Crypto World
Crypto, Banks Stand Off as Senate Bill Sparks New Proposal Concerns
A high-stakes negotiation over stablecoin yields is shaping the path forward for the Senate’s crypto market structure bill, with lawmakers racing to clear a stalemate that has stretched since the House passed the CLARITY Act in July. Senator Thom Tillis signaled he would release a draft agreement this week aimed at resolving a central dispute: whether third parties, including crypto exchanges, should be allowed to pay stablecoin yields to users. The draft’s reception by both banks and the crypto industry will likely determine whether a broader compromise can finally move the legislation toward floor consideration.
The draft has already been circulated to banking and crypto representatives, according to people familiar with the matter cited by Politico. Initial reactions included pushback from the banking side, which worries that full text is needed to gauge the practical consequences of any yield-related prohibitions. Tillis acknowledged that the document is still evolving and stressed that the group is negotiating against a backdrop of concerns about deposit flight tied to yield programs. “Directionally, it has been instructed by what we consider to be the legitimate issues that we have around deposit flight when we’re talking about yield,” Tillis told Politico.
Key takeaways
- Sen. Thom Tillis intends to publicly release a draft agreement this week that addresses the Senate’s crypto market structure bill and a contentious ban on third-party stablecoin yield payments.
- Banking and crypto groups have expressed concerns about the proposed language, and a full text release is seen as essential for meaningful negotiations.
- The talks have been mediated by the White House, with at least three meetings held to bridge gaps between the sectors.
- Stablecoin yields remain a practical and revenue-critical component for many crypto platforms, complicating policy choices about how yield payments should be treated under banking and securities laws.
- If consensus remains elusive, Tillis says another round of negotiations could occur, potentially marking the fourth government-led mediation effort on the issue.
Draft could unlock a long-standing impasse on yields
The Senate’s crypto market structure bill is designed to outline how the nation’s primary financial regulators—namely the two major federal watchdogs—would oversee the crypto sector. Its chances of advancement depend in part on resolving a central dispute: whether third parties, including exchanges, may offer yield payments on stablecoins or whether such activity should be curtailed or banned altogether. The prospect of a prohibition has been a sticking point since early conversations intensified earlier in the year.
Advocates for a broader, clearer regulatory framework argue that stablecoins — and the incentives around their yields — intersect with traditional banking and savings behavior in ways that could affect deposit stability and consumer protection. Banks and financial incumbents fear yield programs could intensify deposit flight, potentially destabilizing bank balance sheets and prompting risk management concerns. In contrast, crypto industry participants have pushed for clearer guardrails that would allow legitimate yield activities to continue under a predictable regulatory regime, rather than a blanket restriction that could push operations overseas or into a more uncertain gray area.
Tillis’s comments underscore a willingness to adjust the draft as negotiations proceed. He noted progress on anti-evasion provisions but indicated that enforcement language remains a work in progress. With the White House having hosted multiple meetings between the groups, the process has been shaped not only by lawmakers but by executive-branch engagement intended to surface workable compromises rather than political theatrics. The goal, as described by Tillis, is to land on a “mark” — a final set of provisions that both sides can accept and that lawmakers can advance to a vote.
Industry tensions: what’s in play and why it matters
Stablecoin yields are a practical business line for crypto platforms, representing a channel through which users earn returns on their digital dollars. Banks view such yield payments through the lens of traditional financial stability and supervision, arguing that third-party yield offerings can complicate customer behavior around savings, liquidity, and the movement of deposits. The core concern is depositor discipline and the potential for destabilizing flows that could spill over into the broader regulated banking system.
Crypto industry participants counter that clear, enforceable rules are preferable to opaque or ad hoc prohibitions. They argue that a well-defined framework could bring stablecoins and their yield mechanisms under accountability without forcing projects to relocate out of the United States or shutter legitimate financial services. The ongoing dialogue, including White House mediation, reflects a broader policy question: how to balance rapid financial innovation with prudent oversight. The outcome could influence how exchanges and other service providers structure stablecoin programs for the foreseeable future.
