Business
America’s retreat is increasing China’s control of global EV markets
A large number of new energy vehicles for export park at a car terminal on the Hangzhou section of the Beijing-Hangzhou Grand Canal in Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China, on June 2, 2025.
Costfoto | Nurphoto | Getty Images
DETROIT — The unraveling of the U.S. electric vehicle push is increasingly raising concerns of an existential crisis for the American auto industry, as Chinese carmakers surge ahead in the technologies that many still believe will define the next era of cars.
The latest warning sign came Friday, when Stellantis disclosed a $26 billion charge from a major business overhaul, including a pullback in EVs, triggering a more than 20% plunge in its stock. CEO Antonio Filosa blamed the hit on overestimating the pace of the energy transition.
It follows other automakers in the U.S. significantly pulling back from pure EVs in favor of large gas-guzzling trucks such as the Ford F-150 and SUVs like the Chevrolet Suburban. Chinese automakers are taking the opposite approach and are growing globally, led by EVs.
Legacy automakers General Motors and Ford Motor have lost billions of dollars on EVs and are pulling back partly because of the loss of a federal tax credit and lackluster consumer demand.
Even Tesla, which pioneered the EV industry, is facing pressure. It was surpassed by Chinese automaker BYD in EV sales as the Elon Musk-led brand lost its appeal and market share in Europe this year, while BYD ramped up exports there and around the world. Tesla also last week canceled its two oldest, lowest-selling electric vehicles to repurpose an American plant for humanoid robots.
After helming the electrification movement for years, Musk increasingly appears focused elsewhere, especially on robots, driverless taxis and his artificial intelligence company, which he combined with Space X in what was the biggest merger in history.
Meanwhile, global market share of Chinese brands has jumped nearly 70% in five years, and many experts see a threat to U.S. automakers, including the anticipated entrance of Chinese brands into America.
There’s fear among global automakers that Chinese rivals like BYD and Geely could flood global markets, undercutting domestic production and vehicle prices. The U.S. has taken a protectionist approach by implementing 100% tariffs on imported EVs from China, but Chinese automakers have made inroads across Europe, South America and elsewhere.
Companies in the U.S., where the automotive industry represents about 5% of the country’s gross domestic product, are worried about long-term implications.
“The Chinese auto industry presents an existential threat to the traditional [automakers],” said Terry Woychowski, a former GM executive who serves as president of automotive at engineering consulting firm Caresoft Global.
Several automotive experts used the word “existential” when discussing the growth of Chinese automakers.
“The existential risk to the U.S. auto industry isn’t Chinese EVs alone, it’s the combination of sustained government support, vertically integrated supply chains and speed,” said Elizabeth Krear, Center for Automotive Research CEO. “Those advantages lower costs and accelerate execution. Concurrently, saturation in China’s domestic market is driving automakers to expand aggressively into global markets.”
China’s growth
The Chinese automotive sector has rapidly changed from an insular industry to the largest exporter of vehicles globally since 2023.
China’s growth has been fueled by government funding for companies as well as a culture of innovation and speed the country has instilled in its workers, experts said. A slowing Chinese market and plant underutilization have also forced companies to begin exporting to major auto markets globally.
China’s expansion of EVs has been particularly impressive, with a nearly 800% increase globally, largely fueled by sales in China growing from roughly 572,300 in 2020 to 4.95 million in 2025, according to GlobalData. Outside of China, EV sales have increased by more than 1,300%, from less than 33,000 to more than 474,000, per the firm.
While China has grown, Detroit’s “Big Three” automakers — GM, Ford and Chrysler parent Stellantis, which is no longer based in the U.S. — have collectively fallen from a global market share of 21.4% in 2019 to an estimated 15.7% in 2025, according to S&P Global Mobility.
That compares to China’s largest automakers BYD and Geely, which have grown from a less than 3% market share to an estimated 11.1%, according to S&P Global Mobility.
HONG KONG, CHINA – JANUARY 05: A general view of the BYD Auto showroom on January 5, 2026, in Hong Kong, China. (Photo by Sawayasu Tsuji/Getty Images)
Sawayasu Tsuji | Getty Images News | Getty Images
China’s most recent announced expansion is to Canada, a relatively small vehicle market that removed 100% tariffs on imported vehicles from China amid a trade dispute with the Trump administration.
