Global uncertainty and AI disruption are forcing investors and operators to shift from growth at all costs to resilience and optionality.

Investors are exhibiting what market participants characterize as hesitation rather than panic. Stock markets remain near historic highs, yet conviction levels are reported as low. Cryptocurrency has achieved institutional acceptance but sentiment around its transformative potential has diminished, according to market observers.

Gold and silver are experiencing sharp price movements, leading to increased trading activity. Real estate performance varies significantly by region, with currency risk and financing costs creating additional complexity. Manufacturing investments face uncertainty due to geopolitical considerations, where policy changes or conflicts can rapidly alter business conditions.

Capital is rotating across asset classes as investors search for opportunities in an environment where traditional investment frameworks appear less reliable, according to financial analysts.

Artificial intelligence is reducing the cost of building digital products and services, shifting where value creation occurs in the economy. As software development and content generation become more accessible, differentiation increasingly depends on access, distribution, and trust rather than building capability alone, industry analysts said.

The technology is enabling more individuals to launch businesses, increasing supply across multiple sectors. Questions are emerging about whether demand growth will match the expansion in supply, particularly as economic pressures affect consumer spending patterns.

Physical infrastructure and essential services are receiving renewed attention as areas that remain difficult to replicate and slow to disrupt, according to investment strategists.

Traditional business models are facing new scrutiny as operators reassess risk-return profiles. Businesses requiring significant operational effort over extended periods are being compared against returns available from passive capital deployment.

Strategic justifications for operating businesses are increasingly focused on ecosystem effects, long-term positioning, and connected opportunities that create optionality over time, rather than linear returns alone, according to business strategists.

Investment and business development questions are shifting from growth optimization to resilience under adverse conditions, according to market participants. Geographic flexibility, exposure to essential demand, and diversification across multiple systems are receiving increased emphasis in strategic planning.

The current period is characterized as a transition between economic frameworks, with established narratives around globalization, stable growth, and predictable cycles no longer fully explaining market dynamics, according to economic analysts.

Risk is being repriced across multiple systems simultaneously, creating an environment where early adaptation to changing conditions may provide competitive advantages, market observers said.

The transition is expected to favor positions tied to unavoidable demand, including local markets, physical infrastructure, distribution networks, and essential services, according to investment strategists. Technology continues to play a central role but is increasingly viewed as making other sectors more efficient rather than as a standalone source of value creation.

The numbers keep getting cited at crypto conferences, but at Consensus Hong Kong 2026, they came from a different kind of speaker — not a protocol founder or exchange CEO, but a BlackRock executive doing math on a stage.

The conference surfaced a central tension: institutional capital is enormous, interested, and still mostly watching.

Sponsored

Sponsored

The $2 Trillion Thought Experiment

Nicholas Peach, head of APAC iShares at BlackRock, framed the opportunity in simple math. With roughly $108 trillion in household wealth across Asia, even a 1% allocation to crypto would translate into nearly $2 trillion in inflows, equivalent to about 60% of the current market.

BlackRock’s IBIT, the US-listed spot Bitcoin ETF launched in January 2024, has grown to roughly $53 billion in assets, the fastest-growing ETF in history, with Asian investors accounting for a significant share of flows.

Asia Is Already Building the On-Ramps

If institutions want familiar structures, someone has to build them. That race is well underway — and Asia is leading.

Laurent Poirot, Head of Product Strategy and Development for Derivatives at SGX Group, told BeInCrypto in an interview that the exchange’s crypto perpetual futures — launched in late November — reached $2 billion in cumulative trading volume within two months, making it one of the fastest product launches for SGX. More than 60% of trading activity occurred during Asian hours, in contrast to CME, where US hours dominate. Institutional demand is concentrated in Bitcoin and Ethereum, and SGX is prioritizing options and dated futures to complete the funding curve rather than expanding into additional tokens.

Notably, SGX has no plans to expand into altcoins. Institutional demand concentrates on Bitcoin and Ethereum; the next step is options and dated futures to complete the funding curve, not a longer list of tokens.

