Nissan is recalling more than 51,000 Kicks SUVs because a software defect can cause the dashboard display to go partially or completely blank, potentially preventing drivers from seeing critical vehicle information.

The recall affects 51,598 model year 2025-2026 Nissan Kicks vehicles manufactured between June 24, 2024, and Jan. 9, 2026, according to documents filed with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Nissan said a software logic error within the vehicle’s combination meter, or instrument cluster, can trigger a communication failure between electronic controllers during a cold startup. If that occurs, the display screen may show a partial image, a blue screen or go completely blank.

The malfunction can prevent warning lights, indicators and other safety-related information from appearing on the dashboard, causing the vehicles to fall out of compliance with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 101 governing vehicle controls and displays.

NISSAN RECALLING OVER 26,000 VEHICLES DUE TO DOOR ISSUE THAT COULD INCREASE RISK OF CRASH

“If the combi-meter display cannot show safety related telltales and indicators, the driver may unknowingly operate the vehicle in an unsafe condition, increasing the risk of a crash,” Nissan said in its filing with federal regulators.

Nissan identified seven technical reports and 205 warranty claims related to the issue between October 2024 and April 2026, though the company said it is not aware of any crashes or injuries connected to the defect.

The automaker said it first became aware of the issue after receiving a field report involving a 2025 Nissan Kicks with a blank display screen at startup. Although technicians initially could not duplicate the problem, diagnostic trouble codes related to the instrument cluster and communication systems were stored in the vehicle.

NISSAN ISSUES MASSIVE RECALL AS FAULTY PART THREATENS ENGINE FAILURE

Over the following months, Nissan and supplier Continental investigated additional reports involving intermittent blank or blue-screen displays. Engineers ultimately traced the issue to an integrated-circuit malfunction that can disrupt communication within the instrument cluster, causing the display to go blank.

The recall affects one of Nissan’s newer U.S. models and comes as automakers continue to grapple with software-related defects that have become an increasingly common source of vehicle recalls.

NISSAN INCREASES JOB CUTS TO 20K BY 2027

To fix the problem, dealers will update the combination meter software at no cost to owners. The repair is expected to take about 30 minutes.

Dealer notifications began May 22, while owner notification letters are scheduled to be mailed beginning July 1. Vehicle owners can contact Nissan customer service at 800-647-7261 and reference recall number PMA66.

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

FOX Business has reached out to Nissan for additional comment on the matter.

NEW YORK — Ubisoft’s popular tactical shooter Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege faced a setback Tuesday as the launch of its highly anticipated Year 11 Season 2, Operation System Override, encountered extended server maintenance, frustrating players eager to access new content.

The official Rainbow Six Siege account on X announced the delay shortly after the scheduled 9:00 a.m. EDT start time, stating that maintenance had been extended while teams worked to bring the new season live. “The Operation System Override maintenance will be extended for an estimated 30 minutes,” the account posted, followed by a later update noting ongoing work with further details to come.

The season introduces several major features, including the Ranked Overhaul 3.0, a new map called Calypso Casino, and updates to the operator Dokkaebi, who receives a new XK23 assault rifle and a remastered Jegeo Payload ability. These changes aim to refresh competitive play and expand the game’s tactical depth as it enters its 11th year.

Player Reactions and Community Frustration

The delay triggered a wave of responses from the player base, with many expressing disappointment over the timing on launch day. Comments ranged from understanding calls for thorough testing to sharp criticism of recurring issues with season rollouts. Some players noted the irony of the “System Override” theme amid technical hurdles, while others urged patience to avoid rushed implementation.

This is not the first time Rainbow Six Siege has experienced launch-day hiccups. The long-running title, known for its destructible environments and operator-based gameplay, has built a dedicated following despite occasional server and update challenges common in live-service games.

What Operation System Override Brings

The new season focuses heavily on competitive improvements. The Ranked 3.0 overhaul promises better matchmaking, clearer progression systems, and adjustments designed to reward skill more consistently. Ubisoft highlighted these changes in pre-launch notes, aiming to address longstanding player feedback on ranking fairness.

The Calypso Casino map introduces a fresh venue with casino-themed aesthetics, offering new lines of sight, destructible elements, and strategic opportunities. Dokkaebi’s updates enhance her utility, blending her existing hacking capabilities with improved firepower.

These additions come as the game continues to evolve following its shift toward broader accessibility. Earlier updates in Year 11 emphasized quality-of-life improvements, and Operation System Override builds on that momentum.

