Connect with us

Business

5 mistakes that cost money when connecting payments in Europe

Published

on

5 mistakes that cost money when connecting payments in Europe

Payment integration often begins as an IT project: choose a provider, connect the API, complete the checks, and go live.

The way a business builds its payment infrastructure is now a commercial decision. A poor setup causes more declines and drives up support costs. Revenue suffers long before the technical team calls the integration a failure.

The European payment market is changing faster than most businesses can adapt. PSD3 will change how providers handle authentication, fraud data, and customer protection. The EU Instant Payments Regulation is requiring payment providers to offer instant euro transfers.

What works in Germany may reduce conversions in France. A checkout optimised for Spain can underperform in the Netherlands. Even neighbouring markets often rely on completely different payment habits.

The pressure is greater for High-Risk businesses in sectors such as iGaming and Forex. Banks apply different risk policies, approval rates fluctuate between providers, and a single integration decision can affect approval rates for months after launch.

Advertisement

Many of the costs companies associate with payment processing in Europe are not caused by fees alone. They come from failed transactions, payment declines, abandoned checkouts, manual operations, delayed settlements, and rebuilding integrations that were never designed to scale.

Why payment integration in Europe is more complex

Europe is often treated as a single payments market. The Single Euro Payments Area (SEPA) and the Instant Payments Regulation have created common standards for many financial institutions. The move from PSD2 towards PSD3 will affect authentication, fraud controls and provider responsibilities. Merchants should review whether their current setup is ready.

Customers across the continent pay differently and expect different checkout experiences. In the Netherlands, iDEAL remains dominant for online purchases. German consumers still favour direct bank transfers and invoice payments. Southern European markets show stronger card usage, while open banking payments are gaining ground momentum across both the EU and the UK.

Payment integration in Europe needs to reflect local customer behaviour without forcing the operations team to manage a separate integration and dashboard for every market.

Advertisement

PSD3 introduces stricter rules around authentication and fraud prevention. The EU Instant Payments Regulation requires payment service providers to offer real-time euro transfers under the same pricing conditions as standard SEPA transfers. Faster settlement gives customers and merchants quicker access to funds, but it also leaves less time to catch processing errors.

High-Risk merchants face additional pressure because payment providers apply different risk criteria depending on industry, transaction volume, and geography. A payment route that performs well for an e-commerce retailer may generate lower approval rates for a Forex platform or an iGaming operator. Merchants expanding into multiple European countries often discover that approval rates differ significantly between providers.

Baymard Institute research shows that checkout friction remains a significant cause of cart abandonment. Worldpay’s latest Global Payments Report also shows that digital wallets, account-to-account payments, and alternative payment methods continue to gain market share across Europe, reducing reliance on traditional card payments.

For a growing business, payment processing in Europe is part of the customer experience. It needs the same level of localisation as pricing and language.

Advertisement

Understanding the European payments ecosystem

European payments are shaped by regulation and local customer behaviour. Success depends on understanding how these layers interact rather than treating them as separate challenges.

A checkout can pass every PSD2 requirement and still underperform in the Netherlands if it does not offer iDEAL. Equally, adding every available payment option without considering fraud controls or routing logic often increases operational costs instead of improving performance.

Five payment trends matter most for merchants entering Europe.

Trend Business impact
Instant payments Faster settlement and better cash flow, alongside rising expectations for real-time transfers
Open banking Lower processing costs, higher trust in account-to-account (A2A) payments, and reduced dependence on cards
Payment localisation Higher conversion rates through local payment methods and familiar checkout experiences
Stronger regulation More investment required in compliance, fraud monitoring,
and authentication
Payment orchestration Better approval rates through smart routing and multiple provider management

[иллюстрация: оформить таблицу в фирменном стиле]

Advertisement

Many businesses still struggle to offer enough local payment methods when entering new European markets. Others experience declining approval rates because transactions are routed through a single provider regardless of geography or issuer behaviour. Fraud losses remain a concern. New compliance requirements are adding more work for payment and risk teams.

SEPA simplifies euro transfers across participating countries. Different currencies remain in use, while domestic banking systems operate alongside SEPA.

The UK follows its own regulatory system under the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), while faster payments and open banking have evolved independently from the EU’s payment stack.

Companies that treat payment integration as an ongoing optimisation process generally achieve higher payment conversion rates than those relying on a one-time implementation.

Advertisement

Five costly mistakes

Most payment integration problems develop gradually as businesses grow. The same five mistakes recur among businesses entering European markets. While they are especially common among High-Risk merchants, they affect virtually any company managing cross-border payments across Europe.

Mistake 1: Ignoring local payment preferences

Payment behaviour varies widely between countries. Many customers actively look for familiar local payment methods before deciding whether to complete a purchase.