In Japan, major banks are developing stablecoin solutions to create regulated rails for traditional capital, according to Fakhul Miah of GoMining Institutional, who pointed to Hong Kong’s recent approval of ETFs and perpetuals as another major liquidity driver.

Wendy Sun of Matrixport noted that while stablecoin settlement and RWA tokenization dominate industry conversation, internal treasury adoption of stablecoins still awaits standardization. Institutional behavior, she said, is becoming “rule-based and scheduled” rather than opportunistic.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Different Languages: When TradFi Meets On-Chain Yield

At HashKey Cloud’s side event, the gap between what institutions want and what crypto offers became tangible.

Louis Rosher of Zodia Custody — backed by Standard Chartered — described a fundamental trust problem. Traditional financial institutions group all crypto-native firms together and distrust them by default. “A bank CEO with a 40-year career won’t stake it on a single crypto-native counterparty,” Rosher said. Zodia’s strategy is to leverage established banking brands to bridge that gap — a dynamic he projected would persist for the next decade or two. The firm is building DeFi yield access through a Wallet Connect integration, but within a permissioned framework in which each DApp is vetted individually before being offered to clients.

Steven Tung of Quantum Solutions, Japan’s largest digital asset treasury company, identified a more mundane but critical barrier: reporting format. Institutions don’t want block explorers — they want daily statements, audit trails, and custody proofs in formats their compliance teams already understand. Without traditional-style reporting, he argued, the vast majority of institutional capital will never arrive.

Samuel Chong of Lido outlined three prerequisites for institutional-grade participation: the protocol’s security, ecosystem maturity, including custodian integration and slashing insurance, and regulatory alignment with traditional finance frameworks. He also flagged privacy as a hidden barrier — institutions fear that on-chain position exposure invites front-running and targeted attacks.

Regulation: The Variable That Controls Everything

Anthony Scaramucci used his fireside chat to walk through the Clarity Act — the US market structure bill working through the Senate — and its three key sticking points: the level of KYC/AML requirements for DeFi, whether exchanges can pay interest on stablecoins, and restrictions on crypto investments by the Trump administration and its affiliates.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Scaramucci predicted the bill would pass, driven less by conviction than by political math: young Democratic senators don’t want to face crypto industry PAC money in their next elections. But he warned that Trump’s personal crypto ventures — including meme coins — are slowing the process. He called Trump objectively better for crypto than Biden or Harris, while criticizing the self-dealing as harmful to the industry.

That tension was visible on stage when Zak Folkman, co-founder of Trump-linked World Liberty Financial, teased a new forex platform called World Swap built around the project’s USD1 stablecoin. The project’s lending platform has already attracted hundreds of millions in deposits, but its proximity to a sitting president remains a legislative complication Scaramucci flagged directly.

Meanwhile, Asia isn’t waiting. Regulators in Hong Kong, Singapore, and Japan are establishing frameworks that institutions can actually use. Fakhul Miah noted that institutional onboarding now requires passing “risk committees and operational governance structures” — infrastructure that didn’t exist for on-chain products until recently.

The Market Between Cycles

Binance Co-CEO Richard Teng addressed the Oct. 10 crash head-on, attributing $19 billion in liquidations to macroeconomic shocks — US tariffs and Chinese rare-earth controls — rather than exchange-specific failures. “The US equity market alone saw $150 billion of liquidation,” he said. “The crypto market is much smaller.”

But his broader reading was more revealing. “Retail demand is somewhat more muted compared to the past year, but the institutional deployment, the corporate deployment is still strong,” Teng said. “The smart money is deploying.”

Vicky Wang, president of Amber Premium, put numbers to the shift. Institutional crypto transactions in Asia grew 70% year over year to reach $2.3 trillion by mid-2025, she said. But capital allocation remains conservative — institutions overwhelmingly prefer market-neutral and yield strategies over directional bets. “The institutional participation in Asia, I would say it’s real, but at the same time it’s very cautious,” Wang said.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Among industry participants at the event, the mood was more somber. Trading teams at institutional side events were significantly down from the previous year, with most running identical strategies. The consensus among fund managers was that crypto is becoming a license-driven business where compliance and traditional financial credibility matter more than crypto-native experience. Some noted that serious projects now prefer Nasdaq or HKEX IPOs over token listings — a reversal unthinkable two years ago.

