Connect with us

Crypto World

Did the WBTC DAO approve Justin Sun’s HTX as a merchant?

Published

on

Did the WBTC DAO approve Justin Sun's HTX as a merchant?

Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) spent years marketing itself as being governed by decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) that would have oversight over many parts of the product, including “the addition and removal of merchants and custodians.”

Its whitepaper claimed that “signatures are required from DAO members in order to add/remove members.”

Even as recently as a few months ago, WBTC has continued to emphasize that it “operates through a DAO.”

However, this supposed role of the WBTC DAO hasn’t always been respected.

HTX, formerly Huobi, was added as a merchant, the product’s term for an entity who can initiate mints and burns of WBTC, however, it was not approved by the DAO members listed on the Github, but a different set of signers from a different multisignature wallet.

A review of the smart contract reveals that 0xbE6d2444a717767544a8b0Ba77833AA6519D81cD is one of the merchants returned by the “getMerchants” function.

Advertisement

Read more: Is HTX redeeming 80% of TrueUSD?

This address was listed as HTX on the WBTC dashboard in late 2024 when Protos reported on it being used to redeem approximately half a billion dollars worth of WBTC.

However, this address isn’t listed as one of the merchants on the WBTC DAO GitHub page.

HTX is listed as one of the merchants on the WBTC website.

Advertisement

The entities that are still listed on GitHub include defunct and fraudulent entities such as Alameda Research and Three Arrows Capital, both of which are also still listed on the smart contract.

By further reviewing blockchain transactions on Ethereum, we can identify that this address was added as a merchant in November 2024, approximately two months after BiT Global and Justin Sun got involved in WBTC.

Read more: WBTC relaunches on TRON, but abandoned version is bigger

At the time, this transaction came from 0x4dbbbFb0e68bE9D8F5a377A4654604a62E851e80.

Advertisement

Strangely, this address isn’t listed as one of the multisignature wallets for WBTC on GitHub.

The listed multisignature wallet doesn’t include any transactions for the day when HTX was added as a merchant.

The inclusion of HTX as a merchant becomes increasingly important in light of some of the problematic behaviors that the exchange is engaged in.

Read more: Justin Sun defends HTX while it lends 92% of its USDT on Aave

Advertisement

It appears the publicly disclosed multisignature wallet, 0xB33f8879d4608711cEBb623F293F8Da13B8A37c5, appears to have been quietly replaced with a brand new multisignature wallet.

The wallet that was used lists several owners, many of whom differ from the WBTC DAO Github:

  • 0xFDF28Bf25779ED4cA74e958d54653260af604C20 — Listed as Kyber on the Merchants list on the GitHub, isn’t listed as a DAO member.
  • 0xb0F42D187145911C2aD1755831aDeD125619bd27 — Listed as BitGo on the custodian part of the GitHub, isn’t listed as a DAO member on the current GitHub commit, is listed as a small DAO member on a pull request.
  • 0xd5d4aB76e8F22a0FdCeF8F483cC794a74A1a928e — Not listed on the current GitHub commit, is mentioned in a pull request as Maker.
  • 0xB9062896ec3A615a4e4444DF183F0531a77218AE — Listed as Aave on the Merchants list on the GitHub, is not listed as a DAO member on the current commit, and is mentioned as a small DAO member on a pull request.
  • 0xddD5105b94A647eEa6776B5A63e37D81eAE3566F — Not listed on the current GitHub commit, is listed on a pull request as Tom Bean and is listed as a small DAO member there, multisignature wallet that includes:
    • 0x97788A242B6A9B1C4Cb103e8947df03801829BE4 — Not listed on the GitHub at all.
    • 0x59150a3d034B435327C1A95A116C80F3bE2e4B5E — Not listed on the GitHub at all.
  • 0x926314B7c2d36871eaf60Afa3D7E8ffc0f4F9A80 — Not listed on the current GitHub commit, appears to be a multisignature wallet created using BitGo’s technology, and is listed as BitGo 2 on a pull request describing it as a member of the small DAO.
  • 0x51c44979eA04256f678552BE65FAf67f808b3EC0 — Not listed on the current GitHub commit, appears to be another multisignature wallet created using BitGo’s technology, is listed as BitGo 3 on a pull request describing it as a member of the small DAO.
  • 0x0940c5bcAAe6e9Fbd22e869c2a3cD7A21604ED8D — Not listed on the GitHub at all.
  • 0x5DCb2Cc68F4b975E1E2b77E723126a9f560F08E8 — Not listed on the GitHub at all.

