Connect with us

NewsBeat

Students should stop texting Mum and learn lessons in life

Published

on

Students should stop texting Mum and learn lessons in life

It wasn’t that I didn’t care about, or had forgotten, them – there was just no need to call. They knew where I was, and that I was safe. I knew where they were and that they were well. So, apart from a very occasional call – maybe twice over the 12 weeks – there was no contact. It was the same for my flatmates, who also rarely called home.

When we did ring, we hated having to queue at the little phone booth under the stairs in our hall of residence. The sole payphone was always busy, usually with someone on a lengthy call to a boyfriend or girlfriend back home, trying to convince them that they were miserable and missing them, before heading to the pub with their new set of mates.

So, unless you could be bothered to find and use a payphone in town – and let’s not forget how payphones gobbled up your change – calls to family were few and far between.

Did this lack of contact do us any harm? Did it upset our parents? Of course not. Those were the days pre-mobile phone, when students carving out new lives many miles from home really were independent.

Advertisement

Not so now. Technology may have moved on, but it has made young people far more dependent on their parents.

Today’s young students find it difficult to fully fly the nest – sending 528 text messages a year to Mum and Dad, asking for help.

Grown-up children turn to their parents for everything, from cooking queries, such as how to boil an egg, to money issues, flat sharing problems and applying for part-time work, according to a study commissioned by Costa Coffee.

They even contact their parents to ask about where to find the electricity meter and stopcock in a house, and how to book an Uber. So clingy are some students that 61 per cent of parents feel as though they haven’t left home.

Advertisement

Debit cardMoney issues are another subject about which students contact their parents. Picture: Pixabay

Students starting out this month at universities across the UK are, by all accounts, among the brightest members of society, so how come they need help with what are fairly basic aspects of life?

Some of the blame has to be levelled at the advancements in technology. As I said previously, the only way we could contact our parents was by payphone, which was a hassle. Nowadays, with mobile phones – which parents are most likely paying for – children can call Mum and Dad anytime, or send a quick message on WhatsApp.

It’s a great shame. It’s hugely beneficial for young people to work problems out for themselves. It’s what people refer to as lessons in life. In fact, lessons in life would be a great GSCE subject. Areas covered could include managing finances – budgeting for the weekly shop and bills, plus information about rent, mortgages, Council Tax, credit cards and income tax. In other words, the cost of living.

A module on practical skills would be hugely useful, covering such things as cooking and using a washing machine, and DIY skills like putting up a shelf and changing a lightbulb.

Advertisement

Then there’s those general administrative skills that we all need to master – mobile phone contracts, meter readings and how to write a formal email. All of this would help towards carving out an independent life. Aside from that, today’s students have got Google and YouTube offering advice on everything.

As a student living 250 miles from home, I loved forging a life for myself. It wasn’t always easy, but we students were all in the same boat and, between us, we worked stuff out. My husband went to boarding school, so was already accustomed to long periods of no contact with his parents.

I am pleased to say that, despite having mobile phones, neither of my daughters sent frequent SOS messages when they left home.

We are, of course, always there if they need us; keeping in touch is important, but kids need to grow up and negotiate the trials and tribulations of the real world. They will be stronger for it.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

NewsBeat

Daily horoscope September 26, 2026: Predictions for your star sign

Published

on

Daily horoscope September 26, 2026: Predictions for your star sign
Here’s what the stars have in store for your day (Picture: Metro.co.uk)

There’s a lot going on in the skies today, most notably an Aries Full Moon.

This transit could heighten irritability for some, while others may find themselves feeling especially assertive.

As this Moon phase comes to an end, Gemini and Virgo may find themselves at a fresh crossroads, making careful consideration more important than ever.

Ahead, you’ll find all star signs’ horoscopes for today: Saturday September 26, 2026.

Advertisement

Like checking your horoscope every morning? You can now sign up to our free daily newsletter to get a personalised reading for your star sign delivered straight to your inbox.

To order your unique personal horoscope based on your time, date and place of birth, visit patrickarundell.com.

Aries

March 21 to April 20

Today’s Aries Full Moon is a truly fascinating event this year. This luminary in your sign is passionate and can be impulsive. This time, with the shimmering attentions of dreamy Neptune, your usual feistiness can be tempered by added sensitivity, particularly around relationships. Partnered up? You need your other half to be particularly attentive.

Advertisement

Head here for everything you need to know about being an Aries

Today’s celestial guidance for Aries

Taurus

Ask Metro


Use AI to go deeper into the stories you care about – powered by Metro and trusted publications.

April 21 to May 21

Advertisement

With Chiron, Saturn, and Neptune all in Retrograde in the tender 12th House of your chart, along with today’s Aries Moon phase, this is the perfect time to be particularly conscious of your inner world. It’s a hustle-bustle era we live in, and downtime can often be at a premium, but give yourself permission to draw back when you can over the next fortnight.

Head here for everything you need to know about being a Taurus

Today’s planetary forecast for Taurus

Gemini

May 22 to June 21

You might find yourself at a crossroads. However, this doesn’t mean your options are all in one direction or the other, or totally crystal clear, which can make them a little trickier to decipher. For example, there may be two people you’re really drawn to, or differing groups of friends or shared interests. Just take your time deciding which road to take, Gemini.

