Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Business

AI Foundry Push Contrasts With IBM’s Quantum and Software Stability

Published

on

SpaceX Falcon 9 Successfully Launches 25 Starlink Satellites from California

NEW YORK — Intel Corp. and International Business Machines Corp. showed contrasting performances through mid-2026 as investors compared Intel’s semiconductor recovery efforts against IBM’s steady software, infrastructure and quantum computing progress.

As of May 22, 2026, Intel shares closed at $118.50. IBM shares closed at $252.97.

Intel reported first-quarter 2026 revenue of $13.6 billion, up 7% year-over-year. The Data Center and AI segment grew 22% to $5.1 billion. The company posted a GAAP net loss of $3.7 billion, or $0.73 per share, due to restructuring charges. Non-GAAP earnings per share were $0.29.

Intel guided second-quarter 2026 revenue between $13.8 billion and $14.8 billion. The company highlighted progress on its 18A process and AI CPU sales.

Advertisement

IBM posted first-quarter 2026 revenue of $15.9 billion, up 9% year-over-year, or 6% at constant currency. Software revenue reached $7.05 billion, up 11%. Infrastructure revenue increased 15% to $3.33 billion. Consulting revenue grew 4% to $5.27 billion.

IBM reported GAAP net income of $1.2 billion, or $1.28 per share. Operating non-GAAP earnings per share were $1.91. Free cash flow reached $2.2 billion. The company reiterated full-year 2026 expectations for more than 5% revenue growth at constant currency.

Valuation and Analyst Consensus

Analysts assigned Intel a consensus Hold rating with average price targets in the $70 to $81 range in some reports, though recent momentum pushed shares higher. Intel shares showed strong recovery from 2025 lows.

Advertisement

IBM carried a Moderate Buy consensus with an average 12-month price target near $294, suggesting potential upside. Some targets reached $360.

IBM showed higher revenue, earnings and net margins than Intel in the most recent quarter. IBM’s net margin was 15.61% compared to Intel’s negative figures in the period.

Business Strategies

Intel focused on regaining AI server share and advancing its foundry business under CEO Lip-Bu Tan. The company reported sold-out AI CPU capacity and explored partnerships, including with Tenstorrent. Challenges persisted in foundry profitability.

Advertisement

IBM emphasized hybrid cloud, Watsonx AI tools and quantum computing. The company announced plans for a U.S. quantum chip foundry and reported strong mainframe performance with the z17 model. Software and infrastructure drove growth.

Financial Metrics

Intel’s stock exhibited high volatility with a significant rebound in 2026. Operating cash flow in Q1 was $1.1 billion, with adjusted free cash flow negative due to capital expenditures.

IBM maintained stable financials with consistent profitability. Operating gross profit margin reached 57.7% in Q1 2026, up 110 basis points year-over-year.

Advertisement

Dividend and Returns

Both companies maintained dividends. IBM offered a yield around 3% with a history of consistent payments. Intel’s dividend faced scrutiny amid earlier losses but continued.

Risks and Outlook

Intel projected sequential revenue growth in client and data center segments for Q2, driven by supply and pricing. Risks included foundry execution and AI chip competition.

Advertisement

IBM projected continued software acceleration and free cash flow growth. Risks involved consulting execution and broader AI commercialization timelines.

Intel showed higher cyclical exposure compared to IBM’s enterprise focus. Stock movements in 2026 reflected these differences, with Intel displaying sharper rebounds.

Upcoming earnings include Intel in late July 2026 and IBM around July 22, 2026. Supply chain developments, AI adoption and quantum initiatives will influence both stocks through the remainder of 2026.

This comparison draws from company reports, analyst consensus and market data available through May 23, 2026. Investment decisions require individual assessment and professional advice. Actual results may vary based on economic conditions and execution.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Business

Axon: The SaaSpocalypse Selloff Is The Opportunity

Published

on

Axon: The SaaSpocalypse Selloff Is The Opportunity

Axon: The SaaSpocalypse Selloff Is The Opportunity

Continue Reading

Business

InvestingPro Fair Value spotted Hecla Mining’s 45% drop in advance

Published

on


InvestingPro Fair Value spotted Hecla Mining’s 45% drop in advance

Continue Reading

Business

(VIDEO) Thunder Overcome 15-Point Deficit to Beat Spurs 123-108 in Game 3 of 2026 Western Finals

Published

on

Shai Gilgeous-Alexander Repeats as NBA MVP, Leads Thunder to Top

SAN ANTONIO — The Oklahoma City Thunder rallied from a 15-point first-quarter deficit to defeat the San Antonio Spurs 123-108 on May 22, 2026, at Frost Bank Center and take a 2-1 lead in the Western Conference Finals.