It is not clear why these changes aren’t reflected on the current version of the GitHub repository. Protos reached out to WBTC for some clarification, but it didn’t respond before publication.

By further reviewing the smart contract at 0x4dbbbFb0e68bE9D8F5a377A4654604a62E851e80, we can identify the five addresses that approved the listing of HTX:

  • 0xFDF28Bf25779ED4cA74e958d54653260af604C20 — Kyber
  • 0xb0F42D187145911C2aD1755831aDeD125619bd27 — BitGo
  • 0xddD5105b94A647eEa6776B5A63e37D81eAE3566F — Tom Bean
  • 0x926314B7c2d36871eaf60Afa3D7E8ffc0f4F9A80 — BitGo
  • 0x51c44979eA04256f678552BE65FAf67f808b3EC0 — BitGo

This means that although this multisignature wallet requires five signatures, three of them came from the same entity.

Only two non-custodian entities approved the addition of HTX as a merchant and those aren’t currently listed as DAO members on GitHub.

Advertisement

Adding to the intrigue, Tom Bean’s project, bZx, was built on Kyber.

It’s also worth highlighting the fact that this multisignature wallet requires five signatures, BitGo controls three, and there are two addresses that aren’t listed at all on GitHub.

If those are controlled by BitGo or BiT Global, then it would be possible for the custodians to make changes without approval from a single additional WBTC DAO member.

Protos reached out to WBTC to determine the identity of those two addresses, but again, didn’t get a response before publication.

Advertisement

BiT Global was added without WBTC DAO approval

This isn’t the first time that WBTC has appeared to ignore the advertised role of its DAO.

The whitepaper for WBTC claimed that “addition/removal of custodians” would be controlled by this DAO.

This used to be echoed on the website, which claimed, “The addition and removal of merchants and custodians will be an open process controlled by a multi-signature contract.”

Read more: Coinbase to delist WBTC months after Justin Sun controversy

Advertisement

Mike Belshe, the chief executive of BitGo, also claimed when BiT Global was being installed that there was a large DAO that “owns the smart contract” and “picks, you know, how we do custody of this thing.”

Strangely, despite that claim, the WBTC DAO didn’t seem to be consulted on the addition of Sun-affiliated BiT Global as a custodian for WBTC.

The Github for the WBTC DAO still doesn’t list BiT Global as a custodian.

The website for WBTC does list BiT Global as one of the custodians, alongside BitGo and BitGo Singapore.

Advertisement

The “members” smart contract still only lists a single custodian, 0xb0F42D187145911C2aD1755831aDeD125619bd27, a BitGo address.

This address is a multi-signature, so it’s possible that BiT Global was added as a signer to this wallet, meaning that the smart contract did not need to be updated with a new custodian address.

Broadly, despite the fact that WBTC manages over $8 billion in value, it seems to have neglected and ignored the DAO that has frequently been an important part of its marketing.

It’s replaced the multisignature wallet that governs it, without updates, with members whose identity we do not know.

Advertisement

This replacement made it possible, or convenient, for HTX to be added as a merchant, but other problems have been ignored, such as the fact that both Alameda Research and Three Arrows Capital are included as merchants.

The large DAO was apparently bypassed regarding the addition of BiT Global.

However it is that WBTC operates, it’s not principally through its DAO.

Its claims of transparency and decentralization have been dashed against the difficulty of coordinating a variety of actors around the world.

Advertisement

Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news and investigations, follow us on XBluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crypto World

XRP Funding Rates on Binance Turn Deeply Negative, Buy Signal?

Published

on

What This Means for Traders


Analysts say past periods of deeply negative funding rates on Binance have often been followed by corrective rallies.

XRP funding rates on Binance turned negative this week, hitting levels that have historically preceded short-term price rebounds.