The Endgame Is Finance

Solana Foundation President Lily Liu may have delivered the conference’s clearest thesis. Blockchain’s core value, she argued, is not digital ownership, social networks, or gaming — it’s finance and markets. Her “internet capital markets” framework positions blockchain as infrastructure for making every financial asset accessible to everyone online.

“The end state is moving into assets that have value, can also command price, and bring more inclusivity for five and a half billion people on the internet into capital markets,” Liu said.

GSR’s CJ Fong predicted that most tokenized real-world assets will ultimately be classified as securities, requiring crypto firms to bridge to traditional market infrastructure. That means more competition from traditional players — but also the legitimacy that institutional capital demands.

The $2 trillion that Peach described isn’t arriving tomorrow. But the plumbing is being laid — in Hong Kong, Singapore, Tokyo, and on SGX’s order books — by institutions that have decided crypto is worth building for, even if they’re not ready to bet on it.

Inside Consensus Hong Kong 2026 — This series covers the key debates and trends that emerged from Consensus Hong Kong 2026, drawing on main stage sessions, side events, and on-the-ground interviews during the second week of February.
1. The RWA War: Stablecoins, Speed, and Control
2. Crypto’s AI Pivot: Hype, Infrastructure, and a Two-Year Countdown
3. Crypto’s TradFi Moment: Institutions Are In, but on Their Terms

TLDR

• Crypto scammers have targeted Trezor and Ledger users with fraudulent letters aimed at stealing recovery phrases.
• The fake letters include QR codes that lead users to phishing websites designed to steal sensitive wallet information.
• Cybersecurity expert Dmitry Smilyanets was among the first to report the phishing scam involving Trezor.
• Ledger and Trezor never ask users to share recovery phrases through emails, physical mail, or websites.
• These phishing attempts are part of ongoing scams exploiting data breaches from 2020 and 2024.

Users of cryptocurrency hardware wallets, including Ledger and Trezor, have again reported receiving fraudulent letters aimed at stealing their recovery seed phrases. These scams have been ongoing for several years, fueled by leaks from major data breaches. The latest wave of attacks, targeting wallet owners, involves fake letters with QR codes that lead victims to phishing websites.

Scammers Use Holograms and Fake Letters to Lure Victims

Cybersecurity expert Dmitry Smilyanets was among the first to report the latest scam, receiving a letter from Trezor on February 13. The letter, which warns users to complete an “Authentication Check” by February 15, contains a fake hologram and a QR code. Smilyanets shared that the QR code leads to a fraudulent website that mimics official Trezor and Ledger setup pages.

The letter claims to be signed by Matěj Žák, who is actually the CEO of Trezor, but the letter falsely attributes this to Ledger. The scam urges users to act quickly, creating a sense of urgency that often leads to poor decisions. This type of social engineering tactic is common in phishing attacks designed to steal sensitive information.

Ledger Users Targeted with Similar Phishing Tactics

This scam isn’t new for Ledger users. In October of 2022, a Ledger user reported receiving a similar letter, which instructed them to complete a “Transaction Check” process. Like the Trezor phishing attempt, the letter included a QR code that led victims to a fraudulent site designed to steal wallet recovery phrases.

Legitimate hardware wallet providers like Ledger and Trezor never ask users to share their recovery phrases via email, phone, or physical mail. Both companies have repeatedly warned users against entering sensitive information on suspicious websites or following unsolicited communication. Despite these warnings, phishing scams continue to adapt and evolve, successfully tricking some users into revealing their private details.

Phishing Websites Harvest Recovery Phrases for Theft

Upon scanning the malicious QR code, users are directed to a fake site where they are prompted to enter their wallet recovery phrases. Once entered, the recovery phrase is transmitted to the attackers, who can then steal the user’s funds. The scam’s clever design tricks even experienced users into entering critical information.

Legitimate wallets never request recovery phrases over the internet or through any communication channels outside of the user’s direct control. The rise of these scams highlights the importance of vigilance among cryptocurrency users, particularly during times of heightened anxiety such as market downturns.

