Connect with us

Crypto World

EU Central Bank President Reportedly Blocked Binance in Greece, Will France Approve?

Published

on

EU Central Bank President Reportedly Blocked Binance in Greece, Will France Approve?

Binance is refusing to retreat from Europe after its Greek bid for a MiCA license collapsed. Multiple reports claimed European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde pushed Athens to reject the world’s largest crypto exchange.

The reversal leaves the company barely a week to find another route into the bloc before its temporary permissions lapse on July 1. Binance insists it has no intention of leaving.

How Binance’s MiCA Bid Unraveled in Athens

Binance filed its Greek application in January 2026 through a local subsidiary. Approval there would have unlocked passporting rights across all 27 member states under the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) framework.

Advertisement

Without it, unlicensed platforms must stop serving EU clients once the MiCA transitional deadline passes.

Binance had reportedly cleared key reviews before Greece’s approval process unraveled in mid-June. The same reports allege Lagarde told Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis the exchange was not welcome.

None of the ECB, Greek officials, or Binance has confirmed this claim.

Advertisement

Reuters reported that regulators balked at Binance’s past penalties for money laundering, its sprawling structure, and what they viewed as a risk-taking culture.

In 2023, it pleaded guilty in the US to Bank Secrecy Act and sanctions breaches, paid $4.3 billion, and founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ) stepped down.

“Binance is not leaving Europe,” Gillian Lynch, Head of Europe and UK, reportedly told Reuters.

Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens

Can the European Central Bank Keep Binance Out?

Reports tie the resistance to Binance’s dominant role in dollar-pegged stablecoin liquidity. The ECB casts such dollar tokens as a threat to monetary sovereignty and is advancing its own digital euro, which it hopes to issue by 2029.

Advertisement

Still, the central bank holds no formal veto over MiCA approvals. National regulators grant the licenses, so Lagarde’s leverage runs through political pressure rather than direct authority.

That structure cuts both ways:

  • One approval passports across all 27 states, and Binance needs a single yes.
  • Meanwhile, blocking it everywhere would require pressure in every capital it approaches.

Dozens of rivals have already cleared MiCA, including Kraken in Ireland, leaving the biggest exchange a holdout.

Binance contacted four or five regulators but filed only in Greece. France is the likely next test, where Binance has held an AMF registration since 2022 but also faces an aggravated money-laundering investigation by French prosecutors.

Overriding a second national regulator would carry a higher political cost, and Binance has abandoned EU markets before.

Advertisement

Compliance Culture, Not Headcount

Binance’s defense leans on scale, pointing to heavy investment and about 1,500 compliance staff.

Critics argue that it misses the point, because hiring thousands of compliance staff means little if those teams lack authority.

This is much like Binance’s 2022 clash with UK regulators.

“Let’s see how Binance plays the regulatory arbitrage game again…Regulators are ultimately evaluating outcomes, not organizational charts,” OKX CEO and vocal CZ critic, Star Xu, chimed.

Not everyone sees a cliff edge. Analyst Paul Barron called the July cutoff a priced-in consolidation, arguing the headline “90%” counts dormant shell registrations, not active venues.

Advertisement

The coming days will show whether Binance can secure a foothold elsewhere, and how far the ECB’s informal reach extends across the bloc.

The post EU Central Bank President Reportedly Blocked Binance in Greece, Will France Approve? appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Tokenized stock trading surged 288% in July, but one QQQ token drove most of it

Published

on

Tokenized equities onchain trading (CoinDesk Data)

Trading volume for tokenized stocks and ETFs surged 288% to a record $11.3 billion in July, though most of the increase came from a single Binance-linked token.

Binance bStocks accounted for $9.41 billion, or 83.3% of the total, according to CoinDesk Data’s latest Stablecoins & Tokenized Assets report. A bStocks token, QQQB, tracking Invesco’s QQQ ETF, generated $9.27 billion alone, equivalent to roughly 82% of all tokenized-equity volume.

Tokenized equities onchain trading (CoinDesk Data)

Excluding QQQB, July volume was roughly $2.03 billion, about 30% below the market’s implied June total of $2.91 billion. xStocks volume dropped to $335 million from $1.55 billion, while Ondo recorded $792 million and Backpack $479 million, the report details.

