Avience Biomedicals is set to make its stock market debut on the NSE SME platform on Thursday, with grey market signals pointing to a strong listing. The company’s shares were commanding a grey market premium (GMP) of around 62% over the issue price of Rs 208, indicating an estimated listing price of around Rs 337, subject to market conditions.

The Rs 30.24 crore IPO, which comprised entirely a fresh issue of 14.54 lakh shares, witnessed overwhelming investor interest during the three-day bidding period. The issue was subscribed 385.32 times, driven by robust participation across all investor categories.

The non-institutional investor (NII) segment led the demand with a subscription of 597.23 times, while the retail portion was subscribed 401.36 times. The qualified institutional buyer (QIB) category attracted bids for 196.77 times the shares reserved.

The company had fixed the IPO price at Rs 208 per share. Retail investors were required to apply for a minimum of 1,200 shares, translating into an investment of Rs 2.50 lakh.

Incorporated in 2024, Avience Biomedicals manufactures, supplies and exports molecular diagnostic solutions catering to the biotechnology, genomics and in-vitro diagnostics (IVD) industry. Its portfolio includes rapid test kits, molecular diagnostic products, biochemistry and hematology analysers, reagents and medical devices. The company serves pathology laboratories, hospitals, research centres and government institutions across India and overseas, while also trading in medical equipment.

The IPO proceeds will be used to partly fund the setting up of a new manufacturing facility at the Medical Device Park under the Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority in Uttar Pradesh, meet working capital requirements and for general corporate purposes.
On the financial front, the company reported total income of Rs 45.97 crore and a net profit of Rs 7.23 crore for FY25. For the nine months ended January 2026, it posted revenue of Rs 41.94 crore and a profit after tax of Rs 5.74 crore.While the grey market premium suggests strong investor optimism ahead of listing, GMP is an unofficial indicator and does not guarantee listing gains.

(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of Economic Times)

Thailand is dismantling long-standing barriers to foreign business while simultaneously implementing its most stringent crackdown on foreign property ownership in decades—a paradox that analysts caution is undermining the kingdom’s reputation as a dependable destination for long-term international investment.

Key takeaways

• Thailand is opening its economy to foreign businesses while cracking down hard on foreign property ownership, sending contradictory signals to international investors.
• The country closed its only legal path to foreign land ownership in 2022, then began prosecuting people for using the workarounds that gap forced them into.
• Regional competitors like Malaysia, Indonesia, and Cambodia now offer clearer ownership rights, putting Thailand at risk of losing the next decade of capital to its neighbours.

The two-track policy is not subtle. On one hand, the same government that is rewriting its business laws to attract the world’s capital is, on the other hand, prosecuting the people who already brought it.

A Reform Agenda With a Blind Spot

In April 2025, the Cabinet approved the biggest overhaul of the Foreign Business Act in twenty-five years. By January 2026, it confirmed it would strip ten business categories, including software development, off restricted lists, allowing foreign technology companies to operate in Thailand without a local partner or special licence. The reforms travel under the banner of Thailand 4.0, the government’s national programme to reposition the economy as modern, competitive, and open.

The commercial logic is clear. Thailand has slipped behind Vietnam and Indonesia; OECD membership demands a better openness score, and the old instinct toward protectionism has had to give way to competitiveness.

Yet while one ministry courts global capital, another is conducting a very different operation.

The Crackdown

New rules require Thai shareholders in foreign-linked companies to prove the money they invested is genuinely theirs. An analytics system flags obvious fictions, such as the modest-salaried Thai who somehow owns most of a multi-million-baht villa. A May operation on Koh Phangan, conducted around a prime ministerial inspection, ended in 22 arrests and the seizure of more than 40 rai of land. Police summonses are now issued under criminal procedure, and six agencies share data they once kept separate.

Enforcement, many observers note, is both overdue and imprecise. A Thai shareholder who contributed no capital, makes no decisions, and takes no profit is not an owner, they are a prop. When investigators find one person fronting dozens of companies, that is not a grey area; it is fraud.

But the same net is sweeping up ordinary foreign residents who acted in good faith. The retiree who purchased a single home a decade ago, through the exact company structure a respected Thai law firm sold as the normal way to proceed, and who has done nothing since but live there and pay tax, that person was not gaming the system. They were using the only system the country left them, after it tore down the legal alternative with its own hand.

How the Legal Road Was Closed

The absence of a legitimate ownership route is not an accident of history. It was a policy decision, made under pressure and never reversed.

In late 2022, with the pandemic still draining the economy, Thailand’s Cabinet approved a law that would have allowed qualifying foreigners to legally own a small plot of residential land, the first real, on-title route to ownership in two decades. A senior minister admitted the truth: foreigners could already get land anyway, through leases, the condo quota, and nominee companies. The law would simply have made one path legal and visible.

It lasted under two weeks. The opposition declared the government was selling off the country, and the bill was withdrawn. The honest route died. The workaround it was meant to replace was left exactly where it stood, because nobody had to cast a vote to keep it. Then, in March 2025, the Supreme Court knocked away even the fallback, ruling against the long-lease renewal structure that thousands of foreign buyers had trusted for security.

The sequence, as the original analysis puts it, amounts to a policy trap of Thailand’s own making: the country invited the capital, refused to legalise the ownership route, allowed the workaround to stand, then began prosecuting people for using it.

