At sundown on Monday, Purim begins; a holiday rooted in survival, marking the Jewish people’s narrow escape from annihilation in ancient Persia. The story, told in the Book of Esther, is not subtle. A Persian court insider, named Haman convinces the king that the Jews must be wiped out. A young queen named Esther risks everything, steps forward, and turns the tide. Hamantaschen for everyone and don’t even think about handing me one that isn’t filled with poppy seed.
Two and a half millennia later, history has a way of sounding uncomfortably familiar.
With hostilities resuming between Israel, the United States, and the Islamic regime in Tehran, the rhetoric stopped being theoretical and the missiles started flying. As Iran’s retaliation unfolded on Sunday, a ballistic missile struck Beit Shemesh, just west of Jerusalem, and in that instant, the war was no longer a headline scrolling past. It was immediate. It was personal. I put the pen down. I stopped writing. I called family. Nine neighbours were murdered in that strike. Politics disappears when your phone starts ringing and you’re counting names.
Believe what you believe about governments and geopolitics. But no people should live under the shadow of missiles or under a regime that exports death. May the Iranian people one day live in freedom and without fear. They deserve better than this nightmare.
And yet here we are, covering Paramount swallowing Warner Bros, Qobuz drawing a line in the sand over AI, Empire Ears going dark, AMC and indie theaters fighting for oxygen. The media and hi-fi worlds keep spinning. Deals get signed. Products launch. CEOs posture. But this week is a reminder that none of it exists in a vacuum. Not the mergers. Not the music. Not the movies. Not us.
Advertisement
Paramount Wins Warner Bros While Netflix Walks
For the past few months, the future of Warner Bros. Discovery was negotiated behind closed doors; over private dinners in Los Angeles, New York, and Washington, with lawyers murmuring, investors hovering, and regulators quietly keeping score. That maneuvering is over. Paramount has secured the company, with the board approving the deal late on February 26, 2026. David Ellison stayed in the fight. Netflix’s CEO chose not to counter within the allotted window rather than ignite a bidding war.
All of it unfolded under the watchful gaze of the Trump administration, where antitrust scrutiny and political leverage made clear that no media empire moves without federal gravity. Paramount won. Netflix stepped aside. Now the real battle for your wallet begins.
Control of Warner Bros. Discovery means control of one of the deepest libraries in modern entertainment — films, franchises, cable networks, news divisions, and streaming platforms that have defined multiple generations. The dollars matter. The regulators matter. The politics matter. But beneath all of that is a larger shift: power in Hollywood is consolidating fast, and the streaming hierarchy is being rewritten in real time.
Now comes the part nobody puts in the press release. HBO Max, TNT, CNN, Warner Bros. Television, DC, and a sprawl of international assets have to be folded into a single operating strategy. Tens of thousands of jobs sit under that umbrella. Overlap will be cut. Billions in costs will be slashed. Paramount has made it clear this must turn profitable quickly and before its own board starts asking hard questions. With more than $110 billion in enterprise value and obligations tied up in this ecosystem, there is no room for sentimental restructuring.
Advertisement
Hollywood is not easing into a new era. It’s being forced into one.
Consolidation at this scale doesn’t lead to kumbaya town halls and better consumer bundles. It leads to layoffs. Platform convergence. Redundancies circled in red ink. Expect overlap to be cut aggressively and quickly. If HBO Max survives as a standalone brand under Paramount’s roof, it will be a minor miracle. The far more likely outcome is a folding into Paramount+, some Frankenstein hybrid pitched as “value.” As for the rest of the television portfolio under the umbrella; TNT, TBS, legacy cable properties, their long-term fate is anything but secure.
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
And then there’s CNN. That’s the real live wire. Owning CBS News and CNN hands one studio extraordinary influence over the tone, framing, and velocity of national news coverage. That level of concentration will not go unnoticed. CNN’s ratings are soft even on a good week. Its on-air talent is expensive. Very expensive. Does Paramount maintain two separate news divisions? Do they merge them into something unified with a very prominent “C” at the beginning? No one at CNN is sleeping particularly well right now.
Advertisement
It’s difficult to imagine that decision unfolding quietly or without casualties; Bari Weiss has every reason to be smiling right now, knowing that after selling The Free Press to Paramount and stepping into control at CBS News, she now holds the professional fate of many who once lined up to attack her.
The ripple effects extend to theaters. Both Netflix and Paramount made promises during the bidding process about theatrical commitments, windowing strategies, and respect for exhibition. We’ll see. The length of theatrical runs before titles shift to streaming is now a corporate lever, not a creative one. If windows shrink below three weeks, exhibitors, especially chains like AMC are going to feel it fast. Theaters are already operating on thin margins. Compress the window and you accelerate the decline.
Then there’s physical media — the part enthusiasts still care about. As buyers of discs, many of us felt marginally safer with Paramount controlling Warner’s catalog. But let’s not kid ourselves. What was once a multi-billion-dollar category is now a thin, diminished version of itself. Outside of specialty labels like The Criterion Collection, Arrow Video, and Kino Lorber, mainstream studio releases in 2026 are lucky to hit low six figures in unit sales. Low. Six. Figures. For companies the size of Paramount and Warner, that’s a rounding error tolerated, not prioritized.
Talent is the final pressure point. Do we really believe someone like James Gunn who has been openly critical of President Trump — remains comfortably in place at DC when Ellison did not win this fight without political gravity on his side? Maybe. But Hollywood loyalty lasts exactly as long as leverage does. Don’t be shocked if Gunn finds his way back to Marvel or under the Disney umbrella where the corporate alignment is cleaner.
Advertisement
This is what monumental change actually looks like. Jobs will disappear. Platforms will merge. Newsrooms will consolidate. Theatrical windows will compress. Physical media will shrink further into boutique territory. And consumers? They won’t be the primary beneficiaries. Power has concentrated. Now we find out what that concentration costs and don’t expect the bill to be lower than what you’re paying now.
Qobuz Cracks Down on AI Content to Protect Artists
AI music is no longer some nerdy weird science experiment in a lab. It is a content factory running three shifts before its workers head out to Waffle House for eggs, grits, and fisticuffs.
Streaming platforms are getting buried under machine generated tracks. Endless ambient playlists by artists who have never seen a sunrise. Jazz trios that have never boozed it up and fought backstage over a set list. Singer songwriters with flawless pitch and the emotional range of a toaster. Upload by the truckload. Tweak the metadata. Scoop up fractions of a penny at industrial scale.
Advertisement
If that sounds familiar, it should. It is basically the subplot of Office Space. Skim a microscopic amount from each transaction and hope nobody notices until the money adds up. Except this time it is not Initech. And there are no conjugal visits. It is the global music ecosystem. And the people getting screwed over are real musicians trying to pay the rent and afford health insurance. Spotify has been playing whack a mole with this stuff for a while now and they’re not winning. When the system rewards sheer output, you get a flood. Not art. A flood. Quality gets shoved to the curb and the consumer gets stuck listening to garbage they really didn’t want to pay for.
That is the mess Qobuz is stepping into.
Earlier this month Qobuz rolled out its AI Charter, which was easy to applaud and just as easy to ignore. Instead of leaving it as a mission statement, they built a proprietary detection system to scan the catalog and flag music that is one hundred percent AI generated. Not “possibly.” Not “we think so.” Tagged. Labeled. Out in the open. Those identifiers will begin showing up across the apps in the coming months so you actually know what you are listening to.
Qobuz is also tightening the screws on fraud. Impersonation attempts. Streaming patterns that look like they were engineered in a basement server farm in Tehran. The company is expanding its detection tools so if something smells off, it does not get the benefit of the doubt. It gets flagged, refused, or removed. And those fake streams do not count toward royalty reports. Good luck getting Spotify to offer up something like that.
Advertisement
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
On the editorial side, Qobuz is keeping actual humans in the driver’s seat. Real editors picking Albums of the Week. Real teams building playlists and Qobuzissimes. No content mill dumping twenty thousand tracks into the hopper and hoping the algorithm gets bored enough to promote one. The Discover page will lean on curated data from in-house teams and trusted music labels.
And here is the line that will make certain tech executives roll their eyes. Qobuz says it will not generate audio for its catalog. It will not replace human curation with AI systems and not use customer data to train external AI models. That almost feels like open rebellion against the Emperor.
Why should you care?
Advertisement
Because the money is not theoretical. A 2024 CISAC study projected that by 2028 music creators could lose around ten billion euros over five years due to AI competition and unlicensed use of their work. At the same time, generative AI companies could be pulling in billions annually from that same ecosystem. None of that sounds like a win for the artists who create real music and don’t be surprised when that becomes an even uglier fight for screenwriters, actors, and cinematographers.
The WGA and SAG have already gone on strike to fight against these practices and if you think studios undergoing acquisition and consolidation will continue to spend hundreds of millions on individual films when they can produce 10 for the same price using AI — you’re about to find out that profits matter more than quality.
For artists, this is survival. If machine output floods playlists and crowds out real musicians, visibility collapses and compensation shrinks even further. For listeners, it is about knowing whether the song you love was written by someone with rent due or generated by a prompt and a power bill.
Qobuz Deputy CEO, Georges Fornay explained that “the hyperinflation of AI content is creating distrust across the industry.” He is not wrong. When everything looks and sounds polished, authenticity becomes the differentiator.
Advertisement
Qobuz is betting some of you still care who made the music. In a business chasing endless content like it is oxygen, backing humans is slower and messier. You didn’t sign up for synthetic background noise pretending to be art so it will be interesting to see if the rest of the market follows or bends the knee.
Empire Ears Shuts Down After 10 Years in the High End IEM Market
Empire Ears, a name that meant something in the boutique, high-end IEM world — is gone. After a decade of carving out a reputation for sonic excellence and obsessive craftsmanship, the brand quietly shut its doors on February 27, citing health challenges, rising costs, and an increasingly inhospitable market. For enthusiasts who watched Empire’s cables and custom monitors become fixtures on enthusiast wish lists, this is not a footnote. It’s a sign.
And let’s be honest: not all is well in the high-end wired IEM market.
Brands like FiiO, Campfire Audio, and other smaller Asian boutiques are still shipping products and carving out niches, but Empire’s departure forces a hard question: have we hit saturation with ultra-premium wired IEMs in a world that has moved on to wireless? Four-figure cables and hand-crafted shells feel increasingly like boutique curiosities next to the convenience and everyday usability of wireless. The market that once justified artisanal attention has shrunk, shifted, and in some corners evaporated.
That tension will be on full display this weekend at CanJam NYC 2026, and yes, we will be there covering it. If wired IEMs still have gas in the tank, this is where the next spark of innovation should show up: new driver tech, refreshed tuning philosophies, perhaps unexpected form factors that justify carrying wires in the age of Bluetooth dominance. We already know that one of our favorite European headphone and IEM manufacturers plans to unveil a new $1,000 wired IEM this weekend, and it will be very interesting to see how the market reacts.
Advertisement
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
But the departure of Empire cannot be ignored. It underscores a larger industry truth that many in audio enthusiast circles are quietly wrestling with: excellence does not guarantee survival. Passion does not pay rent. And even the most covetable products can find themselves adrift when consumer priorities shift faster than product cycles.
Smells Like Victory
Robert Duvall died on February 15 at 95, and with him goes the kind of actor Hollywood does not turn out anymore.
Duvall did not arrive in Hollywood fully formed. He earned it the old way. He started on stage in 1952, grinding through summer stock at the Gateway Playhouse in Bellport on Long Island, taking a year off to serve in the United States Army before returning to the boards. Those early contacts opened the door to television in the 1960s, with appearances on serious dramas like The Defenders, Playhouse 90, and Armstrong Circle Theatre, where actors were expected to act, not pose.
He made his Broadway debut in Wait Until Dark in 1966. More than a decade later, already a film star, he went back to the stage for David Mamet’s American Buffalo in 1977 and earned a Drama Desk nomination. That tells you something. He did not see theater as a stepping stone. It was part of the craft.
Advertisement
His film debut came quietly but memorably as Boo Radley in To Kill a Mockingbird in 1962. No grand speech. Barely any lines. Just presence. Then the run started. Bullitt. True Grit. M*A*S*H. THX 1138. He slipped into supporting roles and made them stick. You might not have walked into the theater for Robert Duvall in those early years, but you walked out remembering him.
Everything changed with The Godfather. Tom Hagen. Quiet consigliere. The man in the room who did not need to raise his voice because he already understood the temperature. It was a supporting role that felt like a lead. Duvall did that a lot. He made space feel heavier. He made silence do the talking.
Apocalypse Now is the obvious landmark. Lieutenant Colonel Kilgore, sunburned and unhinged, delivering lines about napalm with a grin that told you everything about war and madness in a single breath. But go deeper and you see the range that defined him. The Apostle, which he wrote and directed, was raw and fearless. Tender Mercies earned him an Academy Award and showed how much power he could summon by barely moving at all. Lonesome Dove on television turned him into Augustus McCrae, all warmth and steel, reminding Hollywood that the small screen could still carry epic performances if you put the right actor in the saddle.
He was also a better dancer than anyone remembers. Watch him in Tender Mercies or The Apostle. Loose hips. Total commitment. No vanity. He moved like a man who did not care who was watching. He understood rhythm. Not just musical rhythm. Emotional rhythm. Scene rhythm. He could charm you in one beat and terrify you in the next.
Advertisement
Duvall belonged to the old guard. The Clint Eastwood school. The Al Pacino and Gene Hackman generation. Actors who showed up prepared, knew their lines, respected the craft, and did not spend their days refreshing social feeds to see how the discourse was trending. He was not shy about his political views. He did not tailor them for applause. He also did not make them the centerpiece of his career. The work came first.
That is the difference. Today too many performers treat acting like branding. The right cause. The right quote. The right viral moment. Duvall did not need any of that. He was about the scene. About the truth inside it. He could be gentle and disarming. He could be solemn and wounded. And when the role demanded it, he could be cold, manipulative, and downright evil without blinking.
Even late in his career he could walk into a scene and own it. In Thank You for Smoking, he played tobacco tycoon Captain, half mischievous uncle, half corporate warlord, dancing around the moral hypocrisy of Washington with a grin and a glass in hand.
Advertisement
Every film or television project he joined improved simply because he was in it. He raised the standard in the room. Directors trusted him. Co-stars leaned on him. Audiences believed him.
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
He was not flashy. He was not desperate to be liked. He was a professional in the purest sense of the word. And in an industry that increasingly rewards noise over depth, Robert Duvall felt like something rarer each year. A craftsman. A grown up. A cut above what too often passes for acting today.
We may receive a commission on purchases made from links.
As the largest online retailer, it’s no surprise that Amazon’s listings are filled with great deals on useful items. However, there are some things to avoid buying from Amazon, so it’s a good idea to do some research before making a purchase. While Amazon Basics socket sets are cheap, whether they’re any good is a different question.
Advertisement
Shopping at Amazon is fast, convenient, and typically budget-friendly, but buying tools from relatively unknown brands, like Amazon Basics, online can be a gamble. Amazon lists itself as the manufacturer of Amazon Basics socket sets. Amazon Basics, formerly the Denali brand, is Amazon’s store-branded tool line made for Amazon by suppliers in Asia. This is a similar approach to other retailer-owned brands like many of those sold by Harbor Freight, Lowe’s Kobalt, or Home Depot’s Husky brands. So while the brand name is recognizable to customers, it doesn’t necessarily tell us a lot about the quality of the tools.
Advertisement
What you should know about the quality of Amazon Basics socket sets
Trying to determine the quality of the Amazon Basics tools we’re looking at online starts with viewing the glossy images and reading any specifications provided on the product page. While the tools are often backed by the self-promoting “Amazon’s Choice” label, it’s often better to look for user reviews and independent product tests before clicking the “Buy Now” button.
As with most things in life, there are some Amazon Basics tools worth buying and others we should avoid. Amazon Basics socket sets are generally highly rated on Amazon, with reviews for various mechanic’s tool sets containing sockets apparently lumped together as each have 12.6K reviews and 4.7-star ratings.
Project Farm tested an Amazon Basics tool kit (alongside other kits) that included a ⅜-inch-drive socket set among other tools designed for household use. The video host notes that the tool kit is “Made in China” before putting the sockets and ratchet to the test. Using an impact wrench to test the failure point of sockets up to 200 ft-lbs, the Amazon Basics socket was failure-free up to 203.7 foot-pounds. The included ratchet handle only withstood 100 ft-lbs before starting to bend and the internal ratcheting mechanism failed at 160 ft-lbs. While the Amazon Basics ratchet failed under less load than Kobalt or Pittsburgh ratchets, it surpassed the Craftsman ratchet.
Advertisement
What types of Amazon Basics socket sets does Amazon sell?
Most of Amazon’s Amazon Basics socket sets are offered as part of a mechanic tool set that often include wrenches, hex-keys, and other tools. One such item, marked as “Amazon’s Choice: Overall Pick,” is the 201-piece mechanics socket tool set with case, priced at $53.98 with free two-day Prime shipping available.
While you shouldn’t rely exclusively on the Amazon “Overall Pick” label when shopping online, especially for socket sets, it’s not a bad sign for tools. Amazon’s criteria for a product earning the label indicates it must hold at least a 4-star rating, be purchased often, and have a low rate of returns. Just don’t be fooled into thinking an Amazon employee is rating these products based on how they perform.
Advertisement
Another “Amazon Choice” option is the Amazon Basics 19-piece ½-inch-drive 6-point shallow impact socket set for $55.99. The set only includes SAE-sized impact-rated sockets, no metric sizes, ratchets, or extensions. Socket sizes range from ⅜-inch up to 1-½-inches in 1/16-inch intervals without skips. They feature chrome molybdenum alloy steel (Cr-Mo) construction and come in a fitted carrying case measuring 10.2 by 8.5 by 2.4 inches.
Amazon Basics socket set options also include specialty sockets, like the 14-piece external Torx socket set ranging from E4 to E24 sizes in ¼-, ⅜-, and ½-inch drives. While the set comes in a storage case for $11.60 and earns a 4.6-star rating on Amazon, it’s not labeled as an “Amazon Choice” since it is frequently returned.
A phishing campaign is using a fake Google Account security page to deliver a web-based app capable of stealing one-time passcodes, harvesting cryptocurrency wallet addresses, and proxying attacker traffic through victims’ browsers.
The attack leverages Progressive Web App (PWA) features and social engineering to deceive users into believing they are interacting with a legitimate Google Security web page and inadvertently installing the malware.
PWAs run in the browser and can be installed from a website, just like a standalone regular application, which is displayed in its own window without any visible browser controls.
Victim browser becomes attacker’s proxy
The campaign relies on social engineering to obtain the necessary permissions from the user under the guise of a security check and increased protection for devices.
Advertisement
The cybercriminals use the domain google-prism[.]com, which poses as a legitimate security-related service from Google, showing a four-step setup process that includes giving risky permissions and installing a malicious PWA app. In some instances, the site will also promote a companion Android app to “protect” contacts.
According to researchers at cybersecurity company Malwarebytes, the PWA app can exfiltrate contacts, real-time GPS data, and clipboard contents.
Additional functionality observed includes acting as a network proxy and internal port scanner, which allows the attacker to route requests through the victim’s browser and identify live hosts on the network.
The website also requests permissions to access text and images copied to the clipboard, which can occur only when the app is open.
Advertisement
Fake Google security site asking for clipboard access source: BleepingComputer
However, the fake website also asks for permission to show notifications, which allows the attacker to push alerts, new tasks, or trigger data exfiltration.
Additionally, the malware uses the WebOTP API on supported browsers in an attempt to intercept SMS verification codes, and checks the /api/heartbeat every 30 seconds for new commands.
As the PWA app can only steal the contents of the clipboard and OTP codes when it is open, notifications can be used to send fake security alerts that prompt the user to open the PWA again.
Fake Google security site asks for notifications permissions source: BleepingComputer
Malwarebytes says that the focus is on stealing one-time passwords (OTP) and cryptocurrency wallet addresses, and that the malware also “builds a detailed device fingerprint.”
Another component in the malicious PWA is a service worker that is responsible for push notifications, running tasks from received payloads, and preparing stolen data locally for exfiltration.
The researchers say that the most concerning component is the WebSocket relay that allows the attacker to pass web requests through the browser as if they were on the victim’s network.
Advertisement
“The malware acts as an HTTP proxy, executing fetch requests with whatever method, headers, credentials, and body the attacker specifies, then returns the full response including headers” – Malwarebytes
Because the worker includes a handler for Periodic Background Sync, which allows web apps in Chromium-based browsers to periodically synchronize data in the background, the attacker can connect to a compromised device for as long as the malicious PWA app is installed.
Malware Android companion
Users who choose to activate all the security features for their account also receive an APK file for their Android devices that promises to extend protection to the list of contacts.
Fake security checks source: BleepingComputer
The payload is described as a “critical security update, ”claims to be verified by Google, and requires 33 permissions that include access to SMS texts, call logs, the microphone, contacts, and the accessibility service.
These alone are high-risk permissions that enable data theft, full device compromise, and financial fraud.
Advertisement
The malicious APK file includes multiple components, such as a custom keyboard to capture keystrokes, a notification listener for access to incoming notifications, and a service to intercept credentials filled automatically.
“To enhance persistence, the APK registers as a device administrator (which can complicate uninstallation), sets a boot receiver to execute on startup, and schedules alarms intended to restart components if terminated,” the researchers say.
Malwarebytes observed components that could be used for overlay-based attacks, which indicate plans for potential credential phishing in certain apps.
By combining legitimate browser features with social engineering, the attacker does not need to exploit any vulnerability. Instead, they trick the victim into providing all the needed permissions for malicious activity to occur.
Advertisement
The researchers warn that even if the Android APK is not installed, the web app can collect contacts, intercept one-time passwords, track location, scan internal networks, and proxy traffic through the victim’s device.
Users should be aware that Google does not run security checks through pop-ups on web pages or request any software installation for enhanced protection features. All security tools are available through the Google Account at myaccount.google.com.
To remove the malicious APK file, Malwarebytes recommends users look for a “Security Check” entry in the list of installed apps and prioritize uninstalling it.
If an app called “System Service” with a package name com.device.sync is present and has device administrator access, users should revoke it under Settings > Security > Device admin apps and then uninstall it.
Advertisement
Malwarebytes researchers also provide detailed steps for removing the malicious web app from both Chromium-based Windows, such as Google Chrome and Microsoft Edge, as well as from Safari.
They note that on Firefox and Safari browsers, many of the malicious app’s capabilities are severely restricted, but push notifications still work.
Malware is getting smarter. The Red Report 2026 reveals how new threats use math to detect sandboxes and hide in plain sight.
Download our analysis of 1.1 million malicious samples to uncover the top 10 techniques and see if your security stack is blinded.
Looking for the most recent regular Connections answers? Click here for today’s Connections hints, as well as our daily answers and hints for The New York Times Mini Crossword, Wordle and Strands puzzles.
Today’s Connections: Sports Edition is a tough one. If you’re struggling with today’s puzzle but still want to solve it, read on for hints and the answers.
Connections: Sports Edition is published by The Athletic, the subscription-based sports journalism site owned by The Times. It doesn’t appear in the NYT Games app, but it does in The Athletic’s own app. Or you can play it for free online.
Hints for today’s Connections: Sports Edition groups
Here are four hints for the groupings in today’s Connections: Sports Edition puzzle, ranked from the easiest yellow group to the tough (and sometimes bizarre) purple group.
Yellow group hint: Deal me in.
Advertisement
Green group hint: Football fun.
Blue group hint: GOAAAAAL!
Purple group hint: Name game.
Answers for today’s Connections: Sports Edition groups
Yellow group: Card games.
Advertisement
Green group: NFL teams, on scoreboards.
Blue group: Premier League nicknames, minus the S.
Looking for the most recent Mini Crossword answer? Click here for today’s Mini Crossword hints, as well as our daily answers and hints for The New York Times Wordle, Strands, Connections and Connections: Sports Edition puzzles.
Today’s NYT Mini Crossword was pretty tough! I was stumped on 1-Across and 1-Down, and it took me a while to figure them out. Read on for all the answers. And if you could use some hints and guidance for daily solving, check out our Mini Crossword tips.
If you’re looking for today’s Wordle, Connections, Connections: Sports Edition and Strands answers, you can visit CNET’s NYT puzzle hints page.
The dawn of the jet age changed the landscape of commercial flight forever, giving rise to affordable, faster travel hallmarked by chic flight attendants and non-stop flights that could take you across the ocean in hours. In the decades since, planes have gotten faster, hitting supersonic speeds, and larger. Aviation safety has also drastically improved: with millions of flights annually, fatal accidents are now exceptionally rare.
Statistically speaking, that old adage that flying is safer than driving is definitely true, though several incidents a year typically make the headlines. In February 2026, a JetBlue flight departing out of Newark Liberty International Airport was forced to return after engine failure. Just a few days later, a Delta Air Lines flight sparked a grass fire near a Savannah/Hilton Head International Airport runway after an engine blew out during takeoff. No one was injured in either incident.
At the time of writing, there’s no indication that these incidents were related to the age of the engines, but just what is the average lifespan of a jet engine? According to Aerospace Global News, the majority of engines used on modern commercial planes have a life of about 25 to 35 years, or about 150,000 flight hours with proper maintenance. To put it another way, the engines on your commercial flight will last much longer than your car probably will! Military aircraft, of course, perform much differently than commercial aircraft, and this vastly affects the lifespan of their engines. These jet engines tend to see about 5,000 to 10,000 mission hours before being retired.
Advertisement
What influences the lifespan of a jet engine?
Frankpeters/Getty Images
We talk about ourselves, our kids, and even our cars in terms of chronological age — your car may be five years old, for example. But when it comes to jet engines, their lifespan is affected more by flight hours and flight cycles than physical age. Most of us keep our vehicles in top shape by performing regular, preventive maintenance, and jet engines are no different, though the process is typically much more extensive! In addition to their own version of an oil change, most jet engines typically require several maintenance visits during their lifespan, where the engine is removed from the aircraft. It may be dismantled, inspected, and serviced to ensure that it continues to operate safely and efficiently.
We are not jet engine mechanics, but we do know that maintaining a jet engine is a complicated process with many metrics. Different parts of the engine have different life cycles and are replaced at different intervals, and there are many factors that can affect the lifespan of a jet engine. These include its maintenance history and its typical operating conditions.
Advertisement
Commercial jets that fly short-haul routes often require more frequent maintenance than long-haul jets, because they experience more takeoff and landing cycles than aircraft that are flying longer routes. Engines on jets that fly short-haul flights typically follow a maintenance schedule based on Engine Flight Cycles, or EFC, and planes that fly longer flights are maintained based on total Engine Flight Hours, or EFH. Ultimately, passengers should feel assured that airlines adhere to strict maintenance guidelines and schedules to keep everyone safe in the air.
A well-specc’d if not quite as strong a performer, the OneOdio Focus A6 deliver good comfort and long battery life but aren’t better than their rivals when it comes to noise-cancellation and there are better-sounding efforts available
Affordable
Lightweight, comfortable design
Long battery life
App support
No carry case/pouch
Average ANC for the money
Average call quality
Better-sounding alternatives available
Key Features
Bluetooth 6.0
New wireless standard for better battery, Find My feature, and connectivity
Battery Life
Advertisement
75 hours max without ANC
LDAC
LDAC Bluetooth for higher quality streaming
Introduction
You’re not spoilt for choice as for as wireless headphones go, and in the last few years, you can bag yourself a pair of budget headphones with comparable specs to over-ears that costs twice as much.
Advertisement
That’s what the OneOdio Focus A6 is aiming for, with wireless Hi-Res Audio support, long battery life, “powerful” noise-cancelling and more for well under £100 / $100, on paper at least, it looks like a bargain.
But, as always, buyer beware, as specs can tell one story but performance will tell another. What story does the OneOdio Focus A6 tell? It’s somewhere in the middle.
Advertisement
Design
Stylish looks
No carry pouch
Foldable design
Flashy is the first word that comes to mind with the Focus A6 headphones. They look stylish with the metal CD textured radial design with gold trim that stands out on both black and white options (the version here is the latter).
They are comfortable to wear over long periods, the lightweight design and lack of any forcible clamping force mean they don’t feel intrusive to wear. The adjustable headband makes it easier to make the headphones fit your head (big or small).
Advertisement
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
The design can be folded both outwards and inwards if you want the headphones to take up less space in a bag. Disappointingly, there’s no case or even a pouch to keep them safe from marks or nicks. It’s a common absence on many budget headphones, and I’m always disappointed when I see it.
Advertisement
The buttons are clicky, if a bit cheap-feeling, but there’s a sense of just getting the job done. Wearing the headphones, they also feel a little rattly from time-to-time – walking down a flight of stairs in Canary Wharf I heard something shaking about in the right earcup. Despite the premium aesthetic, the build quality is what you’d expect for the money.
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
Features
OneOdio companion app
Bluetooth 6.0
LDAC support
The OneOdio, similar to Soundcore and a few others, have a list of features as long as my arm (the span of which is very long), and while they’re impressive on paper, it’s always worth taking them with a pinch of salt.
These are one of the first headphones I’ve used that have Bluetooth 6.0 support, which helps in terms of better battery life, better sound (apparently), less interference, more accurate Find My location help, and more seamless switching between multiple devices (which the Focus A6 supports). You do need a Bluetooth 6 compatible device to make the most out of these features, however.
With the OneOdio Focus A6, I haven’t come a cropper in terms of any wireless interference so it seems as if the headphones hit the mark.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
Elsewhere, there’s SBC, AAC, and LDAC support; the latter boosting the headphones credentials in terms of high quality sound. Though it’s worth adding that it’s not always about the Bluetooth codec in terms of the sound you hear, the quality and tuning of the driver itself will have even greater impact on audio. But at least with LDAC, the OneOdio gives itself a better chance of producing a better sound, though with LDAC enabled it doesn’t appear as if you can utilise Bluetooth multipoint.
It is Hi-Res certified in terms of wired audio, which it supports through its USB input so you can listen to lossless audio (a wired connection also supports ANC as well).
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
There’s the OneOdio app, which offers decent customisation for a headphone at this price, offers some modes including a Game mode (a claimed 0.065 seconds of latency) and the Movie Sound Effect. To be honest, with this mode I can’t hear much of a difference other than it sounding slightly warmer.
There’s also a Find My headphones feature, which with Bluetooth 6.0, is said to be more accurate in figuring out where your headphones are.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Noise-cancelling
Cancels up to 48dB
Wind Noise Reduction mode
Transparency mode
You’d be right not to expect a level of noise-cancellation that, say, the Sony WH-1000XM6 can muster. Despite OneOdio’s claims of cancelling up to 48dB of noise; the performance is in line with similarly priced efforts from Sony, Panasonic, EarFun and Soundcore, which is to say that it’s just ok.
Having used them on a long-haul flight, they reduce the cabin noise a little but not by a huge amount. The sound of the cabin and the engines was still noticeable and I had to raise the volume a lot to hear what I was listening to.
Back on solid ground and again the Focus A6 let quite a bit of noise. They’re decent at suppressing low frequencies but mid and high frequencies still tend to evade the headphones’ microphones. You hear what’s around you with ANC on, and when the Transparency mode is activated, there is a slight artificial sound added on top of what you can hear.
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
The noise-cancelling performance is similar to what you’d get from many budget over-ears at the moment, but I will say that the Lindy BNXe offers a slightly stronger performance if ANC is the prime reason you’re looking to purchase a new pair of headphones.
Advertisement
You do also get Wind Noise Reduction in the app, but again it’s worth bearing in mind the performance isn’t the strongest.
Advertisement
Call quality is not the best either, letting in plenty of noise and making it a fight between your voice and what’s around you when it comes to being heard. In a quiet place you’re likely be fine – take these headphones outside to make calls and it is a struggle despite the Dual-Mic Environment Noise Cancellation these headphones boast.
Battery Life
Up to 40 ANC with ANC
Fast-charging support
The headline feature is 75 hours, but there’s a catch, as always, as that high number is with ANC off. Turn it on and you get close to 40 hours.
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
And in the battery drain test I carried out, I’d say that’s an accurate claim. It took five hours for the headphones to drop 10% battery, which would peg these headphones closer to 50 hours (and this was in LDAC mode). That’s the same performance as the less expensive Mixx StreamQ C4 and better than the likes of the Soundcore Space One.
Advertisement
Fast-charging is provided, and 10 minutes nets you a quite stunning ten extra hours of playback.
Sound Quality
Sharp treble response
Lacks detail
Underwhelming bass performance
I mentioned earlier that having wireless and wired lossless support isn’t as important as the quality and tuning of the drivers, and the sound quality here is not what I’d call excellent. But it’s not bad either.
The OneOdio Focus A6 have a bright and sharp tuning that’s brighter than I’d expected. This tuning initially gives the impression that detail, at least with the highs, is better than you’d expect. But the Focus A6’s overall sense of detail is what I’d term as hazy, and bass comes across as a little limp.
Advertisement
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
With GoGo Penguin’s Atomised it’s a sharp, lean and crisp sound that defers to the highs in terms of brightness, but the midrange isn’t home to the clearest sense of detail or clarity – it’s a treble forward response that I wonder might grate with some who are sensitive to treble. I do like how the highs sound but it’s the rest of the frequency range where the headphones come across as lacklustre.
Advertisement
The headphones in general offer lower levels of detail and definition that remind me of the Mixx StreamQ C4 headphones. The soundstage is spacious but what exists within it is not the most defined. The tone of instruments is a bit hard to tell, the headphones don’t dig out detail as well as I’d hoped, and while voices sound clear they don’t sound particularly natural.
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
Bass is lacking depth and extension with every track I put through these headphones 40mm drivers, and switching on the Super Bass Mode produces a performance that’s less than super. This mode seems to make vocals sound recessed (further away). Pop mode is the default mode and it’s the best of a weak bunch.
The sound has also been tuned with ANC in mind, so when it’s turned off the OneOdio Focus A6 sound softer and the soundstage is smaller. That’s not at all what I expected.
Should you buy it?
The ANC is, for the price, just decent. While they cost less than efforts from the likes of Sony and Soundcore, they’re not better for ANC. You’re saving on money, but not getting a better performance than average here
Advertisement
There are better alternatives out there
Advertisement
There’s nothing here that you could say the OneOdio does better than other pairs, and on that basis, while they’re a decent value proposition in terms of price, there are better options available
Advertisement
Advertisement
Final Thoughts
On paper, these headphones have the elements of what would make a good sound, but OneOdio doesn’t bring all the elements together successfully.
The noise-cancellation is average, as is the call quality. The battery life is long, and the levels of comfort are also good. So what story does the OneOdio Focus A6 tell? I think it’s one where if you approach these headphones with the right expectations, they’ll offer a decent performance for their relatively inexpensive price but if you’re expecting these headphones to outperform their price, that’s not the case.
You could do better, certainly for sound, with the Sony WH-CH720N, Panasonic RB-M600B, Lindy BNXe as alternative options. These headphones won’t make it on the list of best cheap headphones but as a pair of inexpensive wireless over-ears, they just about past muster.
How We Test
The OneOdio Focus A6 were tested over the course of a month, the ANC tested in real-world circumstances and compared against similarly priced rivals through a pink noise test.
A battery drain was carried out over five hours, while the wireless connected was tested out in busy outdoor environments. ANC was used indoors, on planes and walking around cities.
Tested for a month
Tested with real world use
Battery drain carried out
FAQs
Which Bluetooth codecs does the OneOdio Focus A6 support?
You get SBC, AAC, and LDAC with the Focus A6, and they’re also one of the first headphones Trusted Reviews has tested that supports Bluetooth 6.0, which brings with it various new improvements in battery and connectivity.
This ER is suffering from the worst bout of lockdown since the COVID-19 pandemic. To prevent a ransomware attack, all online comms have been shut down in The Pitt season 2, meaning staff don’t have access to any resources or patient information.
While Dr. Baran Al-Hashimi (Sepideh Moafi) has been keen to up the AI ante since episode 2, efforts have spectacularly blown up in her face. The team are back to using whiteboards, pen and paper… but really, it’s only the tip of a chaotic iceberg.
Just another day at the office, then. But when does The Pitt season 2 episode 9 arrive on HBO Max?
Advertisement
What time can I watch The Pitt season 2 episode 9 on HBO Max?
The Pitt Season 2 | Official Trailer | HBO Max – YouTube
For US viewers, The Pitt season 2 episode 9 will drop on Thursday, March 5 at 6pm PT/ 9pm ET. As always, it’ll come out on HBO Max, too.
Internationally, you’re looking out for these timings:
Advertisement
US – 6pm PT / 9pm ET
Canada – 6pm PT / 9pm ET
India – Friday, March 6 at 7:30am IST
Singapore – Friday, March 6 at 10am SGT
Australia – Friday, March 6 at 1pm AEDT
New Zealand – Friday, March 6 at 3pm NZDT
You’ll notice that I’ve not included the UK here. That’s because HBO Max doesn’t launch in the UK until March 26. It hasn’t been released on Sky or Now TV either, which are usually the homes to HBO Originals on British shores.
In short: you’ll have to wait until HBO Max makes its UK debut to binge both seasons, but you’ll at least should be able to watch the season finale with everyone else on April 16.
Sign up for breaking news, reviews, opinion, top tech deals, and more.
When do new episodes of The Pitt season 2 come out?
Appreciation for Dana just because I can. (Image credit: Max)
New episodes of The Pitt will make landfall every Thursday in the US, and Fridays everywhere else. Here are the all-important dates you need to know about:
And of course, you can also follow TechRadar on YouTube and TikTok for news, reviews, unboxings in video form, and get regular updates from us on WhatsApp too.
The AI coding assistant Cursor has surpassed $2 billion in annualized revenue, according to a Bloomberg source. This individual says the four-year-old startup saw its revenue run rate double over the past three months.
The disclosure appears timed to counter a recent wave of skepticism. Last week, tweets went viral questioning whether Cursor’s momentum was stalling, citing high-profile defections by individual developers to competing tools — particularly Anthropic’s Claude Code.
Founded in 2022, Cursor initially sold its product primarily to individual developers. Over the last year, however, it has focused more on landing large corporate buyers, which now account for approximately 60% of revenue, according to Bloomberg.
While some individual developers and smaller startups have switched from Cursor to Claude Code, which is seen as more competitively priced, that attrition seems to higher-spending corporate customers who tend to stick around longer.
Advertisement
Beyond Claude Code, OpenAI’s coding tool Codex is also competing for share in the rapidly growing market for AI-assisted software development. Other startups in the space include Replit, Cognition, and Lovable.
Cursor was last valued at $29.3 billion when it raised a $2.3 billion funding round co-led by Accel and Coatue in November.
Cursor did not immediately respond to our request for comment.
Historically, moving and pointing a camera while filming was the job of a highly-skilled individual. However, there are machines that can do that, enabling all kinds of fancy movement that is difficult or impossible for a human to recreate. A great example is this pan-tilt build from [immofoto3d.]
The build uses a hefty cradle to mount DSLR-size cameras or similar. It’s controlled in the tilt axis by a chunky NEMA 17 stepper motor hooked up to a belt drive for smooth, accurate movement. Similarly, another stepper motor handles the pan axis, with an option for upgrade if you have a heavier camera rig that needs more torque to spin easily. Named Gantry Bot, it’s an open-source design with source files available, so you can make any necessary tweaks on your own. You will have to bring your own control mechanism, though—telling the stepper motors what to do and how fast to do it is up to you.
It’s a heavy-duty build, this one, and you’ll really want a decent metal-capable CNC to get it done, along with a 3D printer for all the plastic pieces. With that said, we’ve featured some other similar builds that might be more accessible if you don’t have a hardcore machine shop in the basement. If you’ve got your own impressive motion rig in the works, be sure to notify the tipsline!
Experts from Accenture, BearingPoint and Workhuman discuss how AI and automation can positively impact working life.
For many professionals artificial intelligence (AI) and automation have the power to transform day-to-day work. David Burke, a senior director of global talent acquisition and the employer brand at Workhuman explained that this transformation is effective not because it is ‘futuristic’ but because it meets the needs of an evolving workforce.
“It’s much more practical than that,” he told SiliconRepublic.com. “We’re using AI across our internal systems to reduce manual work, improve decision-making and help teams move faster. The goal isn’t to replace roles, it’s to remove friction.
“In areas like hiring, performance enablement and cross-functional collaboration, automation is taking care of the repeatable tasks and surfacing better data. That means our teams spend less time chasing information or managing processes and more time solving problems and focusing on work that actually moves the business forward.”
Advertisement
This is a viewpoint shared by Wendy Walsh, a talent and organisation lead at Accenture, who noted that AI and automation have not only altered the tools she uses in the workplace, but have actually changed how she personally “shows up at work”.
She said: “On a very practical level, I use AI every single day to think better. I use it to explore ideas, challenge my own assumptions, shape early thinking and get to a stronger point of view before anything ever becomes a document. For me, it’s less about productivity shortcuts and much more about cognitive support.”
Walsh added: “It helps me move faster to insight and clarity, not simply faster to output. The biggest difference is that my time has shifted away from preparing information and towards interpreting it.”
For BearingPoint’s Barry Haycock, who is a senior manager of data analytics and AI, when it comes to the topic of AI and automation, one subject that has dominated the conversation is agentic AI. He explained, he has noticed in the last 12 months or so, more and more people are choosing to use AI as an augmentation tool as opposed to automation.
Advertisement
He said: “In my personal day to day, I use AI to draft code I plan to write, or as a sounding board to discuss and tease out ideas before I start developing a slide deck or a document.
“In many areas, people can use AI to perform a detailed search, for example of in-house documents, or to summarise their upcoming week and help them plan their goals. I find it useful too for flagging upcoming deadlines and prioritising them every Monday.”
For Walsh, Burke and Haycock, amid the evolution brought about by the proliferation of advanced technologies and processes in the working ecosystem, comes the need for a modern upskilling strategy.
New day, new challenges
For Walsh, soft skills have grown in importance, with AI acting as a core reason why. She said: “As AI becomes part of everyday work, the qualities that really differentiate people are human ones. Skills in AI and data are important and technological literacy will increasingly be expected of everyone. But they’re not enough on their own.
Advertisement
“Looking ahead to 2030, many of the fastest-growing core skills are deeply human. AI can analyse, generate and optimise at incredible speed. But it can’t build trust. It can’t create belonging.
“It can’t decide what matters most in a moment of uncertainty. Technology is a powerful enabler, but it still needs people to shape it, question it and use it with purpose. The organisations that thrive will be those that invest just as seriously in human capability as they do in AI.”
Haycock said that in software development, MLOps and AIOps roles, business analytics is becoming the most important skill. He explained that, while the latest frontier AI models are excellent at coding or creating a script that a developer might need, the developer really needs to explain what’s required clearly.
He said: “This is traditionally considered a soft skill and in times gone by a developer might write the code to explain their thoughts. I’ve noticed that ‘explain-in-plain-language’ skills are developing across many technical roles lately.”
Advertisement
“Technical skills will always matter,” said Burke, “but they’re increasingly learnable at speed. AI can help people acquire knowledge and capabilities faster than ever. What’s harder to automate and therefore more valuable, are human skills.”
Skills such as judgement, communication, the ability to trust, context-setting, ethical decision-making and leading through ambiguity are among those that should be prioritised, especially as professionals are further expected to adopt and understand tech advancements.
“As technology accelerates, the differentiator won’t be who knows the most,” said Burke. “It will be who can interpret, connect and lead. The irony is that the more advanced AI becomes, the more deeply human capability becomes alongside it. That’s what ultimately drives sustained performance.”
Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.