Connect with us

Business

Ford Recalls More Than 741,000 Vehicles Over Transmission Flaw That Could Cause Cars to Roll While Parked

Published

on

Ford Logo

Ford Motor Co. is recalling more than 741,000 vehicles in the United States after discovering a transmission defect that could damage the vehicles’ park system, potentially allowing them to move unexpectedly even when drivers believe they are safely parked.

According to a report filed with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the recall covers certain Ford F-150 pickup trucks, Ford Explorer and Ford Expedition SUVs, along with Lincoln Aviator and Lincoln Navigator models from the 2018 through 2021 model years. The affected vehicles span some of Ford’s most popular and high-volume nameplates, meaning the recall touches a substantial cross-section of the automaker’s recent lineup.

The underlying problem stems from a transmission issue that can cause temporary engagement of the vehicle’s parking pawl, a mechanical component responsible for locking the transmission and preventing the vehicle from rolling once it has been shifted into park, while the vehicle is still in motion. According to the NHTSA report, this can occur when certain gear shifts are commanded by the transmission while the vehicle continues moving, potentially damaging components within the park system itself.

If that damage occurs, the consequences can extend well beyond a simple mechanical malfunction. Once the park system has been compromised, the transmission’s ability to hold the vehicle stationary in park may be affected, particularly in situations where the driver has not also engaged the parking brake. The NHTSA report warns that this creates the risk of unintended vehicle movement even after a driver has shifted into park and exited the vehicle, a scenario the agency said increases the risk of a crash or injury.

Advertisement

The scope of real-world consequences tied to the defect is already documented in regulatory filings. According to the NHTSA, Ford has acknowledged 24 allegations of property damage connected to the issue, along with nine alleged injuries. Of those nine injury allegations, two specifically involve claims of emotional injury, suggesting that beyond physical harm, some affected owners have reported psychological distress tied to experiencing unexpected vehicle movement.

Ford’s remedy for the defect centers on a software update rather than a full mechanical overhaul for most affected vehicles. Owners whose vehicles are included in the recall will receive notification by mail directing them to bring their vehicle to a Ford or Lincoln dealership, where technicians will update the vehicle’s Powertrain Control Module to the latest available software version. As part of that same dealership visit, technicians will also inspect the transmission for any existing park system damage and replace damaged components as necessary. Ford has confirmed that both the software update and any required component replacement will be performed at no cost to vehicle owners.

The recall adds to what has been a recurring pattern of safety actions affecting Ford’s full-size truck and SUV lineup in recent years, as the automaker continues working through various mechanical and software-related issues identified across its most popular vehicle platforms. The F-150, in particular, has remained one of the best-selling vehicles in the United States for decades, meaning recalls affecting that model tend to carry an outsized impact simply due to the sheer number of vehicles on American roads.

For owners uncertain about whether their specific vehicle is included in the recall, Ford has set up a dedicated customer service line at 1-866-436-7332 to field questions and provide guidance on next steps. Owners can also contact the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration directly through its Vehicle Safety Hotline at 1-888-327-4236, a federal resource that fields inquiries related to vehicle recalls, safety defects and broader automotive safety concerns across all manufacturers, not just Ford.

Advertisement

Federal regulators have continued to emphasize that consumers should not wait for any visible symptoms before addressing an active recall, given that defects like this one can remain undetected during normal driving conditions until the specific circumstances that trigger the malfunction actually occur. Because the issue specifically involves the parking pawl engaging unexpectedly while the vehicle is still moving, drivers may have limited warning before a malfunction affects their ability to safely park the vehicle using the transmission alone.

This recall underscores the continued importance of using a vehicle’s parking brake in conjunction with the transmission’s park setting, a practice that safety officials have long recommended as a general precaution regardless of any specific known defect, since it provides a secondary mechanism for keeping a vehicle stationary even if the primary transmission-based park function were to fail for any reason. In this particular case, NHTSA’s report specifically noted that the risk of unintended movement is heightened in situations where the parking brake has not also been applied, reinforcing that general safety guidance as a meaningful interim precaution for owners awaiting their dealership appointment.

Vehicle recalls of this scale are not uncommon across the broader auto industry, where manufacturers routinely identify and address defects affecting hundreds of thousands or even millions of vehicles as part of ongoing safety monitoring required under federal law. Automakers are generally required to notify NHTSA and initiate a recall once a safety-related defect has been identified, regardless of how many real-world incidents have actually been documented, since the regulatory threshold for action is based on the existence and nature of the defect rather than solely on the volume of confirmed incidents.

