Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

BlackRock Blocks $580M in Withdrawal Requests from HPS Corporate Lending Fund

Published

on

Nexo Partners with Bakkt for US Crypto Exchange and Yield Programs

TLDR:

    • BlackRock blocked $580M in withdrawal requests after its HPS fund hit the 5% quarterly redemption cap limit. 
    • The $3 trillion private credit market faces a structural mismatch between investor liquidity needs and long-term loan terms. 
    • Blue Owl and BlackRock both faced heavy withdrawal pressure, pointing to possible tightening across private lending markets.
    • Weakening labor markets and slower consumer spending are raising corporate debt repayment risks across private credit portfolios.

BlackRock, one of the world’s largest asset managers with $10 trillion under management, has restricted withdrawals from its $26 billion HPS Corporate Lending Fund.

Investors submitted $1.2 billion in redemption requests, equal to 9.3% of the fund’s total assets. The fund paid out $620 million before reaching its 5% quarterly redemption cap. The remaining withdrawal requests were then blocked through a mechanism known as a redemption gate.

The Structure Behind Private Credit Funds

Private credit funds lend directly to companies that cannot access traditional bank financing. These loans typically carry interest rates between 8% and 12% per year.

The loans last between three and seven years and are not traded on any public market. That makes them less liquid than standard investment products.

This creates a structural mismatch between investor withdrawal expectations and long-term loan schedules. Investors in these funds often expect short-term or periodic access to their money.

Advertisement

However, the underlying corporate loans are locked into multi-year repayment timelines. That tension becomes clear when many investors attempt to withdraw capital at once.

As BullTheory.io pointed out, the fund paid $620 million but blocked the rest once it hit the 5% cap. That cap is a built-in protection called a redemption gate. It limits how much capital can leave the fund within a single quarter. It protects the fund’s overall stability.

The private credit market has grown to roughly $3 trillion in total size. Much of that growth followed the 2008 financial crisis, when companies turned away from traditional bank lending.

BlackRock’s HPS Corporate Lending Fund is among the largest vehicles operating in this space today. The market now plays a central role in corporate financing.

Credit Conditions Show Signs of Tightening

The broader private credit market is now facing growing pressure from economic shifts. The labor market is weakening, and layoffs are increasing across several sectors.

Advertisement

Consumer spending is also slowing. These changes tend to reduce corporate revenue, which makes debt repayment harder for many borrowers.

When corporate revenues slow, companies that rely on borrowed capital face a higher risk of missing loan payments. That raises the overall credit risk within private lending portfolios. As that risk rises, more investors are likely to seek early withdrawals from the funds holding those loans.

@BullTheoryio raised the question of whether these events signal broader tightening across the private lending market. BlackRock is not the only fund to face this situation.

Blue Owl Capital also experienced heavy withdrawal pressure before the BlackRock redemption gate made headlines. Two major funds showing this pattern within a short time is worth watching closely.

Advertisement

If more companies struggle to repay loans while investors seek to exit at the same time, stress will not stay limited to individual funds.

It tends to spread through connected parts of the lending system. The events at BlackRock and Blue Owl may be the early stage of a broader credit cycle.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Ansem Says Ethereum Is in a Worse Spot Than 2023 as Thesis Weakens

Published

on

Ethereum Price Prediction

Crypto analyst Ansem argues that Ethereum (ETH) is in a “worse spot” in 2026 than it was in 2023, pointing to a thesis he says has been eroding for years.

His bearish take drew rebuttals from some members of the community. Meanwhile, on-chain activity and technical indicators elsewhere on the network flash bullish signals.

Ansem Lists Cracks in the ETH Thesis

Ansem argues that Solana (SOL) has dominated retail activity this cycle. Hyperliquid has taken the lead in perpetual futures trading, while rollups have failed to gain traction.

He also noted that Vitalik Buterin “publicly abandoned” the general-use rollup thesis. The ongoing Aave (AAVE) situation around the KelpDAO rsETH exploit, Ansem said, is a mark on  Ethereum’s core value proposition of “safety + security of defi & insto interest.

Advertisement

“ETH thesis has been weakening consistently for years,” the analyst wrote. ETH in 2026 is in a worse spot than it was in 2023, amplified by AI doing extremely well & tech stocks being much more favorable investments with real revenues / emerging narratives / increasing momentum, ETH is a $300B asset with a ton of overhang from Tom Lee topblasting + complacent ETH holders sitting idle in defi protocols.”

Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens

Technically, the analyst noted that ETH remains in a sustained downtrend after failing to break multi-year resistance. He projected that the second-largest cryptocurrency could slip to 2025 lows near $1,300 and to the bear-market lows from 2022.