The evolving draft has already drawn scrutiny from observers who remind markets that the bill’s trajectory could affect more than the yield debate. A stable regulatory environment that clarifies which actors can provide yield and under what conditions can reduce uncertainty for issuers, users, and institutional participants. Conversely, a restrictive stance may curb experimentation and push some yield initiatives underground, creating potential compliance challenges.
Next steps: where the process goes from here
With Tillis indicating openness to further changes, the immediate question is whether the forthcoming draft will present a sufficiently narrow and precise set of rules to garner bipartisan support. If banking and crypto groups still diverge after a full text becomes public, Tillis said he would consider convening another negotiation session that could bring in additional participants or proposals. He described the process as potentially continuing through a fourth round of government-facilitated talks if needed to finish the “final pieces” and reach a mark that lawmakers can advance.
The momentum depends on how convincingly the draft reconciles two core concerns: protecting the stability of the banking system and enabling legitimate, compliant crypto yield offerings. The White House-mediated meetings signal a heightened emphasis on achieving a balanced outcome that can withstand political scrutiny while delivering a practical regulatory framework for markets. Investors, traders, and builders in the crypto space will be watching closely for the exact language on enforcement, anti-evasion measures, and the precise scope of any ban on third-party yield payments.
Broader implications for policy, markets, and adoption
Beyond the immediate legislative maneuvering, the outcome of the yield provisions could shape the tempo of stablecoin adoption and the maturation of the crypto economy in the United States. A well-structured agreement that provides clarity without stifling innovation could reassure issuers and users that stablecoins will operate under predictable rules. It could also influence how exchanges, custodians, and on/off-ramp providers design their product offerings to align with future compliance expectations. For policymakers, the challenge remains to strike a balance between consumer protection, financial stability, and the competitive advantage that clear rules can offer to domestic innovators.
As the draft is unveiled and debated in the weeks ahead, market participants should monitor not only the yield provisions themselves but also the broader framework for how the bill would allocate regulatory authority between the nation’s principal watchdogs. The ultimate shape of the text will influence not just the economics of stablecoins but the regulatory posture that defines the U.S. stance toward crypto markets in the coming years.
Thus, the key questions for readers and market participants are straightforward: Will the forthcoming draft provide a credible path to de-risk yield programs while preserving financial stability? How decisive will the enforcement language be, and what guardrails will govern anti-evasion measures? And finally, when can market participants expect a final mark that the Senate can move through committee and toward a vote?
Keep watching regulatory filings and official statements for the full draft text and any subsequent revisions. The next few weeks are likely to define whether the United States can strike a middle ground that both protects consumers and supports responsible financial innovation in stablecoins.
Morpho is the second-largest lending protocol in DeFi, with $7.7B in TVL.
Morpho, DeFi’s second-largest lending protocol by value locked, has officially named its long-in-development fixed-rate product: Morpho Midnight.
Co-founder and CEO Paul Frambot announced the name on X today, April 14, emphasizing that Midnight is not a sequel to Morpho Blue. “It is a completely new paradigm for onchain lending, and should not be considered a ‘V2’ of Blue,” Frambot wrote.
The distinction is structural, according to Frambot’s X post. Morpho Blue offers pool-based, open-term variable-rate markets with externalized risk management. Midnight introduces intent-based, fixed-term, fixed-rate markets with externalized management of both risk as well as rate, a different mechanism for pricing and matching lenders and borrowers.
The two protocols will coexist and complement each other within the broader Morpho network, per the X post. Frambot first flagged the naming overhaul of Morpho’s fixed rate market in early March, when he dropped versioning terminology (Markets V1/V2) in favor of distinct brand identities for each product.
Frambot added in today’s announcement that more details on Midnight are expected as security audits finalize.
Morpho currently holds approximately $7.7 billion in total value locked, per data from DefiLlama, making it the second-largest lending protocol in DeFi, following Aave with $26.3 billion in TVL.
Last June, The Defiant reported on Morpho’s V2 launch, which introduced fixed-rate and fixed-term loans, with the aim to bring DeFi lending closer to traditional finance structures, which Midnight now builds on.
Last month, the Ethereum Foundation made its second deployment into Morpho Vaults, bringing its total commitment to nearly $19 million and citing the protocol’s immutable, open-source architecture as a model for cypherpunk-aligned DeFi infrastructure.
