Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

China’s Crypto Ban Just Got Worse For Stablecoins and RWAs

Published

on

Total Value of Assets in Real-World Asset (RWA) Tokenization.

China’s top financial regulators have significantly extended the existing crypto ban. This expansion specifically targets stablecoin issuances and the tokenization of real-world assets.

The joint notice was released Feb. 6 by eight agencies, including the People’s Bank of China and the China Securities Regulatory Commission. It represents the most aggressive tightening of capital controls since the landmark 2021 prohibition on Bitcoin mining and trading.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Advertisement

Beijing Shuts Offshore Loopholes in New Stablecoin Rules

The regulatory agencies cited a recent surge in virtual asset activities as a direct threat to the country’s financial stability and monetary sovereignty.

Under the new rules, foreign entities are strictly prohibited from offering stablecoin or tokenization services to Chinese residents.

Perhaps more significantly, the crackdown targets the “offshore loophole” by banning domestic firms and their overseas branches from issuing digital currencies without explicit government approval.

The PBOC emphasized that stablecoins, particularly those pegged to fiat currencies, carry attributes of sovereign money.

Advertisement

In light of this, the authorities argued that these private digital assets undermine the state’s ability to control the money supply. They further claimed these assets circumvent strict anti-money-laundering and customer-identification protocols.

Specifically, the notice prohibits any entity from issuing Renminbi-pegged stablecoins abroad, a move analysts see as a defense of the e-CNY, China’s official central bank digital currency.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Advertisement

RWA Tokenization Targeted

The directive also targets the burgeoning $24 billion Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization sector.

Total Value of Assets in Real-World Asset (RWA) Tokenization.
Total Value of Assets in Real-World Asset (RWA) Tokenization. Source: RWA.xyz

The regulators reclassified unauthorized tokenization—such as fractionalized ownership of real estate or securities—as “illegal public security offerings” and “unauthorized futures business.”

“Real-world asset tokenization activities within China, as well as providing related intermediary and information technology services, which are suspected of involving illegal token issuance, unauthorized public offerings of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures businesses, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, should be prohibited,” the notice stated.

The notice leaves a narrow path for activities conducted on government-approved financial infrastructure.

However, it requires any firm pursuing tokenization abroad to meet heightened compliance standards and obtain domestic clearance.

To enforce these measures, the central government plans to launch a collaborative framework that integrates local and national oversight.

Advertisement

The coordinated approach aims to eliminate the regulatory arbitrage previously used by Chinese tech and finance firms. These companies often utilized neighboring jurisdictions to experiment with blockchain-based assets outside of Beijing’s direct oversight.

By tightening the tether on both stablecoins and RWAs, Beijing has signaled that the next generation of digital finance must remain entirely within state-sanctioned, permissioned systems.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Ripple Researchers Propose Privacy-Preserving Transfers for XRPL Multi-Purpose Tokens

Published

on

The Ripple research team has published a paper on adding transaction privacy to the XRP Ledger (XRPL). 

The paper introduces Confidential Transfers for Multi-Purpose Tokens (Confidential MPTs). The goal is to enable institutional and regulated use cases, with issuer controls such as freezing and clawbacks.

Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens

The paper is authored by Murat Cenk, Aanchal Malhotra, and Joseph Ayo Akinyele. The Confidential MPTs would be a cryptographic extension of the XLS-33 token standard, which went live on the XRPL mainnet in October 2025

The protocol replaces plaintext per-account balances with EC-ElGamal ciphertexts. Furthermore, it uses non-interactive zero-knowledge proofs to enforce transfer correctness and balance sufficiency without requiring decryption by validators. 

Meanwhile, sender and receiver identities remain visible, preserving XRPL’s account-based model

“To accommodate regulatory and institutional requirements, Confidential MPTs provide cryptographic auditability through an on-chain selective-disclosure model based on multi-ciphertext balance representations and equality proofs, while remaining compatible with simpler issuer-mediated audit models,” the abstract reads.

The timing aligns with shifting regulatory attitudes toward on-chain privacy. In a recent report submitted to Congress in early March, the US Treasury Department acknowledged that lawful users of digital assets may rely on mixers when transacting on public blockchains.

Advertisement

The privacy paper arrives as Ripple simultaneously strengthens the network’s security foundation. The firm recently outlined an AI-driven security strategy for XRPL.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel to watch leaders and journalists provide expert insights

The post Ripple Researchers Propose Privacy-Preserving Transfers for XRPL Multi-Purpose Tokens appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

DeFi Tokens Face Pressure as CLARITY Act Targets Stablecoin Yields

Published

on

Brian Armstrong's Bold Prediction: AI Agents Will Soon Dominate Global Financial

Key Takeaways

  • Proposed legislation would prohibit stablecoins from generating yields, limiting them to payment functions exclusively
  • The change would redirect yield opportunities toward traditional banking and money market instruments
  • Popular DeFi platforms including Uniswap, Aave, and Compound may encounter stricter regulations on value distribution
  • Trading volumes, liquidity depth, and token demand across DeFi could decline significantly
  • Regulated stablecoin issuers like Circle stand to gain from tighter integration with payment systems

The most recent iteration of the CLARITY Act has sparked significant discussion around its stablecoin provisions. Industry experts warn that decentralized finance tokens may bear the brunt of the legislation’s consequences.

