Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Business

Regulator’s concerns pertain to pockets of speculation, not entire derivatives market: Tuhin Kanta Pandey

Published

on

Regulator's concerns pertain to pockets of speculation, not entire derivatives market: Tuhin Kanta Pandey
Future steps to reduce excessive speculation in equity derivatives would be guided by careful data analysis and a balanced, mature approach, Tuhin Kanta Pandey, chairperson, Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi), tells Reena Zachariah and Nishanth Vasudevan.

Pandey, who completes his first year as the head of India’s capital markets regulator, said the recent measures by Sebi were not aimed at the entire derivatives market but at pockets of speculation in the segment. The Sebi chief also spoke on settlement regulations and promoter norms, among other issues. Edited excerpts:

You’ve said your goal is to keep policies market-friendly as the ecosystem evolves. Are you satisfied with the progress so far?

Advertisement

Broadly, yes. Within Sebi, there is a growing emphasis on what I would call optimum regulation. We recognise that regulation has costs and can create unintended consequences. Where multiple options achieve the same objective, we should choose the simpler one with lower compliance costs. Over time, rules tend to accumulate, increasing compliance burdens for both regulated entities and the regulator. Our comprehensive regulatory review aims to rationalise and streamline this. Ultimately, investor protection and market development must go together.

Over the past two years, Sebi has taken several steps to curb excessive speculation in equity derivatives. Is there a measure or a level that you are targeting at which you would consider that the objective has been achieved? Are you following a number-driven or principle-driven approach?
We are not following a number-driven approach. Our approach is principle-driven. The focus has been on assessing the impact of the measures we’ve introduced. Often, finfluencers highlight only the winners, creating an exaggerated perception of returns. By placing collective data in the public domain, we aimed to present a realistic view of outcomes in the market. Transparency itself is a powerful form of investor education. We also introduced safeguards such as tighter margin norms, especially on expiry days, to curb lottery-like speculation. Now, we need to assess the impact of these steps through data, rather than reacting month to month. We must recognise that there are also genuine, informed participants in the derivatives market. The objective is not to shut down the market, but to ensure it operates responsibly. Future steps, if any, will be guided by careful data analysis and a balanced, mature approach.

Some market participants warn that India should avoid the path taken by countries such as China and South Korea, where curbs on derivatives speculation have led to a loss of liquidity that has been hard to restore. Has Sebi factored in the risk of liquidity leaving the market as a result of its recent measures?

It is too sweeping to treat the entire F&O segment as one block. Derivatives play a vital role in price discovery, hedging, and risk management, which is why they exist globally. Our concerns were not about the broader derivatives market, but about short-tenor index options, particularly weekly and expiry-day contracts, where speculative activity had become concentrated. If there is a problem in one area, the response should address that area, not disrupt the entire system. There are multiple viewpoints on this – some argue weekly options should continue unchanged, others warn about liquidity risks, and some suggest calibrated measures such as eligibility criteria. The objective is to address concentrated risks while preserving the overall role and liquidity of the derivatives market. So there is, in my opinion, a need even for the media not to really call it F&O, and rather to coin it as ‘O’ on the expiry day and weekly.
So, just to be clear, your concern about derivatives is the pocket of speculation rather than the broader segment.
Yes. You can’t start badgering your body just because you have a boil on your nose. There are several views, like it should continue or let’s get out of weekly, or can we have something in between. There are people who are talking about what kind of criteria could be made for access, for example. Collectively, we should be comfortable that this is the right approach to take. Has Sebi discussed the topic of access (eligibility to trade) in F&O?
No, I’m not saying that. All I am saying is these are already different points of view. F&O has been one of the most hotly debated subjects. All I am saying is please don’t call it F&O, and if you have a problem, call it ‘O’ on the expiry date.

