Club among objectors to Homes England scheme

A plan for 250 homes in Carnforth has been refused by Lancaster councillors, after fears that it threatened a football club’s activity and wider community needs.

There were also concerns the plan failed to consider reopening a nearby Lancaster Canal marina, and that residents’ cars from the new homes would add to local congestion.

Carnforth Rangers FC was among a number of objectors to the plan by government agency Homes England, for up to 250 houses at the Lundsfield Quarries site, off Kellet Road.

Now, Lancaster City Council’s planning committee (on Monday, March 23) has refused the application, against planning officers’ advice.

Homes England wanted outline planning permission for 250 homes and bought the land after developer Redrow Homes failed to deliver an earlier scheme some years ago, council planning papers said.

The 29-acre site covers the former Lodge Quarry Works bordering the canal south of Carnforth town centre. The football club’s location, Quarry Park, is on the northern edge of the application site.

Neil Wakeman, representing Carnforth Rangers FC trustees, wrote an objection letter to the council, included in planning papers.

He said: “We have real concerns for the incompatibility of football activities with this proposed housing development. This would threaten the viability of improved football facilities in the area.

“A significant shortfall of playing pitches in the Carnforth area has already been identified in Lancaster City Council local plans. Rather than building housing around the existing football ground, we believe all proposals should be considered holistically – together with the community’s sport and footballing needs. Plans for the district should facilitate the expansion of football facilities.”

Carnforth Town Council had also objected. It claimed there has been poor consultation with the community, had worries about traffic congestion and feared the football club would face complaints about disturbance from future residents living in the new homes.

Elsewhere, Lancaster Canal Trust had raised concerns, but not objections. It said the potential loss of canal boat moorings would not encourage a focus for leisure activity in Carnforth. It and the Canal and Rivers Trust also made suggestions to protect the canal infrastructure and its enhance its surrounds.

The Homes England plan included demolition of some existing buildings to build new homes, access and infrastructure. It also proposed a car and coach park for Carnforth Rangers.

Lancaster City Council planning officers had advised councillors to approve the plan with conditions and a legal agreement. Officers said news homes were needed and the canal could be protected.

Their recommendations include having a football club car park with at least 58 spaces and two coach spaces, with long-term security of tenure for the club. Also a contribution by the developers for other sports amenities elsewhere.

Also recommended were affordable homes, new traffic signals on Kellet Road and the developer making a bus service contribution of £500,000. New public space at the housing estate and a management company to maintain open space, roads, landscaping and drainage were also recommended by officers.

But city councillors on the planning committee refused the application.

To find all the planning applications, traffic diversions, road layout changes, alcohol licence applications and more in your community, visit the Public Notices Portal.

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) said on Monday it was banning the import of all new foreign-made consumer routers, a move that comes as the latest crackdown on Chinese-made electronic gear over security concerns.

China is estimated to control at least 60% of the U.S. market for home routers – which are the boxes that connect computers, phones and smart devices to the internet.

The FCC order does not impact the import or use of existing models, but will ban new ones.

The agency said a White House-convened review deemed imported routers pose “a severe cybersecurity risk that could be leveraged to immediately and severely disrupt U.S. critical infrastructure.”

MEDICAL DEVICE GIANT HIT BY GLOBAL NETWORK DISRUPTION AFTER CYBERATTACK POSSIBLY LINKED TO PRO-IRANIAN GROUP

The FCC said that malicious actors had exploited security gaps in foreign-made routers “to attack households, disrupt networks, enable espionage, and facilitate intellectual property theft,” citing their role in major hacks like Volt and Salt Typhoon.

Hackers can exploit consumers’ home internet routers that aren’t properly secured. (Getty Images)

The determination includes an exemption for routers the Pentagon deems do not pose unacceptable risks.

TEXAS GOV ABBOTT ADDS POPULAR CHINESE ELECTRONICS, ONLINE SHOPPING COMPANIES TO ‘PROHIBITED’ TECH LIST

Lawmakers have previously raised security concerns about Chinese-made routers and Michigan Rep. John Moolenaar, the Republican chair of the House select committee on China, praised the FCC order.

“Today’s tremendous decision by the FCC and the Trump administration protects our country against China’s relentless cyberattacks and makes it clear that these devices should be excluded from our critical infrastructure,” Moolenaar said. “Routers are key to keeping us all connected, and we cannot allow Chinese technology to be at the center of that.”

The Chinese Embassy in Washington did not immediately comment.