The Thunder outscored the Spurs 97-77 after the opening period. Oklahoma City’s bench produced 76 points, a standout contribution in the victory.

Shai Gilgeous-Alexander led the Thunder with 26 points and 12 assists. Jared McCain scored 24 points off the bench, and Jaylin Williams added 18 points, including five three-pointers.

Advertisement

Victor Wembanyama paced the Spurs with 26 points. The Spurs’ bench managed only 23 points in the contest.

Game Flow and Key Runs

The Spurs jumped to an early 15-point lead in the first quarter. The Thunder responded with strong play in the second and third quarters, outscoring San Antonio 69-53 in those periods.

Oklahoma City controlled the tempo after the slow start, leveraging depth and defensive pressure. The Thunder shot efficiently and forced turnovers that led to transition opportunities.

Advertisement

Injury Context

Jalen Williams missed the game for the Thunder due to a right hamstring strain. For the Spurs, De’Aaron Fox and Dylan Harper were both questionable entering the contest with ankle and adductor issues, respectively. Their availability impacted San Antonio’s backcourt depth.

The Spurs relied on Victor Wembanyama and supporting cast members amid the guard injuries. Harrison Barnes and Jordan McLaughlin saw increased minutes in the backcourt rotation.

Series Background

Advertisement

The series opened with the Spurs winning Game 1 in double overtime 122-115 in Oklahoma City, powered by Wembanyama’s 41 points and 24 rebounds along with Harper’s 24 points, 11 rebounds, six assists and seven steals.

In Game 2 on May 20, the Thunder responded with a 122-113 home victory behind Gilgeous-Alexander’s 30 points and nine assists. Harper left that game in the third quarter with the adductor injury.

Statistical Breakdown

The Thunder finished with balanced scoring contributions. Their bench dominance proved decisive, with multiple reserves reaching double figures. Oklahoma City improved to 2-1 in the series with the road win.

Advertisement

San Antonio shot well in stretches but struggled to sustain momentum. The Spurs’ second-half output could not match the Thunder’s depth. Rebounding and assist numbers favored Oklahoma City in key statistical categories.

Notable Performances

Gilgeous-Alexander orchestrated the offense efficiently despite early defensive attention. McCain’s scoring outburst provided a major spark for the visitors. Williams’ three-point shooting stretched the floor.

For the Spurs, Wembanyama delivered another strong outing but received limited consistent support from the perimeter. The team’s guard absences limited ball movement and creation at times.

Advertisement

Coaching and Strategy

Thunder coach Mark Daigneault utilized deep rotations to maintain pressure. The strategy of wearing down the Spurs through bench waves proved effective over the 48 minutes.

Spurs coach Mitch Johnson managed limited guard options and leaned heavily on Wembanyama in the paint. Adjustments in the second half focused on cutting into the deficit but came up short.

Home-Court Atmosphere

Advertisement

The game marked the first Western Conference Finals contest at Frost Bank Center in 2026. Legends David Robinson and Tim Duncan attended the matchup. The crowd provided vocal support early but witnessed the Thunder’s comeback.

Broader Playoff Implications

The victory gave Oklahoma City the series lead for the first time. Historical data indicates teams winning Game 3 to take a 2-1 lead in such series advance at a high rate. Game 4 is scheduled for Sunday, May 24, in San Antonio.

The Thunder, as defending champions, have shown resilience through injuries. The Spurs have demonstrated competitiveness in the postseason despite health challenges to key guards.

Advertisement

Upcoming Schedule

Game 4 remains in San Antonio. The series could return to Oklahoma City for Game 5 if necessary. Both teams will monitor injury recoveries closely heading into the next contest.

Full game highlights circulated widely on platforms following the final buzzer, showcasing the Thunder’s bench scoring runs and key defensive stops. The 123-108 margin reflected Oklahoma City’s control after the initial Spurs surge.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

First Advantage stock soars 72% after InvestingPro Fair Value signal

Published

on


First Advantage stock soars 72% after InvestingPro Fair Value signal

Continue Reading

Business

NYT Strands Answers May 23 2026 Revealed for Puzzle No. 811 Theme Staying Alive

Published

on

NYT Strands

NEW YORK — The New York Times Strands puzzle for May 23, 2026, numbered 811, had the theme “Staying alive” with the spangram SURVIVALIST, according to official solutions and review sites.

The six theme words were MACHETE, HATCHET, FLINT, PARACORD, TARP and SHOVEL. These items represent essential equipment for enduring the great outdoors and wilderness survival situations.

