Polymarket has reportedly appointed a Japanese representative as the prediction market platform moves toward securing approval to operate legally in the country by 2030.

According to a Friday Bloomberg report citing people familiar with the matter, Polymarket sees Japan as a long-term expansion market even as the platform remains blocked or restricted across several jurisdictions over gambling and financial compliance concerns.

Polymarket’s list of restricted countries. Source: Polymarket website.

Leading the effort is Mike Eidlin, who Bloomberg identified as the current head of Japan at Jupiter. According to the report, Eidlin has been appointed to oversee Polymarket’s local strategy as the company begins discussions around regulatory access in the country.

At present, Japan remains on Polymarket’s restricted jurisdiction list. The platform’s website states that users from the country are blocked due to “regulatory requirements and compliance with international sanctions.”

Japanese law maintains strict restrictions on gambling activity. Under the country’s Penal Code, habitual gambling can carry prison terms of up to three years, while operating gambling businesses can result in imprisonment ranging from three months to five years. 

Government-approved horse racing and public lotteries remain exempt under existing rules, while pachinko parlors continue operating through a long-standing legal gray area tied to token exchange systems.

Polymarket pushes expansion amid rising regulatory pressure

Outside Japan, regulators have continued increasing scrutiny of prediction market platforms, particularly those tied to crypto-based payments and speculative contracts.

Earlier on Friday, Indian authorities blocked access to Polymarket after the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology instructed internet providers and VPN operators to restrict access to what officials classified as illegal online betting and prediction market services. Local outlet ThePrint reported that authorities are also preparing similar action against Kalshi, a U.S.-regulated prediction platform overseen by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Regulatory documents tied to India’s Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Act 2025 have categorized platforms that allow users to place money on uncertain outcomes as prohibited betting services, regardless of whether operators describe them as forecasting tools or researching markets.

Pressure has surfaced in other regions as well. Earlier this year, authorities in Argentina ordered internet providers to block Polymarket after a Buenos Aires court found the platform operated outside the country’s gambling framework. Colombia and Romania imposed similar restrictions last year after classifying the service as unauthorized gambling activity.

At the same time, parts of the U.S. have also moved against prediction markets tied to sports contracts. Minnesota recently became the first U.S. state to ban prediction markets, while the CFTC and the Department of Justice filed a lawsuit earlier this week challenging the state’s legislation.

Even with growing regulatory pushback, Polymarket has continued expanding its institutional presence.

Earlier this month, the company partnered with Nasdaq Private Market to launch prediction markets linked to private-company valuations, IPO timelines, and secondary-market pricing. Under the agreement, Nasdaq Private Market serves as the resolution data provider for those contracts using verified transaction data tied to private companies.

Reuters previously reported that Polymarket has also been exploring a fresh funding round that could value the company at roughly $15 billion.

Back in the U.S., Polymarket has also returned through its acquisition of federally regulated derivatives exchange QCEX. Bloomberg and other outlets have reported that the company remains in talks with the CFTC as it seeks to restore broader access to its main exchange operations in the country.

Ethereum sentiment has weakened sharply in May as traders react to price pressure, ETF outflows, Foundation exits, and slower network growth.

Santiment said Ethereum has seen a sharp shift in market mood, with its market cap down 11.6% over 15 days. The data platform said ETH is now at risk of falling below $2,000 for the first time since late March if selling pressure continues.

The report said Ethereum’s social dominance rose while price kept falling. That pattern can point to higher attention, but Santiment said the tone of discussion moved toward fear and frustration instead of optimism.

Santiment also said bullish and bearish comments about ETH moved closer to balance in May. In late April, bullish comments were still well above bearish ones. By May, the ratio had moved closer to 1.0, showing that traders had become far less confident.

ETF outflows weigh on ETH demand

ETF flows are one of the main pressure points. Santiment said several Ethereum ETF products saw outflows through May, including large exits from BlackRock-related funds. It also said no total Ethereum ETF inflow day above $50 million had been recorded in three weeks.

Related reports also show why traders are watching the $2,000 area. Earlier market coverage said Ethereum ETFs recorded more than $340 million in net outflows over six trading sessions, while ETH struggled to reclaim $2,150.

JPMorgan has also flagged weaker Ethereum demand compared with Bitcoin. The bank said Bitcoin ETFs recovered about two-thirds of recent outflows, while Ether ETFs recovered only about one-third. It also said ETH and altcoins may keep lagging without stronger DeFi activity and real-world use cases.

Foundation exits add to trader doubts

Ethereum Foundation changes have also fed the weaker mood. Recent coverage noted that Carl Beek and Julian Ma announced exits from the Ethereum Foundation, adding to broader Protocol Cluster changes.

Santiment said traders often react quickly to these narratives. It added that reports about Foundation exits and public claims about ETH supporters reducing exposure helped build the current bearish mood. Some of those claims lacked full context, but they still shaped trader behavior.

The report also noted that Ethereum remains strong in development activity. Santiment said Ethereum still leads in raw developer work, even as retail traders focus more on faster price moves from rival ecosystems.

