Crypto World
Crypto PACs Amass Millions Ahead of Midterms
As the United States moves toward the 2026 midterm elections, crypto industry lobbying and fundraising activity has accelerated, highlighting a strategic shift in how the sector seeks to shape policy. Super PACs linked to crypto interests have begun pooling funds, with a notable fundraising push that includes a main industry vehicle and prominent tech donors. The landscape features a blend of bipartisan engagement and party-aligned advocacy, underscored by legislative efforts such as the CLARITY Act, which has stalled in the Senate even as committees in the House advance. This push comes amid a broader backdrop of regulatory scrutiny, market volatility, and debates over how best to foster innovation while protecting consumers.
Key takeaways
- The crypto sector’s political spending surged last cycle, with total contributions reaching at least $245 million in 2024, signaling a robust, well-funded lobbying posture ahead of midterm elections.
- Fairshake, the industry’s leading super PAC, raised about $133 million in 2025 and now holds more than $190 million in cash on hand, reflecting significant donor commitments from major players including a16z, Coinbase, and Ripple.
- Discontent about influence in Washington is real among reform groups, who warn that large, industry-aligned money can marginalize ordinary voters and complicate democratic processes.
- Crypto donors are pursuing a bipartisan strategy, supporting both parties or pivoting to align with policymakers who promise a friendlier regulatory environment, while some in Congress push for a unified framework like the CLARITY Act.
- Historical context matters: the sector’s political clout has grown since the 2020–2021 lobbying surge and the FTX collapse, which did not halt the industry’s push to engage lawmakers and shape policy on market structure and consumer protection.
Tickers mentioned: $BTC, $ETH, $COIN
Market context: As the midterm cycle sharpens, the crypto lobby’s visibility in Washington mirrors broader regulatory debates and a shifting investment climate. The policy trajectory—particularly around market structure and stablecoins—remains uncertain, even as lobby groups deploy sizable resources to influence committees and votes.
Why it matters
The scale of money funneled into crypto lobbying marks a meaningful departure from earlier eras of campaign finance. Industry-aligned super PACs have become major players, capable of marshaling independent expenditures and transfers to allied committees in a way that can outpace more traditional advocacy channels. This dynamic matters for users, investors, and builders because policy decisions—ranging from regulatory clarity to enforcement actions—directly affect product innovation, market access, and consumer protections.
Observers say the growing influence of well-funded crypto PACs is changing the calculus inside Congress. While some lawmakers welcome clearer rules and a predictable regulatory environment, critics argue that high-dollar donations risk sidelining everyday constituents and distorting legislative priorities. The tension between fostering innovation and imposing guardrails is at the core of ongoing debates about market structure, stablecoins, and the broader crypto economy. The argument is not merely about dollars and elections; it touches the core question of how the American political system can balance rapid technological change with responsible oversight.
Within this landscape, the industry’s messaging is increasingly tailored to bipartisan themes, while some prominent figures invest in politically aligned avenues that promise favorable outcomes. The Winklevoss twins’ support for a conservative pro-crypto fund, for example, underscores a strategic tilt toward candidates perceived as crypto-friendly, even as others push for more centrist or Democratic support to maintain broad accessibility to policymakers. The result is a more nuanced, multi-faceted lobbying approach that seeks to hedge policy risk across party lines and ideological spectrums.
Looking back, the sector’s political activity has evolved alongside its own evolution as a market sector. During the 2020–2021 bull run, crypto firms ramped up advertising and public-relations campaigns, while high-profile names in the industry entered politics or attempted to influence policy through visible campaigns. The FTX saga and related enforcement actions accelerated a broader embrace of Washington engagement, as industry participants sought to define a path toward functioning product rails under a potential regulatory framework.
In Congress, the debate often centers on balance. Proponents argue that a comprehensive framework could unlock innovation and reduce uncertainty, while opponents warn against overreach that could stifle the development of new financial products. The debate around a major piece of legislation, commonly referred to as the CLARITY Act, illustrates this tug-of-war: supporters contend that clear rules would legitimize the sector and invite responsible participants to operate within a defined system, whereas critics warn that the bill may still fall short of satisfying industry stakeholders and ethics officials in the Senate.
One notable donor in the crypto space—Bankman-Fried—made headlines years earlier with immense campaign contributions, a fact cited by prosecutors as part of a broader indictment about how influence was used to push for policies favorable to his business interests. His case serves as a cautionary backdrop to current financing strategies, illustrating how the line between political advocacy and business priorities can blur in high-velocity markets. While Bankman-Fried has faced severe legal scrutiny, the broader ecosystem continues to pursue access to policymakers, albeit with increased attention on governance, compliance, and transparency.
As the 2024 cycle demonstrated, crypto funding did not merely surge; it also diversified. The Fairshake network, originally built as a single-issue pro-crypto fund, grew into a hub for multiple committees and independent expenditures. Its disclosed activity included substantial support for Democrats during the 2023–2024 period, alongside other, more conservative-aligned committees. This diversification is indicative of a broader strategy: deploying resources to achieve leverage across the political spectrum, while maintaining an emphasis on lawmakers perceived as aligned with crypto-friendly regulatory approaches.
