Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

BitGW’s Single-Sided AMM Model Highlights a More Collaborative Direction for Crypto Liquidity

Published

on

As the crypto market continues to mature, Automated Market Makers (AMMs) are no longer seen solely as tools used by decentralized exchanges. Increasingly, they are becoming part of a broader shift in market structure, where trading platforms combine algorithmic liquidity with centralized execution.

BitGW has been operating a single-sided AMM model for several years, reflecting this evolution. While early AMMs—widely associated with platforms like Uniswap—reshaped how liquidity is created in crypto, newer models are beginning to focus not only on efficiency, but also on accessibility, sustainability, and how value is distributed among participants.

From Traditional AMMs to Single-Sided Liquidity

Early AMM systems typically required users to provide two assets into a liquidity pool. That structure made decentralized trading possible at scale, but it also introduced practical challenges. Users needed to manage paired assets, track price movements across both sides, and accept the possibility of impermanent loss.

Single-sided AMM models take a different approach. Instead of requiring two tokens, they allow users to participate with just one asset. This simplifies the process and lowers the barrier for users seeking liquidity-based returns without managing a more complex pool structure.

Advertisement

BitGW’s long-running implementation of this model shows how the concept can extend beyond purely decentralized environments.

A Hybrid Model Rather Than a Replacement

Rather than positioning AMMs and order books as competing systems, the market is increasingly moving toward hybrid designs. In this structure, AMM logic contributes to pricing and liquidity formation, while centralized infrastructure provides execution depth, speed, and stability.

BitGW’s model reflects this direction. Its single-sided AMM framework operates within a broader trading environment, combining simplified liquidity participation with the advantages of centralized exchange architecture.

This makes single-sided liquidity more accessible, particularly for users who may be interested in participating but are less inclined to manage the complexity of traditional dual-token AMMs.

Advertisement

Where the Model Becomes More Meaningful

What makes this structure notable is that the AMM functions not only as a trading mechanism, but also as part of a broader revenue and incentive framework.

BitGW’s revenue structure spans multiple sources, including spot trading fees, swap transactions, AMM operations, and additional mechanisms such as spread capture and asset utilization. These components are directly linked to trading activity and form part of standard exchange infrastructure.

Within this structure, LP participation is connected to the value generated by market activity on the platform. As trading volume and liquidity interaction increase, liquidity providers benefit from the underlying flow they support.

This linkage between trading activity and liquidity participation reflects a model focused on consistency and long-term operational sustainability.

Advertisement

Profit Sharing as a Cooperative Mechanism

One of the more distinctive aspects of the single-sided AMM framework is how it connects platform activity with user returns.

When users add liquidity, they contribute to the infrastructure supporting trading flow. As that activity grows, LPs share in the value generated within the system. This shifts liquidity provision from a purely technical role to a more active form of participation in the platform’s operating economy.

Such a structure is becoming increasingly relevant in today’s market, where users are paying closer attention not only to yield levels, but also to how that yield is generated and whether the underlying mechanism is sustainable.

For BitGW, this supports a “cooperation rather than extraction” narrative: the platform grows with liquidity, and liquidity providers grow alongside the platform.

Advertisement

Why Single-Sided AMMs May Matter More Going Forward

As crypto infrastructure evolves, the industry is moving beyond the earliest generation of AMMs. The question is no longer only whether AMMs work, but which models are better suited for broader adoption.

Single-sided designs are gaining attention because they reduce friction, simplify participation, and integrate more naturally with hybrid exchange environments. For platforms seeking both scalability and usability, this approach may prove more practical than traditional dual-token systems alone.

BitGW’s multi-year operation of a single-sided AMM model points in this direction. It suggests that the future of liquidity may not lie in choosing between centralized and decentralized systems, but in combining them in ways that are more efficient, more accessible, and more aligned with participant interests.

About BitGW

BitGW is a digital asset trading platform focused on developing advanced liquidity infrastructure and delivering efficient trading solutions for global users. The platform has also emphasized compliance and regulatory alignment in earlier updates to its AML and KYC framework.

Advertisement

The post BitGW’s Single-Sided AMM Model Highlights a More Collaborative Direction for Crypto Liquidity appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Bitcoin steadies above $68K as Iran tensions keep markets on edge

Published

on

A bearish Bitcoin PA
A bearish Bitcoin PA

Key takeaways

  • Bitcoin is holding near $69K as Iran-related geopolitical tensions keep markets cautious.
  • Rising oil prices and inflation concerns are limiting upside, but strong ETF inflows and institutional support are helping BTC stay resilient.

Bitcoin is trading sideways near the $69,000 mark as investors remain cautious amid escalating geopolitical tensions tied to the conflict in Iran.

