Indian corporates sharply reduced overseas bond issuances in FY26 even as domestic debt markets remained resilient, reflecting a clear pivot toward local funding amid elevated global interest rates and currency volatility. Last fiscal, the rupee lost nearly 10%-the most in 14 years.

Data from Cbonds, a financial data provider, showed offshore bond fundraising fell to $8.1 billion in FY26, down from $13.9 billion a year earlier, a nearly 40% decline. In contrast, domestic bond issuances held steady at ₹12.32 lakh crore during April-February FY26, compared with ₹12.97 lakh crore in FY25.

“Offshore borrowing has come down largely due to geopolitical uncertainty and volatility,” said Utsav Johri, partner, JSA Advocates & Solicitors. “While the recent relaxations in ECB guidelines make the market look promising and could drive a pickup later in the year once conditions stabilise, issuers are currently holding back. Hedging costs are elevated and expose borrowers to currency risk, and with ample liquidity available in the domestic market, companies are not keen to tap offshore markets at this stage.”
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) recently relaxed norms for external commercial borrowings (ECB), raising limits to $1 billion, easing maturity requirements and removing caps on borrowing costs. The changes are aimed at making offshore funding more accessible and cost-effective.

Last fiscal, abundant liquidity in the domestic market and relatively attractive borrowing costs encouraged companies to stay onshore. “Rates in the local market were in the 7-8% range, and there was ample liquidity. That reduced the need to tap offshore markets,” a senior banker said.
The trend was also due to currency pressures. The rupee weakened amid global uncertainties, including tariff-related disruptions, making unhedged foreign currency exposure riskier. As a result, several corporates opted to refinance existing dollar liabilities through rupee bonds.Large issuers such as Greenko and Vedanta have already tapped domestic markets to refinance foreign currency debt, showing a shift toward local borrowing.

This trend is likely to persist in the near term.

“There is not a very active offshore pipeline right now. Companies are holding back on large commitments and closely watching global developments, including geopolitical risks and their impact on costs and growth,” another banker said.

Issuance activity in offshore markets has also become more selective, largely confined to investment-grade borrowers, while high-yield issuers face tighter conditions. Some diversification into alternative markets has emerged, with companies exploring currencies such as yen, though such issuances are limited.

If global conditions stabilise, issuers with upcoming maturities, particularly large public sector borrowers, could return to overseas markets to refinance debt, bankers said.

Morgan Harper, a director at the non-profit economic advocacy organisation American Economic Liberties Project, called the verdict against Live Nation “a historic victory for fans, artists, concert promoters and venue owners who have suffered for decades under the thumb of Ticketmaster’s monopoly”.

This article was written by

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha’s Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Multi-asset funds that combine equities, gold and fixed income are designed to smooth portfolio volatility, but their role extends beyond just reducing drawdowns. Over the past 16 years, actively managed multi-asset portfolios have outperformed domestic equities, delivering an annualised return of 11.4% compared with 10.7% for the BSE Sensex TRI, or Total Returns Index, according to a study by WhiteOak Capital.

The strategy has, however, lagged higher-returning asset classes such as gold and global equities, with 14.7% and 18.6% annualised returns, respectively, over the same period. “How gold, equity or debt behaves in isolation is very different from how a well-constructedcombination performs,” said Aashish Sommaiyaa, ED & CEO, WhiteOak Capital Mutual Fund.

The study analysed a model portfolio allocating 25% to the BSE Sensex TRI, 45% to the CRISIL Short Term Bond Index, 25% to gold (MCX) and 5% to the S&P 500 TRI, with annual rebalancing. The key trade-off is consistency. The multi-asset portfolio did not post a loss in any calendar year, compared with domestic equities, international equities and gold, which recorded losses in four, one and two years, respectively.

In a multi-asset portfolio, gold helped offset equity weakness through FY25 and into FY26. While equities underperformed after September 2024, with the Sensex TRI gaining 6.4% in FY25 and shedding 6% in FY26, gold’s run-up of 32% and 65% in these two financial years on safe-haven demand provided a counterbalance, driving overall portfolio returns.

This has boosted the popularity of multi-asset allocation funds, which have garnered ₹65,210 crore, or 62% of net inflows in the hybrid category, in 2025–26. Though allocations to various assets vary depending on the fund houses, investors are taking comfort in their stable returns compared to the wild swings in equities.
“Many investors get scared of equity, especially when drawdowns like March happen, and they lose two years of returns in a short time frame,” said Vineet Nanda, founder, SIFT Capital. “In such times, people holding pure equity funds tend to lose patience and opt for multi-asset products.”“A big advantage is the scheme rebalances assets at regular intervals with no tax implication for the investor,” said Juzer Gabajiwala, director, Ventura Securities.