Network growth remains the market test

Santiment said daily active addresses and network growth have cooled from stronger periods in 2024 and 2025. Fewer new wallets are interacting with Ethereum, which traders may read as a sign of weaker demand for ETH.

Ethereum was trading near $2,125 to $2,135 on May 22, based on market data crypto.news. That keeps ETH close to the support zone watched by traders after recent outflows and technical weakness.

Santiment said “Whether ETH is actually approaching one of those moments remains uncertain,” referring to whether extreme bearish sentiment could turn into a contrarian setup. For now, the market is focused on whether Ethereum can restore demand, defend the $2,000 area, and prove that network use can recover faster than trader confidence is falling.

Trump Media & Technology Group has transferred another 2,650 Bitcoin worth about $205 million to Crypto.com, adding fresh scrutiny to the company’s crypto treasury strategy as its holdings remain deeply underwater.

According to blockchain analytics platform Lookonchain, the transfer was detected from wallets linked to Trump Media, the company behind Truth Social and majority owned by the Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust. 

Although deposits to exchanges do not automatically confirm a sale, traders often treat large inflows as a possible signal that liquidation could follow.

Advertisement

Transferred funds remain in the Crypto.com wallet. Source: Arkham.

Earlier this year, Trump Media moved 2,000 Bitcoin valued at roughly $175 million when Bitcoin (BTC) traded around $87,378. Since then, the market has weakened further, with Bitcoin hovering near $77,700 at the time of the latest transfer.

Corporate treasury losses deepen

Based on Trump Media’s previous disclosures, the company originally accumulated 11,542 BTC at an average purchase price of about $118,522 per coin, spending close to $1.37 billion on the position. At current market prices, the remaining treasury has fallen well below its entry level.

Quarterly filings released by the company showed that its Bitcoin holdings had already declined to 9,542 BTC after the first transfer. Following the latest 2,650 BTC movement flagged by Lookonchain, the stash now appears to stand near 6,889 BTC.

Advertisement

Recent financial results have already shown the impact of the downturn. Trump Media reported a $405.9 million net loss for Q1 2026, with $368.7 million tied to unrealized markdowns on digital assets, pledged crypto assets, and equity securities.

Within the filing, the company disclosed that its Bitcoin holdings carried a cost basis of roughly $1.13 billion while their fair value had dropped to about $647 million by the end of March. Trump Media also disclosed ownership of around 756 million Cronos tokens linked to its partnership with Crypto.com.

What does this mean for Bitcoin?

Large exchange inflows such as these can create temporary fear among traders because visible supply on an exchange order book may act as a potential resistance zone.

However, it must also be noted that the $205 million transfer remains relatively small compared with Bitcoin’s multi-billion dollar daily spot and derivatives trading volume. For now, the market impact would depend on whether the coins are sold directly on the exchange or moved through over-the-counter channels.

Advertisement

Separately, on-chain supply data has continued to show strong long-term holder activity despite weakness among some corporate treasury buyers.

Market analytics cited in recent reports estimated that more than 70% of Bitcoin’s circulating supply has remained unmoved for over a year, suggesting long-term investors have continued holding through the current downturn.

🚨 $BTC Long Term Holders Just Flashed The Signal That Preceded Every Major Expansion Phase Since 2012.#Bitcoin The 1Y+ Long Term Holder metric has now dropped back into the historical “oversold” accumulation zone, a region that previously appeared before explosive upside… pic.twitter.com/9ZHwKFJRm9

— CryptoZeno (@CrypZeno) May 20, 2026

Advertisement

Bitcoin has fallen back toward the $77,000 region after losing a key ascending trendline support that had guided its recovery from April lows.

According to data from crypto.news, Bitcoin (BTC) price traded near $77,200 during Friday’s session after briefly losing the rising support structure that had guided its recovery from April lows. Selling pressure accelerated after Bitcoin once again failed to reclaim the $82,000 resistance area, a level that coincides with a descending local trendline and the 200-day moving average near $80,825 on the daily chart.

Over the past week, leveraged bullish positions have absorbed the bulk of the damage. According to derivatives data, nearly $661 million to $850 million in long liquidations were wiped out across exchanges as Bitcoin reversed lower from its May highs. The liquidation cascade amplified downside momentum as forced selling pushed spot prices into lower liquidity zones.

At the same time, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded roughly $1.4 billion in cumulative net outflows over the past week. It signals a sharp slowdown in institutional demand following months of post-halving accumulation. BlackRock’s IBIT reportedly registered one of its largest daily outflow sessions during the move, while other major issuers also posted consistent redemptions as traders reduced risk exposure.

On-chain flows added another bearish signal. Analysts noted that 9,664 BTC worth more than $744 million had been transferred to exchanges over the last five days, often interpreted as a sign of rising sell-side intent. Separately, on-chain tracker Lookonchain reported that Trump Media & Technology Group moved another 2,650 BTC valued at roughly $205 million to Crypto.com, further increasing market focus on potential large-holder distribution.

Adding to market sensitivity, Friday’s decline unfolded during Bitcoin Pizza Day week, a period that historically draws elevated trading activity and renewed attention to Bitcoin’s long-term gains. Instead of celebratory momentum, traders encountered rising volatility and deteriorating macro conditions.