There are also some concerns over growing speculation through margin trading facility (MTF) exposures. Is Sebi looking into this?
We continuously monitor the situation, but MTF already operates within defined guardrails. There are net worth requirements and leverage limits. We have taken the view that re-pledging of client securities for additional leverage should not lead to over-leveraging. At this stage, we believe MTF should be allowed to function within these guardrails while keeping risks under watch. Liquidity in the cash market is important, and we are examining ways to deepen it. For instance, a working group is reviewing the short-selling and SLBM framework to understand barriers and encourage broader participation. Derivatives and cash markets must function together. Derivatives, particularly longer-tenor contracts, play an essential role in price discovery and hedging. The key is to ensure appropriate position limits and risk controls so that excessive speculation is contained and markets remain stable.

Advertisement

Sebi is reviewing its settlement regulations. While settlements have increased over time, litigation and case backlogs remain high. Are further simplifications being considered?
Yes. Greater clarity and proportionality are needed in settlement regulations. Clearer rules reduce ambiguity, limit multiple interpretations, and help bring down disputes and litigation. We do not want the system to become a ‘litigation paradise’. Simpler, clearer rules ultimately strengthen market confidence.

How is Sebi rethinking the concept of promoter, particularly, under ICDR (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements), after moving away from the ‘once a promoter, always a promoter’ approach?
The review is not limited to ICDR. We are also examining LODR (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements). A working group is gathering feedback, and the proposals will go through multiple committees before consultation papers are issued.

There are concerns that some companies report profits just before an IPO and then slip back into losses, raising allegations of window-dressing. How does Sebi view this?

It is important not to generalise from a few instances. One egregious case does not indicate a systemic problem. The key is to distinguish between isolated misconduct and a broader pattern. Rushing to introduce additional rules in response to individual cases risks overregulation and could burden compliant companies without solving the underlying issue.

Advertisement

Sebi is reportedly issuing notices to lawyers and tax consultants for alleged confidentiality breaches during M&A deals. Do you foresee jurisdictional or enforcement challenges, given that they are also regulated by other professional bodies?
If the investigation finds evidence of a violation, the matter proceeds to a quasi-judicial process within Sebi. A show-cause notice is issued, and the concerned parties are given an opportunity to respond and be heard before any order is passed. The outcome may confirm, modify, or set aside the investigation’s findings. These orders are subject to appeal before the Securities Appellate Tribunal.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Business

Pfizer Lyme disease vaccine fails trial, company to seek FDA approval

Published

on

Pfizer Lyme disease vaccine fails trial, company to seek FDA approval

A tick (Ixodida) – carrier for several diseases of humans and animals, for exampel the dangerous Lyme disease, babesiosis, anaplasmosis, Powassan virus disease and many more.

Fhm | Moment | Getty Images

Pfizer on Monday said it will seek regulatory approval for a Lyme disease vaccine candidate despite the shot failing a late-stage trial.

Advertisement

Pfizer said the vaccine missed the trial’s statistical goal because not enough people in the study contracted Lyme disease to be confident in the results. Still, the company said the shot reduced the rate of infection by more than 70% in people who received the vaccine versus placebo, efficacy the company thinks is strong enough to take to regulators.

“The efficacy shown in the VALOR study of more than 70% is highly encouraging and creates confidence in the vaccine’s potential to protect against this disease that can be debilitating,” Pfizer Chief Vaccines Officer Annaliesa Anderson said in a statement.

A vaccine for Lyme disease isn’t expected to become a best-seller for Pfizer, with the company’s partner Valneva estimating peak annual sales of $1 billion. Pfizer expects overall revenue of around $60 billion this year, with its Covid-19 vaccine representing more than $5 billion of that forecast.

But Pfizer had billed the Lyme vaccine results as one of its major catalysts this year, and it represented a chance to introduce the only human vaccine for Lyme disease.

Advertisement

Moving forward with a shot that technically failed a clinical trial under an administration that has preached stricter scrutiny for vaccines may prove risky for Pfizer, and it could serve as a litmus test for vaccine policy in the U.S.

Lyme disease is an illness caused by bacteria most commonly spread to humans from ticks. It can cause arthritis, muscle weakness and pain. About half a million Americans are diagnosed with or treated for Lyme disease every year, according to estimates from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Despite the disease’s prevalence, especially in the Northeast, there isn’t a vaccine for humans available. A company that would later become GSK introduced a shot called LYMErix in 1998 but pulled it only a few years later after public concerns about safety tanked demand. That experience hobbled development of Lyme vaccines for humans, though multiple companies now make them for dogs.