Broader Context for Rainbow Six Siege in 2026

Now in its second decade, Rainbow Six Siege remains one of Ubisoft’s flagship titles with a strong esports scene and consistent player base. The game has undergone significant transformations, including major balance passes, anti-cheat enhancements, and content expansions to keep veteran players engaged while attracting newcomers.

The Year 11 roadmap reflects Ubisoft’s commitment to the title’s longevity. With free-to-play elements and cross-platform play fully integrated, the studio continues investing in infrastructure and new features. However, technical reliability during peak update periods remains a point of discussion within the community.

Tuesday’s maintenance extension is expected to be resolved within hours, though exact resumption times were not immediately confirmed. The team emphasized that they would not rush the process to ensure stability.

Impact on Players and Esports

For casual players, the delay means postponed access to new operators, weapons, and cosmetics. Competitive players and streamers, who often plan content around season launches, face rescheduled streams and practice sessions. The delay could also affect early leaderboard activity once servers return.

Esports programming tied to the new season may see minor adjustments, though major tournaments typically follow a structured calendar that accounts for such variables. The ongoing R6 Stage 1 and preparations for larger events like the Six Invitational continue unaffected in the short term.

Ubisoft’s Track Record and Future Outlook

Ubisoft has a history of supporting Rainbow Six Siege through consistent seasonal content, a model that has sustained the game far beyond initial expectations. Each season typically brings operator reworks, map updates, and balance tweaks informed by data and community input.

Analysts note that while technical issues can temporarily dent player sentiment, the game’s core loop and dedicated fanbase provide resilience. Long-term success depends on delivering promised features like marketplace improvements and continued anti-toxicity measures.

As maintenance progresses, players are advised to monitor official channels for updates. Ubisoft’s support team is likely addressing backend issues to minimize post-launch bugs, a standard practice for major live-service deployments.

Community and Industry Perspective

The incident highlights challenges faced by live-service games in 2026, where high player expectations meet complex technical demands. Similar delays have occurred across titles from various publishers, often sparking temporary backlash before content releases restore enthusiasm.

For Rainbow Six Siege, the focus remains on delivering a polished experience. Once available, Operation System Override is poised to reinvigorate gameplay with its ranked changes and fresh map. Players can expect detailed patch notes upon launch detailing exact balance adjustments and bug fixes.

As the day progresses, attention will shift from the delay to in-game reactions. Early impressions of the new map and operator changes will likely dominate discussions once servers stabilize.

The extension serves as a reminder of the meticulous work required to maintain a title with millions of active users. Ubisoft’s transparency through real-time updates helps manage expectations, even if it doesn’t fully alleviate frustration on launch day.

With Rainbow Six Siege showing no signs of slowing down, this season represents another chapter in its enduring story. Fans will soon be able to dive into the new content, testing strategies on Calypso Casino and climbing the updated ranked ladder.

SpaceX, Elon Musk‘s rocket and satellite company, plans to target a valuation of $1.75 trillion in its blockbuster initial public offering, which will consist entirely of new shares, three people familiar with the matter told Reuters on Tuesday.

The IPO is expected to be structured as an all-primary offering, meaning all proceeds would go to the company and existing SpaceX shareholders will not be able to sell any of their shares in the IPO, the sources said. Shareholders would likely have to wait until at least after the company reports its first quarterly earnings, under a staggered lockup, Reuters previously reported.

After some early meetings with investors, or a “testing the waters” process, the company has indicated it plans to raise at least $75 billion in its base offering, the sources said, requesting anonymity to discuss confidential information. ‌The greenshoe option, set at ⁠15%, would ⁠allow underwriters to sell additional shares if investor demand exceeds expectations, one of the sources said.

Pure primary offerings are not unprecedented, although they are not the most common structure for large listings, which are often a mix of primary and secondary shares allowing early investors to sell down stakes.

In 2021, for instance, Rivian Automotive’s IPO was structured entirely as a primary issuance, with early backers including Amazon and Ford not selling shares at the time of listing as the company raised capital to fund expansion.

Other features of the proposed offering that diverge from conventional public listings are early inclusion in the Nasdaq 100 index and unusual provisions giving Musk effective control over the board and his roles as chief executive and chairman.
The move marks the first time SpaceX has communicated specific fundraising and valuation targets to banks after early investor meetings, as it prepares for what is expected to be the largest-ever IPO. Reuters ⁠previously reported the ‌company was considering a preliminary valuation of around $1.75 trillion. The roadshow for the IPO is set to begin on Thursday, Reuters previously reported. The plans, including the size of the raise, are subject to change as investor meetings get under way, the sources cautioned.

The IPO will give public investors a rare opportunity to ⁠buy into Musk’s vision for space, satellite communications and artificial intelligence through SpaceX, which has emerged as the crown jewel of the world’s richest person’s business empire.

