Crypto exchange pushed back on $1.7 billion Iran-linked flow allegations and called media reports behind the probe “defamatory.”
Mar 6, 2026, 3:01 p.m.
Crypto World
Dubai regulator issues alert over KuCoin-linked entities advertising crypto services
Dubai’s virtual assets regulator has issued a public warning about several companies linked to the crypto exchange KuCoin, alleging they may have been promoting or providing services to residents without the required authorization.
Summary
- Dubai’s VARA issued an alert naming Phoenixfin Pte Ltd, MEK Global Limited, Peken Global Limited, and KuCoin Exchange EU GmbH for allegedly advertising crypto services under the KuCoin brand without proper authorization.
- VARA said the entities must stop all unlicensed virtual asset activities in or from Dubai, noting they do not hold a license to offer regulated crypto services in the jurisdiction.
- The regulator cautioned that engaging with unlicensed platforms could expose users to financial and legal risks, urging investors to verify whether firms are listed on VARA’s official registry before using their services.
Dubai watchdog flags KuCoin-linked companies for unlicensed crypto activity
In a regulatory notice dated March 5, the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA) named Phoenixfin Pte Ltd, MEK Global Limited, Peken Global Limited, and KuCoin Exchange EU GmbH, which it said are commercially advertising services under the KuCoin brand.
According to the regulator, the entities may have been offering virtual asset services to users in Dubai “without the necessary regulatory approvals” and may have misrepresented their licensing status in the jurisdiction.
As a result, VARA has instructed the companies to “cease and desist all unlicensed VA activities” in or from Dubai.
The authority emphasized that the exchange does not hold a license to provide virtual asset services in or from Dubai, meaning any such activities would be in breach of local regulations governing crypto service providers.
Under Dubai Law No. (4) of 2022 and Cabinet Resolution No. 111/2022, all virtual asset service providers must obtain regulatory approval from VARA before offering services in the emirate.
VARA also warned that interacting with unlicensed platforms could expose investors to “significant financial risks and potential legal consequences”, urging residents to verify whether companies are listed on the regulator’s public register before engaging with them.
The regulator further noted that any promotion, advertising, or solicitation related to KuCoin has not been approved, meaning the platform is not permitted to market or promote virtual asset products or services in Dubai.
Founded in 2017, KuCoin is a Seychelles-based cryptocurrency exchange that offers spot, derivatives and margin trading to users worldwide.
The alert is part of VARA’s broader effort to enforce its crypto regulatory framework and prevent unlicensed operators from targeting investors in the emirate.
Continue Reading
TLDR
- Western Alliance (WAL) dropped approximately 12% in premarket hours following disclosure of a $126.4M loan charge-off
- Jefferies Financial (JEF) has been hit with a lawsuit alleging fraud and breach of contract for walking away from payment commitments
- The troubled loans involved First Brands Group, an automotive parts distributor that entered bankruptcy proceedings in September
- Shares of Jefferies (JEF) declined 5-6.6% as the firm dismissed the legal claims as baseless
- Bank management indicates security sales and cost reductions could mitigate approximately $100M of the total $126.4M impact
Western Alliance Bancorporation disclosed a significant $126.4 million charge-off on Friday following notification from Jefferies Financial Group that it would cease making payments required under an existing forbearance arrangement. The announcement triggered a steep premarket decline of approximately 12% in WAL shares.
Western Alliance Bancorporation, WAL
The substantial write-down stems from a commercial financing facility backed by receivables from First Brands Group, an automotive components distributor that sought bankruptcy protection in September 2025 after accumulating $11.6 billion in outstanding obligations.
On Friday, Western Alliance initiated legal proceedings in New York Supreme Court naming Jefferies, its Leucadia Asset Management (LAM) division, and related corporate entities as defendants. The complaint centers on allegations of contractual violations and fraudulent conduct.
The origins of this dispute date to October 2025, when Western Alliance negotiated a forbearance arrangement after uncovering that LAM’s servicing agent had permitted UCC financing statements protecting the receivables collateral to expire — a critical oversight that constituted a default event.
The forbearance terms required Jefferies to execute complete loan repayment no later than March 31, 2026. Western Alliance’s most recent payment receipt was $42.125 million delivered on January 15, 2026.
Then the relationship collapsed. Jefferies recently notified Western Alliance that the final two principal installments scheduled for Q1 2026, representing $126.4 million, would not be forthcoming.
Jefferies issued a forceful rebuttal. “We believe that the lawsuit is without merit and it will be defended vigorously,” the company declared in a Friday statement. JEF shares retreated between 5% and 6.6% during trading.
The First Brands situation continues to deteriorate. Brian Finneran, a managing director at Truist Securities, characterized the evolving story as “just getting so much worse” while questioning “whether everyone will have another round of losses.”
