Crypto World
Has BTC bottomed at $60K?
Bitcoin has fallen to around $60,000, more than half off its all-time high, with the Fear and Greed Index in extreme fear and momentum near oversold. Is this the bottom before the next leg higher, or a pause on the way to $55,000 and lower? Here is what the charts, the 4-year cycle, and the analysts actually say.
Summary
- Bitcoin trades near $60,000 as of late June 2026, down roughly 18% on the month and about 52% below its all-time high near $126,000 set late last year.
- The bottom case rests on extreme fear, oversold momentum, support holding near $58,000, and structural demand from ETFs and corporate treasuries.
- The lower case rests on a broken technical structure below every major moving average, a late-cycle position historically tied to deep corrections, and a loss of $58,000 opening $55,000 and below.
- The single most important level is the 50-month exponential moving average near $65,600; reclaiming it on a monthly close would shift the picture, while failure keeps sellers in control.
- Analyst year-end targets span an enormous range, from the low-$40,000s in bearish models to $180,000 and beyond from prominent bulls, which tells you how unsettled the outcome is.
Bitcoin (BTC) is trading near $60,000 as of late June 2026, and the question dividing traders is simple to state and hard to answer: is this the bottom, or is there more pain to come? The price sits roughly 52% below the all-time high near $126,000 reached late last year, down about 18% over the past month, with the Crypto Fear and Greed Index mired in extreme fear at a reading around 18 and the relative strength index near 31, close to the oversold zone.
Bitcoin price is stuck below the 50-month exponential moving average near $65,600, a level that has historically separated Bitcoin bull markets from bear markets, and the immediate support that bulls are defending sits near $58,100, with $55,000 the next major shelf below that. This is the kind of moment that defines cycles.
Either extreme fear and oversold momentum mark a durable low from which Bitcoin recovers, as they often have before, or the late-cycle structure resolves lower in the classic post-halving correction that history warns about. Both outcomes have serious advocates and serious evidence, and the honest answer is that the setup is genuinely balanced rather than obvious in either direction.
This article works through the question from every angle a serious trader would weigh: where Bitcoin actually stands on the charts, the strongest version of the case that $60,000 is the bottom, the strongest version of the case that $55,000 or lower is next, the specific price levels that will confirm one path or the other, where Bitcoin sits in its 4-year halving cycle and whether that framework still applies, what the major analysts are forecasting and why their numbers diverge so wildly, and finally three concrete scenarios for the rest of 2026. The aim is not to tell you what Bitcoin will do, because nobody can, but to lay out what each outcome requires so that you can watch the right signals and form your own view.
The forecasts that follow are information, not advice, and the spread among them is itself the most honest summary of where Bitcoin stands: deeply uncertain, at a level that will look in hindsight like either a generational entry or a bull trap, with the evidence today pointing both ways.
Where Bitcoin stands right now
Start with the unvarnished technical picture, because it frames everything else. Bitcoin near $60,000 is in a confirmed downtrend on the higher timeframes. It trades below the 50-month exponential moving average near $65,600, the level many long-term traders treat as the dividing line between bull and bear regimes, and well below shorter-term averages such as the 20-month exponential moving average near $80,000, which shows how far price has fallen from its recent range. The monthly candle is down sharply, around 18%, and the broader drawdown from the $126,000 peak is about 52%, a decline consistent in scale with past Bitcoin bear phases.
Momentum is weak: the monthly relative strength index sits near 31, at the lower boundary that has historically marked important bottoms but which can also stay depressed while price grinds lower. Composite technical readouts across the major analytics platforms lean bearish, with the clear majority of tracked indicators flashing sell signals rather than buy signals.
Sentiment matches the price action. The Fear and Greed Index reads around 18, deep in extreme fear, the zone where past panic-driven selling has often exhausted itself and set up rebounds, though extreme fear can also persist through further declines when a real bear market is underway.
The key support structure is well defined, which is useful: immediate support sits near $58,100, and a decisive loss of that level would expose $55,000 and then lower shelves beneath it. On the upside, the first hurdle is reclaiming the 50-month average near $65,600 on a monthly closing basis, which would be the earliest technical sign that the worst is over. Until that happens, the structure favors sellers, and the burden of proof sits with the bulls.
None of this resolves the bottom question by itself, but it maps the terrain: oversold, fearful, below the key line, defending support, with a clear level overhead that needs to be reclaimed before any recovery can be called real.