“Super PACs are increasingly becoming in vogue for special interests who want to make their presence known in Washington,” said Michael Beckel, research director of Issue One, noting that large, industry-backed reservoirs of cash have become a significant force in shaping policy outcomes. As a result, the cadence and flow of money—both donations and independent expenditures—have become a persistent feature of the policy landscape, with significant implications for how regulations are written and how quickly they move through Congress.
“Industry-aligned super PACs with huge bank accounts have made a huge splash and helped thwart new regulations on their business interests.”
Beyond the halls of Congress, attention has turned to broader governance questions, including the ongoing debate around market structure, consumer protections, and the role of stablecoins in a broad financial ecosystem. The White House has hosted closed-door discussions among crypto and banking leaders in a bid to bridge gaps, but public progress remains cautious, with officials signaling that meaningful consensus may require additional time and negotiation. The dynamic between White House oversight, Senate deliberations, and industry lobbying will likely shape the regulatory timetable for years to come.
As election season resumes, the crypto lobby’s influence remains a core variable in policy outcomes. The sector’s strategy—balancing donor networks, bipartisan outreach, and legislative pressure—highlights how political influence now intersects with technology policy in a way that goes beyond traditional lobbying. If lawmakers can craft a coherent, forward-looking framework that protects consumers while enabling innovation, it could mark a watershed moment for both the crypto industry and the broader financial ecosystem. If not, the divergence between policy ambitions and practical implementation could prolong regulatory uncertainty for years ahead.
What to watch next
- Tracking the CLARITY Act’s status in the Senate and any new consensus on market structure legislation (dates and committee votes).
- Updates on major crypto donors’ disclosures and whether new transparency rules affect PACs and independent expenditures.
- White House-industry talks outcomes and potential regulatory proposals touching stablecoins and consumer protections.
- Upcoming midterm dynamics and how shifts in party control may influence crypto-friendly policy initiatives.
- Monitoring any shifts in the funding strategy of Fairshake and its affiliated committees as the 2026 cycle approaches.
Sources & verification
- FEC committee records for Fairshake (C00835959) and its 2024–2025 activity.
- Open Secrets data on Fairshake expenditures and donor contributions from 2023–2024.
- Reuters reporting on Bankman-Fried’s political donations and related investigations.
- Politico commentary on the blockchain network and party strategy in 2025.
- Senate roll-call votes related to the GENIUS Act and related crypto policy debates.
Crypto money and the midterm race: donors, policy, and power
Political action committees representing the crypto industry have already mobilized substantial funding as the United States heads toward its 2026 midterm elections. The focal point is a blend of large, unrestricted sums and more targeted campaigns designed to influence key policymakers and committees. The industry’s flagship super PAC, Fairshake, has emerged as a central vehicle for fundraising and political spending, with documented contributions and independent expenditures that exceed a century-and-a-half in collective capacity when combined with allied groups.
Last year, the crypto industry spent at least $245 million on campaign contributions, a figure that underscored the sector’s appetite for influence. The main super PAC funded by the industry, Fairshake, raised about $133 million in 2025, and its cash on hand now exceeds $190 million. Notable backers include venture-capital powerhouse a16z which contributed an initial $24 million, with Coinbase and Ripple each donating $25 million. The scale here is not merely academic: it represents a deliberate attempt to tilt regulatory and legislative outcomes in ways that supporters argue will create a more predictable environment for innovation and growth, while critics warn of the democratic perils of concentrated influence.
Activist groups have pressed back, arguing that large, industry-backed money undermines the voice of everyday Americans. “This kind of influence buying ultimately undermines the democratic process by marginalizing everyday Americans, ensuring that their voices and interests take a backseat to the crypto industry’s deregulatory desires,” said Saurav Ghosh, director of the Campaign Legal Center. The concern is not limited to the abstract; it centers on the real-world risk that policy outcomes could skew toward a narrow set of corporate interests rather than broad public goals, particularly as midterm dynamics favor the party controlling the House, Senate, or White House.
The broader political calculus shows crypto lobbying pursuing a degree of bipartisanship, even as the industry remains most comfortable with a regulatory posture that favors innovation. The Senate’s posture toward the CLARITY Act remains a barometer of how far policymakers are willing to go in crafting a comprehensive framework. The act advanced in the House this summer, but in the Senate it has yet to reach a conclusion that satisfies the governance and ethics concerns raised by many Democrats. In the interim, crypto advocates have sought to demonstrate broad-based appeal, balancing support within both major parties and pushing a long-term vision of a policy regime that accommodates new financial technologies without compromising consumer protections.
Publicly, some in the industry emphasize the necessity of nonpartisan engagement. Representative Sam Liccardo, a crypto-friendly Democrat, suggested that no industry should “put eggs in one basket,” signaling a preference for diversified political support. Yet others warn that aligning too closely with one party could backfire as political winds shift. The Winklevoss twins’ strategic donations to Digital Freedom Fund illustrate how industry actors are attempting to influence the policy conversation from multiple angles, covering both conservative and liberal lanes in pursuit of favorable regulatory outcomes.