Head here for everything you need to know about being a Gemini

Advertisement
How the stars aligned for Gemini today

Cancer

June 22 to July 23

We all need to be flexible, but how far are you turning yourself inside out to fit into a situation where you are unsure of your purpose? Rather than think through the lens of success, status, earnings, or even convention, the Sun asks you now, as he challenges your ruler, the Moon, to consider what works best at a personal and deeper, more feeling level.

Head here for everything you need to know about being a Cancer

Celestial energies for Cancer today

Leo

July 24 to August 23

You can find your imagination is particularly vivid today. If you enjoy watching movies, you can pledge to see a new release or a comforting, well-loved classic. In fact, anything that helps you trip the light fantastic while also enjoying some full-on escapism can be perfect just now. When it comes to travel plans or paperwork, though, do double-check details.

Head here for everything you need to know about being a Leo

Advertisement
Your daily zodiac insight for Leo

Virgo

August 24 to September 23

A commitment or involvement that has been important to you could reach a tender juncture today. If you feel it is evolving and growing, you’ll likely be in the mood to immerse yourself ever more deeply. If, however, you feel unsure, something may need to dissolve. Equally, this could mean releasing an attachment to something that is no longer healthy.

Head here for everything you need to know about being a Virgo

Cosmic messages for Virgo today

Libra

September 24 to October 23

You can be very attentive to others, and that part of your nature can come up with today’s Full Moon. However, recent years have taught you that you also need to be mindful of your boundaries. Where they are respected, you can be happy to assist. Where that is unclear, stay clear. Exactly this dynamic can show up over the next two weeks.

Head here for everything you need to know about being a Libra

Advertisement
Your daily stellar guidance for Libra

Scorpio

October 24 to November 22

Full Moons, like today’s, can create a lot of intensity. So many cycles in our lives are impacted by this luminary, not least sleep, moods and emotions. Look to nurture your needs in this way over the next fortnight. Do, though be sure to attend to everyday details and obligations you have. In your world of work, concentration can prove harder; so, do stay watchful.

Head here for everything you need to know about being a Scorpio

Star alignments for Scorpio today

Sagittarius

November 23 to December 21

Ask yourself a big question today, Sagittarius: are your long-term aims still in alignment with your developing interests and talents, as much as they were? If things have drifted and you are maintaining a direction of travel that no longer inspires you, then today is the time to seriously ponder how to redirect your energies in a way that is fulfilling and apt.

Head here for everything you need to know about being a Sagittarius

Advertisement
Today’s astral messages for Sagittarius

Capricorn

December 22 to January 21

You are well known and respected for your ability to chisel away at life, even when it might not offer the most glittering immediate prizes. What you appreciate is that, over the long term, the application yields solid, lasting results. However, you may now question whether it is your personal and emotional life that requires most of your attention

Head here for everything you need to know about being a Capricorn

Your zodiac forecast for Capricorn today

Aquarius

January 22 to February 19

Even if there is something delicate that needs to be discussed, as long as you have a clear idea of what you want to say, and why, all will be well. However, the crucial bit is having that clarity. And frankly, today, and for the next week or so, things could seem hazier. The good news is Pluto in your sign helps you to dive deep to decipher the signals.

Head here for everything you need to know about being an Aquarius

Advertisement
Daily cosmic update for Aquarius

Pisces

February 20 to March 20

If you need to discuss your personal or shared finances today, write down exactly what’s what. Even if you pride yourself on being sharp with numbers and your budget, if you are interacting with someone else, having a crib sheet can prove really helpful, as today’s Lunation can create a hazy vibe which may prove hard to slice through for us all.

Head here for everything you need to know about being a Pisces

Your cosmic energy update for Pisces

Your daily Metro.co.uk horoscope is here every morning, seven days a week (yes, including weekends!). To check your forecast, head to our dedicated horoscopes page.

Head here for this week’s tarot horoscope reading, and see what the cards have in store for you!

Check out the tarot horoscope reading for the month of September here.

Advertisement

Prefer us to the others? Then tell Google!

As a loyal Metro reader, we want to make sure you never miss our stories when searching for your news. Whether it is the latest politics news explained, live football coverage or a showbiz scoop.

Click the button below and tick Metro.co.uk to ensure you see stories from us first in Google Search.

Add us as a Preferred Source

Our journalists work hard to deliver the most important stories from around the world
Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Have I Got News For You complaints over Victoria Beckham slur are upheld by BBC bosses as Katherine Ryan apologises for ‘stupid joke’

Published

on

The BBC has upheld complaints about comedian Katherine Ryan linking an obscene term to Victoria Beckham on Have I Got News For You

Advertisement

The BBC has upheld complaints about comedian Katherine Ryan linking an obscene term to Victoria Beckham on Have I Got News For You.

Viewers complained after Ms Ryan seemingly referred to the fashion designer as a c-word.

An internal investigation into the episode of the satirical show in November 2025 came after two viewers said the remark was ‘gratuitously offensive’.

On the programme, which was hosted by Ms Ryan, 43, the segment discussed David Beckham allegedly using the word in an email to his publicist where he expressed outrage at missing out on a knighthood in 2013 (he has since been knighted). He apparently referred to the honours committee as ‘a bunch of cs’.

Advertisement

The BBC’s Executive Complaints Unit (ECU) ruled that panellist Maisie Adam’s use of the word ‘c’ was justified as it referred to Sir David’s own alleged use of the term. 

However the ECU ruling concluded that there was no editorial justification for Ms Ryan’s subsequent joke about his wife.