Outside crypto markets, oil prices reintroduced another layer of pressure. WTI crude futures climbed back above $98 per barrel after reports suggested Iran’s Supreme Leader ordered enriched uranium reserves to remain inside the country, complicating ongoing negotiations with Washington.

The geopolitical dispute intensified after reports emerged that Iran and Oman were working on a framework for permanent toll systems through the Strait of Hormuz, though President Donald Trump reportedly rejected the proposal and insisted the shipping route remain unrestricted.

Even with crude oil price still down more than 3% for the week, energy traders remained cautious as U.S.–Iran negotiations showed mixed signals.

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said there were “some encouraging signs” surrounding a possible deal, while Pakistani mediators were expected to travel to Tehran during the latest review phase of Washington’s proposal.

Higher oil prices have compounded inflation concerns that were already building after recent U.S. CPI and PPI readings came in above expectations. Treasury yields climbed toward yearly highs as markets reduced expectations for aggressive Federal Reserve rate cuts. Investors are also preparing for a potential leadership transition from Jerome Powell to Kevin Warsh at the Fed, a scenario many traders associate with a more hawkish policy outlook.

Under those conditions, capital rotation away from speculative assets accelerated across global markets. Bitcoin, which had benefited from strong institutional inflows earlier this quarter, now faces a more difficult liquidity environment as investors prioritize yield-bearing instruments and reduce leveraged exposure.

Can Bitcoin hold the $76K region after losing ascending support?

Technically, Bitcoin’s daily structure has weakened after the price broke below a rising white trendline that had connected higher lows since early April. The breakdown occurred shortly after repeated rejection beneath the descending red resistance trendline near $82,000, reinforcing the formation of a lower high on the daily timeframe.

The breakdown also pushed Bitcoin beneath its 20-day moving average around $79,375 while keeping the price trapped below the 200-day moving average near $80,825.

Meanwhile, the 50-day moving average around $76,427 has emerged as the next major technical support. Daily candles are now compressing between declining short-term resistance and the rising 100-day moving average near $72,553.

The MACD histogram on the daily chart has turned negative, while the MACD line itself is beginning to cross lower beneath the signal line. Earlier bullish momentum from April’s recovery phase has faded steadily throughout May as buyers failed to produce a convincing breakout above resistance.

Liquidation data from CoinGlass suggests Bitcoin may still be vulnerable to another sweep lower before stabilization occurs. The 24-hour liquidation heatmap shows dense long liquidation clusters sitting between $76,000 and $76,500, with another concentration near $74,000. Large liquidity pockets above the current price remain concentrated near $78,000 to $79,000, potentially acting as short-term magnets during relief bounces.

Crypto trader Lennaert Snyder said Bitcoin’s daily candle had closed “pretty weak” after failing to reclaim the $78,200 highs. According to Snyder, the market remains trapped in a choppy mid-range structure, with a likely sweep of “sell-side liquidity at the $76.4K range lows” before any meaningful recovery attempt develops.

Meanwhile, Daniel Reis-Faria, CEO of ZeroStack, told crypto.news that Bitcoin’s rejection near its 200-day moving average signaled weak buying pressure.

“Bitcoin turning lower after struggling to move above its 200-day moving average suggests there still may not be enough buying to push prices higher…If buying starts to pick up again, Bitcoin can move higher pretty quickly. But until that happens, Bitcoin is likely to stay under pressure.”

Daniel Reis-Faria, CEO of ZeroStack.

Advertisement

Derivatives positioning also points to lingering caution rather than aggressive dip buying. Funding rates across several perpetual futures platforms have cooled significantly compared to earlier May levels, while open interest has fallen alongside price, signaling ongoing deleveraging instead of fresh speculative participation.

What could invalidate the bearish Bitcoin outlook?

Bitcoin’s recovery back above $79,000 would be the first sign that sellers are losing short-term control. Beyond that, Bitcoin would still need to reclaim the 200-day moving average near $80,800 and invalidate the descending resistance trendline before traders begin discussing a sustainable reversal structure.

Any breakthrough in U.S.–Iran negotiations capable of pulling oil prices lower could ease inflation concerns and reduce pressure on Treasury yields. Softer economic data or renewed expectations for Federal Reserve easing would likely improve sentiment across crypto and equity markets simultaneously.

ETF demand also remains a critical variable. Persistent outflows have weighed heavily on spot liquidity during the latest correction. A reversal back into net positive inflow territory could stabilize price action quickly, especially given how aggressively leverage has already been flushed from the system over the past week.

Failure to hold the $76,000 region, however, could expose Bitcoin to a deeper move toward the $74,000 liquidity zone highlighted on derivatives heatmaps. Below that level, traders may begin targeting the 100-day moving average near $72,500 as the next major structural support during a prolonged risk-off phase.

Polymarket’s UMA CTF Adapter contract on Polygon has reportedly been targeted in a suspected exploit, with onchain analysts warning users to pause activity.

A ZachXBT community alert said Polymarket’s UMA CTF Adapter contract on Polygon was suspected of being attacked. The alert listed losses above $520,000 and named the attacker address as 0x8F98075db5d6C620e8D420A8c516E2F2059d9B91.