QQQB began trading on Binance on June 30 with zero maker fees through Aug. 31. Binance also began counting stocks and bStocks volume at three times its traded value for some users seeking higher VIP tiers on July 23, though the multiplier does not alter actual trading volume.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Crypto PAC Adds $1M More to Michigan House Race Campaign

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

An affiliate committee of the crypto-focused Fairshake political operation has increased its ad spending ahead of next week’s primary election in Michigan’s 13th Congressional District, according to Federal Election Commission filings. The spending highlights how cryptocurrency companies continue to shape campaign activity through super PAC and affiliate structures as lawmakers consider major digital-asset policy.

As of Thursday, Protect Progress PAC reported spending more than $2 million on broadcast and digital media related to the Michigan Democratic primary between Rep. Shri Thanedar and challenger Donavan McKinney. The latest filing reflected a rapid acceleration from the amount the PAC reported just a week earlier, including nearly $884,240 in additional ad buys supporting Thanedar and more than $150,000 aimed at opposing McKinney.

Key takeaways

  • Protect Progress PAC reported over $2 million in media spending tied to Michigan’s 13th District Democratic primary, based on FEC filings as of Thursday.
  • New filings nearly doubled prior reported spend, adding $884,240 for Thanedar and more than $150,000 to oppose McKinney.
  • The spending is connected to crypto-aligned political groups, with Protect Progress described as an affiliate of Fairshake.
  • Thanedar’s record includes crypto-related legislative actions, including support for stablecoin and digital asset market structure proposals.
  • Fairshake affiliates are active in multiple primaries, including races in Washington and Alabama ahead of their own election dates.

Michigan primary: Protect Progress ramps up ad buys

FEC documents show Protect Progress PAC has concentrated its spending on one of the most closely watched parts of this election cycle for crypto industry-aligned political efforts: candidate positioning around digital-asset legislation. In Michigan’s 13th district, the committee’s ad spending is designed to back incumbent Rep. Shri Thanedar while targeting his Democratic primary opponent, Donavan McKinney.

The latest filing effectively widened the committee’s footprint compared with what it had reported in an earlier submission. It added $884,240 in media expenditures supporting Thanedar and more than $150,000 opposing McKinney, bringing total reported media spend to over $2 million.

FEC filings are available through the committee’s FEC record: FEC document inquiry.

Advertisement

Why Thanedar’s crypto record mattered to the PAC

Protect Progress’s focus on Thanedar aligns with the incumbent’s legislative record on digital-asset issues. During his time in the U.S. House, Thanedar voted in favor of stablecoin-focused legislation known as the GENIUS Act. He also voted in favor of a crypto market structure proposal currently under consideration in the Senate, the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act.

In addition, Thanedar cosponsored the Promoting Innovation in Blockchain Development Act, an effort aimed at protecting blockchain developers. For PAC-affiliated political spending, these votes and sponsorships are often treated as concrete signals of candidate alignment—especially as CLARITY work advances through Congress.

McKinney’s campaign challenged the premise that the race is driven solely by local issues. In a July 21 statement related to the PAC’s spending, McKinney argued that “the crypto lobby is paying my opponent back” for his support of policy decisions tied to the Trump administration.

McKinney also referenced President Donald Trump’s disclosures that he earned more than $1.4 billion from crypto investments in 2025, including through his memecoin, Official Trump (TRUMP), and via his family’s business, World Liberty Financial. Democrats have frequently accused the Trump administration of profiting from its position through laws affecting the crypto sector, including proposals like GENIUS. (Those claims are linked in the original reporting to Trump’s disclosed earnings and related coverage.)

Advertisement

Fairshake affiliates keep spending across the election map

Protect Progress is described as an affiliate of the Fairshake PAC. Fairshake and related committees have been a major force in U.S. federal elections in recent cycles, channeling large sums toward candidates seen as supportive of crypto-industry aligned policy.

Earlier reporting cited that Fairshake was responsible for more than $170 million in spending during the 2024 election cycle through media supporting candidates it viewed as favorable to crypto policy. The same reporting framework also noted that Protect Progress and other affiliates had already directed millions of dollars into 2026 races in multiple states.