The BBC has upheld complaints about comedian Katherine Ryan linking an obscene term to Victoria Beckham on Have I Got News For You

Advertisement

Ms Ryan said in the recording: ‘I don’t know that we are allowed to broadcast the c-word, but you did reference Victoria Beckham earlier and we’ll allow that.’

In its ruling, the ECU said: ‘There was no such justification for a comment which presented Victoria Beckham as equivalent to a particularly offensive word.’

Ms Ryan has since posted a video to her social media in response, blaming the incident on her being the mother of a newborn. 

She said: ‘At that time, though there is no defence, I was suffering from a condition called matrescence. I was in that building with a ten-day-old baby. Should I have left the house?

Advertisement

‘This is gonna be a tough one for the feminists because I was a woman going to work but I did call another woman a c. Sometimes I forget that celebrities are not my friends. If I had called Jimmy Carr a c, he wouldn’t have minded.

‘But this was described by the BBC as a slur, as though c are part of a protected group.

‘If you watched it on the day, it was clearly a joke and the whole audience went [gasp] and then I said, ‘Woah, I love her’.’

She also shared a screenshot of a message she sent to Lady Beckham after ‘to make it clear it was a stupid joke and I didn’t mean any harm towards you at all’.

Advertisement

Join the discussion

Did Katherine Ryan’s joke about Victoria Beckham cross the line, or was the reaction over the top?

Viewers complained after Ms Ryan seemingly referred to the fashion designer as a c-word

Viewers complained after Ms Ryan seemingly referred to the fashion designer as a c-word 

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Man City face RELEGATION ‘nuclear option’ and appeal ‘highly unlikely to succeed’, says their former financial advisor, as they are found guilty of 114 Premier League charges

Published

on

Manchester City have been found guilty of the vast majority of their 115 Premier League rule-break charges

Former Manchester City financial advisor Stefan Borson has claimed ‘anything is possible,’ including the nuclear option of relegation, after the club were found guilty of breaching Premier League financial rules.

The Premier League accused the club of widespread financial cheating over an era of sustained success – with an independent panel hearing concluding in 2024.

There has since been a frustrating wait for a verdict but Daily Mail Sport sources have disclosed that clubs have been informed that the panel has now reached a decision – and there is a belief it’s a win for the top flight.

City are understood to have been found guilty on all but one of their 115 rule-break charges concerning the Premier League’s financial regulations.

Advertisement

Borson, who advised Man City between 2002 and 2007, was asked by talkSPORT whether the nuclear option of relegation from the Premier League was on the table as a possible punishment following the decision.

‘Anything is possible and all hell is now going to break loose, as this is going to go on for weeks and weeks and weeks,’ Borson said.

Manchester City have been found guilty of the vast majority of their 115 Premier League rule-break charges 

Advertisement
Former Man City financial advisor Stefan Borson believes 'anything is possible' regarding the club's potentinal punishments and that an appeal is 'hihgly unlikely to succeed'

Former Man City financial advisor Stefan Borson believes ‘anything is possible’ regarding the club’s potentinal punishments and that an appeal is ‘hihgly unlikely to succeed’

The verdict could lead to a variety of punishments including huge points deductions, financial penalties, and even relegation

The verdict could lead to a variety of punishments including huge points deductions, financial penalties, and even relegation

‘It is going to be very hard for City to say anything or to contain the fallout from this scenario and that is without being able to see what is in this decision.

‘We will almost certainly soon see the decision of the independent commission laid out in great detail, it will give people huge ammunition to attack those individuals and the club.

Advertisement

‘Then we will go into the process, which will be behind closed doors, around the sanction. 

‘Man City have denied everything all the way through, they have gone through a process that may have cost more than £100m between the two parties and they have been found to have breached everything.

‘They are in very, very serious trouble.’

An appeal from Man City is considered inevitable with the club having always strongly denied wrongdoing, since they were charged in February 2023 by the Premier League.

Advertisement

A Manchester City spokesperson said: ‘The Premier League process remains ongoing, with significant elements to be completed, and subject to strict confidentiality. As such Manchester City FC’s position remains consistent with the Club’s statement of February 2023.

‘The Club has diligently respected due process for eight years on the basis that the Premier League Board and Executive would behave as an independent, impartial and fair-minded regulator, free from partisan influence.’

Borson claimed an appeal from Man City is ‘highly unlikely to succeed’ and suggested their statement indicated their likely arguments in an attempt to overturn the verdict.

‘An appeal on the facts is highly unlikely to succeed,’ he said.

Advertisement
The club have maintained that they are innocent throughout the process and are expected to appeal

The club have maintained that they are innocent throughout the process and are expected to appeal

‘Where we are now with City being found guilty of more or less everything, the decision itself will be scathing in terms of the club’s conduct, the conduct of individuals, the behaviour of individuals and the hearing itself in terms of their credibility. There won’t be any hiding place when that decision is published.

‘To then have to present that to an appeal that does not have the benefit of listening to the whole case all over again, in terms of witness evidence, seeing all the documentation again, it is going to be extremely difficult for City to overturn those factual findings.

‘City have hinted in the last paragraph of their statement, I think their suggestion is that the process and panel itself was in some way partial and biased and that they will in some way challenge the length of time it has taken for the decision to come out.

Advertisement

‘All of those sorts of arguments, be it bias or something procedural, all of them are very unlikely to succeed. Overturning factual findings I would say is very, very unlikely.

‘Ultimately now I think City will have to take their punishment and it will be severe.’