PeckShield later said ZachXBT had reported that the contract had “potentially been exploited.” The security firm said two addresses, 0x871D…9082 and 0xf61e…4805, were drained of about $520,000. It also said part of the stolen funds had already moved to ChangeNOW.

Polymarket protocol contributor Shantikiran Chanal said the security reports were linked to rewards payout activity. He said user funds and market resolution are safe, adding that early findings point to “a private key compromise of a wallet used for internal operations, not contracts or core infrastructure.”

Bubblemaps warns users to pause activity

Bubblemaps also warned that a Polymarket contract had been exploited. The firm said attackers were removing 5,000 POL every 30 seconds and estimated losses at about $600,000 at the time of its alert.

PolygonScan data for 0x871D…9082 shows repeated outgoing transfers of 5,000 POL to an address tagged as Polymarket’s UMA CTF Adapter Admin. Several transfers occurred about 30 seconds apart, matching the pattern flagged by Bubblemaps.

Meanwhile, Polymarket’s documentation says the UMA CTF Adapter connects markets to UMA’s Optimistic Oracle. The adapter is used to request and retrieve resolution data for prediction markets built on the Conditional Tokens Framework.

Polymarket’s newer documentation says all outcomes on the platform are tokenized through CTF, with outcome tokens backed by locked pUSD. That makes the affected contract area relevant to how markets are created, resolved, and redeemed onchain.

This is not Polymarket’s first UMA-related controversy. Earlier coverage noted that a UMA whale allegedly influenced a Polymarket market outcome tied to a Trump-Ukraine mineral deal, raising questions over oracle voting power and market resolution trust.

Attack comes as Polymarket expands

The incident comes as Polymarket has been moving from a crypto-native prediction platform into a larger market structure debate. Recent crypto.news coverage said prediction markets led by Polymarket and Kalshi have grown into one of finance’s fastest-moving sectors.

The platform has also faced regulatory and market-design pressure. Earlier coverage noted Wisconsin’s lawsuit against Polymarket, Kalshi, Coinbase, Robinhood, and Crypto.com-linked entities, arguing some prediction markets function as unlicensed gambling products.

The suspected exploit adds a new technical risk layer to that debate. Polymarket is already watched for questions around regulation, resolution rules, and market integrity. A contract-level incident now puts user safety and smart contract controls back in focus.

The latest alert also follows a wider run of DeFi security incidents. Recent reports covered Echo Protocol’s paused bridge after unauthorized eBTC minting, while the Verus Ethereum bridge case took a different turn after the exploiter returned 4,052 ETH, following an $11.5 million forged-transfer attack.

Solana price has recovered from recent market weakness, with bulls now attempting to overcome double-top resistance near the $100 level.

Across the crypto market, risk appetite improved modestly after Bitcoin reclaimed ground above $77,000 following several sessions of macro-driven weakness tied to geopolitical tensions and volatility in oil markets.

The rebound helped major altcoins recover intraday losses, although traders remain cautious ahead of further U.S. inflation data and Federal Reserve commentary that could influence liquidity conditions across risk assets.

At the same time, institutional activity surrounding Solana has continued to strengthen despite the recent correction. A fresh catalyst emerged after Morgan Stanley reportedly refiled a Solana ETF product with staking support under the “MSOLsec” ticker, adding to growing expectations that regulated SOL investment vehicles could eventually mirror the success of spot Bitcoin and Ethereum products.

The filing arrived as asset managers continue expanding their exposure to staking-enabled crypto funds in search of yield-bearing digital assets.

Meanwhile, capital inflows into Solana-linked investment products have remained comparatively resilient during May’s choppy trading conditions. Products managed by firms such as Bitwise continued attracting attention from institutional allocators even as several other altcoins experienced declining flows.

Analysts say the ability of Solana products to maintain steady demand during a corrective phase suggests longer-term positioning rather than speculative short-term trading.

On-chain fundamentals have also remained constructive. In April 2026, Solana-based DePIN ecosystems generated a record combined revenue of roughly $2.9 million, according to ecosystem tracking data.

Projects including Helium, Render, and Hivemapper contributed heavily to the surge as decentralized infrastructure demand continued expanding across AI compute, mapping, and wireless connectivity markets.

Enterprise adoption narratives have continued building underneath the market. Payment giant Visa has already integrated Solana infrastructure into parts of its stablecoin settlement operations, while Meta has reportedly explored USDC-based creator payouts utilizing Solana rails. Traders increasingly view these commercial integrations as a long-term valuation support layer that differentiates Solana from purely speculative Layer-1 ecosystems.

Can Solana break through its double-top resistance structure?

Solana remains trapped beneath a significant resistance zone after forming another local double-top pattern on both the daily and weekly timeframes. The charts show repeated rejection near the $95 to $100 region, an area that has capped upside attempts multiple times since late 2025.

On the daily chart, Solana (SOL) continues trading below the 200-day moving average near $107.89, while short-term moving averages around $86–$89 are beginning to flatten. Price action has compressed into a tight consolidation range after rejecting near $98 earlier this month, suggesting bulls and bears remain locked in a directional battle.