Dutch customers overwhelmingly expect iDEAL. German users often prefer direct bank transfers or invoice-based payments. Mobile payments are widely used across Scandinavia. Open banking payments grow across both the UK and continental Europe.

Customers hesitate when they cannot immediately recognise a trusted payment method. Some leave without paying. Others switch to competitors that offer payment experiences better aligned with local expectations.

Advertisement

The problem is sharper on mobile.

Younger users increasingly expect biometric authentication, QR payments, or digital wallets instead of manually entering card details. Every additional field, redirect or authentication step increases the probability of abandonment.

Currencies, language, checkout design, payment options — everything can affect conversion. Showing the most relevant payment methods first can improve payment conversion without changing the underlying payment setup.

Payment localisation belongs in the launch plan. Adding it after conversion falls is usually more expensive.

Advertisement

Mistake 2: Skipping compliance checks

Compliance gaps often remain hidden until volumes rise. Then providers request updated documents, banks increase monitoring, and some payment flows begin to see more declines.

A compliance review can freeze settlement or delay a market launch.

Payment teams now have to prepare for:

  • the transition from PSD2 to PSD3
  • stronger AML requirements
  • enhanced Strong Customer Authentication (SCA) rules
  • stricter fraud-monitoring requirements

Payment providers are also becoming more selective when onboarding merchants operating in High-Risk industries.

Some businesses rely on payment providers that are not fully aligned with future regulatory changes. Others postpone fraud monitoring until chargebacks begin to increase. Documentation is treated as a one-off onboarding exercise instead of an ongoing operational process.

Advertisement

For companies handling payment processing in Europe, compliance should be part of the operating model. Working with providers that actively monitor regulatory developments and update their authentication, monitoring and reporting processes as the rules change reduces the risk of disruption later.

Mistake 3: Hardcoding provider integrations

Some businesses start with one PSP and later add separate providers for individual methods or markets.

Businesses relying on a single payment provider have limited ability to redirect traffic during technical disruptions. Each additional provider brings another API connection and reconciliation process. Over time, payment teams spend more resources managing integrations than raising approval rates and reducing failed payments.

Without dynamic payment routing, every transaction follows the same path regardless of issuer behaviour or approval history. If one provider experiences lower authorisation rates in a particular country, every declined transaction directly affects revenue. If the route underperforms, every transaction sent through it carries the same disadvantage.

Advertisement

Payment orchestration addresses this challenge by separating business logic from individual payment providers.

A payment architecture that connects several providers through one integration is significantly easier to scale than one built around a single integration. SPAYZ.io gives High-Risk merchants access to 55+ payment solutions through a single API integration. Availability depends on the market and the required payin/payout flow.

Mistake 4: Poor testing and error handling

A poorly tested integration may look fine on launch day.

Many merchants validate only successful transactions while overlooking the scenarios that happen every day in production:

Advertisement
  • interrupted customer sessions;
  • failed 3D Secure authentication;
  • declined issuer responses;
  • expired payment links;
  • duplicate submissions;
  • network latency;
  • provider downtime;
  • webhook delivery failures.

These scenarios directly affect payment approval rates and customer trust.

Imagine a customer authorises a payment through their banking app but returns to an error page because the callback was delayed by a few seconds. From the customer’s perspective, they’ve paid. From the merchant’s perspective, the payment may remain in an unknown state until someone manually investigates it.

The same applies to mobile checkout.

European consumers increasingly complete transactions on smartphones, particularly when using digital wallets or open banking payments. Redirect flows that work perfectly on desktop can introduce unnecessary friction on mobile devices. Long loading times, poorly optimised authentication pages, and unclear error messages all contribute to lower checkout optimisation metrics.

A practical approach includes:

Advertisement
  • automated sandbox testing before every release;
  • monitoring webhook delivery and retry logic;
  • detailed payment logs for every transaction;
  • real-time alerts when approval rates fall unexpectedly;
  • clear customer-facing error messages that explain what happened and suggest the next step.

Testing should begin before launch and continue throughout the life of the integration.

Mistake 5: Overlooking fraud and security gaps

As payment technology changes, fraud tactics change with it. Criminals no longer rely solely on stolen card details. Account takeover attacks, synthetic identities, authorised push payment fraud, phishing campaigns, and increasingly sophisticated social engineering schemes are becoming more common across digital payments.

The challenge across European markets is balancing security with customer experience. Adding excessive verification to every transaction creates unnecessary friction and lowers conversion.

Higher-risk transactions should face stricter checks; routine payments should not carry the same friction.

Fraud prevention combines behavioural analysis with device fingerprinting and transaction monitoring to identify unusual activity without interrupting legitimate customers.