More broadly, the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen reported in June that Fairshake and its affiliates accounted for spending of more than $82 million out of roughly $189 million that crypto companies used across the 2026 election cycle. Public Citizen also reported Fairshake’s claimed war chest of $193 million as of January, underscoring the scale of activity behind affiliate PAC machinery.

More primaries: Washington and Alabama spotlight additional spending

While Michigan remains a focal point, other Fairshake affiliates have also targeted races as primaries approach. In Washington’s 4th congressional district, the Fairshake affiliate Defend American Jobs PAC spent more than $65,000 on media to support a Republican candidate. Washington’s primary is scheduled for the same day as Michigan’s.

Advertisement

Alabama’s primary, set for Aug. 11, has similarly attracted attention from Fairshake affiliates. FEC filings indicate Defend American Jobs spent more than $511,000 on media supporting Jerry Carl Jr., a Republican who served in Alabama’s 1st congressional district from 2021 to 2025.

One additional datapoint in the reporting around the Alabama race is the scale of the candidate’s personal wealth. The original article referenced a reported net worth figure of up to $15 million in 2023, citing a separate local report.

What to watch next in crypto-linked elections

As PAC affiliate spending continues to surge in primary contests, voters and market participants will likely watch whether crypto-aligned policy commitments translate into measurable legislative momentum—particularly on stablecoin and market-structure proposals such as GENIUS and CLARITY. The next FEC disclosures may clarify how much more media time these committees add as voting dates approach.

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Analyst Blasts Strategy After CEO Signals New Priority Beyond Bitcoin

Published

on

It was precisely six years ago when a rather unknown company in the cryptocurrency industry at the time made a revolutionary change to its asset reserve strategy and adopted Bitcoin. The entity in question, called MicroStrategy back then, started to accumulate BTC en masse and only accelerated its purchases after the 2024 presidential elections in the US.

The community became accustomed to hearing about new acquisitions made by the company, some of which were worth billions of dollars. Its total stash grew exponentially and currently sits at 843,775 units. Within this timeframe, BTC bulls consistently heard that the company (and its former CEO) would never sell… until they did. And then everything changed.

During the most recent earnings call, the company hinted that it has plans to sell up to $5 billion in bitcoin, which is significantly higher than the previously claimed $1.25 billion.

The Latest Shift

Strategy (as it is called now) has gone five consecutive weeks without purchasing BTC, marking its longest acquisition pause in years. Instead of deploying capital into BTC, the firm has steadily increased its cash reserve through recent fundraising activities. As we previously reported, Strategy has been rebuilding its USD position while continuing to explore financial options tied to its expanding portfolio of preferred stock offerings.

Advertisement

In the most recent official change, CEO Phong Le took to X to announce the company’s new primary corporate objective, which reads:

“Our corporate objective is for STRC to trade at $99-$100 over time.”

In the earnings call, he was more specific:

“Our intent is to sell bitcoin for three reasons when we think it’s appropriate for the company. One, fund the U.S. dollar reserve up to $1.25 billion. Additional reasons include funding dividend and interest payments of $1.76 billion a year and funding up to $2 billion in common and preferred stock repurchases,” Le said, according to a FactSet transcript.

The tweet and comments garnered immediate reactions from some well-known industry commentators as well as constant critic Peter Schiff, who was quick to determine that: “In other words, common shareholders are screwed.”

Crypto Kaleo, though, a popular analyst who recently argued that Strategy would have to sell at least 50,000 BTC in the next couple of years to fund dividend payments, wasn’t so kind. In one tweet, he ironically asked whether the CEO remembers when the company’s primary corporate objective was to increase Bitcoin per share before adding: “It was only two months ago, so shouldn’t be difficult!”

Advertisement

In another post, though, he brought the bashing to a higher level, claiming that Strategy is no longer a BTC company. Instead, it operates as a credit company, and its credit rating is “atrocious.”

The comments below his post were split. Some agreed that Strategy is increasingly resembling a leveraged financial organization rather than a straightforward BTC holding company. Others defended the firm’s approach, noting that maintaining confidence in STRC is essential if Strategy wants to continue raising capital efficiently and safely for future crypto purchases.