The policy dialogue has also intersected with discussions about market structure and consumer protections, with Coinbase’s leadership engaging in public debates about proposed restrictions on stablecoin yields. Coinbase argued that a blanket ban could stifle innovation and impede legitimate financial services, while supporters of tighter controls contend that consumer safety cannot be compromised in the name of rapid innovation. The White House has attempted to broker a dialogue on these issues, hosting a closed-door summit with leaders from both crypto and banking sectors; however, Reuters reports that the gathering did not yield a definitive breakthrough on policy alignment.
The broader context is a political environment in which the crypto industry’s influence is increasingly visible and, for some observers, troubling. Critics warn that a system in which wealthier donors shape policy can cast doubt on the electorate’s ability to influence outcomes. Election-oversight advocates argue that this trend could erode trust in democratic institutions if policy results appear engineered to accommodate corporate interests rather than public benefit. In this light, the ongoing lobbying activity surrounding the CLARITY Act, the market structure debate, and related regulatory proposals will be essential to watch as the 2026 midterms approach.
As with any sector undergoing rapid evolution, the stakes are high for users, investors, and builders who rely on a stable, transparent policy framework. The current cycle demonstrates that money, messaging, and momentum can affect the speed and direction of regulatory developments, even in a landscape as complex and dynamic as crypto. The coming months will reveal whether policymakers can translate high-level objectives into clear, workable rules that support innovation while safeguarding the integrity of financial markets.
- XRP rises to $1.36 on institutional optimism and CEO remarks.
- Technical relief bounce supported by oversold conditions and volume surge.
- Key levels to watch are the support at $1.33 and the resistance at $1.40.
XRP has seen a notable lift in the past 24 hours, climbing to $1.36 and outperforming much of the broader market.
The rally appears to be driven by a combination of technical relief and renewed confidence from institutional investors.
Over the past 24 hours, trading volume surged nearly 50%, signalling that buyers are stepping in after the recent oversold conditions.
Ripple CEO commentary sparks optimism
A major factor behind this price movement is the recent commentary from Ripple’s CEO, Brad Garlinghouse.
In a March 27 Fox interview, Garlinghouse highlighted a growing demand for digital assets and stablecoins from traditional financial institutions.
He emphasised that the crypto landscape is maturing, with more banks and investment firms considering digital assets as part of their portfolios.
Garlinghouse also underscored progress on regulatory fronts, particularly regarding the anticipated CLARITY Act.
The CEO indicated that the act could provide clearer guidelines for crypto operations, fostering confidence among institutional participants.
The combination of regulatory clarity and increased interest from financial firms has sent a strong signal to traders.
Market participants appear to be reacting positively, interpreting the remarks as validation that XRP is positioned for broader adoption in the traditional finance sector.
Reports of large institutional XRP holdings, such as Goldman Sachs’ exposure through XRP ETFs, have further reinforced the bullish narrative.
Technical relief supports the bounce
Alongside these fundamental drivers, XRP’s technical indicators also support the recent surge.
The 14-day Relative Strength Index (RSI) had dipped to around 44, indicating that the asset is approaching oversold territory, which has created conditions for the bounce as selling pressure eases and buyers re-enter the market.
Moreover, XRP’s price gained modest tailwinds from a slight recovery across the broader crypto market.
While the overall market movement was subdued, it contributed to the momentum that carried XRP higher.
The short-term XRP price forecast
For traders watching the immediate market, $1.33 remains a critical support level.
Remaining above this support will be crucial for any attempt to test higher levels.
In case of a continued bullish trend and XRP breaks above $1.40, analysts believe the altcoin could see additional buying pressure and extend the current relief rally.
Other notable resistance levels that traders should watch include $1.45, which has acted as a ceiling over the past week.
Sustaining momentum beyond this level could open the door to a more meaningful uptrend.
However, failure to hold $1.33 could result in a pullback toward $1.30, where buyers may re-enter.
Notably, regulatory developments, particularly progress on the CLARITY Act, will be the key catalyst in the coming weeks.
Positive news could encourage further institutional participation, while delays might keep XRP trading within the $1.30–$1.40 range.
Key Takeaways
- ARTL shares skyrocketed 618% following the company’s announcement about developing ART27.13 as a complementary treatment for GLP-1 obesity medications.
- Shares plummeted over 23% Monday when Artelo disclosed a $31.4 million fundraising initiative involving share and warrant issuance.
- The company plans to issue roughly 3.18 million shares priced at $3.45 each, generating approximately $11 million in gross revenue.
- Warrant agreements for up to 6.37 million additional shares could yield another $20.4 million if fully exercised by investors.
- The financing arrangement was structured at-the-market under Nasdaq compliance guidelines and was scheduled to finalize on March 30.
Shares of Artelo Biosciences experienced a significant downturn exceeding 23% during early trading Monday following the biotechnology firm’s announcement of a financing plan targeting up to $31.4 million through combined share and warrant issuance.
Artelo Biosciences, Inc., ARTL
This sharp decline occurred after an impressive 230.41% rally the preceding Friday, which followed by two days the company’s revelation that it was investigating ART27.13, its experimental compound, as a complementary therapeutic option for GLP-1-based obesity medications.
The strategic decision to pursue capital raising immediately following such substantial share price appreciation seems to have triggered investor apprehension regarding potential ownership dilution.
Artelo revealed it executed binding agreements for the sale of roughly 3.18 million common shares at a combined offering price of $3.45 per unit. This transaction is projected to yield gross revenues of approximately $11 million prior to deducting placement fees and related costs.