That follows the rapid growth of Chinese automakers in lower-income, less established regions that have historically been growth markets for U.S. automakers, such as South America, India, and Mexico. They’re also making inroads in Europe, where the share of sales has risen from virtually nothing in 2020 to nearly 10% in December, according to Germany-based Dataforce.
“The shift to electric has made it easier for them, because they’ve got the right products,” said Al Bedwell, U.K.-based expert and director of global automotive powertrain for GlobalData. “The fact that it is electric has really opened the doors, and it wouldn’t have happened otherwise.”
Bedwell said China wanted to wean itself off oil since it doesn’t have vast amounts on its own. “It saw an opportunity to be a leader,” he added.
GlobalData forecasts Chinese EVs will continue to grow globally to roughly 6.5 million units by 2030, followed by nearly 8.5 million in 2035. That includes continued growth in the U.S., where a few China-made vehicles such as the Buick Envision have been imported in recent years.
“Breaking into the U.S. market successfully and sustainably is not an easy accomplishment; it takes time, investment, patience and the willingness to make product mistakes but improve them until you get it right. It is expected that some Chinese automakers will have that blend and eventually look to participate in the U.S. market,” said Stephanie Brinley, a principal automotive analyst at S&P Global Mobility.
Brinley noted it took Japan’s Toyota Motor from 1957 to 2001 to reach a 10% market share, while South Korea’s Hyundai Motor reached 10% after 26 years in 2022.
US President Donald Trump speaks alongside Ford executive chairman Bill Ford as he tours Ford Motor Company’s River Rouge complex in Dearborn, Michigan, on January 13, 2026.
Mandel Ngan | Afp | Getty Images
“Because the U.S. is a mature market and sales are forecast to remain between 16 million and 16.5 million units through at least 2035, newcomers will take share from existing brands and automakers,” Brinley said. “How quickly they connect with consumers and which automakers lose volume or share to the new competitor remains to be seen.”
The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, a lobbying group representing nearly every automaker in the U.S., wants to prevent that from happening. It called on Congress and the Trump administration in December to prevent Chinese government-backed auto and advanced battery manufacturers from gaining entry to manufacture in the U.S.
“Automakers doing business inside the United States face geopolitical and market pressures from China that are a direct threat to America’s global competitiveness and national security,” John Bozzella, CEO of the alliance, said in a message to a U.S. House of Representatives select committee, citing unfair, anticompetitive trade practices and intellectual property theft.
State of U.S. EV industry
U.S. automakers spent billions of dollars developing and launching EVs under regulations and incentives from the Biden administration that have largely been undone by the Trump administration.
That deregulation opened the doors for automakers to deemphasize all-electric vehicle plans.
GM and Ford alone have announced more than $27 billion in write-downs recently due to their retreat on EVs, including canceling new models and lowering production of current ones.
Jeep-maker Stellantis on Friday announced a 22-billion-euro ($26 billion) hit from a business turnaround plan that includes pulling back on electrification plans and reintroducing V8 engines to U.S. models.
U.S. EV sales peaked in September, ahead of the federal incentives ending, at 10.3% of the new vehicle market, according to Cox Automotive. That demand plummeted to preliminary estimates of 5.2% during the fourth quarter.
GM CFO Paul Jacobson said Wednesday that the Detroit automaker, which has largely become a regional player in North America, isn’t abandoning EVs but is right-sizing to natural demand instead of attempting to appease regulators.
When asked about the expansion of Chinese automakers, Jacobson said GM “can hold our own” but that it needs to be on a level playing field — rehashing that he thinks U.S. tariffs should work to offset subsidies Chinese companies get from the Chinese government.
“You can see the type of intensity and competitiveness that those vehicles bring to the marketplace. And therefore, we’ve got to be ready,” he said during a Chicago Federal Reserve automotive conference in Detroit.
GM wasn’t ready for the rise of the domestic auto industry in China, which was the company’s top sales market from 2010 to 2023. The automaker’s earnings from China fell from around $2 billion annually in 2018 to a second consecutive year of losses in 2025 as China grew its own auto manufacturing.
GM’s crosstown rival Ford is taking a different approach. It has largely scrapped plans for large EVs in exchange for a next-generation of smaller models that CEO Jim Farley believes will be the company’s saving grace against Chinese automakers.