The Premier League accused Man City of multiple breaches of financial rules and of failing to co-operate with a subsequent investigation. The alleged rule breaking was claimed to have taken place over a 14-year period.

A three-man panel was tasked with considering the evidence, with the initial expectation a verdict would have been reached on the case within months. It has since taken three-and-a-half years.

Advertisement

The original 115 charges were extended to a total of 130 after an administration issue in what is the most expensive and wide-ranging case in English football history.

Eight Premier League titles, three FA Cups, six League Cups and one Champions League have all been won by the club in the modern era

Eight Premier League titles, three FA Cups, six League Cups and one Champions League have all been won by the club in the modern era

City remained steadfast in maintaining their innocence over more than 115 alleged breaches across eight years, some including the start of the Pep Guardiola era.

The club were accused of failing to report accurate financial information for nine seasons stretching from 2009-10 to 2017-18, as well as failing to provide full details of former manager Roberto Mancini’s pay between 2009-10 and 2012-13.

Advertisement

They were also alleged to have failed to provide full details of money paid to players between 2010-11 and 2015-16 and failing to co-operate with the probe from 2018 to 2023.

Between the years mentioned, Manchester City won eight Premier League titles, a Champions League, four FA Cups, and seven EFL Cups.

City vehemently denied any breaches of financial rules but the investigation started in December 2018 after German website Der Spiegel published documents from a Football Leaks cache which had originated from Portuguese hacker Rui Pinto.

It alleged that City had overstated sponsorship income with money paid from the club’s owners instead of sponsors linked to Abu Dhabi.

Advertisement

Roberto Mancini’s wages were said to have doubled via a secret contract with an Abu Dhabi club when he was at Man City, while they were also alleged to have broken rules over approaching young players.

The Mail on Sunday has led the way on reporting the story. In July 2021, they reported on emails that appeared to suggest that Man City had millions funnelled into the club by Abu Dhabi to help inflate their income.

Back in February 2020, the club were banned from the Champions League and fined £25million after they were found to have seriously misled European footballing governing body UEFA and broken financial fair play rules.

This was then lifted by the Court of Arbitration for Sport which also reduced the club’s fine to £9million.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

MAN CITY FAN VIEW: My club’s relationship with financial skullduggery has left me yearning for the comedy club days, writes LAWRENCE BOOTH

Published

on

Man City's 115 charges saga has left LAWRENCE BOOTH yearning for the comedy club days

Advertisement

For those of us who supported Manchester City long before they were accused of financial skulduggery, it has been a strange few years.

City were completely inoffensive back then – the comedy club who once kept the ball near the corner flag because they had been (wrongly) told a draw would spare them relegation. 

For years, the fans survived on scraps. The near miss in the 1981 FA Cup final, when they were robbed by a freakish Tommy Hutchison own goal. The Full Members’ Cup final of 1986, when they lost 5-4 to Chelsea. The mad play-off comeback against Gillingham.

But when the money poured in from Abu Dhabi, there arose a strange conundrum. Did I prefer the old days, when City were popular but useless? Or was it all about winning, no matter the cost? The answer was not always straightforward. 

Advertisement

Now that they’ve been found guilty of all but one of the 115 charges, at least we finally have a bit of clarity, grim though it looks. 

My greatest fear has always been that they would be retrospectively stripped of titles, like Russian athletes at the Olympics. 

Man City’s 115 charges saga has left LAWRENCE BOOTH yearning for the comedy club days

Advertisement
The idea Sergio Aguero's last-gasp title winning goal against QPR in 2012 might now be null and void is hard to stomatch

The idea Sergio Aguero’s last-gasp title winning goal against QPR in 2012 might now be null and void is hard to stomatch

Financial penalties, points deductions, even relegation – I could live with all that. But the idea that the last-ditch winner against QPR in 2011-12 might now be null and void is hard to stomach: Aguerooooo…oh! 

Other fans, who have continually protested their indifference to a ‘small club’ like City, will still say their achievements deserve an asterisk. That’s how fandom operates. No matter the lawyers eventually conclude – needless to say, City will appeal – the court of public opinion made up its mind long ago.

I get the sentiment. I didn’t like the fact that City were attracting censure, not affection. I hated the thought that their trophies were regarded as ill-gotten gains. But try as I might, I couldn’t cut the umbilical cord. It’s not terribly logical, but that’s how fandom operates too.

Advertisement

I was also suspicious of the notion that money automatically means success. Manchester United are proof that life isn’t always so simple. Money helps, sure. But it has to be spent wisely: Sergio Aguero, Kevin de Bruyne, Bernardo Silva, Ederson, even Manuel Akanji – was anyone else trying to buy these guys?

Oddly, I found last season quite relaxing, what with Arsenal finally getting over the line. Sorry if it sounds arrogant, but winning the league was no longer the thrill it was when Aguero did his thing. 

Life felt a bit more normal again: a draw was not a disaster, and City’s defending was occasionally comical, just like the old times. Who knows: perhaps, one day, people will even learn to love us again, though I accept that is more likely if we’re banished to the Enterprise Rent-A-Car National League first. 

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Belfast dad killed pregnant mum-of-two with Father’s Day gift before heading to Primark

Published

on

Belfast Live

A Belfast man beat the heavy pregnant mother of his children to death with implements, including a ‘Dad’ water bottle bought as a Father’s Day gift, a court heard today (Friday).