STRC Matters

The Saylor-co-founded company launched STRC as part of its growing suite of preferred stock offerings designed to finance its long-term BTC accumulation strategy. However, it needs to trade at its par price of $100 to function properly, and it hasn’t been able to for months. It dumped below $75 at one point, before the company shifted its focus to rebuilding its USD reserve. It has since recovered to almost $90.

As such, some investors view Le’s comments as a tactical, short-term objective rather than believing Strategy has abandoned its Bitcoin-focused vision. Still, the timing has fueled questions about the firm’s evolving identity and strategy, especially given the ongoing market uncertainty.

Advertisement

The post Analyst Blasts Strategy After CEO Signals New Priority Beyond Bitcoin appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

SEC to review Nasdaq bitcoin options approval after CME challenge

Published

on

The SEC’s latest crypto guidance still leaves too much unsaid

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has paused Nasdaq’s approval of cash-settled bitcoin index options and will reconsider the decision following a legal challenge from CME Group, the agency said in an order released for public inspection on July 31.

Back in May, the SEC granted Nasdaq PHLX conditional approval to list cash-settled bitcoin index options under the ticker QBTC. The product still required exemptions from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) before it could launch.

CME Group challenged the approval in June, arguing that bitcoin is a commodity and, as such, options tied directly to its value fall under the CFTC’s exclusive jurisdiction rather than the SEC’s.

If the CME is right, the SEC would have no authority to approve QBTC, and Nasdaq would need to register as a CFTC-regulated futures or swaps venue, or redesign the contracts to track a security such as a spot bitcoin exchange-traded fund.

Advertisement

The CME already operates regulated bitcoin futures and options markets, while Nasdaq’s QBTC would compete for the same trading activity without Nasdaq registering under the CFTC framework that governs the CME.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitcoin mining difficulty shrinks 14% from this year’s high as plunging revenues force operators to pivot

Published

on

Bitcoin mining difficulty year-over-year change (Luxor)

Bitcoin’s mining difficulty has fallen below its year-earlier level for only the second time in the network’s history as weak mining economics and the shift toward artificial intelligence weigh on capacity growth.

The metric, which measures how difficult it is to mine a Bitcoin block, is now at 126.23 trillion after falling 0.74%, about 1.1% below the 127.62 trillion reached a year earlier and 19.1% from the 155.97 trillion all-time high seen in November 2025.

Difficulty adjusts every 2,016 blocks, or roughly every two weeks, to keep Bitcoin’s average block time near 10 minutes. Falling difficulty indicates that less computing power was competing during the previous adjustment period, while reducing competition for miners that remain online.

The metric has dropped about 14% from its January peak, reached this year, following declines of 10% in June and 5% earlier in July, according to network data.

Advertisement

The only previous year-over-year decline was after China’s 2021 mining ban, which temporarily removed roughly half of the network’s computing power. Difficulty recovered as miners relocated to other regions.

Bitcoin mining difficulty year-over-year change (Luxor)

This time around, the plunge is more mining economics-based.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bank of Italy research suggests stablecoins aren’t necessarily cheaper for remittances

Published

on

Bank of Italy research suggests stablecoins aren't necessarily cheaper for remittances

For years, stablecoins have been marketed as crypto’s breakthrough application for cross-border payments, promising near-instant transfers at a fraction of the cost charged by traditional remittance providers.

Sending USDC across a blockchain may indeed cost only a few cents but a new study from the Bank of Italy suggests that isn’t what most people actually pay when they send money home.

In a mystery-shopping exercise spanning 10 international remittance corridors, researchers found that stablecoin-based transfers were not systematically cheaper than conventional money transfer operators once the full journey, from bank account to crypto wallet and back into local currency, was taken into account.

The study, published as Markets, Infrastructures and Payment Systems Paper No. 86, tracked transfers of 200 USDC from Italy to destinations including Argentina, Brazil, South Africa, the UAE and Japan.

Advertisement

End-to-end costs varied dramatically, ranging from roughly 0.3% to almost 9% of the value transferred depending on the corridor and service providers used. Settlement times also differed widely, from around 20 minutes where domestic instant payment systems supported withdrawals to as long as two business days when recipients relied on conventional bank transfers.

