Senior Republican U.S. Senator Thom Tillis indicated that he will not support the Senate’s prospective crypto market structure legislation unless ethics provisions are included to constrain how White House officials may engage with digital assets. According to Politico, Tillis said there must be ethics language in the bill before it advances from the chamber, or he will oppose it.

Democratic Senator Ruben Gallego echoed the sentiment, stating that “there is no final bill — there is no final movement — unless there is a bipartisan agreement when it comes to the ethics provision.”

Tillis, who is slated to retire early next year, is a senior member of the Senate Banking Committee, the panel overseeing the legislation’s progress. The House of Representatives previously passed a version of the package, known as the CLARITY Act, in July. The Senate proposal would divide crypto regulatory responsibility between the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commission and has faced protracted discussions, particularly on ethics language and questions surrounding stablecoin yield payments.

Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have raised concerns about potential conflicts of interest tied to political figures and the crypto sector. Democratic lawmakers have criticized the activities of the Trump family’s crypto ventures and have sought to use the bill to address perceived conflicts of interest.

Talks on the ethics provisions are reportedly moving forward, though the exact language remains unsettled. “We’re making progress,” said Democratic Senator Adam Schiff to Politico. “We have been talking for a long time without making much progress, and now that other parts of the bill are starting to come together, we’re narrowing our differences.”

Schiff has previously signaled support for a comprehensive ethics framework that would constrain federal involvement with digital assets, including prohibitions on federal employees sponsoring, endorsing or issuing certain assets. He noted that such restrictions would apply broadly, potentially covering the president, who has publicly engaged with memecoins and NFT projects bearing his name.

As the policy process unfolds, the underlying regulatory architecture remains a central point of contention. The CLARITY Act’s approach to formally delineate jurisdiction between the CFTC and the SEC continues to be debated, with stakeholders concerned about gaps, preemption, and the treatment of complex instruments such as stablecoins. The negotiations also reflect a broader tension between enforcement aims and the creation of a clear, predictable regulatory framework for crypto markets.

Beyond the substantive regulatory mechanics, the discourse touches on how enforcement agencies—ranging from the SEC to the DOJ and the CFTC—will coordinate in policing digital-asset activities that intersect securities law, commodities rules, and anti-money-laundering standards. Compliance teams, exchanges, and financial institutions are watching closely for any shifts that could affect licensing, cross-border operations, and banking-crypto integration. The discussion also occurs within a wider international context, where peers in other jurisdictions are pursuing their own ethics and disclosure frameworks for political contributions and crypto-related sponsorships. For instance, Canada has moved to advance legislation addressing crypto political donations, illustrating how political finance considerations are converging with crypto regulation in multiple markets.

Industry participants are contending with a dynamic policy environment in which ethics provisions, if enacted, could shape how corporate actors interact with policymakers and legislators. The potential reach of a broad ethics regime—one that could apply to the president and other senior officials—would set a high compliance bar for political communications and asset endorsements, with implications for corporate governance, lobbying disclosures, and conflict-of-interest management.

In sum, the trajectory of the Senate’s crypto market structure bill remains contingent on the ethical guardrails inserted into the package. With the CLARITY Act already enacted in the House and ongoing negotiations in the Senate, the outcome will influence how regulators allocate oversight between the CFTC and SEC, how digital-asset products are treated under securities and commodities laws, and how public-private sector collaboration proceeds in a landscape marked by rapid innovation and heightened scrutiny.

Closing perspective: The next phase hinges on whether ethics provisions achieve bipartisan consensus. If such language is adopted, it could materially alter the policy trajectory, enforcement priorities, and compliance burdens for crypto firms and financial institutions operating in the United States.

