Connect with us

Crypto World

Grayscale joins push for CLARITY Act Senate vote as deadline nears

Published

on

Ripple deploys CLARITY truck as Senate delay clouds crypto bill

Grayscale Investments has urged the Senate to vote on the CLARITY Act before the August recess as lawmakers face mounting pressure to resolve disputes holding up the crypto market structure bill.

Summary

  • Grayscale requested a Senate floor vote on the CLARITY Act before lawmakers leave Washington.
  • The bill would divide digital asset oversight between the SEC and CFTC.
  • Ethics restrictions involving federal officials remain a sticking point in bipartisan negotiations.
  • Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has also called for an immediate vote.

Grayscale urges action on the CLARITY Act

Grayscale sent a letter to senators calling for action on the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, or H.R. 3633. The asset manager said hundreds of thousands of Americans hold its digital asset investment products, giving the company and its clients a direct interest in clearer federal rules.

The bill seeks to establish a regulatory framework for digital asset markets and clarify the respective responsibilities of the Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

“Senators and staff across the aisle have spent months addressing hard questions about jurisdiction, investor protections, and developer safeguards,” Grayscale said.

According to the company, the proposed framework would strengthen investor protections while preventing legitimate blockchain developers from facing rules intended for financial intermediaries.

Advertisement

Grayscale argued that crypto businesses, developers and investors need stable rules instead of relying on enforcement actions and agency guidance that can change between administrations.

The company also linked the legislation to regulated crypto investment products. Clearer asset classifications and trading rules could affect the development of exchange-traded funds, exchange-traded products and other vehicles available to U.S. investors.

Senate negotiations face a shrinking deadline

Senators have limited floor time remaining before the August recess, with nominations, government funding discussions and foreign policy measures competing for attention.

Advertisement

Sen. Cynthia Lummis said Senate leaders were still trying to bring the legislation forward before the break. She noted that lawmakers had “one more week here in Washington,” although she acknowledged the crowded schedule.

The House passed its version of the CLARITY Act by a 294–134 vote in July 2025, with 78 Democrats supporting the legislation. Any changes adopted by the Senate would need approval from both chambers before the bill could reach President Donald Trump’s desk.

Senate negotiations have continued over ethics provisions covering digital asset activities involving federal officials. That dispute has complicated efforts to secure enough Democratic support to overcome the chamber’s 60-vote threshold for advancing most legislation.

Republicans hold 53 Senate seats, meaning the bill would likely need support from at least seven Democrats if every Republican voted in favor. Lawmakers have also considered a procedural vote that could establish the timing and rules for further debate.

Advertisement

Bessent adds pressure for an immediate vote

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has joined the campaign for Senate action, calling on lawmakers to vote “NOW” on the CLARITY Act.

Bessent accused Senate Democrats of delaying the measure under pressure from Sen. Elizabeth Warren and other crypto critics. His intervention added support from the Trump administration as negotiators worked to resolve the remaining disagreements.

Ethics enforcement has emerged as one of the main obstacles. A reported proposal from Republican Sen. Thom Tillis and Democratic Sen. Ruben Gallego would allow state authorities to enforce restrictions on federal officials issuing or sponsoring digital tokens.

The proposal would replace an earlier approach that gave the U.S. attorney general sole enforcement authority. Whether that compromise can attract enough bipartisan backing remains uncertain.

Advertisement

US competitiveness becomes part of the debate

Grayscale warned that prolonged uncertainty could push digital asset investment and technical talent toward jurisdictions with more predictable regulations. It cited Singapore and Abu Dhabi as markets that have established clearer frameworks for crypto businesses.

The argument reflects a broader industry effort to frame market structure legislation as an issue of U.S. competitiveness. Supporters say federal rules would give companies more certainty when deciding where to develop products, raise capital and serve customers.

No clear cryptocurrency price movement has been directly linked to Grayscale’s letter. Traders remain focused on whether Senate leaders formally schedule a vote and whether negotiators reach an agreement on ethics restrictions.

Failure to act before the recess would push the debate further into the legislative calendar, where other spending and policy deadlines could make floor time harder to secure. A scheduled vote would signal that Senate leaders believe the bill has enough support to move forward.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Bitcoin braces for August slump as AI stocks falter

Published

on

DOG Mode opens a new front in Bitcoin’s governance fight

Bitcoin price fell below $63,000 on Friday as a short-lived rebound in Asian semiconductor stocks faded, adding pressure as the cryptocurrency entered its historically weak August trading period.