Farley, who has been complimentary of Chinese automakers at times, said the new platform will be a simple, efficient, flexible ecosystem to deliver a family of affordable, electric, software-defined vehicles.
“This is a Model T moment for the company,” Farley said last year. “We really see, not the global [automakers] as a competitive set for our next generation of EVs, we see the Chinese. Companies like Geely and BYD … and that’s how we built our vehicle.
From autos to autonomy
Domestic EV startups such as Rivian Automotive and Saudi-backed Lucid Group — both exclusively producing vehicles in the U.S. — are facing profitability and sales challenges.
Amid the demand issues, the EV startups have tried to appeal to investors by touting themselves as technology plays rather than automakers, following in the footsteps of U.S. EV industry leader Tesla.
Tesla’s Musk has been warning about Chinese automakers for years, saying in 2023 after the rise of BYD that such companies will “demolish” global rivals without trade barriers.

Musk has historically positioned Tesla as a technology company that also sells cars despite the vast majority of its revenue comes from car sales, leasing and repairs. He took it a step further on the company’s most recent quarterly earnings call, saying that Tesla is ending production of its Model S and X vehicles and will use the factory in Fremont, California, to instead build Optimus humanoid robots.
After the original Roadster, the two models are Tesla’s oldest vehicles. The EV maker started selling the Model S sedan in 2012, and the Model X SUV three years later. They only represented about 3% of Tesla’s sales in 2025, with the company continuing to offer the Model Y, Model 3 and Cybertruck.
In recent, years the company has slashed prices for those vehicles as global competition for electric vehicles has soared.
Musk believes China will once again be the company’s main competition in its newest humanoid robot venture.
“China will definitely be the tough competition as there’s no two ways about it,” Musk said on the company’s fourth-quarter earnings call. “So I always think people outside of China kind of underestimate China. China’s an ass-kicker, next level.”
Business
S&P 500: I Sold Too Early, What Now? (Technical Analysis) (SP500)
Andrew McElroy is Chief Analyst at Matrixtrade, author of the ebook ‘Fractal Market Mastery’ and producer of the ‘Daily Edge.’ The ‘Daily Edge’ is emailed before each US session and outlines actionable ideas, directional bias, and important levels in the S&P500. It also looks at ‘What’s Hot,’ on any particular day, whether it is commodities, stocks, crypto, or forex. Andrew has developed a top-down proprietary system that starts with his weekend Seeking Alpha article focusing on the higher timeframes. Fractals, Elliott Wave, and Demark exhaustion signals are all incorporated, as are macro drivers and analysis of the market narrative. It is much more than just a few lines on a chart – it is a system developed over 15 years and proven to deliver a consistent edge. An independent trader since 2009, Andrew manages a family portfolio of stocks and ETFs with his wife and fellow Seeking Alpha contributor Macrogirl.
Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have a beneficial long position in the shares of VOO either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Seeking Alpha’s Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.
Business
ServiceNow Q1 Preview: Earnings Growth It Needs Is Too High To Justify A Buy (NYSE:NOW)
I aim to provide alpha-generating investment ideas. I am an independent investor managing my family’s portfolio, primarily via a Self Managed Super Fund. My articles deliver 5-Minute Pitches focused on the core fundamental and technical drivers of the security.I have a generalist approach as I explore, analyze and invest in any sector so long there is perceived alpha potential vs the S&P500. The typical holding period ranges between a few months to multiple years.I am very much focused on adding value via alpha generation. I always start with a Performance Assessment section for each follow-up article. I publish unusually detailed analytics on my long-only, zero-leverage global equity portfolio performance on my Hunting Alphas website every month. At Hunting Alphas, you can also access the models to all the tickers I publish on.A bit about how I approach research and coverage of a stock:I build and maintain spreadsheets showing historical data on the financials, key metric disclosures, data on the guidance and surprise trends vs consensus estimates, time-series values of the valuations vs peers, data on key coincident or leading indicators of performance and other monitorables. In addition to the company’s filings, I also keep tabs on relevant industry news and reports plus other people’s coverage of the stock. In some cases, such as during times of a CEO change, I will do a deep dive on a key leader’s background and his/her past performance record.I very rarely build DCFs and project financials many years out into the future as I don’t think it adds much value. Instead, I find it more useful to assess how a company has delivered and the broad outlook on the 5 key drivers of a DCF valuation: revenues, costs and margins, cash flow conversion, capex and investments and the interest rates (which affect the discount rate/opportunity cost of capital). In some cases, especially for companies trading at very high multiples on a TTM or 1-yr fwd basis, I do a reverse DCF to make sense of the implied growth CAGR implications.Note: Hunting Alphas is related to VishValue Research on Seeking Alpha.
Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Seeking Alpha’s Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.
Business
Germany’s Merz, Brazil’s Lula stress close European-Brazilian cooperation

Germany’s Merz, Brazil’s Lula stress close European-Brazilian cooperation
Business
Ukraine pushes for Europe to build defense system against ballistic weapons

Ukraine pushes for Europe to build defense system against ballistic weapons
Business
BNY Mellon Appreciation Fund Q1 2026 Commentary
BNY Mellon Appreciation Fund Q1 2026 Commentary
Business
Iran to resume international flights from Mashhad airport on Monday
“Permission to operate international passenger flights at Mashhad Airport has been issued, starting tomorrow,” state TV said, quoting the Civil Aviation Organisation.
The organisation later said travellers can now “purchase tickets for international routes to and from Mashhad Airport,” according to the official IRNA news agency.
Iranian airports have been closed since the outbreak of war with Israel and the United States on February 28.
The Civil Aviation Organisation had said earlier that it would start a phased reopening of Iran’s airspace, beginning with transit flights, followed by operations from eastern airports.
Airports in Tehran — Imam Khomeini and Mehrabad airports — are expected to reopen in the third phase, with western airports resuming operations in the final phase.
Business
Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Q1 2026 Commentary
Fred Alger Management, LLC (“Alger”) is a privately held $27.4 billion growth equity investment manager. Alger is a pioneer of actively managed, growth equity investing. Their journey over the past six decades has been defined by navigating change, embracing disruption, and investing in innovation. Note: This account is not managed or monitored by Fred Alger Management, and any messages sent via Seeking Alpha will not receive a response. For inquiries or communication, please use Fred Alger Management’s official channels.
Business
Rowan Street Q1 2026 Letter
syahrir maulana/iStock via Getty Images

Dear Partners,
The first quarter of 2026 gave investors plenty to worry about. Rising tensions in the Middle East pushed oil prices higher, inflation concerns resurfaced, and the long-anticipated pivot to lower interest rates continues to be postponed. Markets, never short on imagination, have begun spinning familiar narratives: that expensive money punishes growth, that AI’s promises may exceed its near-term returns, and that the safer bet lies in energy, cyclicals, and businesses whose cash flows arrive sooner rather than later. There is also a growing fear that AI itself may disrupt entire categories of existing software businesses — rendering yesterday’s winners obsolete overnight.
We will not pretend these concerns are frivolous. They are not. When the cost of capital rises, the arithmetic of investing genuinely changes — a dollar earned a decade from now is worth less today than it was in a world of cheap money. That is not opinion; it is math. And we have always believed in taking math seriously.
But here is what we have also learned, after watching markets swing from greed to panic across many cycles: the headlines that feel most urgent are rarely the ones that determine long-term outcomes. The businesses that compound wealth over decades do so not because they were spared from difficult environments, but because they were built to endure them. We have spent the past decade building a portfolio of exactly that kind.
None of what we are seeing today is new. Different costumes, same play.
Performance in Context
During the first quarter, Rowan Street declined 19.8%, compared to a 4.3% decline for the S&P 500. That is not a result we enjoy reporting. At the same time, it reflects the more concentrated approach we take and is not unusual for portfolios built around a smaller number of high-conviction investments.
We invest in a focused group of businesses that we believe can compound value at attractive rates over long periods of time. In the short term, their stock prices can be more volatile—particularly in environments like the one we are experiencing today, where interest rates are higher and investor focus has shifted toward businesses with nearer-term cash flows.
Rowan Street is designed for long-term compounding, not for minimizing short-term volatility or closely tracking a benchmark. As a result, returns can differ meaningfully from year to year.
We have seen this before.
