The company posted a consolidated net profit of Rs 413 crore for the quarter ended March 2026, marking a 45% year-on-year (YoY) increase from Rs 281 crore reported in the corresponding quarter last year.

Revenue from operations rose 52% YoY to Rs 2,594 crore from Rs 1,705 crore in the March quarter of FY25.

Reflecting the earnings growth, earnings per share (EPS) increased to Rs 11.69 from Rs 8.02 in the year-ago period.

For the full financial year FY26, Aegis Logistics reported a consolidated net profit of Rs 901 crore, up 36% from Rs 663 crore in FY25.

Live Events

Annual revenue from operations rose 23% to Rs 8,333 crore, compared with Rs 6,763 crore in the previous fiscal year, highlighting sustained business growth across segments.

Dividend Reward for Shareholders

Adding to investor optimism, the board of directors recommended a final dividend of Rs 6.70 per share (670% on the face value of Re 1 per share) for FY26. The proposal is subject to shareholder approval at the company’s upcoming 69th Annual General Meeting (AGM).
Also read: PSU bank stocks vs private banks in FY27: The valuation trap you need to avoid

Stock Performance and Technical Outlook

Aegis Logistics has been a notable wealth creator for long-term investors. The stock has delivered a return of approximately 107% over the past three years, more than doubling investor wealth.The stock’s 52-week high stands at Rs 944.60, while its 52-week low is Rs 576.10.

On the technical front, the Relative Strength Index (RSI-14) stands at 63, indicating the stock is neither overbought nor oversold. Typically, an RSI reading above 70 signals overbought conditions, while a reading below 30 indicates oversold territory. The stock is trading above all eight of its key Simple Moving Averages (SMAs), reflecting a strong bullish trend.

Also read: Wockhardt shares rocket 19% after FDA approval for antibiotic targeting drug-resistant infections

Foreign Institutional Investors (FIIs), their stake rose from 17.87% to 19.56% during the March 2026 quarter. Mutual funds, however, reduced their holdings from 5.08% to 3.36% over the same period.

(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)