Entertainment value is a subjective quality among different audiences, and the biggest discrepancy between fans and cinephiles is what constitutes “fun.” Although the term “fun” can be used in an almost disparaging way to describe or defend lazy blockbuster or franchise films that exist only to satisfy Internet commenters, cinema was created as a form of entertainment as much as it was a form of art, and there is no shame in making something that is unabashedly entertaining. The aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic and the consequences that it had on the global box office has ensured that pure escapism is more desired than ever before, especially when audiences are seeking escapism. Although the box office has taken some significant hits in recent years due to factors that are beyond the control of any one studio, there does seem to be a conscious desire from audiences to turn cinemagoing into a communal experience once more.
There is a difference between films that are “fun” and “funny,” as there’s entertainment value in crowd pleasers that don’t necessarily need to be treated as outright comedies; this is of course complicated by the fact that Hollywood doesn’t frequently churn out midbudget comedies anymore, as they are more common to become streaming shows. At the same time, the industry has oddly begun to treat its blockbusters less like escapist entertainment and more like important pieces of narrative franchise building. When every film is simply a building block that is intended to tease whatever comes next in a cinematic universe, it can be harder to enjoy them as individual sections. There’s no rhyme or reason that describes what a “fun” film could be, but a discerning cinephile can usually point it out when they see it.
Advertisement
6
‘Licorice Pizza’ (2021)
Cooper Hoffman and Alana Haim as Gary and Alana running down the street in Licorice Pizza.Image via United Artists
Licorice Pizzais a throwback to the San Fernando Valley-set dark comedies that Paul Thomas Anderson made early on within his career, but it’s not nearly as emotionally crushing as Boogie Nights or Magnolia. Anderson has always understood how to write irascible, energetic young people who dream farther than they can see, and Licorice Pizza is an uproarious romantic comedy that uses Los Angeles of the ‘70s as a playground to explore multiple avenues of popular culture. It’s one of the more unusual romantic comedies of the past 25 years, but it’s also one of the most honest and sincere; Anderson is unparalleled in his ability to take note of up-and-coming talent and give them opportunities, and the discovery of Cooper Hoffman and Alana Haim made Licorice Pizza far more entertaining than it would have been with two established actors cast.
Licorice Pizza plays out like a series of memories, and the segmented, free-flowing progression of events makes for a wonderful string of anecdotes that capture all the highs and lows of a single summer. Although there are a number of great cameos and brief appearances by more established names, Bradley Cooper’s role as Jon Peters is arguably the funniest that he has been since The Hangover.
Advertisement
5
‘Hit Man’ (2024)
Adria Arjona as Madison, wearing glasses and earmuffs next to Glen Powell in ‘Hit Man’.Image via Netflix
Hit Manis a deviation for Richard Linklaterbecause it was the first time he was working in the espionage dark comedy subgenre, even if it was based on a Texas Monthly article in the same way that his underrated 2011 film Bernie was. Hit Man works because it is a film about audience expectations that explores how silly the fundamentals of cinema would be if they were taken seriously; Glen Powell stars as a geeky college professor who goes undercover as various fake assassins in order to help law enforcement catch those who would hire a hit man, but he ends up getting in too deep when he falls for a woman (Adria Arjona) who wants to actually have her abusive husband killed. It’s a startling effective romantic-comedy that doubles as a subversive noir, with Arjona perfectly embodying the persona of a modern femme fatale.
Hit Man signified that Powell was a true talent on the rise who was interested in transforming himself physically in order to wear different disguises, which is something that he would do once again in Chad Powers and The Running Man. It’s nonetheless an impressive achievement on Linklater’s part that Hit Man retains the “hangout” sensibilities of his best work, all whilst taking some dark twists.
Advertisement
4
‘Challengers’ (2024)
Art, Tashi, and Patrick sitting on a bed laughing in Challengers.Image via Amazon MGM Studios
Challengersexists within several genres that Hollywood has declined to thoughtfully develop in recent years, as it’s a gripping sports film, a twisty erotic thriller, and a hilarious romantic comedy about three highly motivated, competitive people who can’t help but be drawn to one another. Luca Guadagnino has certainly made films that are more existentialist and weird, but Challengers is an unabashed work of populist entertainment that features better craftsmanship than anything else this decade. Between the absorbing camerawork, the hypnotic editing, and the instantly iconic musical score, Challengers is a burst of momentum that crashes competing ambitions into one another.
Challengers is a perfect sports film that doesn’t require existing knowledge of tennis to be enjoyed, but does show enough nuance in its exploration of the sport to suggest that Guadagnino did his research. It’s also the rare love triangle film where there isn’t an obviously misplaced party in play, as there is reason to equally invest in the performances by Zendaya, Josh O’Connor, and Mike Faist.
Advertisement
Collider Exclusive · Oscar Best Picture Quiz Which Oscar Best Picture Is Your Perfect Movie? Parasite · Everything Everywhere · Oppenheimer · Birdman · No Country
Advertisement
Five Oscar Best Picture winners. Five completely different visions of what cinema can be — and what it can do to you. One of them is the film that was made for the way your mind works. Ten questions will figure out which one.
🪜Parasite
🌀Everything Everywhere
☢️Oppenheimer
🐦Birdman
Advertisement
🪙No Country for Old Men
Advertisement
01
What kind of film experience do you actually want? The best movies don’t just entertain — they leave something behind.
Advertisement
02
Which idea grabs you most in a film? Great films are driven by a central obsession. What’s yours?
Advertisement
03
How do you like your story told? Form is content. The way a story is shaped changes what it means.
Advertisement
04
What makes a truly great antagonist? The opposition defines the protagonist. What kind of opposition fascinates you?
Advertisement
05
What do you want from a film’s ending? The final note is the one that lingers. What do you want it to sound like?
Advertisement
06
Which setting pulls you in most? Where a film takes place shapes everything — mood, stakes, what’s even possible.
Advertisement
07
What cinematic craft impresses you most? Every great film has a signature — a technical or artistic element that makes it unmistakable.
Advertisement
08
What kind of main character do you root for? The protagonist is the lens. Who you choose to follow says something about you.
Advertisement
09
How do you feel about a film that takes its time? Pace is a choice. Some films sprint; others let tension accumulate slowly, deliberately.
Advertisement
10
What do you want to feel walking out of the cinema? The best films leave a mark. What kind of mark do you want?
Advertisement
The Academy Has Decided Your Perfect Film Is…
Your answers have pointed to one Oscar Best Picture winner above all others. This is the film that was made for the way your mind works.
Advertisement
Parasite
You are drawn to films that operate on multiple levels simultaneously — that begin in one genre and quietly, brilliantly migrate into another. Bong Joon-ho’s Parasite is a film about class, desire, and the architecture of inequality that manages to be darkly funny, deeply suspenseful, and genuinely shocking across a single extraordinary running time. Your instinct is for cinema that hides its true intentions until the moment it’s ready to reveal them. Parasite is exactly that — a film that rewards close attention and punishes assumptions, right up to its devastating final image.