Summary

  • Bitcoin price dropped 3% in 24 hours, extending its weekly loss to about 2%.
  • Samsung and SK Hynix surrendered momentum after surging roughly 25% on Thursday.
  • Bitcoin’s median August return stands near negative 8%, placing $58,000 in focus.
  • The Crypto Fear & Greed Index fell to 25, signaling “Extreme Fear.”

Bitcoin price falls below $63K as risk assets weaken

Bitcoin traded below $63,000 after losing approximately 3% over the previous 24 hours. The decline followed renewed weakness in Asian technology shares, particularly companies tied to the artificial intelligence and semiconductor sectors.

Ethereum fell 2.8% to around $1,860, while Solana declined 2% to approximately $73. XRP traded near $1.06 as selling spread across large-cap cryptocurrencies.

Advertisement

The pullback came one day after Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix rallied roughly 25%, helping South Korea’s KOSPI recover from a steep multiweek decline. That rebound initially suggested investors were returning to semiconductor stocks following heavy selling.

Momentum failed to carry into Friday, however, raising concerns that Thursday’s advance was a temporary relief rally rather than the start of a sustained recovery.

Why faltering AI stocks are weighing on crypto

Crypto assets and AI-related equities have increasingly traded as part of the same risk-sensitive market. Both sectors rely heavily on speculative capital and tend to weaken when investors reduce exposure to high-valuation assets.

Advertisement

Recent pressure on semiconductor stocks has centered on questions about whether AI infrastructure spending can continue at its current pace. Investors are also examining whether future demand for memory chips and computing hardware can support valuations reached during the AI investment boom.

Those concerns are not directly related to Bitcoin’s network or adoption. However, broad risk reduction can still affect crypto as institutional traders rebalance portfolios, reduce leverage and move funds into cash or defensive assets.

For US investors, the next moves in Nvidia and other AI-linked shares could provide an important signal for crypto sentiment. Continued losses across the Nasdaq and semiconductor sector may limit Bitcoin’s ability to recover even without a crypto-specific negative catalyst.

Extreme fear compounds Bitcoin’s August risk

Market sentiment has deteriorated alongside prices. Alternative’s Crypto Fear & Greed Index stood at 25, placing the market in the “Extreme Fear” category. The index was at 28 one week earlier.

Advertisement

CoinGecko category data also showed limited strength across the crypto market. Decentralized finance showed limited relative resilience, but the sector remained under pressure alongside the broader crypto market.

That flat performance suggests investors may be favoring yield-generating or market-neutral DeFi strategies over directional exposure. It does not necessarily indicate that traders expect an immediate market recovery.

Bitcoin’s entry into August adds another risk. Historical data over the past 4 years places its average return for the month near negative 10%, making August one of the cryptocurrency’s weakest calendar periods.

Thin summer liquidity can magnify price swings as participation falls. Traders may also reduce exposure ahead of a month associated with repeated losses, creating additional selling pressure through a self-reinforcing seasonal pattern.

Bitcoin price could test $58K if weakness persists

An 8% decline from Bitcoin’s current level near $63,000 would place the asset around $58,000. That area is likely to attract attention as a possible support zone if selling continues.

Advertisement

A break below $58,000 could expose Bitcoin to a deeper correction, particularly if weak liquidity combines with leveraged long liquidations. Conversely, a recovery above $63,000 would be an early sign that buyers are absorbing supply.

The more important test may come from outside the crypto market. A sustainable floor in AI and semiconductor shares could help restore broader risk appetite, while another sharp decline would increase the likelihood of further pressure on Bitcoin.

Extreme fear has historically appeared near favorable medium-term entry points, but it does not identify an exact market bottom. Bitcoin’s August seasonality, weak technology shares and cautious investor positioning leave the near-term setup tilted toward volatility.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

The Strait of Hormuz Is Exposing a Blind Spot in the Energy Transition

Published

on

The Strait of Hormuz Is Exposing a Blind Spot in the Energy Transition

But, with higher fuel prices eating into airline profits, companies are now poorly positioned to take advantage of the moment. To facilitate SAF production, airlines typically agree to long-term agreements to purchase the fuel. With high levels of geopolitical uncertainty, this is not the moment for executives to commit to a price premium without a regulatory mandate. SAF may sound nice, but it remains unaffordable. 

The refiners who make SAF, on the other hand, are enjoying record profit margins. But they, too, see too much uncertainty as prices fluctuate wildly. On earnings calls this summer they say they are more focused on improving operations and executing existing plans than investing in new projects. 

At a national level, the thinking should be different. SAF is more expensive, but a government can now clearly see the differential as an energy security premium as well as a sustainability advantage. It’s well worth paying to protect the country’s economy in the event of a Hormuz-like situation. 