In early 2022, we went through a similar period where stock prices declined sharply, even as the underlying businesses continued to perform well. At the time, we wrote that the portfolio was, in many ways, in one of the strongest positions in our history despite the decline in stock prices.
That did not feel obvious at the time. What followed was a period where business performance ultimately reasserted itself. The fund returned +102.6% (net) in 2023, +56.6% in 2024, and +11.1% in 2025.
As Benjamin Graham observed:
“In the short run, the market is a voting machine, but in the long run, it is a weighing machine.”
A Post-Quarter Update
We are writing this letter in mid-April, approximately two weeks after quarter-end. Since March 31, markets have moved sharply — and our portfolio has recovered approximately half of the first quarter decline. Based on our internal estimates as of April 17, year-to-date performance stands at approximately -10%, compared to the official quarter-end figure of -19.8%. We note that this mid-month figure is an internal estimate only, has not been verified by our fund administrator, and reflects only a partial month.
We share this not to suggest the difficult period is behind us — it may not be. We share it because it illustrates precisely the point we are making throughout this letter. The fundamentals of the businesses we own have not changed. Their competitive positions, earnings power, and long-term prospects remain intact, in our view. What changed was the price multiple. This is what long-term ownership of exceptional businesses actually looks like. Price and value diverge. Sometimes dramatically. The investors who benefit are those with the temperament to remain focused on the underlying businesses, not the day-to-day movements of their stock prices.
Volatility is the Price of Admission
The table below shows the annual returns of our largest holdings by portfolio weight as of March 31, 2026 and illustrates a simple reality of long-term investing: even exceptional businesses experience significant volatility. We have included an April 17 column to reflect the meaningful recovery in our portfolio since quarter-end, as discussed in the Performance section above. The figures reflect annual stock price returns and do not represent Rowan Street Capital fund performance or returns achieved by the fund on these positions.
The April 17 column tells its own story — and it is the same story this letter is built around. This is what long-term ownership actually looks like in practice. Not a smooth upward line — but a recurring series of gains, losses, and tests of conviction. Drawdowns of 30%, 50%, even 75% are not unusual. They are a recurring feature of owning exceptional businesses — not anomalies.
Everyone describes themselves as a long-term investor. Very few are willing to endure what that actually looks like. Volatility is the price of admission.
The charts that follow bring this pattern to life across three of our largest holdings — Meta Platforms, Tesla, and Shopify. Different businesses, different drawdowns, same lesson.
Meta Platforms (META)
Meta has delivered a cumulative return of approximately 1,300% since its IPO, or about 21% annually. The path to those returns, however, has been anything but smooth.
Over the past decade, the stock has experienced numerous drawdowns of 30% or more, several declines of 50% or more, and, most notably, a decline of nearly 80% in 2022.
These periods were not isolated events — they were a recurring feature of owning this business. And yet for those who remained focused on the underlying fundamentals, the long-term outcome has been exceptional.
We believe today represents one of the most compelling opportunities in Meta we have seen since 2022. Please read our full analysis below — including our views on the AI spending debate, the recent legal setbacks, and why we believe the market may be repeating a familiar mistake.
Tesla (TSLA)
Tesla provides an even more striking example—not just of volatility, but of how disproportionate long-term outcomes can be relative to the experience along the way.
Since its IPO in 2010, the stock has delivered a cumulative return of approximately 22,000%, or about 41% annually. Looking at that result today, the path can appear almost inevitable. In reality, it was anything but.
There were multiple periods along the way where the stock declined sharply—on numerous occasions by more than 50%, and once by over 70%—often accompanied by shifting narratives around the business. At different points, the concerns ranged from questions about the company’s survival, to valuation, to increasing competition, founder behavior and execution risk.
Each of those moments felt uncertain in real time. And yet, for investors who were able to remain focused on the long-term trajectory of the business, the outcome has been extraordinary.
The biggest winners rarely feel comfortable to own.
While Tesla has demonstrated this pattern over many years, our ownership of the business is still relatively recent.
We outlined our investment thesis in detail in our Q3 2025 letter, and our view remains unchanged. From here, our role is not to predict short-term movements, but to remain disciplined and allow the long-term economics of the business to play out.
Shopify (SHOP)
Shopify has been an exceptional business over time, compounding at over 40% annually since its IPO.
The path to those returns, however, has been far from smooth, including several sharp drawdowns and a decline of more than 80% in 2022.