Details of the murder of Donaghadee mother-of-two Sarah Montgomery were aired at Belfast Crown Court where it emerged that as a result of the fatal attack, her 32-week old unborn son Liam did not survive.

The much-loved 27-year old was murdered in her Elmfield Walk home on June 27, 2025 in what a prosecuting barrister described as a “cold-blooded, sustained and murderous attack” which lasted around 19 minutes.

Ms Montgomery sustained at least 59 sites of injury and was left to die in her blood-splattered flat by her murderer Zak Hughes (29) who also took her mobile phone and house keys.

Advertisement

With their two young daughters in his jeep, the personal trainer then changed his clothes and dumped the murder weapons in a bin in Belfast.

As Ms Montgomery’s loved ones sat in the public gallery, Crown barrister Geraldine McCullough KC described what happened in June 2025 as “one of the worst cases of domestic violence in recent times.”

Outlining the Crown’s case to Lady Justice McBride, the prosecutor said Ms Montgomery and Hughes both attended Glastry Secondary School and had been in a relationship from second year.

After Ms Montgomery became pregnant with their first child, their relationship faltered and following this, it continued on an on/off basis.

Advertisement

When Ms Montgomery told Hughes of her second pregnancy, Hughes initially denied he was the father until a DNA test proved he was.

At the time of Ms Montgomery’s death, Hughes lived at Ardglen Place in Belfast with his fiancée who was also heavily pregnant with his child.

Ms McCullough said Hughes had “obviously been involved in sexual relationships with both woman simultaneously.”

Both of Ms Montgomery’s parents are deceased and she last spoke to her grandfather on Friday June 27 when she told him her eldest daughter was unwell and not going to school that day.

Advertisement

When her grandfather spoke to Ms Montgomery later that day, she told him her daughter was waiting for her Daddy to collect her for the weekend.

This routine of Hughes collecting his two daughters on a Friday and leaving then back home on a Sunday was normal.

The Crown barrister said that on Saturday June 28, friends and relatives of Ms Montgomery’s tried to contact her by phone but got no response.

Her grandfather went to the flat and, using his own key as the door was locked, he discovered his granddaughter cold and lying on her side covered in blood.

Advertisement

She was lying partially in the living room and partially in the hall and a broken brush was under her body.

There was blood throughout the flat and after another relative arrived an ambulance was called.

Advertisement

A call handler instructed that CPR should be started but this was to no avail – and when the ambulance arrived Ms Montgomery was pronounced dead at 2.48pm.

Ms McCullough that when the PSNI arrived, it was clear “there had been an attempt to clean up the scene.”

A post-mortem conducted on June 29 concluded that Ms Montgomery’s death was due to a head injury consistent with blunt force trauma.

It was concluded that Ms Montgomery was subjected to a sustained blunt force trauma assault involving the minimum of 59 applications.

Advertisement

It was also determined that baby Liam died as a result of oxygen deprivation caused by his mother’s death.

Setting out the relevant background leading to the murder, Ms McCullough said that around the end of May 2025 Ms Montgomery found out Hughes’s fiancée was pregnant.

As she question him about this over the coming weeks, Hughes denied the pregnancy and said his fiancée was ‘just fat.’

Advertisement

Due to her suspicions, Ms Montgomery started recording her conversations with Hughes.

He initially told Ms Montgomery his fiancée was not pregnant ‘any more’ then on June 13 he falsely claimed his fiancée has lost the baby in a traffic accident.

On June 15 Ms Montgomery sent Hughes a photo of a blue water bottle bearing the word ‘Dad’ which was a Father’s Day gift from their daughters.

Ms McCullough said: “This bottle was used as a murder weapon and was later discovered by police amongst items he had discarded.”

Advertisement

On June 20 Hughes told Ms Montgomery he was ending his relationship with his fiancée and that he wanted to sort things out with her and be able to see his daughters.

Ms Montgomery remained suspicious and after calling Hughes’s mother, it was confirmed his fiancée was pregnant.

Just before 9am on June 27 Ms Montgomery sent Hughes a message informing him she knew his fiancée was still pregnant, to which he replied ‘we need to talk about this and not over the phone.’

Ms Montgomery’s friends knew that Hughes was due to call to her house that day and the last contact any of them had with her was at 1.33pm on June 27.

Advertisement

Messages sent from one friend later that day and evening went unanswered which prompted the friend to call at her flat the following afternoon but there was no response when she knocked at the door.

When she called back later that day, she encountered the Emergency Services at the flat.

An investigation was launched and CCTV footage was obtained from a neighbouring flat.

Advertisement

This showed Hughes entering Ms Montgomery’s flat at 1.33pm and their eldest daughter exiting the flat at 1.37pm then sitting in Hughes car alone for around 30 minutes.

The CCTV also picked up Hughes leaving the flat at 2.07 carrying a Smyths Toys bag. After this, he picked up his youngest daughter from school and left Donaghadee.

Other evidence examined by police was a recording Ms Montgomery made when Hughes was in her flat.

On the recording, they discussed the fiancée’s pregnancy with Hughes saying he lied to her as he was worried he wouldn’t see the girls again.

Advertisement

At the end of the recording, Sarah is heard saying ‘Jesus’ then screaming ‘Zak’ several times.

The sounds of striking can be heard and the final 24 seconds of the clip is the sound of Ms Montgomery screaming.

After the fatal beating, Hughes stopped at Ards Shopping Centre where he bought a change of clothes in Primark

He also took her phone which he dumped in bushes at B&Q at Holywood Exchange alongside a lanyard with two house keys which bore Ms Montgomery’s blood.