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Tether Q2 profit hits $1.5B as USDT supply grows

Published

on

Tether USAT launches on Celo as second mainnet

Tether generated approximately $1.5 billion in net operating profit during the second quarter of 2026 as returns from US Treasury holdings and repo operations supported its earnings.

Summary

  • Tether recorded about $1.5 billion in quarterly operating profit, according to its BDO attestation.
  • USDT supply reached approximately $184.6 billion, representing over 60% of the stablecoin market.
  • The company reported $187.7 billion in assets and about $4.1 billion in excess reserves.
  • Tether reduced secured loans by $2.4 billion while adding 14 tons to its gold holdings.

Tether reports $4.1B in excess reserves

Tether’s total assets stood at approximately $187.7 billion at the end of June, while its reported liabilities totaled $183.6 billion. The difference left the stablecoin issuer with roughly $4.1 billion in excess reserves.

The figures appeared in Tether’s latest reserve attestation, prepared by accounting firm BDO and released Friday. US government-backed securities continued to account for the largest portion of the company’s reserve portfolio.

Advertisement

Interest earned from that portfolio, along with returns from repo operations, provided the main source of Tether’s second-quarter profit. The company’s exposure to short-term US debt has made its earnings sensitive to Federal Reserve policy and changes in Treasury yields.

Tether also reported that the circulating supply of USDT reached approximately $184.6 billion by the end of June. Based on the company’s figures, the token controlled more than 60% of the global stablecoin market.

Gold holdings rise as secured lending declines

Tether adjusted the composition of its reserves during the quarter by reducing secured lending and increasing its holdings of physical gold.

Advertisement

Outstanding secured loans fell by about $2.4 billion. Tether did not provide a full breakdown of the borrowers or collateral involved in the lending reduction in the information accompanying the results.

Meanwhile, the company purchased another 14 tons of physical gold, bringing its total holdings to more than 146 tons. The increase continued Tether’s move beyond cash-equivalent reserves and into assets such as gold and Bitcoin.

Tether said its portfolio remained resilient despite sharp price swings affecting both assets during the quarter. Its Bitcoin holdings were valued at approximately $5.8 billion at the end of June.

Those positions may provide additional returns when prices rise, but they also expose part of Tether’s balance sheet to greater market volatility than short-dated US government debt.

Advertisement

US Treasury holdings keep Tether tied to US markets

Tether’s reserve structure gives the company a substantial connection to US financial markets even though USDT operates globally.

The company’s earnings remain heavily influenced by income from US Treasury securities and related repo transactions. Any change in US interest rates could therefore affect future profitability, even if the number of USDT tokens in circulation continues to grow.

Tether is also expanding a separate US-focused stablecoin, USAT. The token recently launched on Celo, its second supported mainnet following Ethereum.

USAT users can mint and redeem the token natively on Celo without relying on third-party bridges. Celo’s CIP-64 upgrade also allows approved ERC-20 tokens to pay network transaction fees, meaning users can use USAT for gas instead of holding a separate token.

Advertisement

The deployment extends Tether’s US-oriented product to a blockchain commonly used for digital-dollar payments. It also separates USAT’s expansion from the company’s larger offshore USDT business.

Tether expands infrastructure beyond stablecoins

Tether said it added more than 30 million users globally during the second quarter while continuing preparations for a full audit by a Big Four accounting firm. It did not provide a completion date for that process.

The company is also exploring tokenized capital-market infrastructure in Africa. Tether and the Nairobi Securities Exchange signed a memorandum of understanding on July 28 covering tokenized securities, blockchain-based market systems and digital asset education in Kenya.

The parties will assess whether USDT could support settlement infrastructure where Kenyan regulations allow. However, the memorandum does not authorize a tokenized security, launch a trading venue or commit the exchange to using USDT.

Advertisement

No pilot date, budget, or binding implementation schedule was disclosed. Future developments will depend on regulatory approval, technical assessments, and whether the exploratory agreement advances into a formal project.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

3 Fed Officials Just Explained Their Rate Hike Vote: Is Inflation Winning?

Published

on

Where the three Fed dissenters agree and where they split. Source: BeInCrypto

Three Fed officials voted for a rate hike on Wednesday. On Friday, they finally said why.

Their answers do not match. Each one wants higher rates for a different reason. That gap is the real story.

Why the Fed Rate Hike Vote Split 9 to 3

The Fed left rates alone on Wednesday. The target range stayed at 3.50% to 3.75%.

Three people on the committee said no. Lorie Logan of Dallas, Neel Kashkari of Minneapolis and Beth Hammack of Cleveland all wanted a quarter point rise. That made it a 9 to 3 split vote.