These phishing attempts are part of a broader trend, with data breaches from 2020 and 2024 leading to the exposure of customer information. Trezor’s January 2024 breach, which leaked nearly 66,000 customer details, illustrates the ongoing challenges users face in protecting their assets. Despite security measures, opportunistic attacks are frequent and sophisticated, making it more important than ever to remain cautious and informed.

Scammers Continue to Exploit User Vulnerabilities

Cybersecurity experts have warned that scammers will likely continue to exploit vulnerabilities in the cryptocurrency ecosystem. Deddy Lavid, CEO of cybersecurity firm Cyvers, explained that scams tend to evolve, especially in times of market instability. While scams may slow in times of low market speculation, fear-based tactics, such as fake compliance alerts, become more effective.

Crypto hardware wallet users are encouraged to report any suspicious communications immediately and verify the authenticity of any requests they receive. Both Ledger and Trezor have detailed security guidelines on their websites to help users recognize potential scams.

PI has returned to the top 50 alts by market cap, while M has exploded by double digits.

Bitcoin was stopped once again at the coveted $70,000 resistance yesterday, and the asset slipped by over two grand in the following hours, currently struggling below $68,000.

Most larger-cap alts have continued their sluggish business week performance, with XRP well below $1.50 and DOGE dipping below $0.10.

BTC Below $68K Again

The primary cryptocurrency reacted well to the price drop on February 6 when it plunged to its lowest position since October 2024 at $60,000. After losing $30,000 in just over a week, the asset went on the offensive and almost immediately rocketed to $72,000.

It faced resistance at that point and spent the following days trading between $68,000 and $72,000. The lower boundary gave in last Friday, but the bulls quickly intercepted the move and didn’t allow further declines.

Just the opposite; BTC started to recover some ground over the weekend and neared $71,000 on a couple of occasions. It couldn’t continue north, though, and the subsequent rejections pushed it south to under $68,000 yesterday after another unsuccessful breakout attempt.

Bitcoin continues to trade below that level as of press time, with its market cap declining further to $1.355 trillion on CG. Its dominance over the alts has also been hit and is now below 56.5%.

PI Back in Top 50

Ethereum has failed at reclaiming the $2,000 resistance after another minor daily decline. XRP has lost the $1.50 support following a 2.3% drop since yesterday. The OG meme coin is beneath $0.10 as it nearly erased all gains posted during the weekend. SOL, ADA, HYPE, and LINK are also slightly in the red, while BNB and TRX have posted insignificant gains.

Pi Network’s native token has turned green daily, jumping to almost $0.18. Recall that the asset went through a wild ride in the past week, from an all-time low of $0.1312 to a local peak of over $0.20 before it settled now. Nevertheless, it has returned to the top 50 alts by market cap as its own is at $1.6 billion.

The other big gainers from the top 100 alts are STABLE (15%), M (14%), and NEXO (8%). The total crypto market cap, though, has slipped back down to $2.4 trillion on CG.

The market is increasingly turning against the US dollar, with short positions at their highest level since January 2012, according to Bank of America’s foreign exchange and rates sentiment survey.

This shift in sentiment comes as the US Dollar Index, which tracks the value of the greenback against a weighted basket of six major currencies, has declined 1.3% year to date.

Sponsored

Record Bearish Positioning Reflects Deep Skepticism About the Dollar 

The latest Bank of America survey finds dollar positioning in February reached its most negative level in more than 14 years. Moreover, overall dollar exposure has fallen below the lows of April 2025, signaling continued loss of confidence among fund managers.

Despite efforts to restore confidence in the Federal Reserve, skepticism remains. President Trump’s January 2026 nomination of Kevin Warsh as Fed Chair aimed to reassure investors in US monetary policy. Nevertheless, this move has not lifted dollar demand.

“Survey respondents see further signs of US labor market weakness as the main risk for a lower dollar,” WSJ reported.

Meanwhile, the bearish sentiment comes amid a substantial slide in the US Dollar Index. In 2025, the index fell 9.4%, with declines continuing this year.