SpaceX did not respond to a request for comment.

MEGA IPO WAVE
The listing is expected to kick off a wave of mega IPOs, with SpaceX, OpenAI and Anthropic together poised to add almost $4 trillion in market capitalization to public markets and intensify competition for investor dollars.

Unlike most IPO candidates, SpaceX lacks a clear public market benchmark. Analysts say investors must piece together comparisons from aerospace, telecom and defense companies while factoring in Starlink’s growth potential and Musk’s long-term ambitions, making valuation a complex task.

For many investors, the bet is as much on Musk as on SpaceX. His track record at electric-vehicle company Tesla and his ability to galvanize retail traders could likewise spur strong demand for shares, as his reputation has done for past ventures.

Still, two of SpaceX’s three businesses are burning cash, with only its connectivity segment, home ‌to the Starlink satellite constellation, generating profits and widely viewed as the company’s cash cow.

Beyond rockets and satellites, SpaceX is pitching investors a future that includes ambitious projects such as data centers in orbit, positioning itself to benefit from a surge in AI-related infrastructure spending.

SpaceX merged with Musk’s AI startup xAI earlier this year in a deal that valued the rocket and satellite ⁠company at $1 trillion and the developer of the Grok chatbot at $250 billion.

Its revenue rose to $4.69 billion in the three months ended March 31 from $4.07 billion a year ago. Losses widened to $1.27 per share versus 18 cents per share over the same period.

In 2025, SpaceX’s revenue jumped to $18.67 billion from $14.02 billion a year earlier, but the company swung to a net loss of $4.94 billion from a profit of $791 million.

Since a large part of SpaceX’s pitch to investors hinges on Musk, some corporate governance concerns could give investors pause, experts have said. Measures, including a dual-class share structure laid out in the IPO prospectus, concentrate voting power in the hands of Musk and a small group of insiders.

SpaceX is aiming to trade on the Nasdaq under the ticker symbol “SPCX.” The debut is expected as early as June 12, Reuters has previously reported, after the company accelerated the timeline of its IPO.

Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, BofA Securities, Citigroup and J.P. Morgan are the joint book-running managers for the offering, leading a syndicate of global investment banks underwriting the deal.

The eight-metre long piece, woven in the blue and gold of Greggs’ famous logo, will be on display at London’s Design Museum this weekend to coincide with National Sausage Roll Day

Greggs has taken on the Bayeux Tapestry with the creation of a sausage roll-inspired “Ta-Pastry”, crafted by expert embroiderers. The eight-metre masterpiece — stitched in the distinctive blue and gold of Greggs’ iconic branding — will go on show at London’s Design Museum this weekend to mark national Sausage Roll Day.

The piece came to life after Greggs brought in Royal embroiderers Hawthorne and Heaney to stitch six illustrated chapters chronicling the history of the sausage roll. The story, complete with Latin headings, spans from Greggs’ founder John Gregg’s modest bicycle rounds along the streets of Newcastle right through to the launch of the vegan sausage roll.

The work has been unveiled as plans press ahead to bring the celebrated Bayeux Tapestry to the UK for a special exhibition. Millions of visitors are anticipated to flock to see the tapestry when it arrives at the British Museum later this year.

Zoe Harris, customer director at Greggs, said: “The Greggs Sausage Roll is woven into the very fabric of British culture, which is why for National Sausage Roll Day we’ve partnered with master royal embroiderers and the Design Museum to create an 8-metre ‘Ta‐Pastry’. Just as the Bayeux Tapestry captured a turning point in history, this 200-hour hand-stitched masterpiece is a fitting tribute to this much-loved British icon – because some legends deserve more than just a paper bag.”

Tim Marlow, chief executive and Director at the Design Museum added: “Greggs is a great British brand and what better way to mark National Sausage Roll Day than by immortalising this humble pastry in a tapestry? It will be unlike any other woven artwork ever created and a mouth-watering appetiser for the Bayeux mania to come.”, reports Chronicle Live.

The “Ta-pastry” represents the latest marketing stunt from Greggs to grab headlines in recent years. The firm previously hoodwinked consumers with an upmarket food fair stall called Gregory and Gregory, and has rolled out both jewellery collections and clothing ranges.

It has also partnered with Newcastle department store chain Fenwick on a Greggs-themed champagne bar, followed by a Greggs-inspired pub.

Mumbai: Godrej Industries launched Godrej Wealth, its wealth management arm on Tuesday, with a target of building ₹1 lakh crore in assets under management (AUM) by 2031. The company said the platform will focus on affluent and high net worth individuals, with investable assets of ₹2 crore and above.