Advertisement

Hughes also dumped the blood-stained dented water bottle and a wooden brush shaft which police believe were the murder weapons.

At 6.17pm, Hughes sent a message to Ms Montgomery’s phone about their daughter being sick.

This, Ms McCullough said, was sent “knowing that Sarah was dead or dying at the time.”

He then sent a picture to her phone at 7.20pm of him and the two girls.

Advertisement

The following day, Hughes and his two daughters attended a baby shower for his pregnant fiancée’s baby.

Hughes was arrested at 9.50pm on Saturday June 28 at a relative’s address in Ballyhalbert where injuries to his right hand were noted.

He gave an initial account of Friday June 27 when he claimed he went to the flat to collect his daughter and was there for between five to ten minutes before leaving.

During a further interview on July 1, Hughes admitted killing Ms Montgomery.

Advertisement

In a statement he said that after talking about the pregnancy, she pushed him and told him he would not see the girls again and he hit her with his water bottle.

This, Ms McCullough said, was a lie given what was picked up in the recording.

Hughes also told police “I didn’t mean to kill her.”

Concluding the Crown’s case, Ms McCullough said: “This brutal murder of an innocent, vulnerable, heavily pregnant single mother was the senseless result of the defendant’s failure to be a normal decent human being.”

Advertisement

She added that Hughes “cheated on women, lied to Ms Montgomery and when confronted was “too weak to admit his wrongdoings.

“After he savagely beat and murdered Sarah Montgomery, while she screamed out to him for mercy, he left her and their unborn child dead or dying in her flat.

“This cold-blooded, sustained, murderous attack, which included beating and beating for about 19 minutes … carried out for so little reason, must be viewed as one of the worst cases of domestic violence in recent years.”

Defence barrister Charles MacCreanor KC then addressed Lady Justice McBride and said nothing he said “could take away from the fact this is a horrific case” which caused a “high level of harm.”

Advertisement

Mr MacCreanor pointed out a lack of planning and pre-meditation compared to other cases including the death of pregnant Lurgan woman Natalie McNally.

He added that Hughes’s guilty plea to charges of murder and causing the destruction of her unborn child proved he had “faced up” and “accepted full responsibility” at an early stage.

After listening to submissions from both the Crown and defence, the senior judge said she wanted time to reflect on what she had heard.

She re-listed the case for review next Friday when it is hoped that a date will be set for the Tariff hearing.

Advertisement

This hearing will determine how long Hughes will spend in prison before he is considered eligible for release.

At the conclusion of today’s hearing, Hughes was returned to custody ahead of the Tariff hearing.

For all the latest news, visit the Belfast Live homepage here and sign up to our daily newsletter.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Devastating untold story of Tom Brady and Gisele Bundchen’s marriage: Read every ugly detail, the secret letter stashed in a drawer… and her savage last three words that left him so ruined, friends feared he had cancer

Published

on

Devastating untold story of Tom Brady and Gisele Bundchen's marriage: Read every ugly detail, the secret letter stashed in a drawer... and her savage last three words that left him so ruined, friends feared he had cancer

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Man City verdict LIVE: Premier League club found guilty of 114 charges as rivals ‘consider legal action’

Published

on

Daily Mirror

Rui Pinto, the whistleblower from Football Leaks, has taken to X with his reaction to the City verdict.

He said: “A historic decision for English football, and one that comes to crown the work I carried out through Football Leaks.

“Today, we all know that, through structural manipulation and financial manoeuvring, Manchester City did not merely circumvent the rules, they turned them into a mere formality, challenging any attempt to preserve the integrity of the competition.

Advertisement

“That meticulously orchestrated fraud will finally be subject to punishment, and the impact will not merely be turbulent, but truly devastating for the Cityzens. Ironically, I cannot help but remember Pep Guardiola’s words at his first press conference as City manager: ‘Fasten your seat belts’.”

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Why far-right protesters target non-political groups like lifeboat volunteers

Published

on

Why far-right protesters target non-political groups like lifeboat volunteers

On September 6 2026, two Royal National Lifeboat Institution (RNLI) lifeboats brought around 120 migrants ashore at Portsmouth. They were met by a protest, where far-right demonstrators verbally abused lifeboat crew. The crew’s names, addresses and photographs were later circulated online.

The protest in the Eastney area of the city was organised by Patriot Platform, a far-right group led by Daniel Thomas. Demonstrators blocked roads and clashed with police, and RNLI volunteers were branded “traitors”.

Four days later, Portsmouth RNLI Station was out of service, with contingency cover from stations further along the coast. At the time of writing, it remained closed.

In a separate incident, Thomas pleaded not guilty to criminal damage after allegedly slashing a migrant dinghy in the English Channel. He was remanded in custody and will appear at Portsmouth Crown Court on September 29.

Advertisement



À lire aussi :
What Patriot Platform tells us about how the far right in the UK is changing its tactics


The RNLI is a charity whose mission is to save lives at sea – any lives. Since 1824, its volunteers have saved more than 146,000 people. In 2025 alone, RNLI lifeboats launched 9,058 times. Only 109 callouts involved small boats carrying migrants in the Channel, yet these now appear to have become synonymous with debates around border control and sovereignty.

The remaining 98.8% of those rescued were swimmers, sailors, children in difficulty and people who had fallen from cliffs. The RNLI receives no direct government funding, and 97% of operational crew are volunteers.