Advertisement

The vote was public straight away. The thinking behind it was not.

Chair Kevin Warsh told reporters to play the ball, not the referee. He listed what the committee had argued about. He never explained why the majority chose to hold.

The three who lost the vote have now said more than the nine who won it.

Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens

Bond traders had already picked a side. The 30-year Treasury yield closed at its highest level since 2007 on Thursday.

Logan Says Inflation Is Stuck Near 2.5%

Logan’s case is simple. Prices have risen too fast for more than five years. Inflation is not on track to reach 2%.

Strip out one-off supply shocks and better productivity, she says, and inflation still lands in the mid-2s. The risk is that it drifts higher, not lower.

Advertisement

She also thinks today’s rates are not slowing anything down. Jobs look solid. So does spending.

“Without any policy restraint, inflation will likely continue to trend above target until there’s an unanticipated shock. The FOMC cannot count on unanticipated shocks to achieve its goals and can always adjust policy if unanticipated shocks occur,” Logan, statement.

Her fix is small and early. A quarter point now beats a bigger move later.

Same Vote, 3 Different Reasons

Kashkari is not making Logan’s argument. Instead, BeInCrypto reads him as a risk manager. He wants tighter policy because the outlook is so uncertain, not because inflation is proven to be stuck.

Hammack is the third vote. Her own reasoning had not been published at the time of writing.

Advertisement
Where the three Fed dissenters agree and where they split. Source: BeInCrypto
Where the three Fed dissenters agree and where they split. Source: BeInCrypto

Here is why that matters. One shared argument is easy to answer. Three separate arguments are much harder. It looks like the Fed family feud Warsh once said he wanted.

Crypto has already turned. Bitcoin (BTC) rose after Wednesday’s hold. It has since dropped back, trading near $62,600 on Friday, down 3.2% in a day.

Bitcoin Price Performance. Source: BeInCrypto
Bitcoin Price Performance. Source: BeInCrypto

September brings the next meeting. If oil climbs again, the three may not need to win the argument. They may just need one more vote.

The post 3 Fed Officials Just Explained Their Rate Hike Vote: Is Inflation Winning? appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Consensus Is the Last Middleman: The Case for Quantum Money

Published

on

Consensus Is the Last Middleman: The Case for Quantum Money

Quantum computers could one day break Bitcoin (BTC), yet the same physics could also build money that is impossible to forge. Two experts argue that quantum money, not the blockchain, may be the final form of digital cash.

Stefano Gogioso and Daniela Herrmann made the argument during the latest BeInCrypto Experts Council. Their case rests on an idea older than crypto itself, and on a single law of physics.

Money Has Always Been a Story About Trust

A companion analysis asked when quantum computers might break Bitcoin. This piece asks the opposite question. What if the same technology builds something better than the money we use today?

The answer begins with a line from Gogioso that reframes the debate. Consensus, he says, is “the last middleman.”

Advertisement

To see why, it helps to trace how money lost its trust in the first place.

Physical cash needs no middleman. A gold coin proves itself, and a buyer does not have to trust a bank, a ledger, or a network to accept it. Cash, however, cannot travel down a wire.

Digital money solved distance, but it brought the middlemen back. Every online payment now trusts an intermediary to confirm that the same unit is not spent twice.

Bitcoin answered that problem by replacing institutions with math and consensus. Thousands of computers agree on one shared history, so no central party is needed.

Advertisement

The idea of using physics instead of trust, however, is older than Bitcoin. It is older than the modern internet.

In the late 1960s, a Columbia University graduate student named Stephen Wiesner wrote a manuscript called “Conjugate Coding.” Journals rejected it, and it stayed unpublished until 1983.

Wiesner proposed money that could not be counterfeited, protected by physics rather than by a bank. It was the first real use anyone had imagined for quantum information.

That work later inspired the 1984 protocol known as BB84, which launched quantum cryptography. In effect, the whole field grew out of an attempt to make unforgeable money.

Security From Physics, Not Secrecy

Classical cryptography rests on hard math problems. A code stays safe because solving it would take too long. Quantum cryptography works on a different footing.

Advertisement

Its guarantee comes from a physical law called the no-cloning theorem. Physicists William Wootters and Wojciech Zurek proved it in 1982. An unknown quantum state cannot be perfectly copied.

The mechanism is elegant. Any attempt to copy the state disturbs it. The forgery fails, and the tampering shows.

Gogioso has spent years turning that law into working tools. At an earlier BeInCrypto interview in Naples, he described keys that defend themselves. If someone intercepts a quantum key, it is destroyed in transit, and the receiver sees the protocol break.