Owners of affected Ford F-150, Explorer, Expedition, Lincoln Aviator and Lincoln Navigator vehicles from the 2018 through 2021 model years are encouraged to watch for official recall notification by mail and to schedule a service appointment with their local Ford or Lincoln dealer as soon as that notice arrives, given the safety risks associated with potential unintended vehicle movement while parked.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Business

Singapore vs Hong Kong vs Dubai: Regional HQ Trade-Offs for Investors

Published

on

Singapore vs Hong Kong vs Dubai: Regional HQ Trade-Offs for Investors

Global reforms emphasize control and decision-making authority over legal forms, shifting regional headquarters evaluation to governance, risk management, and value creation, impacted by tax rates and regulatory expectations.

Evolving Evaluation of Regional Headquarters

Global minimum tax, stricter substance enforcement, and geopolitical fragmentation have reshaped how regional headquarters are assessed. Singapore, Hong Kong, and Dubai now serve distinct roles, each aligned with different strategies for controlling operations and managing risks. They are no longer interchangeable hubs competing on similar benefits, but rather centers tailored to specific business models and regulatory environments.

Authority and Control Define a Headquarters

The focus has shifted from a legal entity’s structure to the authority it exercises within an organization. Regulators and counterparties increasingly scrutinize where key decisions—related to capital allocation, pricing, treasury, and risk management—are made. An entity exercising discretion in these areas is viewed as a true control center, influencing regulatory treatment and compliance risk instead of mere administrative support.

Governance and Control in Practice

Beyond reporting functions, the extent of authority impacts governance, documentation, and accountability standards. These factors determine a company’s regulatory exposure and defenses. While corporate tax rates like Singapore’s 17% and Hong Kong’s 16.5% are still relevant, emphasis now also rests on where value creation and control are evidenced within the organization.

Advertisement


Read the original article : Singapore vs Hong Kong vs Dubai: Regional HQ Trade-Offs for Investors

Continue Reading

Business

Amazon and Microsoft Delivered Major Earnings Wins

Published

on

Amazon and Microsoft Delivered Major Earnings Wins

Are you tired? I’m tired. In addition to four Big Tech companies reporting earnings this past week, the calendar included results for second-quarter gross domestic product and the June personal consumption expenditures price index, along with the Federal Reserve’s interest-rate decision. Unscheduled, there was a meltdown of the artificial-intelligence trade, as highly leveraged bull positions were liquidated. The iShares Semiconductor exchange-traded fund was down 12% across three days, and one of the most successful AI investors—hedge fund Situational Awareness—saw margin calls and forced sales.

Continue Reading

Business

Exclusive | KKR Near Deal to Buy Integer Holdings

Published

on

Exclusive | KKR Near Deal to Buy Integer Holdings

Private-equity firm KKR KKR is near a deal to take medical-device outsourcing company Integer Holdings ITGR private, according to people familiar with the matter.

The details

The deal, which could come as soon as next week, would value the Plano, Texas-based company at roughly $127 a share, the people said. There are no guarantees a deal will come together.

Copyright ©2026 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Continue Reading

Business

Exclusive-Japan to announce Tokyo, Washington took joint action on yen, sources say

Published

on


Exclusive-Japan to announce Tokyo, Washington took joint action on yen, sources say

Continue Reading

Business

Apple Slump Drags on Tech Stocks

Published

on

Stocks Fall After Trump Picks Kevin Warsh as Next Fed Chair

A 9% selloff in Apple stock hasn’t done much to slow down the Nasdaq today.

Apple was recently down about $470 billion in market capitalization, on pace for its largest one-day market cap decline on record and the second-largest of any U.S. company. If it holds, the decline will be Apple’s biggest since 2020.

Copyright ©2026 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Continue Reading

Business

Siltronic AG ADR 2026 Q2 – Results – Earnings Call Presentation (OTCMKTS:SLTCY) 2026-08-01

Published

on

OneWater Marine Inc. (ONEW) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

This article was written by

Seeking Alpha’s transcripts team is responsible for the development of all of our transcript-related projects. We currently publish thousands of quarterly earnings calls per quarter on our site and are continuing to grow and expand our coverage. The purpose of this profile is to allow us to share with our readers new transcript-related developments. Thanks, SA Transcripts Team

Continue Reading

Business

Israeli strikes kill at least four in Gaza despite Trump announcing breakthrough

Published

on


Israeli strikes kill at least four in Gaza despite Trump announcing breakthrough

Continue Reading

Business

Three dead in Idaho shopping center shooting

Published

on


Three dead in Idaho shopping center shooting

Continue Reading

Business

Retail Earnings Season Could Be the Messiest Yet

Published

on

Retail Earnings Season Could Be the Messiest Yet

Retailers’ second-quarter earnings season is poised to begin in mid-August, and it may look a bit like a sandcastle being reclaimed by the sea: lumpy, all over the place, and with plenty of moving parts.

Continue Reading

Business

Westinghouse IPO Could Be America’s Biggest Nuclear Offering Yet

Published

on

Westinghouse IPO Could Be America’s Biggest Nuclear Offering Yet

Westinghouse IPO Could Be America’s Biggest Nuclear Offering Yet

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025