Pfizer and Valneva have faced their own setbacks. In 2023, the companies dropped about half of the participants in the Phase 3 trial because of quality concerns with third-party clinical trial site operator Care Access. The trial had initially enrolled about 18,000 people and after the cuts ended up with about 9,400.

Advertisement

The companies’ vaccine targets the outer surface protein A of the bacteria that cause Lyme disease. A vaccinated person creates antibodies that are passed to a tick and prevent the bacterium from being transferred from the tick to the human. The series involves three shots in the first year, then a booster dose the following year.

The companies said they didn’t observe any safety concerns in the trial.

Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.
Continue Reading

Business

How Companies Are Cutting Back On CAPEX By Leasing Infrastructure On Demand

Published

on

Maven Capital Partners has invested £2.6 million in PowerPhotonic, the precision optics specialist whose technology underpins high-power laser systems used in aerospace, defence, healthcare and semiconductor manufacturing.

Capital expenditure has been a huge obstacle for companies that rely on a lot of heavy equipment or infrastructure. Construction, logistics, mining and manufacturing firms have traditionally gone out and bought the gear they need in order to keep running.

While owning the gear gives them control, it also locks up a ton of capital, piles on maintenance bills, and leaves them exposed to the risk of underutilising their assets when they’re not in use.

A big shift is going on right now. Across multiple sectors, companies are moving away from the old model of buying and owning big-ticket assets and are instead turning to on-demand access to the gear and infrastructure they need. This change is revolutionising how capital is allocated in these businesses, and how they manage their risks.

The Problem with Being a Capital-Heavy Business

Ownership used to be seen as a necessity in industries where having access to that gear was essential to getting the job done. Contractors buy excavators, transport companies buy truck fleets, and manufacturers build extra capacity so they can meet demand without relying on outside help.

But this model creates a whole host of problems:

Advertisement
  • You need to shell out loads of cash upfront to buy the gear.
  • The gear depreciates quickly, leaving you with a fraction of what you paid for it after just a few years.
  • There are ongoing costs for maintenance and storage on top of that.
  • You’re stuck with the gear even when you don’t need it – which is a waste of money.
  • And there’s the risk that you’ll buy a lot of gear and then struggle to use it all when demand drops.

In reality, loads of companies end up with gear that’s not being used very much. That equipment bought for peak demand just sits there idle between projects or during downturns, which means you’re throwing good money after bad on cash that’s not really generating any value.

This is getting worse as margins get tighter, competition gets fiercer, and the pressure to get your capital allocation just right gets more intense.

The Shift Towards Access Over Ownership

So, to get around these problems, companies are starting to adopt the “access over ownership” model. Instead of buying gear that may not even get used all that much, businesses are turning to leasing or renting the equipment and infrastructure they need on demand.

This model is already well established in other areas. Cloud computing made it so that you don’t need to have all the IT hardware lying around on site. Mobility platforms let people use cars without having to buy them. And the same idea is being applied to physical gear and infrastructure now.

In construction, for example, contractors are ditching their own fleets and instead using hired gear to do the job. They keep a core set of assets that they own and use, and then rent or lease the rest as needed for specific projects or phases.

Advertisement

This way, businesses can match their spending to their actual needs.

What Are the Financial Benefits of On-Demand Infrastructure?

One of the key benefits to this approach is that it lets you cut back on capital expenditure. By not having to shell out a fortune upfront to buy the gear, you can keep your capital free for other important priorities like expansion, updating your tech, or hiring more staff.

Some of the key financial benefits are:

  • You don’t need to throw down loads of cash upfront to buy some new gear.
  • Your cash flow is more predictable, because you’re only paying for the gear when you need it.
  • You avoid all the depreciation costs that come from owning stuff that’s not generating a good return for you.
  • You save on maintenance and storage costs.
  • And your operating expenses become more predictable, which makes it easier to budget and plan.