This article was written with the assistance of AI workflows. All our stories are curated, edited and fact-checked by a human.
The Ethereum price jumped 8 percent to $2,370 Tuesday morning as Trump’s signals about potential Iran peace talks triggered a broad risk-on rally across crypto markets, with bitcoin touching $74,900 and the total crypto market cap approaching $2.6 trillion.
Summary
- Bloomberg data confirmed Ether rose 5 percent alongside bitcoin’s move to $74,400, with the synchronized gains across BTC, ETH, and XRP signaling genuine risk appetite returning to the asset class rather than a bitcoin-only safe-haven move.
- Ethereum is trading approximately 52 percent below its August 2025 all-time high of $4,953 and has faced sustained ETF outflows, with Ethereum investment products recording $129 million in net outflows on April 11 even as XRP pulled in $119.6 million.
- Standard Chartered maintains a long-term $15,000 price target for Ethereum, while Arthur Hayes has projected a $10,000 to $20,000 range, though both scenarios depend on macro conditions and regulatory clarity that the current Iran war environment has substantially delayed.
Yahoo Finance data shows Ethereum opened Monday at $2,191 and fell 4.1 percent from Sunday’s open as the naval blockade went live. Tuesday’s 8 percent reversal at the open demonstrates how directly Iran war headlines are driving Ether’s price action in the absence of a crypto-specific catalyst. The CLARITY Act markup window opening this week is the first regulatory catalyst Ethereum has had since the ceasefire rally, and passage of the bill would formalize Ethereum’s digital commodity classification under federal law for the first time.
When bitcoin rallies alone, it typically reflects either a bitcoin-specific catalyst or safe-haven rotation within crypto. When Ethereum rises 8 percent on the same day, it reflects a broader improvement in risk appetite across the asset class. Tuesday’s move included XRP gains, altcoin recovery, and total market cap approaching $2.6 trillion, meaning the Iran peace signal triggered a system-wide repricing rather than a single-asset move. That distinction matters because system-wide rallies have historically been more durable than single-asset moves driven by short squeezes.
What the ETF Outflow Divergence Means
XRP pulled in $119.6 million in weekly ETF inflows while Ethereum recorded $129 million in outflows on a single day. That divergence is striking and reflects different institutional narratives. XRP is being accumulated ahead of expected CLARITY Act clarity that would cement its digital commodity status. Ethereum’s ETF flows reflect institutional uncertainty about its regulatory classification and concerns about its economic model relative to bitcoin. The Ethereum Foundation completed a $143 million staking commitment in the same week as the ETF outflows, showing that on-chain conviction and product flows are telling different stories.
What Ethereum Needs to Sustain This Move
The price needs three inputs to sustain above $2,370: a credible Iran diplomatic development before April 22, a CLARITY Act markup announcement from the Senate Banking Committee, and continued bitcoin strength above $74,000. Without all three, the most likely outcome is a fade back toward the $2,150 to $2,200 range where Ethereum has consolidated for most of the Iran war period.
Crypto World
Bitcoin’s ‘your keys, your coins’ promise just got an expiry date from a new developer proposal
Bitcoin was built on a promise that no one can touch your coins without your private key. No government, no bank, nobody.
That promise is now, for the first time in Bitcoin’s 16-year history, being challenged from the developer community itself, as a part of measures to build defenses against future quantum computers that could compromise Bitcoin’s blockchain and steal your coins.
The proposal
Jameson Loop, one of the outspoken bitcoin contributors, and other cryptographers, have proposed a move that could force bitcoin holders to migrate their coins to new quantum-resistant addresses or face having their coins frozen permanently by the network itself. In that scenario, holders would technically still “own” the coins, but lose the ability to move them.
It is called Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP)-361 and was updated in Bitcoin’s official proposal repository Tuesday with the title “Post Quantum Migration and Legacy Signature Sunset.”
This comes as a recently released Google report warned that a sufficiently powerful quantum machine could require significantly less firepower to compromise the Bitcoin blockchain than initially estimated. This prompted some observers to cite 2029 as the quantum deadline for bitcoin.
To understand the need to freeze coins, you need to know what it is protecting against.