Advertisement

Alongside PCI DSS requirements for handling payment data, European businesses must comply with stronger cybersecurity expectations under rules such as NIS2, particularly if they provide essential digital services or operate critical infrastructure.

Strong payment fraud prevention affects approvals, chargebacks, and customer trust, so they can’t be left to the IT team alone.

UK vs EU: key payment differences

Following Brexit, the UK retained much of PSD2 but now develops payment regulation independently under the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Payment Systems Regulator (PSR). The EU, meanwhile, is moving towards PSD3 and implementing the Instant Payments Regulation.

For merchants, these differences have practical consequences.

Advertisement
EU Payments UK Payments
PSD2 moving towards PSD3 FCA-led regulatory framework
SEPA credit transfer & SEPA Instant Faster payments infrastructure
Instant euro transfers across participating countries Near real-time GBP payments through faster payments
Growing adoption of open banking across member states A more mature open banking market within one platform
Multiple currencies outside the Eurozone Primarily GBP-focused domestic integration model

[иллюстрация: оформить таблицу в фирменном стиле]

Choosing the right UK payment providers, supporting payment processing in the UK alongside payment processing in Europe, and adapting checkout experiences to local expectations generally improves approval rates and checkout conversion.

Hidden costs businesses often overlook

When businesses compare payment providers, they usually focus on transaction fees. Those fees matter, but they are rarely the largest expense.

Hidden cost Business impact
Payment declines Lost revenue and lower customer lifetime value
Checkout abandonment Reduced conversion despite stable website traffic
Manual reconciliation Higher operational costs for finance teams
Provider downtime Lost transactions during peak demand
Single-provider dependency Limited negotiating power and slower expansion
Chargebacks and fraud investigations Increased manual work and compliance costs
Slow onboarding for new markets Delayed revenue generation in new GEOs

[иллюстрация: оформить таблицу в фирменном стиле]

Advertisement

Increasing the payment approval rate by only a few percentage points can generate substantial additional revenue for businesses processing thousands of transactions each day. Reducing payment failures reduces support requests and gives customers fewer reasons to abandon the platform.

Many payment teams eventually realise that payments should be managed like any other revenue-generating function. That means continuously monitoring performance, measuring provider efficiency by market, analysing decline reasons, and refining routing strategies over time.

How payment orchestration helps

Many of these problems emerge because payment infrastructure becomes increasingly difficult to manage as businesses grow.

Adding more providers introduces additional APIs. Expanding into new countries requires new payment methods. Fraud controls become more complex. Each change may require another API connection or manual process.

Advertisement

Payment orchestration reduces the number of integrations a merchant has to manage.

Transactions can be directed dynamically
according to:
  • customer location
  • payment method
  • historical approval rates
  • issuer performance
  • provider availability
  • transaction value
  • fraud risk

[иллюстрация: оформить как “цитату”]

If one provider experiences technical issues, traffic can automatically move to another route. If approval rates decline in a specific country, routing rules can be adjusted without rebuilding the entire payment architecture.

Payment provider checklist

Before committing to a new payment partner or reviewing your existing payment setup, use the checklist below.

Advertisement
Question Why it matters
Does the provider offer
your target markets?
Make sure the provider operates in the countries where you plan to expand.
Are local payment methods available? Check whether it supports bank transfers, eWallets, or other local schemes customers use in each market.
Is the platform ready for PSD3 and future regulatory changes? Ask how the provider updates authentication, reporting, and fraud controls when regulations change.
Can transactions be routed dynamically? Ask whether routing can change by country, issuer or method.
Does the provider offer transparent reporting? Ask for detailed analytics to identify payment failures, monitor conversion, and optimise performance.
How does the provider handle fraud prevention? Look for PCI DSS compliance, risk scoring, 3DS, behavioural monitoring, and adaptive fraud controls.
Is the infrastructure flexible? Check whether new methods and markets can be added without rebuilding the existing integration.
Can the provider work
with High-Risk industries?
Businesses in iGaming, Forex, and other emerging markets require payment partners familiar with higher-risk transaction flows.

[иллюстрация: оформить таблицу в фирменном стиле либо сделать как карточки “вопрос/ответ”]

Many growing businesses now build their payment infrastructure around orchestration platforms, allowing them to manage several providers and change routing rules without redesigning the checkout.

Conclusion

Payment decisions belong in commercial planning because they determine how much acquired traffic turns into revenue.

Businesses that consistently improve payment localisation, monitor payment approval rates, build more resilient payment processing in Europe, and build a flexible payment architecture are usually better positioned to grow across both established and emerging markets.