Advertisement
Everything Everywhere All at Once
You want it all — and this film gives you all of it. The Daniels’ Everything Everywhere All at Once is one of the most maximalist films ever made: action comedy, multiverse sci-fi, family drama, existential crisis, and a genuinely earned emotional core that sneaks up on you amid the chaos. You are someone who responds to ambition, who doesn’t want cinema to choose between being entertaining and being meaningful. This film refuses that choice entirely. It is overwhelming by design, and its overwhelming nature is precisely the point — because the feeling of being crushed by infinite possibility is exactly what it’s about.
Advertisement
Oppenheimer
You are drawn to cinema on a grand scale — films that understand history not as a backdrop but as a force, and that place their characters inside that force and watch what happens. Christopher Nolan’s Oppenheimer is a film about the terrifying gap between what we can do and what we should do, told with the full weight of one of the most consequential moments in human history behind it. You want your films to feel important without feeling self-important — to earn their ambition through sheer craft and the gravity of their subject. Oppenheimer does exactly that. It is enormous, complicated, and refuses easy comfort.
Advertisement
Birdman
You are drawn to films that foreground their own construction — that make the how of the filmmaking part of the what it’s about. Alejandro González Iñárritu’s Birdman, shot to appear as a single continuous take, is cinema examining itself through the cracked mirror of a fading actor’s ego. You respond to formal daring, to the feeling that a film is doing something that probably shouldn’t be possible. Michael Keaton’s performance and Emmanuel Lubezki’s restless camera create something genuinely unlike anything else — a film that is simultaneously about creativity, relevance, self-destruction, and the impossibility of ever truly knowing if your work means anything at all.
Advertisement
No Country for Old Men
You are drawn to cinema that trusts silence, that refuses to explain itself, and that treats dread as a form of meaning. The Coen Brothers’ No Country for Old Men is a film about the arrival of a new kind of evil — implacable, arbitrary, and utterly indifferent to the moral frameworks we use to make sense of the world. It is one of the most formally controlled films ever made, and its controlled restraint is what makes it so terrifying. You want your films to haunt you, not comfort you. You are not interested in resolution if resolution would be dishonest. No Country for Old Men is honest in a way that most cinema never dares to be.
Advertisement
3
‘Top Gun: Maverick’ (2022)
Tom Cruise driving a motorcycle at a high speed in Top Gun: Maverick (2022)Image via Paramount Pictures
Advertisement
Top Gun: Maverickis the sequel that seemed like it would never be madebecause of the decades of rumors and tragic passing of original director Tony Scott, which seemed to rule out the possibility of Tom Cruise ever returning to reprise his role as Pete Mitchcell. Although it would have been very easy for Top Gun: Maverick to fall into the same trap that had doomed several other legacy sequels that essentially just played out as lazy recreations, Joseph Kosinski molded a perfect reboot because it saw Maverick transitioning into become a mentor figure to the group of young pilots, including Rooster (Miles Teller), the son of his former best friend Goose (Anthony Edwards).
Cruise proves again why he is one of the best movie stars of all-time, but Top Gun: Maverick also managed to identify some of the other rising talents out there, including Powell, Monica Barbaro, and Lewis Pullman.
2
‘Project Hail Mary’ (2026)
Grace and Rockyat the end of Project Hail MaryImage via Amazon MGM Studios
Advertisement
Project Hail Maryis a perfect modern take on the space opera adventurebecause it is, ironically enough, a film about humanity where the main character is isolated from the rest of Earth on a mission to deep space. Although science fiction has become a genre in which there is far more “doom and gloom” than optimism about what the future can hold, Project Hail Mary takes an appropriate approach of recognizing the problems that mankind faces and telling an inspirational story about people of different backgrounds coming together to do something for the collective good of life itself. It’s a perfect companion piece to The Martian, another film based on a sci-fi novel from author Andy Weir that was adapted by Drew Goddard. It’s one of the many recent films that truly demands the scope of IMAX projection, showing that a film of this size can still contain a tremendous amount of artistry.
The key to the success of Project Hail Mary is the sincere connection between its two leads, as Ryan Gosling makes for an empathetic, funny teacher-turned-astronaut, and James Ortiz created one of the greatest modern puppet characters with Rocky. That such a big film is staked on such a simple and sincere connection is tremendously brave, but it’s a reminder of just how sharp writer/directors Phil Lord and Chris Miller can be (and begs the question of what their version of Solo: A Star Wars Story would have looked like). Although Project Hail Mary isn’t a spoof, as it includes some deeply emotional and harrowing moments, it’s nearly impossible to get to the end of the film without breaking out into a smile.
1
‘Splitsville’ (2025)
Adria Arjona as Ashley looking over her right shoulder at herself in a black backless dress in SplitsvilleImage via Neon
Advertisement
Splitsvilleis one of the most audacious and uproarious original comedies of the decade because it unleashed the potential of the writer/director team of Michael Angelo Covino and Kyle Marvin, who also co-star in the film as best friends who become involved in the others’ respective spouses, played by Adria Arjona and Dakota Johnson. What begins as a hilarious look at male insecurity becomes an increasingly absurdist farce that involves sabotage, scandal, and one of the most surprisingly well-staged fight scenes there has been in a comedy film in quite some time.
Splitsville is equally sympathetic and searing with its characters, as it thoroughly understands the complexities of a longstanding relationship where certain truths become questioned. Although neither character ends up looking particularly good, Splitsville revels in the fact that the characters are sincerely emotional and not bottled up. Thanks to creative needle drops and some brilliant staging of setpieces, Splitsville is a European-styled comedy that examines the absurdity of the modern American social hierarchy.
Marvel Studios has already assembled one of the biggest superhero casts ever for Avengers: Doomsday, but apparently, we still don’t know everyone who will appear.
During a Q&A following a screening of Avengers: Endgame Encore, co-director Anthony Russo revealed that Marvel has yet to announce the complete cast for the upcoming Avengers film.
“The cast is so large, and we’ve announced some of the cast, and we haven’t announced some of the cast,” Russo said. “I get confused myself over who we’ve announced and not announced, so I have to just slow down.”
That’s an interesting tease considering just how enormous the confirmed lineup already is.
Advertisement
Robert Downey Jr. will lead the film as Victor Von Doom, alongside returning MCU stars including Chris Hemsworth, Chris Evans, Anthony Mackie, Sebastian Stan, Tom Hiddleston, Paul Rudd, Letitia Wright, Florence Pugh and Simu Liu.
The Fantastic Four are also joining the fight, with Pedro Pascal, Vanessa Kirby, Joseph Quinn and Ebon Moss-Bachrach appearing as Marvel’s First Family.
Robert Downey Jr. as Doctor Doom [Marvel Studios]
Then there are the returning X-Men.
Advertisement
Patrick Stewart, Ian McKellen, James Marsden, Rebecca Romijn, Alan Cumming and Kelsey Grammer are among the veteran Marvel stars confirmed to appear, while Channing Tatum will return as Gambit.