By treating access to equipment as an operational expense, rather than a capital expense, you get more flexibility and can respond better to changing market conditions.

How On-Demand Infrastructure Improves Asset Utilisation

Another huge problem with the old model is that you end up with a lot of underused assets. Some gear gets used a lot, while other stuff just sits there idle for ages. This reduces your overall return on investment and makes it more expensive to get the job done.

Advertisement

But if you lease or rent the gear you need on demand, you can match your usage to your needs more closely. The gear is used when you need it, and then it’s back on the market when you don’t.

This approach also means you can get access to the specialist gear you need for specific tasks, without having to buy it and then stick it in a warehouse somewhere.

It Lets You Be More Flexible and Scalable

In today’s business world, demand can change overnight. Project pipelines can go up or down, timelines get changed, and market conditions shift. And in that kind of environment, having the flexibility to scale up or down quickly is a huge advantage.

On-demand infrastructure lets you scale your operations without being tied to a fixed asset base. If demand goes up, you can get more gear to meet the demand – and if demand drops, you can cut back and save yourself some cash.

Advertisement

And that’s especially useful in construction, where different projects need different types and volumes of gear at different times.

Digital platforms are making it all a lot easier to track down and get access to the gear you need. Platforms like Quotor give you a view of what’s out there, so you can find the gear you need without having to buy it yourself.

Reducing the Risk of Uncertain Markets

Finally, on-demand infrastructure reduces the long-term risk of buying a lot of gear that may not get used as much as you thought. In industries where the market is volatile – and that’s a lot of industries right now – the risk of buying gear in a boom and then having it go unused in a bust is a real problem.

But if you’re only leasing or renting the gear you need, you’re not committing to anything long-term. You can adjust your resource usage as the market changes – which means you can avoid the costs of maintaining gear that’s not being used.

Advertisement

This risk reduction is getting more and more important as industries have to deal with all the volatility in the market right now.

Technology is Making It All Happen

At the end of the day, all this is being made possible by the rapid advancement of digital technology. Online platforms, data analysis and real-time tracking are all making it easier for businesses to find, compare and access the resources they need.These technologies are making it a lot clearer where you can find the equipment you need and how much it’s going to set you back, which lets companies make decisions alot faster and with alot more info. And to top it off, they just make it a lot easier to get the equipment you need from multiple suppliers without all the hassle that’s usually involved.

As more and more businesses get on board with digital technology, on-demand infrastructure is going to become a whole lot more integrated into how it’s done in the industry, especially in places where equipment is a big deal.

A Shift in How Companies Approach Capital

The idea of on-demand infrastructure is part of a much bigger change in how companies think about capital – rather than just tying up their cash in physical assets they are really starting to value things like flexibility, efficiency, and being able to adapt quickly.

Advertisement

This shift doesn’t mean they aren’t going to own any assets anymore. Lots of companies are still going to have the equipment that really matters to them right up front. But the balance is shifting. People are getting pickier about what they own, and instead they are using access models to fill in the gaps and handle the day to day things that are hard to predict.

In construction this is a pretty fundamental change in how equipment is sourced & used.

Wrap Up

Cutting capital costs with on-demand infrastructure is more than just being cheap – it’s a way for companies to respond to the problems with the way they used to own things, and the fact that things are moving really fast.

By moving from owning things outright to accessing them as you need them, companies can do all sorts of good things like get their equipment running most of the time, reduce how much money they lose to financial risks, and use their capital in some place where it’ll get a better return. As more and more platforms for digital stuff get built out, this model is just going to keep on growing in the asset-intensive industries.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Business

Mondelez unveils two new Clif energy products

Published

on

Mondelez unveils two new Clif energy products

Company adds energy bites.

Continue Reading

Business

Danone adding meal solution provider to portfolio

Published

on

Danone adding meal solution provider to portfolio

Huel has raised approximately $59 million in venture capital funding. 

Continue Reading

Business

Hormel highlights five pizza trends

Published

on

Hormel highlights five pizza trends

Trends include meat and specialty crusts.