Advertisement

The right setup should make the next market easier to launch, not add another integration the team has to maintain. Reviewing the payment setup before volumes rise is cheaper than rebuilding it after declines, support costs and provider dependencies are embedded in the business.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Business

Gianni Infantino says sorry but remains as Fifa president after executive meeting

Published

on

Fifa president Gianni Infantino is seen before the World Cup 2026 Group D match between Australia and Turkey

Gianni Infantino has apologised for “errors” he made in controversial plans to sell off stakes in competitions to private investors, but will remain Fifa president after receiving the backing of senior executives in a meeting in Morocco.

Infantino summoned members of the management board to Fifa’s Africa office in Rabat on Wednesday following mounting criticism of his aborted proposals, with world football’s governing body releasing a statement of support four hours after the meeting ended.

European football’s governing body Uefa said at the weekend that it has lost confidence in Infantino, calling the Fifa Forward Enterprise (FFE) proposal a “shabby, back room, opaque deal”.

Much criticism has come from within Fifa, including secretary general Mattias Grafstrom, who was at Wednesday’s meeting. In an internal memo sent to Fifa staff on Tuesday, he wrote that the situation is “a sad and reproachable series of events”.

Advertisement

However, in a statement following the meeting, Grafstrom and the managament board “reaffirmed their full support” for Infantino as president.

Infantino and Grafstrom also sent a signed letter – seen by the BBC – to Fifa’s vice-presidents, council and 211 member associations saying they “sincerely apologise” for their errors and “commit to them not happening again”.

The two were pictured attending a Women’s Africa Cup of Nations match together in Rabat after the meeting.

Infantino had offered all associations $40m (£30m) if they backed a proposal for private investment in its tournaments, including the men’s and women’s World Cups, through a new subsidiary, FFE.

Advertisement

Fifa said that during Wednesday’s meeting “mistakes” regarding FFE were “acknowledged”, saying it was “not the intention” for the Fifa council and members association to “feel excluded from the process and that the process should have been handled differently”.

The governing body added it “acknowledged that errors were also made after the proposal was leaked to media” – with the Times breaking the story of Infantino’s plan on 28 July.

However, the statement also said the organisation “will no longer tolerate any attacks on its integrity, good governance and due process and will take all necessary measures to protect and safeguard its name and reputation”.

Earlier, Fifa denied a story in the Times that Infantino had promised Morocco it will host the 2030 World Cup final in exchange for its support.

Advertisement

Fifa said it was a “false and misleading” claim and that a decision on where to hold the final, with the tournament also hosted by Spain and Portugal, will be made “in due course”.

Continue Reading

Business

Shorts, strappy tops, sandals: Can my boss tell me what to wear in summer?

Published

on

Three vertical photos, from left a woman wearing a white mini dress, a woman wearing an orange strappy maxi dress and men wearing shorts and shirts all walking in the street in London

Some 40% of adults considered tank tops or vest tops acceptable for women at work, compared with only 24% who said the same for men, according to Ipsos.

Natasia, a teacher in London, says at a previous school she and other staff had been summoned “regularly in the summer months to tell us off about our outfits.”

She says she was also told to cover up her tattoos. “It should be OK to have your arms out at work especially when it’s hot,” she says.

Wakeley says a well-cut camisole or strappy top can work when worn beneath a linen overshirt, lightweight jacket or tailored co-ord. On its own, however, it may feel too informal.

Advertisement

Chambers says if you’re wearing a strappy top “you must wear a strapless bra as it utterly kills an outfit when you can see bra straps”.

She explains that thicker straps are a safer option where the dress code is unclear and recommends satin camisoles as a more polished alternative to basic cotton vests.

She adds that while bandeau tops are “such an on-trend look this summer, they are a no-go for work”.

“The constant need to keep fiddling to pull them up displays an uncomfortable and unconfident demeanour,” she says.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

CAS sparks trader backlash as losses mount, Sebi holds firm

Published

on

CAS sparks trader backlash as losses mount, Sebi holds firm
Mumbai: The newly-introduced closing auction system (CAS) has drawn sharp criticism from traders, who are irked by the unpredictability of recent index and stock price moves and the resulting losses.

Calls for changes to the mechanism or, even a temporary rollback, have gathered pace on social media, prompting the Securities and Exchange Board of India and exchanges to convene a meeting with top brokers even as the authorities defended the framework.

The regulator is believed to have told brokers that it has no plans to change the CAS for now and urged them to encourage more traders to participate in the mechanism. An email sent to Sebi went unanswered till the time of going to print

At the centre of the controversy is the regulator’s decision to overhaul the way closing prices of 200-odd stocks in the futures and options (F&O) segment are determined, which traders say has caused unusually wide divergences between Sensex and Nifty and futures and options trades going awry.

Advertisement

“The biggest problem under the CAS is that traders are unable to understand what the closing prices will be because there is a lot of randomness in the system,” said Piyush Chaudhry, founder of Mumbai-based Wave Analytics.