The setup suggests crowded short positioning may have created conditions for a corrective rally, though analysts caution this does not guarantee a lasting trend reversal without a broader market catalyst.

Advertisement

Derivatives Data Flashes Contrarian Signal

Data from Binance shows XRP funding rates entered a phase of extreme negativity, while the asset ranged between $1.35 and $1.50, according to CryptoQuant analyst Darkfost. This comes after the Ripple token experienced a 60% correction from its July 2025 all-time high of $3.65, with most derivatives traders positioning on the short side despite the sustained drop.

Historical data suggests that short-term rebounds or corrective rallies in XRP often follow periods of extreme negative funding rates on Binance. The analyst emphasized that such configurations act as contrarian indicators, suggesting bearish positioning may have become overcrowded relative to actual price action.

“When market consensus becomes excessively aligned in one direction, history shows that markets tend to surprise the majority,” Darkfost wrote.

Even though the configuration does not ensure long-term trend reversals, the on-chain observer pointed out that it was a favorable indicator for investors trying to find appealing entry points or looking to progressively increase their exposure to XRP.

Exchange Outflows Suggest Supply Tightening

On the technical side, analyst EGRAG CRYPTO yesterday identified $1.55 as the first critical trigger level for XRP, with a weekly close above this point weakening the current downward trajectory.

Advertisement

A more decisive breakout above $2.20 would invalidate the bearish descending channel structure that has defined the asset’s price action for months and open the path toward $2.70 to $3.60. At present, XRP is trading around $1.44, up about 3% in 24 hours but down nearly 10% over the past month and more than 60% below its all-time high.

You may also like:

Adding to the dynamics, exchange outflow data shows a significant increase in XRP withdrawals during February, with total outflows reaching approximately 7.03 billion XRP, the highest level since November 2025.

Binance led the withdrawal volume with outflows of 3.38 billion XRP, indicating a shift in assets from trading environments to private wallets or long-term storage. When withdrawals increase in this manner, it often indicates that a portion of the available supply is being removed from the spot market, potentially reducing liquidity on trading platforms.

With that in mind, traders will likely be focused on whether the combination of negative funding rates and large exchange withdrawals will translate into buying pressure. As Darkfost put it,

Advertisement

“In such uncertain conditions, it becomes essential to carefully select positions, relying on market signals that are beginning to emerge.”

SPECIAL OFFER (Exclusive)

Binance Free $600 (CryptoPotato Exclusive): Use this link to register a new account and receive $600 exclusive welcome offer on Binance (full details).

LIMITED OFFER for CryptoPotato readers at Bybit: Use this link to register and open a $500 FREE position on any coin!

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

KuCoin launches KCS PulseDrop to turn trading and payments into rewards

Published

on

KuCoin launches KCS PulseDrop, turning trading, staking, and payments into rewards to expand the utility of its native token.
KuCoin launches KCS PulseDrop, turning trading, staking, and payments into rewards to expand the utility of its native token.
  • KuCoin launches KCS PulseDrop to expand the utility of its native token.
  • Users earn points from trading, staking, and payments on the platform.
  • Initiative aims to embed KCS deeper into KuCoin’s ecosystem utility.

Global crypto exchange KuCoin has launched a new rewards initiative called KCS PulseDrop, marking a strategic step toward expanding the utility of its native token, KuCoin Token (KCS).

The program connects everyday user activity, from trading to payments with a transparent points and rewards system, effectively turning KCS into a more active, multi-dimensional part of the KuCoin ecosystem.

The exchange said PulseDrop is designed to shift KCS “from a passive holding asset” into an engagement-based tool that bridges trading, staking, and real-world cryptocurrency use.

Participating users earn points through actions like futures or spot trading, staking KCS, or making payments with KuCard, P2P, or KuCoin Pay.

Points accumulate over time and determine each user’s share of reward distributions.

Advertisement

In essence, PulseDrop transforms interaction into measurable participation.

KuCoin described the framework as a “participation economy,” one that rewards sustained activity rather than short-term speculation, an idea gaining traction among digital asset platforms seeking to retain users and build long-term loyalty.

By aligning engagement with tangible outcomes, the company hopes to position KCS as a functional utility token underpinning a wider user ecosystem, rather than merely a token conferring fee discounts or passive yield.

