A software engineer built talking copies of Elon Musk, Sam Altman, Mark Zuckerberg, and Dario Amodei. Then he put all four in one chat room and told them to debate.

It did not take long to turn personal. In real life, none of the four men knew it was happening.

The Ghosts in the Room

Kun Chen was a senior engineer at Meta, Microsoft, and Atlassian. He now builds AI assistants. The builder reportedly fed a machine everything he himself had said in public and told the AI to think like him. He calls this distillation.

Chen did the same to four men: Elon Musk, Sam Altman, Dario Amodei, and Mark Zuckerberg. The AI personas debated as they would in real life; they agreed on almost nothing.

Chen reveals feeding their Senate testimony, interviews, and years of posts into Grok, the chatbot built by xAI. He gave them one instruction.

“hey guys, i know you aren’t all friends but unfortunately you are now in this room together for a heated debate on who’s going to win the AI race,” Kun Chen wrote in the published transcript.

The Fight Nobody Won

The Altman copy went first. It said the hard science of human-level AI is finished. The Amodei copy tore that apart in one reply. Elon Musk’s copy went for the throat.

“I created OpenAI as a non-profit. If it had not been mostly stolen, it would be a trillion dollar contribution to charity,” the Musk bot allegedly said.

Altman’s copy refused to take the bait. It later admitted it had overclaimed.

The last fight was over open source, meaning AI anyone can download and run at home. Zuckerberg’s copy called it the only safe future. The other three refused, and his line was cut.

Here is the uncomfortable part. The argument sounded right. Four men were convincingly faked from their own public words, and nobody needed their permission.

BeInCrypto reported a version of that worry in April, when OpenAI warned that superintelligence could concentrate power in too few hands.

The post AI Clones of Musk, Altman and Zuckerberg Turned on Each Other appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

MoneyGram is following rival Western Union’s lead, rolling out a Visa stablecoin debit card as it expands blockchain-based payments.

Source link

Brian Armstrong, Coinbase’s CEO, said Bitcoin reaching $400,000 by 2030 is a reasonable target, and described the $300,000-$400,000 range as very likely to be hit within that window, in a CNBC Squawk Box Asia segment. The call is Armstrong’s personal read on where Bitcoin’s price could land, not a formal Coinbase corporate forecast or a consensus market call.

Armstrong is the CEO of the largest U.S. crypto exchange, and his outlook carries weight because it’s grounded in policy developments he’s directly involved in shaping, not a spreadsheet model he’s publishing for Coinbase clients.

In the clip, Armstrong walked through the CLARITY Act and what greater regulatory clarity could mean for the crypto industry as a whole, tying the legislation to the pace at which institutional capital moves into digital assets. He also said he believes the Bitcoin trade has already bottomed and expects upside as pressure continues to build in global bond markets.

That bond-market framing is the more interesting piece for traders parsing his logic. Armstrong is effectively arguing that stress in sovereign debt markets pushes capital toward scarce, non-sovereign assets, a thesis long-time Bitcoin holders have made for years.

Coinbase itself sits at the center of that flow, and Armstrong’s comments arrive as the exchange continues pushing regulators toward a clearer rulebook for digital assets, a topic covered in more detail in our look at how regulatory clarity could unlock institutional capital.

Neither the CNBC segment nor Armstrong’s remarks lay out a specific valuation model, a probability weighting, or a precise timeline for the bottom he says has already formed; the forecast is directional conviction.

Discover: The Best Token Presales

Why Regulatory Clarity Keeps Coming Up

The CLARITY Act has become shorthand in these conversations for the broader push to define how digital assets get regulated in the U.S. Armstrong’s decision to lead with it signals where he thinks the real re-rating catalyst sits.

His argument, as framed in the CNBC segment, links clearer rules directly to wider institutional adoption. The logic being that large allocators need defined jurisdiction and compliance guardrails before committing larger positions to Bitcoin meaningfully.

That’s a familiar setup for anyone who traded through prior Bitcoin price prediction cycles tied to ETF approvals: the asset doesn’t need the legislation to pass to rally, but sustained institutional flow tends to follow policy certainty rather than lead it.

Earn $50 and Enter $300K Prize Draw on EdgeX

What Happens Next for Bitcoin?