Every Bitcoin wallet is secured by a form of cryptography called ECDSA, or Elliptic Curve Digital Signature algorithm. Think of it as a lock on your wallet. When you set up a wallet, two keys are generated: Private key, which is a unique password used to prove that you own the coins you are spending. Then there is a public key derived from the private key. This public key helps receive funds, verify transaction signatures, and ensure security without revealing the owner’s private key.
Here is the problem: your public key is revealed on the blockchain, permanently for anyone to see when you send funds. A sufficiently powerful quantum machine can use it to reverse engineer your private key and drain your funds.
As of March, the sum of all BTC in vulnerable addresses was approximately 6.7 million BTC, according to the Google study.
BIP-361 builds on the proposal put forward in February under BIP-360, which introduced a soft fork—a network upgrade—designed to enable a new transaction type called pay-to-Merkle-root (P2MR). The approach borrows from Bitcoin’s Taproot (P2TR) framework, but strips out the key-based spending path, removing an element widely viewed as exposed to potential quantum-era risks.
Three phases
The BIP 361 proposal structures the migration in three phases. The Phase A kicks in three years after potential activation, blocking anyone from sending new bitcoin to old-style, quantum-vulnerable addresses. You can still spend from these addresses, but cannot receive anything.
The Phase B, to kick in five years after activation, will render old style signatures (ECDSA and Schnorr) completely invalid such that attempts to spend from quantum-vulnerable wallets will be rejected by the network. In essence, your coins will be frozen.
Finally, Phase C, is a proposed rescue, still under research, where holder with frozen wallets could potentially prove ownership using a zero-knowledge proof, a way of proving the knowledge of a secret without revealing the secret itself. If it works, coins frozen by Phase B could be recovered.
Community backlash
The idea of freezing coins as a defense against quantum threats cuts directly against one of Bitcoin’s most fundamental promises: sovereign, permissionless control over funds.
At its core, Bitcoin is designed to ensure that whoever holds the private keys controls the coins – without exception. Introducing a mechanism that allows coins to be frozen, even under extraordinary circumstances like a quantum attack, implies that this principle can be overridden.
The community, therefore, is not happy with the proposal.
“This quantum proposal is highly authoritarian and confiscatory, but of course, it’s from Lopp. There is no good rationale for forcing the upgrade and rendering old spends invalid. Upgrade should be 100% voluntary,” one X user said.
“This reeks of central planning with the deadlines, behavior coercion, and forced migration,” another user said.
Developers, however, called it a defensive measure.
“This is not an offensive attack, rather, it is defensive: our thesis is that the Bitcoin ecosystem wishes to defend itself and its interests against those who would prefer to do nothing and allow a malicious actor to destroy both value and trust,” they said.
Tether, the company behind the world’s largest stablecoin, USDt (USDT), has launched a self-custodial wallet called tether.wallet.
Tether.wallet supports three Tether-issued assets: USDT, XAUt (XAUT) and the US-focused USAT (USAT), as well as Bitcoin (BTC), the company announced Tuesday.
Tether said the wallet allows users to transact without requiring them to hold separate network or gas tokens, with fees paid directly in the asset being transferred.
The wallet also uses human-readable @tether.me usernames, aimed at eliminating the need to interact with long wallet addresses. With some commentators highlighting the potentially “centralized” nature of such identifiers, it remains unclear whether they introduce any friction in terms of self-custody or security.
The launch marks Tether’s clearest push yet into direct consumer wallet distribution, packaging stablecoin and Bitcoin payments in a simpler interface while testing how much convenience users will accept inside a product marketed as self-custodial. The wallet builds on the work the company began when it launched its open-source Wallet Development Kit in late 2024. The WDK was designed to enable developers to integrate non-custodial wallets for USDT and BTC into any app, website or device.
Cointelegraph reached out to Tether for comment but had not received a response by publication.
The app is fully self-custodial by design, Tether says
The wallet is immediately available for download on mobile devices, with the website inviting users to install iOS or Android versions at launch.
“The application is fully self-custodial by design,” Tether said in the announcement, noting that all transactions are signed locally on the user’s device before being broadcast to the network.