On January 27, DXY fell to 95.5, its lowest level since February 2022. At the time of writing, DXY recovered to reach 97.08.

Sponsored

DXY at Crossroads as Traders Debate Breakdown Versus Bottom 

Market analysts are increasingly pointing to technical signals that point to further downside for the US dollar. Trader Donny forecasted that the index could decline below the 96 level.

“I’m seeing another bearish leg forming on the DXY,” he wrote.

Other analysts are looking even further out. The Long Investor highlighted longer-term charts that, in his view, outline a much deeper structural decline. He suggested that bearish targets could extend into the 52–60 range over the 2030s.

Sponsored

The Bitcoin vs. gold debate has heated up over the past few months as investors reassess inflation risks and the future direction of monetary policy. 

Yet according to one market strategist, the divide now extends beyond portfolio hedging. In his view, it reflects something far larger: a wager on the trajectory of the American economy itself.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Bitcoin vs Gold: Two Assets, Two Visions of America’s Path 

In a recent post, James E. Thorne, Chief Market Strategist at Wellington-Altus, framed the two assets as opposing bets on the trajectory of the US economy. 

“For the record. Bitcoin Is a Bet on Trump’s Success. Gold Is a Bet on America’s Failure,” Thorne wrote.

The strategist explained that gold, in his view, has become what he described as a “verdict.” Rather than simply protecting against inflation or volatility, he argued that rising demand for gold reflects a growing lack of confidence in “Trump’s economic revolution” and the ability of policymakers to reform an economy burdened by excessive debt.

According to Thorne, investors piling into gold are effectively betting that the US will continue down a path of monetary expansion, debt accumulation, and currency debasement. 

“It is the old guard’s confession that they see only one way out of excessive leverage: print, debase, and hope the music doesn’t stop,” he remarked. “Trump, Bessent, and Warsh argue there is another path: reform the Fed, end the subsidy to idle reserves, stop paying banks to sit on cash, and force capital out of sterile Treasury holdings and back into the productive economy where it belongs.”

By contrast, Thorne positioned Bitcoin as a “speculative flag of success.” He suggested that it is a digital bet that regulatory clarity for the crypto sector, including measures such as the proposed CLARITY Act, alongside broader policy shifts, would position the US as a global crypto hub.

Sponsored

Sponsored

In this “split-screen” vision of the future, gold signals doubt that America can grow its way out of mounting fiscal pressures, while Bitcoin reflects confidence that reform-driven growth can reduce the real burden of debt.

“If Trump’s program works, if growth, deregulation, and redirected capital start to shrink the real burden of debt instead of inflating it away, Wall Street will have to rediscover its purpose: generating credit for builders, not rent for bondholders. Then those who rushed into gold as a monument to decline will face a brutal reckoning: their ‘safe haven’ will stand as a shiny, inert tribute to one vast miscalculation — that America would fail just as its leaders chose to make it succeed,” Thorne mentioned.

Bitcoin’s Safe-Haven Narrative Faces Scrutiny

The remarks come at a time when gold has surged amid macroeconomic uncertainty despite volatility. On the other hand, Bitcoin has experienced notable drawdowns, reigniting debate over its store-of-value narrative.

Trader Ran Neuner recently raised concerns over Bitcoin’s response amid periods of genuine market stress and uncertainty.

“For the first time in 12 years, I’m questioning Bitcoin’s thesis,” he said. “We fought for ETF approval. We fought for institutional access. We wanted it inside the system. Now it is. There is nothing to fight for anymore.”

Neuner argued that episodes marked by tariff disputes, currency tensions, and fiscal instability presented a real-world test for Bitcoin’s safe-haven narrative. During those periods, however, investor flows appeared to favor gold over digital assets.

With exchange-traded funds approved and institutional channels widely available, access to Bitcoin is no longer a structural constraint. This removes a longstanding explanation for muted performance during stress events.

He also pointed to subdued retail engagement and weaker speculative momentum compared to prior cycles. While this does not imply a structural breakdown for Bitcoin, he suggested it raises questions about whether its investment thesis remains as clear-cut as it once appeared.

Binance logs three straight months of heavy stablecoin outflows, erasing $9B in reserves and signaling a sustained liquidity squeeze across crypto markets.