Additionally, the biotechnology company intends to issue warrants providing purchasers with rights to acquire up to 6.37 million supplementary shares. Should these warrants be fully exercised through cash payment, Artelo could secure an additional $20.4 million in funding.
The company explicitly cautioned investors that warrant exercise remains uncertain. “No assurance can be given that any of the warrants will be exercised, or that the Company will receive cash proceeds from the exercise of the warrants,” Artelo stated in its official announcement.
H.C. Wainwright & Co. serves as the sole placement agent facilitating this financing transaction.
The private offering is being executed pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act alongside Regulation D requirements. The offered securities remain unregistered under federal and state securities regulations. Artelo has committed to submitting a resale registration statement encompassing the newly issued securities.
Capital generated from this financing will be allocated toward operational expenses, settlement of specific bridge financing obligations, and broader corporate initiatives.
ART27.13’s Role in the GLP-1 Treatment Landscape
The initial dramatic price increase stemmed from Artelo’s Wednesday disclosure regarding its exploration of ART27.13 — an investigational therapeutic targeting the endocannabinoid system — as a possible adjunct therapy to GLP-1 medications.
GLP-1 therapeutics, which regulate glucose metabolism and appetite control, represent the cornerstone of the rapidly expanding obesity pharmaceutical market. This sector is currently led by Eli Lilly (LLY) and Novo Nordisk (NVO).
According to Artelo, previous clinical observations in oncology patients indicated that ART27.13 might help maintain lean muscle tissue in individuals receiving GLP-1 treatments. The company has subsequently submitted a provisional patent application addressing this therapeutic indication.
“With new non-clinical research commencing and the recent filing of a patent application covering the use of CB2 agonists with GLP-1 drugs, we are aiming to build a scientific and strategic foundation with ART27.13 in an area of potentially significant commercial relevance,” stated Andrew Yates, Artelo’s chief scientific officer.
TLDR:
- February 2026 funding rates landed in the bottom 3–15% of all historical monthly readings across major tokens.
- Every bottom-15% funding rate streak on record has recovered, with a median timeline of two to five weeks.
- SOL on Hyperliquid posted -18.33% annualized in February, the lowest reading ever recorded across all tracked pairs.
- Boros allows traders to long ETH funding rate markets and lock in fixed rates ahead of an expected mean reversion.
Funding rates across major crypto perpetual markets are raising a critical question: has the market finally bottomed?
After Bitcoin shed over 50% from its October 2025 all-time highs, perpetual funding rates collapsed to historic lows in February 2026.
Most major tokens recorded readings in the bottom 5% of all-time monthly data. Now, with crypto prices rallying despite US-Iran war escalations, traders are watching funding rates closely for early reversal signals.
February 2026 Funding Rates Dropped to Levels Never Seen Before
Funding rates in February 2026 were not just low — they were structurally outside the normal range of market history.
BTC on Binance recorded an annualized rate of -0.68%, placing it in the bottom 4.5% of all 66 months on record. That reading alone sat 12 percentage points below BTC’s historical mean of 11.8%.
ETH told an even sharper story. Binance recorded ETH at -4.03% annualized, landing in the bottom 3% of all historical monthly readings.
Hyperliquid and Lighter posted similarly depressed figures, with ETH sitting in the bottom 15% and bottom 20% respectively across those platforms.
XRP and SOL absorbed the worst damage of the month. XRP on Hyperliquid posted -12.77%, the single worst month in that market’s entire recorded history.
SOL on Hyperliquid came in at -18.33%, the lowest absolute reading among all tracked pairs across every platform.
The deviation from historical medians reinforces just how extreme the period was. SOL on Hyperliquid deviated 29.2 percentage points from its median.
BTC on Binance, the least extreme major, still deviated 7.0 percentage points. For most tokens, February was not simply a bad month — it was an anomaly by every measurable standard.
Historical Patterns Suggest These Lows Have Always Preceded a Recovery
The most telling data point in this analysis is also the simplest: every bottom-15% funding rate streak in the historical record has recovered.
That pattern holds across multiple assets, exchanges, and market cycles, including the FTX collapse of November 2022.
The median recovery time back to the bottom 55% of funding rates runs roughly two to five weeks after the streak ends.
BTC provides the clearest evidence. Its longest Binance bottom-15% streak lasted 11 weeks, beginning in March 2025.
Most other BTC streaks recovered within one to five weeks. An extended eight-week streak on Hyperliquid in mid-2023 resolved fully within five weeks of ending.
ETH’s most severe historical episode in late August 2022 averaged -18.6% over five weeks. That took 12 weeks to recover to the bottom 55%, the longest recovery on record for ETH.
More recent episodes, however, including early 2025 streaks, resolved in one to five weeks, suggesting the recovery window is compressing as the market matures.
SOL’s November 2022 streak, driven by the FTX collapse, averaged an extraordinary -468.9% annualized. Despite that severity, Binance SOL recovered to the bottom 20% within seven weeks.
Each of these cases points toward the same conclusion: deeply negative funding rates have historically acted as a contrarian signal for a coming recovery, not a permanent new baseline.