Blind spots

A central bank highlighting shortcoming in the promises that stablecoins may make is in some ways to be expected. Traditional financial (TradFi) institutions may have a vested interest in undermining adoption of stablecoins – digital tokens pegged to fiat currencies. Digital currencies and blockchain were designed to remove much of the need for intermediaries, such as central banks, after all.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Crypto PAC Pours Another $1M into Michigan House Race

Published

on

Crypto PAC Pours Another $1M into Michigan House Race

An affiliate of a political action committee (PAC) funded largely by contributions from cryptocurrency companies Ripple Labs and Coinbase has poured more cash into ads for next week’s primary race in Michigan’s 13th Congressional District.

According to Federal Election Commission (FEC) filings as of Thursday, the Protect Progress PAC had spent more than a combined $2 million on media to support Michigan Representative Shri Thanedar in the state’s 13th district and oppose his Democratic challenger, Donavan McKinney. 

The most recent filings effectively doubled what the PAC had reported spending a week prior, with an additional $884,240 on ads to support Thanedar and more than $150,000 to oppose McKinney.

Source: FEC

During his time in the US House of Representatives, Thanedar voted in favor of the stablecoin-focused GENIUS Act legislation and the crypto market structure bill currently under consideration in the Senate, the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act. He also cosponsored the Promoting Innovation in Blockchain Development Act in an effort to protect developers. 

Advertisement

In a July 21 statement on the PAC spending supporting Thanedar, McKinney said “the crypto lobby is paying my opponent back for helping Trump make over $1 billion since taking office.” He was likely referring to the US President disclosing that he earned more than $1.4 billion from crypto investments in 2025, including from his memecoin, Official Trump (TRUMP) and through his family’s business, World Liberty Financial. Many Democrats have accused Trump of using his position to profit from the presidency through laws like GENIUS.

Cointelegraph reached out to Thanedar’s and McKinney’s campaigns for comment on the PAC expenditures but did not receive an immediate response.

Related: US senators sent revised ethics rules to White House for CLARITY Act: Report

Protect Progress is an affiliate of the Fairshake PAC, which was responsible for spending more than $170 million in the 2024 US election cycle through media supporting candidates it considered favoring crypto industry-aligned policies. The Michigan primary is scheduled for Tuesday, but the PAC and its affiliates have already poured millions of dollars into 2026 races in Texas, Illinois and other states.

Advertisement

The US consumer advocacy group Public Citizen reported in June that Fairshake and its affiliates were responsible for spending more than $82 million out of the roughly $189 million crypto companies had used in the 2026 election cycle. Fairshake reported holding a $193 million war chest as of January.

PAC spending in Washington and Alabama with primaries looming

In addition to Michigan’s primaries, the Fairshake affiliate Defend American Jobs PAC spent more than $65,000 on media to support a Republican running in Washington’s 4th congressional, according to FEC filings. Washington is scheduled to hold primaries the same day as Michigan.

Alabama, scheduled to hold primaries on Aug. 11, has also been a focus for Fairshake. FEC filings showed that Defend American Jobs spent more than $511,000 on media to support Jerry Carl Jr., a Republican who represented the state’s 1st congressional district from 2021 to 2025. Notably, the former Alabama lawmaker was one of the wealthiest in the state’s House delegation, with a reported net worth of up to $15 million in 2023.

Magazine: Crypto lobby spending on Republicans far outpaces Democratic support

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

MicroStrategy Post-Earnings CLARITY Act Push Could Add New Catalyst for Its Stock

Published

on

Strategy's MSTR Stock Performance. Source: Yahoo Finance

MicroStrategy endorsed the CLARITY Act on Friday, one day after reporting an $8.22 billion quarterly loss. The bill would rewrite how the United States regulates digital asset trading.

The endorsement hands MSTR shareholders a second variable to price. Regulatory momentum now sits beside the loss, a rising dividend bill, and a share price near 52-week lows.

Why the Timing Matters

Strategy, formerly MicroStrategy, reported second quarter results on July 30 and backed the market structure bill the next day. That sequence turned a policy statement into an earnings postscript.

The quarter was brutal. An $8.32 billion write-down produced an $8.22 billion net loss, or $24.45 per diluted share. A year earlier the same line delivered $32.60 of profit.

The market answered on Friday. MSTR closed at $93.28, down 4.56%, within 14% of its 52-week low of $81.81. Clear Street trimmed its price target to $201 from $240.

