Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

Crypto regains $60 billion lost on Trump’s power plant threat

Published

on

Crypto regains $60 billion lost on Trump’s power plant threat

Bitcoin (BTC) has this morning bounced back to over $71,000 after it lost $60 billion in total market capitalization over the weekend following US President Donald Trump’s threat to “obliterate” Iran’s power plants if the country’s military refused to reopen the Strait of Hormuz.

In the 15 minutes following Trump’s threat on Saturday, BTC dropped from $70,100 to $68,200, a $37 billion wipeout for the world’s largest digital asset. Over $240 million in leveraged crypto trades were liquidated within the hour. 

By Sunday evening, total liquidations crossed $1 billion, with long positions accounting for 85% of the damage.

BTC failed to bounce, remaining near $68,200. Total crypto market cap sustained its losses.

Advertisement
Total crypto market capitalization. Crosshairs highlight 7:44pm Truth Social post. Source: TradingView

Trump says war ending ‘very soon,’ then obliterates crypto markets

Less than 24 hours before threatening to blow up power plants, Trump had said the US was “considering winding down” the war.

Indeed, as Trump told ABC News on Saturday that he was planning peace talks with an end to the war “very soon,” BTC made a brief push toward $71,000 on the optimistic rhetoric.

Then, at 7:44pm New York time, Trump published his bearish post. Crypto traders who had positioned themselves with leveraged long positions suffered liquidations within minutes.

Read more: Bitcoin up, Dubai real estate down since Iran war began

Coinglass’ Crypto Fear and Greed Index fell to nine out of 100, deep into “Extreme Fear” territory.

Crypto, one of the only large and relatively liquid markets open during the announcement besides foreign exchange, bore the brunt of the initial losses. Stock exchanges, bond markets, and commodity futures were all closed at the time.

Advertisement

Analysts have already estimated that Bitcoin’s hashrate has dropped roughly 100 EH/s since late February, mostly due to operational disruptions in Iran.

Luxor Technology’s Hashrate Index estimated that Gulf states, including Iran, represent 8-10% of global hashrate. Striking Iran’s power plants would physically knock the country’s remaining BTC miners offline, not to mention accelerating risk-off capital flight away from crypto investments.

As of Sunday evening, BTC was trading at a 23% year-to-date loss. Altcoins like Ethereum and XRP have lost 31% and 26% over the same time period, respectively.

Trump’s-48 hour deadline for a Strait of Hormuz deal expires today, Monday evening at 7:44pm New York time.

Advertisement

Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news, follow us on X, Bluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Crypto-Aligned Super PAC Begins to Endorse Candidates for US Midterms

Published

on

Politics, Funding, Elections, Tether

Fellowship, a super political action committee (PAC) that claims to have $100 million in its war chest from crypto-aligned parties ahead of the 2026 US midterms, has begun reporting spending and endorsements for the next election.

According to a filing with the Federal Election Commission (FEC), the Fellowship PAC reported spending $300,000 on advertising for Clay Fuller, a Republican who won a special election for Georgia’s 14th Congressional District to replace resigning congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene. The spending, reported disbursed on Tuesday, comes about a month before Georgia’s Republican primary on May 19.

Politics, Funding, Elections, Tether
Source: Federal Election Commission

Fellowship is just one of several crypto-backed or aligned PACs expected to pour money to support or oppose candidates in another critical US election season. In 2024, the Fairshake PAC spent more than $130 million in media buys in congressional races, possibly influencing the outcomes in key battlegrounds like the US Senate seat for Ohio.

According to the FEC, super PACs may “receive unlimited contributions from individuals, corporations, labor unions and other PACs for the purpose of financing independent expenditures and other independent political activity.”

In addition to its only reported expenditure since the Fellowship PAC’s statement of organization filed in 2025, Fellowship posted endorsements for candidates to its X account on Thursday, signaling support for Republicans in races across five states. The candidates included Alan Wilson for South Carolina governor, Blake Miguez for Louisiana’s 5th Congressional District, Mike Collins for the US Senate in Georgia, Julia Letlow for the US Senate in Louisiana, Pete Ricketts for the US Senate in Nebraska and Nate Morris for the US Senate in Kentucky.

Advertisement

Related: Chainlink and Anchorage Digital back launch of crypto-aligned PAC

Fellowship announced its launch in September, claiming to have “over $100 million” from undisclosed backers aligned with the crypto industry. On April 1, it said that Tether’s head of government affairs, Jesse Spiro, would chair the PAC, signaling support for candidates with pro-crypto views.

US lawmakers are still stalled on crypto market structure bill as midterms approach

The CLARITY Act, legislation passed by the US House of Representatives in July, has faced several delays in the Senate with no clear path forward on passing the legislation as of Monday.

Reports over the weekend signaled that the Senate Banking Committee, one of the two bodies needed to approve the bill in the chamber before a vote, was planning to hold a markup on the legislation, but the event was not on the committee’s calendar at the time of publication.

Advertisement

The bill, expected to be one of the most comprehensive pieces of legislation affecting the crypto and banking industries, has faced pushback from lawmakers to address ethics, stablecoin yield, tokenized equities and other potential issues.

Magazine: Should users be allowed to bet on war and death in prediction markets?