“Private keys and recovery phrases are always in sole control of the user,” the company said, adding that the wallet’s self-custodial design aligns with Tether’s core principle of making financial systems “open, neutral, accessible, and in control of the user.”
“With more than 570 million people already using Tether’s technology, the next step is making that digital infrastructure more accessible and usable for end users,” Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino said, adding that the objective is to remove wallet complexities that have prevented broader adoption.
Related: Tether may delay fundraising if demand falls short at $500B valuation: Report
Private keys “safely backed to cloud”
At launch, the wallet supports USDT and XAUT on Ethereum, Polygon, Plasma and Arbitrum, while USAT is initially available exclusively on Ethereum. Bitcoin is supported both onchain and via the Lightning Network.
According to an X post by tether.wallet, the newly launched wallet allows users to control their private keys and “safely back up” to the cloud.
It’s unclear whether users can disable cloud-based private key backups. Cointelegraph will update the article pending Tether’s response.
Some users have opposed similar cloud-based key recovery solutions in the past, including on hardware wallets such as Ledger.
Magazine: Nobody knows if quantum secure cryptography will even work
ETH derivatives open interest jumps 11.59% in 24 hours to $34.165B, with Binance, Gate, Bybit and OKX carrying most of the leverage as traders pile into Ethereum.
Summary
- ETH total derivatives open interest jumps 11.59% in 24 hours to $34.165 billion.
- Binance leads with $7.416 billion in ETH OI, followed by Gate, Bybit and OKX.
- Surge echoes March’s leveraged build‑up that pushed ETH OI above $30 billion.
Ethereum’s derivatives market has lit up again, with total ETH contract open interest jumping 11.59% in the past 24 hours to $34.165 billion as traders add fresh leverage across major venues.
According to Coinglass data, Binance accounts for roughly $7.416 billion of that exposure, while OKX holds $1.943 billion, Bybit $2.331 billion and Gate $4.36 billion, underscoring how concentrated ETH risk remains on a handful of centralized exchanges.
The move comes as ETH trades above $2,300, extending a derivatives‑driven upswing that previously saw open interest climb about 9% in a day to more than $30 billion in March, as detailed in a crypto.news story on Ethereum’s earlier leverage spike.
Derivatives tracker Coinglass, which aggregates futures and perpetual positions across venues, shows ETH open interest rising from around $30.6 billion to $34.165 billion over 24 hours, indicating a sharp increase in capital betting on Ethereum’s next leg.
In March, open interest swelled by nearly 9% in a day to roughly $30.4 billion as ETH climbed above $2,180, with Binance, Gate, Bybit and OKX holding most of the risk and raising “spillover” concerns if one venue suffered a squeeze or outage, according to a previous crypto.news story.
More recently, Ethereum derivatives open interest has also shown its capacity to move in reverse, dropping 5.62% in one 24‑hour window to $27.119 billion during a leverage flush that forced traders to close or liquidate positions, as covered in another crypto.news story on ETH risk reduction.
The latest 11.59% jump suggests traders are once again crowding into ETH futures, a pattern that can amplify both rallies and drawdowns when funding turns or liquidations cascade through the order books.
At the same time, exchange‑level data shows Binance, OKX, Bybit and Gate continuing to dominate crypto derivatives, with Binance and OKX controlling a combined 53.3% of global derivatives market share and Gate ranking third by open interest at $8.68 billion across assets, according to recent derivatives statistics.
As Ethereum’s leverage build‑up accelerates, traders watching ETH’s spot price on the Ethereum market‑cap page, as well as Bitcoin and other majors on their respective price pages, will be gauging whether the derivatives market is setting up a sustainable grind higher or yet another sharp liquidations event.
The SEC on April 14 approved FINRA’s proposal to eliminate the $25,000 minimum equity requirement for pattern day traders. This removed one of the most persistent barriers to retail market participation.
The decision also removes the “pattern day trader” designation, a classification that flagged any customer who executed four or more day trades within five business days.
What the New Rules Replace
The original Pattern Day Trader (PDT) rule dates back to 2001. Regulators introduced the $25,000 threshold in response to heavy retail losses during the dot-com crash. For over two decades, it effectively prevented smaller accounts from participating in active intraday trading.