Strategy's MSTR Stock Performance. Source: Yahoo Finance
Strategy’s MSTR Stock Performance. Source: Yahoo Finance

Management therefore needed a story the quarter could not supply. Backing clearer rules delivered one.

What Clearer Rules Would Change for MSTR

The bill’s central jurisdictional split is plain enough. Securities-like tokens would sit with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

Digital commodities would move to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).

Advertisement

For MicroStrategy, that is a funding question rather than a Bitcoin question. The company raised $17.06 billion through at-the-market equity programs this year.

STRC preferred issuance added $7.53 billion, a 254% jump. The catalyst runs through the price of that capital.

Strategy pays 12% on STRC because the shares keep clearing below their $100 stated amount. A wider institutional bid would let it pay less.

Cheaper credit lowers the 10.8% hurdle. If that hurdle ever drops beneath the Bitcoin yield, per-share accretion resumes. That spread is the whole argument for owning MSTR instead of Bitcoin.

Advertisement

Those buyers answer to compliance committees. Executive Chairman Michael Saylor has argued for years that regulation accelerates institutional acceptance rather than restraining it.

“I support advancing the CLARITY Act through bipartisan work to establish clear, durable rules, protect property rights, promote innovation, and strengthen American capital markets. Bitcoin will succeed with or without legislation, but America needs clarity for digital assets,” he articulated.

Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens

The Spread Clarity Would Have to Close

Clarity would not close that spread quickly. Chief Financial Officer Andrew Kang put the effective cost of credit at 10.8%. Strategy’s Bitcoin yield for the year is 4.5%.

Preferred dividends consumed $400.7 million last quarter, against $49.1 million a year earlier. The STRC rate now stands at 12.00%.

Advertisement

Investors are not paying par for that paper. Strategy repurchased 288,930 STRC shares at an average $86.53, a 13.47% discount to the $100 stated amount.

Bitcoin traded near $63,016 on Saturday, down 1.3% over 24 hours. At that price the 843,775 coin position is worth about $53.2 billion, roughly $10.5 billion below cost.

MSTR carries a market value of $35.87 billion. That collapse in MSTR’s premium tracks the senior claims stacked ahead of common shareholders, not the legal status of Bitcoin.

Advertisement

Strategy also authorized $1.0 billion to repurchase MSTR and has bought nothing. Management will act only below intrinsic value, a threshold it has not declared reached.

The bill’s record is stronger than its calendar. The House passed it 294 to 134 in July 2025. Senate Banking then advanced it 15 to 9 on May 14 under Chairman Tim Scott.

No floor vote is scheduled, however, and the Senate’s state work period begins August 10. MSTR holders inherit a catalyst with no date, while the 10.8% hurdle keeps its own schedule.

The post MicroStrategy Post-Earnings CLARITY Act Push Could Add New Catalyst for Its Stock appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitcoin Fear Reaches Record High as Coldcard Exploit Shakes Confidence in Self-Custody

Published

on

Although Bitcoin has gone through countless phases of massive fear, uncertainty, and doubt (FUD), the current crisis around Coldcard has triggered the worst wave of fear ever recorded on crypto social media channels.

So far, BTC has been able to weather the storm in terms of price moves to a large extent, even though it has slipped by a few grand. However, it appears that those losses are largely connected to other factors, such as the escalating tension in the Middle East.

Fear Through the Roof

Data provided by the analytics company Santiment Intelligence shows that Bitcoin has registered its lowest positive-to-negative commentary ratio since the firm began tracking such discussions across some of the most used platforms like X, Reddit, and Telegram. The current numbers show just 0.58 bullish comments for every bearish one, indicating that fear has overwhelmingly replaced optimism.

What’s even more intriguing is that this reaction is quite unusual since it has dwarfed all previous market shocks, including the rapid collapse of FTX, Mt. Gox, and the COVID-19 “Black Thursday” crash. None of them generated such extreme levels of negative comments online.

Advertisement

Santiment attributed the difference to psychological factors. While earlier crises primarily involved centralized exchanges or broader macroeconomic events, the Coldcard incident has raised questions about self-custody itself, which has long been considered Bitcoin’s safest storage method.