SILICON VALLEY ENGINEERS CHARGED WITH STEALING GOOGLE TRADE SECRETS AND TRANSFERRING THEM TO IRAN

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) announced a ban on imported internet routers after finding security vulnerabilities. (Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Last month, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued TP-Link Systems, a California-based router manufacturer spun off from a Chinese firm, for allegedly marketing its networking devices deceptively and allowing Beijing to access American consumers’ devices.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton speaks during the AmericaFest 2024 conference sponsored by Turning Point in Phoenix, Arizona, on Dec. 21, 2024. (Cheney Orr/Reuters)

TP-Link Systems said it would “vigorously defend” its reputation, adding that the Chinese government had no form of ownership or control over the company, its products or user data.

Reuters reported last month the Trump administration had put on hold a proposed ban on domestic sales of routers made by TP-Link.

CLICK HERE TO GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO

The FCC issued similar rules in December that ban the import of all new models of Chinese drones.

Reuters contributed to this report.

In an exchange filing, TVS Holdings said that its board of directors, during its meeting today, has declared the interim dividend of Rs 86 per share with a face value of Rs 5 each for the ongoing financial year 2026, with the total dividend payout standing at Rs 174 crore.

Record date for TVS Holdings dividend

The record date to determine the eligibility of the shareholders set to receive the dividend has been set on April 2. This means that only those shareholders who have the shares of the company on their demat accounts on April 2 will be eligible for the dividend. The dividend will be paid within 30 days from the declaration of the interim dividend, the company announced.

This comes after the company paid an interim dividend of Rs 93 to its shareholders in March last year, and Rs 94 in April 2024.

Additionally, the company also announced that it has raised Rs 650 crore by issuing non-convertible debentures (NCDs) at an 8.10% coupon rate with a 39-month term.

Live Events

TVS Holdings share price

The shares of the company sharply surged nearly 3% to trade at Rs 14,125 apiece on NSE on Wednesday. The stock has gained more than 57% in the past one year, and over 265% over the past three years.
The Chennai-headquartered company has undergone key transformations in recent years, including its rebranding from Sundaram-Clayton to TVS Holdings. The company acts as the holding arm of the larger TVS Group, which has been expanding its footprint across mobility solutions, electric vehicles, and global operations.Through its subsidiaries and associates, TVS Holdings has interests in two-wheeler manufacturing, electric vehicle initiatives and global operations. Earlier in January this year, TVS Holdings reported a 28% year-on-year rise in consolidated net profit to Rs 493 crore for the October-December quarter of the ongoing financial year 2026. The firm’s revenue from operations grew 34% YoY to Rs 15,276 crore during the same period.

(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)

The Supreme Court unanimously ruled Wednesday that internet providers are not liable for copyright infringement by their users, delivering an opinion in Cox v. Sony and tossing a $1 billion verdict.

“Under our precedents, a company is not liable as a copyright infringer for merely providing a service to the public with knowledge that it will be used by some to infringe copyrights,” Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in the opinion. “Accordingly, we reverse.”

The ruling marks a significant win for broadband providers facing pressure from copyright owners to police subscriber activity.

Cox Communications now cannot be held liable for piracy by its internet service subscribers of songs owned by Sony Music, Warner Music Group, Universal Music Group and other labels, ending their billion-dollar-plus music copyright lawsuit.

PARAMOUNT WINS MAJOR LEGAL VICTORY OVER ‘TOP GUN: MAVERICK’ COPYRIGHT CLAIMS FROM WRITER’S FAMILY

The 9-0 ruling overturned a lower court’s decision to order a new trial to determine how much the internet service provider owed the record labels for a form of liability called contributory copyright infringement. Cox had said a retrial could have produced a verdict against the Atlanta-based ISP of as much as $1.5 billion.

“The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit is reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion,” the ruling concluded.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, agreed Cox should prevail in this case but rejected the majority’s broader reasoning. 

In her separate opinion, Sotomayor wrote that “the majority, without any meaningful explanation, unnecessarily limits secondary liability” and warned that the decision “also upends the statutory incentive structure that Congress created.” 

EPIC GAMES CUTS 1,000 JOBS AS FORTNITE ‘MAGIC’ FADES IN ‘EXTREME’ MARKET CONDITIONS

All nine members of the Supreme Court agreed that an internet provider cannot be held liable for the copyright infringement of their subscribers. (Getty Images / Getty Images)

“The facts of this case do not establish the requisite intent needed to hold Cox liable for infringement that occurred on its network,” she concluded. 

“Because the majority needlessly curtails secondary liability in a manner inconsistent with both precedent and statute, I concur only in the judgment.”