TLDR

• GOP Senator Thom Tillis pledges to oppose the Clarity Act without ethics safeguards in place
• The North Carolina lawmaker seeks restrictions on White House personnel profiting from digital currencies
• Democratic legislators push for prohibitions on federal workers endorsing or launching digital tokens
• Financial firm TD Cowen identifies Tillis as the “latest roadblock” hindering legislative progress
• Market watchers now estimate a 33% probability of passage before year’s end

---

North Carolina Republican Senator Thom Tillis has issued an ultimatum regarding the Senate’s cryptocurrency regulatory framework, the Clarity Act, stating he will oppose the legislation without provisions governing how administration officials engage with or benefit from digital assets.

The senator outlined his stance publicly this Monday. “Ethics language must be incorporated into the legislation before Senate passage, or I’ll transition from negotiator to opposition,” he stated to Politico.

As a ranking member of the Senate Banking Committee, Tillis wields considerable authority over the bill’s progression through the legislative process.

His decision not to pursue another term adds weight to his position, according to policy analysts who suggest this frees him from political calculations typically associated with reelection campaigns.

Financial services firm TD Cowen characterized Tillis as the “latest roadblock” impeding the measure. “We anticipate Tillis will maintain his position, given his recent successful confrontation with the administration regarding the Federal Reserve,” noted Jaret Seiberg, who serves as managing director at TD Cowen’s Washington Research Group.

The senator had previously prevented advancement of Kevin Warsh’s Federal Reserve chairman nomination, reversing course only after Friday’s announcement that a Justice Department investigation into sitting chairman Jerome Powell had been terminated. Following that development, Tillis indicated support for Warsh’s appointment.

Ethics Provisions at the Center of the Debate

Democratic members of Congress have persistently advocated for ethical guardrails within the legislation. Senator Adam Schiff articulated earlier this year that Democrats are seeking “a ban on sponsoring, endorsing or issuing digital assets that applies to all federal employees,” explicitly including the commander-in-chief.

Such provisions would presumably impact the Trump family’s ventures, which include a memecoin launch and non-fungible token collections bearing the president’s likeness and branding.

Democratic Senator Ruben Gallego emphasized that “no final bill — no final movement — unless there is a bipartisan agreement when it comes to the ethics provision.”

Senator Schiff reported that negotiations are gaining momentum. “We have been talking for a long time without making much progress, and now that other parts of the bill are starting to come together, we’re narrowing our differences,” he explained.

What the Bill Does

The Clarity Act establishes a regulatory division of responsibility between the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commission for cryptocurrency oversight. The House of Representatives approved its companion legislation this past July.

The measure has encountered numerous postponements connected to ethics requirements, stablecoin interest distribution, and various outstanding matters.

TD Cowen’s Seiberg identified several additional obstacles, including insufficient commissioner appointments at the CFTC, controversies surrounding the Trump-affiliated cryptocurrency venture World Liberty Financial, and questions regarding Iran’s utilization of digital currency transactions.

Seiberg acknowledged last month he is “increasingly pessimistic” and calculates a one-in-three probability of passage during the current year. He has previously suggested the legislation might be postponed until 2027, with implementing regulations potentially not taking effect until 2029.

Tillis requested that the Senate Banking Committee postpone markup proceedings on the bill until May.

Key Takeaways

• Ethereum declined 3.4% to reach $2,287 following its fourth consecutive failure to surpass the $2,400 threshold
• Daily chart analysis reveals a triple top formation, with critical support positioned at $2,150
• Approximately $2.5 billion in leveraged long positions are vulnerable below the $2,150 mark
• The ETH/BTC trading pair declined beneath 0.032, indicating relative underperformance versus Bitcoin
• Higher timeframe analysis suggests accumulation activity, though no definitive reversal confirmation exists

---

Ethereum has encountered significant resistance at the $2,400 threshold on four separate occasions beginning April 14, creating a triple top formation visible on daily timeframes. During Monday’s trading session, ETH experienced a 3.4% decline to $2,287, extending a pattern of unsuccessful breakout attempts.

The 100-day exponential moving average positioned around $2,350 has served as persistent overhead resistance during this timeframe. Daily candle closes have consistently failed to establish themselves above this technical level, restricting upward momentum.