Binance’s Changpeng Zhao also commented on the recent developments, suggesting that even old wallets with a long history can have bugs. He believes nothing is 100% certain, which is why investors need to stay informed.

What Happened With Coldcard?

Security researchers disclosed last week that attackers had distributed malicious firmware capable of stealing wallet seed phrases during the device setup process. Coldcard users who installed the compromised software unknowingly exposed their recovery phrases, allowing attackers to drain their wallets after funds were deposited.

The estimated scale of the incident has grown significantly over the past few days. Current data shows that roughly 1,200 wallets have been compromised, losing nearly 1,100 BTC (worth over $70 million at current prices) during a coordinated 41-minute operation.

Advertisement

All transactions shared the same unusual fingerprint: identical 30sat/vB transaction fees, far above prevailing network rates, suggesting an automated sweeping tool. Furthermore, the attack occurred more than a day before Coldcard publicly warned customers about the compromised firmware.

The post Bitcoin Fear Reaches Record High as Coldcard Exploit Shakes Confidence in Self-Custody appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

South Korea’s 22% Crypto Tax Crashes Trading Volume

Published

on

Top 5 Crypto Exchanges in South Korea by Trading Volume - 24 Hours. Source: CoinGecko

South Korea confirmed a 22% crypto tax starting in 2027, just as trading volume across its five main exchanges collapsed nearly 55% during the first half of the year.

The timing raises an uncomfortable question about taxing a market that is already shrinking fast.

How the 22% Crypto Tax Will Work

Other income is a tax category covering gains that fall outside wages or business revenue. Under the Income Tax Act, profits from transferring or lending virtual assets will sit in that bracket.

Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Koo Yun-cheol confirmed the schedule on July 29 during a National Assembly committee meeting, saying the government is pushing forward as planned.

Advertisement

The mechanics are straightforward. Annual gains above 2.5 million won, roughly $1,740, face a 20% national tax, while a local levy raises the combined rate to 22%.

Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens.

Investors below that threshold owe nothing. First returns are expected in May 2028, covering income earned throughout 2027. The measure has a long history of delays. Lawmakers approved it in 2020 for a January 2022 start, postponed it to 2025, then pushed it to 2027.

Advertisement

Opposition remains active. People Power Party lawmaker Kim Sang-hoon criticized the design because investors cannot offset losses against gains earned in later years.

That restriction could push traders offshore. Kim warned activity might migrate toward overseas exchanges, decentralized platforms, or peer-to-peer markets, reducing both volume and tax visibility at home.

Koo acknowledged the concern but resisted changes. Moving crypto into a capital-gains framework would require a review of the broader tax treatment of financial markets, he argued.

Why Is South Korean Trading Volume Collapsing

A separate opposition bill filed in March seeks to remove crypto income from the Income Tax Act entirely. Lawmakers referred it to a subcommittee, keeping repeal or another delay legally possible.

Advertisement

The volume figures explain the anxiety. Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, and Gopax generated roughly $366.58 billion in combined trading volume during the first six months.

That marked a 54.6% drop from the same period in 2025. The contraction continued through July, with cumulative volume falling by 16.9% compared with June.

Concentration is reshaping the market. Upbit processed about 11.69 trillion won in July, and while its volume fell 10%, its market share climbed from 62.3% to 67.4%.

Bithumb moved in the opposite direction. Its share slipped from 30.7% to 27.1%, widening the gap with Upbit to 40.3 percentage points.

Advertisement

Subscribe to our YouTube channel to watch leaders and journalists provide expert insights.

Top 5 Crypto Exchanges in South Korea by Trading Volume - 24 Hours. Source: CoinGecko
Top 5 Crypto Exchanges in South Korea by Trading Volume – 24 Hours. Source: CoinGecko

These figures may be attributable to the shift in liquidity concentration toward larger platforms during periods of slowdown.

Deeper order books absorb bigger trades with less slippage, reinforcing dominance when overall activity falls.

Smaller exchanges face real pressure. Coinone, Korbit, and Gopax are reportedly exploring partnerships with securities firms, institutional services, and restructuring.

Future competition may hinge less on raw volume. Stablecoin liquidity, regulatory compliance, and institutional access could matter more than retail spot trading alone.

Advertisement

The post South Korea’s 22% Crypto Tax Crashes Trading Volume appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025