Western Alliance’s Strategy to Absorb the Loss
Chief Executive Kenneth Vecchione of Western Alliance detailed a mitigation strategy for the financial impact. The institution intends to generate $50 million through strategic securities portfolio sales — approximately $45 million of which has been captured within the current quarter — while implementing $50 million in operational expense reductions.
These combined measures address $100 million of the shortfall. The outstanding $26 million deficit remains unresolved, though Vecchione indicated the bank is “evaluating other pathways” to close the gap.
J.P. Morgan analyst Anthony Elian emphasized the importance of ensuring Western Alliance’s earnings performance after Q1 experiences “very minimal impact” from this charge-off event.
Financial Strength Metrics
Notwithstanding the charge-off, Western Alliance maintains its CET1 ratio would fall merely 7 basis points from the year-end 2025 measurement of 11.0%. Management continues to forecast Q1 profitability with stable capital levels.
As of March 5, 2026, the institution reported that 75% of aggregate deposits carry insurance or collateralization, $21.5 billion in unencumbered premium liquid assets, and $20 billion in available off-balance sheet funding capacity.
Western Alliance emphasized it remains on track to deliver profitable quarterly results notwithstanding the financial setback.
Crypto World
Crypto exchange Binance tells U.S. Senate probe no accounts sent crypto directly to Iran
Crypto World
The Cooper Companies (COO) Stock: Shares Decline Despite Impressive Q1 Earnings Beat and Raised Guidance
Key Highlights
- First-quarter revenue reached $1.024B, up 6.2%, while COO stock dropped 2.17%.
- Earnings per share (non-GAAP) surged 20% to $1.10; annual outlook improved.
- CooperVision segment expanded 7.6% on strength in MyDay and MiSight products.
- Asia-Pacific region saw 4% sales drop due to legacy hydrogel challenges.
- CooperSurgical posted 3.3% revenue growth; company generated $159M free cash flow.
Shares of The Cooper Companies, Inc. (COO) experienced downward pressure despite delivering robust fiscal first-quarter results and demonstrating significant earnings momentum. The stock finished at $80.20, down 2.17%, before extending losses to $75.23 in pre-market activity. This market reaction came even as the medical device manufacturer reported enhanced revenue, improved profit margins, and upgraded earnings projections.
The Cooper Companies, Inc., COO
Quarterly results demonstrate robust revenue momentum and profitability gains
The company posted consolidated revenue totaling $1.024 billion for the first fiscal quarter. This represents a 6.2% year-over-year increase from the comparable period. On an organic basis, revenue climbed 2.9%, indicating consistent underlying demand across core business lines.
Profitability metrics showed meaningful improvement as operational discipline and restructuring initiatives delivered benefits. The non-GAAP gross margin came in at 68.1%, while the operating margin expanded to 26.9%. Operating expenses as a percentage of total revenue decreased versus the prior-year quarter.
Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share climbed 20% year over year to reach $1.10 for the period. The share count averaged approximately 197 million during the quarter. Management responded by elevating full-year non-GAAP EPS guidance to a range of $4.58 to $4.66.
Vision care segment benefits from innovative contact lens products
CooperVision generated $695 million in revenue during the quarter, representing 7.6% growth compared to the year-ago period. The division’s organic revenue advanced 3.3%, supported by consistent worldwide demand for contact lens solutions. Innovation initiatives and geographic market penetration drove segment results.
The MyDay premium contact lens portfolio gained traction with stronger uptake across multiple international territories. Meanwhile, MiSight lenses extended their presence in the myopia management category. MiSight product revenue climbed 23% versus last year to total $28 million.
The Asia-Pacific territory presented challenges, with revenue declining 4% during the reporting period. Weakness in traditional hydrogel offerings in the Japanese market primarily accounted for the regional shortfall. Company leadership anticipates continued softness in the current quarter before growth resumes in the third fiscal quarter.
Surgical division demonstrates improving trends and robust cash performance
CooperSurgical recorded quarterly revenue of $329 million, achieving 3.3% year-over-year expansion. On an organic basis, the division grew 2.2%, signaling consistent advancement across its medical device offerings. Fertility-related products displayed early indicators of demand recovery.
The fertility business generated $127 million in quarterly revenue, advancing 3% organically. Improved procedure volumes and stable product demand contributed to segment performance. These results reflect gradual healing in the reproductive health marketplace.
The company produced $159 million in free cash flow during the three-month period. Share repurchase activity totaled 1.1 million shares for $92 million, while management refinanced $950 million in term debt, extending maturity to February 2031. Net debt decreased to approximately $2.4 billion as the balance sheet strengthened.