Michaël van de Poppe from MN Capital highlighted deteriorating conditions in the ETH/BTC trading pair. The ratio descended below the 0.032 BTC threshold, violating a support boundary that had previously maintained bullish structure. Additionally, the ratio moved beneath its 21-period moving average, confirming diminishing relative strength compared to Bitcoin.

For the ETH/BTC pair, the subsequent higher timeframe support zone is located around 0.026 BTC, representing a level where demand has historically emerged.

Critical Support at $2,150 Under Scrutiny

Market participants are closely monitoring the $2,150 price level as the pivotal zone. This area previously functioned as overhead resistance before converting into a support foundation. Should this level fail to hold, Ethereum would likely test the $2,050 to $1,900 price corridor.

Liquidation information sourced from CoinGlass reveals that more than $2.5 billion in leveraged long contracts are positioned just beneath $2,150. A breach of this critical threshold could initiate a cascade of forced liquidations.

On the Binance exchange, Ether’s open interest has contracted to $2.58 billion, matching concentration levels observed when ETH traded near $2,200 earlier in April. The funding rate currently hovers near -0.013%, representing its lowest measurement since February, with short position establishment outpacing longs in recent activity.

Analyst Amr Taha observed that this configuration — characterized by reduced leverage and shorts-dominant positioning — creates conditions for a potential short squeeze if ETH maintains current price floors.

Extended Timeframe Analysis Points to Consolidation

Crypto Patel published a two-week timeframe chart on X illustrating Ethereum trading within the lower boundary of an extended rising channel pattern. The $1,700 to $2,250 range is identified as a liquidity capture and accumulation territory, representing a zone that has provided foundational support structure since 2022.

The initial resistance obstacle above present prices is situated near $2,480, with subsequent resistance spanning the $3,500 to $4,900 zone, encompassing the previous all-time high region around $4,876.

A complementary three-day chart presented by James Easton on X demonstrates a recurring pattern where substantial rallies have historically followed significant retracements. A white indicator marks the current 2026 low point, implying ETH may be constructing another foundational base.

Both technical perspectives refrain from confirming an imminent bullish reversal. Ethereum would need to successfully defend the accumulation territory and recapture the $2,480 level before any constructive thesis gains validation.

The decisive level for near-term price action remains $2,150, where technical support structure intersects with concentrated liquidation exposure on the daily chart.

ZetaChain has paused cross-chain transactions on its mainnet after detecting an attack on its GatewayEVM contract. 

The Layer 1 network said the move was a precaution while the team investigates the incident. GatewayEVM works as a key entry point for cross-chain activity between EVM-compatible networks and applications on ZetaChain. The contract helps route interactions across connected chains.

ZetaChain said the attack affected only internal team wallets. The team added that it had already closed the attack path to stop more funds from being compromised.

“As a precaution, cross-chain transactions are currently paused on ZetaChain,” the team said. “Investigation is still ongoing, and at this time no user funds were impacted by this attack.”

DefiLlama reports $300,000 loss

DefiLlama data shows the attack caused about $300,000 in losses. ZetaChain has not confirmed the exact amount and said it plans to publish a full post-mortem.

According to ZetaChain’s official status page, cross-chain transactions remained paused as of 9:00 p.m. ET on Monday. That was about nine hours after the team first identified the attack.

DeFi security concerns continue

ZetaChain launched its mainnet in early 2024 and focuses on blockchain interoperability. The project describes itself as a universal blockchain that connects networks such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Polygon.

The attack comes after several recent DeFi security incidents. The LayerZero-powered Kelp DAO bridge exploit drained $292 million and created bad debt on Aave. Since that event, DefiLlama data shows at least 10 attacks on DeFi projects.

Online payments firm Block has launched proof-of-reserves for its corporate Bitcoin treasury and two of its flagship products, Cash App and Square, joining a growing list of crypto companies proving their holdings onchain. 

