Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

BNB Price Prediction: Price Drops, But Bullish Signals Flashing

Published

on

BNB Price Prediction: Price Drops, But Bullish Signals Flashing

BNB price is down, dropping by 3% in 24 hours to under $630, but the technical prediction tells a more complicated story than the red candle suggests. A pullback from the March 17 peak of $675 has rattled short-term holders, yet longer-dated moving averages are quietly trending upward.

BNB is still holding the third-largest market cap among non-stablecoin cryptocurrencies, sitting above $85 billion, ahead of XRP’s $84 billion and Solana’s $50 billion. That ranking reflects the combined weight of Binance’s centralized exchange dominance and BNB Chain’s expanding DeFi footprint.

No major protocol announcements or regulatory catalysts have emerged yet, meaning price action here is largely technical.

With consolidation tightening and April seasonality historically favorable, broader crypto market conditions could accelerate BNB’s next directional move faster than most expect.

Advertisement

Discover: The best crypto to diversify your portfolio with

BNB Price Prediction: Can Binance Coin Reclaim $725 This Month?

BNB opened March 26 at a $600 area, hit an intraday high of $629 a tight range, signaling indecision. However, the seven-day picture shows a decline from $645, a consolidation phase following the spike to $685 on March 16. Support appears to be building around the $620 zone and resistance clusters between $650 and $675.

Advertisement

The moving average picture offers the bullish counterargument. Both the 50-day and 200-day MAs are sloping upward as of March 21, a structural positive. The 4-hour frame remains bearish relative to its MAs (that’s the friction point right now), creating a classic higher-timeframe bull, lower-timeframe bear setup.

BNB’s all-time high of $1,370 in October last year remains a longer-term reference point. At $630, it’s trading at less than half that peak, which either means deep value or a structurally weakened asset, depending on your time horizon.

Discover: The best pre-launch token sales

Advertisement

Bitcoin Hyper Targets Early Mover Upside as BNB Tests Key Levels

BNB upside target sounds compelling, until you account for its $88 billion market cap. Large-cap altcoins face a size problem: the capital required to move the needle is enormous, and the percentage gains that defined 2024 cycles are structurally harder to replicate. That math is exactly why early-stage infrastructure plays attract traders who’ve already captured large-cap exposure.

Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) is one presale drawing attention in that context. It’s positioned as the first-ever Bitcoin Layer 2 with Solana Virtual Machine (SVM) integration, targeting the three core limitations that have defined Bitcoin for years: slow transactions, high fees, and the near-absence of programmable smart contracts.

The architecture claims to deliver faster performance than Solana itself, while preserving Bitcoin’s underlying security. The project has already raised more than $32 million at a current price of $0.0136776, with staking rewards of 36% APY for early participants.

Advertisement

For those who’ve done the research: explore Bitcoin Hyper here.

This article is not financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research before making any investment decisions.

The post BNB Price Prediction: Price Drops, But Bullish Signals Flashing appeared first on Cryptonews.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

MemeCore price jumps 40% as leverage and whale flows fuel memecoin comeback

Published

on

Coin Center presses Senate to keep dev protections in BRCA bill

MemeCore spikes 40% to $2.31 as leverage and sector-wide memecoin rebound push its value above $3 billion.

MemeCore (M), a high‑beta memecoin project focused on on‑chain speculation and community‑driven rewards, is trading at approximately $2.31 today, with a live market cap of about $3.01 billion and 24‑hour trading volume of $33.03 million. According to CoinMarketCap, M’s price has climbed 39.78% over the past 24 hours, with intraday lows and highs at $1.69 and $2.47 respectively as of March 26, 2026. Derivatives data from CoinGlass shows a further $2.21 million in spot volume and roughly $85.7 million in futures volume over the same period, underscoring a heavy speculative footprint in MemeCore’s order books.

Advertisement

CoinMarketCap lists M with a circulating supply near 1.3 billion tokens, a fully diluted valuation around $24.1 billion, and total supply capped at 10 billion M. Those tokenomics position MemeCore firmly within the memecoin vertical rather than as a DeFi, L1, or AI protocol, aligning it with other high‑risk assets like PEPE and BONK that have seen similar liquidity‑driven surges covered by outlets such as crypto.news. Earlier this month, MEXC reported MemeCore’s market cap crossing $3 billion on a 16.6% daily move from $1.47 to $1.72, with 24‑hour volume at just $12.9 million, highlighting thin liquidity relative to its valuation.