Binance has recorded three consecutive months of negative stablecoin netflows, marking a sustained contraction in crypto market liquidity, according to data shared by CryptoQuant.

The outflows represent the longest comparable stretch since the 2023 bear market, the data showed.

Monthly figures indicate an acceleration in the trend. December saw approximately $1.8 billion in net stablecoin outflows, followed by nearly $2.9 billion in January, according to the data. February outflows have reached close to $3 billion despite the month being only halfway complete.

Binance’s stablecoin reserves have declined from approximately $50.9 billion in November to $41.8 billion, representing a contraction of nearly $9 billion, the data indicated.

Stablecoin outflows from major exchanges typically indicate capital leaving the exchange ecosystem rather than being redeployed into other crypto assets, according to market analysts. Stablecoins serve as readily deployable capital in cryptocurrency markets, and declining balances reduce the capacity to absorb price volatility.

The outflows occur amid elevated global uncertainty and geopolitical tensions, factors that market observers say may be influencing investor behavior toward more defensive positioning.

The trend has continued without signs of stabilization, according to the latest available data from CryptoQuant.

Bitcoin has plunged nearly 50% from its all-time highs, but investor and entrepreneur Kevin O’Leary says the real story goes far beyond price action.

In a recent post, O’Leary argued that while sharp drawdowns are nothing new for Bitcoin (BTC), institutional behavior is evolving and a new technological threat is entering the conversation: quantum computing.

“Bitcoin just took another brutal correction… but something bigger is happening underneath,” O’Leary wrote. He pointed to the October market meltdown, when Bitcoin tumbled and much of the broader crypto market collapsed 80–90%, with many tokens never recovering.

According to O’Leary, institutions have since become more selective.

“If you want 90% of the upside and volatility in crypto, you only need Bitcoin and Ethereum,” he said, dismissing smaller tokens as “worthless” in the eyes of large capital allocators.

O’Leary maintains he is still long Bitcoin. However, he says institutional investors are hesitating due to rising concerns that future quantum computers could theoretically break cryptographic security underpinning blockchain networks. While such a threat remains speculative and likely years away, he argues it is enough to cap institutional exposure at around 3% allocations until there is greater clarity.

“They’ll stay cautious, they’ll stay disciplined, and they’ll wait,” O’Leary noted, suggesting the next major leg higher may depend as much on technological reassurance as macro conditions.

Bitcoin price analysis: Weak momentum, key levels in focus

Meanwhile, the daily BTC/USDT chart shows Bitcoin trading around $68,100 after a sharp cascade from the mid-$90,000 region earlier this year.

A capitulation wick near the $60,000 zone marked a local bottom, followed by a modest relief bounce. However, price action has since stalled, moving sideways just below the $70,000 psychological level.

The Balance of Power indicator sits at -0.58, signaling sellers retain short-term control. Meanwhile, the Chaikin Money Flow (20) remains slightly negative at -0.06, indicating weak capital inflows and a lack of strong accumulation.

Immediate resistance lies near $70,000–$72,000, where recent candles have repeatedly rejected upside attempts. A break above that zone could open the door toward $75,000.

On the downside, $65,000 stands as initial support, with the $60,000 capitulation low acting as a critical structural floor. A loss of that level would likely intensify bearish pressure.

XRP is attempting to regain upward momentum after weeks of consolidation. Recent price action suggests a potential breakout from a bullish triangle pattern.

Market conditions remain critical for confirmation. While volatility persists across the broader cryptocurrency market, XRP’s structure indicates building pressure.

Sponsored

Sponsored

XRP Holders Support The Breakout

On-chain data shows steady support from long-term XRP holders. The HODLer Net Position Change metric currently reflects consistent accumulation. Green bars on the indicator signal capital inflows into long-term wallets.

This pattern suggests conviction among experienced investors. Long-term holders tend to accumulate during consolidation phases. Their support can stabilize the price during uncertainty. Sustained inflows strengthen the probability of a breakout by reducing available supply on exchanges.

Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here.