“People shouldn’t have to trust that their bitcoin is there, they should be able to verify it,” the Jack Dorsey-led company said in a post to X after announcing the proof-of-reserves feature and other new offerings in Las Vegas on Monday.

Block said anyone can “independently confirm Block’s holdings” through on-chain signatures. “Reserves are actively controlled, not just historically observed,” it added.

Source: Block

The proof-of-reserves seeks to verify the 8,883 Bitcoin, worth $681.4 million, marked on Block’s balance sheet — the 14th-largest Bitcoin holding among corporate treasuries.

Proof-of-reserves became more widely adopted after the collapse of FTX in November 2022 as a transparency measure to assure customers that holdings were fully backed, secure and not at risk of misuse.

Binance, Kraken, OKX, Bitfinex and Bitget are among the largest crypto trading platforms that have adopted proof-of-reserves disclosures.

Strategy’s Saylor once said proof-of-reserves is a ‘bad idea’

Strategy, the biggest corporate holder of Bitcoin in the world, has not issued any proof-of-reserves. 

In May 2025, Strategy executive chairman Michael Saylor flagged proof-of-reserves as a security risk when asked why his company doesn’t adopt the measure, arguing that it exposes sensitive information.

“It actually dilutes the security of the issuer, the custodians, the exchanges and the investors,” Saylor said at the time. “It’s not a good idea. It’s a bad idea.” 

Display of Bitcoin proof-of-reserves for Block’s Bitcoin treasury, Cash App and Square. Source: Block

Block also launched a Bitkey hardware wallet with a touchscreen to verify transactions while rolling out a feature on Cash App allowing certain users to have payments automatically converted into Bitcoin.

Related: ‘Historical average’ could push Bitcoin bottom at $57K level: Analyst

Block is also offering 5% Bitcoin cash back rewards at Square merchants and has raised customer withdrawal limits fivefold to $10,000 per day and $25,000 per week.

Dorsey is one of the biggest advocates seeking to push Bitcoin payments into the mainstream.

He previously said Bitcoin payments must see wide adoption to uphold Satoshi Nakamoto’s original vision of Bitcoin as an electronic peer-to-peer cash system.

Magazine: Adam Back says current demand is ‘almost’ enough to send Bitcoin to $1M

Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently.

The Bank of Japan’s (BoJ) monetary policy decision on Tuesday boosted expectations of a hike in borrowing costs by the end of the second quarter. The yen is loving it, while bitcoin remains under pressure.

The central bank kept its benchmark interest rate unchanged at 0.75% as widely expected. The decision, however, wasn’t unanimous, as three board members wanted to hike rates today itself.

The 6–3 vote split is the largest since Kazuo Ueda became governor of the central bank, indicating that more policymakers are now pushing to raise borrowing costs.

Markets price June rate hike

The central bank also raised its forecast for core inflation to 2.8% for this fiscal year, while revising economic growth projections lower to 0.5% from 1%. The rationale behind the BoJ’s hawkish tilt is largely tied to war-related disruptions in energy flows through the Strait of Hormuz, which have pushed up global energy prices and fed into inflationary pressures across energy-import-dependent economies like Japan.

Traders immediately priced in a 74% chance of a rate hike on June 16. That aligns with the consensus among Bank of Japan watchers, who had widely expected a June hike ahead of the decision, according to Bloomberg News.

Yen jumps: Another carry unwind shock ahead?

The Japanese yen rose, pushing the dollar-yen (USD/JPY) pair down nearly 0.5% to 158.95 (For major currencies, that’s a notable move). Rate hikes, or expectations of them, typically support a country’s currency, in this case, the yen.

The bitcoin-yen pair (BTC/JPY) listed on bitFlyer fell by 0.6% to 12.28 million yen, consistent with the weakness in the dollar-denominated prices, according to data source TradingView.

Trends in the Japanese yen are closely watched, given its long-standing role as a funding currency.

