Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

BTC tops $79,000 as crypto rally accelerates; MSTR, COIN, CRCL jump

Published

on

BTC price and average perp funding rates (K33)

Bitcoin climbed above $79,000 on Wednesday, hitting its strongest level since early February as a long-awaited breakout attempt gathered momentum.

The largest crypto rose 4.5% over the past 24 hours, leading major altcoins ether (ETH), BNB , Solana (SOL) and XRP higher. The broad-market CoinDesk 20 Index advanced 3.5%.

Crypto-linked stocks also rose. Strategy (MSTR), the largest corporate BTC holder, jumped 10% while stablecoin issuer Circle Internet (CRCL) gained 9% and crypto exchange Coinbase (COIN) rose 6%. Bitcoin miners MARA Holdings (MARA) and Riot Platforms (RIOT) added 6%-7%.

The broader macro backdrop also turned supportive. The S&P 500 rose 0.9%, and the Nasdaq added 1.3% to record highs, extending the risk-on environment.

Advertisement

The gains followed U.S. President Donald Trump’s remark late Tuesday that he would extend the Iran ceasefire while maintaining a naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz. Still, uncertainty around peace talks remains.

“BTC’s near-term direction remains highly dependent on macro and geopolitical developments,” said Paul Howard, a senior director at Wincent. He pointed to $72,000 as key support, with upside potentially could be capped near $80,000 range as traders take profits.

Bitcoin short squeeze potential

While macro risks are still in place, derivatives positioning could fuel the rally higher.

Perpetual swap traders remain heavily skewed bearish, with seven-day funding rates at near three-year lows, noted Vetle Lunde, head of research at K33 Research. At the same time, open interest continues to trend higher, suggesting fresh leverage is entering the market.

Advertisement
BTC price and average perp funding rates (K33)

“Rising leverage alongside deeply negative funding suggests shorts are steadily building in perps, increasing both the likelihood and potential magnitude of a short squeeze,” he wrote.

“We continue to see strong breakout potential for BTC, with concentrated shorts providing ample fuel for a move higher,” Lunde added.

The $80,000 area, however, carries additional weight for bitcoin. It aligns with the short-term holder realized price — a measure of the average cost basis for newer market participants, who tend to be more sensitive to volatility and more likely to sell into strength.

For now, BTC is testing that hurdle. A clean move above it could signal stronger conviction behind the rally, but failing to hold could invite renewed selling pressure and profit-taking from shorter-term holders.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Kalshi bars three U.S. lawmakers from betting on their own races

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

Three political hopefuls faced penalties on Kalshi’s prediction market platform after findings that they placed bets on the outcomes of their own races. The sanctions—fines and a five-year ban for each—illustrate the ongoing push to curb insider trading and unlawful activity in political wagering on prediction markets.

Kalshi fined two congressional candidates and one sitting lawmaker: Matt Klein, Ezekiel Enriquez, and Mark Moran. Klein, a Minnesota state senator, was fined $539 for wagering on his primary race in his bid for the U.S. House, with the August primary cited. Enriquez, who sought a U.S. House seat in March, received a $784 penalty. Moran, a Virginia Senate candidate, was hit with a $6,229 fine and ordered to return any profits from his trades after allegedly refusing to cooperate with Kalshi in the settlement process. All three were banned from Kalshi for five years. For the notices and settlements, Kalshi’s published documents can be reviewed via the platform’s regulatory notices.

These actions come as prediction markets—platforms that let users trade contracts on real-world event outcomes—face heightened scrutiny over insider trading and potential gambling-law concerns. Kalshi and Polymarket, the two largest actors in this niche, have each pledged to tighten controls and clamp down on unlawful activity.

Key takeaways

  • Kalshi levies five-year bans and monetary penalties on three politicians who bet on their own races, underscoring a hard line against insider trading in political markets.
  • The sanctioned amounts are $539 for Matt Klein, $784 for Ezekiel Enriquez, and $6,229 plus disgorgement for Mark Moran, with all three banned from Kalshi for five years.
  • Kalshi’s enforcement head states these cases violated exchange rules and did not warrant referrals to the CFTC or DOJ, signaling a self-contained compliance approach.
  • The crackdown fits into a broader industry push for stricter standards, following earlier sanctions and ongoing regulatory attention on political prediction markets.

