Calamos Investments is a diversified global investment firm offering innovative investment strategies including U.S. growth equity, global equity, convertible, multi-asset and alternatives. The firm offers strategies through separately managed portfolios, mutual funds, closed-end funds, private funds, an exchange traded fund and UCITS funds. Clients include major corporations, pension funds, endowments, foundations and individuals, as well as the financial advisors and consultants who serve them. Headquartered in the Chicago metropolitan area, the firm also has offices in London, New York and San Francisco.  For more information, please visit www.calamos.com.

A 15-year-old girl from New Jersey has dropped her lawsuit against Meta Platforms, Google and Snap Inc., abandoning a test case that was among the first scheduled to determine how juries might view claims that major social media companies deliberately designed their platforms to be addictive to young users, according to Reuters.

The plaintiff, identified in California court records as P.M-Y., withdrew her claims Thursday, Aug. 20, according to a court filing, without receiving any payment from the remaining defendants. TikTok, which had also been named as a defendant in her case, had previously settled her claims separately.

The teen’s lawsuit had alleged that Meta, the owner of Facebook and Instagram, along with Google and Snap, contributed to her social media addiction, depression and self-harm. Emily Jeffcott, an attorney representing P.M-Y., said in a statement that her client chose to dismiss the remainder of her claims out of a desire to move forward with her life. Jeffcott said her client had “initiated this process with the goal of holding social media companies accountable and to push for changes to protect young people like herself.”

P.M-Y.’s case was among more than 3,300 individual personal injury lawsuits consolidated in California state court in Los Angeles, part of a broader wave of litigation brought by individuals, states and school districts against major social media companies over allegations their platforms cause harm to children. Her case had been selected as one of three so-called “bellwether,” or test, cases scheduled to go to trial in October. Attorneys frequently rely on bellwether verdicts to gauge how juries are likely to respond to similar claims across a larger pool of consolidated cases, using those early results to help assess the potential value of remaining lawsuits and to inform broader settlement negotiations.

Meta addressed the dismissal in a statement, drawing a distinction it said applied broadly across the consolidated litigation. “This plaintiff had a significant mental health condition that pre-dated her use of social media, and it’s clear that many of these cases fit the same pattern,” the company said, adding that it intends to vigorously defend against the remaining cases still pending.

Google-owned YouTube characterized the dismissal as consistent with its own longstanding position on platform safety. “Our longstanding position that we provide safe, age-appropriate experiences and strong parental controls for young people and families,” the company said in a statement responding to the case’s dismissal. A Snap spokesperson separately said the company remains focused on strengthening safeguards, tools and educational resources designed to support users’ safety, privacy and overall well-being.

Two additional bellwether cases brought by teenagers making similar claims against the same group of companies remain scheduled for trial in October, according to court records reviewed by Reuters. TikTok has already reached settlements in both of those remaining cases, mirroring its earlier resolution of P.M-Y.’s claims.

The dismissal follows a similar pattern from a separate bellwether case that concluded before reaching trial in July, when a different teenage plaintiff dropped his claims against Meta after the other named defendants in his case had already reached settlements.

The broader litigation has already produced at least one significant jury verdict. The first individual trial within the consolidated litigation concluded in March, resulting in a jury awarding $4.2 million in damages against Meta and $1.8 million against Google in a case brought by a woman who alleged she became addicted to social media platforms at a young age due to their attention-grabbing design. TikTok and Snap had settled that particular case before it reached trial.

Meta is currently defending itself in two separate, larger-scale trials examining similar allegations brought by state governments rather than individual plaintiffs. One trial, which began this week in federal court in Oakland, California, involves claims brought by 29 states alleging Meta designed its platforms to be addictive to children and misled the public regarding their safety. A separate trial addressing similar claims brought specifically by the state of Tennessee is proceeding concurrently in state court in Nashville.

The companies named across this broader wave of litigation have consistently denied the underlying allegations, maintaining that they have implemented extensive measures to protect teenage and younger users on their platforms. Even as individual bellwether cases such as P.M-Y.’s have been dismissed or settled ahead of trial, the two ongoing state-led trials in Oakland and Nashville represent what legal observers have characterized as a more significant near-term test of how courts and juries may ultimately assess the broader claims underlying thousands of similar lawsuits still pending against major social media companies nationwide.

With P.M-Y.’s case now dismissed and two other individual bellwether trials still scheduled for October, attorneys on both sides of the broader litigation are likely to continue closely watching how those remaining test cases unfold, given their potential influence on settlement negotiations and legal strategy across the thousands of similar claims still working their way through the consolidated California litigation and other related lawsuits filed by individuals, school districts and state governments across the country.

This story discusses topics including depression, self-harm and addiction, which can be difficult to read about, particularly as they relate to a minor. If you or someone you know is struggling with self-harm, depression or a mental health crisis, you can call or text 988 to reach the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline, available 24/7, or visit 988lifeline.org for additional support and resources.

Fred Alger Management, LLC (“Alger”) is a privately held $27.4 billion growth equity investment manager. Alger is a pioneer of actively managed, growth equity investing. Their journey over the past six decades has been defined by navigating change, embracing disruption, and investing in innovation.​​ Note: This account is not managed or monitored by Fred Alger Management, and any messages sent via Seeking Alpha will not receive a response. For inquiries or communication, please use Fred Alger Management’s official channels.