More than 50 labels joined together to sue Cox in 2018. Internet service providers like Cox are generally not considered liable under U.S. law for infringement by their users if they take reasonable measures to address it. But the labels accused Cox, the largest unit of privately owned Cox Enterprises, of failing to respond to thousands of infringement notices, cut off internet access for repeat infringers or take other piracy-deterrence steps.

A jury in Alexandria, Virginia, in 2019 found Cox owed the labels $1 billion for user infringement of more than 10,000 copyrights. The jury found Cox liable both for contributory infringement and vicarious infringement, two forms of secondary copyright infringement liability.

DELTA SUSPENDS VIP SERVICES FOR CONGRESS MEMBERS AMID DHS SHUTDOWN, TSA DELAYS

The Richmond, Virginia-based 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals threw out the damages award in 2024. The 4th Circuit ordered a retrial on the award’s size after affirming the jury’s finding of contributory infringement but reversing its finding of vicarious liability.

People look at the U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, D.C., March 14, 2026.  (REUTERS/Will Dunham / Reuters Photos)

Contributory infringement involves holding parties liable for someone else’s infringement because they knew about it and contributed to it. Vicarious infringement involves holding parties liable for someone else’s infringement because they had the ability to control the infringement and benefited financially from it.

Cox argued that the position taken by the labels in the case would expand the concept of contributory infringement too broadly. Cox said this stance would threaten to cut off access for thousands of innocent internet users including “entire households, coffee shops, hospitals, universities” and others “merely because some unidentified person was previously alleged to have used the connection to infringe.”

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Cox utility trucks are parked at the Cox Communications Springfield Warehouse on May 16, 2025, in Springfield, Virginia. (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images / Getty Images)

The Supreme Court heard arguments in the case in December. A lawyer for President Donald Trump‘s administration argued in support of Cox. Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft and other internet-focused tech companies supported Cox in the case, too. Music, film and book industry trade groups backed the labels.

READ THE SUPREME COURT OPINION – APP USERS, CLICK HERE:

Reuters contributed to this report.

Group focusing on key North West growth areas including retail, sports and infrastructure

A law firm holding its national conference in Manchester for the first time says the city’s ‘Manchesterism’ effect, as promoted by Andy Burnham, has encouraged its investment in the region.

Foot Anstey is holding its Partner Conference in Manchester this week after announcing plans to grow its headcount in the North West.

Foot Anstey recently reported its strongest-ever financial results, with revenues for the 2024/25 financial year reaching £76.9m. The Bristol-based firm employs more than 700 people, with other offices in Belfast, Exeter, London, Plymouth and Southampton.

In the North West, the group aims to grow its offering in key growth areas including retail, sports, infrastructure and technology. It will also continue its to “break down barriers” in the legal profession,

Foot Anstey plans to grow its headcount in the North West region and further develop its legal offering in line with key business growth sectors of retail, sports, infrastructure and technology.

The firm’s strategy also focuses on breaking down barriers to entry into the legal profession across the UK, including Manchester, through initiatives such as Achieve, its award-winning vacation scheme supporting Black and minority ethnic candidates.

The firm’s pledge to donate 1% of its net profits annually to responsible business programmes is already benefiting initiatives within Greater Manchester such as the Wood Street Mission.

Martin Hirst, managing partner at Foot Anstey, said: “The high calibre of our established team in Manchester as well as positive economic data gives us the confidence to make further investment in Manchester and the wider North West region. This is why we have selected Manchester as the location for our partner conference this year bringing people together at the heart of this exceptional business environment. I look forward to seeing the positive impact we will create in Manchester in the years ahead, not just in business terms but in social investment too.”

Melanie McGuirk, partner at Foot Anstey in Manchester, said: “The ‘Manchesterism’ effect is certainly being noticed in other parts of the country and is a major pull factor for business. The strength of Manchester’s economy is an important part of our decision as a firm to commit to this city. It’s a city that is growing in confidence and capability, attracting high-growth companies and exceptional talent, and we’re committed to being part of that continued growth.”

Jan Levinson, partner at Foot Anstey in Manchester, said: “We are building a powerhouse law firm, backed by exceptional talent and a clear vision for growth. Over the coming year, we will continue to expand our capability to support the most complex commercial disputes and high-value advisory matters, working alongside the region’s most ambitious organisations and leaders”

Breck Homes says scheme will be ‘100% affordable’

A new housing estate could be built on the green belt in Stockport close to the Airport Relief Road.

Plans have been submitted to the council to build 64 ‘affordable’ homes on the fields off Bolshaw Road in Heald Green.

It is close to the border with Cheshire with Handforth sitting on the other side of the A555.