On the Council panel, he pushed the idea to its limit.

Advertisement

“You can build applications that do not need to trust the very hardware they run on. You can literally commission the hardware from your attacker, and as long as the application passes its self-testing, you are guaranteed security. Worst case, it simply refuses to run. And this is provably impossible classically.”

Specialists call this device-independent cryptography. The security holds even if the manufacturer is hostile. That property matters because complex hardware is exactly where backdoors tend to hide.

Why Unforgeable Keys Become Money

The step from security to money is short. Cheating and forgery are the same problem in different words.

If you cannot copy a quantum state, you cannot counterfeit it. And a thing that cannot be counterfeited can serve as money.

Gogioso drew the line directly.

Advertisement

“A different way of saying you cannot cheat is saying you cannot copy or forge. From the very same family of techniques, you get quantum money, or quantum financial instruments. New ways of doing digital finance with far fewer trust assumptions on intermediaries, networks, and counterparties.”

His team has already built the smallest version of the concept. In Naples, he demonstrated keys that work only once. To spend one, you have to destroy it, which stops an attacker from replaying an old payment.

A single-use key is a tiny piece of unforgeable value. Scale that principle up, and you reach what researchers call quantum money.

The theory is not new. In 2012, Scott Aaronson and Paul Christiano proposed the first public-key quantum money scheme. It lets anyone verify a note, not only the bank that issued it. Their framing echoed Wiesner almost exactly, describing money that cannot be counterfeited according to the laws of physics.

Quantum Money and the Last Middleman

Now the pieces meet. Bitcoin removed the banks, but it did not remove trust. It shifted that trust onto a network and a shared ledger. Something still has to agree on which payments are real.

Advertisement

Gogioso views that agreement as the final intermediary. Web3 and zero-knowledge tools clawed back some of the trust that digital money gave away, he says, yet consensus still does the last job of preventing forgery.

That job carries a cost. Consensus demands coordination, energy, and a crowd of participants who must broadly agree. A physical guarantee needs none of those things.

Quantum money, in his telling, removes the middleman completely.

“Quantum money is the next and final evolution of that story. You recover something digital that you can transact at a distance, but without trusting intermediaries, global ledgers, or someone deciding which transactions go into an Ethereum (ETH) block. The physics gives you the unforgeability directly. In that sense, consensus is truly the last middleman.”

The claim is large, so it is worth stating plainly. If it holds, quantum money would be to Bitcoin what Bitcoin was to the bank.

Advertisement

There is a symmetry worth noting. The physics that threatens Bitcoin’s signatures is the same physics that could retire the need for consensus altogether.

The One Defense That Survives Smarter Attackers

There is a further reason the timing matters. Artificial intelligence is getting better at breaking things.

Most security today assumes the attacker is not clever enough, or that a problem is simply too hard to solve in time. Gogioso argues that this assumption looks fragile in an age of capable AI.

Physics offers a different kind of promise.

“What quantum really buys you is security based on the laws of the universe. It doesn’t matter how smart the AI is. You can’t break it. Worst case, you can stop it from happening, but you cannot forge it.”

That is the deeper appeal of the approach. A quantum guarantee does not depend on the attacker’s limits. It depends on the structure of reality, which no amount of intelligence can rewrite.

Advertisement

Quantum Money: Not Here Yet, but Within Reach

Both guests were careful not to oversell the idea. Herrmann, whose firm builds commercial quantum tools, marked the boundary clearly.

“Quantum money is the vision, once this all plays out. Right now, quantum money as such isn’t available yet. But as soon as the chips advance, these things have to be handled with real responsibility.”

The main obstacle is quantum memory. Holding a fragile quantum state is difficult, and today the best systems keep one for only seconds. Gogioso has said that the limit still puts full quantum money out of reach, though the same hardware already suits short-lived tasks.

Even so, the direction is set. Laboratory experiments have begun to demonstrate quantum tokens and related schemes, moving the idea off the page.

Gogioso closed the panel on that note.

Advertisement

“Within five, six, seven years we could live in a world where we use quantum resources to do things that are provably impossible today. Not just hard, not just slow, actually impossible. And this is software we can start building today, not in five years. The future is absolutely within reach.”

More than half a century after Wiesner sketched money that physics itself would guard, the idea is finally leaving the whiteboard. If Gogioso and Herrmann are right, the last middleman may not survive the decade.