The wealth arm would be part of Godrej Financial Services, which reported a 142.6% increase in consolidated net profit to ₹444 crore from ₹183 crore in the previous year.

“As India’s wealth base expands, there is a growing need for institutions capable of providing long-term financial guidance across generations,” said Pirojsha Godrej, chairperson designate, Godrej Industries Group.

“Godrej group’s legacy and trust would form the foundation of the new wealth management platform,” he said.

Godrej expects wealth management to be a key long-term growth driver for the group’s financial services business. The company also plans to enter the asset management space in the coming years as part of its broader financial services strategy. The listing of the company is expected in the next five years, the executives said.

Mumbai: A plan to cap the dividend earned by stock exchanges, including the country’s largest bourse National Stock Exchange (NSE), from their respective clearing houses is gaining steam.

The proposal, along with a slew of other measures, was discussed in a recent meeting of the committee constituted by the Securities & Exchange Board of India (SEBI) to strengthen the balance-sheets of clearing corporations which play a critical role in the securities markets.

Serving as legal counterparties for clearance and settlement of trades, clearing houses bear the risks on behalf of exchanges.

A senior SEBI official, during an interaction with the committee, has suggested a regulatory ceiling on dividend payout by clearing corporations, two persons familiar with the ongoing deliberations told ET.

Other proposals examined by the panel headed by R.S.Gandhi, former deputy governor of the Reserve Bank of India, are: (1) directly crediting the interest earned by a clearing corporation from investments of the cash collateral (it receives from members) in treasury bills and government securities to the settlement guarantee funds (SGF); the fund, held by a clearing house, acts as a cash buffer to take care of contingencies arising from payment default of top stock brokers; at present, the income from these risk-free investments goes into the books of the clearing corporations; (2) exchanges sharing a bigger slice of the transaction charges collected from member brokers with clearing corporations; currently, a predominant portion of the transaction charge is retained by the exchanges unlike the practice in advanced markets;(3) framing a uniform rule for calculation of SGF across exchanges – while the NSE clearing corporation holds adequate SGF to handle the default of top 3 brokers, some of the other exchanges have a cover of 2 in the absence of any regulation. “There is no standard regulation on how the SGF would be replenished if the fund shrinks due to defaults in the market. Unlike the CCIL, there is no laid down procedure on this in stock market,” said a securities market professional. CCIL, or the Clearing Corporation of India, is the qualified central counterparty for trades in government bonds, foreign exchange, money market instruments, and derivatives like inter-rate swaps.

“While NSE has significantly contributed to the SGF following SEBI’s directions, there are no structured regulations on how funds would be raised. Besides, listed exchange could require shareholders’ permission and meetings before making such fund commitments,” said a source. Similarly, though the quantum of dividend paid by clearing corporations is not large, there is a feeling that a rule on limiting future dividend distribution by a crucial market infrastructure institution would help as trading volume grows.
However, all this may call for a balancing act. “The SGF cannot be touched – money flowing into the fund cannot be pulled out. If all interest earnings are credited to SGF, one must factor in the possibility of the fund becoming larger than required. Instead, if the earnings or a part of it, goes to the clearing corporation, there would be greater flexibility in utilising the money in future,” said an exchange official. The entire exercise has assumed significance as financials of clearing corporations and SGFs cannot be fortified through higher transaction charges that could put off investors. “That the issues have to be addressed is widely accepted. But, since it concerns the entire industry, there is no compulsion to finalise the rules before the NSE IPO,” said another person.

The House of Lords has told the Bank of England and the FCA to keep to their timetable on stablecoin regulation, arguing that further delay will hand the digital payments race to Washington and Brussels, and shut British SMEs out of a fast-moving market.

Britain’s stablecoin moment has, in the view of peers, finally arrived, and the regulators must not fluff it. In a report published this week under the unsentimental title Stablecoins: waiting for regulation, the cross-party House of Lords Financial Services Regulation Committee has urged the Bank of England, the Financial Conduct Authority and HM Treasury to stick rigidly to their published timetable, warning that any slippage will entrench the dominance of dollar-backed tokens and leave UK challenger banks, payment firms and small businesses on the wrong side of an emerging global infrastructure.

The committee, chaired by the Conservative peer Baroness Noakes DBE, was unsparing in its assessment of how far the UK has fallen behind. “The global stablecoin market is dominated by US dollar stablecoins and evolved to serve cryptoasset trading,” she said. “New uses for stablecoins are emerging and regulators globally are setting up regulatory regimes. The UK is lagging behind compared with the US and the EU but is now moving in the right direction.” The message to Threadneedle Street and Stratford was, in effect: get on with it.