Leadership remains committed to expanding market position, enhancing operational performance, and maintaining disciplined capital deployment strategies. These priorities underpin sustainable growth prospects across both business segments. Nevertheless, investor sentiment turned negative following the earnings announcement, with shares extending declines into the following trading session.
The crypto market remained on edge today, March 6, as the war in Iran continued. It also wavered as the US non-farm payrolls and retail sales dropped and the unemployment rate jumped.
Summary
- The crypto market wavered after the latest US non-farm payrolls data.
- A report showed that the US shed 92,000 jobs in February.
- US retail sales continued falling in January.
Bitcoin (BTC) price remained at $70,000 at press time. Ethereum (ETH) hovered slightly above $2,000, while Ripple (XRP) remained steady above $1.40.
Crypto prices reacted to the latest jobs report, which was much worse than expected. The US economy shed over 92,000 jobs in February, the worst performance in years. Economists were expecting the report to show that the economy added 59,000 jobs.
The unemployment rate rose from 4.3% in January to 4.4% in February. Additionally, the participation rate dropped to 62%, while the average hourly earnings rose 0.4%.
These numbers show that the labor market is getting worse, a trend that may continue after several layoffs. For example, Amazon announced that it was cutting more jobs in its robotics arm this week. It has slashed 57,000 jobs in the last three years. Other companies like Target and UPS have slashed jobs recently.
More data revealed that the US retail sales dropped by 0.2% in January. That is a notable figure as consumer spending is the biggest part of the US economy.
Therefore, in theory, these numbers are bullish for the crypto market as they may lead to a Federal Reserve intervention. In a recent statement, Stephen Miran, a senior Fed official, said that he supported more interest rate cuts, citing the labor market.
The main challenge for the Fed is that inflation may worsen as the war in Iran continues. Crude oil prices continued rising, with Brent moving to $90 and the West Texas Intermediate moving to $87. Gasoline jumped to the highest point since 2024, meaning that inflation may rebound soon.
Data on Polymarket shows that traders anticipate one or two interest rate cuts this year. In most cases, Bitcoin and the crypto market does well when the Fed is signaling that it will cut rates.
Recent events at the US Federal Reserve signal acceptance of digital assets at the highest levels of the country’s monetary system.
Kraken recently became the first crypto exchange to receive a master account at the Federal Reserve.
The Fed could also see a new crypto-friendly chair. US President Donald Trump on Wednesday submitted a pro-Bitcoin candidate for the Senate’s consideration.
These developments represent a significant shift in how the Fed could treat the crypto industry. But there are also detractors.
Why are Fed master accounts so important to the crypto industry?
On Wednesday, Kraken announced that its Wyoming-chartered bank, Kraken Financial, had been awarded a Fed master account. This made it “the first digital asset bank in US history to gain direct access to the Federal Reserve’s payment infrastructure.”
Kraken co-CEO Arjun Sethi said, “With a Federal Reserve master account, we can operate not as a peripheral participant in the US banking system, but as a directly connected financial institution.”
The master account represents access to the most coveted form of money for financial institutions: dollars held directly within the Federal Reserve system.
Related: US Bitcoin reserve still has no plan to stack sats
These dollars are widely perceived as risk-free. Aaron Brogan of Brogan Law, a firm specializing in digital assets, said they “are the intrinsic architecture of the United States monetary system, which can always just make more of them.”
Since United States dollars remain the preeminent global currency, the best form of USD is the best there is. Other instruments like cash, dollars in FDIC-insured bank accounts and T-Bills are pretty good, but Fed dollars are the best.”
For an exchange like Kraken, “it improves reliability and efficiency for moving fiat deposits in and out of digital-asset markets,” according to Sethi.
But not every financial institution is granted access, and certainly not the upstart disruptors of the cryptocurrency industry, at least not until now.
What are Federal Reserve master accounts?
The Federal Reserve System is split into 12 different banks. While these banks come together for important policy decisions, each has a certain degree of autonomy.
In an effort to bring the Fed system a bit closer together, Congress passed the Monetary Control Act of 1980. The law gave all depository institutions access to Federal Reserve accounts. This was the beginning of the master account.
Julie Andersen Hill, the dean of the University of Wyoming’s College of Law, wrote that Congress “intended that all depository institutions would be able to use the Federal Reserve’s payment systems. The legislative history of the Monetary Control Act is littered with references to ‘open access’ to ‘all depository institutions.’”
However, as the banking industry changed, the Fed began to express preferences over who got access and how much. Per Brogan, three tiers developed:
-
Tier 1: Federally chartered banks with deposit insurance
-
Tier 2: Federally chartered banks without deposit insurance
-
Tier 3: State-chartered banks
“Perhaps unsurprisingly, the Federal Reserve Board thinks banks in Tier 1 should get master account access, while Tier 3 banks are subject to heightened scrutiny, and Tier 2 somewhere in the middle,” he wrote.