Hayley Atwell has also been confirmed to return as Peggy Carter.
Despite that massive lineup, several major Marvel names remain noticeably absent from the announced cast. Tom Holland, Hugh Jackman, Ryan Reynolds and Benedict Cumberbatch are among the characters fans have speculated could potentially appear, although Russo’s comments don’t confirm any of them.
For now, Marvel appears to be keeping at least a few surprises under wraps.
Advertisement
With Avengers: Doomsday bringing together the Avengers, Fantastic Four, X-Men and other corners of the MCU against Robert Downey Jr.’s Doctor Doom, there may still be some significant names waiting to join the battle.
Avengers: Doomsday hits theaters December 18, 2026.
TV fans today complaining about slow burns must have missed out on The X-Filescraze of the 1990s and early-2000s. The series was infamous for teasing a romance between its two protagonists — Agent Fox Moulder (David Duchovny) and Dr. Dana Scully (Gillian Anderson) — without ever defining their relationship. In fairness, the agents had other things to worry about. In fact, they were right in the middle of the show’s biggest serialized storyline when the producers finally allowed them to share a kiss on screen. This should have been a relief to fans, but many found it maddening. For one thing, the kiss came without much fanfare or commentary, and for another, it happened at the end of the show’s most ambitious installment to date.
Mulder and Scully’s first kiss on screen came in Season 7, Episode 4, “Millennium,” which first aired on November 28, 1999. At the time, the status of the X-Files as an official FBI assignment was unclear, but the duo were definitely supposed to be working on other issues for the bureau. While they continued trying to uncover conspiracies, this episode shoehorned them into a crossover with the series Millennium, which had recently been canceled. The result was a massive TV event that felt slightly out of place, and has left fans scratching their heads for over two decades.
Advertisement
‘Millennium’ Was Not Where Fans Expected the Mulder-Scully Kiss
gillian anderson david duchuvny the x filesImage via FOX
The chemistry between Duchovny and Anderson made it inevitable that fans would interpret Mulder and Scully as a romantic pairing, and The X-Files writers definitely encouraged that over the years. Still, by Season 7 many were beginning to doubt that the show would ever take a romantic turn and make their relationship canonical. “Millennium” was the 143rd episode of the series overall, and it seemed like too great a change to introduce at this point. The timing was also unexpected — a long-awaited kiss would most likely come in a season premiere or finale, or even in a movie, since the series had just gone to the big screen for the first time.
On top of that, “Millennium” was an episode where Mulder and Scully had to share their screen time with former FBI agent Frank Black (Lance Henriksen) for a crossover with the series Millennium. The X-Files and Millennium were both created and executive produced by Chris Carter, and both aired on Fox. Millennium was canceled abruptly in 1999, so Carter intended to use this X-Files episode to wrap up the show after the fact.
All in all, the episode was regarded as a failure by fans of both shows. It didn’t do much to tidy up the ending of Millennium, and Henriksen himself later admitted he was disappointed in it. It also pulled The X-Files off of its serialized story arc for a monster-of-the-week style episode, which felt like an interruption. To top it off, the Mulder-Scully kiss caught fans completely off-guard. It happened in a hospital in the aftermath of their adventure, with Millennium characters and other FBI agents all around them. The story took place on New Year’s Eve, and the two were watching the ball drop on TV in silence when they leaned in for a kiss.
Advertisement
“World didn’t end,” Mulder remarked in a reference to the episode and the Y2K panic. The kiss was not chaste or unromantic by any means, yet the lack of commentary here made some fans furious. They could no longer say that Mulder and Scully had never kissed, but this could also be dismissed as a New Year’s Eve moment with no real meaning. For those that wanted the show to resolve this relationship into a true on-screen romance, this was worse than nothing.
‘The X-Files’ Kept Its Romance Mysterious
Dana Scully (Gillian Anderson) and Fox Mulder (David Duchovny) on the job in ‘The X-Files’ episode “Leonard Betts”Image via Fox
The fans who felt let down by this episode had a lot more heartache coming. Later in this same season, the episode “All Things” opened on Mulder and Scully in bed, having apparently spent the night together. Even worse — once again the hook-up went uncommented-upon, indicating this wasn’t their first dalliance. Their relationship continued in this manner through the rest of the series and the revival as well. The series matter-of-factly showed us where Mulder and Scully were at from moment to moment, without ever lingering on their relationship or stopping to talk about it very much.
Advertisement
Love it or hate it, this phenomenon likely has a lot to do with the behind-the-scenes drama impacting the show in Season 7. The X-Files was a massive hit at this time, and its cast commanded massive influence. Starting in Season 6, the production moved from British Columbia, Canada to Los Angeles at Duchovny’s request. The actor wanted to stay closer to his home and his wife during the filming season, and he also wanted the chance to pursue other work when timing permitted. Anderson and others on the cast and crew agreed with him, but Carter opposed the move.
It turned out that there was bad blood brewing between Duchovny and Carter in Season 7. The actor sued 20th Century Fox during this time, claiming that the studio had undersold the rights to The X-Files, severely impacting his pay. This lawsuit was settled in Duchovny’s favor. According to the book Examinations: An Unauthorized Look at Seasons 6-9 of The X-Files by Tom Kessenich, the lawsuit revealed that Carter had known what Fox was doing all along, and chose not to warn Duchovny. Duchovny announced his intention to leave the show after Season 7, though he ended up taking a recurring role and eventually returned to the series full-time.
The X-Files was never a straightforward show in any way — including the romance between its protagonists, which was a central part for so many viewers. However, in the years since the original series ended, many online fandom communities have celebrated the show’s unique approach to romance and have relished the hunt for subtext and clues throughout its 200+ episodes. The X-Files is streaming now on Hulu in the U.S., and is also available on PlutoTV for free with ads.
Britney Spears is facing renewed criticism after a revealing dance video showed an apparent worker in the room while she performed for the camera. The clip, which was originally uploaded earlier this month before resurfacing across X, showed the pop star dancing in a revealing outfit as a man worked from a ladder behind her. At several points, Spears appeared to expose herself, with emojis strategically placed over parts of her body. The unusual scene prompted some viewers to question whether the man was comfortable being present, while others went further and accused Spears of behaving inappropriately toward an employee.
Britney Spears Dances As Worker Stands In The Room
In the 45-second video, Spears, 44, danced around what appeared to be a room inside her home while wearing a sparkling silver dress with mesh details. A man could be seen standing on a ladder near the windows as the singer moved around the room and occasionally approached the chair positioned beneath him. The man briefly looked back at Spears while she continued dancing. News.com.au described him as an apparent worker but could not confirm his identity or employment status. Spears disabled comments on the original Instagram post, but that did not prevent the footage from spreading elsewhere. A repost from Pop Fusion HQ attracted more than 1.4 million views as users debated whether the interaction was merely awkward or crossed a professional boundary.