Three cases, one policy impulse: dissecting Kalshi’s enforcement

The enforcement notices detailing Klein, Enriquez, and Moran’s actions lay out a straightforward premise: wagers tied to political outcomes by individuals with direct stakes in those outcomes violate Kalshi’s rules and are subject to penalties and bans. Klein, a Minnesota state senator, wagered on his own primary as he pursued a seat in the U.S. House. He subsequently paid a $539 penalty and accepted a suspension, noting that he initially wagered out of curiosity and later learned it violated platform rules. He also co-sponsors Minnesota Senate Bill SF4511, which seeks to ban wagers on real-world events such as elections or policy decisions.

Enriquez, who ran for a U.S. House seat in March, accepted a $784 penalty as part of a settlement with Kalshi. Moran’s case, by contrast, involved a larger financial penalty—$6,229—with the added requirement to disgorge any profits from his trades after he allegedly refused to cooperate with Kalshi during the process. Each case ended with a five-year platform ban, a common consequence in Kalshi’s ongoing effort to discipline insider-trading behavior on its markets.

Advertisement

Kalshi’s enforcement stance was articulated by Bobby DeNault, the company’s head of enforcement. He said these cases violated exchange rules but did not meet the threshold for referral to federal regulators like the CFTC or DOJ. The message, according to Kalshi, is clear: any trade that can influence a market by a candidate’s status—whether large or small—will be punished under its rules.

For context, Kalshi has not been alone in this tightening approach. In February, the platform issued a $2,000 fine and a five-year ban to a former California gubernatorial contender for betting on his own candidacy last year, illustrating a broader pattern of swift disciplinary action in the space. In the industry’s broader coverage, Kalshi and Polymarket have both faced investigations and public scrutiny around insider trading and the governance of political bets, with outlets highlighting the ongoing need for robust controls.

Links to the official settlement notices and enforcement updates illuminate the specifics of each case. Klein’s notice, Enriquez’s notice, and Moran’s disciplinary action are publicly posted by Kalshi, providing a rare level of transparency into how these actions are determined and applied. The notices underscore a disciplined approach to policing conflicts of interest and ensure platform users understand that political bets by candidates themselves are not tolerated.

Context, consequences, and what to watch next

The visible discipline on Kalshi’s platform reflects a broader question facing the market: how can prediction markets remain useful for information discovery while guarding against manipulation or perceived illegality in electoral outcomes? The penalties for Klein, Enriquez, and Moran come amid rising regulatory attention to political wagering and insider trading concerns, prompting platform operators to shore up compliance and oversight mechanisms.

Advertisement

The enforcement actions also intersect with policy debates on the legality and governance of prediction markets. In Minnesota, Klein’s co-sponsorship of SF4511 signals continued interest in banning bets tied to real-world events, including elections and policy decisions, which could influence how state actors view predictions markets as a tool for civic engagement or as a potential venue for inappropriate bets. Observers will want to see whether more lawmakers push for similar restrictions or additional guardrails for prediction-market platforms.

As the industry seeks to balance openness with safeguards, readers should monitor whether Kalshi and its peers expand their internal controls, how regulators respond to evolving market structures, and whether additional sanction reports surface in the coming months. The incidents involving Klein, Enriquez, and Moran are part of a larger trend toward stricter enforcement in political prediction markets, a trend that could shape how investors, traders, and builders approach participation, transparency, and compliance in this fast-evolving corner of the crypto ecosystem.

Related background and references: Kalshi’s enforcement updates and settlement notices detailing each case, including links to the official PDFs, as well as prior enforcement actions and broader industry coverage of prediction-market scrutiny.

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

DOJ Charges SPLC With Fraud

Published

on

Texas AG Sues ActBlue for Fraud

The US Department of Justice has filed fraud charges against the Southern Poverty Law Center, alleging the civil rights organization made secret payments to extremist informants without proper disclosure.

Summary

  • The DOJ charged the SPLC with fraud, alleging undisclosed payments were made to informants embedded in extremist groups.
  • The charges represent one of the most significant legal actions ever taken against a major US civil rights organization.
  • The SPLC has not yet issued a detailed public response to the allegations.

