TUCSON, Ariz. — The mysterious abduction of 84-year-old Nancy Guthrie from her Catalina Foothills home on Feb. 1 remains unsolved more than 10 weeks later, with authorities and her family pleading for new information as investigators chase ransom-style notes and analyze limited physical evidence in one of Arizona’s most high-profile missing persons cases.

Nancy Guthrie, mother of NBC’s “Today” show co-anchor Savannah Guthrie, was taken from her bed in the early morning hours, leaving behind critical medication, her phone and other personal items. Drops of blood were found on her doorstep, and doorbell camera footage captured a masked, gloved intruder tampering with the device before the footage went dark. Her pacemaker data reportedly went offline about 41 minutes later.

Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos and the FBI have described the case as a targeted abduction. The family has offered a $1 million reward, supplemented by a $100,000 contribution from the FBI, for information leading to her safe return or the arrest of those responsible.

### Latest Developments as Search Enters Third Month

As of April 12, 2026, no arrests have been made and no suspects have been publicly named. Multiple ransom-style notes have surfaced, including recent communications sent to TMZ demanding Bitcoin in exchange for information about Guthrie’s location or her body. Some earlier notes were considered potentially legitimate by the family, though authorities continue to evaluate all communications.

Savannah Guthrie returned to the “Today” show anchor desk in early April after a two-month absence. In an emotional interview with colleague Hoda Kotb, she described the family’s ongoing anguish and revealed new details, including that her mother was in pajamas and barefoot when taken. Savannah expressed belief that the abduction was linked to ransom demands tied to her public profile and voiced self-blame for the family’s heightened visibility.

The Guthrie family has been fully cleared as suspects. Sheriff Nanos publicly stated they have been “nothing but cooperative” and are victims in the case.

### Challenges in the Investigation

The rugged desert terrain surrounding Catalina Foothills has complicated extensive ground searches involving helicopters, drones and volunteer teams. Nancy Guthrie’s age and medical needs — including daily medications she did not have with her — heighten concerns for her well-being.

DNA from gloves discovered about two miles from the home is being analyzed and entered into databases. Investigators have examined neighborhood footage and vehicles but have released limited details publicly to protect the investigation.

Some criticism has emerged regarding early handling of the crime scene, with a former Pima County sheriff claiming potential issues that may have affected evidence preservation. Sheriff Nanos has pushed back, expressing confidence that persistence and new tips will solve the case.

### Nancy Guthrie’s Life and Family Impact

A beloved Tucson community member, Nancy Guthrie was independent, active in her church and known for her faith and resilience. Widowed since 1988, she raised Savannah, Annie and Camron largely on her own. She had appeared on the “Today” show with her daughter over the years.

Savannah has shared heartfelt public messages, including an Easter reflection on the unique pain of uncertainty. “I have wondered whether Jesus really ever experienced this particular wound,” she said in a church video. The family continues to hold hope while navigating intense media scrutiny and online speculation.

### Broader Context and Public Response

The case has drawn national attention, blending elements of celebrity, true crime and vulnerability in old age. It has prompted discussions about home security, the risks of public profiles and the challenges of investigating elderly abductions, which are statistically rare.

Community support remains strong in Tucson, with prayer vigils and continued volunteer efforts. Online, tips and theories circulate alongside calls for respectful coverage. A separate arrest of a Pima County deputy on an unrelated kidnapping charge briefly fueled speculation but was not connected to the Guthrie case.

Authorities urge anyone with information — even seemingly minor details — to contact the Pima County Sheriff’s Office or the FBI tip line at 1-800-CALL-FBI. Digital evidence, potential cross-border movements and analysis of the ransom notes remain active leads.

### Family’s Plea and Hope for Resolution

Savannah Guthrie has emphasized the family’s gratitude for public support while asking for continued vigilance. As the investigation stretches into its third month, the focus remains on bringing Nancy home safely. The case serves as a sobering reminder of the fragility of safety even in quiet, upscale neighborhoods.

No major updates were released over the weekend, but officials say the case is very much active with resources dedicated from multiple agencies. For the Guthrie family, each day without answers brings renewed determination alongside profound grief.

Anyone with potential leads is strongly encouraged to come forward. The $1.1 million combined reward underscores the urgency and commitment to resolving this painful mystery.

Police are investigating a mass shooting at a Chick-fil-A restaurant in New Jersey Saturday evening, according to reports.

The shooting took place at a Chick-fil-A in Union, New Jersey, according to NJ.com. 

It was not immediately clear how many people were shot or the extent of their injuries, but RLS Media reported at least six people were shot.

“This is an active and ongoing investigation,” a spokesperson for the Union County Prosecutor’s Office told the outlet. “More information will be released as it becomes available.”

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

An undisclosed Chick-fil-A location with a drive thru.  (Chick-fil-A / Fox News)

FOX Business has reached out to the Union County Prosecutor’s Office and Union police for additional information.

Chick-fil-A’s corporate office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.

By Jennifer Nash

The S&P 500 snapped its seven-day win streak on Friday but still pulled out its second consecutive weekly gain, achieving its largest increase since November. The index climbed 3.9% from last week, a rally largely driven

BTC is up 1.5% since the Iran conflict began, outperforming equities, gold, and bonds over the same period. Within crypto, AI tokens were the strongest sector in Q1 with TAO surging 125% from its Feb low. The ceasefire rally was fueled by new

Choosing between PEZA and BOI affects export compliance or domestic market access, influencing revenue eligibility, tax treatment, and supply chain design in the Philippines. Each has distinct operational and regulatory implications.

Key Differences: PEZA vs. BOI

Choosing between the Philippine Economic Zone Authority (PEZA) and the Board of Investments (BOI) impacts how a business is structured regarding export and domestic market access. This choice directly influences revenue eligibility, tax treatment, and supply chain dynamics. Companies need to assess whether their operations align more with export compliance under PEZA or domestic market strategies under BOI.

Export vs. Domestic Focus

To qualify for PEZA, a business must maintain an export ratio of around 70%. Failing this, BOI becomes the default route, catering to domestic or mixed-market models. The Philippines, with a nominal GDP nearing US$500 billion, thrives mainly on internal consumption. Therefore, logistics serving domestic demands typically follow BOI registration. However, PEZA might suit export-linked activities, depending on their design and operational objectives.

Operational Constraints and Flexibility

PEZA registration mandates operations within designated economic zones, enhancing customs supervision and minimizing duty leakage. However, it limits flexibility. BOI offers the flexibility of nationwide site selection, allowing businesses to operate closer to demand hubs like Metro Manila. This geographically strategic positioning enhances distribution efficiency. Yet, it lacks the automatic bonded import-export framework found in economic zones, influencing operational decisions and compliance dynamics.

PEZA vs. BOI in the Philippines: Choosing the Right Incentive Structure for Your Manufacturing or Logistics Model

In the Philippines, manufacturers and logistics companies often weigh the benefits of the Philippine Economic Zone Authority (PEZA) against the Board of Investments (BOI) incentives. PEZA offers benefits like income tax holidays, VAT zero-rating, and simplified import-export procedures, primarily targeting businesses within designated economic zones. This structure suits companies looking for export-driven models and streamlined operations, where ease of logistics and reduced taxation can significantly bolster competitiveness.

Conversely, the BOI caters to broader enterprises, not limited to specific zones, offering income tax holidays and duty-free importation benefits. It’s ideal for businesses focused on domestic markets or specialized industries. While PEZA emphasizes exports, BOI incentives align with local integration, providing flexibility in location and industry investment. Understanding your target market and operational priorities is crucial in choosing the right framework for sustainable growth.