Britney Spears Told She ‘Desperately Needs Help’
Conservatorship ended nearly 5 years ago and all she has done since is spin around and act like a cracked out prostitute. She desperately needs help but her fans would rather act like her behaviour is relatable and normal https://t.co/4m0nZ0wcfh
The video quickly generated concern about Spears’ behavior, with one particularly harsh commenter claiming that she “desperately needs help.” Another viewer asked why Spears continues posting similar dance videos and wondered what she is attempting to communicate through them.
“What’s she sick with? Because it’s not normal to do that,” a third user wrote. Others pushed back against the crueler reactions and argued that mocking Spears or attempting to diagnose her from a social-media clip was not helpful.
Advertisement
“Of course she needs help. She’s seriously unwell. But your disgusting comments aren’t helpful at all,” one supporter wrote, criticizing the degrading language used against the singer. Another user argued that placing Spears under another restrictive conservatorship would not constitute appropriate help. The conflicting reactions turned the discussion into a broader argument about where concern ends and online cruelty begins.
Some users characterized Spears’ behavior as possible harassment because the apparent worker remained in the room while she exposed herself and performed suggestively. One Reddit commenter argued that an employer behaving that way around a staff member could create an uncomfortable power imbalance. Another noted that confidentiality agreements would not excuse illegal workplace behavior. However, other users rejected the accusation as an overreaction.
Another pointed out that no one knows what arrangements may have existed before the video was filmed or whether the man was bothered by Spears’ behavior.
Beyond the more serious accusations, viewers were also curious about why the man appeared to be covering or working near the windows while Spears filmed. One Reddit user wondered whether he had been completing legitimate work at the property or whether Spears wanted the windows covered for privacy. The same person speculated that he might be a housekeeper who had previously appeared in the background of her videos.
Some commenters attempted to make light of the uncomfortable-looking situation, joking about what the worker might have told his family when he returned home. The man largely appeared focused on the task in front of him, although he occasionally seemed to glance toward Spears as she moved around behind him.
The resurfaced video also prompted users to revisit earlier allegations involving Spears and members of her staff. In 2010, former bodyguard Fernando Flores filed a lawsuit accusing the singer of repeatedly exposing herself and behaving inappropriately around him. Spears’ representatives denied his allegations at the time, and the case was later reportedly settled. In 2022, Spears sparked debate after sharing nude pool photos in which her assistant, Vicky T, held her “like a baby.” The Blast reported that fans joked about wanting Vicky’s job and its “employee benefits,” although Vicky never suggested that she felt uncomfortable.
The latest video has revived that discussion, but the apparent worker at the center of the footage has not spoken publicly. For now, the backlash is based entirely on what viewers believe they witnessed. Some saw a celebrity behaving inappropriately around someone working inside her home, while others saw another example of strangers making serious assumptions about Spears from a brief and context-free Instagram video.
Kevin Costner and Luke Grimes standing in front of a barn in Yellowstone, Coming Home.Image via Paramount Network
While his day-to-day involvement in the Yellowstonefranchise appears to be only tangential, Taylor Sheridan remains a vital asset for the Paramount+ streaming service. He’s currently in a transitional phase, having severed ties with Paramount and partnered with NBCUniversal, but several of his hit shows continue to air in his former streaming home. This year alone, Sheridan has released the brand-new neo-Western series The Madison, which has been renewed for a second season. He also expanded the Yellowstone franchise with two follow-ups, Marshals and Dutton Ranch. More recently, he delivered the third season of his spy thriller series Lioness, with the fourth season of his crime show Tulsa King lined up next. Around the same time, the Yellowstone franchise will continue its expansion with the return of its least-liked installment.
Tulsa King‘s fourth season is due out in October, with a spin-off titled Frisco King also in development. Before that, however, Marshals will return for a second season on CBS. It remains the only Yellowstone title to be conceived for network television, which is something that caught longtime fans off guard. Audiences weren’t expecting a procedural, having become accustomed to a sprawling neo-Western family saga over the last several years. The earlier spin-offs 1883 and 1923 set an even higher benchmark for future projects in the Yellowstone universe. Marshals, however, fell short of expectations — at least critically.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Collider Exclusive · Taylor Sheridan Universe Quiz Which Taylor Sheridan Show Do You Belong In? Yellowstone · Landman · Tulsa King · Mayor of Kingstown
Four worlds. All of them brutal, complicated, and built on power, loyalty, and the price of survival. Taylor Sheridan doesn’t write heroes — he writes people who do what they have to do and live with the cost. Ten questions will reveal which one of his worlds you were made for.
🤠Yellowstone
🛢️Landman
👑Tulsa King
Advertisement
⚖️Mayor of Kingstown
Advertisement
01
Where does your power come from? In Sheridan’s world, everyone has leverage. The question is what kind.
Advertisement
02
Who do you put first, no matter what? Loyalty in Sheridan’s universe is always absolute — and always costly.
Advertisement
03
Someone crosses a line. How do you respond? Every Sheridan protagonist has a line. What matters is what happens after it’s crossed.
Advertisement
04
Where do you feel most in your element? Sheridan’s worlds are as much about place as they are about people.
Advertisement
05
How do you feel about operating in the grey? Nobody in a Sheridan show has clean hands. The question is how they carry the dirt.
Advertisement
06
What are you actually fighting to hold onto? Every Sheridan character is fighting a war. The real question is what they’re defending.
Advertisement
07
How do you lead? Authority in Sheridan’s world is never given — it’s established, maintained, and constantly tested.
Advertisement
08
Someone new arrives and tries to change how things work. Your reaction? Every Sheridan show has an outsider disrupting an established order. Sometimes that outsider is you.
Advertisement
09
What has your position cost you? Nobody gets to where these characters are without paying for it. The bill is always personal.
Advertisement
10
When it’s over, what do you want people to say? Sheridan’s characters all know the ending is coming. The question is what they leave behind.
Advertisement
Sheridan Has Spoken You Belong In…
The show that claimed the most of your answers is the world you were built for. If two tied, both are shown — you’re complicated enough to straddle two Sheridan universes.
Advertisement
🤠 Yellowstone
🛢️ Landman
👑 Tulsa King
⚖️ Mayor of Kingstown
Advertisement
You are a Dutton — or you might as well be. You understand that some things are worth protecting at any cost, and that the modern world’s indifference to history, to land, to legacy, is not something you’re willing to accept quietly. You lead from the front, you carry your family’s weight without complaint, and when someone threatens what’s yours, you don’t escalate — you finish it. You’re not cruel. But you are absolute. In Yellowstone’s world, that combination of ferocity and loyalty doesn’t make you a villain. It makes you the only thing standing between everything that matters and everyone who wants to take it.
You thrive in the chaos of high-stakes negotiation, where the money is enormous, the margins are thin, and the wrong word in the wrong room can cost everyone everything. You’re a fixer — the person called when a situation is already on fire and needs someone with the nerve to walk into it. West Texas oil country rewards exactly what you are: sharp, adaptable, unsentimental, and absolutely clear-eyed about what people want and what they’ll do to get it. You’re not naive enough to think this world is fair. You’re smart enough to be the one deciding who it’s fair to.