The Eastney episode has revealed a fragility. That is, that the willingness of volunteers to undertake this rescue work can be withdrawn and an essential, life-saving service that has been viewed as a mainstay of UK emergency response might be lost.

Advertisement

The UK Search and Rescue Framework describes the RNLI as a voluntary organisation, deployed by HM Coastguard. The framework assumes the charity, its volunteers and the communities that sustain it will continue as they are.

This assumption is now being tested. The attack on Portsmouth RNLI was not an attack on government policy. The people targeted were not politicians or officials, but volunteers who respond in any conditions, at any time, to help strangers.

Research on far-right movements has mapped how these dynamics work. It shows that far-right groups target non-political associations, sports clubs and community groups precisely because they are trusted and embedded in local life. If far-right groups can capture or intimidate the institutions that communities rely on, they may be able to reshape the boundaries of what is considered normal.

Saving lives is the only objective

The Eastney episode also shares a similar modus operandi with far-right vigilantism on Europe’s southern borders. What makes Portsmouth distinctive is that the target was not a political organisation but a rescue service. The RNLI takes no position on migration policy. Its only mission is to save lives at sea.

Advertisement

When protesters labelled its volunteers traitors, they were not objecting to a political stance. They were objecting to the act of rescue itself – or rather to the identities of those being rescued.

Research into the UK water rescue community, examined how water rescue practitioners, bridging strategy and operations, understand their role. UK search and rescue practitioners consistently cited the ever-changing attitudes towards water rescue and the connection to political and public willingness to support, and thus pay for, operations.

These factors contribute to longstanding funding and resourcing challenges that can lead to a shortages of equipment and capability.

The study also found that navigating the bureaucracy of water rescue relies on search and rescue personnel across organisations knowing one another and sharing an understanding of the water environment. This cohesion is precisely what the far-right attack disrupts.

Advertisement

The closure of the Portsmouth station is not, on the face of it, a catastrophe. Other stations can cover the area. However, contingency plans are designed for equipment failures, staff shortages and weather disruptions. When the people who staff a service are also members of the community, the boundary between professional obligation and personal risk blurs. Paid staff can be directed. Volunteers cannot. If wearing a RNLI jacket makes you a target in your own community, the calculation changes.

The implications extend well beyond Portsmouth. Mountain rescue teams, coastguard rescue teams, lowland search and rescue teams and flood rescue units all rely on the same model of community-based volunteering. They are also, by their nature, exposed to the same fragilities revealed at Eastney, even while they are presumed to be permanent mainstays of emergency response available to all.

Volunteers can head out to sea on rescues from the age of 17.

But there has been some good news. The RNLI reported a significant increase in donations following the reporting of the abuse. However, it has also been faced with calls for donor support to be withdrawn.

The RNLI has advised volunteers to consider not wearing branded clothing and to feel empowered to close stations if they feel at risk. This underlines their role as volunteers, who have the discretion to withdraw voluntary service that statutory emergency services do not.

Advertisement

The far-right action that closed the Portsmouth station did not need to succeed entirely. It only needed to make the volunteers pause, to make the community hesitate, to make the cost of service feel higher than it did before. The rest can be left to attrition.

The RNLI’s mission is to save everyone, including activists who put themselves at risk. The question now is whether communities are willing to save the RNLI.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Benetton v Dragons Live: Team news, kick-off time and score updates

Published

on

Wales Online

The Dragons get their season underway on Friday evening with a trip to Italy.

Filo Tiatia’s side take on Benetton at Stadio Monigo, with the Men of Gwent coming up against a familiar face. Former Wales fly-half Rhys Patchell is the new attack coach at the Italian side, having been part of the Dragons’ coaching team last season.

Having shown signs of improvement last season, the Dragons have set a target of reaching the play-offs this season.

Advertisement

The match kicks off at 7.45pm, with Premier Sport broadcasting the curtain-raiser.

Or you can follow the match in the live blog below.

Benetton: Matt Gallagher; Ignacio Mendy, Francois Carlo Mey, Paolo Odogwu, Onisi Ratave; Jacob Umaga, Andy Uren; Matias Medrano, Bautista Bernasconi, Simone Ferrari, Mattia Midena, Federico Ruzza, Giulio Marini, Manuel Zuliani, Sebastian Negri (c).

Replacements: Nicholas Gasperini, Ivan Nemer, Marcos Gallorini, Piero Gritti, Antony-Italo Miranda, Siua Maile, Louis Werchon, Jean Smith.

Advertisement

Dragons RFC: Huw Anderson; Rio Dyer, Fine Inisi, Aneurin Owen (cc), Anzelo Tuitavuki; Tinus de Beer, Rhodri Williams; Rodrigo Martinez, Oli Burrows, Chris Coleman, Barny Langton-Cryer, Seb Davies, Ryan Woodman, Thomas Young (cc), Evan Minto

Replacements: Elliot Dee, Wyn Jones, Robert Hunt, Shane Lewis-Hughes, Harry Beddall, Che Hope, Jac Lloyd, Fetuli Paea

Live updates below:

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

New Strictly host Johannes Radebe jokes he has ‘a few notes’ about Emma Willis and Josh Widdicombe dancing skills after their presenting debut

Published

on

Johannes Radebe has revealed he 'has a few notes' about his Strictly Come Dancing co-hosts Emma Willis and Josh Widdicombe's dancing skills

Johannes Radebe has revealed he ‘has a few notes’ about his Strictly Come Dancing co-hosts Emma Willis and Josh Widdicombe’s dancing skills, after they made their debut as presenters on Saturday.