A sterling stablecoin, a digital token pegged one-for-one to the pound and backed by safe, liquid assets, is presented in the report as a genuine opportunity for the City and for the wider economy. Peers point to faster, cheaper settlement, programmable payments that could automate routine SME treasury tasks, and a broader stablecoin services ecosystem that could generate fee income for British banks, custodians and fintechs. With the UK’s existing depth in capital markets and a mature regulatory culture, a credible GBP token could find a willing audience well beyond the crypto trading floor.

But the committee is equally candid about the risks. Stablecoins, peers warn, carry implications for financial stability, the disintermediation of traditional deposit-takers and the protection of consumers who may not fully understand what sits behind a digital token. The use of stablecoins for illicit finance, particularly via unhosted, self-custody wallets, is highlighted as a serious global concern that British policymakers cannot wish away.

The committee broadly supports the approach taken in the Bank of England’s November consultation on a regulatory regime for sterling-denominated systemic stablecoins, including the principle that issuers must hold backing assets one-for-one and the offer of a Bank backstop lending facility. What worries peers is the fine print.

Three areas in particular drew sharp criticism. First, the Bank’s proposal that systemic issuers hold at least 40 per cent of their backing assets in unremunerated deposits at Threadneedle Street, which the committee says risks making the UK regime “an international outlier” and a commercially unattractive one at that. Second, the suggestion that pre-emptive holding limits be imposed on stablecoin balances, which peers fear could throttle a market before it has had a chance to demonstrate either its risks or its uses. Third, the proposed restrictions on commercial banks issuing stablecoins under their own branding through ordinary subsidiaries, which the report says could shut high-street lenders out of an obvious adjacent market.

The committee’s preferred approach is what it terms a “use-case agnostic” framework: rules robust enough to mitigate financial stability and consumer protection risks, but flexible enough that they do not pre-judge which applications, wholesale settlement, e-commerce, cross-border B2B payments, micro-transactions, will turn out to matter. Crucially, peers warn the Bank and FCA not to apply “a more severe risk lens” to stablecoins than they do to existing payment rails. That is a pointed reminder that card networks, faster payments and correspondent banking carry risks of their own that have long been managed rather than designed out.

For small and medium-sized businesses, the practical stakes are considerable. Programmable sterling tokens could automate supplier payments, settle export invoices in seconds rather than days, and remove a layer of foreign-exchange and intermediary cost that currently sits between British exporters and overseas customers. Peers’ insistence on regulatory certainty matters because, without it, UK fintechs developing those tools are likely to redomicile or build on dollar rails, a familiar story for anyone who watched the debate over Britain’s ambition to compete with the US as a global crypto hub play out over recent years.

The FCA, meanwhile, is pressing on with a broader conduct regime for digital assets, against the backdrop of falling retail crypto ownership and rising institutional interest, as our recent coverage of the regulator’s preparations for new digital asset rules noted. The Lords’ report is, in effect, an attempt to make sure the prudential and conduct workstreams reinforce rather than undermine each other.

The most pointed political signal in the report concerns unhosted wallets, self-custody digital wallets that sit outside the regulated perimeter and have become a focus of anti-money-laundering attention in both Washington and Brussels. Peers have asked HM Treasury, working with the Bank and the FCA, to assess whether existing UK law is sufficient to detect and deter their misuse, and have explicitly invited ministers to legislate to restrict their use if it is not. That is a notable shift in tone for a committee otherwise inclined towards encouraging innovation, and reflects how seriously Westminster is now taking the illicit-finance risks brought into sharp relief by the Trump administration’s enthusiastic embrace of the sector, as charted in our reporting on the US ‘crypto week’ and the rise of bank-issued stablecoins.

The Lords’ message is straightforward, even if the underlying regime is anything but. The UK has a narrow window in which to set rules that are credible, competitive and durable. Get the calibration wrong on backing assets, holding limits or bank participation and a sterling stablecoin market will simply fail to emerge, ceding ground to MiCA-compliant euro tokens and an increasingly liberal US regime. Get it right and Britain has a genuine shot at hosting a stablecoin ecosystem that serves not only City wholesale markets but the wider SME economy that depends on cheap, fast and reliable payments.

As Baroness Noakes put it: “Regulation needs to allow innovation while ensuring that risks are effectively mitigated. The shape of any UK stablecoin market will be strongly influenced by the direction of the regulatory regime, and so it is important that the regulators get this balance right.”

Further details of the inquiry, including the full report and the evidence submitted by industry, are available on the UK Parliament’s Financial Services Regulation Committee page.

---