The crypto industry has long had a problem with finding banks willing to serve them. Those that would were often state-chartered banks, which already had trouble accessing the federal system.
Related: Banks can’t seem to service crypto, even as it goes mainstream
The Fed doesn’t want to be too exclusive with master accounts. According to Thomas Kingsley, director of financial services policy at the American Action Forum, “During periods of stress, access to central bank settlement accounts can materially affect a firm’s ability to meet redemption demands. In that sense, master account access can reduce run risk relative to structures reliant on commercial bank deposits.”
However, the Fed also doesn’t want to give out access to just any institution. Per Kingsley, “If a large nonbank with a master account were to experience operational failure or disorderly unwinding, the disruption would occur closer to core financial infrastructure.”
Enter the skinny account. In October 2025, Fed Governor Christopher J. Waller proposed a new type of account that would provide access to Fed payment rails, but also control for certain risks, while carrying restrictions. These are:
This is what Kraken got. It may be limited, comparably, but it is still a major victory for the institutionalization of crypto. Pro-crypto Senator Cynthia Lummis called it a “watershed milestone in the history of digital assets.”
Bank groups push back on account
Not everyone’s happy about it. Independent Community Bankers of America (ICBA) CEO Rebeca Romero Rainey wrote, “Granting nonbank entities and crypto institutions access to master accounts poses risks to the banking system.”
She said that there are “significant risks to expanding direct Fed account access to institutions that operate outside the traditional banking regulatory framework.”
The Banking Policy Institute’s co-head of regulatory affairs, Paige Pidano Paridon, said the BPI was “deeply concerned” that the Fed approved the “‘limited purpose’ master account—which appears to be a ‘skinny’ account—before the Federal Reserve Board has finalized its policy framework for those accounts.”
She said that the decision ignored public comment the Fed sought on skinny accounts and was made “with no transparency into the process for approval or the risk mitigants that have been imposed to address the very significant risks it raises.”
A pro-crypto banker could soon lead the Fed
In addition to the US central bank giving accounts to crypto exchanges, the bank itself could soon be led by a pro-crypto economist. On Wednesday, Trump sent the nomination of Kevin Warsh, a Shepard Family Distinguished Visiting Fellow in Economics at the Hoover Institution of Stanford University, to the Senate.
The White House is seeking to make Warsh chair for four years and a governor on the Fed board for 14 years.
Warsh, who served as a Fed governor under former US Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama from 2006 to 2011, has made some pro-crypto remarks in the recent past.
“Bitcoin does not make me nervous,” he said in a May 2025 interview. He said that billionaire investor Marc Andreessen, “showed me the white paper […] I wish I had understood as clearly as he did how transformative Bitcoin and this new technology would be. Bitcoin doesn’t trouble me. I think of it as an important asset that can help inform policymakers when they’re doing things right and wrong.”
Warsh’s nomination may not be smooth sailing. Democratic lawmakers and central banking policy experts alike have expressed concerns about the Trump administration’s continued efforts to exert control over the Fed.
Trump has wanted interest rate cuts for months, but the Fed, currently chaired by Jerome Powell, has not complied with his wishes.
In January, Trump’s Department of Justice served the Federal Reserve with grand jury subpoenas and threatened Powell with a criminal indictment over alleged misuse of funds to build an office building. Powell claimed that the real argument was over the Fed’s unwillingness to follow orders from the White House.
The US central bank is increasingly accepting cryptocurrency, a trend that is likely to continue with new, more favorable policies and pro-crypto leadership.
Magazine: What’s a ‘Network State’ and are there real-life examples? Big Questions
Cointelegraph Features publishes long-form journalism, analysis, and narrative reporting produced by Cointelegraph’s in-house editorial team with subject-matter expertise. All articles are edited and reviewed by Cointelegraph editors in line with our editorial standards. Research or perspective in this article does not reflect the views of Cointelegraph as a company unless explicitly stated. Content published in Features does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Readers should conduct their own research and consult qualified professionals where appropriate. Cointelegraph maintains full editorial independence. The selection, commissioning, and publication of Features and Magazine content are not influenced by advertisers, partners, or commercial relationships. This content is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy.
XRP price is holding near a critical support level as exchange reserves fall sharply, a development that could tighten available supply in the market.
Summary
- XRP trades near $1.38 while defending the $1.30 support zone after a month-long decline.
- Binance XRP reserves dropped from over $10B in 2025 to about $3.9B, reducing potential selling supply.
- Technical indicators show consolidation, with $1.42 acting as the key level for a possible recovery.
XRP (XRP) was trading at $1.38 at press time, down 3.1% over the past 24 hours. The token moved within a weekly range of $1.28 to $1.46 and has lost about 17% over the past month.