The leading cryptocurrency briefly pushed above $70,000 on Monday—its first move past that level since March—but failed to sustain momentum. 

Geopolitics dominate market sentiment

The ongoing situation in Iran continues to shape global risk appetite. U.S. President Donald Trump has warned of severe consequences if a deal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz is not reached by the Tuesday 20:00 ET deadline.

Iran has rejected a proposed 45-day ceasefire, instead calling for a permanent end to hostilities alongside the removal of sanctions.

Advertisement

For Bitcoin, this macro backdrop is significant—higher oil prices tend to support inflation, push Treasury yields higher, and reinforce expectations that the Federal Reserve will keep interest rates elevated for longer.

Despite the current situation, Bitcoin has held up better than some traditional markets. While it has not staged a breakout, its ability to maintain levels above $65,000 suggests underlying support from positioning and institutional demand.

Meanwhile, Gold has lost more than 10% of its value as investors scale back expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts this year.

Flows into spot Bitcoin ETFs have been a key factor. After four consecutive months of outflows, March saw $1.2 billion in net inflows. Momentum has continued into April, with spot ETFs recording $471.3 million in inflows in a single day—the largest since February.

Advertisement

These inflows have helped keep Bitcoin’s price, although resistance near $76,000 continues to cap upside.

For Bitcoin to break higher, a clear catalyst is likely required. A confirmed ceasefire between the U.S. and Iran could be pivotal, particularly if it drives oil prices below $100 per barrel and alleviates inflation concerns.

Technical forecast: Bitcoin eyes the $70k resistance once again

The BTC/USD 4-hour chart remains bearish and efficient as Bitcoin continues to defend the $65,000 support level. 

The price has recovered from this low and is testing resistance around 69k, the 50-day EMA, and the lower band of the rising channel. 

Advertisement

The RSI of 61 on the 4-hour chart is above the neutral level, indicating a growing bullish bias. The MACD lines are also above the zero line, adding further confluence to the bullish narrative. 

Buyers will need to rise above $69,000 to bring $74,000 into focus, the mid-point of the rising channel and the falling trendline resistance dating back to October’s $126,000 record high. 

BTC/USD 4H Chart

A surge above the $74,000 resistance level would allow BTC to test the March high of $76,000 in the near term. 

However, failure to rally higher would see the bears push the price towards the $65,000 support level once again.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

XRP Captures $119M as Digital Asset Funds Post $224M Weekly Inflows

Published

on

Brian Armstrong's Bold Prediction: AI Agents Will Soon Dominate Global Financial

Key Highlights

  • XRP attracts record $119M, dominating weekly digital asset investment flows

  • Ethereum suffers continued decline with $52M withdrawal amid policy concerns

  • Bitcoin records $107M inflows while bearish positioning expands significantly

  • Swiss markets dominate global flows as American investor appetite weakens

  • Economic data triggers late-week reversal in cryptocurrency investment momentum

Cryptocurrency investment products attracted $224 million in fresh capital over the past week, representing a short-lived bounce following previous withdrawals. However, macroeconomic headwinds dampened enthusiasm as the week concluded. XRP emerged as the clear winner while Ethereum’s outflow streak extended.

XRP Commands Investment Flows with Record Weekly Performance

[[LINK_START_0]]XRP[[LINK_END_0]] captured the lion’s share of investment activity, pulling in $119.6 million during the week. This represented the digital asset’s most impressive showing since late December 2025. The momentum persisted even as broader cryptocurrency markets displayed vulnerability. Year-to-date, XRP has accumulated $159 million in net inflows.

The impressive performance followed sustained investor interest after the introduction of spot XRP exchange-traded products in American markets. These investment vehicles enhanced accessibility and facilitated continuous capital movement into the asset. Consequently, XRP now represents approximately seven percent of aggregate assets managed across cryptocurrency funds.

European financial centers played a significant role in driving XRP’s success. Switzerland emerged as the top contributor with more than $157 million in capital inflows, while Germany and Canada also participated strongly. This geographic distribution indicated evolving capital deployment strategies across international cryptocurrency markets.

Advertisement

Bitcoin Displays Conflicting Trends as Investor Sentiment Splits

Bitcoin attracted $107.3 million in new investments, demonstrating modest revival following earlier capital withdrawals. However, monthly performance remained in negative territory, with cumulative outflows reaching $145 million. This divergence underscored persistent indecision regarding the asset’s trajectory.

Inverse bitcoin products drew $16 million in capital, revealing heightened pessimistic positioning among certain market participants. Simultaneously, American spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds contributed minimally to overall flows. These contradictory indicators exposed a fundamental divide in investor outlook.