The US Department of Justice announced a federal indictment against the Southern Poverty Law Center on April 21, with acting Attorney General Todd Blanche alleging the group had been paying informants embedded inside white supremacist and other extremist organizations while concealing those payments from donors. The indictment, returned by a grand jury in Alabama, includes six counts of wire fraud, four counts of making false statements to a federally insured bank, and one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering.

DOJ SPLC Fraud Charges Shake the Civil Rights World

According to prosecutors, the SPLC secretly paid leaders and organizers of groups including the Ku Klux Klan, the Aryan Nation, and the National Alliance, using shell accounts under fictitious names to funnel the money and avoid detection. NPR reported that one informant who was a member of the neo-Nazi National Alliance received more than $1 million in payments between 2014 and 2023, while another allegedly helped coordinate transportation to the deadly 2017 Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville and was paid approximately $270,000. “As the indictment describes, the SPLC was not dismantling these groups. It was instead manufacturing the extremism it purports to oppose by paying sources to stoke racial hatred,” Blanche said at a press conference announcing the charges.

Advertisement

What the Charges Allege

The DOJ alleges the SPLC used funds in ways inconsistent with its stated nonprofit mission and that the organization failed to maintain adequate records of payments made to informants, according to NBC News which covered the charges in detail. Prosecutors have not specified the total amount allegedly involved, but the case centers on a pattern of payments rather than a single transaction. The SPLC has disputed elements of the government’s account but has not issued a comprehensive public defense as of the time of publication.

Broader Implications for Nonprofits and Civil Rights Groups

The charges are being closely watched across the nonprofit sector, where organizations that engage in undercover monitoring of extremist groups often walk a legal and ethical line in how they fund and manage informants. NPR reported that the case could set a precedent for how civil rights organizations document and disclose intelligence-gathering activities going forward. For the SPLC, which has an endowment of several hundred million dollars and significant political influence, the legal battle ahead carries both financial and reputational stakes.

The DOJ has not indicated whether additional individuals within the SPLC’s leadership structure face charges, but the investigation is described as ongoing.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

ABTC Energizes More Than 11,000 New Bitcoin Mining Rigs

Published

on

Mining, Bitcoin Mining, Companies

American Bitcoin (ABTC), a publicly traded mining company co-founded by United States President Donald Trump’s sons, has completed its energization of 11,298 application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) at its Drumheller site in Alberta, Canada.

Following the acquisition of machines, the company now owns about 89,242 ASICs, the computers used to mine Bitcoin (BTC) and other proof-of-work (PoW) cryptocurrencies, according to the company’s announcement on Wednesday.

ABTC’s mining fleet now generates a total of about 28.1 exahashes per second (EH/s) of computing power, operating at an “average efficiency” of 16 joules per terahash, the company said.

Shares of ABTC surged by about 11.7% on Wednesday, rising to about $1.38 per share, according to data from Yahoo Finance.

Advertisement
Mining, Bitcoin Mining, Companies
ABTC’s share price surged following the announcement. Source: Yahoo Finance

The announcement followed a tough business quarter for the company, which posted a loss of $59.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2025, as the mining industry grapples with multiple economic challenges that are chipping away at revenue.

Related: Aluminum giant Alcoa to sell dormant smelter to Bitcoin miner NYDIG: Report

ABTC struggles amid challenging business environment for miners

Mining companies are grappling with reduced block rewards since the April 2024 halving, rising energy costs, and declining crypto prices from the ongoing crypto bear market.

The price of BTC declined by over 50%, reaching a low of about $60,000 in February, when ABTC filed its Q4 results with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

ABTC attributed its Q4 losses to a $227.1 million decline in the fair value of its BTC holdings as a result of the crash, but said it was able to “mine BTC at a 53% discount” to prices on the spot market.

Advertisement
Mining, Bitcoin Mining, Companies
American Bitcoin’s total reserve holdings of Bitcoin and Satoshis, the smallest unit of BTC, per share. Source: Company filing

Public BTC mining companies sold more BTC in the first three months of 2026 than all of 2025. 

Mining companies MARA, CleanSpark, Riot, Cango, Core Scientific and Bitdeer collectively sold about 32,000 BTC in Q1, according to TheEnergyMag.

Sales in the period topped the previous record of 20,000 BTC sold by public mining companies during Q2 2022.

Magazine: AI may already use more power than Bitcoin — and it threatens Bitcoin mining