Connect with us

Business

LARRY KUDLOW: How about a Reagan-style reconciliation tax cut? All right?

Published

on

LARRY KUDLOW: GOP must message better to win the midterms

Now, in case you didn’t see it, please rush out, get today’s Wall Street Journal, and read James Freeman’s fabulous column: “How about Reagan-Style Reconciliation?” All right. I was there as a young man, deputy in the Office of Management and Budget, and it’s all music to my ears.

Basically, President Reagan’s tax cut magic. The first major vote was roughly 45 years ago, July, 1981. Reagan’s big tax cut bill passed the House by 238 to 195 votes. It was a Democratic House, remember that. A bit later by the by, the Senate would pass it 89 to 11. It was a Republican Senate.

The Gipper signed the legislation at his ranch that August. Now, this was absolutely the key element to the Reagan revolution, which was a supply-side revolution, which basically argued that you lower taxes to promote growth, jobs, wages, wealth, and a strong national security. Reagan’s tax cuts brought joy and prosperity to a whole nation desperately in need of both. 

Advertisement

Now, as Art Laffer puts it, if you tax something less, you get more of it. You tax the whole economy less as Reagan did, and the economic pie grew larger and larger.  In other words, incentives matter. If you keep more of what you earn, you’re going to work harder, invest more, take more risks, and the economy grew. Those 1981 tax cuts helped the economy roar. With real growth of about 5.5 percent per year for more than seven years during Ronald Reagan’s two terms. 

The stock market roared, as did jobs, and frankly, the whole national morale roared. It was so demoralized during the Carter years, but under Reagan, the animal spirits and the happiness indexes just jumped off the page. And the enormous growth in the American economy created the resources that ultimately Mr. Reagan used to destroy Soviet communism. Peace through strength was an integral part of supply side economics. Mr. Freeman does a wonderful job of reminding all of us of the phenomenal benefits of Mr. Reagan’s supply side tax cuts.

And yes, Mr. Laffer’s curve, the famous Laffer Curve, where he suggested that lower tax rates would produce higher tax revenues with more economic growth and less tax avoidance. Well, it worked out very well. The revenue base actually jumped by almost 25 percent during the whole Reagan boom.

Advertisement

Now, remember, Tip O’Neill was the liberal Democratic speaker. He opposed the Reagan tax cuts, but he got rolled. In the House, 48 Democrats voted for Reagan, who himself, by the way, started out in politics as a Democrat.

What a list of tax cuts. The 25 percent income tax was the headline led by the late Jack Kemp. There were lower taxes on marriage, estates, inheritance, capital gains, interest, dividends, savings, retirements, and businesses. Oh my God. And it worked.

The tax cut magic worked. So I’ll just say, why not remember those days 45 years ago? I remember it very well. How about the Republicans today, thinking about the midterms, but more importantly, thinking about our whole national economy, our whole morale, our whole happiness, our national security. These are things that are helped and virtually solved by lower tax rates across the board.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Business

Peruvian ex-president Humala released from prison after court overturns conviction

Published

on


Peruvian ex-president Humala released from prison after court overturns conviction

Continue Reading

Business

Our commitment for press freedom, and autonomy of public broadcast is absolute: Prakash Javadekar

Published

on

ET Logo
Minister of state (independent charge) for information and broadcasting, environment and climate change Prakash Javadekar has been busy sorting out the various hats he’s expected to wear in this government.

He spoke to ET on the Bharatiya Janata Party government’s approach towards media, social media, media controls and much more. Edited excerpts…

In terms of communication and messaging, the BJP’s electoral campaign has been termed an object lesson in the field. How can you translate that into the governmental structure?

All communication needs of the government will be handled in our ministry through a social media hub. I am offering this service to all ministers. Their facebook, twitter and other social media outreach will be handled by the new media wing, and the social media and communication hub.

Advertisement

The advantage that the party saw in reaching out through all communication media has been tremendous, and it was felt that the government too use the available platforms. Therefore, this new hub will provide all the help needed by various ministers and ministries for setting up and operating their facebook pages, twitter handles and the outreach throughsocial media. Traditional media is important, of course, but social media vehicles have to be spruced up.

What are your priority areas as far as this (I&B) ministry is concerned?