Advertisement
You are a Dwight Manfredi — someone who has served their time, paid their dues, and arrived somewhere unexpected with nothing but their reputation and their wits. You adapt without losing yourself. You build loyalty through respect rather than fear, though you’re not above reminding people that the two aren’t mutually exclusive. Tulsa King is for people who are still standing when everyone assumed they’d be finished — who find, in an unfamiliar place, that they’re more capable than the world gave them credit for. You don’t need a throne. You build one, wherever you happen to land.
You carry the weight of a system that is broken by design, and you do it anyway — because someone has to, and because you’re the only one positioned to do it without the whole thing collapsing. Mike McLusky’s world is for people who are comfortable operating where there are no good options, only less catastrophic ones. You speak every language: law enforcement, criminal, political, human. That fluency makes you invaluable and it makes you a target. You’ve made your peace with both. Mayor of Kingstown belongs to people who understand that keeping the peace is not the same as being at peace — and who do the job regardless.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Taylor Sheridan Fans Are in for a Big October
It holds a 48% score on the aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, where the consensus reads, “Marshals confines Kayce Dutton within a dim procedural that lacks the narrative spark and intrigue that Yellowstone managed instantly, making this one ham-fisted trek.” Despite the poor reception, Marshals was a runaway ratings success during its initial run earlier this year, finding spots on the Nielsen charts for the entirety of the first season. Headlined by Luke Grimes and also featuring Logan Marshall-Green and Gil Birmingham, the series will return with its second season on October 4. The fourth season of Tulsa King, on the other hand, will debut on Paramount+ on October 16. Stay tuned to Collider for more updates.
Sydney Sweeney appears to be making her feelings about Scooter Braun clear after reports claimed she had been advised to end their relationship. The “Euphoria” actress included an intimate photograph of herself kissing Braun in a new end-of-summer photo dump, offering fans another glimpse into their increasingly public romance. The affectionate update arrives shortly after claims that a powerful Hollywood agent allegedly told Sweeney she needed to dump the former music executive if she wanted to be taken seriously as an actress and businesswoman.
Sydney Sweeney Shares Intimate Kiss With Scooter Braun
Sweeney closed out the season by sharing a carousel filled with highlights from her summer. The collection featured moments from camping, scuba diving, wakeboarding, and the Venice Film Festival. However, the photograph attracting the most attention showed Sweeney, 29, locking lips with Braun, 45. The intimate snap made it clear that he was part of the memories she wanted to share publicly, despite the scrutiny surrounding their romance.
“One last summer dump,” Sweeney reportedly captioned the collection. Although the actress did not directly address any breakup rumors or outside criticism, the photograph suggested that she and Braun remain firmly together.
Sydney Sweeney Was Reportedly Told To ‘Dump’ Scooter Braun
The romantic update comes after claims that Sweeney was advised to reconsider her relationship with Braun. The Blast previously reported that Hollywood agent Ari Emanuel allegedly told the actress she needed to end the romance if she wanted to be viewed seriously within the entertainment industry.
“Ari was telling her that if she wanted to be taken seriously as an actress and businesswoman, she needed to break up with Scooter,” a source claimed. Representatives for Emanuel strongly denied that the alleged conversation ever occurred. The warning was said to have been delivered before Sweeney left Paradigm Talent Agency and signed with Creative Artists Agency. Braun reportedly played a role in that career move by arranging a dinner between Sweeney and CAA agent Kevin Huvane. Whatever concerns may have been raised about the relationship, Sweeney’s latest post indicates that she has not allowed them to dictate her personal choices.
Scooter Braun Has Publicly Declared His Love For The Actress
Sweeney’s photograph follows Braun’s own highly public show of affection. The former talent manager celebrated her 29th birthday with a romantic tribute featuring footage of them dancing and kissing.
“Happy birthday to the woman who is the exception to every rule,” Braun wrote. He praised Sweeney for showing him what a “true partnership” could look like and said she made him “smile harder, laugh louder, adventure more, and dream bigger.”
Advertisement
Braun ended the message by declaring, “I love you,” and expressing his excitement about celebrating more milestones together. That tribute already presented the couple as happy and committed. Sweeney’s decision to include him in her latest carousel now adds another public display from her side of the relationship.
Sydney Sweeney And Scooter Braun’s Romance Has Grown Serious
Sweeney and Braun have reportedly been romantically involved since 2025, following her split from former fiancé Jonathan Davino. Their relationship initially attracted attention because of their 16-year age difference and Braun’s controversial reputation in the entertainment business. Braun previously managed stars including Justin Bieber and Ariana Grande before stepping away from talent management.
Despite the criticism, the romance has continued to become more serious. The pair has made several public appearances together, including during the Venice Film Festival, and Braun has reportedly introduced Sweeney to his children. Sources close to the couple have claimed that they are secure in their relationship and largely amused by the negative commentary surrounding it. One insider previously said Sweeney had “never been happier,” while another claimed Braun found speculation about their romance “comical.” Neither Sweeney nor Braun has indicated that the outside pressure has caused problems between them.
Sydney Sweeney Continues To Make Her Own Career Moves
The kiss photo also arrives as questions continue to surround Braun’s possible influence over Sweeney’s expanding career. The actress recently changed talent agencies and has continued building a business portfolio outside acting. Her lingerie company, SYRN, has generated significant attention through a string of provocative campaigns, while her partnership with sports prediction platform Novig sparked another major controversy. Braun has reportedly supported those ventures and helped connect Sweeney with powerful figures in Hollywood. However, observers remain divided over whether his involvement strengthens her career or risks overshadowing her accomplishments.
Sweeney’s latest post does not settle that wider debate. It does, however, undermine any suggestion that she is preparing to distance herself from Braun because of the criticism. Rather than hiding the romance, the actress chose to include their kiss among the defining moments of her summer. The intimate photograph suggests that whatever Hollywood insiders or online critics may think about the relationship, Sweeney and Braun are continuing it on their own terms.
Five seasons is no small miracle for a sitcom that feels like one of TV’s best-kept secrets. Fox’s Animal Control continues to blend the deliciously funny workplace chaos of Brooklyn Nine-Nine with the easy ensemble chemistry ofParks and Recreation. But amid the wild animal calls and shenanigans that give the series its own brand of nonsense from showrunners Bob Fisher, Rob Greenberg, and Dan Sterling, it’s also delivering one of its best seasons to date. After all, where else can you find a show that makes a puppy mill raid look like a Michael Bay movie, but ends with a $63 citation fee?
And maybe that’s the single-camera sitcom’s best part. The ensemble series led by Joel McHaleis still very good at creating that sharp turn of humor, proving it’s one of TV’s greatest underrated comedies. With the first two episodes of its newest season made available for review, Animal Control wastes no time reminding us how it continues to be one of the funniest, most genuine comedies on network television. While all the adorable creatures, great or small, still cause trouble for Seattle’s Northwest Seattle Division, it’s the wonderfully dysfunctional crew that will keep you watching.
Advertisement
What Is ‘Animal Control’ Season 5 About?