Professional traders use factors such as order flows, liquidity, derivatives positions and historical trading patterns to estimate price directions-key to successful trading. Sharp deviations from those expectations can cause trading strategies to misfire, resulting in unexpected gains or losses.
Options traders have taken the biggest hit in the closing auction system. For traders like Aakanksha Gupta, the closing auction mechanism has put her in a blind spot as she is unable to assess where the Nifty is likely to close.”As an options seller, I rely on the live Nifty spot level to execute trades throughout the day. Since CAS was introduced, cash market trading ends at 3.15 pm , but the F&O eligible stocks continue to trade,” said Mumbai-based Gupta, a Sebi-registered research analyst. “We build strategies around the prevailing spot level, only to find the index repricing sharply when trading resumes, turning profitable positions into losses.

Both indices have witnessed rollercoaster rides in the past three days. On Wednesday, the Sensex was down 0.2% and the Nifty had fallen 0.5% at their intraday lows. At close, the Sensex ended 0.19% higher, while the Nifty closed almost flat.

“Over the past two days, we’ve seen a significant gap between the reference price during the CAS and the final indicative closing price, because large orders can influence the indicative price,” said Aditya Pachwaria, founder, Fintoric Capital.

Wild Swings

Advertisement

Shikha Pruthi Gupta, a Faridabad, NCR-based full-time trader, said a profitable trade at 3.15 pm can unexpectedly turn into a loss because of the lack of visibility into where the index will finally settle.

One key criticism voiced by traders is the 3% price band within which the auction price is generally allowed to move, measured on the basis of the stock’s average traded price between 3.00 and 3.15 pm.

“How can you have a +/- 3% range for stock prices in the auction process; that itself is a random number and has no connection to what the market’s behaviour was for the day,” said Chaudhry. “This methodology is highly questionable and has no statistical basis.”

Algorithmic trading has been among the biggest casualties of the new mechanism, with professional traders saying their models have struggled to anticipate the sharp and unexpected price moves seen over the past three days. This is because many algorithms were designed around historical closing price patterns rather than an auction-driven market close.

Advertisement

The new closing auction process lasts about 20 minutes, from 3.15 pm to around 3.35 pm. During this period, the exchange first collects buy and sell orders and then matches them to determine a single official closing price for the stock. Under the previous system, a stock’s closing price is based on the average price of trades done in the last 30 minutes, between 3 pm and 3.30 pm.

The difficulty in predicting closing prices has disrupted traders’ risk-management systems, prompting many, such as Pachwaria, Gupta and Chaudhry, to stay on the sidelines. Since many of them trade with leverage, unexpected moves near the close can magnify losses, making it harder to manage risk.

“Many traders, including me, are observing rather than trading because even algos cannot work in this environment,” said Chaudhry.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Wall Street mixed amid Iran optimism, earnings concerns

Published

on

Wall Street mixed amid Iran optimism, earnings concerns

The Dow has closed at ‌a record high on signs of progress for a peace deal with Iran while the Nasdaq registered its first decline in five sessions as SpaceX and AMD stumbled following their quarterly earnings.

Continue Reading

Business

What Residents Actually Use and What They Value Most

Published

on

What Residents Actually Use and What They Value Most

Amenity lists in apartment listings read like a competition to see who can name the most things. Rooftop lounge. Rock climbing wall. Yoga studio. Coworking space. Golf simulator. The words are there. The question that reviews answer actually is which ones get used, which ones hold up, and which ones look better in the brochure than in daily life.

Liberty Harbor packs in more amenities than most downtown Jersey City buildings. Here’s what residents really say about each one, pulled from reviews with actual details, not just vague praise.

The Fitness Center: The Most Consistently Positive Review Category

Year after year, the fitness center stands out as Liberty Harbor’s most praised amenity. Residents call out the solid range of equipment, clean space and reliable access during early mornings and midday on weekdays.

The catch: peak hours, especially 6 to 8am on weekdays and Saturday mornings, mean real wait times for cardio. If you need a specific machine at those times, expect a less ideal experience than those with flexible schedules.

Long-term residents agree: work out outside peak hours, and the fitness center is a real quality-of-life upgrade, arguably worth the rent premium. Need peak-hour access to specific equipment? Set your expectations or plan for a backup gym nearby.

Advertisement

The Pool: The Most Debated Amenity in Summer Reviews

No amenity at Liberty Harbor gets more mixed reviews than the pool. The reason is simple: it all depends on when you go.

Weekday mornings and evenings: consistently positive. The pool is accessible, the atmosphere is pleasant, and the waterfront location adds something a building’s interior pool doesn’t.