“Since 2001, if you wanted to make more than 3 day trades in a 5 day period, you needed at least $25,000 sitting in your account at all times. If you dropped below that, your broker would lock you out of day trading completely. This rule blocked millions of retail traders from actively participating in markets simply because they did not have enough capital,” Bull Theory wrote.
Under the approved changes to FINRA Rule 4210, traders will instead need to maintain equity proportional to their actual market exposure at any given point during the trading day. Customers of FINRA member broker-dealers remain subject to existing initial and regular maintenance margin requirements under Rule 4210.
Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens
The framework also fills a gap in the previous rules by covering zero-days-to-expiration (0DTE) options. Broker-dealers get two paths for implementation. Firms can deploy real-time monitoring systems that block trades before they breach margin limits, or they can run a single end-of-day calculation to assess intraday exposure.
Accounts that repeatedly fail to meet intraday margin deficits within five business days will face a 90-day freeze on creating or increasing short positions or debit balances. Small deficits under the lesser of 5% of account equity or $1,000, and those occurring under extraordinary circumstances, are exempted from triggering the freeze.
“FINRA believes that the proposed rule change will benefit customers and members alike by reducing risks of intraday trading exposures more broadly and giving customers more freedom to participate in the markets, while reducing compliance costs for members,” the notice read.
The new rules take effect 45 days after FINRA publishes its Regulatory Notice. Firms that need additional time to upgrade their systems will have an 18-month phase-in period from the date of the Regulatory Notice.
Subscribe to our YouTube channel to watch leaders and journalists provide expert insights
The post SEC Eliminates $25,000 Pattern Day Trader Rule in Retail Trading Overhaul appeared first on BeInCrypto.
The Goldman Sachs Bitcoin Premium Income ETF primarily will offer exposure to other Bitcoin exchange-traded products, but the fund won’t hold BTC directly.
Goldman Sachs has filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the Goldman Sachs Bitcoin Premium Income ETF, marking the Wall Street giant’s first foray into issuing its own crypto fund.
The preliminary prospectus, filed with the SEC today April 14, states that the fund will invest at least 80% of net assets in BTC-exposed instruments, primarily shares of existing spot Bitcoin exchange-traded products, while layering an options strategy on top to generate income.
The “premium” in the name refers to cash collected by selling call options on those spot Bitcoin ETFs. Per the filing, Goldman plans to sell call options covering between 40% and 100% of the fund’s Bitcoin exposure, collecting upfront fees, aka premiums, from buyers.
The move is a notable shift for Goldman, which has spent the past two years buying other firms’ Bitcoin ETFs rather than launching its own. According to Fortune, the bank held about $2.05 billion in Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs as of end of 2024, with its largest positions in BlackRock’s and Fidelity’s funds — a stake it has continued to build.
The filing comes on the heels of Morgan Stanley’s spot Bitcoin ETF debut, which launched with $30 million in inflows on its first day. If approved, it would mark another major Wall Street bank bringing a crypto-linked fund to market.
A ticker and exchange listing have not yet been finalized, per the SEC filing.
Bitcoin is up 4% on the day, trading near $74,800, per data from The Defiant’s price tracker.
This article was written with the assistance of AI workflows. All our stories are curated, edited and fact-checked by a human.
The stablecoin news out of JPMorgan’s Q1 2026 earnings call Tuesday landed directly in the middle of the CLARITY Act negotiations when CFO Jeremy Barnum warned that yield-bearing stablecoins risk becoming a tool for regulatory arbitrage unless they are held to the same strict oversight and consumer protection standards as traditional bank deposits.
Summary
- Barnum said stablecoins that offer interest-bearing rewards are creating what he described as a “parallel banking system” that replicates the features of traditional deposits without the prudential safeguards developed over centuries of bank regulation.
- The CFO’s remarks land as Senate negotiators are working toward a compromise on stablecoin yield rules in the CLARITY Act, with the Tillis-Alsobrooks framework banning passive yield while permitting activity-based rewards tied to payments and platform use.
- JPMorgan has invested in blockchain technology and launched its own tokenized deposit product, JPMD, meaning Barnum’s criticism is coming from a position of direct competitive interest in how stablecoin yield is regulated.