We experienced this firsthand. After initiating our position in early 2022, the stock declined by an additional ~50%. We believed the drawdown reflected multiple compression, not fundamental deterioration. The business continued to grow revenues, expand its merchant ecosystem, and strengthen its competitive position. The price was broken. The company was not.
It did not feel good. The best opportunities rarely do.
What followed was a long and uncomfortable period of patience before payoff. The stock rebounded 124% in 2023 — and yet we were still underwater on our investment. It was not until 2024 — when Shopify generated over $1 billion in operating profit for the first time and the stock gained another 37% — that we finally got our capital back and began generating real returns. The stock then rose 51% in 2025, making it our best performer of the year.
Three years of patience. Three years of watching the business execute while the stock tested our conviction repeatedly.
More recently the stock has again declined meaningfully — down 26% at quarter-end, though it has since recovered to approximately -17% as of mid-April. There is nothing unusual about that. It is the same pattern, playing out again.
Shopify is a clear example of why patience — especially through periods of valuation compression — is often required before fundamentals are fully reflected in stock prices. In our experience, the returns in businesses like Shopify are earned by those willing to endure periods when stock prices and business performance temporarily move in opposite directions.
Underlying Business Performance
Despite the recent decline in stock prices, the underlying businesses we own continue to perform well. Based on current estimates, our portfolio companies are expected to grow revenues at approximately 18% annually and earnings at approximately 21% annually over the next several years. These figures represent a weighted average across a group of businesses operating in different industries and geographies.
In our experience, periods like this — when price and value diverge — have consistently provided the most attractive investment opportunities.
In our Q2 2025 letter, we wrote that our edge does not come from predicting short-term market movements, but from our willingness to own a concentrated group of high-quality businesses and remain focused on their long-term compounding potential.
That principle is far easier to articulate when markets are rising than when they are declining. Periods like the one we are experiencing today are when that discipline is tested — and, in our view, when it matters most.
Portfolio Update: Constellation Software
During the quarter, we initiated a position in Constellation Software (TSE: CSU) (CNSWF), funded by the sale of the remainder of our Spotify position. Constellation is one of the most exceptional capital allocation platforms in the public markets — a company that has compounded shareholder capital at approximately 28% annually since its 2006 IPO by systematically acquiring and operating mission-critical vertical market software businesses. The stock has recently declined approximately 50% from its highs, creating what we believe is a rare entry point into a business of this quality. For those interested in a detailed discussion of our investment thesis — including our views on the AI disruption narrative and the recent leadership transition — we have published a full write-up on our Substack.
The Opportunity Today
We want to be direct with our partners and with anyone considering investing alongside us for the first time.
We have been here before — not just as observers, but as participants with real stakes. In 2021-2022, when our portfolio declined sharply we remained focused on the underlying businesses and their long-term prospects. We wrote at the time that we believed the portfolio was in one of the strongest positions in its history. Few wanted to hear it. Even fewer wanted to invest. What followed was a cumulative net return of approximately +252% over the subsequent three-year period (2023–2025).
We are not promising a repeat. No honest investor can make that claim.
But here is what we can say with conviction: the businesses we own today are stronger than they were in 2022. Their competitive positions are deeper, their earnings power is greater, and their long-term opportunities are larger. In many ways, we believe this is the strongest and most focused portfolio we have built since our inception in 2015 — a small group of exceptional businesses that have each been tested through adversity and emerged with their competitive positions intact or strengthened.
And yet their stock prices have declined meaningfully from recent highs. In our view, the gap between what these businesses are worth and what the market is willing to pay for them today is as wide as it has been since that period.
We have invested a significant majority of our personal net worth alongside yours. We earn nothing unless our partners make money. That is not a marketing line — it is the structure we chose deliberately on day one, because we believe it is the only honest way to manage other people’s capital.
Periods like this are never comfortable. They were not comfortable in 2022, and they are not comfortable today. But in our eleven years of managing capital through euphoria and despair, one lesson has proven itself repeatedly: it is precisely in these moments — when prices are low, sentiment is poor, and patience feels unrewarded — that the most important long-term returns are made.