Sustained yen strength is often associated with risk aversion. This is because the Bank of Japan’s prolonged period of ultra-low interest rates over the past decade, including the post-COVID years, encouraged traders to borrow in yen and invest in higher-yielding assets abroad.

As a result, yen strength is often seen as triggering the unwinding of these so-called carry trades. The unwinding of yen-funded positions was widely cited as weighing on global risk assets in August 2024, when bitcoin fell from $65,000 to $50,000 over the course of a week.

It is therefore possible that growing expectations of a potential rate hike in June could renew concerns about another episode of yen carry trade unwind-driven global risk aversion.

That said, the latest available data on market flows from February suggests otherwise. Japan continued increasing its holdings of U.S. Treasury notes, indicating that yen-funded carry trades remain active.

“Japan, the largest foreign holder, raised its stockpile by +$14 billion, to $1.24 trillion, the highest since February 2022. This marks Japan’s 13th monthly purchase of the last 14 months, as Japanese institutions continue chasing higher yields overseas,” the founders of newsletter service LondonCryptoClub said.

“As we have said, there is no “JPY carry unwind” trade. Those who are talking about that don’t understand how Japanese investors operate and you should ignore them,” they added.

Acting US Attorney General Todd Blanche said the US Department of Justice and FBI are no longer targeting blockchain developers over platforms used for illegal activity, instead shifting focus to the users engaged in financial crime.

Speaking at a Bitcoin conference in Las Vegas alongside FBI Director Kash Patel and Coinbase chief legal officer Paul Grewal on Monday, Blanche said that the approach to enforcement has significantly changed under the Trump administration.

The acting attorney general explained that as long as developers have nothing to do with illicit activity, the DOJ and FBI have no reason to go after them, noting that “we have fundamentally changed the game when it comes to our investigations.”

“The basic principle is that if you are developing software, if you are a coder, if you are part of that process and you are not the third-party user, and you are not helping and knowing the third party is using what you developed to commit crimes, you are not going to be investigated and not going to be charged,” he said.

The comments mark a shift in tone from the US government, which had taken strong action against the developers of platforms like Tornado Cash. The crypto mixer and privacy protocol faced significant enforcement action over illicit activity facilitated on the platform, such as money laundering and sanctions evasion.

Tornado Cash was sanctioned by the Office of Foreign Assets Control in August 2022 before the sanctions were lifted in November 2024. Developers Roman Storm and Roman Semenov were indicted in August 2023; Storm was convicted in August 2025, while Semenov remains at large. Storm has denied any wrongdoing.

Source: Cointelegraph

Doubts remain over DOJ’s approach

Blanche’s comments were seen as positive within the crypto community, but some argued that more work needs to be done to provide developers with clarity. 

Responding to Blanche on X, Coin Center executive director Peter Van Valkenburgh said it was a “better message than developers have heard from DOJ in recent years,” but the message still leaves room for doubt. 

“But the real question is where [the] DOJ draws the line between publishing noncustodial software and ‘helping’ or ‘knowing’ about a bad user,” he said. 

Van Valkenburgh pointed to a court case in which developer Michael Lewellen sued the DOJ for pre-enforcement clarity on whether publishing his Ethereum-based crowdfunding tool constituted money transmission.  

Related: Tennessee crypto kiosk ban set to go into effect July 1

The case was dismissed in late March, with a Texas court finding that Lewellen had failed to demonstrate that there was a credible threat of enforcement from the DOJ. 

“DOJ is publicly acknowledging that developers are still sleeping with one eye open. At the same time, DOJ is telling the courts that Lewellen should not be allowed to ask for legal clarity because there is no credible threat,” he said, adding:  

“If the law is so clear why are devs sleeping with one eye open? If the law is so clear why fight to have the case dismissed?”

The DOJ’s change in approach has been taking shape for more than a year. In April 2025, Blanche released a memo explaining how the DOJ would handle enforcement differently going forward.