Fast Company reported in March that JPMorgan has previously warned stablecoins paying interest could put up to $6.6 trillion in bank deposits at risk, a figure Treasury has also cited in its own analysis. Barnum on Tuesday framed the same concern in regulatory terms, calling the gap between what stablecoins offer consumers and what regulations currently require of them the core problem. “How does this actually make the consumer experience better?” he said, arguing that the answer needs to involve equivalent safeguards rather than just technological novelty. His comments add institutional banking weight to the argument that the CLARITY Act’s stablecoin yield provisions, which banks have successfully lobbied to tighten, are necessary rather than anti-competitive.
Barnum’s use of the term “regulatory arbitrage” is precise. When a crypto platform pays 5 percent yield on a stablecoin holding and a bank pays 4.5 percent on a savings account, the difference is not innovation, it is the absence of the capital requirements, deposit insurance, anti-money laundering compliance, and liquidity obligations that the bank must maintain. Consumers see equivalent products. They are not equivalent risks. That gap is what Barnum is calling arbitrage: earning competitive returns on a product that bypasses the costs of the regulatory framework that makes traditional deposits safe.
Why This Matters for the CLARITY Act This Week
The CLARITY Act’s stablecoin yield provision was the central dispute that stalled the bill since January. Coinbase pulled support twice over language that would eliminate its $800 million in estimated annual stablecoin revenue. Banks, led publicly by JPMorgan, have consistently argued that any form of yield on stablecoins requires bank-level oversight. Barnum’s Tuesday remarks reinforce the banking industry’s legislative position at exactly the moment the Senate Banking Committee is deciding whether to schedule a markup. They are a signal that the compromise on yield language needs to close the arbitrage gap rather than just split it.
What the Crypto Industry Says in Response
Coinbase and other crypto firms have argued that the White House’s own CEA report proves the banking industry’s deposit flight fears are overstated, with a full yield ban boosting bank lending by just 0.02 percent. The debate ultimately comes down to whether stablecoin yield is a consumer benefit that regulators should protect or a regulatory gap that they should close. As the markup window opens this week, Barnum’s framing gives Senate Banking Committee members an institutional banking perspective to weigh against the crypto industry’s consumer benefit argument.
Crypto markets staged a broad Tuesday rally, fueled by over $500M in short liquidations.
Bitcoin pushed to its highest level in a month on Tuesday as risk appetite returned to crypto markets after President Trump signaled his openness to renewed talks with Tehran even as the U.S. blockade of the Strait of Hormuz remains in place.
The largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization is trading at $75,420, up 5% over the past 24 hours and 10.5% on the week. Ethereum (ETH) is the standout among majors, gaining more than 7% to $2,360, up 14% on the week.
Total crypto market capitalization rose to $2.63 trillion, with Bitcoin dominance hovering near 60%.
Shorts Routed
Data from CoinGlass shows that more than $525 million of leveraged short positions were liquidated in the past 24 hours, and roughly $200 million more would be liquidated if BTC pushes above $75,500, a dynamic that could add fuel to the rally.
Bitcoin accounted for $282 million in total liquidations, and Ether followed at $187 million.
Macro Backdrop
The S&P 500 has now erased all losses triggered by the Iran conflict. Brent crude fell below $100 as markets priced in the possibility of fresh talks before the April 7 ceasefire expires next week.
Markets continue to price in a near-certainty that the Federal Reserve will hold rates steady at its April 28-29 meeting. The Fed Funds rate sits at 3.5% to 3.75%, with one quarter-point cut penciled in for 2026.
Altcoin Movers
Solana’s SOL climbed 4% to $86, up 9.3% for the week. BNB gained 3.3% to $625, XRP rose 3.6% to $1.38, and Dogecoin added 5%. Every non-stable asset in the top 10 is green on both the daily and weekly timeframes.
Meanwhile, Bittensor (TAO) is today’s only loser in the Top 100 as it continues to grapple with the exit of one of its most prominent subnet projects.
A closely watched gauge of ether’s relative strength against bitcoin has climbed to a three month high, backed by surging network activity and record stablecoin inflows on Ethereum.
