Crypto ATM availability is shrinking in the United States as new state laws designed to curb fraud and tighten consumer protections move into force. Tennessee and Georgia are the latest states to impose restrictions effective this week, following earlier actions in Indiana and upcoming enforcement in Minnesota.

The changes reflect a broader pattern: regulators and lawmakers across the US are targeting kiosks after scammers used them—often to trick vulnerable residents—into sending funds. For operators, the result is a more complex compliance landscape and, in some cases, an unsustainable business model.

Key takeaways

• Tennessee has implemented a statewide ban that prohibits the use and installation of crypto ATMs and kiosks.
• Georgia allows crypto ATMs to operate but introduces transaction caps, customer warnings, and reporting requirements, with provisions that can include refunds in certain fraud cases.
• Earlier state bans include Indiana (effective in March), while Minnesota is set to enforce a ban on Aug. 1.
• Regulatory pressure is already showing up financially, with Bitcoin Depot filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy after signaling “substantial doubts” about its future.

Tennessee and Georgia tighten rules on crypto kiosks

Georgia and Tennessee each passed crypto ATM legislation that takes effect on Wednesday, but the approaches differ sharply. Tennessee’s law—signed by Governor Bill Lee in April—implements a complete prohibition on both installing and using cryptocurrency ATMs and kiosks.

Georgia’s law is more permissive while still aiming to reduce consumer harm. It requires operators to limit the amount of money sent by users, issue warnings to customers, and in some scenarios refund people who may have been defrauded.

Before Tennessee’s statewide ban took effect on July 1, CoinATMRadar data cited by CoinATMRadar’s Tennessee listing indicates there were 185 crypto ATMs and kiosks operating in the state.

Why lawmakers are moving from “local bans” to statewide action

The Tennessee and Georgia measures follow a wave of earlier regulatory efforts aimed at crypto ATM operators. Cointelegraph previously reported that multiple jurisdictions and municipalities have begun cracking down on kiosks, largely in response to scams in which victims—particularly older adults—were persuaded to send cryptocurrency through ATM-style machines.

Delaware and New Jersey, for example, have considered proposals that would impose complete bans, according to earlier coverage referenced in the original reporting. The direction of travel is consistent: lawmakers increasingly view crypto ATMs as high-risk access points for fraud rather than neutral on-ramps.

As these restrictions expand, operators face more than just reduced machine counts. Compliance obligations—such as monitoring transactions, handling fraud-related disputes, and meeting consumer protection requirements—can increase costs while limiting revenue options.

Regulation’s downstream effects: bankruptcy risk for operators

For the industry, the regulatory tightening is not only theoretical. The restrictions may have already contributed to at least one major operator’s distress.

In May, Bitcoin Depot filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. In the days leading up to the filing, the company disclosed that it had “substantial doubts” about its future amid a challenging regulatory environment and ongoing litigation.

Roshan Dharia, CEO of Echo Base and a restructuring adviser, told Cointelegraph after the Chapter 11 filing that Bitcoin Depot’s bankruptcy likely foreshadows broader pressure on the crypto ATM sector. Dharia argued that the traditional operator model relied on relatively high transaction spreads and fewer regulatory constraints, which helped offset the high costs of compliance, cash logistics, fraud remediation, and retail revenue-sharing arrangements.

That equation, Dharia said, is breaking down as states increasingly impose consumer-protection standards. Those standards can compress fees while increasing operator liability for scam-related activity and raising expectations for transaction monitoring and reimbursement—factors that can strain business viability, especially for operators with thinner margins.

Canada signals a wider policy debate

While the latest developments are focused on US states, Canada’s regulatory conversation is also moving toward harsher restrictions. Earlier, federal policymakers in Canada proposed a total ban on crypto ATMs across the country.