The memo outlines a commitment to “ending regulation by prosecution,” under which developers will not be targeted for the actions of users of their platforms or for unwitting regulatory violations.

“I do not want any platform to look at the Department of Justice or the FBI as somebody who’s going to just cause them a lot of problems,” Blanche said at the Las Vegas conference. 

Magazine: AI-driven hacks could kill DeFi — unless projects act now

Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently.

Japanese crypto exchange Bitbank has launched a crypto-linked credit card that allows users to settle bills with assets held on its platform. 

The product marks a new step for crypto payments in Japan’s regulated market.

The card, named “EPOS Crypto Card for Bitbank,” was launched through a partnership with EPOS Card, the fintech arm of Marui Group. Bitbank said the service is the first in Japan to let credit card bills be settled directly from crypto exchange balances.

Bitcoin bill payments added for users

The card allows users to pay monthly credit card bills with bitcoin from their Bitbank accounts. The payment feature is currently limited to bitcoin, according to the company’s Monday release.

Bitbank said the service gives crypto holders another way to use digital assets without moving funds to another platform. The exchange and EPOS Card may consider adding more cryptocurrencies later.

Moreover, the EPOS Crypto Card for Bitbank also offers 0.5% cashback in crypto on monthly spending. Users can receive rewards in bitcoin, ether, or Aster.

The rewards will be deposited into users’ Bitbank accounts. This setup keeps the cashback inside the exchange and gives users direct access to their crypto rewards.

Japan’s crypto card market sees more activity

Bitbank’s launch follows growing activity around crypto-linked cards in Japan. Binance Japan introduced its own Binance Japan Card in January, allowing users to earn BNB from card spending.

The Bitbank card takes a different route by focusing on bill settlement from exchange-held crypto assets. The launch shows how Japanese crypto firms are adding payment services while working within local market rules.

Bitcoin bulls fell $515 short of their $80,000 target after BTC (BTC) topped out at $79,485 on Monday, but a potential upside is that the brief pullback provides a necessary retest of key underlying levels. 

In technical analysis, a break of structure is generally followed by a support-resistance retest as swing traders take profits at preset levels that align with metrics such as the Fibonacci retracement, exponential moving averages, Bollinger Bands, order book structure, and more. The support-resistance flip is also a feature traders look for to confirm that a longer-term resistance (in this case) has turned into support. When confirmed, it gives some traders the confidence to open new positions at the S/R level as they believe the break of structure and retest marks either the completion or the start of a trend reversal. 

After managing the first decisive breakout from the three-month-old channel, Bitcoin retested the channel resistance (at $76,688) that had pinned down every BTC rally since Feb. 8. A deeper retest could see the price drop to the 20-day moving average at $75,250, and then confirmation of the S/R flip would entail daily candle closes above the former trendline resistance. 

BTC/USDT 1-day chart. Source: TradingView

Outside of the naked price action from the candlestick chart, the long-to-short delta (heatmap below) shows longs currently with the advantage, with a -$38.6 million delta, and the figure widens to -$153 million if BTC rises to $77,500. 

BTC/USD long-short delta. Source: Hyblock

Essentially, the SR flip from the Monday US morning session liquidated long positions down to $76,500, potentially confirming the trendline resistance as support. As the price rebounds, the chart shows shorts having significantly more leveraged exposure at risk.

Related: Bitcoin shorts create $1.4B liquidation risk: Is a price squeeze to $80K next?

Bulls may succeed in pushing the price through the most immediate overhead shorts and returning BTC to its range highs below $80,000, but the aggregate orderbook set at 2.5% to 5% shows a wall of asks stacked from $79,700 to $80,000. This suggests that clearing the $80,000 level could remain a challenge in the short-term.

BTC/USDT orderbook bids and asks. Source: TRDR.io

This article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute investment advice or recommendations. All investments and trades carry risk; readers are encouraged to conduct independent research.