The ether-bitcoin ratio traded near 0.0313 on Wednesday, up from a 2026 low around 0.028 in February but still well below the January 18 high near 0.038. Ether gained 4% over the past seven days to trade near $2,325, outpacing bitcoin’s 3.9% move over the same period.
The ETH/BTC ratio tracks the relative price of ether against bitcoin on crypto exchanges and is one of the most widely followed gauges of risk appetite across the digital asset market.
A rising ratio signals that capital is flowing into ether and, by extension, riskier parts of the crypto ecosystem. A falling ratio points to a preference for bitcoin’s relative safety.
The pair peaked above 0.08 in late 2021 before entering a prolonged decline that accelerated through 2024 and into 2025, dragged lower by bitcoin ETF-driven demand, weakened fee revenue on Ethereum’s base layer following the Dencun upgrade, and a broader rotation away from altcoins.
When ether outperforms bitcoin on risk-on days rather than simply tagging along, it historically suggests capital is beginning to rotate rather than chase the same trade. The signal strengthens if ether holds up better than bitcoin during the next pullback.
Part of the case for a sustained move rests on Ethereum’s on-chain fundamentals, which have been diverging from the token’s depressed valuation.
New users on the network surged 82% quarter-over-quarter in Q1 to 284,000, according to data from Artemis, while total transactions hit a record 200.4 million for the quarter, a 43% increase from the prior period.
Stablecoin supply on Ethereum also reached an all-time high of $180 billion, up 150% over the past three years, per Token Terminal. The network holds roughly 60% of the global stablecoin market, reinforcing its dominance as the primary settlement layer for tokenized dollars and suggesting a long-term demand anchor for ETH even as short-term price action lags.
However, ether is still more than 50% below its 52-week high of $4,831, and the ratio would need to reclaim the 0.035 zone on a weekly close to provide evidence that the recovery has legs beyond a short-squeeze bounce.
Morpho Unveils Fixed-Rate Protocol Morpho Midnight
Inside Lena Dunham and Adam Driver’s Complicated Relationship
Baby found with drugs in system was ‘unkempt and unclean’ before tragic death
-
Politics4 days agoUS brings back mandatory military draft registration
-
Sports5 days agoMan United discover Nico Schlotterbeck transfer fee as defender reaches Dortmund agreement
-
Fashion5 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Veronica Beard
-
Politics5 days agoMalcolm In The Middle OG Turned Down ‘Buckets Of Money’ To Appear In Reboot
-
Politics3 days agoWorld Cup exit makes Italy enter crisis mode
-
Crypto World6 days agoCanary Capital Files SEC Registration for PEPE ETF
-
Business4 days agoTesla Model Y Tops China Auto Sales in March 2026 With 39,827 Registrations, Beating Cheaper EVs and Gas Cars
-
Crypto World1 day agoThe SEC Conditionalises DeFi Platforms to Be Avoided for Broker Registration
-
Crypto World1 day agoSEC Signals Exemption for Crypto Interfaces From Broker Registration
-
Crypto World7 days agoBitcoin recovers as US and Iran Agree a Ceasefire Deal
-
NewsBeat2 days agoPep Guardiola and Gary Neville agree over Arsenal title problem that benefits Man City
-
Business5 days agoOpenAI Halts Stargate UK Data Centre Project Over Energy Costs and Copyright Row
-
Business4 days agoIreland Fuel Protests Enter Day 5 as Blockades Spark Shortages and Government Prepares Support Package
-
Politics5 days agoLBC Presenter Mocks Trump Over Iran War Failures
-
Crypto World4 days agoFederal judge blocks Arizona from bringing criminal charges against Kalshi
-
NewsBeat3 days agoJD Vance announces ‘no agreement’ with Iran over nuclear weapons fear
-
Tech5 days agoA version of Windows 10 released a decade ago is now eligible for additional security patches
-
Crypto World1 day agoSEC Proposes Certain Crypto Interfaces Don’t Need to Register as Brokers
-
Business4 days agoIMF retains floor for precautionary balances at SDR 20 billion
-
NewsBeat21 hours agoTrump and Pope Leo: Behind their disagreement over Iran war
You must be logged in to post a comment Login