Developer Breck Homes said in its planning application that the land is ‘well located for access to local shops, employment, community facilities and public services, many accessible from the site on foot.’

A report set out the vision: ‘The site will provide 100 per cent affordable housing, infrastructure needs will be met, and accessible public open space will be provided.

‘The streets have been designed to be a safe, pleasant environment for residents. This is within the context of Heald Green being a sustainable location in which residents can live, work and play.’

The developer said people with a local connection but without the ‘financial means’ to live in the area would be given ‘priority’ for housing allocation.

If the scheme is approved, half the homes would be at social rent prices, with the other half for shared ownership.

The developer explained in its application that while the site is part of the green belt, it ‘fulfils the definition of ‘grey belt’ in accordance with national planning policy.’

A ‘grey belt’ designation can mean land being released from its protected status or allocated for housing development.

This would be weighed up by Stockport council when reviewing the plans.

The planning application continued: ‘The combination of dwelling types and sizes, with apartments of one or two bedrooms and homes of two, three, and four bedrooms, will meet the needs of a wide range of users.’

Proposals could see new homes built on the land come with ‘spacious private gardens’ and communal areas for the apartments.

Planning documents state that the area is serviced by ‘regular bus services stopping 100m from the site’ which will ‘enable travel to locations such as Stockport, Macclesfield and Manchester Airport all within 30 minutes.’

Reports claimed that Heald Green train station is a ’15-minute walk from the site along Cross Road’, but Google Maps suggested the trek could take closer to half an hour from the application area.

Stockport is facing a shortage of affordable housing like in other areas of Greater Manchester.

More than 9,000 people are registered on Homechoice, a platform used by social housing provider Stockport Homes for bidding on properties.

The Lib Dem-led council has plans to build a total of 8,000 homes in Stockport town centre with a ‘brownfield first’ approach to development.

Stockport council has set a target date of May 25 for the plans to be decided.

To find all the planning applications, traffic diversions, road layout changes, alcohol licence applications and more in your community, visit the Public Notices Portal.

Many skincare brands focus heavily on their formulas but overlook one important detail: packaging. Even high-quality products can struggle to attract attention if the packaging does not reflect the product’s value. Customers often make quick decisions based on how a product looks, feels, and presents itself on a shelf or website.

This is why packaging plays a bigger role than many brands realize. The right packaging not only protects skincare formulas but also shapes how customers perceive the brand. In this article, we explore the hidden role packaging plays in building premium skincare brands and why it matters for long-term success.

Why Packaging Matters in the Skincare Industry

Many skincare products contain active ingredients that react to light, air, and heat. Because of this, packaging does more than hold the product. It helps protect the formula so it stays stable and safe to use.

At the same time, packaging shapes how customers feel about a product. When someone sees a clean bottle with a good design, they often expect better quality. So even before the first drop is used, the packaging has already started doing its job.

Key Functions of Skincare Packaging

Packaging plays several important roles in skincare products:

• Protects the formula from light, air, and outside contamination
• Helps keep ingredients stable for a longer time
• Makes it easier for customers to use the product properly
• Adds a professional look that builds trust
• Supports the brand image on store shelves and online

When these elements work together, the product feels more reliable. And yes, people often trust a product that looks like it belongs in a fancy bathroom.

How Packaging Influences Premium Brand Perception

Premium skincare brands rarely treat packaging as an afterthought. Instead, they treat it like part of the product itself. When customers hold a bottle that feels sturdy and well made, they often believe the formula inside is just as good.

Also, packaging helps create a clear identity for the brand. Colors, shapes, and materials send signals about quality and style. A simple and clean design often feels more refined, while cheap or weak containers can quickly lower a product’s value in the eyes of customers.

Elements That Make Packaging Look Premium

Several details help packaging give a high-end impression:

• Strong and durable materials
• Clean and minimal design
• Smooth dispensing systems
• Consistent colors and labeling
• Containers that feel comfortable to hold

Small details matter here. A smooth pump, for example, might seem like a tiny thing. Still, when it works perfectly every time, customers notice. And when customers notice, they remember the brand.

The Importance of Material Selection in Premium Packaging

The material used in packaging can affect both product safety and how the brand is seen by customers. Some materials protect formulas better, while others make products easier to store, ship, or handle. Because of this, skincare brands must choose packaging materials with care.

At the same time, customers often link material quality with product quality. A sturdy container usually makes a product feel more trustworthy. On the other hand, weak packaging can make even a good formula seem less reliable.

Common Packaging Materials in Skincare

Each option has its own strengths. Because of this, brands often choose materials based on the product type, storage needs, and the experience they want customers to have.