Continue Reading

Business

Welch’s hits goal to remove artificial dyes from snacks

Published

on

Welch’s hits goal to remove artificial dyes from snacks

The fruit snacks no longer contain colors such as Red No. 40 or Blue No. 1.

Continue Reading

Business

The Best House Buying Companies in the UK (2026): A Business Perspective

Published

on

The UK housing market is set for a subdued year, as both Savills and Rightmove cut their forecasts for house price growth in 2025, reflecting a combination of weak buyer activity, rising property supply, and lingering geopolitical uncertainty.

The UK property market continues to evolve, with increasing demand for speed, certainty and flexibility driving growth in the fast house sale sector.

House buying companies — often referred to as cash property buyers — have become a significant part of the market, offering homeowners an alternative to traditional estate agent sales. For many sellers, particularly those facing time pressure, these companies provide a streamlined route to completion.

However, the sector is far from uniform. Business models vary widely, from direct cash purchasers to hybrid platforms reliant on investor networks. As a result, understanding which companies deliver consistently is key.

Below is a business-focused overview of some of the leading house buying companies operating in the UK in 2026, based on scale, structure and market presence.

1. Springbok Properties

A scaled operator with structured sales models

Springbok Properties

Advertisement

is one of the most established and recognisable companies in the UK fast-sale property sector.

From a business standpoint, what differentiates Springbok is its multi-route sales model. Rather than relying on a single acquisition method, the company offers a range of structured solutions designed to align with different seller priorities — including speed, price and certainty.

This operational flexibility allows Springbok to handle higher volumes of transactions while maintaining relatively consistent completion timelines.

The company has also built significant brand equity, supported by a large volume of customer reviews and a strong digital presence.

Advertisement

Business strengths

  • Nationwide operational scale
  • Structured, multi-channel sales model
  • Strong brand recognition and review footprint
  • Ability to process high transaction volumes

For sellers and investors alike, Springbok represents one of the more mature and systemised operators within the sector.

2. The Property Buying Company

Direct acquisition model with strong market visibility

The Property Buying Company operates primarily as a direct purchaser, which simplifies the transaction process and reduces reliance on third-party buyers.

From a business perspective, this model offers clarity and speed, making it attractive to sellers seeking straightforward transactions.

The company has invested heavily in marketing, giving it strong visibility within the UK property sector.

Business strengths

  • Direct buying model
  • Clear and simple transaction structure
  • Strong brand awareness

However, as with most direct buyers, pricing is closely tied to valuation models and risk assessment.

3. Good Move

Compliance-led positioning in a lightly regulated sector

Good Move has positioned itself as a regulated house buying company, emphasising transparency and adherence to industry standards.

Advertisement

In a sector where regulation is still evolving, this approach provides a degree of differentiation and appeals to sellers seeking reassurance.

From a business standpoint, Good Move’s focus on compliance reflects a broader trend toward professionalisation within the fast-sale market.

Business strengths

  • Compliance-focused positioning
  • Transparent communication processes
  • Alignment with industry bodies

4. Property Solvers

Hybrid model with investor integration

Property Solvers operates using a hybrid approach, combining direct purchasing with access to an investor network.

This model allows the company to offer flexibility, matching sellers with different types of buyers depending on the property and circumstances.

From a business perspective, hybrid models can increase deal flow but may introduce variability in timelines and pricing.

Advertisement

Business strengths

  • Flexible acquisition strategy
  • Access to investor capital
  • Nationwide coverage

5. WeBuyAnyHome

Brand-led growth within the fast-sale sector

WeBuyAnyHome is one of the most recognisable brands in the UK quick-sale property market, driven largely by its marketing strategy and national reach.

The company focuses on generating high volumes of enquiries through a simplified onboarding process.

While brand strength is a clear advantage, the underlying transaction model often depends on investor participation.

Business strengths

  • Strong national brand presence
  • High lead generation capacity
  • Streamlined enquiry process

Sector Insights: A Market in Transition

The growth of house buying companies reflects broader structural changes within the UK property market.