It now sits more than 60% below its July 2025 all-time high of $3.65. Market activity has also cooled.
Trading volume dropped to $2.28 billion in the last 24 hours, down 38% from the previous day. Data from CoinGlass shows derivatives volume fell 26% to $3.58 billion, while open interest slipped 2.69% to $2.33 billion, showing that some traders are closing or reducing positions.
Exchange reserves drop sharply
An March 6 analysis by CryptoQuant contributor Amr Taha reveals that the amount of XRP held on Binance has dropped sharply in recent months.
Exchange reserve data measures the total value of a particular asset sitting on a trading platform. For XRP on Binance, the metric reflects the dollar value of all tokens stored on the exchange.
That number changes depending on two things: how many coins users keep on the platform and the current market price of XRP.
The latest figures show that XRP reserves on Binance are now worth around $3.9 billion as of March 6. Not long ago, the value was much higher. In both January and July 2025, reserves briefly climbed above $10 billion before starting their current decline.
Large token balances on exchanges are often viewed as a sign that selling pressure could increase. When large amounts of a token sit on an exchange, traders can easily sell them, which may increase potential selling pressure.
When those balances decline, it often means investors are moving their holdings to private wallets, reducing the supply available for trading. (f demand stays steady while fewer tokens remain on exchanges, the tighter supply can help support prices and may even create upward pressure for XRP.
XRP price technical analysis
From a chart perspective, XRP may be finding its footing after a long stretch of downward movement.
The area between $1.30 and $1.32 has started to act as a key short-term support level. At one point the price slipped below $1.30, but the drop didn’t last long. Buyers quickly stepped in, and several daily candles managed to close back above that range.
That kind of reaction usually signals that traders are defending the level. Even so, XRP hasn’t yet regained the middle line of the Bollinger Bands, which lines up with the 20-day moving average around $1.40 to $1.42.
As long as the price remains under that mark, short-term momentum still leans slightly bearish. Volatility has also begun to ease. After February’s sharp decline, the Bollinger Bands have narrowed considerably.
This kind of tightening often appears when the market is moving sideways. Historically, these periods of compression tend to come before a larger move once volatility returns.
Momentum indicators are beginning to show modest improvement. The relative strength index, which previously fell to deeply oversold levels near 25, has rebounded to around 44. A move above the neutral 50 mark would signal strengthening bullish momentum.
Even so, the broader trend remains unchanged. Since the peak reached in January, XRP has continued to form lower highs, a classic sign that the downtrend is still technically in place. A decisive break above the $1.50 to $1.60 resistance area would be needed to shift that structure.
The $1.30 support is still the crucial level to keep an eye on for the time being. XRP may attempt a reversal toward $1.50 or even $1.60 if buyers are able to hold it and push the price back above the $1.42 mid-band. However, the next downward targets might show up at $1.20 or even $1.10 if the support gives way.
Ethereum is attempting to extend its rebound from the February lows, but the broader structure still reflects a market in recovery mode rather than a confirmed trend reversal. The next sessions should clarify whether this bounce can turn into a sustained move, or if it remains a corrective rally inside a larger downtrend.
Ethereum Price Analysis: The Daily Chart
On the daily chart, ETH remains within a descending channel and continues to trade below the major moving averages, with both the 100-day MA and the 200-day MA still acting as overhead pressure. This keeps the higher-time-frame bias cautious, as rallies into these dynamic resistance areas often attract supply unless price can reclaim them decisively.
From a level perspective, the first meaningful resistance sits around the $2,350 to $2,450 region, which aligns with prior structure and a visible supply area. A clean daily reclaim and hold above that zone would improve the outlook and put the $2,800 to $3,000 region back in play. On the downside, the $1,800 area remains the key demand zone that previously absorbed heavy selling. Losing it on a daily basis would expose the next lower band around $1,500.
ETH/USDT 4-Hour Chart
The 4-hour chart shows ETH stabilizing after the sharp sell-off, but the price action is still capped by nearby resistance, with $2,150 standing out as the immediate pivot. Recent attempts at that level have been met with rejection, suggesting sellers remain active overhead and that buyers still need stronger follow-through to flip the short-term structure.
If ETH can reclaim the $2,150 level and then hold above it, the next upside path would likely target the $2,300-2,400 area first, as the resistance zone from the daily chart.
If the rejection continues, however, or the price fails to recover after the recent fake breakout, the focus shifts back to the $1,800 region as a short-term support, and then to the $1,600-$1,500 demand area. A break below that demand zone would materially weaken the consolidation setup and raise the odds of a much deeper continuation lower.