The proposal would still allow Canadians to buy digital assets from brick-and-mortar money services businesses, but it would remove the kiosk pathway. Officials described crypto ATMs as the “primary method” used by scammers to defraud victims and as a channel for criminals to put cash proceeds of crime into the digital asset ecosystem.

What to watch next

With Tennessee now operating under a full ban and Georgia enforcing limits and reporting, attention will likely shift to how quickly other states follow suit—particularly Minnesota ahead of its Aug. 1 deadline—and whether operators adjust by exiting certain markets or restructuring their compliance and fraud-handling processes.

Reform UK has removed a proposed crypto bill from its website amid ongoing controversy around billionaire Tether investor Christopher Harborne’s secret £5 million “gift” to the party’s leader, Nigel Farage.

The Cryptoassets and Digital Finance Bill was announced last year during the Bitcoin 2025 conference in Las Vegas. However, The Nerve reports that the bill was scrubbed from the website on May 30 this year. 

The Nerve also notes that the bill’s PDF can still be found online but is no longer present on Reform UK’s own website.  

A month before the bill’s removal, The Guardian revealed that Reform leader Farage was given £5 million by billionaire Christopher Harborne before he ran for election in June 2024. 

Anchorage Digital says it has integrated its off-exchange settlement system with Binance, enabling select institutional clients to trade on Binance without depositing their crypto or cash directly onto the exchange. Instead, clients’ assets and funds can remain in qualified custody at Anchorage—a federally chartered US crypto bank—until settlement.

The arrangement is built around margin and collateral mechanics: institutions can use crypto assets or US dollar deposits held with Anchorage to satisfy Binance’s margin requirements, without moving those holdings to Binance first. Anchorage and Binance framed the workflow as a separation of custody from trade execution, aiming to reduce the operational friction—and counterparty exposure—that can come with pre-funding trades on exchanges.

Key takeaways

• Anchorage integrated its off-exchange settlement platform with Binance to support institutional trading while keeping custody at Anchorage.
• Clients can use Anchorage-held crypto or US dollar deposits as collateral for Binance margin without transferring assets to the exchange.
• The model is positioned as a response to exchange counterparty risk and aims to improve capital efficiency by avoiding pre-funding.
• Anchorage’s Atlas platform is cited as the infrastructure behind this first off-exchange settlement implementation.
• Financial terms of the partnership were not disclosed.

How the Anchorage–Binance model changes custody and collateral

In traditional exchange-based workflows, institutions typically pre-fund trading accounts—transferring assets to the venue where trades are executed. Anchorage’s stated objective with this integration is to shift that balance. Under the collaboration, institutional clients can maintain crypto and cash in qualified custody with Anchorage while accessing trade execution through Binance.

Practically, the integration focuses on margin: Binance’s margin requirements are met using collateral held with Anchorage. The companies say this keeps assets in an independent custodian until settlement, rather than routing custody into the exchange account itself. By design, it also reduces the need for institutions to move holdings between custody providers and the trading venue ahead of every trade.

Anchorage said the rollout is available initially to select institutional clients, marking the first off-exchange settlement deployment for its Atlas platform—an infrastructure Anchorage describes as supporting institutional trading, settlement, lending, and collateral management using custody-based building blocks.

Why “off-exchange settlement” is drawing institutional attention

Exchange counterparty risk has long been one of the main frictions for institutions considering larger allocations to crypto trading. When assets must be deposited to an exchange to enable trading, risk is concentrated at the execution venue. Off-exchange settlement attempts to address that by keeping custody separate from the trading leg, with settlement handled via a different mechanism.

Anchorage and Binance framed their setup as moving closer to the custody-and-execution structure common in traditional financial markets, where institutions can separate where assets are held from where trades are executed and settled. The proposed benefit is twofold: it reduces exposure tied to pre-funding and may also improve capital efficiency by relying on custody-based collateral rather than tying funds to exchange balances.