The spangram SURVIVALIST describes a person exceptionally prepared or skilled at staying alive in the wilderness using minimal resources. It typically spans the grid from one side to the other.

Puzzle Details and Solving Path

Advertisement

Strands presents a 6×8 grid of letters where players connect adjacent letters horizontally, vertically or diagonally to form words. The game includes one spangram that captures the overarching theme and several additional theme words. Non-theme words can be submitted for hints after finding three.

Many solvers identified SURVIVALIST early, which unlocked the remaining words related to survival gear. MACHETE and HATCHET provided cutting tools, while FLINT referred to fire-starting material. PARACORD served as versatile rope, TARP as shelter material and SHOVEL for digging or utility.

The puzzle reset at midnight local time. Players who submitted non-theme words received progressive hints, including the first three letters of remaining words: FLI for FLINT, HAT for HATCHET, MAC for MACHETE, PAR for PARACORD, SHO for SHOVEL and TAR for TARP.

Previous Day Comparison

Advertisement

The May 22, 2026, puzzle No. 810 featured the theme related to large scale with the spangram ITSBIG and words including ASTRONOMIC, BOUNDLESS, EPIC, IMMENSE, VAST and WHOPPING.

Game Mechanics

Strands is part of The New York Times Games portfolio alongside Wordle, Connections and others. Players must use each letter exactly once across all valid words. The spangram is highlighted in yellow upon discovery, while theme words appear in blue. A perfect solve shows a specific pattern of indicators.

The May 23 edition fell on a Saturday. Community feedback noted the outdoor survival theme resonated with players familiar with camping, hiking and emergency preparedness. The words focused on rugged tools and gear used in wild or emergency situations.

Advertisement

Strategies Reported by Solvers

Common starting approaches included scanning for longer words or obvious compounds like PARACORD. Many began in corners or looked for tool-related terms after recognizing the survival theme. Finding the spangram first often simplified the remaining grid.

The New York Times publishes a Sidekick companion with hints. For puzzle 811, it encouraged thinking about practical endurance and wilderness preparation items typically packed in emergency kits or bug-out bags.

Popularity and Context

Advertisement

Strands has maintained steady engagement since its expansion in the NYT Games lineup. The daily format encourages vocabulary, pattern recognition and lateral thinking. Saturday puzzles sometimes incorporate practical or adventure-related themes like the May 23 edition.

On May 23, 2026, the puzzle aligned with other NYT games: Wordle answer CHUCK and Connections categories including hairdos, more readily, Marvel characters and Star Wars movie title elements.

Broader NYT Games Ecosystem

The New York Times offers Strands through its website and mobile app. Basic daily play is free, with subscriptions providing archives and additional features. The game requires finding all theme words and the spangram to complete the board fully.

Advertisement

No major rule changes were reported for Strands in 2026. The format continues to blend word search and crossword elements, with the spangram providing the thematic anchor. Difficulty varies by grid arrangement and word familiarity.

Community Engagement

Solvers shared results on social platforms using indicator grids that avoid full spoilers. Discussions highlighted the utility-focused vocabulary in the May 23 puzzle. Some noted connections to real-world survival skills and outdoor activities.

Performance tracking includes solve times, hint usage and perfect completion rates. The purple-level challenge in related games like Connections often draws comparisons to Strands’ spangram difficulty.

Advertisement

Historical Notes

Strands builds on the success of other NYT word games launched or acquired in recent years. Puzzle numbering reached the 800s by mid-2026, reflecting consistent daily output. Each edition adds to an archive of thematic challenges.

The May 23 solution emphasized single-word items with specific manual functions in primitive or outdoor technology contexts. Official answers are confirmed directly from The New York Times sources after the daily reset.

Players who missed the May 23 puzzle can reference solution archives. The game continues to attract participants seeking a balance of accessibility and intellectual challenge through its letter grid format.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Nvidia says its forecast for $200 billion CPU market includes China

Published

on

Nvidia says its forecast for $200 billion CPU market includes China


Nvidia says its forecast for $200 billion CPU market includes China

Continue Reading

Business

Vedanta, MCX, among 10 stocks that saw highest increase in retail shareholding in Q4. Do you own any? – Retail Rise

Published

on

Vedanta, MCX, among 10 stocks that saw highest increase in retail shareholding in Q4. Do you own any? - Retail Rise

Multi Commodity Exchange of India saw retail holding value rise by Rs 602 crore during the quarter. Retail investors held Rs 8,835 crore worth of shares at the end of March 2026 versus Rs 8,233 crore in December 2025, while the stock gained 7.31%.