Image via Bettina Strauss/FOX
With Animal Control Director Emily (Vella Lovell) suspended after her relationship with Officer Shred (Michael Rowland) came to HR’s attention last season, the Northwest Seattle Division begins Season 5 short on patience and stuck with a boss nobody wants. Emily is still in the trenches, and by trenches, we mean hitting the highs of baking like it was the pandemic all over again. Her hearing is weeks away, but in the meantime, Templeton (GerryDee) is making himself comfortable in her office. It’s obviously bugging TF out of Frank (McHale), who leads the team in a work stoppage, though his determination to oust the new lead is tested when the Seattle Seahawks’ mascot goes missing.
Despite being told he is barred from the rescue operation and Templeton enlists Daisy (Kyla Pratt), the job brings out Frank’s best instincts and his worst impulses. But as the office curmudgeon tries to work with Templeton’s lackey, he realizes the team has a bigger problem ahead of them in the form of short king, Roman Park (Ken Jeong), whose private animal control agency is moving into city territory. Suddenly, things like low service scores carry more weight than they usually would, sending the team into a panic in Episode 2’s “Crows and Lizard Legs.” But as the season progresses, the others have their own distractions, like Patel (RaviPatel) dealing with his daughter’s new boyfriend or Victoria (GracePalmer) trying to pass along a piglet she found.
Across its first two episodes back, Season 5 lets those personal stories stay delightfully messy while giving the whole precinct a shared concern: Argue over who’s in charge later, but first, make sure there’s still a precinct to run. It’s also a sharp way to spotlight McHale’s Frank as the team’s lead as the milestone season nudges him into a more selfless, altruistic mission to put not just the animals first, but the team he will never admit he loves.
Advertisement
‘Animal Control’s Ensemble Is Still One of TV’s Best
McHale knows exactly how much dignity Frank needs to lose before a scene gets funny. In the premiere, he guides the team through, basically, a work strike that feels like a righteous cause, but then lets his character’s excitement over the Seahawks’ missing mascot cut straight through it. As we see with his comedic timing, that balance in humor is best seen in the “Seahawks and Piglets” premiere’s cold open or the laugh-out-loud moment of him in Episode 2 screaming at the top of his lungs while cornered in a crawlspace with a furry creature. It’s also McHale’s signature dry humor that holds those extremes together while opening up another side of Frank audiences love.
Stepping up to what feels like a bigger role this season is Dee, who’s a strong match for McHale as he plays Templeton’s authority with absolute conviction — even when his latest precinct addition is a utility belt Daisy can barely carry. One of the premiere’s highlights is the hilariously bare-chested, grease-covered fight that is downright ridiculous, with squelching sounds that you can’t unhear. Meanwhile, Pratt levels up Daisy from spectator this season with an eager, sharp pace that gives her partnership with Frank and the others its own prickly rhythm.
Lovell is especially funny in the quieter scenes, giving Emily’s scone delivery such an earnest warmth that everyone’s strained politeness becomes the joke — even if there’s more to it than meets the eye. As the others find themselves juggling more than usual this season, Rowland lets Shred’s anxiety build in small steps as he finds an absorbing balance of being the supportive boyfriend still doing his job.
Advertisement
Similarly, Palmer continues to sharpen that easy wit and carefree vibe, landing every joke through dry responses that never interrupt a scene’s rhythm. Patel continues to give his namesake character an endearingly stressed edge that brings a comically commanding intensity to scenes with his daughter Addy’s (DayahBrar) boyfriend. Last but not least is Jeong’s Roman, who he plays with such a cheerful self-belief that his nonchalance feels like an asset to the character and one that adds another dimension of comic relief to every situation, especially as the precinct locks him as their target. With Roman being back, it’s clear everyone has a different way of getting a laugh, and they’re each as good at giving one another room to land it.
‘Animal Control’ Season 5’s Writing Is Funnier
Image via Bettina Strauss/FOX
One of the more interesting aspects of Animal Control this far into its network TV plunge is how there are real stakes that give room for its characters to really develop. Season 5 gives the precinct something more pressing than its usual arguments and shenanigans: The possibility that the team could lose its place to Roman’s private agency. What’s more grounded is how that threat has a foothold in reality, as cities can hand animal control services to outside organizations. This gives the precinct’s fight a little more bite than the usual workplace rivalry.
Advertisement
Not only does that threat change how the characters see their jobs and one another, but it’s clear they can’t afford to ignore what’s happening around them. Even with Emily trying her best to help where she can, the writing this season lets these loyalties show through all the bickering without prompting a big speech about friendships. Instead, the jokes do double duty, showing how much these people depend on one another even if they drive each other up the wall.
But better yet, the comedy has gotten funnier. The jokes come faster this season and still align with that signature slapstick style sprinkled in with a few sight gags. But the show still knows when to leave space for a deadpan reaction or an uncomfortable pause. The nearly 22-minute episodes move easily between an animal call, a workplace dispute, and someone’s personal crisis, with each plot reaching a charming end before the next begins.
Best of all, there’s more energy here than in a sitcom simply enjoying the company of familiar characters, thanks to some bonkers pairing that elevates the humor. Animal Control knows this crew well enough to put them under pressure and find fresh reasons for them to drive each other mad, and that’s a lovely place for a fifth season to be.
Animal Control airs Sundays on Fox at 8:30 p.m. EST and streams the next day on Hulu.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Release Date
February 16, 2023
Advertisement
Network
FOX
Writers
Advertisement
Dan Sterling, Tad Quill
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Pros & Cons
McHale’s dry timing makes Frank both ridiculous and easy to root for.
The comedy is faster and funnier, with room for deadpan beats.
Roman’s agency gives the precinct a shared threat with real stakes.
Emily’s suspension keeps her away from the precinct, limiting the time Lovell gets to play off the full ensemble.
It’s the season of crime on streaming, with the recently released Unabomber movie jumping to the top of the Netflix viewership charts. Meanwhile, the latest seasons of Guy Ritchie‘s The Gentlemen and MobLand are enjoying continued success on their respective platforms, while another face-off unfolds on MGM+. The Westies, a crime drama series headlined by J.K. Simmonsand Titus Welliver, had been enjoying relative freedom for the past several weeks, facing competition only in the form of the sci-fi series From. More recently, however, a new crime series has offered a fresh challenge to The Westies, replacing it as the number-one series domestically on MGM+.
The new show is a limited series based on a popular podcast; both the source material and the TV spin-off are fronted by Jon Hamm. The show appears to be following in the footsteps of Ryan Murphy‘s popular anthology series American Crime Story, American Horror Story, and American Sports Story. Based on a real incident from the 1970s, the new series follows the standoff between a disgruntled man and the authorities after he takes a mortgage broker hostage following a dispute. The hostage taker, played by Giovanni Ribisi, demands to be interviewed by a radio host played by Hamm.
Advertisement
Collider Exclusive · Villain Personality Quiz Which Criminal Mastermind Would Be Your Nemesis? Lecter · Joker · Moriarty · Chigurh
Advertisement
Four of the finest criminal minds ever put on screen. One of them would look at you and see something worth their time. Eight questions decide which one comes for you, why they picked you, and what they would want when they arrived.