The post Consensus Is the Last Middleman: The Case for Quantum Money appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

America’s Best Private Companies of 2026

Published

on

America's Best Private Companies of 2026

Now, younger generations entering the workforce are less drawn to big companies than the generations prior. They factor in wellness outside of work in addition to salary. “They really care about their family, life issues; whether their work will be valuable to their own life. In that sense private companies might be a better place because they can design their own purpose,” Lee says. In this trend, they may also be interested in alternative organization structures like employee-owned companies or worker cooperatives, which have been growing in popularity, with the federal government even encouraging more employers to adopt such models. Southern staple Publix (no. 9) and warehouse chain WinCo (no. 10) are both employee-owned through an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP). 

“Usually, employee-owned companies have higher productivity, their revenue growth is usually 3-4% higher than other companies, and then their quit rate is about a third of other companies,” Lee says. “These numbers always show that employees are very actively engaged in their own company, because their perspective is more long term. … These are motivational incentives for employee owners to make their companies better, and perform better, and that could impact their retirement.” On the other hand, worker cooperatives benefit from “a lot of diverse opinions and comments and insight that really makes their corporate strategy different than other competitors,” Lee says.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitcoin (BTC) price’s July gain survives hawkish Fed, AI meltdown and Coldcard fallout

Published

on

Bitcoin (BTC) price's July gain survives hawkish Fed, AI meltdown and Coldcard fallout

Since then, average daily liquidations have remained well below this year’s typical $400 million-$500 million range, suggesting there has been little forced selling despite the macro shock, according to Bitfinex.

“Crypto fell less than levered equity themes because the forced-selling fuel was already spent,” the analysts wrote.

Security concerns linger

Separately, the market is also digesting the fallout from a major exploit involving Coldcard, which resulted in at least $38 million worth of bitcoin being stolen.

The incident hasn’t materially affected price action, but it marked another blowback as digital asset-related exploits have surged and reignited debate around risks of self-custody, one of crypto’s fundamental promises.

Advertisement

“The proceeds haven’t yet been liquidated, but the knock-on effect of this and the likelihood of liquidation will weigh on bitcoin pricing in the near term,” said Paul Howard, director at trading firm Wincent. More broadly, he said, the exploit highlights the operational risks that continue to accompany self-custody.

Read more: Coldcard’s $38 million (so far) exploit shakes faith in self-custody, may push investors to ETFs

Eyes on jobs data and ETF flows

Looking ahead, macro uncertainty remains the dominant theme.

Jeff Anderson, managing partner at STS Digital, said markets may be entering “a new volatility regime” as investors swing between expectations for rate cuts, pauses and hikes. That uncertainty, he said, is likely to keep pressure on high-beta assets such as bitcoin until the economic outlook becomes clearer.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

UNI Just Hit a 6-Month High as Uniswap Rolls Out New Token Discovery Tab

Published

on

UNI rose 13% over the past 24 hours and reached $4.54 – a level not seen since January this year. The latest rally has lifted the asset’s gains over the past month to 60%.

The move came as Uniswap announced Launches in beta, a new tab on its Web App for discovering top token offerings. For now, Robinhood Chain is the first network featured in the new tab, but more networks are expected to be included.

New Tab Debuts

Uniswap said launchpad builders such as Bankr, Pons, Long, and others are using the platform as their trading infrastructure. The company added that Launches will give these projects more distribution. The feature currently includes token releases on Robinhood Chain, with more to come.

According to the platform’s stats, more than 340,000 new tokens launched into Uniswap across Robinhood launchpads in July alone. These collectively generated $3.6 billion in trading volume.

Advertisement

The new Launches tab pulls tokens from top launchpads into a single feed. Users can filter these or sort by 24-hour volume, liquidity, recently debuted, or trending.

The burn was another notable development for UNI this week, as 106,000 units were destroyed on July 29. That comes as the protocol faces renewed debate over its v4 fee structure. Some community members raised concerns that protocol fees could reduce returns for liquidity providers and push liquidity toward competing exchanges.

Uniswap founder Hayden Adams pushed back against what he called the “FUD and misunderstanding: around the changes. He said the new protocol fees are additive, meaning liquidity providers would continue earning the same 30 basis points on a 30bp pool. He also rejected claims that the protocol would take 25% of LP profits, and explained that a 5bp protocol fee on a 30bp pool amounts to about 14% of total swap fees, not LP earnings that already existed.

Adams also argued that the 5bp fee is significantly lower than the 100-200bp fees charged by centralized exchanges.

Advertisement

Zooming Out

The protocol has also been caught up in a wider wave of crypto scams targeting users through fake websites. Earlier this year, a fake Uniswap website was draining funds from crypto wallets. Experts warned that scammers had stolen at least $400,000. Users were advised to use only official links and verify protocols through DeFiLlama.