Momentum indicators have weakened but have not fully rolled over into bearish territory. The MACD histogram on the daily timeframe remains negative, although selling momentum has gradually faded over the past several sessions. Weekly MACD readings have also started stabilizing after months of persistent downside pressure, raising the possibility of a medium-term trend reversal if buyers reclaim higher resistance levels.

From a structural perspective, traders are closely monitoring the 0.382 Fibonacci retracement region between $87 and $90. Analysts view sustained closes above that area as an early confirmation that Solana may be transitioning out of its post-double-top consolidation phase. A breakout above $90 could expose liquidity near $95 before opening the path toward the key psychological barrier at $100.

According to analyst Javon Marks, Solana is once again holding a long-term support area that previously triggered explosive rallies. In a recent market update, Marks said one historical rebound from the level generated an 80% rally while another produced gains exceeding 270%.

“With prices showing strength off of this support level again, we are watching for an over 165% climb to test a key technical level at $233.8 again,” Marks wrote in a May 22 X post.

Beyond directional price action, derivatives positioning suggests a sharp volatility move could emerge if resistance levels begin failing. CoinGlass liquidation heatmaps show dense liquidation clusters concentrated between $90 and $95, with another large band sitting just above current price levels.

A decisive move into that region could trigger forced short liquidations and accelerate upside momentum through a classic squeeze setup. Market data cited by traders indicates short sellers recently absorbed nearly five times more liquidation pressure than longs.

Open interest has also started rising gradually after several weeks of deleveraging, suggesting traders are rebuilding directional positions ahead of a potential breakout attempt. Funding rates, while not excessively bullish, have stabilized near neutral territory, a setup many derivatives traders consider healthier than heavily crowded long positioning.

Meanwhile, Solana’s total value locked has shown signs of stabilizing after months of contraction. Analysts tracking on-chain liquidity argue that a sustained TVL recovery would likely strengthen spot demand for SOL tokens while reinforcing confidence in Solana’s decentralized finance ecosystem. Historically, periods of expanding TVL have coincided with stronger medium-term price performance for SOL.

What could invalidate Solana’s bullish breakout thesis?

Despite improving sentiment, several downside risks continue threatening the bullish setup. The most immediate concern remains Bitcoin’s fragile position near major support levels as global macro uncertainty continues pressuring risk assets.

Oil markets remain highly sensitive to developments surrounding U.S.-Iran negotiations and shipping disruptions near the Strait of Hormuz. Any renewed spike in crude prices could reignite inflation concerns and reduce expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts, creating another wave of risk-off pressure across crypto markets.

At the same time, Solana’s technical structure still carries meaningful bearish risk unless buyers reclaim the $95–$100 resistance band decisively. Repeated rejections beneath double-top resistance often weaken bullish momentum over time, particularly if accompanied by declining spot demand.

Failure to hold the $84–$85 support region could expose lower liquidity zones near $80 and potentially reopen the path toward the March lows. CoinGlass heatmap data already shows notable downside liquidation pockets sitting below current prices, meaning volatility could accelerate rapidly if sellers regain control.

The longer-term weekly chart also shows SOL continuing to trade well below its 2025 highs despite recent stabilization. Until the asset reclaims the major breakdown region near $104, some traders may continue treating rallies as temporary relief bounces within a larger bearish market structure.

Still, improving institutional narratives, expanding enterprise adoption, growing DePIN revenues, and mounting short-side leverage continue giving bulls a credible case for another breakout attempt.

If Bitcoin stabilizes and macro conditions avoid further deterioration, Solana may soon test whether the market still has enough momentum to finally clear the stubborn double-top ceiling and reclaim triple-digit territory.

In 2025, stablecoins settled more transactions than Visa. Real-world stablecoin payments doubled to $400 billion. Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, PayPal, and Western Union all turned on stablecoin rails inside their existing products. The GENIUS Act became U.S. law. And almost no one outside crypto noticed. The most important shift in the global payments system in twenty years happened in plain sight, and it is still being misread as a crypto story.

The biggest story in crypto is not about crypto

Strip away the meme coins, the price predictions, the ETF flow charts, and the regulatory drama. The single most consequential thing happening in digital assets right now has nothing to do with any of it. It is not Bitcoin. It is not even speculation. It is the quiet, accelerating absorption of stablecoins into the actual plumbing of how the world moves money.

Some numbers, because the numbers are the story.

The global supply of fiat-backed stablecoins crossed $319 billion in April 2026, up from roughly $7 billion six years earlier. A forty-fold expansion in an asset class that did not meaningfully exist before 2020. Adjusted stablecoin transaction volume grew ninety-one percent in 2025 to $10.9 trillion, closing in on Visa’s $14.2 trillion. By Plasma’s accounting, total settlement volume hit $33 trillion last year, past Visa’s annual throughput. Stablecoins processed roughly twenty times the volume PayPal did. Morph’s research projects that 2026 stablecoin settlement could top $50 trillion.