Funding Rate Markets on Boros Allow Traders to Position for the Rebound
If funding rates are indeed at a cyclical bottom, the question becomes how traders can express that view efficiently.
Boros, a funding rate derivatives platform, offers two structured approaches for traders looking to capitalize on a mean reversion in funding rates.
The first strategy targets traders who believe ETH prices will recover over the next three months. By longing ETH on any of the three platforms with June maturities — OKX, Binance, or Hyperliquid — and simultaneously longing the ETH funding rate market on Boros with the same notional amount, traders lock in a fixed funding rate. This protects against funding spikes while maintaining full upside exposure to ETH price recovery.
The second strategy is for traders focused purely on funding rate normalization, regardless of price direction. Longing ETH funding rate markets on Boros directly captures any upward move in implied or underlying APR.
The recommended approach is selecting the maturity with the lowest current implied APR to maximize the distance of a potential recovery move.
Implied APR across June ETH maturities currently sits between 2% and 5% annualized, reflecting cautious market expectations for a gradual recovery.
If underlying APR breaks its downtrend and flips positive, traders long on Boros benefit both from rising implied APR and from positive settlement payouts once underlying APR exceeds their entry point.
The Data Points to an Asymmetric Opportunity, But Margin Management Is Critical
Taken together, the February 2026 funding rate data builds a case for an asymmetric setup. Rates have reached historic lows across virtually every major token and exchange.
Historical recovery patterns are consistent. And crypto prices have already begun recovering despite ongoing geopolitical pressure, a divergence that traders are noting carefully.
Extended periods of negative funding have historically reflected consolidating or ranging markets. As Boros observed, those periods of extended low funding have always eventually ended. The question is not whether rates recover, but when — and whether traders are positioned to benefit when they do.
For those looking to long mean reversion, timing the exact bottom is not necessary. The historical data suggests the recovery window after a streak breaks is two to five weeks, giving traders a defined timeframe to manage positions. The risk is sustaining negative funding payouts during the remaining period of the streak before it turns.
Adequate margin is therefore the most important operational variable for this trade. A trader who enters too early with insufficient runway may be forced out before the recovery materializes.
The setup, however, remains compelling: deeply negative historical funding rates, a consistent track record of recovery, and structured tools through Boros that allow both fixed-rate locking and directional funding rate speculation.
TLDR:
-
- Gnosis is a founding contributor to the Ethereum Economic Zone alongside Jordi Baylina and the Ethereum Foundation.
- EEZ rollups allow smart contracts to call Ethereum mainnet contracts atomically within a single transaction.
- Protocols on EEZ rollups access Ethereum’s native liquidity directly without wrapping, bridging, or extra delays.
- Gnosis plans to define the role of GNO token and its validator set in any future EEZ implementation with its DAO.
- Gnosis is a founding contributor to the Ethereum Economic Zone alongside Jordi Baylina and the Ethereum Foundation.
Ethereum Economic Zone is the framework Gnosis is co-building to address Layer 2 fragmentation on Ethereum. Gnosis, active as a Layer 1 blockchain for seven years, is a founding contributor to this initiative.
Jordi Baylina, founder of ZisK and creator of Circom, also joins as a founding contributor. The Ethereum Foundation is also co-funding the entire development effort.
The framework centers on synchronous composability, enabling rollups to interact with Ethereum mainnet without bridges.
A Framework Built Around Composability
Ethereum scaling delivered on its core promise in recent years. Transactions became cheaper and network throughput increased steadily. However, the process fractured the ecosystem into disconnected chains rather than one unified economy.
Each rollup operates with its own liquidity, bridges, and tooling. Builders must redeploy the same products across multiple chains to reach all users. Users also face expensive bridging costs and assets scattered across chains they barely track.
Gnosis noted on X that Ethereum had scaled into fragmented islands rather than a unified economy. The Ethereum Economic Zone is designed to resolve that at the infrastructure layer. The framework allows rollup smart contracts to call Ethereum mainnet contracts within one transaction.
Calls between different rollups within the same execution are also supported. This is what developers call synchronous composability. It removes the need for bridges, wrapping, or waiting on finality.
Protocols on EEZ rollups access Ethereum’s existing liquidity directly without bridging or wrapping. A protocol can use a Uniswap mainnet pool atomically, with the same L1 guarantees. These rollups also inherit Ethereum’s full validator security with no new trust assumptions added.
What the Ethereum Economic Zone Means for Gnosis Chain
Gnosis acknowledged that its neutral blockspace thesis did not develop as expected. Blockspace became largely commoditized across the industry over time. Running a standalone Layer 1 requires constant rebuilding of DeFi infrastructure and liquidity bootstrapping.
Synchronous interoperability changes the competitive dynamic for chains like Gnosis. Projects inside a composable Ethereum domain no longer need to replicate an entire ecosystem. They can rely on shared liquidity and canonical infrastructure instead.
That shift frees up capital and engineering bandwidth for differentiation. Gnosis plans to invest more in user experiences and products like Gnosis Pay and the Gnosis App. Real-world financial integrations also become more practical under a unified model.
The Ethereum Economic Zone also connects to Gnosis’s mission of giving every person financial access. A stablecoin can now compose with a lending protocol on another chain without a bridge. A consumer app can also access the best rates across the ecosystem without workarounds.