The warning followed a broader report from security group SEAL, which found a sharp rise in malicious Google Ads targeting crypto users. SEAL blocked more than 356 malicious ad URLs tied to scams impersonating Uniswap and other major platforms.

Interestingly, Uniswap was the most impersonated, as it accounted for 41% of tracked malicious sites. Losses linked to the campaigns exceeded $1.27 million between March 13 and March 30.

The post UNI Just Hit a 6-Month High as Uniswap Rolls Out New Token Discovery Tab appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

TIPS challenge the inflation story behind rising bond yields

Published

on

TIPS challenge the inflation story behind rising bond yields

Key points: 

  • Bond yields have been going up since the beginning of the Iran war, widely attributed to inflation expectations due to energy prices
  • However, the five-year inflation expectation priced into Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities is 2.2% and trending down since May
  • The driver appears to be rising real yields with bearish implications for yield-free assets like Bitcoin 

Continuation of Q2 bond selling

After yields reached local lows in early March, US government debt has been undergoing a multi-month sell-off. This week, after the most recent meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), 30-year Treasury yields made headlines by reaching the highest level since 2007. 

In line with the two-year yield rising 76 basis points (bps) in this window, a September rate hike by the Federal Reserve is priced into the markets at 63%, according to CME FedWatch.

2Y, 10Y and 30Y US Treasury Yields. Data Source: Treasury.gov

With rates at these elevated levels, government bond investments are, for the first time since 2019, more profitable than cash-and-carry trades in the crypto markets, as per Glassnode’s latest research

Advertisement

2Y US Treasury yield and crypto futures carry trade. Source: Glassnode

The mainstream inflation narrative

The reason for the bond sell-off is commonly taken to be the inflationary pressures from higher commodity and energy prices. The multi-month bond sell-off coincides with the start of the Iran war and resulting closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Furthermore, the daily closes of the two-year US government bond yield, West Texas Intermediate (WTI) and Brent Crude have correlated since March at a coefficient of r=0.44:

Daily closes of WTI and Brent Crude against 2Y Yield. Data Sources: fred.stlouisfed.org, EIA

WTI briefly rose once again above $85 a barrel on Thursday after President Donald Trump threatened Iran and bonds sold off leading into the FOMC. Nothing about the conflict suggests a near-term resolution, which has led some to argue that higher rates are being caused by inflation expectations.

Advertisement

WTI (West Texas Intermediate) oil price chart. Source: Tradingeconomics.com

This has driven loud inflation scares through the mainstream financial press, with recent Bloomberg headlines, such as “Global Bonds Are Reeling as Oil Surge Rekindles Inflation Threat”, “US Yields Hit Two-Month High as Oil Sparks Inflation Risk” or “Global Bond Selloff Worsens as Rising Oil Prices Spook Investors”. Among the ever-inflation-aware crypto and precious metals audience, this narrative is popular, too: 

Market commentator and Bitcoin influencer The Wolf of All Streets recently posted on X:

However, the way other Treasury securities trade does not support the inflation-driven narrative for bond yields.

Advertisement

TIPS say rate rises are ‘real’

While most analysts and commentators focus on regular Treasury yields for their analysis, Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities, or TIPS, have offered clear signs against the inflation narrative.

A Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) is an ordinary treasury bond for which the principal payment is adjusted upward in line with the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U). In addition to the inflation-protected principal, each TIPS carries a fixed coupon rate. Thus, unlike for a regular bond, both principal and interest payments are inflation-adjusted.

By comparing the yield of a TIPS with a regular, equally dated Treasury, the expectation of future CPI inflation can be estimated as the so-called breakeven rate. And although Treasury yields have been rising, the five-year breakeven rate has gone down sharply since May. 

Five-year breakeven inflation rate. Source: fred.stlouisfed.org

Advertisement

At roughly 2.2%, the five-year breakeven expects the Fed to achieve its 2% target in the medium term. However, more telling is that the breakeven rate has been moving in the opposite direction to the nominal treasury yields.

While the five-year nominal yield rose 33 bps, TIPS data suggests this was the result of an 84 bps rise in the real yield, partially offset by a 51 bps decline in expected inflation. While the inflation narrative remains a compelling story, the marketplace says otherwise. The real story ought to be a rise in real yields. 

What it may mean for crypto

Generally, rising “real” investment returns on bonds and stocks in terms of CPI make non-yielding assets such as Bitcoin relatively less attractive to certain investors. Beyond this, the impact on the crypto market depends on the explanation for higher real rates, of which several are available. 