The case that $60,000 is the bottom
The bottom thesis is not wishful thinking; it rests on a coherent set of signals. The first is sentiment as a contrarian indicator. The Fear and Greed Index at extreme-fear levels has, in Bitcoin history, frequently coincided with major lows, because by the time fear reaches these readings, the holders most inclined to sell in panic have largely done so, leaving a market with less downside fuel.
The 2nd is momentum. A monthly relative strength index near 31 is close to the oversold threshold that has historically preceded recoveries, and on the weekly timeframe some analysts note RSI approaching levels that have marked important bottoms in past cycles, suggesting the correction is closer to its end than its beginning. The 3rd is the price structure itself: Bitcoin is defending support near $58,100, and as long as that floor holds on a closing basis, the bottoming case remains technically intact.
The deeper support for the bottom thesis is structural demand that did not exist in earlier cycles. Spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds now hold very large quantities of Bitcoin, on the order of well over 1 million coins across the complex, and corporate treasuries continue to accumulate, with some holdings approaching levels that rival the largest known wallets. This persistent, price-insensitive buying provides a demand floor that earlier Bitcoin bear markets lacked, and bulls argue it changes the math of how low Bitcoin can realistically fall before institutional buyers step in.
Layer on the regulatory tailwind, with clearer United States rules advancing through the digital-commodity framework, and the bull case is that Bitcoin near $60,000 is being offered at a steep discount precisely when its structural demand base is the strongest it has ever been. In this reading, extreme fear plus oversold momentum plus a record institutional bid equals a bottom, and the people selling here are handing cheap coins to long-term accumulators. It is a serious argument backed by real flows, not merely hope.
The case that $55,000 or lower is next
The bearish thesis is equally coherent and arguably has the cleaner technical structure behind it right now. The starting point is that Bitcoin trades below every major moving average that matters, from the 50-month exponential average near $65,600 on down, and price below falling long-term averages is the textbook definition of a downtrend, not a bottom. Extreme fear and oversold momentum, the bears note, are necessary but not sufficient for a low; in genuine bear markets, both conditions can persist for months while price keeps sliding, and a reading of extreme fear is just as consistent with the middle of a decline as with its end.
The support at $58,100 is the line in the sand, and a weekly close below it would, on this view, confirm further downside and bring $55,000 into focus, with little structural support between there and lower levels once that shelf breaks.
The macro and cyclical context reinforces the bearish read. Bitcoin is roughly 26 months past the April 2024 halving, which places it deep in the late-cycle phase that has historically followed the halving with a peak and then a substantial correction.
If the cycle top was the $126,000 high reached late last year, then a 52% drawdown is well within the range of past bear-market declines, and history would suggest the correction could run deeper and longer before a true bottom forms. Bears also point to the risk that the very institutional structures bulls celebrate could amplify a decline: leveraged corporate Bitcoin treasuries that bought at higher prices may face pressure to sell if their financing terms or share valuations deteriorate, and ETF flows that were a tailwind on the way up can reverse into outflows that remove the demand floor exactly when it is needed.
In this reading, $60,000 is not a bottom but a way station; the support break to $55,000 is the more probable next move, and the late-cycle clock argues for patience over bottom-fishing.
The levels that will settle it
Rather than guess, traders can watch a specific ladder of levels that will confirm which thesis is playing out, and this is where the abstract debate becomes concrete. On the downside, the first decisive level is $58,100. A clean weekly or monthly close below it would invalidate the immediate bottoming case and open the door to $55,000, which is the next significant shelf. Below $55,000, the structure thins out, and a loss there would suggest the broader bear phase has further to run, with traders then watching round-number psychological levels and prior-cycle reference points beneath. The bears need that $58,100 break to confirm their case; until it happens, the lower targets remain hypothetical.
On the upside, the levels are equally clear. The first and most important is the 50-month exponential moving average near $65,600. A monthly close back above it would be the earliest serious signal that the downtrend is ending, because reclaiming that bull-bear line has historically preceded recoveries. Above it, the next hurdles are the 200-day moving average near $65,200, which sits close by, and then the 20-month average near $80,000, a reclaim of which would signal a genuine trend change instead of a relief bounce. The bulls need that $65,600 monthly close to confirm their case; a rejection there would keep the structure bearish even if price bounces in the meantime.