Gnosis noted that the GNO token and validator set may have a role in a future EEZ implementation. Those details will be worked out with the Gnosis DAO community over the coming months. Technical architecture, developer tooling, and integration guides are also planned for release soon.
Solana is trading at $84, the price is down 71% from its January 2025 peak of $293, as weekly DEX volume collapses to levels not seen since early 2025, even with bullish prediction and hope. The memecoin engine that once powered Solana’s on-chain dominance is stalling.
For Solana, the next 72 hours around the Federal Reserve’s March 17–18 meeting could determine whether $80 holds or gives way entirely. One technical pattern already has a $59 target in view.
Weekly DEX volume across all networks registers at just $1.2B, way down from its $41B peak. Broader crypto market weakness in Q1 2026 hammered token speculation, with DEXs now capturing just 14.1% of centralized exchange volume, down sharply from a 21%+ peak in summer 2025.
Solana still commands the largest individual network share at $11.42B, its 30th consecutive month leading peers, propped up by persistent PumpSwap and Pump.fun activity, but even that moat is narrowing as “star token” launches dry up.
The macro and technical backdrops are converging at a critical juncture. Here’s what the data suggests about SOL’s near-term path, and where traders are repositioning capital while waiting for clarity. Deep dive into our Solana Price Prediction
Discover: The best pre-launch token sales
Solana Price Prediction: Can Solana Reclaim $96 Support?
SOL sits at $84, pinned below the $86 pivot that separates consolidation from any credible recovery attempt. Volume metrics have been deteriorating alongside price, a combination that technically confirms distribution rather than accumulation.
RSI sits at a neutral 50 area, not oversold enough to trigger mean-reversion buying on its own, while the 50-, 100-, and 200-day SMAs all signal sell. The 200-day MA has been rising since March 9, which is the one structural bright spot bulls can point to.
The head-and-shoulders pattern on the three-day chart is the dominant concern. A confirmed break below $80, assigned a 38.5% probability by current market structure, triggers the measured move toward $59. That would represent a further 28% decline from current levels. Resistance to reclaim sits at $96 first, then $105.
Discover: The best crypto to diversify your portfolio with
Maxi Doge Is an Early Mover With Upside Potential
When a leading L1 trades 70% off its highs, and DEX volumes hit annual lows, the rotation question becomes unavoidable: where does speculative capital go while waiting for the cycle to reset? Memecoin sentiment hasn’t disappeared; it has compressed, historically a precursor to violent repositioning once fear fades.
Maxi Doge ($MAXI) is a meme token built on Ethereum’s ERC-20 standard, positioning itself around what it calls “1000x leverage trading mentality,” with a canine mascot embodying the grind-and-hold bull market ethos.
The project has raised $4,7 million at a current presale price of just $0.000281, with 60% staking APY available to holders. Standout mechanics include holder-only trading competitions with leaderboard rewards and a Maxi Fund treasury allocated toward liquidity and partnerships.
Research MAXI DOGE here, and join the army.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Crypto assets are highly volatile. Always conduct your own research before investing.
The post Solana Price Prediction: DEX Activity Slumps to 1 Year Low as Memecoin Frenzy Fades appeared first on Cryptonews.
The Ethereum Foundation is stepping up its efforts to put treasury assets to work, with data from Arkham showing it staked more than 20,000 ETH on Monday, expanding its validator footprint even as yields hover below 3% and ether trades near $2,045.
Arkham data shows the transfers were split into uniform chunks of roughly 2,047 ETH.
THE ETHEREUM FOUNDATION IS STAKING ETH
The Ethereum Foundation just staked $46.2M of ETH. This is more ETH than they have EVER staked before. pic.twitter.com/gCCc0qK6VN
— Arkham (@arkham) March 30, 2026
The deposits extend a strategy first outlined in February, when the foundation said it would stake 70,000 ETH to generate yield for operations. That initial roll-out began with a 2,016 ETH deposit and positioned staking rewards as a funding source for research, ecosystem development and grants, turning long-held reserves into a steady income stream.
Based on the CoinDesk Composite Ether Staking Rate (CESR), the foundation will get a 2.7% yield from its staked ETH. This is down from 3.4% earlier in the year.
Onchain data shows that the Ethereum Foundation has another 147,400 ETH ($303 million) in its treasury.
Goldman Sachs analyst James Yaro told clients that crypto-linked equities look selectively attractive after falling 46% from their October 2025 peak.
The research note maintained Buy ratings on three names. Robinhood Markets (HOOD), Figure Technologies (FIGR), and Coinbase Global (COIN) each offer distinct upside.
Valuations Near Historical Trough Levels
Yaro noted that the current drawdown has roughly matched the average peak-to-trough decline seen in previous crypto cycles. Prices have shown volatile but stabilizing behavior over recent weeks, suggesting forced selling pressure may be easing.
“All in, we see an increasingly attractive entry point to our digital-asset sensitive coverage, albeit selectively, across the group,” a TradFi media reported, citing Yaro.
Among the three picks, Goldman cut its HOOD price target to $91 from $102 and lowered its COIN price target to $235 from $270.
However, it raised FIGR’s target to $42 from $39, implying roughly 35% upside. HOOD closed at $66.02 and COIN at $161.14 on March 28, both down sharply year to date.