Another key indicator, the Spent Output Profit Ratio, or SOPR, provides further insight. SOPR measures whether investors are selling at a profit or a loss. A reading below 1.0 signals realized losses, while a reading above it reflects profitable selling.

XRP’s SOPR has climbed back above 1.0. This shift indicates investors are no longer capitulating at losses. Instead, they are transacting at profit levels. Improving profitability often restores confidence and encourages healthier capital rotation, which can support upward price movement.

Sponsored

Sponsored

XRP Price Levels To Watch

XRP is currently forming a symmetrical triangle pattern. Technical analysis projects a potential 33% breakout if resistance levels are breached. For now, confirmation requires a sustained move above $1.70. Without this breakout, the price remains within the consolidation boundaries.

A move past $1.58 would signal early breakout momentum. Strong investor support could then help XRP flip $1.70 into a new support level. If sustained buying pressure continues, the altcoin may advance beyond $1.80, reinforcing bullish technical structure.

However, resistance remains a concern. The CBD Heatmap indicates notable supply concentration between $1.76 and $1.78. Many investors accumulated XRP in this range. As price revisits these levels, some may sell to offset losses, potentially limiting upward momentum.

If bullish momentum fails entirely, downside risk increases. A rejection could push XRP below the $1.47 support level. Such a move may lead to renewed consolidation above $1.37, similar to patterns observed in early February. This scenario would invalidate the near-term bullish thesis.

Bitcoin BTC$68,131.79 is struggling to build any upward momentum, even as the key panic gauge pulls back from its early-month high and hints at renewed stability.

Bitcoin’s 30-day implied volatility, the fear or panic gauge, which reflects investors’ expectations for price swings over 4 weeks, has dropped to an annualised 52%, according to data source Volmex. The decline has reversed the early-month spike, which saw the index rise from roughly 48% to nearly 100% as bitcoin crashed to nearly $60,000.

The receding volatility suggests that panic has ebbed and that investors are no longer chasing options or hedging instruments as frantically as during the crash.

Options are derivative contracts offering insurance against price swings. A call option allows you to profit from upside price volatility in BTC, while a put option protects against price slides. Demand for options influences implied volatility.

“Implied volatility has dropped, and deleveraging is running out of steam, analysts at Bitfinex said in an email to CoinDesk, noting the newfound stability and ebbing of panic.

Still, bitcoin’s price remains under pressure, trading just under $68,000 at press time, a 1.2% drop over the past 24 hours, per CoinDesk data. The early-month sell-off fizzled near $60,000 on Feb. 6, sparking a recovery, but prices haven’t sustainably moved above $70,000 since.

That’s telling of weak demand.

“Funding rates have yet to show appetite for aggressive re-leveraging and derivatives markets support the view of a stabilization rather than renewed buying,” Bitfinex analysts explained.

Perpetual funding rates are periodic payments exchanged between long and short traders in crypto perpetual futures contracts to keep the contract price anchored to the spot price. A positive rate implies that longs (buyers betting on price rises) pay shorts (sellers betting on drops), signaling more bullish positioning in the market. A negative rate suggests a bias for short positions.

While the implied volatility has receded sharply, funding rates in BTC perpetuals remain just above zero, a sign of mild bullish leanings among traders, but nothing aggressive yet.

Institutional appetite hasn’t been great either. The U.S.-listed spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds have registered a net outflow of $677.98 million this month, extending a three-month streak of redemptions, according to data source SoSoValue.

Macro offers hope

Battered bulls can pin their hopes on the dwindling U.S. inflation and lower real yields, which could offer a tailwind to risk assets and non-yielding assets like bitcoin.

Data released last week showed the consumer price index (CPI) slowed to 2.4% year-on-year in January from 2.7% in December, strengthening hopes for at least two 25 basis-point rate cuts by the Fed this year.

The real or inflation-adjusted yield on the U.S. 10-year Treasury note fell to 1.8%, the lowest since Dec. 1. A decline in real yield typically prompts investors to increase exposure to assets like bitcoin.

“Lower real yields reduce the relative carry disadvantage of non-yielding assets such as Bitcoin, while a softer dollar supports global liquidity conditions,” Bitfinex analysts noted.