Sentiment Analysis
Funding rates have turned mildly positive again, indicating leverage is slowly rebuilding on the long side after the capitulation phase. This is a constructive sign if it comes alongside steady price appreciation, since a balanced funding environment often supports healthier continuation rather than fragile, overlevered pumps.
That said, the market is still vulnerable around key resistance. If ETH remains capped below $2,150 while funding stays positive, the risk of long positioning becoming crowded increases, which can lead to sharp downside wicks and forced de-risk events. The cleaner bullish scenario is a sustained push above resistance with funding staying controlled, rather than spiking higher, as that would signal demand is driving the move instead of leverage chasing it.
Binance Free $600 (CryptoPotato Exclusive): Use this link to register a new account and receive $600 exclusive welcome offer on Binance (full details).
LIMITED OFFER for CryptoPotato readers at Bybit: Use this link to register and open a $500 FREE position on any coin!
Disclaimer: Information found on CryptoPotato is those of writers quoted. It does not represent the opinions of CryptoPotato on whether to buy, sell, or hold any investments. You are advised to conduct your own research before making any investment decisions. Use provided information at your own risk. See Disclaimer for more information.
CoinDesk Indices presents its daily market update, highlighting the performance of leaders and laggards in the CoinDesk 20 Index.
The CoinDesk 20 is currently trading at 1991.98, down 2.1% (-41.93) since 4 p.m. ET on Thursday.
None of the 20 assets are trading higher.
Leaders: ICP (-0.2%) and APT (-0.4%).
Laggards: AAVE (-4.3%) and SOL (-3.1%).
The CoinDesk 20 is a broad-based index traded on multiple platforms in several regions globally.
Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) cooled after marching toward a fresh high near $74,000 earlier in the week, setting up a critical debate among traders about whether the rally marks a local top or the next leg in a larger bullish sequence. The pullback comes as market participants weigh whether the current move mirrors patterns from prior cycles and what it portends for the path ahead. Notably, the market had already surged to a roughly $126,000 peak in October 2025, a reminder that outsized booms can be followed by sharp corrections. As sentiment remains mixed, analysts are scrutinizing structure, liquidity, and on‑chain dynamics to gauge the probability of renewed upside versus a deeper retracement.
Key takeaways
- Bitcoin’s current setup bears resemblance to the middle phases of prior bear markets, suggesting another potential leg down below $60,000 if buyers fail to sustain momentum.
- Several voices contend the bottom may be in, forecasting a breakout toward $75,000–$80,000 if demand persists and overhead resistance weakens.
- The move to $74,000 has been followed by caution signals, including a bearish chart pattern and persistent resistance near highs, which have sparked renewed debate about the cycle’s trajectory.
- Historical fractals from the 2022 bear market are often cited by bears as a reminder that euphoric rallies can precede severe declines, including revisits to sub-$60,000 levels.
- Commodity-style drivers such as strong spot‑BTC ETF inflows and tightening supply are cited as factors that could sustain a longer‑term rally, potentially supporting a climb toward the $75,000–$80,000 zone if conditions stay favorable.
Tickers mentioned: $BTC
Sentiment: Neutral
Price impact: Neutral. The narrative centers on potential scenarios rather than an established directional move.
Trading idea (Not Financial Advice): Hold. Given mixed signals and a lack of a clear breakout or breakdown, a cautious stance is warranted until clearer support or resistance levels emerge.
Market context: The broader market is digesting liquidity shifts and policy expectations as ETF inflows intensify and supply tightens, factors that could either reinforce a nascent rally or amplify a retest of lower levels depending on risk appetite and macro cues.
Why it matters
The ongoing tug-of-war around BTC’s price has broad implications for traders, institutions, and on‑chain participants. If the market can sustain momentum above key pivots, the narrative shifts toward a continued ascent into the mid-to-upper 70k range and beyond, potentially attracting fresh inflows from both retail and institutional players. Conversely, a failure to hold critical support could unleash a renewed wave of selling pressure, testing the resilience of buyers and reviving memories of the sharp drawdowns that defined earlier cycles.
One of the most salient factors shaping the near-term outlook is liquidity. The year has seen a divergence between price action and on-chain signals, with exchange outflows and the behavior of large holders cited by analysts as meaningful foreshadowing tools. For instance, a notable episode where substantial BTC moved off exchanges was highlighted as an indicator of potential accumulation. Observers also point to the interplay between on-chain activity and risk sentiment, noting that the absence or presence of major liquidity events often precedes meaningful price moves.
Another layer of complexity comes from the macro backdrop and regulatory considerations. As strategic investors reassess risk, the direction of ETF inflows—especially for spot BTC products—has become a barometer for institutional confidence. In this context, the current cycle’s mix of supply constraints and growing demand could tilt the market toward a more sustained rally, provided that macro conditions remain conducive and risk appetite stays buoyant. However, if macro momentum stalls or adverse developments emerge, the same structural strengths could be insufficient to prevent a retest of lower zones, underscoring the sensitivity of BTC to both investment flows and broad market psychology.