Subscribe to our YouTube channel to watch leaders and journalists provide expert insights
Robinhood recently approved a $1.5 billion share buyback, signaling management confidence at current levels.
Figure Technologies, a blockchain-native lender that originated over $16 billion in on-chain home equity loans, continues to expand its capital marketplace.
Volume Risk Remains
Goldman warned that trading volumes may still dip before recovering. Yaro estimated a further slump would trim 2026 revenue by 2% and profits by 4% for these companies. Historically, trough volumes last about three months before a meaningful rebound.
The note positions the sector as oversold but not risk-free. Investors face a window where prices may have stabilized, yet volumes and volatility could still deliver sharp swings before any sustained recovery takes hold.
The post Goldman Sachs Flags 2 Crypto Stocks Worth Buying After 46% Sector Crash appeared first on BeInCrypto.
The Ethereum Foundation has accelerated its treasury staking push, deploying $46.2 million in Ether in its largest move to date after the recent BitMine sale.
On Monday, the foundation’s treasury multisignature wallet made 11 deposits into the Ethereum Beacon Deposit Contract, each of roughly 2,047 Ether (ETH), totaling 22,517 tokens worth roughly $46.2 million, according to data from Arkham Intelligence.
The Ethereum Foundation started staking ETH in February, depositing 2,016 ETH and outlining plans to stake up to 70,000 ETH, with rewards reinvested into research, ecosystem development and grants.
The foundation also deposited a smaller 31 ETH tranche earlier this month, bringing the total staked holdings to roughly 24,564 ETH as it shifts to staking to generate yield, rather than relying on periodic ETH sales, which have historically drawn criticism.
Related: Ethereum builders propose ‘economic zone’ to tackle L2 fragmentation
EF sells 5,000 ETH to BitMine in OTC deal
The new staking move comes after the EF completed an over-the-counter (OTC) sale of 5,000 Ether to BitMine Immersion Technologies, valued at about $10.2 million. The foundation said proceeds would support core operations, including protocol research, ecosystem growth and community grants.
The transaction marked the foundation’s second direct OTC sale to a corporate buyer, following a 10,000 ETH sale to SharpLink Gaming in July 2025.
The EF currently holds about $361 million in onchain assets, with the vast majority, roughly $360.8 million, held in Ether on the Ethereum network, alongside small balances across networks like Arbitrum, Optimism and Bitcoin, according to Arkham.
Related: Ethereum risks losing No. 2 spot as stablecoins gain ground
Ether price risks further decline
Ether fell below the $2,000 level over the weekend, raising the risk of a deeper correction. Analysts, including Onur, CryptoWZRD and Ted Pillows, pointed to repeated failures at $2,200 and weakening momentum, with some warning ETH could fall toward the $1,750–$1,850 range.
Demand for Ether has also turned negative, hitting its lowest level in 16 months, according to Capriole Investments.
Magazine: Ethereum’s Fusaka fork explained for dummies — What the hell is PeerDAS?
A trader pulled off a nearly 100x return on decentralized betting platform Polymarket in less than a minute, thanks to a blunder by a UFC announcer.
In Sunday’s UFC heavyweight bout, Tyrell Fortune beat Marcin Tybura to secure his first UFC victory. But the event was not without drama. Cage announcer Bruce Buffer initially read the result in favor of Tybura, a result that stood for less than a minute before Buffer corrected the mistake.
LlamaEnjoyer, a Polymarket trader, also known as Verrissimus on X, capitalized on the error, turning roughly $676 into $67,000.
When Tybura was named victor, his shares spiked toward 99 cents and Fortune’s collapsed to about 1 cent. LlamaEnjoyer said they almost placed a $100,000 bet on Tybura at 99 cents, but stopped when they realized something was awry. Instead, the trader bought $676 worth of Fortune shares at 1 cent. Seconds later, when the UFC corrected the announcement and the shares immediately jumped to $1.
“I almost bought Tybura at 99¢ with $100k. Stopped, realized something was off. Cancelled my order, scooped up 1¢ shares instead. The UFC corrected the winner seconds later. Easiest 100x ever,” Verrissimus said on X.
LlamaEnjoyer’s quick thinking illustrates how fast prediction market prices can swing during live events, especially when big announcements are misread or misreported.
The incident also raises questions about how payouts are handled when there’s an error at the “source of truth” — the reference that contracts rely on to settle outcomes. Since the error originated from the UFC announcer, there could be a dispute over payouts or contract resolution, even though the trader’s actions remain fully legitimate.
XRP price is trading at $1.36 amid renewed controversy that could rattle institutional confidence and prediction in the asset, and in the exchange that hosts much of its volume. The allegation isn’t new, but its timing is pointed.
Ripple CTO David Schwartz first raised the pay-to-list claim in 2023, and it’s back in circulation with fresh teeth. What happens next at the $1.27 support level may answer a question the chart has been asking for weeks.
Crypto commentator Pumpius reignited the dispute on X, citing Schwartz’s earlier claim that Coinbase demanded millions in listing fees before agreeing to carry XRP. According to the account, Ripple initially refused, and the asset sat off-platform until a deal was struck.
— Pumpius (@pumpius) March 29, 2026
EXPOSED: Coinbase's Greedy Gatekeeping on XRP – JoelKatz Drops the Bombshell!