Key trends include:

  • Increased demand for chain-free transactions
  • Rising adoption of PropTech and digital workflows
  • Greater awareness of alternative selling routes
  • A shift toward speed and certainty over maximum price

As a result, the sector is becoming more competitive, with companies refining their models to improve efficiency and conversion rates.

Key Considerations for Sellers

From a business and consumer perspective, due diligence remains essential.

Advertisement

Sellers should assess:

  • Whether the company is a direct buyer or intermediary
  • The transparency of the valuation process
  • Evidence of completed transactions and reviews
  • Membership of recognised industry bodies

Understanding these factors can help mitigate risk and ensure a smoother transaction.

Conclusion

House buying companies have established themselves as a viable and growing segment of the UK property market.

While the sector includes a wide range of operators, companies such as Springbok Properties, The Property Buying Company and Good Move demonstrate how scale, structure and transparency can differentiate businesses in an increasingly competitive landscape.

As market conditions continue to evolve, the demand for fast, reliable property transactions is likely to remain strong — ensuring that house buying companies play an increasingly important role in the future of UK real estate.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Business

Celldex Therapeutics stock hits 52-week high at 32.8 USD

Published

on


Celldex Therapeutics stock hits 52-week high at 32.8 USD

Continue Reading

Business

Wales needs to deliver more than 10,000 a year to hit government target

Published

on

Business Live

Lichfields has published comparative figures to the previous Welsh Government measure including the backlog in unbuilt homes.

Builder working on roof of a partially constructed house.

House building.(Image: Rui Vieira/PA Wire)

Wales may need to deliver more than 10,600 homes a year over the next five years if it match the Welsh Government’s latest housing need figures on a comparable basis, according to new analysis from planning and development consultancy Lichfields.

The Welsh Government’s updated estimates of housing need, published in February, identify a central requirement of around 8,700 homes per year between 2025 and 2030. That is already well above recent delivery levels, with housing completions averaging around 5,000 homes a year and 4,631 delivered in 2024/25.

READ MORE: The latest appointments in Welsh business

However, Lichfields’ review shows that the way the new figures are presented differs from the approach taken in 2019. The latest estimates separate newly arising need from the existing backlog of unmet need, currently identified as 9,400 households.

Advertisement

In 2019, that backlog was factored into the first five years of the plan period. If the same method were applied to the new dataset, the annual requirement for 2025–2030 would equate to 10,620 homes per year – a 43% increase on a like-for-like basis.

The updated figures also suggest a shift in the balance of housing required. For the next five years, the central estimate indicates around 65% market housing and 35% affordable housing.

Gareth Williams, senior Director at Lichfields, said: “Even the central estimate of 8,700 homes a year represents a significant uplift on recent delivery. On a comparable basis with the previous methodology, the annual requirement would exceed 10,600 homes.

“That gap between identified need and actual delivery is substantial. There is an urgent need for planning policy reform to ensure continuity of housing delivery where Local Development Plans are failing to progress. In our view, this should be a priority for whichever party forms the next Welsh Government after the May elections.”

Advertisement

The analysis also explains that the published estimates should be viewed as a minimum, given the way they have been calculated.

Arwel Evans, planning director at Lichfields’ Cardiff office, added: “The latest household projections will form a key part of the evidence base for regional and local development plans. Authorities bringing forward new or revised plans will need to consider these figures carefully.

“If Wales is to move closer to meeting identified need, there will need to be confidence in land supply, up-to-date plans and a consistent policy framework to support delivery.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Walmart – All-Weather Status Ironically Creates Risk For Investors (NASDAQ:WMT)

Published

on

Walmart - All-Weather Status Ironically Creates Risk For Investors (NASDAQ:WMT)

This article was written by

The Value Investor has a Master of Science with specialization in financial markets and a decade of experience tracking companies via catalytic company events.
As the leader of the investing group Value In Corporate Events they provide members with opportunities to capitalize on IPOs, mergers & acquisitions, earnings reports and changes in corporate capital allocation. Coverage includes 10 major events a month with an eye towards finding the best opportunities. Learn more.

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha’s Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025