Reserve liquidation — No clear impact on Crypto. Higher oil prices widen trade deficits for Asian energy importers. As oil is generally priced and settled in US dollars, shortages in the local eurodollar markets in Asia have occurred, which has put their exchange rates under pressure. The Japanese yen (JPY), Philippine peso (PHP) and Indian rupee (RBI) have all required central bank intervention to defend their exchange rates. As these measures are funded by the sale of US Treasury reserves, this puts upward pressure on bond yields. HSBC’s Frederic Neumann is on record attributing the bond sell-off to FX pressure rather than a verdict on the dollar.

Advertisement

Demand destruction — Bearish for Crypto. An oil shock that persists long enough stops being inflationary and starts triggering a recession. Neuberger Berman argued in its second-quarter outlook that investors are underpricing the hit to output from sustained energy prices. The credit contraction that coincides with a recession would be bad for equities and Bitcoin by severely restricting liquidity. In a real sign of recessionary credit events, credit spreads are expected to widen. Cointelegraph reported on possible first signs of this on Wednesday.

Related: Cost to insure AI debt reaches record high amid Asian semiconductor tumble

Investment demand — Likely bearish for Crypto. Real rates may have also responded to expected growth and the demand for capital from the AI sector. Government bond issuance is increasingly competing with the record issuance of corporate bonds from AI hyperscalers. Goldman Sachs Research projects roughly $755 billion of AI capex in 2026 and about $920 billion in 2027. UBS has raised its 2026 investment-grade issuance forecast to $1.8 trillion, with technology supply lifted to $360 billion on hyperscaler guidance. As crypto is competing for a similar pool of capital and investor cohort, this is likely to suppress the sector.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Wall Street Rushes to Raise Amazon Targets After 15% Post-Earnings Stock Surge

Published

on

Amazon (AMZN) Stock Performance

Amazon (AMZN) stock jumped 15.32% on Friday and closed at $271.58. Within hours, more than a dozen banks raised their price targets on it.

The trigger was Amazon’s second quarter report, published July 30. Its cloud business grew much faster than Wall Street expected.

Amazon (AMZN) Stock Performance
Amazon (AMZN) Stock Performance. Source: Yahoo Finance

What Set Off the Amazon Price Target Race

Amazon sold $200.6 billion of goods and services in the quarter. That is 19.6% more than a year ago. Analysts had expected $197.0 billion. Profit came in at $5.75 per share, against forecasts near $1.81.

One number mattered most. Amazon Web Services, the company’s cloud arm, grew 36.8% to $42.2 billion. That was its fastest growth in 18 quarters, or about four and a half years. The Q2 earnings beat had already lifted the stock 8.85% after hours.

Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens

Advertisement

Benchmark Now Sees Amazon at $400

Benchmark analyst Daniel Kurnos raised his target to $400 from $370 and kept a Buy rating.

He called it one of Amazon’s best quarters in at least 10 years. He has followed the company for close to 20 years.

JPMorgan went to $365 from $330. It pointed to Amazon’s cloud backlog, meaning work customers have committed to but not yet used.

That backlog hit $496 billion. It is roughly 2.5 times the level of a year ago. Rosenblatt moved up to $345. TD Cowen, Truist and KeyBanc each landed on $350.

Advertisement

Telsey Advisory Group said $335. Mizuho and RBC Capital said $330. Wolfe Research and Citizens both stayed at $315.

The Cash Problem Nobody Solved

Benchmark attached a warning to its own upgrade. Amazon is burning cash, and it has not explained how it plans to fund everything.

Free cash flow is the money left over after a company pays its bills and builds its facilities. Over the past 12 months, Amazon spent $7.6 billion more than it brought in. A year earlier it had $18.2 billion to spare.

Chief Executive Andy Jassy now plans to spend about $220 billion this year on data centers and chips. Memory prices have climbed. Filings showed AI spending draining cash at every big cloud provider before this week.

Advertisement

Not Every Stock Got This Treatment

Goldman Sachs, Barclays and Jefferies cut Robinhood price targets a day earlier. Robinhood had also beaten forecasts.

Cantor Fitzgerald trimmed its Amazon target to $320. It changed how it values the stock but kept an Overweight rating.

Wolfe Research prices Amazon at 30 times its expected 2027 profit. The stock currently trades near 24.5 times.

Amazon expects sales of $197 billion to $202 billion next quarter. That hands the stocks to watch crowd a checkpoint in August.

Advertisement

The $400 call rests on one thing. Amazon has to turn that $220 billion of spending into cash.

The post Wall Street Rushes to Raise Amazon Targets After 15% Post-Earnings Stock Surge appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025