The practical takeaway is that the bottom question will be answered not by sentiment or narrative but by which of these levels gives way first. Hold $58,100 and reclaim $65,600, and the bottom case strengthens decisively. Lose $58,100, and $55,000 becomes the conversation. Everything between is noise.
The 4-year cycle and where Bitcoin sits in it
No Bitcoin price discussion is complete without the halving cycle, and right now it cuts toward caution while raising a genuine question about whether the old framework still holds. Bitcoin’s supply issuance halves roughly every 4 years, and the April 2024 halving cut the block reward to 3.125 coins. Historically, the 12 to 18 months after a halving have produced the cycle’s price peak, followed by a deep correction into the next cycle’s accumulation phase. Bitcoin is now around 26 months past that halving, which places it firmly in the late-cycle window where, in past cycles, the top was already in, and a correction was underway or complete. If history rhymes, the $126,000 high late last year was the cycle peak, and the current drawdown is the correction phase, which historically has run deep before bottoming. That reading supports patience and the lower-price case.
But there is a serious counterargument that this cycle may not behave like the past ones, and it is the crux of the most important debate in Bitcoin right now. The arrival of spot ETFs, large corporate treasuries, and institutional adoption has injected a new kind of demand that did not exist in earlier cycles, and some analysts argue this could either smooth out the 4-year pattern, blunting both the euphoric tops and the brutal bottoms, or extend the cycle by adding sustained buying that delays the peak. If the cycle is being stretched or dampened by institutionalization, then late-cycle timing alone is a weaker guide than it used to be, and a drawdown to $60,000 could be a mid-cycle shakeout instead of the start of a multi-year bear market.
The honest position is that nobody yet knows whether the 4-year cycle still governs Bitcoin or whether institutionalization has changed the rules, and that uncertainty is precisely why the bottom question is so contested. The cycle clock says caution; the structural-demand argument says this time may differ. Both could be partly right.
What the analysts are forecasting
The dispersion among professional forecasts is wide enough to be its own data point, and it reflects exactly the unresolved debate this article describes. On the bullish side, Ripple chief executive Brad Garlinghouse has pointed to $180,000 for Bitcoin in 2026 on favorable market and regulatory conditions, and Bitwise chief investment officer Matt Hougan has reiterated a $200,000 target for the year, while acknowledging he did not expect the scale of selling that hit the market on the way down.
More structured institutional views are more measured but still constructive: the head of research at CoinShares has projected Bitcoin holding a $120,000 to $170,000 range across 2026 with stronger action in the 2nd half, and Carol Alexander has described a high-volatility band of $75,000 to $150,000 with a central tendency near $110,000.
Longer-term, Bitwise has floated $500,000 as Bitcoin approaches a share of gold’s market value, and various quantitative models, from stock-to-flow to power-law frameworks, sit anywhere from $100,000 to well above $250,000.
Against those stand the cautious and bearish models. Algorithmic forecasters such as CoinCodex read the 2026 setup as bearish on technical indicators, and model-based ranges from sources like CoinLore place 2026 anywhere from the low-$40,000s at the bottom to roughly $118,000 at the top, depending on conditions, with near-term projections clustering close to current levels. The sheer gap, from a low-$40,000s downside to a $200,000-plus upside within the same year, is not a sign that forecasters are careless; it reflects that Bitcoin’s 2026 path depends on variables that genuinely could break either way, chiefly ETF flows, macro liquidity and Federal Reserve policy, and whether the 4-year cycle reasserts itself.
When the credible range is this wide, the responsible conclusion is not to pick a number but to recognize that the outcome is unusually open, and to size risk accordingly. The analysts are not telling you where Bitcoin is going; collectively, they are telling you it is a genuine coin-flip at a decision point.
What would confirm a bottom, and what would break it
Pulling the threads together, a real bottom would announce itself through a recognizable cluster of signals instead of a single one. Technically, it would start with $58,100 holding on a closing basis, followed by a monthly close back above the 50-month average near $65,600, ideally on rising volume that shows real buying instead of a low-conviction bounce. Fundamentally, it would coincide with ETF flows turning consistently positive again after any period of outflows, since that institutional bid is the demand floor the bull case depends on, and it would likely be helped by a supportive macro shift, such as the Federal Reserve easing policy or broad liquidity improving, conditions under which risk assets like Bitcoin tend to recover. A stabilization or reversal in Bitcoin dominance and a lift in sentiment off extreme-fear lows would round out the confirmation. If those align, the case that $60,000 marked the low becomes strong.