CoinGlass data indicate that MemeCore’s futures volume now outpaces spot by more than 38:1, with $85.7 million in futures changing hands versus roughly $2.21 million on spot markets in the last 24 hours. That skew suggests leveraged traders are driving much of the latest leg higher, rather than long‑only spot accumulation. At the same time, CoinGecko reports daily trading volume around $11.4 million and a 12.80% increase from one day ago, signalling a sharp pick‑up in activity alongside the price spike.

The MemeCore move sits inside a broader shift back into the memecoin trade at the start of 2026. MEXC notes that the CoinGecko GMCI Meme Index value recently climbed to about $33.8 billion in total sector market cap, with $5.9 billion traded in 24 hours, marking a 23% rise in memecoin capitalization as speculative appetite returned following a holiday lull. Gate.io’s March overview of “notable memecoins” highlights how names like SIREN and other BNB‑aligned memes have delivered triple‑digit monthly growth, reinforcing a rotation into high‑volatility tokens.

For readers tracking live prices, MemeCore’s latest quote and market cap can be followed on the crypto.news price page for MemeCore, while related profiles of other meme tokens such as PEPE and BONK are available on the same crypto.news market‑cap dashboard for cross‑comparison within the sector. In addition, recent crypto.news coverage of memecoin rallies, BNB Chain ecosystem flows, and speculative leverage in altcoins provides background on how MemeCore’s surge fits into this year’s risk‑on narrative across the meme segment.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Mochi Finance founder offloads 550K CVX as fraud claims deepen across DeFi

Published

on

Crypto fear index increases as traders dump XRP, Solana and DeFi bets

Mochi founder Azeem Ahmed sold 550K CVX from a Curve-linked stash as on-chain probes allege over $8M in diverted rewards and $54M in DeFi losses.

Azeem Ahmed, founder of Mochi Finance and GaiaDAO, has sold approximately 550,285 Convex Finance (CVX) tokens from wallets linked to a 2021 Curve Finance drain, netting around $946,000 and triggering a double‑digit intraday slide in CVX’s price. On March 19, the tokens were liquidated at an average price of about $1.72, sending CVX from roughly $1.88 to $1.68, a drop of more than 10% according to on-chain data reviewed by Crypto Daily. The proceeds were routed to a multisig associated with the Mochi protocol, which held about $864,858 in assets after the sale, while another 500,000 CVX remain locked on Convex Finance.

The CVX position itself originates from Mochi’s controversial November 2021 move to mint its USDM stablecoin against MOCHI and drain roughly $46 million in DAI-equivalent liquidity from the USDM/3CRV pool on Curve. At the time, Mochi used 10 billion MOCHI tokens—assigned a hard‑coded oracle price despite near‑zero market value—to mint 46 million USDM, convert the proceeds into 9,876 ETH, and purchase about 1,050,285 CVX, which were then locked on Convex Finance, according to certified crypto‑trace reports by forensics firm IFW Global. Curve’s Emergency DAO responded by killing Mochi’s gauge and blocking further emissions after characterizing the maneuver as a “clear governance attack,” a clash that became part of the broader “Curve Wars” over CVX and CRV voting power and emissions.

Advertisement

In the aftermath, Ahmed re-emerged through GaiaDAO with a Peg Rebalancing Module (PBM) pitched as a mechanism to distribute CVX staking rewards from the locked position to USDM holders and gradually restore the stablecoin’s peg. The PBM charged a 2% management fee and 20% performance fee payable to Ahmed, but according to Curve governance forum records, he unilaterally hiked the performance fee to 50% before community backlash forced him to reverse the change. By November 2025, reward distributions from the 1,050,285 vlCVX position had stopped entirely, and on-chain data indicates those rewards were rerouted to a wallet that also acts as a signer on the CVX multisig, with the value of diverted staking rewards alone estimated at more than $1.6 million.