ZANDVOORT, Netherlands — Lando Norris claimed victory at the Dutch Grand Prix on Sunday, securing back-to-back wins and closing in on the leader of the Formula 1 championship standings, while home favorite Max Verstappen suffered a violent crash on the opening lap of the race in front of his home crowd.

Norris, who started from pole position, crossed the finish line 11.536 seconds ahead of championship leader Kimi Antonelli, delivering a commanding performance in what became a chaotic race around the Zandvoort circuit. George Russell fended off Lewis Hamilton in the closing stages to secure the final podium position for Mercedes, while Charles Leclerc rounded out the top five, more than 17 seconds off the pace.

The victory extends Norris’ recent momentum following his win at the Hungarian Grand Prix, which had marked the first breakthrough of a difficult title defense for the reigning world champion. Despite Sunday’s win, Norris remains 83 points behind Antonelli in the standings, sitting fourth overall, though his performance reinforced his position back within the broader championship conversation. Reflecting on the race afterward, Norris credited both the difficulty of the fight and the strength of his strategy. “I made it tough for myself today, but a good race,” Norris said. “Well fought. Probably one of my better wins. We had to fight for it. The pace was very strong and I managed things incredibly well today. Over the moon, very happy and nice to win the final race here in Zandvoort.”

The most dramatic moment of the race came almost immediately after the start. Verstappen, competing in front of his passionate home crowd, had been locked in an aggressive battle with his temporary Red Bull teammate Liam Lawson during the opening exchanges. Having emerged from that duel, Verstappen appeared to clip a wheel on the kerb along the inside of Zandvoort’s steeply banked, 18-degree final corner before sliding across the track and crashing heavily into the barriers. The four-time world champion’s car bounced back across the racing surface directly ahead of Pierre Gasly and Arvid Lindblad, while a detached left-rear tire rolled away separately from the wreckage. Verstappen confirmed over team radio that he was unharmed as the race was immediately red-flagged. “Yeah that’s it. I’m sorry guys,” he said.

The chaos continued almost simultaneously elsewhere on track, as Gabriel Bortoleto spun his car, sending up a cloud of tire smoke through which his teammate Nico Hülkenberg had to navigate, narrowly avoiding a separate major collision. The race was halted for roughly 30 minutes before resuming.

Once racing got back underway, Antonelli and Norris went wheel-to-wheel through Turn 1, with the Mercedes driver forcing his way past the polesitter. Russell, meanwhile, was caught out by an ambitious move from Oscar Piastri, who dove up the inside to claim third position. Ferrari faced its own internal tension during the race, with Hamilton pushing his team over radio to allow him past teammate Leclerc, only for the team to instruct him to pit instead. Hamilton expressed clear frustration with that call before ultimately pitting a lap later. “Great way of wasting time guys, good job,” he said sarcastically over the radio.

Norris’ race-winning move came down to a well-timed strategic gamble. He made his final pit stop seven laps later than Antonelli, a decision aimed at closing the gap to the race leader on fresher tires. The strategy paid off decisively, as Norris charged down Antonelli and completed the pass around the outside of Turn 1 on lap 54 to retake the lead.

A virtual safety car period later in the race prompted Antonelli, Hamilton and Leclerc to all pit simultaneously, temporarily promoting Russell to second position, though the trio behind him returned to the track on fresher rubber. Russell quickly found himself under pressure from Antonelli, who closed in aggressively on his gearbox. Mercedes intervened directly, asking Russell to allow his championship-contending teammate through. Russell complied, though not without some visible frustration, understanding the move placed him at renewed risk from Hamilton closing in from behind. Russell ultimately held off that challenge, securing third place and preserving a result significant to his own championship position.

Following the race, Russell and Hamilton remain tied for third in the overall standings, sitting 59 points behind Antonelli. Russell had separately boosted his title prospects by winning Saturday’s sprint race at the same venue, adding to what has become an increasingly competitive multi-way battle for the championship as the season progresses.

Weather conditions added further unpredictability to Sunday’s race, with heavy rain sweeping through the seaside town roughly 45 minutes before the scheduled start. The track had dried sufficiently by the time the lights went out, however, allowing the full field to begin the race on slick tires rather than requiring an intermediate or wet-weather start.

With Norris now back within striking distance of the championship battle following consecutive victories, and Verstappen’s home race ending prematurely in a dramatic crash, the Dutch Grand Prix added further intensity to what has already developed into one of the more tightly contested Formula 1 title fights in recent seasons, with Antonelli, Norris, Russell and Hamilton all remaining in active contention as the season moves toward its concluding races.

First Eagle is an independent investment management firm that manages approximately $149* billion in assets (as of 09/30/24) on behalf of institutional and individual clients. With the core purpose of providing prudent stewardship of client assets, the firm focuses on active, fundamental and benchmark-agnostic investing, with a strong focus on downside mitigation. First Eagle’s investment capabilities include equity, fixed income and multi-asset strategies. With a heritage dating back to 1864, First Eagle has helped its clients avoid permanent impairment of capital and earn attractive returns through widely varied economic cycles—a tradition that is central to its mission today. First Eagle Investments is the brand name for First Eagle Investment Management, LLC and its subsidiary investment advisers. Note: This account is not managed or monitored by First Eagle, and any messages sent via Seeking Alpha will not receive a response. For inquiries or communication, please use First Eagle’s official channels.

This article was written by

Follow

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha’s Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.