Saturday and Sunday afternoons in July and August: always crowded. If you’re banking on easy weekend pool access all summer, know this before you sign.

Here’s the reality: Liberty Harbor is big. One pool for thousands means summer weekend afternoons hit capacity. That’s not mismanagement, it’s simple math. If you use the pool early, on weekdays or off-peak weekends, your experience will be nothing like showing up at 2pm on a July Saturday.

Advertisement

The pool before work in summer is genuinely great. After noon on a July weekend, expect a different story. Know this before you move in.

The Yoga Studio and Group Fitness: Underused by Most, Valued by Those Who Use It

Residents who use the yoga studio and group fitness classes rate them highly. Those who don’t use them rarely mention them. In short, people who already value group fitness appreciate having it on-site. The rest barely notice.

Regulars say the schedule is reliable, instruction quality depends on the instructor, and the space works well. The real win is convenience. Not having to leave the building for a class makes weekday mornings easier.

The Coworking and Work-from-Home Spaces: A Sleeper Amenity

Liberty Harbor’s coworking and lounge spaces get more attention in resident reviews than in the listings. Once people find them, they call these spaces the building’s top amenity.

Advertisement

When your apartment gets noisy, or you need to focus, having a quiet, well-lit workspace downstairs beats hunting for a coffee shop or paying for coworking. Residents say the lounges are quiet, bright and have solid connectivity.

The Rock Climbing Wall: An Amenity Worth Knowing About

The rock climbing wall is one of the more unusual amenities in a residential building, and its reviews reflect that novelty. Some residents love it, many ignore it, and very few people moved to Liberty Harbor specifically because of it.

For residents who climb, or have kids who do, the wall stands out. It won’t replace a real climbing gym, but it’s a solid perk for occasional use and for families. For everyone else, it’s just part of the backdrop.

The Dog Run and Pet Amenities: Cited Frequently in Pet-Owner Reviews

Dog owners don’t mince words: the dog run and true pet-friendliness top their list of reasons to live here. The dog run is well-kept, the building actually welcomes pets, and quick access to the waterfront and Liberty State Park makes high-rise dog life far easier than most places.

Advertisement

For non-pet owners, this amenity category is invisible. For the significant portion of Liberty Harbor residents who have dogs, it’s one of the primary reasons they chose the community and have renewed.

The Outdoor Common Spaces and Events Programming: The Amenity That Shows Up Most in Retention

The fitness center gets the most praise, but it’s the outdoor programming and community events that actually keep residents around.

Outdoor movie nights and seasonal events do more than fill a calendar. They turn a building into a community. Residents meet neighbors at these gatherings in ways that never happen in the elevator or mailroom.

You won’t find this amenity on a floor plan. It takes time and a little initiative to discover. The residents who call it the best part of Liberty Harbor are usually the ones who found it early and kept coming back.

Advertisement

What to Ask About Amenities Before You Sign

A few questions worth asking during a Liberty Harbor tour that the standard amenity list doesn’t answer:

  • What are the actual peak hours for the pool and fitness center, and is there a reservation system for either?
  • How many residents is each building’s amenity suite designed to serve, and what’s the current occupancy?
  • Is there a resident events calendar I can look at for the current and upcoming months?
  • What are the coworking space hours and reservation process?

The answers to these questions will tell you whether the amenity experience will match your actual use patterns, which is what reviews are trying to tell you, and what floor plans can’t.

Liberty Harbor stands out among Jersey City waterfront communities for its amenities. Residents consistently call out the fitness center, work lounge, outdoor programming and pet facilities as highlights. The pool, though, tends to get crowded on summer weekends, so set your expectations accordingly.

In short: the amenities deliver. The outdoor community programming, while tough to capture in a listing, is a big reason people stick around.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Business

Dow Jones Climbs to Fresh Record Above 54,400 as Wall Street Rally Continues Into Wednesday This Week

Published

on

FTSE 100 Surges 0.8% Today as Oil Eases and Markets

NEW YORK — The Dow Jones Industrial Average opened Wednesday at 54,467.23, extending a remarkable run of record-setting sessions on Wall Street as falling oil prices, strong corporate earnings and growing optimism over a potential resolution to the Strait of Hormuz crisis continued to fuel investor enthusiasm.

The blue-chip index’s early Wednesday level built directly on Tuesday’s historic close, when the Dow surged 907.47 points, or 1.71%, to finish at 54,085.88, marking the index’s first close above the 54,000 threshold in its history. Wednesday’s opening level of 54,467.23 represented a further gain of roughly 381 points, or about 0.7%, from that record close, suggesting the rally that has defined trading over the past several sessions was carrying fresh momentum into the new trading day.