Beyond staking flows, investigators allege that about 2,198 ETH—worth roughly $6.67 million at the time—and $471,429 in USDC were drained from Mochi/ETH liquidity pools and never returned to depositors, while airdrops from protocols including Prisma, CNC, VELO, LFT, and YB reportedly remained unclaimed or undistributed. Aggregate investor losses tied to the Mochi ecosystem and its associated pools are now estimated at over $54 million, according to IFW Global’s certified reports.

Ahmed’s track record stretches back to at least 2020 and spans Yieldfarming.insure (SAFE), Armor.fi, Mochi Finance, and GaiaDAO, with repeated accusations of misappropriating community funds. During the original Mochi‑Curve confrontation, Curve alleged that Mochi’s strategy amounted to a governance attack, while Ahmed insisted in an interview with Crypto Briefing that the team had simply taken a “bold approach to gaining voting power in the DAO” and argued that the “DeFi Cartel … feels threatened that a small player on the outskirts” could challenge incumbents. Robert Forster, Ahmed’s former co‑founder at Armor.fi, later accused him publicly of stealing “millions in LP tokens,” a charge Ahmed denied by claiming the funds were “returned in full” and counter‑alleging that Forster had taken money for personal use.

Advertisement

Legal pressure has also followed the on‑chain drama into courts. A prior lawsuit by an Armor.fi user in San Francisco Superior Court (Chen v. Ahmed, Case No. CGC‑21‑589609) ended in an out‑of‑court settlement after a temporary restraining order application, according to filings referenced in IFW Global’s reports. Attorneys now point to potential U.S. claims spanning securities fraud under Section 10(b), racketeering (RICO), common‑law fraud, conversion, and unjust enrichment, and affected investors have been directed to file complaints with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and the FBI’s IC3 portal.

Ahmed’s March 19 liquidation is the most aggressive on-chain move from Mochi‑linked wallets since the 2021 Curve incident and is being read by many affected investors as confirmation that the locked CVX will be used for exit liquidity rather than restitution. With roughly 500,000 CVX still locked on Convex Finance and controlled via the same governance structure, any further sales could become major liquidity events for CVX and reignite questions over how DeFi protocols respond when governance power is acquired through exploits rather than open‑market buying. Ahmed, described in IFW documentation as a UK citizen, has not publicly responded to the latest allegations, and his social media profiles have been inactive for months.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Treasury Plans to Add Donald Trump’s Signature to US Currency

Published

on

Treasury Plans to Add Donald Trump’s Signature to US Currency

US President Donald Trump is set to become the first sitting president in history to have his signature put on US paper currency.

In an announcement on Thursday, the US Department of the Treasury said the move would mark the 250th anniversary of the US. It will put both Trump and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s signatures on future US notes.

“There is no more powerful way to recognize the historic achievements of our great country and President Donald J. Trump than U.S. dollar bills bearing his name, and it is only appropriate that this historic currency be issued at the Semiquincentennial,” Bessent said.

Until now, the tradition has been to put the signatures of the treasurer and the Treasury secretary on US paper currency. This move would mark the first time in history that a sitting president is placing his signature on US currency.

Advertisement
Source: Brandon Beach

According to a report from Reuters on Thursday, the first $100 bills with Trump and Bessent’s signatures will be printed in June, with other bills following in later months.

Trump’s name and likeness have also made their way to cryptocurrencies, famous landmarks and commemorative coins.

Alongside the Treasury’s plans to put Trump’s signature on US notes, there are also potentially $1 coins with the president’s face on them that could enter circulation as part of the US’s 250th anniversary.

In late 2025, the US Mint released three proposed designs bearing Trump’s face and the caption “In God We Trust.”

Proposed $1 coin designs. Source: US Mint

Trump has also helped oversee the renaming of major US landmarks such as the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts. 

The board of the Kennedy Center, reportedly filled with Trump appointees, voted in late December to change the name to the “Donald J. Trump and the John F. Kennedy Memorial Center for the Performing Arts.”

Advertisement

Related: SEC is no longer a ‘cop on the beat’ on crypto, says US lawmaker

This has prompted pushback, however, with lawmakers arguing that the move is illegal when done without authorization from Congress.