While crypto Twitter argues about Bitcoin versus Ethereum, two superpowers are quietly running a different race. The United States is using dollar-backed stablecoins to extend the dollar’s reach into every corner of the digital economy. China is using its e-CNY and the mBridge platform to build an alternative settlement system that bypasses the dollar entirely. The outcome will shape the next century of global finance. And almost nobody outside policy circles is paying attention.

The argument that misses the actual fight

Open any crypto publication this year, and you will find some version of the same debate. Bitcoin maximalists versus Ethereum supporters. Solana versus Ethereum. Layer ones versus layer twos. The tribal warfare is loud, it is entertaining, and it is mostly beside the point.

While that argument fills the timelines, a different and far more consequential race is being run by people who do not post memes. The United States Treasury and the People’s Bank of China are competing to define what money looks like for the next century. They are doing it in plain sight, in policy documents and central bank press releases, with two completely different theories of the case.

The American theory: extend the dollar’s reach into every digital corner of the global economy by privatizing it, regulating it, and shipping it on open networks. The Chinese theory: build a sovereign digital currency under direct state control, and link it together with friendly central banks into a parallel settlement system that does not need American rails at all.

This is the real race. It will decide whether the global financial system of the 2030s and 2040s stays dollar-denominated and U.S.-administered, or whether it splits into competing blocs with different reserve assets, different settlement rails, and different rules. The stakes are not the price of a token. They are the architecture of money itself.

What the United States is actually doing

The American strategy is easier to miss because it is being run by the private sector with regulatory blessing rather than by a central bank. But the strategy is explicit, and it has been spelled out at the highest levels of the U.S. Treasury.

The instrument is the stablecoin. The framework is the GENIUS Act, signed into law in July 2025. The thesis was stated bluntly by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent: stablecoins are a way to “extend the dollar’s reach” in decentralized finance and cross-border payments. Crypto commentator Arthur Hayes has put it more starkly. Stablecoins, in his framing, work as on-ramps that redirect offshore liquidity into U.S. Treasury bills. Every USDT or USDC in circulation requires reserves, and those reserves sit mostly in dollar-denominated assets. Tether alone now holds roughly $113 billion in U.S. Treasuries as of Q1 2026. The stablecoin sector, in aggregate, has become one of the largest non-sovereign buyers of U.S. government debt.

This is not an accident. It is the strategy. By making it easy, legal, and trusted to hold a dollar-pegged token on any blockchain in the world, the United States has effectively privatized dollar issuance and shipped it through global crypto networks. A small-business owner in Lagos who takes payment in USDT, a remittance recipient in Manila who saves in USDC, and a Lebanese citizen who holds stablecoins because the local currency is collapsing are each, without knowing it, deepening dollar penetration into their local economies. They are also indirectly financing the U.S. Treasury market.

The numbers are now large. Fiat-backed stablecoin supply crossed $319 billion in April 2026. Adjusted transaction volume hit $10.9 trillion in 2025, with some estimates putting total settlement volume past $33 trillion, more than Visa. Roughly ninety-nine percent of fiat-backed stablecoin value is pegged to the dollar. The euro, the yuan, the yen, and every other currency together account for the remaining one percent. In digital money, the dollar is not winning. It has, so far, lapped the field.

The genius of this approach, from the U.S. perspective, is that it works without the political baggage of a U.S. central bank digital currency. There is no Federal Reserve digital dollar to argue about. There is no surveillance state implication. There is only a regulated private sector building products that happen to pour offshore savings into U.S. debt and pull the global digital economy toward dollar-denominated settlement. The state does not have to build the rails. It just has to make them legal and trusted.

The GENIUS Act is the legal scaffolding. It defines payment stablecoins as a distinct regulated category, requires one-to-one reserve backing in high-quality liquid assets, opens issuance to banks under OCC supervision, and creates a U.S.-supervised path that competes structurally with foreign stablecoins. Tether’s planned U.S. domestic stablecoin launch fits this pattern. So does the Trump administration’s USD1 stablecoin, marketed openly as a “digital dollar for the world.” The U.S. is not building one digital dollar. It is building an entire ecosystem of them, each privately issued, each pushing toward the same outcome.

What China is actually doing

China is running a different play, executed by the state directly and aimed at a different goal.

The e-CNY, the digital yuan, is the world’s largest live central bank digital currency. By late 2025, cumulative transaction value had crossed $2.3 trillion. Twenty-nine pilot cities have integrated it into public transit and retail. 180 million wallets have been created. Domestic adoption still trails Alipay and WeChat Pay, but the gap is closing, and on January 1, 2026, the People’s Bank of China made a structural change that rewrote the asset’s economic logic.

Until that date, the e-CNY was classified as M0, basically digital cash, and could not earn interest. From January 1, 2026, banks are permitted to pay interest on verified digital yuan wallets, and the e-CNY is treated as a deposit-like instrument with commercial banks as counterparties. The currency is now covered by China’s national deposit insurance. In plain language: the e-CNY went from a digital substitute for paper money to a digital substitute for a bank account. The incentive to hold it just got dramatically larger.

That domestic change is half the story. The other half is happening across borders.