A Historic Week for Major Indexes

Tuesday’s session saw all three major U.S. stock benchmarks close at record highs simultaneously. The S&P 500 surged 1.79% to close at 7,736.52, its first record close in two months and a level that surpassed its previous closing peak set in early June. The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite climbed 2.59% to finish at 26,584.99, powered in part by a 29% rally in Palantir Technologies shares, though the index itself remained roughly 2% below its own record high set in early June as it continued recovering from a summer slump.

Advertisement

The Dow’s advance Tuesday marked its second consecutive all-time high, following a close above 53,000 points for just the second time ever on Monday. That back-to-back run of records came as Amazon briefly eclipsed a $3 trillion market capitalization for the first time on Monday, before pulling back roughly 2% Tuesday after founder Jeff Bezos filed to sell approximately $4 billion worth of shares.

Oil Prices and Iran Diplomacy Drive Sentiment

A significant portion of this week’s rally has been attributed to continued declines in oil prices, driven by growing hopes that diplomatic talks involving the United States, Iran and Oman could soon lead to the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz to commercial shipping traffic. Brent crude fell to $79.11 a barrel as of early Wednesday, marking a roughly 13% decline from the prior week, as officials from the three countries reported progress in negotiations aimed at resuming oil shipments through the critical waterway.

President Donald Trump reinforced that sense of momentum, saying the strait would reopen “very soon” or Iran would be “hit very hard,” according to comments reported by CNN. The optimistic tone from Washington was complicated somewhat by Iranian state media, which reported Wednesday that any potential agreement between Iran and Oman regarding the waterway’s future had “no connection” to reopening the strait itself, illustrating the continued uncertainty underlying the diplomatic process even as markets have broadly priced in an optimistic outcome. Separately, tensions in the region remained elevated after an Indian-flagged vessel was struck and sunk by a projectile off the coast of Yemen, according to Indian authorities, though no group had been identified as responsible for the attack.

Advertisement

Strong Earnings Lift Individual Stocks

Beyond the macro backdrop, Tuesday’s rally was also propelled by a wave of strong corporate earnings reports. Caterpillar led gains among Dow components, surging more than 5% and surpassing its intraday record set the previous month. Cisco Systems and IBM also posted notable gains of 5.11% and 3.91%, respectively, contributing meaningfully to the index’s advance. Beyond the Dow’s 30 components, the broader technology sector jumped roughly 4% during Tuesday’s session, with chipmakers and AI-linked companies among the standout performers as sentiment toward the sector continued to rebound from earlier summer weakness.

That sector rotation has been a defining feature of markets in recent months. Through June and July, healthcare and financial stocks, sectors in which the Dow carries significant exposure, had outperformed technology shares, helping keep the blue-chip index near record territory even as the tech-heavy Nasdaq struggled with a summer slowdown. In August, however, technology shares have staged a notable comeback, rising nearly 7% for the month even as broader debate continues among investors over which companies stand to be the ultimate winners and losers from the ongoing artificial intelligence investment boom.

A Busy Day for Earnings Ahead

Advertisement

Wednesday’s session arrived with investor attention split between the continued momentum in oil prices and Middle East diplomacy on one hand, and a fresh slate of high-profile corporate earnings on the other. Disney, Shopify and Kimberly-Clark were among the major companies scheduled to report quarterly results Wednesday, adding to an already earnings-heavy stretch of the summer reporting season that has helped drive much of the market’s recent momentum.

That earnings-driven momentum followed a similarly eventful Tuesday, when SpaceX delivered its first results as a newly public company alongside a strong quarterly report from AMD, both of which drew significant investor attention given their ties to the broader AI infrastructure buildout that has dominated market narratives for much of the year.

Caution Amid the Rally

Despite the historic run of record closes, some market strategists have cautioned that the pace of recent gains raises questions about how sustainable the rally can be in the near term, with attention turning to whether fewer individual stocks participating in new highs could signal underlying fragility even as headline indexes continue climbing. Options market positioning has generally remained bullish, according to recent market commentary, though analysts have noted that narrowing market breadth during a rally can sometimes precede periods of consolidation or pullback.

Advertisement

With Wednesday’s session already building on Tuesday’s historic close, investors are likely to continue closely tracking developments in the Strait of Hormuz negotiations, given how directly oil price movements have been tied to this week’s broader market sentiment. The continued flow of second-quarter corporate earnings, alongside any further updates on U.S.-Iran diplomacy, is expected to remain the dominant driver of trading in the sessions ahead as Wall Street works to determine whether the current record-setting run can be sustained into the latter half of the summer.

Continue Reading

Business

Walgreens store closures continue across the U.S. in 2026: reports

Published

on

Walgreens store closures continue across the U.S. in 2026: reports

Walgreens is continuing to close underperforming stores in 2026, although the pharmacy chain is reportedly planning fewer closures than previously projected.