Expanding KCS beyond exchange use

The PulseDrop system introduces tiered point mechanics and multipliers that let users accelerate accrual through specific behaviors, such as trading particular project tokens or KCS itself.

Advertisement

Transactions made through fiat and payments channels also contribute to a “Payment Task” score, rewarding real-world crypto usage, a move that ties KuCoin’s growing payments infrastructure more tightly to its core token.

The exchange said the design is meant to balance simplicity and transparency while giving users early exposure to promising projects listed on its platform.

KuCoin positions PulseDrop as both a community engagement tool and a means of democratizing access to project rewards by basing allocations on participation rather than holding size alone.

Analysts view the initiative as part of a wider industry shift, where exchanges seek to extend the relevance of their native tokens beyond transactional perks.

Advertisement

As competition among global exchanges intensifies, platforms like KuCoin, Binance, and OKX are experimenting with loyalty or activity frameworks that embed token value deeper into users’ daily interactions.

KuCoin, which serves over 40 million users across 200 countries, has been steadily expanding its regulated footprint under CEO BC Wong, with recent licensing milestones in Austria (under MiCA) and Australia.

The exchange, recognized by Forbes and Hurun for its innovation and security standards, maintains SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001:2022 certifications.

By knitting together engagement, rewards, and payments, KCS PulseDrop reflects KuCoin’s broader ambition to create an integrated and participatory digital-asset ecosystem, where token holders play an active, sustained role in shaping its growth trajectory.

Advertisement

The PulseDrop platform is now live on KuCoin’s official website: www.kucoin.com/pulsedrop.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

FBI Arrests Custody Company CEO‘s Son over Alleged $46M Crypto Theft

Published

on

FBI, Cryptocurrencies, United States, Crimes

The US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) announced that it had made an arrest related to the theft of more than $46 million in cryptocurrency from the US Marshals Service.

In a Thursday X post, FBI Director Kash Patel said that the bureau had arrested John Daghita, the son of Command Services & Support (CMDSS) president Dean Daghita, after he allegedly gained unauthorized access to wallets managed under the federal asset protection program. Patel said the arrest was carried out by the “French Gendarmerie’s premier elite tactical unit” with the FBI on the island of Saint Martin in the Caribbean.

FBI, Cryptocurrencies, United States, Crimes
Source: Kash Patel

Patel’s social media post with a photo of a handcuffed Daghita, also included a photo of a suitcase containing cash, several thumb drives, a phone and three devices resembling Trezor hardware wallets. The FBI director did not disclose whether any of the stolen funds had been recovered.

The alleged crypto theft was reported in January by online sleuth ZachXBT, who said that he had traced a wallet linked to Daghita holding about $23 million in digital assets connected to $90 million reportedly seized by the US government in 2024 and 2025. Daghita’s father heads CMDSS, which was awarded a contract by the US Marshals Service in 2024 related to the custody of the seized crypto.

Related: Wallet linked to alleged US seizure theft launches memecoin, crashes 97%

Advertisement

The US Marshals Service confirmed that it was investigating the matter at the time. Patrick Witt, the director of the White House Crypto Council, said in a Jan. 26 X post that he was “on it,” referencing ZachXBT’s claims. Witt had not publicly commented on the arrest as of Thursday.

According to data from BitcoinTreasuries.NET, US authorities, including the Marshals Service, may hold as much as 328,372 Bitcoin (BTC) through various seizures.

South Korean authorities make two arrests related to seized crypto

Daghita’s arrest is the latest example of global law enforcement efforts to recover previously seized assets.

In February, police in South Korea arrested two people allegedly connected to a case in which authorities lost access to 22 BTC, worth about $1.6 million at the time of publication.

Advertisement

The crypto was reportedly stolen after police seized the assets from a hack on a South Korean exchange in 2021, storing them on a cold wallet owned by a third party.

Earlier this week, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Strategy and Finance Koo Yun-cheol said the government and relevant agencies will “conduct an inspection of the current status and management practices of digital assets held and managed by the government and public institutions,” according to local media reports.

Magazine: Bitcoin may face hard fork over any attempt to freeze Satoshi’s coins

Advertisement