officer of Meta Platforms Inc., exits Los Angeles Superior Court in Los Angeles, California, US, on Wednesday, February 18, 2026. Zuckerberg testified that it’s “very difficult” to enforce Instagram’s age limits and downplayed how much teen users do for the company’s business during a landmark trial over social media addiction.Image Credits:Kyle Grillot/Bloomberg (opens in a new window) / Getty Images

Meta has also been repeatedly hauled before Congress to testify on how it protected — or failed to protect — minors from harm. With Congress failing to act, Meta ultimately became the target of several related lawsuits, including the one Meta just settled with 29 states in August, a New Mexico lawsuit over harms for children, where Meta was ordered to pay $942 million, and the thousands of personal-injury and school-district cases that are still pending against multiple social media giants.

To ease consumers’ fears, Meta not only talks in depth about its security promises, offering technical documentation and explanations. The company has also designed Muse in a way that would make consumers feel more connected with the agent itself. Users can customize Muse by giving it a name, picking out its avatar, and configuring its look and various settings that dictate how the agent communicates with them.

Advertisement

Time will tell if this personal connection and the utility Muse provides are enough for consumers to once again trust Meta with their personal information.

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Floating nuclear startup Bluecore lands $50M funding before setting sail

Published

on

SYSTEMS

Startup wants to take atomic power generation on a barge to wherever the need is

Startup Bluecore Energy has raised $50 million in seed funding to develop floating nuclear power plants intended to supply ports and other locations with rapidly growing energy demands.

Advertisement

The California-based company said the Silverton Partners-led round, which includes $10 million in previously announced pre-seed funding, brought in several new investors. It plans to use the money to engineer and test its compact nuclear power system and pursue regulatory approval and maritime classification.

Its initial design is intended to generate about 10 MWe – megawatts of electrical output – continuously using light-water reactor technology. Bluecore says the maritime system would be able to operate for years at a time and require refueling only once every few years.

The company has secured its first barge and is developing a non-fueled, electrically heated reactor module prototype at its Port of Long Beach headquarters to test monitoring, sensor, and control systems.

Bluecore is targeting ports, AI datacenters, and coastal infrastructure, with the reactors potentially deployed offshore and connected to customers by subsea cables. Remote islands and coastal settlements in places such as Alaska may also lack practical connections to a wider electricity grid.

Advertisement

Bluecore claims its approach could provide reliable, zero-emission power to energy-intensive locations and open additional markets for nuclear generation.

“Six months ago, we were building the foundation. Today, we have the capital, the team, the hardware, and some of the most important institutions in nuclear and maritime working alongside us,” said Bluecore founder and CEO Kofi Asante.

A Bluecore barge moored at the company's headquarters in the Port of Long Beach, California

Bluecore barge

“Our focus now is simple: create and deliver zero-emission energy as safely and quickly as possible.”

The move follows the launch of the International Atomic Energy Agency’s (IAEA) Atomic Technologies Licensed for Applications at Sea (ATLAS) initiative in the US capital last month.

Advertisement

Secretary of Energy Chris Wright linked that event to the Department of Energy’s own efforts to rapidly expand the provisioning of atomic energy generating capacity in order to meet the requirements of AI datacenters and other industries.

Bluecore has begun discussions with the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and Coast Guard. The two agencies recently signed a memorandum of understanding to coordinate oversight of the design, construction, and operation of civilian floating nuclear power plants. The NRC says it is ready to license maritime reactors under existing federal regulations, while it develops an additional framework for microreactors and similarly low-risk designs.

Bluecore remains years from commercial deployment. It has yet to build a fueled reactor or apply for the approvals required to operate one, and its Long Beach proposal must also navigate California’s restrictions on new nuclear power plants.

While some may have concerns about waterborne atomic power plants, America has a long history of maritime nuclear generation. All of the US Navy’s active aircraft carriers are nuclear-powered, but the technology first went to sea aboard the submarine USS Nautilus in 1955. USS Enterprise became the first nuclear-powered aircraft carrier in 1961, while the cruiser USS Long Beach, commissioned the same year, was the first nuclear-powered surface combatant.

Advertisement

Bluecore says its team includes former US Navy nuclear submarine officers and leaders with experience across organizations including SpaceX, Northrop Grumman, Toyota, Rivian, and Uber.

Russia currently operates the world’s only floating nuclear power plant. The barge-like Akademik Lomonosov is considerably larger than Bluecore’s proposed design and can generate up to 70 MWe. ®

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

This is set to be the world’s most expensive gas power plant ever built and the second most powerful one

Published

on


  • South Korea could invest $22.3 billion in a massive Texas gas plant
  • The proposed facility would generate 6.3 GW of electricity for AI
  • Seoul says negotiations remain unfinished, leaving the reported investment unconfirmed

South Korea and the United States have reportedly settled on how much Seoul will contribute towards a new energy facility in southern Texas.

Korean outlet Edaily, citing unnamed officials and lawmakers, reported the contribution at close to $22.3 billion for the venture, which would be built in Encinal, Texas, and is expected to produce 6.3 gigawatts of electricity to power AI data centers once fully operational.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025