Meanwhile, Solana accumulated $34.9 million in inflows, extending its positive momentum throughout the current year. Its aggregate inflows now constitute roughly ten percent of total managed assets. This reliable performance reinforced broader portfolio diversification trends within digital asset investment products.

Ethereum Suffers Substantial Withdrawals Amid Legislative Uncertainty

Ethereum maintained its negative trajectory, experiencing $52.8 million in weekly capital flight. This followed an even larger $222 million exodus the preceding week. The asset’s year-to-date outflows have now reached $327 million.

Advertisement

Legislative ambiguity surrounding the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act continued exerting downward pressure on Ethereum-focused investment vehicles. The proposed legislation remained gridlocked in the Senate due to disputes regarding stablecoin yield components. This impasse negatively impacted sentiment toward Ethereum’s ecosystem positioning.

Ethereum’s fundamental importance to stablecoin infrastructure heightened its vulnerability to regulatory developments. This strategic exposure amplified pressure on capital movements during periods of policy ambiguity. Ethereum stood out as the poorest performer among leading cryptocurrency assets.

Broader economic conditions also shaped overall investment product activity throughout the period. Robust American retail sales figures reinforced projections of continued restrictive monetary policy. This evolution diminished risk tolerance and prompted modest withdrawals as the week closed.

Simultaneously, rising crude oil valuations and receding interest rate reduction expectations intensified market headwinds. These dynamics interrupted early-week positive momentum across digital asset investment vehicles. Ultimately, the weekly recovery proved incomplete and varied substantially across geographic regions and individual assets.

Advertisement

 

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

DATs Need Liquid Staking to Outperform ETH Staking ETFs: Lido Exec

Published

on

DATs Need Liquid Staking to Outperform ETH Staking ETFs: Lido Exec

Ether treasury companies may need to use liquid staking and other active yield strategies if they want to offer investors something beyond the staking rewards already available through listed Ether products, Kean Gilbert, head of institutional relations at Lido, told Cointelegraph at ETHCC 2026.

Liquid staking lets Ether (ETH) holders stake their tokens while receiving a transferable token that can still be deployed elsewhere in decentralized finance (DeFi).

Gilbert said strategies such as posting ETH as collateral and borrowing against it could help treasury companies generate higher returns than passive staking products.

US-listed staked ETH products now include the REX-Osprey ETH + Staking ETF, launched in September 2025, Grayscale’s Ethereum Staking ETF and Ethereum Staking Mini ETF, and BlackRock’s iShares Staked Ethereum Trust ETF, introduced on March 12.

Advertisement

Issuer disclosures show different staking economics across Ether products, making direct yield comparisons difficult. Grayscale’s ETHE page showed 2.26% net staking rewards as of April 6, while Grayscale’s ETH page showed 2.56% as of April 2. Native ETH staking was yielding about 2.72% annually, according to Staking Rewards.

Related: Bitmine paper loss nears $8.8B as Ether slump tests cyclical thesis

Still, Jimmy Xue, co-founder and chief operating officer of quantitative yield platform Axis, said Ether treasury companies do not necessarily need to beat staked Ether products on headline yield because they are different investment vehicles.

“A staked ETH ETF is a passive vehicle. A DAT trading at a meaningful mNAV premium is promising something a passive ETF structurally cannot deliver, which is active, dynamic deployment of spot inventory across opportunities as they arise.”

“The mNAV premium investors pay reflects confidence in management’s ability to put that treasury to work,” Xue said, adding that basis trading is a major yield source for treasury companies.

Advertisement
Kean Gilbert, head of institutional relations at Lido Finance, interviewed by Cointelegraph at ETHcc. Source: Cointelegraph

Public filings show liquid staking adoption

Public disclosures show several Ether treasury firms using staking or liquid-staking-related strategies, though the level of detail varies by company.

Sharplink Gaming, the second-largest corporate Ether holder, has generated 14,516 ETH (around $30.8 million) in staking rewards as of March. It derived 33% of these rewards from liquid staking and 66% from native staking, according to a March 1 filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission.

Sharplink reported a $734 million net loss for 2025, largely driven by the sharp crypto market downturn in the second half of the year.

BTCS Inc. SEC filing. Source: SEC.gov

BTCS Inc., the 10th-largest Ether treasury company by returns, has also staked a part of its Ether holdings through the liquid staking protocol Rocket Pool. Out of its total 29,122 ETH holdings, the company has liquid staked 4,160 ETH ($8.8 million) through Rocket Pool nodes, according to a July 2025 SEC filing.

Cointelegraph has approached BitMine, SharpLink and The Ether Machine for comment on the role of liquid staking in their strategies.

Advertisement

Magazine: Sharplink exec shocked by level of BTC and ETH ETF hodling — Joseph Chalom