What to watch next
- BTC must hold above the $70,000 level to maintain the bullish setup; a break below could raise the risk of a reversion toward the mid-$60,000s.
- Sustained inflows into spot Bitcoin ETFs and related products would be a bullish catalyst, potentially reinforcing hands that expect higher highs in the near term.
- On-chain and market microstructure signals around the $62,000–$65,000 band will be pivotal for setting the next swing direction, as that zone is flagged by some analysts as a concentration of demand.
- Traders will be watching whether the market revisits sub-$60,000 levels in a worst-case scenario, as historical analogs have shown such levels can reappear even after renewed optimism.
Sources & verification
- Bitcoin price movements around the $74,000 high and subsequent pullback, with references to a rise toward $72k in related discussions.
- Historical context citing the October 2025 all-time peak near $126,000, used to frame the volatility of the current cycle.
- Reports of anomalous BTC exchange outflows and their potential implications for liquidity and future price action.
- Technical and chart-focused analyses that discuss patterns like death crosses and resistance levels that have influenced market sentiment.
Market reaction and key details
Market observers continue to dissect Bitcoin’s price behavior within a framework that weighs whether key milestones herald a durable pivot or a temporary pause before another leg lower. The move to approximately $74,000 has provoked a spectrum of interpretations, from calls for caution to bets on a renewed upswing. As with prior cycles, the narrative now centers on whether the current rally can sustain itself in the face of technical overheads, liquidity dynamics, and evolving macro cues.
What the data say about the near term
The fractal view—where past bear-market patterns repeat in a compressed timeline—remains a touchstone for many market watchers. Some analysts argue that the current structure mirrors the mid-phases of previous cycles, which could imply additional downside risk if the strength of the bounce fades. Others stress that the market environment has shifted through a combination of supportive factors, including tighter supply and escalating institutional interest, which could cushion against a sharp retreat.
Notable voices in the community have offered contrasting takes. One analyst highlighted that each cycle tends to form a local top before a new cycle of price discovery, a pattern that could imply a correction after the recent rally. Others point to a different dynamic this time around, arguing that the combination of liquidity pumps and on‑chain behavior may yield a higher probability of a sustained breakout. The discussion is nuanced, and the outcome will hinge on the durability of support at critical levels and the intensity of buying pressure as the market digests new information.
As part of the broader narrative, several observers emphasized the potential influence of external factors beyond price action alone. The trajectory of ETF inflows, for instance, could prove decisive in shaping near-term momentum, while shifts in risk appetite driven by macro developments will likely redefine the odds of success for a move above the $75,000 threshold. In that regard, the market remains highly sensitive to headlines and liquidity shifts, with traders adopting a careful stance until a clearer pattern emerges.
Analysts who track swing dynamics note that, even if the path stays volatile, there is a growing recognition that the market is being influenced by a broader regime shift—one where on‑ramp liquidity, speculative positions, and institutional participation interact in ways that were less pronounced in earlier cycles. The result is a more complex price landscape, where a single event or data point is unlikely to decide the outcome. Instead, market participants will likely respond to a constellation of signals, including on‑chain flows, ETF activity, and macro indicators, as they gauge whether the current cycle is setting up for a durable move or another retracement.
For now, the consensus remains mixed. The price action to date—coupled with warnings of potential sub-$60,000 revisits and the prospect of a breakout if certain levels hold—suggests that risk-managed positioning may be prudent for those navigating this period of uncertainty. The story remains about the balance of power between bears and bulls, with the outcome likely to be defined by the next few price swings rather than a single trend line.
Sam Bankman-Fried’s X account, which claims to relay the convicted fraudster’s words “through a proxy,” is now apparently spending much of its time following promoters of insider enrichment schemes.
Among those followed by the account, according to tracker service Web3 Alerts, are a robot memecoin promoter, a “chaos trader on Solana shitters,” and another memecoin trader.
Another follow claims to be “manifesting 1000x” but most probably hasn’t.
The tracker first flagged the pattern on February 26 when @SBF_FTX followed someone who claims to be a “copy trade messiah.”
Its owner openly promotes a token that’s lost one-quarter of its value in the past three months and is down 90% from its December 24 high.
The token’s description has all the hallmarks of AI slop, including run-on sentences, universality, superficiality, and a word salad of futuristic buzzwords. It reads:
“An end-to-end solution enabling agents across domains, frameworks, and specialties to work together seamlessly in a unified environment—combining custom cognitive frameworks, collaborative architectures, and intelligent integrations to enable novel ways of executing work. From business automation to creative production, users will have access to agentic-driven workflows that adapt to their needs, enabling them to streamline processes and tackle ambitious projects with more autonomy than ever before. The entire agent-powered teams can be configured, deployed, and tailored without necessitating any technical expertise. We are defining a new era in personal autonomy.”