Project mBridge, the cross-border CBDC platform jointly developed by the People’s Bank of China, the Bank for International Settlements, and the central banks of Thailand, the UAE, and Hong Kong, processed over $55 billion in transactions by late 2025. The e-CNY accounts for more than 95 percent of mBridge settlement volume. Cross-border e-CNY activity overall reached roughly $2.38 trillion by November 2025, an 800 percent expansion since 2023. China launched its e-CNY International Operation Center in Shanghai in September 2025. Pan Gongsheng, the PBOC governor, has explicitly framed the goal as building “a more multi-polar monetary system less vulnerable to politicization.” It is a polite way of saying: a system the United States cannot weaponize.

This article was updated with a liquidation heatmap from Coinglass.

NEAR Protocol has rallied more than 44% from its weekly low as AI-driven momentum, protocol upgrade optimism, and aggressive short liquidations pushed the token toward a major technical breakout.

According to data from crypto.news, NEAR Protocol (NEAR) climbed from a weekly bottom near $1.47 to an intraday high of $2.10 before extending gains toward the $2.20 region on Thursday. The move came even as Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) traded within a subdued range following renewed concerns over U.S. inflation and uncertainty surrounding the Federal Reserve’s next policy decision.

A renewed wave of capital rotation into artificial intelligence-linked crypto assets has emerged as one of the key catalysts behind NEAR’s outperformance. Nvidia’s stronger-than-expected quarterly earnings earlier this week reignited speculative demand across AI infrastructure tokens, particularly projects tied to decentralized compute, AI agents, and data privacy.

Adding to the momentum, NEAR AI rolled out an automated Personally Identifiable Information anonymization framework on May 20. The feature strips sensitive user information from prompts before they interact with external large language models, addressing enterprise concerns surrounding data leakage and compliance risks.

Market participants also reacted positively to Network Upgrade 2.13, scheduled for June. The upgrade introduces post-quantum cryptographic signing alongside automated dynamic resharding through NEAR Intents. Developers say the system will allow the network to scale database shards automatically during traffic spikes, potentially reducing congestion and improving institutional-grade throughput.

At the same time, derivatives activity around NEAR accelerated sharply. Data from CoinGlass showed open interest surging more than 63% over the past 24 hours to $629 million while funding rates flipped strongly positive, signaling an aggressive build-up in leveraged long positioning.

Meanwhile, liquidation data from CoinGlass pointed to a significant short squeeze unfolding above the $2 level. Heatmap clusters showed dense liquidation zones stacked between $2.05 and $2.18, many of which were triggered as NEAR pushed through key resistance levels during the rally.

NEAR 24-hour liquidation heatmap. Source: Coinglass.

The latest move also coincided with improving sentiment across the altcoin market following continued inflows into U.S. spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs earlier this week. Although macro conditions remain fragile, ETF demand has helped stabilize risk appetite after several weeks of heavy volatility tied to rising oil prices and geopolitical tensions in the Middle East.

Oil markets remained elevated after ongoing uncertainty surrounding shipping activity near the Strait of Hormuz continued to fuel inflation concerns. Higher crude prices have complicated the Federal Reserve’s path toward rate cuts, with traders now pricing in a prolonged higher-for-longer interest rate environment.

Despite those macro headwinds, several analysts believe AI-linked crypto assets may continue attracting speculative flows independently from the broader market direction. Michaël van de Poppe, founder of MN Consultancy, recently said the AI sector remains “one of the strongest narrative trades” in crypto due to rising institutional interest in decentralized compute infrastructure.

Is a golden cross setting up a larger NEAR breakout?

On the daily chart, NEAR has broken above a descending trendline that had capped price action since late January. The breakout accelerated after buyers reclaimed the Murrey Math 7/8 resistance zone near $2.14, which had previously acted as a key reversal level during multiple failed rallies earlier this year.

More importantly, the 50-day moving average appears close to crossing above the 200-day moving average. A confirmed golden cross would signal the first major bullish trend reversal on NEAR’s daily timeframe since late 2025.

The chart also shows NEAR reclaiming the 4/8 major support and resistance pivot at $1.56 earlier this month before rapidly advancing through the 5/8 and 6/8 Murrey Math zones. Bulls are now attempting to establish support above the 7/8 “weak stop and reverse” level around $2.14.

Should buyers maintain control above that region, the next major upside target sits near the 8/8 resistance zone around $2.34. A breakout above that level could open the door toward the +1/8 overshoot area near $2.53, followed by the +2/8 extreme overshoot level around $2.73.

From a broader structure perspective, reclaiming the psychological $3 level would require sustained momentum beyond the +3/8 reversal zone near $2.93. Notably, NEAR has not traded above $3 on a sustained basis since the sharp correction that followed the AI-token rally earlier this year.

Momentum indicators have also strengthened considerably during the latest breakout. The MACD recently flipped bullish on the daily timeframe while price continues holding firmly above the 50-day moving average, currently positioned near $1.43.

According to CoinGlass liquidation data, another sizable cluster of short liquidations remains stacked between $2.30 and $2.40. A decisive move through that area could trigger another wave of forced buybacks from overleveraged bearish traders.

At the same time, elevated funding rates suggest parts of the market may already be becoming overheated in the short term. Historically, aggressive leverage build-ups following vertical rallies often increase the probability of sharp volatility spikes or temporary pullbacks.