To our existing partners — thank you for your continued trust and patience. We have been here before, and we remain as convicted as ever in the businesses we own together. If your circumstances allow, we believe adding to your investment at current levels represents one of the more compelling opportunities we have seen since 2022.
To those considering investing alongside us for the first time — if this way of thinking resonates with you, we would welcome the opportunity to partner over the long term.
Best regards,
Alex and Joe
Editor’s Note: The summary bullets for this article were chosen by Seeking Alpha editors.
Business
War crisis revives stagflation dangers for global economy
Whether the twin blows affecting growth and inflation seen in purchasing manager indexes after the first month of the Iran conflict intensified during month two will be a key focus.
The initial take for April in economies from Australia to the US will be published on Thursday. Among those covered by Bloomberg forecasts, indexes in Germany, France, the euro zone and the UK are all anticipated to show broad deterioration, while the American indicators are seen little changed.
Ultimately, the numbers may point to the degree that stagflation is lurking. That ominous term – evoking the noxious mix of surging prices and stalling growth of the 1970s – was cited by Chris Williamson, chief business economist at PMI-compiler S&P Global, when summing up risks highlighted by the overall global measure in March.
The survey numbers follow a week of bleak stock-taking in Washington, where finance chiefs were warned by the International Monetary Fund of a range of potential outcomes that included a near-recession for the world. Notwithstanding the current Middle East ceasefire, the damage to growth and inflation can’t be easily undone.
“Even if the war ends tomorrow, it would take quite some time for the recovery to kick in,” IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva told Bloomberg Television. “The impact is already baked in.”
For all the gloom, multiple policymakers remain cautious about how to respond. European Central Bank chief economist Philip Lane described how he and his colleagues may treat reports such as the PMIs when they set interest rates later this month.”We will have a rich set of survey data,” Lane said in Washington. “Of course, the people who are answering those surveys are looking at the same world we are looking at.” And for now, not many will have a decisive idea about what’s going to happen, he added.
ECB officials will also get French business confidence on Thursday and Germany’s closely watched Ifo business climate gauge on Friday. Their Federal Reserve peers will see the University of Michigan’s sentiment index, also at the end of the week.
Business
US security agency is using Anthropic’s Mythos despite blacklist, Axios reports

US security agency is using Anthropic’s Mythos despite blacklist, Axios reports
-
NewsBeat7 days agoPep Guardiola and Gary Neville agree over Arsenal title problem that benefits Man City
-
Crypto World6 days agoThe SEC Conditionalises DeFi Platforms to Be Avoided for Broker Registration
-
Fashion2 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Theodora Dress
-
Crypto World6 days agoSEC Signals Exemption for Crypto Interfaces From Broker Registration
-
News Videos5 days agoSecure crypto trading starts with an FIU-registered
-
Sports2 days agoNWFL Suspends Two Players Over Post-Match Clash in Ado-Ekiti
-
Crypto World6 days agoSEC Proposes Certain Crypto Interfaces Don’t Need to Register as Brokers
-
NewsBeat5 days agoTrump and Pope Leo: Behind their disagreement over Iran war
-
Business6 hours agoPowerball Result April 18, 2026: No Jackpot Winner in Powerball Draw: $75 Million Rolls Over
-
Politics2 days agoPalestine barred from entering Canada for FIFA Congress
-
Crypto World2 days agoRussia Pushes Bill to Criminalize Unregistered Crypto Services
-
Sports6 days agoNWFL opens Pathway for new Clubs ahead of 2026 Season
-
Politics11 hours agoZack Polanski demands ‘council homes not luxury flats for foreign investors’
-
Entertainment6 days agoBrand New Day’ Footage Reveals the Devastating Impact of ‘Now Way Home’
-
Business3 days agoCreo Medical agree sale of its manufacturing operation
-
Crypto World7 days agoTrump whales load up ahead of Mar-a-Lago luncheon.
-
Crypto World7 days agoSei Network Enters Quiet Reset Phase as On-Chain Metrics Signal a Slowdown in 2026
-
Business7 days ago
Kering slides after Morgan Stanley downgrade, Gucci woes loom
-
Tech7 days agoGoogle adds E2E encryption to Gmail for iOS and Android enterprise users
-
Tech7 days agoApple glasses won’t go brand shopping like Meta did with Ray-Ban and Oakley








You must be logged in to post a comment Login