Under the proposed framework, stablecoins would be prohibited from providing yields or any similar incentive structures, including balance-based rewards. This restriction would fundamentally transform stablecoins into payment instruments rather than blockchain-based savings vehicles.

Advertisement

Markus Thielen, who established 10x Research, indicated that the legislation would effectively channel yield opportunities back into conventional financial systems. Traditional banks, money market vehicles, and compliant financial products would capture these benefits, while cryptocurrency-native services would lose competitive advantage in offering returns.

Initial speculation suggested that DeFi platforms might actually attract more users if centralized crypto services were prevented from distributing yields. The theory presumed capital would migrate toward onchain alternatives.

However, Thielen challenged this assumption. He explained that the CLARITY regulatory structure would probably apply to user-facing platforms and token economics, especially when fee structures or governance mechanisms begin resembling equity instruments.

Potential Impact on DeFi Platforms

This regulatory approach places numerous DeFi initiatives under scrutiny. Decentralized trading venues and lending services may encounter fresh restrictions governing their operations and value distribution mechanisms.

Advertisement

Platforms such as Uniswap, Sushi, and dYdX face potential consequences, alongside lending services like Aave and Compound. Enhanced regulatory oversight might trigger diminished trading activity, thinner liquidity pools, and decreased token valuations, the 10x Research analysis suggests.

The fundamental question centers on whether these platforms can maintain fee distribution or incentive programs for token holders without triggering new stablecoin-focused regulations.

Thielen observed that distinguishing between governance tokens and regulated financial instruments grows increasingly complex within this regulatory framework.

Circle Positioned for Potential Gains

The legislation wouldn’t create obstacles for every cryptocurrency entity. Circle, which issues the USDC stablecoin, might emerge as a beneficiary under the proposed rules.

Advertisement

Thielen characterized the regulation as fundamentally favorable for infrastructure providers like Circle. Should stablecoins become embedded within payment networks, issuers maintaining robust regulatory compliance would secure advantageous positions.

The CLARITY Act continues advancing through the legislative pipeline. Congress has not yet enacted a final version.

While stablecoin provisions dominate policy discussions in Washington, industry analysts emphasize that the ripple effects across DeFi ecosystems deserve equal attention.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

White House App Sparks Privacy Fears Over Tracking and Data Collection

Published

on

Business, Technology, Privacy, Adoption, White House, Applications

A new app from the US government has sparked concerns among users and researchers over potential location-tracking features, security vulnerabilities and data collection.

The White House launched the app on Friday as a way for users to get a “direct line to the White House,” including receiving breaking news alerts on major government announcements, watching livestreams and keeping up to date on “policy breakthroughs.”

However, users on X have raised concerns about the permissions required to use the app, including access to the device’s location, shared storage and network activity, though these claims have not been independently verified.

While many apps often request location permissions and can log user data, an app launched by the federal government requesting this information can invite additional concerns. 

Advertisement

However, both listings on the Google Play Store and Apple’s App Store currently do not display these warnings.

A White House app privacy policy said it automatically stores information about the originating Internet Protocol (IP) address and other basic information, while it can retain names and email addresses of subscribers, though these are not required to use the app.

Business, Technology, Privacy, Adoption, White House, Applications
Source: Tyler Oakley

Cointelegraph has contacted the White House for comment.

Security engineer says GPS tracking is part of the app

On the app’s Google Play Store page, it states that personal data, including phone numbers and email addresses, may be collected through download and use. Apple’s App Store, meanwhile, directs users to the White House’s privacy policy.

A software developer using the X handle Thereallo, along with Adam, a security engineer and infrastructure architect, say they have identified code suggesting the app could access a device’s GPS for tracking.

Advertisement

While the feature is common across a number of apps, Adam said it is unusual for location-tracking services to be in software that does not appear to need them.

“There is no map, no local news, no geofencing, no events near you, no weather. Nothing in the app that requires location,” he added.

Concerns of GPS tracking every 4.5 minutes

Thereallo made a similar claim that the app includes code that could enable tracking a device every 4.5 minutes in the foreground and 9.5 minutes in the background, though this has not been independently verified.

Business, Technology, Privacy, Adoption, White House, Applications
Source: Thereallo

They found that it still requires permission but warned that it is only “one call away from activating,” and that the tracking “infrastructure is there, ready to go.”

Related: Trump advisory council draws Coinbase co-founder, tech leaders

Advertisement

At the same time, Thereallo said the app is collecting other data such as notification interactions, in-app message clicks and phone number.

Security could be broken, researcher says

Adam said the app’s security may also be weak enough for a technically skilled person to intercept its data or alter its functionality

“Anyone on the same Wi-Fi network, say, at a coffee shop, an airport, or a congressional hearing room, can intercept API traffic with a proxy. Anyone with a jailbroken device can hook and modify the app’s behavior at runtime,” he said.

“No servers were probed. No network traffic was intercepted. No DRM was bypassed. No tools were used that require jailbreaking. Everything described here is observable by anyone who downloads the app from the App Store and has a terminal.”

Magazine: Morgan Stanley Bitcoin ETF undercuts BlackRock, SBF pardon unlikely: Hodler’s Digest, Mar. 22 – 28

Advertisement