The revamped line-up failed to deliver the ratings boost BBC bosses had hoped for, while fans questioned the ‘awkward’ three-presenter format.

Ahead of the first live show on Saturday, Johannes offered his advice for the new professional dancers, and joked he had some thoughts on Emma and Josh’s dancing.

He said: ‘Dancing was the easy bit! That’s my natural habitat. Give me choreography, a pair of heels and some sequins and I know exactly what to do.

Advertisement

‘Emma and Josh, on the other hand… I may have had a few notes! Although I tried very hard not to become that professional dancer who is giving everybody corrections when nobody has asked.

‘I think my main advice was just to enjoy it and commit. On Strictly, you cannot do anything by halves. 

Johannes Radebe has revealed he ‘has a few notes’ about his Strictly Come Dancing co-hosts Emma Willis and Josh Widdicombe’s dancing skills

Advertisement
The revamped line-up failed to deliver the ratings boost BBC bosses had hoped for, while fans questioned the 'awkward' three-presenter format

The revamped line-up failed to deliver the ratings boost BBC bosses had hoped for, while fans questioned the ‘awkward’ three-presenter format

‘If you’re going to dance, DANCE. And if you’re going to wear the sequins, wear all of them!’

He added: ‘Emma is such a formidable broadcaster. She has this incredible ability to make everything look effortless, while being incredibly precise and prepared. 

‘And Joshy is just brilliantly funny, he has this wonderful ability to find the joke without forcing it.

Advertisement

‘For me, it’s been about finding our rhythm as a trio. I’m learning so much from both of them, and I think we bring very different energies to the show. That’s what makes it exciting.’

Johannes then shared his advice for the new professional dancers that have joined the show, adding: ‘Enjoy every second of it. Seriously.

‘It’s easy when you’re new to think you have to prove yourself immediately, but you don’t. Be curious, work hard, listen, ask questions and find your own identity.

‘And remember that being a Strictly Professional is about so much more than being a brilliant dancer. You’re a teacher, a performer, a storyteller, and a partner.

Advertisement

‘Most importantly, protect the joy. This is a very special place to work.’

Ahead of the first live show on Saturday, Johannes offered his advice for the new professional dancers, and joked he had some thoughts on Emma and Josh's dancing

Ahead of the first live show on Saturday, Johannes offered his advice for the new professional dancers, and joked he had some thoughts on Emma and Josh’s dancing 

On Saturday the celebrity couples will take to the Strictly dancefloor for the first time in a live show, with each receiving a score out of 40 from the judges

On Saturday the celebrity couples will take to the Strictly dancefloor for the first time in a live show, with each receiving a score out of 40 from the judges

The professional dancers will also perform a spell-binding group routine, which was pre-recorded earlier this summer

The professional dancers will also perform a spell-binding group routine, which was pre-recorded earlier this summer

Advertisement
This year's Strictly pairings were revealed last week in a hilarious new format, and they will make their dancefloor debut this weekend

This year’s Strictly pairings were revealed last week in a hilarious new format, and they will make their dancefloor debut this weekend

On Saturday the celebrity couples will take to the Strictly dancefloor for the first time in a live show, with each receiving a score out of 40 from the judges.

This year has been a new era for the ballroom show, with the introduction of its new hosts and a pivot to TikTok content in a bid to draw in younger viewers.

The BBC have already announced a new show, Strictly: Lights Up, which will air on BBC iPlayer every Sunday night after the results show has finished.

Advertisement

It will be hosted by TikTok comedian Abi Clarke, 30, and presenter Tyler West, 30, who competed on the show back in 2022. 

Abi is thought to appeal to a younger audience after she achieved fame through her viral comedy sketches on TikTok.

The spin-off will see the pair get the immediate reactions from the night’s eliminated couple, their dance off opponents and interview the judges, new hosts, other Strictly stars and studio guests. 

The new spin-offs are part of a huge shake-up for the series. After a massive bloodbath of seasoned pros, five new professional dancers have been introduced. 

Advertisement

Bosses have also pivoted to sign stars that will help bring the show into the social media age.

On Saturday, the pre-recorded launch show peaked at 5.8million viewers, according to overnight figures, up slightly on last year’s peak of 5.6million. 

However, the episode averaged at 5.3million viewers, down from 5.4million a year ago. 

While the peak figure represents a small rise on last year, it remains well below the figures recorded before the programme was hit by a series of controversies.

Advertisement

This includes allegations about the treatment of celebrity contestants and the culture behind the scenes, leading to the departure of professional dancers Giovanni Pernice and Graziano Di Prima and prompting the BBC to introduce tougher welfare measures.

Prior to the string of scandals, the Strictly launch peaked at 6.7 million viewers and averaged 6.3 million in 2023.

Bosses will have hoped that a fresh format and new hosting line-up could tempt lapsed viewers back to the BBC One favourite. However, the overnight figures suggest the changes have yet to produce a significant ratings resurgence.

Pre-recorded last week, the episode opened with a dance number from the professionals, including the five new dancers, as well as the judges and the new hosts.

Advertisement

The 15 nervous celebrities also found out who they will be dancing with for, potentially, 13 weeks as they vie for the Glitterball trophy.

The trio have taken over from Tess Daly and Claudia, who left the BBC show at the end of the 2025 series.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending