Politics
Grammy Awards 2026: 27 Most Shocking And Memorable Moments Ever
And when you get some of the most prolific musicians in the world in the same room, it’s no surprise that the Grammys have more than delivered over the years.
In the lead-up to this year’s ceremony, we’re counting down 27 of the most shocking and memorable moments from the Grammys over the years…
Adele refuses to accept her Album Of The Year award (2017)
Adele swept the board following the release of her album, 25, but when she won over Beyoncé’s opus Lemonade, even the Hello singer herself had to admit something was up.
“I can’t possibly accept this award,” she said, “The Lemonade album was so monumental… so well thought out and so beautiful and soul-bearing, and we all got to see another side to you that we don’t always let us see.”
Addressing Beyoncé, Adele continued: “All us artists here, we fucking adore you. You are our light, and the way that you make me and my friends feel, the way you make my Black friends feel is empowering, and you make them stand up for themselves. I love you, and I always will.”
Beyoncé proves why she is the Queen (2023)

Timothy Norris via Getty Images
During the ceremony in 2023, Beyoncé made history when she became the person in history with the most Grammy wins (overtaking, believe it or not, Hungarian classical musician Sir Georg Solti), when Renaissance was awarded Best Dance/Electronic Album .
“I’m trying not to be too emotional and just receive this night,” she told the crowd on the night. “I want to thank God for protecting me. I’d like to thank my Uncle Johnny who is not here. But he’s here in spirit.
“I’d like to thank my parents, my father, my mother, for loving me and pushing me. I’d like to thank my beautiful husband, my beautiful three children who are at home watching. I’d like to thank the queer community for your love and for inventing this genre. God bless you.”
Jay-Z asks the Grammys one big question (2024)

VALERIE MACON via Getty Images
When collecting the Global Impact Award in 2024, Jay-Z couldn’t resist taking a pop at the fact that his wife, Beyoncé, had somehow still never won Album Of The Year, despite stellar past offerings like Lemonade and Renaissance and – oh yeah! – the fact she’s the most decorated Grammy recipient in history.
“I don’t want to embarrass this young lady, but she has more Grammys than anyone, and has never won Album Of The Year,” he pointed out in his acceptance speech.
“Even by your own metrics, that doesn’t work. Think about that. Most Grammys. Never won Album Of The Year. That doesn’t work.”
Beyoncé finally wins Album Of The Year (2025)
Let’s be honest, she probably deserved it several years earlier, but Beyoncé finally picked up Album Of The Year in 2025 for her country-inspired album Cowboy Carter.
Earlier in the ceremony, she also made history as the first Black woman to be awarded Best Country Album – and her stunned reaction to the news gifted the world a new meme in the process.
Lady Gaga egg-cedes eggs-pectations with her Grammys entrance (2011)

Jason Merritt/Getty Images
Nobody was egg-specting (alright, enough of that now) Lady Gaga to play it down when she arrived at the Grammys, where she would be opening the show with a debut performance of her then-new single Born This Way, but who could have anticipated this was how she’d make her entrance?
Playing up to the “birth” theme of her track, she was carried down the red carpet in a giant egg, which she emerged from to perform the song on stage later in the show.
‘Hey, Nicki, who’s your pal?’ (2012)

Picture Perfect/Shutterstock
Upping the game when it came to dramatic Grammys entrances, Nicki Minaj hit the red carpet in a red Versace cloak, on the arm of an older man who was dressed as the Pope.
She also opened the show that year with a medley of Roman’s Revenge, Roman Holiday and I Feel Pretty (yes, the one from West Side Story), in a performance laden with Catholic imagery which was supposed to show the exorcism of her alter-ego, Roman Zolanski.
Eminem and Elton John put on a show of solidarity after an unlikely duet (2001)

Kirk McKoy/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images
And while we’re on the subject of surprising performances, Eminem made headlines in 2001 when he welcomed Elton John to the stage with him to perform Dido’s parts on his hit Stan.
The two held hands at the end of the performance in what appeared to be the rapper’s attempts to put a stop to accusations of homophobia that had frequently been levelled against him.
Maybe just stop using homophobic language in your songs, Marshall, and then we’ll talk.
Amy Winehouse just can’t believe it as Rehab is named Record Of The Year (2008)
In 2008, Amy Winehouse’s personal life had eclipsed her music to the point she wasn’t even allowed to attend the Grammys that year, and was forced to perform over satellite.
When Rehab was given the distinction of winning Record Of The Year over acts like Beyoncé, Rihanna and Justin Timberlake, Amy’s endearing look of disbelief pushed people to take the late star into their hearts even more than they already had.
Justin Timberlake apologises post-Super Bowl and it’s all very uncomfortable (2004)

Frederick M. Brown/Getty Images
The 2004 Super Bowl took place just seven days before that year’s Grammys, meaning Justin Timberlake had already been splashed all over the news for exposing Janet Jackson’s breast during their Half-Time Show performance.
But if you thought it had been a bad week for him, spare a thought for Janet.
Justin performed his then-new single Señorita during the show, all the while Janet’s scheduled performance with Luther Vandross was axed completely.
And while the former N*SYNC singer apologised to anyone “offended” during his acceptance speech for Best Male Pop Vocal Performance (yes he won in a year when Janet had been blacklisted), he made no mention of the woman he’d been sharing the stage with.
It was another 17 years before Justin publicly apologised to Janet for not having done more to defend her at the time.
Pharrell Williams’ hat steals the show on the red carpet (2014)

ROBYN BECK/AFP via Getty Images
Remember that week when Pharrell Williams’ hat was photoshopped onto everything? Simpler times, eh?
Jennifer Lopez breaks the internet more than a decade before Kim Kardashian (2000)

Kirby Lee/WireImage/Getty Images
And while we’re on the subject of sartorial choices at the Grammys – behold! That dress.
This was an outfit so famous that Google literally invented their “Images” tab because so many people wanted to see what Jennifer Lopez was wearing on the red carpet.
Waiting For Tonight may have lost out to Cher’s Believe in the Best Dance Recording category, but who could deny that Jenny From The Block was the true winner that night?
And while we’re on the subject of scene-stealing moments on the Grammys red carpet (2025)

Kanye “Ye” West had been keeping something of a low profile ahead of the 2025 Grammys following a string of high-profile controversies, but he and his wife Bianca Censori wound up becoming the most talked-about guests at the ceremony that year when they walked the red carpet.
Initially, Bianca arrived in an oversized black fur coat, which she dropped in front of photographers to reveal a completely sheer mini-dress with nothing underneath.
Ye and Bianca were in all the headlines afterwards, but it wasn’t long until the rapper’s behaviour was once again facing widespread condemnation, and in the weeks and months that followed he’d professed himself a Nazi, begun selling a swastika t-shirt on his web store and released a new single titled “Heil Hitler”.
Around a year later, Ye issued a public apology for all of this, claiming that at the time he was in a manic episode as a result of his bipolar disorder and had “lost touch with reality”.
Céline Dion takes one massive step back into the spotlight (2024)

Following her diagnosis with stiff-person syndrome years earlier, Céline Dion had opted to take a step back from the spotlight, but at the 2024 Grammys, she surprised everyone when she returned to the stage to present Album Of The Year to Taylor Swift.
Céline walking out on stage received rapturous applause from the audience, and opened the door for her comeback performance at the Olympics later that year, as well as the revealing documentary I Am: Céline Dion.
Milli Vanilli have their Grammys taken away (1990)

Michael Ochs Archives/Getty Images
The German R&B duo was named Best New Artist in 1990, although their victory was short-lived.
It later transpired the two didn’t actually contribute any of the vocals heard on their releases, prompting the Music Academy to take back their titles.
Billy Porter debuts the headpiece that inspired a million memes (2020)

David Crotty/Patrick McMullan via Getty Images
Billy Porter’s red carpet fashion moments are constantly grabbing headlines, but this effort from the 2020 Grammys is one that particularly stands out.
It wasn’t so much the hat itself that got people talking, but the fact that it was motorised, and the movement of the bedazzled tassles ended up sparking a lot of memes on Twitter that year.
Billie Eilish makes her Grammys debut – and completely sweeps the board (2020)

David Crotty/Patrick McMullan via Getty Images
Billie Eilish made music history when she hit up her first Grammys in 2020, not only scooping the biggest four awards of the night – Album Of The Year, Record Of The Year, Song Of The Year and Best New Artist – but becoming the youngest musician in history to do so.
The then-18-year-old also performed When The Party’s Over during the ceremony with her brother and co-producer, Finneas.
Kanye ‘Ye’ West lives up to his stage-invading reputation (2015)
Having stormed the stage in defence of Beyoncé at the VMAs six years earlier, Ye stood up for Queen Bey once again when she was beaten in the Album Of The Year category by Beck.
Perhaps suddenly remembering the huge backlash that had come his way in the wake of the VMAs incident, Ye decided not to take to the mic this time around, instead shrugging his shoulders and swiftly returning to his front row seat.
The rapper later claimed that if Beck “respected artistry” he would have given his award to Beyoncé for her game-changing self-titled album.
A stage invader crashes Bob Dylan’s performance (1998)

Kevin Mazur/WireImage/Getty
The 1998 Grammys were clearly a year to remember, as in addition to Ol’ Dirty Bastard storming the stage, another unplanned moment helped make headlines, this time while Bob Dylan was performing.
While Bob Dylan performed Love Sick a bare-chested man with “Soy Bomb” written on his torso appeared behind him, and was eventually removed by security.
He later claimed: “Soy represents dense nutritional life. Bomb is, obviously, an explosive destructive force. So, ‘soy bomb’ is what I think art should be: dense, transformational, explosive life!”
Adele’s All I Ask performance doesn’t quite go to plan (2016)

Kevork Djansezian/Getty Images
Listen, we all have our off days, as Adele proved at the 2016 Grammys. Despite riding high on her recent comeback with 25, this performance had everyone talking for all the wrong reasons.
She later confessed to “crying all day” following her appearance at the Grammys, she told Ellen Degeneres: “During the changeover the microphones fell onto the piano strings which is what the guitar noise was… and then it kind of put the whole thing off really.”
And unfortunately, her bad Grammys luck didn’t end there (2017)

Kevin Winter/Getty Images for NARAS
Things got off to a much smoother start a year later, when she opened the show with a rendition of Hello.
However, when she came back later in the show to perform a surprise tribute to George Michael, things took something of a nosedive.
After a shaky start, she eventually stopped the performance completely one minute in, stating: “I know it’s live TV, I’m sorry. I can’t do it again like last year. I’m sorry for swearing and sorry for starting again, can we please start it again? I’m sorry, I can’t mess this up for him. I’m sorry.”
She then restarted the performance, and paid fitting tribute to the musical legend.
Jennifer Hudson pays beautiful tribute to Whitney Houston (2012)
Jennifer’s flawless version of I Will Always Love You would stand up by itself as a showcase for the Dreamgirls star’s amazing talent.
But when you take into account she’d had less than 24 hours to rehearse the song, as Whitney Houston had died the day before, it makes it all the more poignant and impressive.
Lady Gaga channels Ziggy Stardust as she prepares to honour David Bowie (2016)

Sadly not all tribute performances at the Grammys have won such unanimous praise.
Lady Gaga divided Bowie fans after she was selected to pay tribute to him at the Grammys that year, with some suggesting that by donning his famous outfits and attempting to imitate his performance style, she’d made the show more about herself than her idol.
Even Bowie’s son seemed nonplussed, although when Lorde put her own subdued spin on Life On Mars? at the Brits weeks later, he was far more impressed…
Madonna introduces Sam Smith’s divisive performance with a celebration of ‘troublemakers’ (2023)

Christopher Polk via Getty Images
By the time the Grammys rolled around in 2023, Sam Smith had been at the centre of plenty of controversy thanks to their hits Unholy and I’m Not Here To Make Friends – so there was no one better to introduce them at the Grammys than the Queen of Controversy herself.
“You guys need to know ― all you troublemakers out there ― you need to know that your fearlessness does not go unnoticed. You are seen, you are heard and, most of all, you are appreciated,” Madonna said during her intro.
It’s worth pointing out that both Sam and Madonna faced even more backlash after the Grammys, thanks to the former’s “devilish” performance and the latter’s appearance, which they shrugged off during their collab Vulgar, recorded that same week.
Taylor Swift uses her acceptance speech to fire back at Kanye West (2016)
Following a brief truce, Taylor Swift and Kanye West’s feud was well and truly back on by the 2016 Grammys, after he disparagingly referenced her in his song Famous.
Referring specifically to his notorious “I made that bitch famous” line, Taylor told the crowd: “To all the young women out there, there are going to be people out along the way who will try to undercut your success, and try to take credit for your accomplishments and your fame.”
And as we know, things didn’t end there…
Chappell Roan calls out music industry injustices after accepting Best New Artist (2025)

By the 2025 Grammys, Chappell Roan had already become known as an artist with no issues speaking her mind, which she proved while accepting the award for Best New Artist.
“I told myself if I ever won a Grammy and I got to stand up here, in front of the most popular people in music, I would demand that labels and the industry profiting millions of dollars off of artists would offer a liveable wage and healthcare, especially to developing artists,” she said, to massive applause from the audience.
She concluded: “Record labels need to treat their artists as valuable employees with a liveable wage, health insurance and protection. Labels, we got you. But do you got us?”
Predictably, not everyone in the industry responded well to Chappell’s comments, but within weeks, change was already being reported.
Ariana Grande gets all dressed up with no place to go (2019)

In 2019, Ariana Grande had been scheduled to perform at the Grammys, where she had been nominated for two awards.
Ultimately, she pulled out after a much-publicised row with a producer, but still ended up stealing the show on the night, sharing snaps of her red carpet outfit (which she sported to lay around the house), live-tweeting the whole event and even winning her first Grammy after snubbing the show completely.
She later wore an even more elaborate gown when she attended the following year’s awards.
Cardi B and Megan Thee Stallion give their WAP-tastic tune its live debut (2021)

Kevin Winter via Getty Images
The two rappers’ outrageous collab was a number-one smash on both sides of the Atlantic in 2020, but because of the pandemic, they weren’t able to perform it live together until the following year.
Still, Cardi and Megan made sure WAP got the live debut it deserved, with a performance so raunchy it sparked almost 1000 complaints to the FCC (America’s equivalent to Ofcom).
The 2026 Grammys will take place on Sunday 1 February.
Politics
Trump is salivating over vital minerals in Pakistan
The US left mountains of high-tech weaponry behind when it fled Afghanistan in defeat in 2021 – now, those weapons have flooded neighbouring Pakistan. And the resulting instability might be stopping the US mining the very rare Earth resources it craves.
The US has its sights on vast copper mines just ten miles inside Pakistan. CNN reported that China is already accessing the nearby Muhammad Khel Copper Mine in northern Waziristan.
For a sense of the scale of that mine, watch this:
But nearby, in south Waziristan:
lies another copper mine that Pakistan says can yield almost ten times as much, equivalent to a fifth of the copper America uses every year.
CNN said:
The prospect is so appealing to a Washington administration also hungry for resources that it has put up more than a billion dollars to get things moving.
So what is stopping them? In short, the imperial blowback of vast amounts of lost US military gear.
Billions in lost US arms
The US and her allies cut and run from Afghanistan after two decades of occupation in 2021. Today the Taliban rule the country once again. But that US chaotic exit mean up to $7bn worth of weapons and equipment were simply left behind.
Remarkable footage emerged back then of US troops trying to destroy – or ‘deny’ – military gear ahead of the US collapse:
But later Taliban footage made clear that weaponry, vehicles, and even helicopters were left behind:
The Foundation for Economic Education broke down some of the numbers involved. They said the giant arsenal included:
includes up to 22,174 Humvee vehicles, nearly 1,000 armored vehicles, 64,363 machine guns, and 42,000 pick-up trucks and SUVs.
There were mind boggling amounts of smalls arms – and even artillery:
the list of allegedly abandoned weaponry includes up to 358,530 assault rifles, 126,295 pistols, and nearly 200 artillery units.
Since the US was forced out the abandoned arms have been sold on – potentially fueling other conflicts.
In April 2025, the BBC was told:
Half a million weapons obtained by the Taliban in Afghanistan have been lost, sold or smuggled to militant groups
A UN report also warned that group including Al Qaeda:
were accessing Taliban-captured weapons or buying them on the black market.
But what are the implication in Waziristan with its rich resources?
Blowback again
As well as copper, CNN reported there were other minerals and metal in Waziristan which the US craves:
Pakistan says there is much more wealth beneath its soil –– an estimated $8 trillion in copper, lithium, cobalt, gold, antimony and other critical minerals.
This mineral reality has:
oiled an unlikely friendship with US President Donald Trump, who has put mineral acquisition at the heart of US foreign policy.
But CNN reporters who went to the region say they were shown:
hundreds of US-made rifles, machine guns and sniper rifles –– all leftovers from Washington’s war next door, and all seized from a new breed of jihadists and insurgents.
In fact, the reporters claimed, following a recent attack on a Pakistani military college 50 miles from the Muhammad Khel Copper Mine:
a colonel laid out a blood-soaked bandana and three M-16 rifles recovered from the militants. Written on the bandana, in Urdu and English, were slogans indicating the wearer’s readiness for martyrdom.
And:
stamped on the rifles were the words: “Property of US Govt. Manufactured in Columbia, South Carolina.”
In Peshawar, CNN recorded images of dozens of American weapons captured after raids:
And US weaponry has also been found in Balochistan in the hands of local insurgents. Defence analyst Muhammad Mubasher told the outlet American arms were now involved “in almost every encounter that happens”.
Following a recent suicide attack in Balochistan which killed 33 people provincial minister Sarfaraz Bugti said there was:
no doubt that most of the weapons used were US made that originated from Afghanistan.
Past US imperial adventures seem to be hindering new ones…
Trump’s Pakistan charm offensive
Despite the instability in the region – instability fueled by US blowback- President Donald Trump and Pakistani leaders have been getting cozy over potential mineral deals.
CNN reported that
Pakistan’s prime minister Shehbaz Sharif and Field Marshal Asim Munir took an unusual prop on their first joint visit to the White House in September [2025] –– a chest containing a trove of rare earths they said had been dug from Pakistan’s soil.
Adding:
Trump was charmed. The following month he praised Munir in public –– naming him: “My favorite field marshal.”
Pakistani politicians have been schmoozing ever since: they vocally supported Trump’s failed Nobel Peace Prize bid in July 2025, calling him a great peacemaker after recent India-Pakistan clashes. And their first shipment of rare earth minerals arrived in the US just a month after their September 2025 meeting.
Trump wants Pakistani resources. And the Pakistani government seem more than willing to give them up. The problem is that the war in Afghanistan has flooded the region with high tech US-made arms and equipment, fueling a new set of insurgencies. Trump proclaims himself a ‘Peace President’, but he clearly isn’t getting off the imperialist carousel quite yet.
Featured image via the Canary
Politics
Trump Says Putin Honoured Ukraine Ceasefire Despite Attacks
Donald Trump has insisted Vladimir Putin kept his word on implementing a week-long ceasefire in Ukraine, despite plenty of evidence to the contrary.
The US president told reporters the Russian president vowed not to target his European neighbour for seven days – from Sunday, January 25 until Sunday, February 1 – and suggested the recent attacks did not breach their agreement.
When reminded that Putin bombarded Ukrainian cities on Monday, Trump told reporters: “I know, it [the truce] was Sunday to Sunday.
“It opened up and he hit them hard last night. He kept his word on that. It’s a lot. But we will take anything, because it’s really, really cold out there.”
But Trump only declared this supposed truce last Thursday, saying: “I personally asked President Putin not to fire into Kyiv and the various towns for a week and he agreed to do that.
“And I have to tell you, it was very nice. People said, ‘Don’t waste the call, you’re not going to get that.’
“And he did it and we’re very happy that they did it because on top of everything else that’s not what they need is missiles coming into their towns and cities.”
Russia struck Ukraine hours later, sending a total of 111 long-range drones and a ballistic missile into the country.
A city bus driver was then killed along with five civilians in Kherson, with authorities reporting ongoing attacks across the country.
Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy said he understood the ceasefire had started late last Friday.
He said while there was no formal ceasefire agreement, both sides agreed on the US plan to halt strikes on each other’s energy facilities.
But Russia attacked again on Sunday, taking out a bus carrying miners in the Dnipropetrovsk region in a deadly assault.
Meanwhile, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters Putin had specifically agreed not to strike Kyiv, suggesting that did not apply to the whole country.
He said: “I can say that President Trump did indeed make a personal request to President Putin to refrain from striking Kyiv for a week, until February 1, as a way to create more hospitable conditions for negotiations.”
The pause was supposed to last while US-led trilateral peace talks took place in Abu Dhabi.
Speaking on Wednesday, after the latest attacks, Zelenskyy said: “We await the reaction of America to the Russian strikes.
“It was the US proposal to halt strikes on energy during diplomacy and severe winter weather.
“The president of the United States made the request personally. Russia responded with a record number of ballistic missiles.”
Politics
Epstein media circus doesn’t centre victims
BBC News reported yesterday that the US Department of Justice has had to remove thousands of documents related to convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, as they have compromised the identities of women who have been victimised by the elite-run web of sexual violence, abuse, and exploitation.
The outlet further stated that the “flawed redactions” of the Epstein Files have made nearly 100 survivors vulnerable, with the women’s lives “turned upside down.” However, the mainstream media circus around the release of the files is conveniently diminishing both the horror and scrutiny of these atrocious crimes, as well as the accountability of the powerful figures responsible for them.
One thing is clear. The release of the Epstein files was certainly not to protect the victims and survivors of Epstein’s depraved network. The women and girls who bore the brunt of these atrocities have been sidelined even in the official reveal of their experiences.
Epstein files: accountability should be in the interests of victims, not their abusers
According to BBC News, on Friday 30th January two lawyers for Epstein’s victims insisted that a New York federal judge order the DOJ to remove the website holding the files. They stated that the negligent release was:
the single most egregious violation of victim privacy in one day in United States history.
At the Canary, we agree wholeheartedly.
This US-led failure to redact identifying images and names of victims has made the complete removal of such content the only viable response. Once again, women around the world are left feeling exposed and vulnerable, while so-called efforts to ‘protect women’ operate instead to shied powerful perpetrators of abuse. Yet again, a manipulative and abusive system has retraumatised the very women it was ostensibly meant to serve.
Given US President Donald Trump’s appearance in the files, photographed with Epstein’s so-called “harem” of young girls, too little attention focuses on the fact that rich, powerful men once again seem able to deter and deflect true accountability. Anyone who has experienced abuse knows this all too well: men often act without recognizing – or admitting – the harm they cause.
Abolish the Monarchy. https://t.co/yyNBmVlN6z
— Zarah Sultana MP (@zarahsultana) February 1, 2026
Women have had enough
Unfortunately for those powerful patriarchal arseholes, many women see straight through it and are at the end of their tether. They remind us that unless we dismantle the structures and hierarchies of power, the abuse will never end. As a white woman, I believe it is essential that white Western women confront our complicity – whether intentional or not – and come together in solidarity against all abuse. This means rejecting the Western patriarchal scapegoating of ‘brown men’ and confront the reality that white men have inflicted – and continue to inflict – vast harm. Abuse is about power; not race.
We wrote recently on the practice of Nazi-like eugenics amongst Epstein and his ilk of superior, privileged rich boys. Discussing the characteristics of the men who have assumed powerful positions in politics and business, our own Robert Freeman wrote:
All this is ultimately the product of an economic and political system that practically guarantees the most poisonous humans imaginable rise to the top. Capitalism rewards the most ruthless and domineering among us, not the kindest and most compassionate.
Those attracted to being a CEO — with the ability to control potentially thousands of lives — are unlikely to be good people. Once there, wealth grants them the ability to evade the law and control the political realm. With greater power comes greater impunity, and an already degraded soul rots still further. It’s a system that selects for, then refines, the worst traits of our species.
The Epstein documents have produced an outpouring of fury, and an increasing clarity to the realisation that an entire system needs to be dismantled and reconstructed into something less misanthropic. We’ve had enough warnings by now of “Nazi like” reprobates controlling our lives. An imminent return to something akin to Nazism looms unless an alternative course is pursued urgently.
Not all men: But it is all women
There is a reassuring factor for women that yes, it is not ‘all men’. Nevertheless, many women with platforms have demanded that we no longer center reassuring men that we aren’t ‘demonising all of them’. Instead, they insist that we finally center the very valid truth that whilst it might not be all men (thankfully), it is all women and girls.
All women and girls are likely to experience abuse or its consequences at some point in their lives. This truth is depressingly clear: the Epstein scandal proves that abuse does not occur in isolation – it spreads widely, thrives systemically, and men carry it out overwhelmingly. Even women and girls who never experience abuse firsthand live alongside its effects: they support survivors, navigate fear, and adapt their lives to avoid risk. The problem does not lie in individual morality alone; power structures actively enable abuse to continue and minimise its consequences, leaving no woman untouched by its impact.
It is time we empathise and choose to empower women and girls, not continue this toxic cycle of even the reveal of abuse not centring the abused.
The Canary’s Dr Shola Mos-Shogbamimu put across this argument powerfully and poignantly in a post on Instagram:
Dr Shola: ‘we will shut this shit down’
Where are the white women? I’m looking, but I can’t see. Let me put my glasses on. I still don’t see them. You see, my shattered eye, we’re just wondering where the white women are following the release of the Epstein files. Because I don’t see white women protesting on the streets. I do not see white women collectively, undeniably being visible and vocal in exercising their white power, white fragility, and white tears to hold to account powerful white men that have subjected and deliberately targeted white women and white girls for rape, sexual molestation, sexual abuse, and sex trafficking. Where are the white women? How are white women so collectively silent and performatively powerless.
Let’s break it down. Where are your bastions of white femininity? The protectors of the white female body? Where are your white female politicians and your white female media personalities? White female commentators? You know, those advocates of anti-Muslim, anti-Islam, anti-immigration because we have to protect the women and children where they are right now because everything seems quite crooked. We’re the white women who take to the streets protesting and demanding that white women and children be protected from the asylum seekers and the refugees and the immigrants and they do not even give an iota of that same energy to powerful white men who pose a greater significant risk to their bodies than asylum seekers, refugees and immigrants.
Where are the white women whose white peers have unjustly sent black men to their deaths by state execution, either by the police or by the state because they have lied? Huh? Oh my God, I’m just as scared to say black man. Where are your white peers against a powerful white man that have targeted you for rape and sexual abuse? Where are the white women who exercise white power on a daily basis to say to black men, no, you don’t work there. No, you don’t live there. You don’t belong here. Where’s that white power now against a powerful white man? Now I’m not talking about the white women who’ve been doing the Lord’s work, speaking out against these powerful white men and have endured all kinds of persecutions including character assassination, who’ve been actively anti-racist, who’ve been unequivocally against the patriarchal power structure. Now I stand with them in solidarity.
Now I’m talking to you multitudes of white women who excuse the inexcusable, defend the indefensible because you’re telling us it was never about protecting white women and children. You see the stats don’t lie. White men commit the most sexual crimes, rape, sexual abuse of children, and sex trafficking. That’s the fact. The fact also is that the problem are men. Yes, not all men. But you see, if we work together collectively, white, black, and brown women, against a patriarchal power construct that protects the men who commit these crimes, we will shut this shit down.
As Dr Shola powerfully states, it is time for women and girls everywhere, regardless of ethnicities or religion, to come together.
We must find our humility and refuse to continue being the continual playthings of patriarchal men.
Featured image via the Canary
Politics
Bridgerton star has praised season 4's uncomfortable sex scenes
!function(n){if(!window.cnx){window.cnx={},window.cnx.cmd=[];var t=n.createElement(‘iframe’);t.display=’none’,t.onload=function(){var n=t.contentWindow.document,c=n.createElement(‘script’);c.src=”//cd.connatix.com/connatix.player.js”,c.setAttribute(‘async’,’1′),c.setAttribute(‘type’,’text/javascript’),n.body.appendChild(c)},n.head.appendChild(t)}}(document);(new Image()).src=”https://capi.connatix.com/tr/si?token=19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″;cnx.cmd.push(function(){cnx({“playerId”:”19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″,”mediaId”:”b4e438c3-3507-4762-913c-720170c1c80d”}).render(“69836f74e4b0926afe69db14”);});
Politics
Politics Home Article | Charitable partnership enhances support to veterans
Veterans Aid (VA), the UK’s frontline charity for veterans in crisis, has become the latest charitable partner of the Honourable Artillery Company (HAC), the oldest regiment in the British Army.
VA has been operating since 1932 and enjoys an externally validated success rate of 90% in terms of transforming broken lives. For the next three years it will be the beneficiary of fundraising events and other support from the HAC in acknowledgement of the two organisations’ shared commitment to those who have served, and their families.
CEO of Veterans Aid Prof Hugh Milroy said, “We were delighted and honoured to have the value of our work acknowledged in this way by the HAC. VA deals with the consequences of crisis and poverty; issues that don’t sit comfortably with the public image of military heroism and glamour. In fact, we operate in the real world, practicing the real values of the military family where ‘man down’ is a call to immediate action. As an organisation that spends hardly anything on advertising or self-promotion, we are singularly mindful of how valuable support from organisations like the HAC can be in helping us reach donors and – more importantly – those who so desperately need our help.”
Marcus Simson, CE of the Honourable Artillery Company said, ‘’We are delighted to support Veterans Aid as our sponsored charity. We have a shared commitment to those who have served and value the vital and tailored services Veterans Aid provides. Many are not available elsewhere. They include mental health care, housing assistance, job training, and peer support. These programs restore dignity, stability, and purpose, helping veterans and their families thrive rather than merely survive. Too often they are the only thing that prevents tragedy. The HAC is clear that all of its support to Veterans Aid will go directly to helping those in need. For the HAC, contributing time or resources is a tangible way to express our gratitude, uphold our shared values and ensure that those who protected our freedoms are never left behind and remembered with respect – always, everywhere.’’
The two organisations also share a relationship with the church of St Botolph-without-Bishopsgate whose links with both are strong. St Botolph’s is home to the HAC’s Regimental Chapel, which commemorates members of the Company who died in conflicts. It also houses the engraving of Hogarth’s Good Samaritan gifted by Veterans Aid to the church, as a symbol of its own partnership with the church.
Politics
Water companies are taking us all for a ride
Campaigner and singer Feargal Sharkey has, once again, dressed down the privatised water companies.
Water companies: taking the p*ss
On social media, Sharkey said:
You’ll want to be sitting down for this bit. Water companies are currently £82.7 billion in debt, have paid themselves £85 billion in dividends, leak over a trillion of litres of water per year, dump sewage for almost 4 million hours per year, have been convicted of over 1,200 criminal acts since 1989 and an average of 35% of your bill goes on nothing but paying more interest and yet more dividends. And not a single company has ever lost their operating licence.
When the water companies were privatised in 1989 under Margaret Thatcher, they were debt free. Since then, they have accumulated £82.7 billion in debt, as Sharkey notes. At the same time, they have failed to invest in infrastructure to fix our dated sewage system. Instead, they dump sewage in our rivers and the ocean for millions of hours a year. And they haven’t just creamed cash rather than investing. Water companies sold off 35 reservoirs in just five years, making £26 million from flogging what were public assets.
On top of that, as Sharkey points out, a University of Greenwich study for We Own It found a “privatisation tax” of 35% on our water bills. In other words, we’re spending over one-third more than we need to every time we turn on the taps.
Privatisation: 140 years into the past
Water was brought into public ownership in the late 1800s. Even back then, people knew it was a natural monopoly and a daily essential for all humans. Selling it off just means one then rents it at higher cost.
Thatcher’s government and then the neoliberals in Labour, Reform and the Tories maintaining privatisation of water, have brought us 140 years into the past.
Sharkey is spot on to take down the polluting profiteers.
Featured image via the Canary
Politics
Homeless children in Scotland pass 10,000 mark
The number of children who are homeless and in temporary accommodation in Scotland has passed 10,000.
The latest figures from the Scottish Government show that, in the six months to 30 September 2025, 10,480 children were in temporary accommodation.
People experiencing homelessness increasing
In total, there were 18,092 households in temporary accommodation, a 9% increase from 16,634 in 2024. This is also a new record high. Households spent an average of 237 days in temporary accommodation.
There was also a 4% increase in the total open homeless applications. The figure now stands at 33,006.
The number of people sleeping rough has also reached its highest in over a decade – at 1,083. This means that one in 10 applicants was sleeping outside.
One notably higher figure is the number of households not being offered temporary accommodation. The number has risen from 7,565 in 2024 to 10,710 in 2025. Most of these were in Glasgow (6,815 out of 10,710). The local authority also reported high numbers in Edinburgh – with 3,585 instances over the six months.
A figure that has improved is the number of breaches of the unsuitable accommodation order. This states that:
the maximum number of days that local authorities can use unsuitable accommodation for any homeless person is 7 days and has the effect of ending stays in unsuitable accommodation, such as B&Bs, apart from in emergency situations.
In the last 6 months, there were 3,635 breaches, which is a 12% improvement.
Changing characteristics
Of the homeless applicants, 16% were from households that had been granted either refugee status or leave to remain. This allows non-UK nationals to stay lawfully in the UK following an application made from within the country.
In total, 2% of all applications cited “left asylum accommodation” as the reason for them being homeless.
There was also a decrease in the number of white applicants, specifically white Scottish applicants. Conversely, there was an increase in the number of African, Caribbean, Black, Asian, and Arab applicants.
This comes as the number of refugees experiencing homelessness across the UK has more than doubled in the last two years. In total, 4,434 refugees and migrants were accommodated from 2024-25, the largest number on record. Of these, 2,008 were refugees — a 106% increase on the previous year.
In September, Màiri McAllan, Scottish Cabinet Secretary for Housing, pledged funding for affordable housing, along with measures to support people in moving out of temporary housing.
Additionally, the Scottish government said it planned to invest up to £4.9bn over the next four years. This would help it achieve its target of delivering 36,000 affordable homes by 2030.
In a statement, McAllan said:
The figures do speak to the severe pressure that services are under due to the Home Office’s mismanagement of the asylum system, particularly in Glasgow.
Politics
ICE leave imperial ‘death cards’ behind
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) paramilitaries are leaving custom-made ace of spades ‘death cards’ at the scene of migrant snatch operations. The ghoulish practice has imperial origins. US troops used to stuff cards into the mouths of the Vietnamese dead. The practice – consider yourself trigger warned here, please – was even filmed for use in official military propaganda.
The truth is this isn’t the first example of long-ago wars inflecting US immigration policy. America’s imperial past and present is so deeply interwoven into Trumpian policy that we don’t always see it. Yet these cards are one of several crystal-clear examples lately.
ICE leave death cards
The Intercept’s Nick Turse picked up the story on 3 February. It appears to have originally been reported on 22 January 2025 by Latino community organisation Voces Unidas. After a snatch mission in Eagle Country, Colorado, relatives searching for their kidnapped family members found the cards at the scene:
After detaining 10 Latino community members, ICE agents left ace of spades cards—widely known as the “death card”—inside the abandoned vehicles. The cards, later found by family members, clearly identify ICE’s Denver Field Office.
The US used the ace of spades design because it supposedly had particular cultural power in Vietnam.
As Turse explained:
During the Vietnam War, U.S. troops regularly adorned Vietnamese corpses with “death cards” — either an ace of spades or a custom-printed business card claiming credit for their kills.
Adding:
A 1966 entry in the Congressional Record noted that due to supposed Vietnamese superstitions regarding the ace of spades, “the U.S. Playing Card Co. had been furnishing thousands of these cards free to U.S. servicemen in Vietnam who requested them.”
After Vietnam, as Voces Unidas pointed out, the cards were adopted:
by white supremacist groups to demean people of color.
On the face of it, this makes a lot of sense. ICE’s recruiting strategy is less about nods to racism and more about openly using fascist imagery, mottosm and even songs to attract recruits who align with a mission to ethnically purify the US.
Long history of racial violence
Alex Sánchez, president and CEO of Voces Unidas said:
We are disgusted by ICE’s actions in Eagle County. Leaving a racist death card behind after targeting Latino workers is deliberate intimidation rooted in a long history of racial violence.
He added:
This is an abuse of power, and it has no place in any society that claims to value human dignity.
Sanchez said family members of the disappeared had the cards in their possession. He confirmed they appeared custom-made and meant to terrify ICE’s targets:
These were not from a doctored deck of cards. These were designed with this legacy in mind. They were printed on some sort of stock paper and cut in the dimensions of a card.
Neither ICE nor the Department of Homeland Security deigned to explain the cards.
The term ‘imperial boomerang’ has used liberally to describe what is happening in the US – and correctly so. Trump’s war on immigration is a cover for a war on the left and on migrant labour. He seeks to both create an enemy and eliminate rivals, not just at home but also abroad, as we’ve seen with Venezuela and Iran.
But there is more to it. Let’s not forget that a senior Border Patrol official invoked the Confederacy – the slave-owning losers of the Civil War – in a recently discovered email chain.
In truth, the whole spectacle is alive with fascist nostalgia about lost wars. It feels like fascists – many of whom are clearly now in ICE – are trying to correct various imperial and colonial emasculations through racist violence. Trump has given them the permission, the weapons and the authority to do so. At the very least, they are drawing on those vengeful energies.
From the War on Terror to the Confederate fantasy of a ‘lost cause’ and, now, Vietnam, the ghosts of America’s violent past are restless.
Featured image via Voces Unidas
Politics
Palantir have major ties to Epstein
Evil tech giant and NHS leech Palantir has links with wealthy sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. And Labour MP Dawn Butler has rightly called for scrutiny.
Butler insisted we should “not ignore” the connection between Palantir co-founder Peter Thiel and Epstein, particularly because it has infiltrated our public health system:
We can not ignore the fact that Peter Thiel co-founder of Palantir is featured numerous times in the Epstein files https://t.co/QXoz6C94D1
— Dawn Butler ✊🏾💙 (@DawnButlerBrent) February 3, 2026
She had previously highlighted how the Conservatives let dodgy tech giants Palantir, Google, Microsoft, and Amazon get their grubby hands during the Covid-19 pandemic on our health data. In 2021, she expressed concern over the lack of transparency and the consequences for our data privacy.
Palantir embeds within the US, the UK, and Israel
As the Canary has reported, Palantir:
- Is staunchly pro-Israel.
- Has “deep ties to British and American security agencies”.
- Has gained lots of experience helping to smear progressives, back right-wing causes, and mistreat vulnerable people.
- Had links to the dodgy campaigning surrounding Brexit.
- Is already deep within the UK’s military and police establishment.
- Received investments from the shady multimillionaire donor behind Keir Starmer’s Labour Party.
- Has just got a £240m deal to give services to the British military, as Starmer has cosied up even further to the company (with help from Epstein friend and general prince of darkness Peter Mandelson).
- Had Epstein in its corner, encouraging close friend and Israeli war criminal Ehud Barak to learn more about the company. It later ended up profiting from Israel’s genocide in Gaza.
- Is getting deeper and deeper into the US government, and is a key part of Donald Trump’s dystopian domestic terror campaign.
- Co-founder Thiel powered US vice-president JD Vance’s rise to prominence.
- CEO and co-founder Alex Karp is a vile warmonger, arrogant gaslighter, and misanthropic authoritarian. He seems to think war crimes are fine, that the West has “obvious, innate superiority”, and that violence (rather than ideas) is the path to dominance.
Neocolonialism
Palantir has latched onto the US imperial project and is now a prominent part of it. By extension, this means entering junior partners in the UK and Israel too. And apparent intelligence assets like Epstein helped to ensure companies like Palantir become part of this system of racist brutality and dominance.
Journalist Whitney Webb has written about:
The Sordid Union Between Intelligence and Organized Crime That Gave Rise to Jeffrey Epstein
And because of developments like artificial intelligence, mass surveillance, and drones, the baton has passed from people like Epstein to companies like Palantir. As Webb said in 2025:
you don’t really need Epstein in the Surveillance Era…
[Israel and others] don’t really need blackmail anymore…
Palantir, Peter Thiel’s company… that’s the new Jeffrey Epstein…
“They don’t…need blackmail anymore…Palantir…[is] the new Jeffrey Epstein…if they want to blackmail [you]…they…access…your finances, tweets you’ve liked…[&] the disturbing thing about Palantir is…it’s…about pre-crime. [They’re] pioneers of predictive policing”… pic.twitter.com/3Il0l3IhuR
— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) August 1, 2025
Countries around the world have already started to realise the importance of technological independence from the US and its dystopian corporations like Palantir. And if UK politicians don’t heed calls to do the same, they need to lose their jobs.
Because for the sake of humanity and our future, we should not only “not ignore” all of this, as Dawn Butler rightly said. We also need to actively campaign to kick companies like Palantir out once and for all.
Featured image via the Canary
Politics
Fox hunt ‘desecrates’ tranquil burial site
A pack of hounds from the Middleton fox hunt has run amok through a woodland burial site in North Yorkshire. The incident happened during the last week of January 2026.
Footage captured by national animal welfare charity the League Against Cruel Sports shows the hounds marauding through the Mowthorpe Garden of Rest within the Howardian Hills Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. The hounds ran across graves with the hunt failing to stop or divert them.
This is the same Middleton Hunt that the Canary witnessed a couple of weeks earlier. On that occasion, the hunt was behaving violently and showing no sign of laying a trail. Unless the law changes, and it may do before long, fox hunts can still ride out. But, legally, they can only ‘trail hunt’. This means following a scent trail, rather than actual foxes.
However, until the government moves decisively to ban them for good, fox hunts are continuing to cause havoc across the countryside.
The League’s chief executive Emma Slawinksi has slammed the hunt for its actions:
It beggars belief that the hunt would have laid a trail through a burial site so either the Middleton Hunt has no regard for the sanctity of this site or, as is more likely, the hounds were on the trail of a fox.
They have desecrated this burial site in a bid to carry on with a blood sport that was banned 20 years ago.
Hunts are behaving in an appalling way, intent on chasing and killing foxes and not caring about their anti-social behaviour and the impact they are having on local communities and the people who live in the countryside.
The hounds were also caught terrorising local wildlife with two deer filmed fleeing for their lives.
‘Trail hunting a smokescreen for fox hunts’
The footage of the Middleton Hunt is being released the day after Channel 4 News aired footage gathered by the League of the same hunt’s hounds chasing a fox on Christmas Eve 2025.
The League released figures ahead of Boxing Day showing an increase in the number of reports of hunts chasing foxes and wreaking havoc on rural communities.
Chief superintendent Matt Longman, the national lead on fox hunting crime, has described trail hunting as a “smokescreen for illegal fox hunting”. He also described illegal hunting as “prolific”.
The government has announced it will launch a consultation to ban trail hunting, though this has suffered delays.
Slawinksi added:
I would urge the public who are sick and tired of the behaviour of fox hunts to take part in the government’s hunting consultation.
The time for change is now. We want to see trail hunting banned, the loopholes in the law removed, the end of so-called ‘accidental’ hunting, and jail sentences introduced to act as a deterrent for those who would break new stronger fox hunting laws.
Featured image via the Canary
-
Crypto World5 days agoSmart energy pays enters the US market, targeting scalable financial infrastructure
-
Crypto World6 days ago
Software stocks enter bear market on AI disruption fear with ServiceNow plunging 10%
-
Politics5 days agoWhy is the NHS registering babies as ‘theybies’?
-
Crypto World6 days agoAdam Back says Liquid BTC is collateralized after dashboard problem
-
Video2 days agoWhen Money Enters #motivation #mindset #selfimprovement
-
Tech9 hours agoWikipedia volunteers spent years cataloging AI tells. Now there’s a plugin to avoid them.
-
NewsBeat5 days agoDonald Trump Criticises Keir Starmer Over China Discussions
-
Politics2 days agoSky News Presenter Criticises Lord Mandelson As Greedy And Duplicitous
-
Fashion5 days agoWeekend Open Thread – Corporette.com
-
Crypto World4 days agoU.S. government enters partial shutdown, here’s how it impacts bitcoin and ether
-
Sports4 days agoSinner battles Australian Open heat to enter last 16, injured Osaka pulls out
-
Crypto World4 days agoBitcoin Drops Below $80K, But New Buyers are Entering the Market
-
Crypto World2 days agoMarket Analysis: GBP/USD Retreats From Highs As EUR/GBP Enters Holding Pattern
-
Crypto World5 days agoKuCoin CEO on MiCA, Europe entering new era of compliance
-
Business5 days ago
Entergy declares quarterly dividend of $0.64 per share
-
Sports2 days agoShannon Birchard enters Canadian curling history with sixth Scotties title
-
NewsBeat1 day agoUS-brokered Russia-Ukraine talks are resuming this week
-
NewsBeat2 days agoGAME to close all standalone stores in the UK after it enters administration
-
Crypto World18 hours agoRussia’s Largest Bitcoin Miner BitRiver Enters Bankruptcy Proceedings: Report
-
Crypto World6 days agoWhy AI Agents Will Replace DeFi Dashboards