While the companies did not disclose financial terms, they emphasized the core operational change: trades can be executed on Binance while crypto and cash remain with Anchorage through settlement—an approach intended to make institutional participation smoother without requiring full custody migration to the exchange.

Off-exchange settlement expands across major venues

This Anchorage–Binance integration sits within a broader industry pattern. Off-exchange settlement has been gaining traction among institutional crypto trading platforms throughout 2026, with multiple firms announcing similar custody-and-trade separation approaches.

According to earlier coverage from Cointelegraph, in April BitMEX partnered with Zodia Custody to allow institutional clients to trade derivatives while keeping collateral in segregated custody rather than depositing it onto the exchange. Under that structure, traders could access perpetual swaps and futures while collateral remained with Zodia and was mirrored for trading. BitMEX said the design eliminated the need to prefund exchange accounts and improved capital efficiency, while also reducing operational risks tied to moving assets between custody and trading venues.

In June, Bitget adopted a comparable model by integrating Fireblocks Off Exchange. Bitget said that its integration enables clients to execute trades from MPC-based wallets while keeping assets in trader-controlled collateral vaults rather than transferring them to the exchange. The company also claimed the platform can verify trading accounts are fully collateralized in real time without taking custody of client assets.

Separately, KuCoin Institutional expanded its custody offering earlier in the year by integrating Ceffu’s MirrorX platform in January. That system, according to the linked Ceffu and KuCoin Institutional material, is designed for institutional trading while digital assets remain in third-party custody, with funds mirrored for trading and settled off-chain every four hours.

Taken together, these deployments show a recurring theme: institutions increasingly want the flexibility of exchange liquidity and execution alongside custody structures that better match their risk controls. Off-exchange settlement is becoming a practical pathway to combine those priorities—at least for use cases offered through specific integrations between exchanges, custodians, and settlement platforms.

What investors should monitor next

For institutions, the most important questions now are likely operational and risk-related: which collateral types are supported end-to-end for margin, how settlement timing works in practice for different product categories, and how widely Anchorage’s off-exchange service will be rolled out beyond the initial select client group. Readers should also watch whether more major venues add similar custody-separated settlement layers, as that trend would further define how institutional crypto trading infrastructure evolves.

Key Takeaways

• Walmart shares plummeted more than 5% Wednesday, reaching their lowest point in eight months following a six-session losing streak
• Cleveland Research identified a deceleration in U.S. comparable store sales that may threaten analyst consensus figures, especially in July
• Shares began trading at $113.26, significantly beneath the 50-day moving average of $123.25
• Company insiders offloaded more than $1.06 billion worth of shares during the previous three months without any reported purchases
• Wall Street maintains a Moderate Buy rating with a consensus price target of $138.85, though valuation concerns have emerged

Shares of Walmart began Wednesday’s session at $113.26, representing a decline exceeding 5% and positioning the stock for its weakest closing price in eight months. This marked the sixth straight trading day of declines for WMT.

Walmart Inc., WMT

The catalyst behind the selloff was research from Cleveland Research, which identified signs of decelerating U.S. comparable store sales. The research firm cautioned that this trajectory may negatively impact consensus forecasts, with July’s performance being particularly critical.

In response to inventory challenges, Walmart has implemented price reductions and leveraged tariff refunds to cushion margin pressure. While this represents a strategic response, it underscores the genuine cost and demand challenges confronting the retailer.

The share price deterioration persists even after a robust first-quarter performance. The company delivered earnings of $0.66 per share in May, aligning with analyst projections, while revenue of $177.75 billion surpassed the anticipated $174.84 billion — representing a 7.4% year-over-year gain. Management also maintained its fiscal 2027 guidance of $2.75–$2.85 in earnings per share.

However, investors appear focused on future challenges rather than recent accomplishments.

Significant Insider Transactions Draw Attention

Insider trading patterns have been notably lopsided. Throughout the past quarter, company insiders divested more than $1.06 billion in WMT shares. No insider purchases were documented during this timeframe.