“Tight invalidation 2377 assuming problems worsen if you want to play it loose assuming other risk assets continues doing well & drags it up probably somewhere around 2700/2800 invalidation fundamentals wise would want to see breakout activity from some new vertical,” the post read.

Ethereum Price Prediction
Ethereum Price Prediction. Source: X/Ansem

Community Members Push Back

The take triggered notable pushback. Ryan Berckmans accused Ansem of not understanding fundamentals. Leo Lanza went further, sharply dismissing the analyst’s bearish case on X.

Another user pointed to a 56% drop in the SOL/ETH pair this cycle.

Advertisement

“Soleth is down 56% after being up 12x+ *this cycle* because one guy decided to buy 5% of the eth supply after it had underperformed all cycle. idk why you guys act like i dont also bearpost solana i havent posted anything bullish about sol in over a year,” Ansem replied.

Not everyone shares the bearish view on Ethereum. BeInCrypto recently highlighted that network activity remains strong, while technical indicators like the Rainbow Chart and MACD are also flashing bullish signals.

With macro and geopolitical uncertainty still in play, the question is whether ETH slides further this year or stages a renewed rally.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel to watch leaders and journalists provide expert insights

The post Ansem Says Ethereum Is in a Worse Spot Than 2023 as Thesis Weakens appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Aave’s TVL Falls $8B After $293M Kelp DAO Hack

Published

on

Aave’s TVL Falls $8B After $293M Kelp DAO Hack

Total value locked on decentralized lending protocol Aave dropped by nearly $8 billion over the weekend after hackers behind the $293 million Kelp DAO exploit borrowed funds on Aave, leaving roughly $195 million in “bad debt” on the protocol and triggering withdrawals.

Data from DeFiLlama shows that Aave’s TVL fell from about $26.4 billion to $18.6 billion by Sunday, losing the top spot as the largest DeFi protocol. 

Aave v3’s lending pools for USDt (USDT) and USDC (USDC) are now at 100% utilization, meaning that more than $5.1 billion worth of stablecoins cannot be withdrawn until new liquidity arrives or borrows are repaid. 

$2,540 is available to be withdrawn from the $2.87 billion USDT pool on Aave v3 at the time of writing. Source: Aave

Aave’s TVL fall shows how rapidly risk from a single security incident can spread throughout the broader, interconnected DeFi lending market, potentially leading to a severe liquidity crisis.

The incident began on Saturday when hackers stole 116,500 Kelp DAO Restaked ETH (rsETH) tokens worth about $293 million from Kelp DAO’s LayerZero-powered bridge and used them as collateral on Aave v3 to borrow wrapped Ether (wETH).

Advertisement

Crypto analytics platform Lookonchain said the move created about $195 million in “bad debt” on Aave, which contributed to the Aave (AAVE) token tanking nearly 20% from $112 on Saturday at 6:00 pm UTC to $89.5 about 25 hours later. 

Lookonchain noted that some of the largest crypto whales to withdraw funds from Aave were the MEXC crypto exchange and Abraxas Capital at $431 million and $392 million, respectively.

Source: Grvt

Several crypto networks and protocols tied to rsETH or the LayerZero bridge have paused use of the bridge until the problem is resolved, including DeFi platform Curve Finance, stablecoin issuer Ethena and BitGo’s Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC).

Aave has frozen several rsETH, wETH markets

Shortly after the Kelp DAO exploit, Aave said it froze the rsETH markets on both Aave v3 and v4 to prevent any suspicious borrowing and later stated that rsETH on Ethereum mainnet remains fully backed by underlying assets.

WETH reserves also remain frozen on Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base, Mantle and Linea, Aave said.

Advertisement

This incident marks the first significant stress test of Aave’s “Umbrella” security model, which was introduced in June 2025 to provide automated protection against protocol bad debt while enabling users to earn rewards.

Related: Aave DAO backs V4 mainnet plan in near-unanimous vote

Earlier this month, the Bank of Canada found that Aave avoided bad debt in its v3 market by using overcollateralization, automated liquidations and other strategies that shifted risk to borrowers.

In comments to Cointelegraph, Aave defended its liquidation-based model, framing it as a core safety mechanism that protects lenders while limiting downside for borrowers.

Advertisement

It comes as Aave parted ways with its longest-standing DeFi risk service provider, Chaos Labs, on April 6, following disagreements over the direction of Aave v4 and budget constraints.

Magazine: Are DeFi devs liable for the illegal activity of others on their platforms?