Armstrong’s comments don’t reference a specific pending vote or implementation deadline, so traders shouldn’t treat passage of any legislation as imminent based on this interview alone. The more relevant variable in the near term is whether Bitcoin can confirm the bottom Armstrong referenced.

Bitcoin (BTC)

24h7d30d1yAll time

Until regulatory outcomes firm up, Armstrong’s $400,000 figure functions as a directional marker rather than a tradable price level, the kind of long-dated target that shapes positioning sentiment more than it dictates entries.

Whether it holds up depends less on Coinbase’s own roadmap and more on how quickly institutional capital and policy clarity actually materialize over the next several years.

Trade Crypto on Bybit and Get a Chance to Win Our $1,000 USDT Airdrop

The post Bitcoin News: Bond Stress and Regulation Shape Armstrong’s $400K BTC Prediction appeared first on Cryptonews.

Source link

The SEC’s new proposal to overhaul transfer-agent rules could eliminate duplicate offchain shareholder records, reducing reconciliation costs and legal uncertainty for tokenized securities.

Source link

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong has backed the CLARITY Act once again ahead of its September 15 Senate vote.

He argued that the bill could give US crypto markets a clearer framework and help bring institutional capital and tokenized assets into the country.

Armstrong Lays Out His Case for a Yes Vote

Speaking on CNBC’s Squawk Box Asia on September 10, Armstrong described the CLARITY Act as “ready to get a yes vote” and told viewers that people he had spoken with in the Senate were on board.

“Law enforcement groups are now on board. Many banks are on board. The crypto companies are on board,” he said, while also pointing to hundreds of pages of input from both Republicans and Democrats.

The Coinbase chief also noted that his company had previously raised concerns about the bill but now believes the issues it considered non-negotiable changes have been sorted.

“All of those must-have issues that we raised our hands on last time have now been resolved,” he said.

As CryptoPotato reported in August, Senate Majority Leader John Thune filed cloture before the lawmakers went on recess, setting September 15 as the date for the procedural vote. The measure needs 60 votes, meaning Republicans cannot pass it without support from at least seven Democrats or independents.

The political negotiations also include ethics provisions covering digital-asset holdings and projects linked to elected officials, including President Donald Trump.

Armstrong characterized the White House proposal as containing “very strong” ethics provisions, while Democrats have sought additional measures, including divestiture. He added that the discussions appeared to be close to a solution, calling the issue one of the last pieces to fall into place.

The crypto executive also drew a link between regulatory clarity and institutional adoption. Pointing to the GENIUS Act, he noted that more than 150 large companies integrated stablecoins within three months of its passage.

In his view, CLARITY could act as a regulatory “checkbox” for institutional investors and help bring tokenized equities and perpetual contracts to the US. According to Armstrong, even if the bill doesn’t pass, the alternative is already taking shape through the SEC and CFTC.

Last month, he predicted that clarity would arrive through either congressional action or agency rules, after CFTC Chairman Michael Selig had earlier outlined how the agency could use its existing authority to establish a crypto trading framework if Congress stayed deadlocked. Armstrong therefore framed September 15 as a decision point rather than the only route to new rules.

Bitcoin to $400,000 by 2030

He also connected the regulatory debate to broader financial conditions, arguing that excessive government spending can push investors toward Bitcoin “almost like gold.” Furthermore, he pointed to regulated stablecoins as structural buyers of US government debt, creating demand for Treasury bills and potentially helping lower rates.

On Bitcoin itself, Armstrong maintained that $400,000 by 2030 remains a reasonable target. He believes the cryptocurrency’s one-year downturn may have already reached its bottom, noting that the next halving is about a year and a half away and that previous market run-ups have tended to come right before those events.

“I think the next year or two is going to be good for Bitcoin,” he stated.

The post Coinbase CEO Backs CLARITY Act to Secure ‘Yes’ Vote on September 15 appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Source link

So-called digital arrest scams use false claims of authority to pressure victims virtually into making rapid digital payments, including cryptocurrency transactions, writes Moody’s Rich Graham.

Source link

The coalition warned that the current limit is too low, noting some existing European projects already exceed it.

Source link

Source link

Source link

Almost every large crypto token fell through the overnight sessions and into Thursday's U.S. open, as an oil shock drove long-dated Treasury yields to multi-year highs and traders raised the odds of a Federal Reserve rate increase next week to 64%. Traders put a quarter-point September increase at… Read the full story at The Defiant

Source link