Back in 2023, Ripple's CTO @JoelKatz spilled the tea on what really went down behind closed doors with @Coinbase and the $XRP listing.
Coinbase refused to list XRP. Even though it was screamingly… pic.twitter.com/crYfpUYSFF
Once listed, XRP allegedly drove approximately 20% of Coinbase’s revenue. Pumpius called it “a classic pay-to-play shakedown in the ‘decentralised’ crypto world.” At least one other X user escalated further, using the word extortion directly.
Whether the allegation is verified or an amplified rumor, the market is watching. XRP’s technical picture was already fragile before this news cycle added sentiment pressure.
Discover: The best pre-launch token sales
XRP Price Prediction: Can Ripple Hold $1.27 Support as Listing Controversy Clouds Outlook?
XRP is consolidating in a tight band between $1.32 and $1.36, flagging capitulation signals in a market that displays bearish sentiment. The near-term structure is defensive. Volume has not confirmed any directional conviction, and momentum indicators point to a market waiting.
Key levels to monitor:
- Critical support: $1.27, the 23.6% Fibonacci retracement, and the bear market floor most analysts reference
- Near-term resistance: $1.42, the 61.8% Fibonacci retracement; a confirmed close above this level would signal a structural shift
- Upper resistance zone: $1.78, with approximately 1.85 billion XRP accumulated here, creating a supply ceiling
The Coinbase allegation adds a narrative overhang that technical levels alone can’t price in. XRP’s broader price trajectory has survived worse, but the combination of weak technicals and renewed institutional distrust is a hostile setup. Price action around $1.27 in the coming sessions will be the tell.
Discover: The best crypto to diversify your portfolio with
LiquidChain With Early Mover Upside as XRP Tests Key Levels
XRP’s current ceiling problem, heavy supply at $1.76–$1.80, bearish momentum, and a controversy that won’t quiet down, illustrate a recurring dynamic in crypto: established assets attract scrutiny and structural resistance simultaneously.
LiquidChain ($LIQUID) is a Layer 3 infrastructure project positioning itself as the cross-chain liquidity layer, fusing Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana liquidity into a single execution environment. The architecture includes a Unified Liquidity Layer, Single-Step Execution, Verifiable Settlement, and a Deploy-Once Architecture that lets developers access all three ecosystems without redeployment.
A new layer emerges. Only a few see it first. — LiquidChain (@getliquidchain) March 24, 2026
The future is LiquidChain 
⟁https://t.co/vqvBcdSj94 pic.twitter.com/R7ZeZ0NPGl
The presale is currently priced at $0.0144, with more than $600K raised to date. Early-stage positioning at this price means exposure before any exchange listing dynamics, plus a 1700% APY staking rewards.
Research LiquidChain and review the presale details here.
This article is not financial advice. Crypto assets are volatile. Always conduct your own research before investing.
The post XRP Price Prediction: Coinbase vs. Ripple Allegation Resurfaced appeared first on Cryptonews.
Clutch Towing on What It Takes to Run a 24/7 Service
Ryan Gosling Refused To Shave Legs Or Enter ‘Shave Room’ For Barbie Role
NHL Highlights, March 29
-
NewsBeat5 days agoManchester United reach agreement with Casemiro over contract clause amid transfer speculation
-
News Videos4 days agoParliament publishes latest register of MPs’ financial interests
-
Sports7 days agoGary Kirsten Accuses Pakistan Cricket Board Of ‘Interference’, Mohsin Naqvi Responds
-
Sports7 days agoRemo Stars and Kano Pillars Strengthen Survival Hopes in NPFL
-
NewsBeat3 days agoThe Story hosts event on Durham’s historic registers
-
Business4 days agoInstagram, YouTube Found Responsible for Teen’s Mental Health Struggle in Historic Ruling
-
News Videos7 days agoCh 9 Financial Management Part 1 | Detailed One Shot | Class 12 Business Studies Boards 2026
-
NewsBeat5 days agoTesco is selling new Cadbury Dairy Milk bar and people can’t wait to try it
-
Entertainment7 days agoCynthia Bailey Dishes on ‘RHOA’ Season 17, Discusses Kandi
-
Tech7 days agoSamsung will soon let you control smart home devices from your car’s dashboard
-
Entertainment2 days agoLana Del Rey Celebrates Her Husband’s 51st Birthday In New Post
-
Fashion6 days agoDoes It Matter What You Wear When You’re Laid Off and Looking?
-
NewsBeat7 days agoColombian military plane with 110 soldiers onboard crashes following takeoff
-
Business6 days agoMore women enter wealth management, but few in advisory roles: study
-
Fashion7 days agoFringe Bags for the Season
-
NewsBeat6 days agoEntrepreneurs Forum survey reveals optimism in North East
-
NewsBeat6 days agoNASA Artemis II Astronauts enter 14-Day quarantine as moon rocket reaches launchpad
-
Business6 days agoLate-paying firms face multimillion-pound fines under new crackdown
-
Politics7 days agoHow Media Platforms Balance Performance and Accessibility in Image Delivery
-
Crypto World6 days agoBTC gives up $70,000 level as markets mull higher interest rates
You must be logged in to post a comment Login