What could invalidate the bullish NEAR thesis?

Although the technical structure has improved significantly, several downside risks remain in play.

A rejection below the $2.14 resistance zone would weaken the immediate breakout thesis and potentially expose NEAR to a pullback toward the $1.95 support region. Losing that level could shift momentum back toward the 5/8 Murrey Math support around $1.75.

Macro conditions also remain a major risk factor for the crypto market. Another upside surprise in U.S. inflation data or further escalation in Middle East tensions could strengthen the U.S. dollar and pressure risk assets, particularly high-beta altcoins.

Meanwhile, Bitcoin’s inability to reclaim major resistance levels continues limiting broader altcoin participation. A sharp correction in BTC below key support zones could quickly erase speculative momentum across AI-linked tokens, including NEAR.

Derivatives positioning presents another concern. While rising open interest and positive funding rates initially supported the rally, excessively crowded long positioning increases liquidation risk if momentum stalls. In such scenarios, cascading long liquidations often amplify downside volatility.

For now, however, NEAR remains one of the strongest-performing large-cap altcoins in the market, with traders closely watching whether the approaching golden cross and sustained AI narrative momentum can eventually fuel a move back toward the $3 psychological level.

Intercontinental Exchange and OKX are teaming up to list perpetual oil futures that track ICE Brent and WTI benchmarks on the crypto exchanges derivatives platform.

The contracts will reference the same benchmarks that underlie multi trillion dollar cleared futures on ICE, according to Bloomberg, but will be listed as non expiring swaps on OKX’s venue with funding payments to keep prices aligned with the underlying oil curves.

For now the trading will be limited to jurisdictions where OKX already has permission to offer perpetual futures, which means the products are likely to launch outside the United States even as ICE markets them to institutions used to regulated commodity exposure.

That split structure allows ICE to monetise its benchmark data and deepen a 25 billion dollar strategic tie up with OKX without immediately seeking US approval for 24 hour oil perps on its own exchanges.

The deal sits on top of a broader partnership under which ICE took a minority stake in OKX, secured a board seat and agreed to license its US futures and tokenised equities markets back into the crypto exchange, which serves more than 120 million accounts.

Under that March agreement ICE plans to launch US regulated crypto futures based on OKX spot prices while OKX in turn expects to offer access to ICE’s US futures suite and New York Stock Exchange linked tokenised stocks once regulators sign off.

Will OKX and ICE’s 24/7 oil perps redraw the line between Wall Street and crypto?

Market observers see the oil perpetuals as a logical extension of that blueprint, inserting real world commodities into a crypto native leverage and funding model that retail traders already use for Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) exposure on OKX’s derivatives books.

For readers tracking large cap assets, Bitcoin and Ethereum prices, liquidity conditions and derivative flows are already covered in depth on dedicated pages at crypto news, which provide context for how new products like oil perps can bleed into broader digital asset volatility and funding markets.

What does this mean for crypto and commodity regulation

The move lands in the middle of a political and regulatory fight over whether perpetual futures on US linked commodities should be allowed for American users at all, and if they are, who should host them.

CME and ICE have pushed US officials to crack down on platforms like Hyperliquid that list WTI linked perps for global users with little classical oversight, framing the issue as a question of market integrity and surveillance rather than a pure turf war.

At the same time both exchanges are nudging regulators toward a world of 24 hour trading, with ICE’s NYSE working on a tokenised securities platform funded by stablecoins and designed for round the clock access that looks very similar in structure to the crypto venues they are publicly criticising.

In that context the OKX deal reads less like a sideline experiment and more like a live test case for hybrid market structure.

ICE supplies regulated benchmarks and governance while OKX contributes the perpetual engine, user interface and experience running high leverage derivatives with up to 125 times leverage in some markets.

If regulators tolerate oil perps tied to regulated benchmarks offshore, it strengthens the case for bringing similar products onshore in a controlled way; if they clamp down, the episode will underline how far commodity regulators are willing to go to keep price discovery anchored in listed futures rather than in offshore crypto contracts.

One person familiar with the thinking told Bloomberg that a large energy trading firm put it bluntly, saying that traders “want the same benchmarks and margin offsets they already use at ICE, but with the flexibility of crypto style funding and around the clock risk management,” a view that captures the logic behind the tie up even as the regulatory path remains uncertain.

For readers looking to understand how this clash between traditional derivatives and digital assets is evolving beyond oil, detailed coverage of Bitcoin markets, Ethereum staking and the rise of perpetual futures across major coins is available on crypto news, including explainers on how funding rates, open interest and cross margining can transmit stress between commodity perps and large cap crypto contracts.

Those dynamics matter because an oil shock expressed through leveraged perps can now move through balance sheets that also hold Bitcoin or Ethereum collateral, tightening the coupling between energy and crypto in ways that macro traders and regulators will have to model rather than ignore.

“We are seeing the convergence of two infrastructures that used to live in separate universes,” said a derivatives strategist at a European prop firm who asked not to be named because they are not authorised to speak publicly. “If you clear oil futures at ICE during the day and trade perpetuals on OKX at night, that is one risk system, not two.”