The company is expected to close fewer than 100 stores in 2026, down from earlier internal projections of roughly 700, Inc. reported.

Advertisement

Walgreens announced in October 2024 that it intended to shutter approximately 1,200 underperforming stores over three years as part of a broader turnaround effort. 

At the time, the company said it expected to close about 500 stores during fiscal 2025, primarily targeting locations that were generating negative cash flow, according to Reuters.

WALGREENS TO CLOSE CHICAGO STORE AFTER LOSING OVER $1M DUE TO RAMPANT THEFT, FALLING SALES

A view of a Walgreens store

A Walgreens store March 6, 2025, in Mill Valley, Calif. Walgreens is reportedly continuing to close underperforming stores in 2026. (Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

The closure strategy was reportedly scaled back after Walgreens went private in 2025, according to Inc.

Advertisement

Walgreens continues to operate thousands of stores across the U.S. and remains one of the country’s largest pharmacy chains.

CVS OFFERS NEW PHARMACY OPTION FOR PET OWNERS

People shop at a Walgreens

People shop at a Walgreens Nov. 6, 2025, in the Brooklyn borough of New York City. Walgreens announced in October 2024 that it intended to shutter approximately 1,200 underperforming stores. (Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

The company confirmed to USA Today that the following locations have recently closed or are scheduled to close. The closures were previously reported by Inc., local news outlets or Walgreens’ website:

  • District of Columbia: One Washington location
  • Illinois: Two Chicago stores and one Rockford location
  • Missouri: One store in Bridgeton and another in St. Louis
  • New Jersey: One Bogota location scheduled to close Aug. 6
  • New York: One Brooklyn location
  • South Carolina: One Beaufort location scheduled to close Aug. 6
  • Texas: A Houston distribution center
  • Virginia: One Arlington location
  • Washington: One Seattle location
  • Wisconsin: One Milwaukee store

One of the Chicago closures highlights the financial and operational pressures behind some of the company’s decisions.

CVS, WALGREENS PULL BACK COVID VACCINES IN MORE THAN A DOZEN STATES FOLLOWING NEW GUIDELINES

Advertisement
Pedestrians pass in front of a Walgreens store

Walgreens continues to operate thousands of stores across the U.S. (Christopher Dilts/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Walgreens announced earlier this year it was closing its location near 86th Street and Cottage Grove Avenue in Chicago’s Chatham neighborhood after the location struggled with declining prescription sales and elevated levels of theft.

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

“I’m here today because we’re closing the store at 86th and Cottage Grove. But I just want to make sure everyone understands closing stores [is] not our goal. This is the last resort,” Walgreens regional Vice President Reginald Johnson said in May, according to FOX 32 Chicago.

Walgreens could not immediately be reached by FOX Business for comment.

Advertisement

FOX Business’ Eric Revell contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

Business

Nikita Bier steps down as X product chief after one year

Published

on


Nikita Bier steps down as X product chief after one year

Continue Reading

Business

What’s causing record high US beef prices?

Published

on

Cattle standing in a dried out field in Texas

A meatpacker is the plant that slaughters the animal and breaks the carcass down into the cuts that reach shops or restaurants.

Four companies – Tyson, JBS, Cargill and National Beef – control around 85% of American beef processing.

That high level of market concentration has drawn accusations of price-fixing, even from President Trump.

So you might expect that those four firms are currently making huge profits from high beef prices. Yet the opposite is happening.

Advertisement

Tyson, the biggest of the four, reported in May that it had lost more than $500m, external on beef in the first half of its financial year.

Again, it might be selling its beef for record highs, but it is also buying the cattle at all-time peaks.

Jamie Crumley owns one of the remaining smaller meatpackers – Harpley’s Meatpacking in central North Carolina. She says the price companies like hers have to pay for the live animals has gone up by as much as 60% over the past three years.

And while meatpacking companies have increased the prices they charge for their beef, there is a limit. This is because supermarkets, restaurants – and US consumers – can, and will, simply switch to buying chicken or cheaper imported beef instead.

Advertisement

Then there is the inefficiency of running the meatpacking plants at much less than full capacity. For example, Harpley’s is built to handle 425 to 450 cattle a day. But it is currently running at just 350 because it cannot get the additional animals.

The building, the line and the staff cost the same either way, so those fixed costs now spread across fewer animals. On any given day Crumley says she can lose anywhere from $100 to $400 on a single head of cattle. This helps to explain Tyson’s giant losses.

Continue Reading

Business

BeOne Medicines DRC earnings beat by $2.29, revenue topped estimates

Published

on


BeOne Medicines DRC earnings beat by $2.29, revenue topped estimates

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025