Whoever controls Bankman-Fried’s X account also followed someone on March 5 whose bio advertises a “Trojan referal bot” (that probably follows all terms of service and spells correctly when it actually conducts those referrals).
That account promotes a Marco Rubio memecoin, “the most memeable guy right now” besides thousands of more famous people.
There are, of course, dozens of Marco Rubio memecoins with track records of near-total collapse, and a limitless supply of new, interchangeable celebrity memecoins.
Whoever is relaying Bankman-Fried’s messages from prison wants to know about them.
A proxy for prison communications
The @SBF_FTX account uses Bureau of Prisons-approved phone calls and emails to relay the prisoner’s words via tweets. Its bio reads: “SBF’s words. Posted through a proxy” and notes that follows don’t indicate endorsements.
That disclaimer does a lot of heavy lifting. In recent weeks, SBF has been re-litigating his criminal conviction in the court of public opinion. He’s serving a 25-year sentence for fraud and conspiracy after stealing roughly $8 billion from FTX customers.
Read more: SBF wants Trump to know he was working with Republicans all along
Federal inmates may not access social media directly. “A friend” manages it on Bankman-Fried’s behalf.
The follow spree from SBF’s account
All of this isn’t just disturbing, it has profound financial ramifications. Unfortunately, the @SBF_FTX account still moves markets.
For example, when it posted “gm” in September 2025, the former FTX token FTT surged 60% within minutes. Follows or mentions from the account can push real traffic toward obscure tokens, disclaimer or not.
The follow spree raises obvious, indeterminate questions. Has the convicted architect of one of crypto’s largest frauds directed his “friend” to follow memecoin promoters from a federal prison? Why is this person following a “chaos trader on Solana shitters”? Why is SBF’s account lending a million followers’ worth of credibility to coin peddlers in the first place?
Bankman-Fried took billions of dollars from FTX customers, without their consent, to trade at his offshore hedge fund, Alameda Research.
Now someone speaking for him is following the next generation of coin promoters.
Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news, follow us on X, Bluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.
NewsBeat34 seconds ago
Expensive Harrogate mayoral chain will be used on special dates
Business2 minutes ago
Why Physical Office Strategy is the New Competitive Edge
Crypto World3 minutes ago
Western Alliance (WAL) Stock Drops 12% as Jefferies Declines $126M Payment
-
Politics3 days agoAlan Cumming Brands Baftas Ceremony A ‘Triggering S**tshow’
-
Fashion7 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Iris Top
-
Tech5 days agoUnihertz’s Titan 2 Elite Arrives Just as Physical Keyboards Refuse to Fade Away
-
NewsBeat6 days agoAbusive parents will now be treated like sex offenders and placed on a ‘child cruelty register’ | News UK
-
NewsBeat6 days agoDubai flights cancelled as Brit told airspace closed ’10 minutes after boarding’
-
Sports6 days ago
The Vikings Need a Duck
-
NewsBeat6 days agoThe empty pub on busy Cambridge road that has been boarded up for years
-
NewsBeat5 days ago‘Significant’ damage to boarded-up Horden house after fire
-
Tech1 day agoBitwarden adds support for passkey login on Windows 11
-
Entertainment4 days agoBaby Gear Guide: Strollers, Car Seats
-
Sports21 hours ago499 runs and 34 sixes later, India beat England to enter T20 World Cup final | Cricket News
-
Politics6 days ago
FIFA hypocrisy after Israel murder over 400 Palestinian footballers
-
NewsBeat5 days agoEmirates confirms when flights will resume amid Dubai airport chaos
-
NewsBeat4 days agoIs it acceptable to comment on the appearance of strangers in public? Readers discuss
-
Tech5 days agoViral ad shows aged Musk, Altman, and Bezos using jobless humans to power AI
-
Video4 days agoHow to Build Finance Dashboards With AI in Minutes
-
Business3 days agoGuthrie Disappearance Enters Fifth Week as Family Visits Memorial
-
Crypto World5 days agoUS Judge Lets Binance Unregistered Token Class Action Proceed
-
NewsBeat4 days agoUkraine-Russia war latest: Belgium releases video showing forces boarding Russian shadow fleet oil tanker
-
Fashion5 days agoOn the Scene at the 57th Annual NAACP Image Awards: Teyana Taylor in Black Ashi Studio, Colman Domingo in Yellow Sergio Hudson, Chloe Bailey in Christian Siriano, and More!