Packaging as a Branding and Marketing Tool

Packaging often acts like the first salesperson for a skincare product. Customers usually see the container before they know anything about the formula. Because of this, packaging helps shape the first impression of the brand.

At the same time, good packaging helps a product stand out in crowded stores or online listings. A clean design, clear labeling, and practical container can make a product easier to recognize. And when customers recognize a brand quickly, they are more likely to trust it.

How Packaging Builds Brand Recognition

Several packaging choices help brands stay memorable:

• Consistent colors across product lines
• Clear and readable labeling
• Recognizable container shapes
• Reliable dispensing systems
• Quality finishes that look professional

When these elements work together, the packaging becomes part of the brand identity. Customers may even spot the bottle before they read the label. And yes, that moment usually means the packaging has done its job well.

Behind Every Product Is a Packaging Partner

Most skincare brands do not manufacture their own packaging. Instead, they work with suppliers who provide the containers that hold the product. These partners supply bottles, jars, droppers, caps, and pumps that keep production running smoothly.

A dependable packaging partner helps brands solve practical problems. For example, a skincare company might need containers that protect sensitive ingredients, match the brand’s design, and stay available for future batches.

What Skincare Brands Expect From a Packaging Supplier

When choosing a supplier, brands usually look for several things:

• Consistent container quality across different production runs
• Multiple material options, such as glass and plastic
• Different closure types including pumps, caps, and droppers
• Reliable inventory so products are not delayed

Because of these needs, many skincare brands work with established suppliers. Companies like FH Packaging provide a wide range of containers and closures used by beauty and wellness products. Having these options in one place makes packaging decisions easier for growing brands.

At the end of the day, the right packaging partner keeps everything moving behind the scenes while the brand focuses on its products.

Small Packaging Details That Customers Remember

Customers often notice packaging only after they start using the product. That is when small details begin to matter.

A bottle might look attractive on the shelf. Still, if it is hard to use, customers remember the frustration. On the other hand, when packaging works smoothly, the product experience feels much better.

Details That Improve the User Experience

Small design choices can make a big difference during daily use:

• Smooth pumps that release the right amount of product
• Tight-fitting caps that prevent leaks
• Comfortable bottle shapes that are easy to hold
• Durable containers that do not crack or break easily

Sometimes the smallest things create the biggest impression. A pump that works perfectly every morning may not seem special at first. Yet if it fails, customers notice immediately. Nobody wants their skincare routine turning into a science experiment at 7 AM.

Because of this, premium skincare brands pay attention to these details. When packaging works well, the product feels more reliable from the first use to the last drop.

Why Choosing the Right Packaging Supplier Matters

A skincare product may have a strong formula and a clean design. Still, without dependable packaging supply, production can quickly run into problems. Because of this, brands usually work with suppliers who specialize in packaging for beauty products.

A reliable supplier helps brands choose containers that match both the product and the brand image. Some formulas need strong protection from light or air. Others require containers that are easy for customers to use every day. When the supplier understands these needs, packaging decisions become much easier.

What Brands Usually Look For in a Packaging Supplier

Before choosing a supplier, skincare companies often check a few practical things:

• Product variety such as bottles, jars, pumps, and caps
• Material options including glass and plastic containers
• Reliable inventory so packaging stays available during production
• Consistent quality across every batch of containers

Many brands prefer suppliers that provide several packaging options in one place. For example, companies like FH Packaging offer containers and closures commonly used in beauty and wellness products. This makes it easier for skincare brands to select packaging that fits their formulas and product lines.

In simple terms, a strong packaging partner keeps the production process stable. When containers arrive on time and meet quality standards, brands can focus on developing products and serving customers.

Trends Shaping Premium Skincare Packaging

Packaging styles in the skincare market continue to change as customer expectations grow. Brands now pay closer attention to how containers look, feel, and function during daily use.

One noticeable change is the move toward simpler designs. Many premium skincare products now use clean labels and neutral colors. This style often gives the product a more refined appearance.

At the same time, brands also focus on practicality. Customers prefer containers that work smoothly without creating a mess or wasting product.

Final Thoughts

Packaging often works quietly in the background, yet it plays an important role in how skincare products are experienced by customers. It protects formulas, supports daily use, and shapes the way people view a brand.

Premium skincare brands understand that the container is part of the product itself. From the material of the bottle to the smoothness of a pump, each detail contributes to the overall experience.

When brands choose reliable packaging materials and dependable suppliers, their products gain a stronger presence in the market. In the end, good packaging helps a skincare brand present its products with confidence and consistency.