🍷Lecter
🃏Joker
♟️Moriarty
🪙Chigurh
Advertisement
01
Advertisement
What would a criminal mastermind notice about you first? Great villains choose their opponents carefully. Something about you got their attention.
02
Advertisement
How do they make first contact? The introduction tells you everything about what is coming next.
03
Advertisement
What do you actually believe about right and wrong? Every nemesis is really an argument about the thing you believe most.
04
Advertisement
What finally gets under your skin? Everybody has a pressure point. Finding yours is the whole plan.
05
Advertisement
They have made their move. How do you fight back? This is the part of the film where the audience finds out who you are.
06
Advertisement
What would they use against you? A good villain never brings a weapon you have not already handed them.
07
Advertisement
What do they actually want from you? The money is never the point. Something else always is.
08
Advertisement
How does it end between the two of you? Eight questions in, this is the one that decides who comes for you.
The Case File Is Complete Your Nemesis Is…
Advertisement
Four criminal masterminds. One of them was always going to be yours.
Here is who comes for you, why they picked you out of everyone available, and what they want from
the encounter.
The Silence of the Lambs · Hannibal · 1991–2002
Advertisement
Hannibal Lecter
Your nemesis does not want to beat you. He wants to know you
completely, and he is patient enough to wait for it. The frightening part is how good the
conversation is.
Lecter is the most dangerous kind of opponent: the one who finds you interesting. He
never raises his voice, because he has never needed to.
You keep a great deal to yourself and you are careful about what you show. That reserve
is exactly the door he would knock on.
The films understood something other thrillers missed. The horror is not the violence.
It is being perfectly understood by the wrong person.
He would be unfailingly polite about all of it. That is the worst part.
Batman · The Dark Knight · 1989–2019
Advertisement
The Joker
Your nemesis is not after money, territory or revenge. He is
after a demonstration, and you are the person he has chosen to prove his point on.
The Joker only picks opponents who believe in something. Your decency is not a defence
against him. It is the entire reason he showed up.
He has no plan you can predict and nothing you can take away, which removes every tool
you would normally reach for.
His whole argument is that you are one bad day away from being him, and you would spend
the rest of your life proving him wrong.
He would call it a magic trick. You would call it the worst night of your life.
Sherlock Holmes · The Final Problem · Since 1893
Advertisement
Moriarty
Your nemesis respects you, which sounds flattering until you work
out what it means. He chose you because nobody else was worth his time.
Moriarty is the original criminal mastermind, the template every later one borrows from:
a mind the equal of the hero’s, pointed the wrong way.
You enjoy being the cleverest person in the room. He is counting on exactly that, and he
has already built the room.
This is the rare nemesis who would be genuinely disappointed if you lost badly. He needs
the game to be worth playing.
It ends the way these things always end. Two people, one problem, and only one way down.
No Country for Old Men · 2007
Advertisement
Anton Chigurh
Your nemesis has no personal interest in you whatsoever, and that
is precisely what makes him unsurvivable. You are not a rival. You are a stop on the way.
Chigurh does not negotiate, gloat or explain. He arrives, he asks one question, and the
answer was decided long before you opened your mouth.
You trust yourself to handle things. He is the one problem in the world that has no
interest in how capable you are.
No Country for Old Men rewrote the screen villain by removing the thing audiences
quietly rely on: the sense that talking might work.
Call it. He will wait.
Advertisement
Titus Welliver and Jon Hamm Worked Together on a Crime Classic
The series in question is American Hostage, and according to FlixPatrol, it’s now the most-watched title on the MGM+ charts. Also featuring Mireille Enos, the series has aired three episodes so far, and has pushed The Westies down the leaderboard. American Hostage now holds a stellar 93% score on the aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, with Collider’s Meredith Loftus describing it in her review as “a crime thriller you don’t want to sleep on.” Meanwhile, The Westies appears to have settled at a 78% score on Rotten Tomatoes, where the consensus reads, “What The Westies lacks in originality, it makes up for with a sturdy crime story, compelling characters, and a cast that knows how to handle the genre.” Incidentally, Hamm and Welliver played pivotal supporting roles in Ben Affleck‘s critically acclaimed heist movie The Town, which was released in 2010. Recently, Hamm has been acclaimed for his central performance in Apple TV’s Your Friends & Neighbors, while Welliver has become a household name thanks to Prime Video’s Bosch, which could be eyeing a return. Stay tuned to Collider for more updates.
Tom Cruise playing Jack Reacher eventually became one of the most controversial casting decisions in modern action movies, but here’s the weird part: he wasn’t originally attached to play him at all. According to Lee Child, Cruise’s involvement with Jack Reacher began behind the scenes, years before he decided he wanted to step in front of the camera.
Speaking exclusively with Collider ahead of his new Reacher novel, Child revealed that Cruise initially became involved through Cruise/Wagner Productions as an investor. He already knew the books and believed a movie adaptation had potential, but playing Reacher wasn’t initially part of the plan. “Cruise was not attached to it as an actor or producer,” Child told Collider. “He was an investor. He knew the series. He thought, ‘Yeah, this will probably fly.’ He wanted to be an investor, and Cruise/Wagner was the production company.”
So what changed? Christopher McQuarrie. After years in development, McQuarrie wrote the screenplay that would eventually become Jack Reacher. Child remembers being hugely impressed by the script, and Cruise apparently had the same reaction. “After six years, a screenplay was written by Christopher McQuarrie, who’s a shit-hot guy,” said Child, in something of an understatement. “| mean, a great, great writer, great movie man. The screenplay was so good, and it was circulated amongst all the interested parties. Obviously, I got a copy. Cruise got a copy as an executive producer, and so on. Cruise read it and thought, ‘Wow, this is great. I want to play this guy.’ And that’s where it started rolling.”
Advertisement
Advertisement
Collider Exclusive · Sci-Fi Survival Quiz Which Sci-Fi World Would You Survive? The Matrix · Mad Max · Blade Runner · Dune · Star Wars
Five universes. Five completely different ways the future went wrong — or sideways, or up in flames. Only one of them is the world your instincts were built for. Eight questions will figure out which dystopia, galaxy, or desert wasteland you’d actually make it out of alive.
💊The Matrix
🔥Mad Max
🌧️Blade Runner
Advertisement
🏜️Dune
🚀Star Wars
Advertisement
01
You sense something is deeply wrong with the world around you. What do you do? The first instinct is often the truest one.
Advertisement
02
In a world of scarcity, what resource do you guard most fiercely? What we protect reveals what we believe survival actually requires.
Advertisement
03
What kind of threat keeps you up at night? Fear is useful data — if you’re honest about what you’re actually afraid of.
Advertisement
04
How do you deal with authority you don’t trust? Every dystopia has a power structure. Your approach to it determines everything.
Advertisement
05
Which environment could you actually endure long-term? Survival isn’t just tactical — it’s physical, psychological, and very much about where you are.