(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)

Continue Reading

Business

McDonald’s SWOT analysis: stock navigates value wars and growth

Published

on


McDonald’s SWOT analysis: stock navigates value wars and growth

Continue Reading

Business

NYT Connections Sports Edition Answers May 23 2026 Revealed for Puzzle No. 613

Published

on

Ryan Cohen

NEW YORK — The New York Times Connections Sports Edition puzzle for May 23, 2026, numbered 613, featured four sports-themed categories with the following groupings according to official solutions published by review sites.

The yellow category, rated easiest, was “defeat soundly.” The words were CRUSH, PASTE, ROUT and SHELLAC.

The green category was “a Missouri athlete.” The words were BLUE, CHIEF, ROYAL and CARDINAL.

The blue category was “college coaches.” The words were CIGNETTI, DAY, FICKELL and RHULE.

Advertisement

The purple category was “baseball terms or names.” The words were BASE, CUT, FINISH and MENDOZA.

The 16 words in the grid were PASTE, CUT, FINISH, DAY, CHIEF, CIGNETTI, MENDOZA, ROUT, FICKELL, BASE, ROYAL, BLUE, RHULE, SHELLAC, CARDINAL and CRUSH.

Game Mechanics

Connections Sports Edition follows the standard Connections format but focuses exclusively on sports-related themes. Players sort 16 words into four groups of four based on common threads. The game provides color-coded feedback: yellow for the easiest category, green for the next, blue for the third and purple for the hardest.

Advertisement

The May 23, 2026, edition emphasized college football coaches, MLB team nicknames associated with Missouri, ways to describe a decisive victory in sports and baseball-specific terminology. Solvers noted the Missouri athlete category linked to Kansas City sports teams and the St. Louis Cardinals.

Previous Day Comparison

The May 22, 2026, Connections Sports Edition puzzle No. 612 included these categories: attributes for a baseball pitcher with CONTROL, COMMAND, VELOCITY and STAMINA; NHL teams familiarly with HABS, AVS, CANES and ISLES; can follow the word “Texas” with RANGERS, LONGHORNS, TECH and LEAGUER; and members of the Cincinnati Reds with SINGER, STEER, DE LA CRUZ and BURNS.

Solving Strategies

Advertisement

Many players started with obvious sports victory terms such as CRUSH and ROUT, which quickly unlocked the yellow category. The Missouri athlete group connected through professional sports franchises in the state. College coaches required knowledge of current NCAA football head coaches.

The purple category proved most challenging for some, linking baseball concepts including base, cut, finish and Mendoza, the latter referring to the Mendoza Line in baseball statistics.

Popularity of Sports Edition

Connections Sports Edition, launched as a beta version by The New York Times and The Athletic, has gained a dedicated following among sports fans. The daily puzzle complements the standard Connections game and attracts players interested in athletics, coaching names, team nicknames and sports terminology.

Advertisement

On May 23, 2026, the puzzle coincided with ongoing NBA Western Conference Finals coverage between the Oklahoma City Thunder and San Antonio Spurs, adding relevance for basketball fans following playoff action.

Companion Resources

The New York Times and partner sites provide hints and companion articles for each puzzle. For No. 613, progressive hints included sports victory synonyms and Missouri sports references. Third-party solvers offered practice boards and reveal assistants.

Broader NYT Games Context

Advertisement

The Sports Edition runs alongside regular Connections, which on May 23, 2026, had categories for hairdos, more readily, Marvel characters and Star Wars movie title words. Other games that day included Wordle with answer CHUCK and Strands with survival theme.

Players access the puzzle through The Athletic or New York Times platforms. Basic play is available daily, with subscriptions offering additional features and archives. The sports version maintains the same four-mistake limit before the puzzle ends.

Community Response

Solvers discussed the puzzle on forums, noting the college coaches category required familiarity with current NCAA leadership. The Missouri athlete group stood out for fans of Kansas City Chiefs, Royals and St. Louis Cardinals. Discussions highlighted how the puzzle tested knowledge across multiple sports.

Advertisement

Performance metrics shared by users included perfect solve rates and time to completion. Saturday puzzles often feature a mix of timely and evergreen sports topics.

Historical Development

Connections Sports Edition expanded The New York Times’ games portfolio in recent years. By mid-2026, puzzle numbering reached the 600s, indicating regular daily releases. Each edition draws from diverse sports including football, baseball, hockey and basketball.

The May 23 solution blended current coaching names with classic sports terminology, typical of the game’s educational and entertaining balance. Official answers are confirmed post-reset by The New York Times.