The Regional Scoreboard

Competitors are not standing still. Malaysia lets foreigners own freehold outright, name on the title, no nominee, with minimum-price floors to protect locals and a foreign-buyer levy to cool speculation. Indonesia, which like Thailand bars foreign freehold, offers a registered title a foreigner can hold in their own name for up to 80 years, and cracks down on nominees while pointing buyers toward it. Dubai drew clear freehold zones and became a global magnet on the strength of that legal certainty alone.

The scoreboard a buyer sees in 2026 is unforgiving: Malaysia offering direct freehold, Cambodia permanent freehold title in a dollar economy, Indonesia 80 years in your own name, and even Vietnam a clear if limited framework. Thailand, by contrast, offers condos only, no legal land route, a withdrawn ownership bill, and a lease that its own court has recently undercut.

The Path Forward

The business reform agenda suggests that Thailand’s policymakers understand the principle at stake. A barrier built on you have no other option was never really a barrier. It held only because nothing better stood beside it. Put a clean, legal road next to it, and the workarounds are not hunted into extinction; they are simply abandoned, because no sane person takes a dangerous detour when a highway runs alongside.

Thailand has accepted this logic for software companies. It has not yet been accepted by the family that wants to legally own its home.

The prescription from analysts is not a radical departure. It is consistency. Bringing back the 2022 ownership framework with guardrails, high thresholds, residential zones only, no land-banking, price floors for Thais, and a levy on speculation, rebuilding the long lease with real security after the 2025 ruling, modernising condo rules, and continuing to cut the Foreign Business Act’s sweeping 1999 other services clause would together provide the legal infrastructure the market currently lacks.

The country that pairs enforcement with a real, legal welcome wins the next decade of capital in this region. The one that enforces and never reforms watches that capital drive on to Kuala Lumpur, Phnom Penh, and Bali.

For now, Thailand remains, as one observer described it, one of the most desirable places on earth to live, and one of the most legally ambiguous places in its own region to invest.

Other People are Reading

This article was written by

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have a beneficial long position in the shares of GLOBAL X LITHIUM ETF (LIT), CONTEMPORARY AMPEREX TECHNOLOGY CO [HK:3750], ASX:RIO, ALB, GANFENG LITHIUM GROUP [SHE:002460], ASX:PLS, ZIJIN MINING GROUP [SHA:601899], TSX:LAC, TSX:LAR, ASX:CXO, ASX:GL1, ASX:EUR, GALAN LITHIUM [ASX:GLN], PMET RESOURCES [TSX:PMET], PATRIOT RESOURCES [ASX:PAT], ARGENTINA LITHIUM & ENERGY [TSXV:LIT], SIGMA LITHIUM [TSXV:SGML], LITHIUM IONIC CORP. [TSXV:LTH], ATLAS LITHIUM (ATLX), COSMOS EXPLORATION [ASX:C1X], MEGADO MINERALS [ASX:MEG], OMNIA METALS GROUP [ASX:OM1] either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

This article is for ‘information purposes only’ and should not be considered as any type of advice or recommendation. Readers should “Do Your Own Research” (“DYOR”) and all decisions are your own. See also Seeking Alpha Terms of Use of which all site users have agreed to follow. https://about.seekingalpha.com/terms

Seeking Alpha’s Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

A recall has been issued for nearly 6,000 pounds of a frozen meatloaf and mashed potato product over an undeclared soy allergen, according to the Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS).

North Dakota-based Power Plate Meals, LLC recalled about 5,795 pounds of its frozen Meatloaf with Garlic Mashed Potatoes products because of a misbranding and an undeclared allergen, FSIS said in its announcement last week.

The food item contains soy, while the packaging does not state that it contains the ingredient.

The affected items are 13.3-oz. vacuum sealed plastic tray packages labeled as Power Plate Meals Meatloaf with Garlic Mashed Potatoes with use-by dates between June 25, 2026, and June 10, 2027.

500K PACKAGES OF MACARONI AND CHEESE SOLD AT ALDI RECALLED OVER UNDECLARED SOY LECITHIN

The recalled products were produced between June 25, 2025, and June 10, 2026.

The impacted products were shipped to distributors in Minnesota, North Dakota and South Dakota.

Items subjected to the recall include establishment number “217SEND” inside the USDA mark of inspection.

The problem was discovered when a state inspector notified FSIS that the final label did not display soy in the ingredients list.

FSIS said there have been no confirmed reports of adverse reactions due to consumption of these meal products.

Anyone concerned about a reaction to the recalled items is urged to contact a healthcare provider.

Customers should not consume the frozen meals and either throw them away or return them to the place of purchase.

MORNINGSTAR FARMS RECALLS FOOD SOLD NATIONWIDE AFTER PLASTIC PIECES FOUND IN SELECT PRODUCTS

The frozen food product includes a ground beef meatloaf covered in barbecue sauce and served with mashed potatoes, broccoli and cauliflower.

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

The recall is classified as a Class II recall, meaning that it “involves a health hazard situation where there is a remote probability of adverse health consequences from use of the product,” according to the FSIS website.

Carnival CCL 0.66%increase; up pointing triangle said extreme geopolitical volatility has disrupted bookings, and the company issued a soft outlook for the current quarter as higher fuel costs continue to weigh on profit.

The cruise line said Tuesday that booking trends during the recent quarter were most disrupted across Europe, particularly in the Mediterranean region.

Copyright ©2026 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8