Advertisement
06
Who do you want in your corner when things fall apart? The company you keep is the clearest signal of who you actually are.
Advertisement
07
Where do you draw the line — if you draw one at all? Every survivor eventually faces a moment that tests what they’re actually made of.
Advertisement
08
What would actually make survival worth it? Staying alive is one thing. Having a reason to is another.
Advertisement
Your Fate Has Been Calculated You’d Survive In…
Your answers point to the world your instincts were built for. This is the universe your temperament, your survival instincts, and your particular brand of stubbornness were made for.
Advertisement
The Resistance, Zion
The Matrix
You took the red pill a long time ago — probably before anyone offered it to you. You’re a systems thinker who can’t help but notice the seams in things.
Advertisement
You’re drawn to understanding how the system works before figuring out how to break it.
You’d find the Resistance, or it would find you — your instinct for spotting constructed realities is the machines’ worst nightmare.
You function best when you have access to information and the freedom to act on it.
The Matrix built an airtight prison. You’d be the one probing the walls for the door.
The Wasteland
Mad Max
The wasteland doesn’t reward the clever or the well-connected — it rewards those who are hard to kill and harder to break. That’s you.
Advertisement
You don’t need comfort, community, or a cause larger than the next horizon.
You need a vehicle, a clear threat, and enough fuel to outrun it — and you’re good at all three.
You are unsentimental enough to survive that world, and decent enough — just barely — to be something more than another raider.
In the wasteland, that distinction is everything.
Los Angeles, 2049
Blade Runner
You’d survive here because you know how to exist in moral grey areas without losing yourself completely.
Advertisement
You read people accurately, keep your circle small, and ask the questions others prefer not to answer.
In a city where humanity is a legal designation rather than a feeling, you hold onto something that keeps you functional.
You’re not a hero. But you’re not lost, either.
In Blade Runner’s world, that distinction is everything.
Arrakis
Dune
Arrakis is the most hostile environment in the known universe — and you are precisely the kind of person it rewards.
Advertisement
Patience, discipline, and political awareness are your core strengths — and on Arrakis, they’re survival tools.
You understand that the long game matters more than any single victory.
Others come to Dune and are consumed by it. You’d learn its logic and earn its respect.
In time, you wouldn’t just survive Arrakis — you’d begin to reshape it.
A Galaxy Far, Far Away
Star Wars
The galaxy far, far away is vast, loud, and in a constant state of violent political upheaval — and you wouldn’t have it any other way.
Advertisement
You find meaning in being part of something larger than yourself — a cause, a crew, a rebellion.
You’d gravitate toward the Rebellion, or the fringes, or whatever pocket of the galaxy still believes the Empire’s grip can be broken.
You fight — not because you have to, but because standing aside isn’t something you’re capable of.
In Star Wars, that willingness is what makes all the difference.
Advertisement
Tom Cruise Wasn’t Supposed To Be Jack Reacher
Tom Cruise in ‘Jack Reacher’Image via Paramount Pictures
The backstory behind how the movie got made makes the whole thing a lot more interesting. This wasn’t a series that Cruise had earmarked for himself the whole time; he just found a series he wanted to see become a movie franchise. But the script was just too good to turn down, and when Tom Cruise says he wants to play a part, he usually gets what he’s after. Of course, that created a problem nobody involved could ignore, because Child’s Reacher is described as a physically enormous man, while Cruise very obviously isn’t. The decision nevertheless paid enormous dividends for the books, which helped build the franchise into a worldwide phenomenon. Cruise was one of the world’s biggest movie stars, and Jack Reacher introduced Child’s character to audiences who had never picked up one of the novels. Child recalled that shortly after the first movie arrived, eight of his older paperbacks simultaneously landed in the Top 10.
Jack Reacher is available to rent or buy digitally. Lee Child was speaking exclusively to Collider in support of Chain Reaction, the latest Jack Reacher novel, which arrives October 20. Child will also co-write Zero Margin, the first Frances Neagley novel, with Yasmin Angoe, arriving in spring 2027. Sign up for a free trial of Audible to listen to the Reacher novels and more.
“In my age group, the teenagers, if you ever snuck out to see a girl or do something like that, you’d be reprimanded by being taken to a place called Park Lodge or the Snake Pit,” Stallone, 80, told The New York Timesin a profile published Saturday, September 26, repeating claims mentioned in his new memoir, The Steps, about his experience at Devereux Manor High School. “On the outside it looked like a big, old Tudor home from the ’20s, and then you walked inside and you entered the heart of insanity.”
He continued, “The smell, the filth, people running around naked, clawing, hands tied, drooling. This is what they thought would impress you never to break the rules again.”
According to Stallone, he was once remanded to a psychiatric ward for “a couple of weeks.”
Sylvester Stallone and Robert Patrick’s past working relationship made for an “easier” time on the Tulsa King season 3 set. “Because we know each other, we can speak in shorthand,” Stallone, 79, told Us Weekly exclusively ahead of the Paramount+ show’s premiere on Sunday, September 21. “Robert is one of these actors — which I […]
“It was wild, but this to me, was one of the better things that happened, too,” the action star recalled. “I said, ‘I know they’re going to try to break me.’ I was attacked there. They tried to rip my groin off.”
Advertisement
Stallone claimed that he was sent to the facility alongside a fellow student nicknamed Jay Bird.
“He was big, had no hair, always naked, rotten teeth. They called him Jay Bird because he was always naked as a jaybird,” he told The Times. “And I go into the bathroom on the way to the food mess hall, and he comes in and comes around me and he’s like ripping on my throat and he is going into my pants and grabbing my groin.”
Stallone continued, “Then, the two guards come in and they’re beating the crap out of him with razor straps. I go, ‘What the hell is wrong with him?’ And they say, ‘You’re in a crazy house, boy. Nothing’s wrong with him. He’s crazy.’”
Sylvester Stallone is addressing President Donald Trump’s surprise decision to appoint him as a special ambassador to Hollywood. “Well, it just happened. I was watching TV one night, and they go, ‘So Stallone and Mel Gibson and Jon Voight will be …’ And I went, ‘What?’” Stallone, 80, recalled to The Sunday Times in an interview […]
Following the alleged attack, Stallone said he took “a much better lesson” from the incident.
Thank You!
You have successfully subscribed.
Advertisement
“When I came out of there and was standing before the school principal and he said, ‘You learned your lesson?’ I said, ‘I learned a lot more than that lesson. A much better lesson: You can’t break me,’” he stated. “So when I got to [New York City in my 20s] and everything that came after that, I always felt I was unbreakable in that way. My heart could be broken, like every human being, but I’m talking about will.”
Stallone attended Devereux Manor High School, an educational institution in Pennsylvania run by Devereux Advanced Behavioral Health foundation. A rep for Devereux told The Times that they respect Stallone’s “right to tell his story his own way” and are “sorry for any trauma he remembers experiencing” without directly commenting on the accusations.
The Steps hits bookstore shelves Tuesday, September 29.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login