Advertisement

Tips for Players

Effective strategies include grouping obvious sports terms first and eliminating confirmed categories. Knowledge of major league team nicknames, prominent coaches and statistical terms aids solving. New players can use practice modes on helper sites.

The game encourages engagement with sports culture while building pattern recognition skills. Difficulty varies, with purple categories often requiring deeper sports knowledge.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

YouTuber Finds 750-Year-Old Bone While Searching for Nancy Guthrie Near Tucson

Published

on

Savannah Guthrie & Nancy Guthrie

TUCSON, Ariz. — A YouTuber searching for missing 84-year-old Nancy Guthrie discovered a human bone in a dry riverbed near Tucson on May 7, 2026, but authorities later determined the remains date back approximately 750 years and are unrelated to her February abduction.

AJ Wysopal, a 38-year-old Tucson resident, was live streaming his search a few miles from Guthrie’s home in the Catalina Foothills area when he spotted the bone protruding from the dirt in a wash near North Craycroft Road and East River Road.

“I’m pretty sure that’s a bone,” Wysopal said on his livestream. “What the heck?”

Wysopal poked at the object with a hiking stick, attempted to dig around it and then contacted 911. Viewers on the stream reacted with comments including “BODY” and expressions of shock.

Advertisement

Investigation and Determination

Pima County authorities responded to the scene. The Pima County medical examiner’s office determined the bone was too old to relate to a recent death. James Watson, curator of bioarchaeology at the Arizona State Museum, inspected the remains and confirmed they belonged to a member of the Hohokam people, an ancient group considered ancestors to modern Native Americans in Arizona.

Tucson police stated the discovery was not part of a crime scene. The find shifted from a potential lead in the high-profile Guthrie case to an archaeological matter.

The location was about seven miles from Guthrie’s residence. Nancy Guthrie, mother of “Today” show co-anchor Savannah Guthrie, was abducted from her home on Feb. 1, 2026. Investigators believe she was taken in the early morning hours.

Advertisement

Context of the Guthrie Case

As of May 2026, the search for Nancy Guthrie had entered its fourth month with no arrests and no confirmed suspect. The family offered a substantial reward for information leading to her recovery. The case drew national attention and prompted civilian searches, including those by Wysopal and other YouTubers.

Wysopal began his YouTube channel after Guthrie’s disappearance and conducted multiple searches in the area. The May 7 incident marked one of several civilian efforts that generated public interest and sometimes false hopes.

Archaeological Significance

Advertisement

The bone is believed to be from the Hohokam culture, which inhabited the region from approximately 300 to 1500 A.D. Experts noted such discoveries are not uncommon in southern Arizona due to the area’s rich prehistoric history. The remains will likely be handled according to protocols for ancient Native American artifacts.

Watson has fielded questions about the case and emphasized the importance of proper reporting of archaeological finds to avoid disturbing cultural sites.

Public and Media Reaction

The livestream drew significant viewership, with thousands watching in real time as police arrived. Initial speculation linked the bone to Guthrie, but officials quickly clarified its age. Media outlets covered the discovery and subsequent determination extensively.

Advertisement

The incident highlighted challenges in high-profile missing persons cases where public involvement can yield both useful tips and unrelated findings. Law enforcement has received tens of thousands of tips since February.

Ongoing Search Efforts

Civilian searchers continue to assist in areas around Tucson. The Pima County Sheriff’s Department and FBI remain involved in the Guthrie investigation. As of mid-May 2026, authorities had not identified new major breakthroughs.

Savannah Guthrie and the family have cooperated with investigators while appealing for public information. The case has involved doorbell camera footage, vehicle tracking and multiple search warrants.

Advertisement

Broader Implications

Discoveries like the ancient bone underscore the need for caution when evaluating potential evidence in missing persons investigations. Officials have urged the public to report findings to authorities rather than disturb scenes.

The Hohokam connection adds a layer of historical context to the area’s landscape. Southern Arizona contains numerous archaeological sites, and modern development sometimes uncovers such remains.

Wysopal cooperated fully with detectives on scene, providing details of his search route and livestream footage. His channel focused on boots-on-the-ground efforts in the Guthrie case.

Advertisement

Timeline of Events

  • Feb. 1, 2026: Nancy Guthrie abducted from her Tucson-area home.
  • May 7, 2026: Wysopal discovers bone during livestreamed search.
  • May 8 onward: Medical examiner and archaeologists determine age and origin.
  • May 22, 2026: Public confirmation that the bone is prehistoric and unrelated.

The Guthrie investigation continues with active leads. The ancient bone discovery, while notable, closed one chapter of speculation without advancing the case. Law enforcement continues to process tips and evidence as the search enters its fourth month.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025