Executive Vice President Christopher Nicholas disposed of 2,900 shares at $123.92 on May 21st. Fellow EVP Latriece Watkins subsequently sold 11,000 shares at $118.97 on May 28th. Both transactions occurred through pre-established Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangements.

Although scheduled sales are standard practice, the substantial magnitude of insider selling has attracted investor scrutiny.

The stock currently trades at a P/E ratio of 39.74 — representing a premium valuation that several analysts question in light of potential growth deceleration. While its GF Score of 86/100 indicates strong long-term fundamentals, near-term momentum has turned decidedly negative.

Analyst Community Maintains Optimistic Stance

Notwithstanding the downturn, Wall Street analysts haven’t abandoned Walmart. The stock maintains a Moderate Buy consensus rating with an average price objective of $138.85 — substantially above present trading levels.

Recent analyst ratings feature a $145 Buy target from BTIG, $140 from Truist, and $137 Outperform ratings from both Wolfe Research and Royal Bank of Canada. Among 36 tracked analysts, 31 maintain Buy ratings and four recommend Hold. A single analyst assigns a Strong Buy rating.

Several institutional investors expanded positions during the first quarter. Littlejohn Financial Services established a fresh $2.81 million position, while Union Bancaire Privee UBP SA increased its holdings by 253.3%.

Walmart’s 52-week high stands at $135.15. The stock’s 200-day moving average rests at $122.22, a threshold now breached to the downside.

With a 1-year low of $94.23, there’s context for evaluating potential downside if selling momentum persists.

Cryptocurrency ATMs are fast disappearing from the American landscape as kiosk operators in two US states face bans and restrictions as new laws go into effect.

Crypto ATM laws passed by Tennessee and Georgia went into effect on Wednesday, imposing a complete ban in the former and requiring transaction limits and reporting in the latter. The measures by the two states followed bans in Indiana, which went into effect in March, and Minnesota, set to enforce an ATM ban on Aug. 1.

The Tennessee law, signed by Governor Bill Lee in April, bans the use and installation of cryptocurrency ATMs and kiosks, while the Georgia law requires that ATM operators cap money sent for new and existing users, issue warnings to customers and in some cases refund those who may have been the victim of fraud.

There were 185 crypto ATMs and kiosks operating in Tennessee before the statewide ban took effect on July 1. Source: CoinATMRadar

Many US state governments and municipalities have individually begun cracking down on crypto ATM operators in response to incidents of residents, particularly senior citizens, being conned into sending funds to scammers. Delaware and New Jersey lawmakers have proposed similar measures completely banning the machines.

Related: Massachusetts city to weigh crypto ATM ban, citing financial risks

The restrictions may have already contributed to at least one ATM operator going under. In May, Bitcoin Depot filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The company had disclosed just days before that it had “substantial doubts” about its future amid a challenging regulatory environment and lawsuits.

“Bitcoin Depot’s bankruptcy is likely a preview of what the broader crypto ATM industry will face in the US over the next several years,” Roshan Dharia, CEO of Echo Base and a restructuring adviser, told Cointelegraph following the Chapter 11 filing. “The traditional model depended on high transaction spreads and limited regulatory scrutiny to offset unusually high compliance, cash logistics, fraud remediation, and retail revenue sharing costs. That equation is breaking down as states increasingly impose consumer protection standards that compress fees, expand operator liability for scam related activity, and raise expectations around transaction monitoring and reimbursement.”

Canada weighs countrywide ATM ban

Although not in effect yet, federal policymakers in Canada proposed a total ban on crypto ATMs across the country. The proposed policy, which would still allow Canadians to buy digital assets from brick-and-mortar money services businesses, was in response to what officials called the ATMs being the “primary method for scammers to defraud victims and for criminals to place their cash proceeds of crime.”

Magazine: Bitcoin slides to $58K, XRP hits $1 but onchain data promising: Market Moves