The breakdown scenario is the mirror image. It would begin with a decisive loss of $58,100, opening $55,000 and then lower levels with little support beneath, and it would be reinforced by ETF flows turning to sustained outflows that remove the demand floor. The macro trigger would be tightening conditions, a stronger dollar, or a broad risk-off episode that pulls capital out of speculative assets.
The cyclical trigger would be confirmation that the 4-year pattern is intact and the late-cycle correction has further to run. And a specific structural risk worth watching is forced selling from leveraged Bitcoin treasury companies, whose need to sell into weakness could amplify a decline well beyond what spot demand alone would produce.
The practical discipline for anyone navigating this is to treat $58,100 as the hinge: above it, with $65,600 reclaimed, the bottom case has the upper hand; below it, the lower targets become the base case. Watching those levels and those flows beats guessing, because the market itself will signal which path it has chosen.
Three scenarios for Bitcoin into late 2026
Synthesizing the evidence into scenarios makes the range concrete without pretending to certainty.
In the bull scenario, $60,000 proves to be the cycle low or close to it. Support at $58,100 holds, extreme fear and oversold momentum mark the exhaustion of selling, ETF inflows resume, and a supportive macro turn lets Bitcoin reclaim the 50-month average near $65,600 and then push back toward and beyond $80,000 over the 2nd half of 2026, validating the more constructive analyst targets and putting 6-figure prices back in view into 2027. This scenario leans on the structural-demand argument and the possibility that institutionalization has changed the cycle, and it is the path the prominent bulls like Hougan and Garlinghouse are forecasting toward.
In the base scenario, Bitcoin chops in a wide, volatile range without a clean resolution for some time. It defends the low-$58,000s to $60,000 area more often than not but struggles to reclaim $65,600 decisively, spending the rest of 2026 oscillating between roughly the mid-$50,000s and the mid-$70,000s as bulls and bears fight over the cycle question, with the outcome unresolved into 2027. This middle path fits the high-volatility ranges that measured analysts like Carol Alexander and CoinShares describe, and it is arguably the most likely outcome given how balanced the evidence is.
In the bear scenario, the late-cycle correction reasserts itself. Bitcoin loses $58,100, slides to $55,000 and then lower, ETF flows reverse, treasury-company selling amplifies the move, and the 4-year cycle plays out classically with a deeper and longer bottoming process that drags into 2027 before a new accumulation phase begins, validating the bearish models that see the low-$40,000s as a real possibility. Which scenario unfolds depends on the levels and flows described above, and the only intellectually honest stance today is that all 3 are live.
Frequently Asked Questions
Has Bitcoin bottomed at $60,000?
It is truly unresolved. The bottom case rests on extreme fear, oversold momentum near a monthly RSI of 31, support holding near $58,100, and record structural demand from ETFs and corporate treasuries. The lower case rests on Bitcoin trading below every major moving average, a late-cycle position around 26 months past the April 2024 halving that historically precedes deeper corrections, and the risk that a loss of $58,100 opens $55,000 and below. The deciding signal is whether Bitcoin holds $58,100 and reclaims the 50-month average near $65,600 on a monthly close. Until then, neither side is confirmed, and the evidence points both ways.
What is the key level to watch for Bitcoin?
The 50-month exponential moving average near $65,600 is the single most important level, treated by many long-term traders as the line between bull and bear regimes; a monthly close above it would be the earliest serious sign the downtrend is ending. On the downside, $58,100 is the critical support, and a decisive close below it would expose $55,000 and lower. The 200-day moving average near $65,200 sits close to the 50-month average and reinforces that zone, while the 20-month average near $80,000 is the level a true trend change would need to reclaim. Watch $58,100 as the hinge and $65,600 as the confirmation.
Why is Bitcoin down so much from its high?
Bitcoin is about 52% below its all-time high near $126,000 reached late last year, having fallen roughly 18% in the past month alone. The decline reflects a combination of factors: a late-cycle position about 26 months past the April 2024 halving, the phase that has historically followed the halving peak with a correction; weakening momentum and sentiment, with the Fear and Greed Index in extreme fear; and macro pressures including liquidity conditions and uncertainty about Federal Reserve policy. Whether this is a normal cyclical correction or the start of a deeper bear market is exactly the question dividing analysts, and it depends heavily on whether ETF and institutional demand offsets the cyclical downdraft.
What are analysts predicting for Bitcoin in 2026?
The range is extremely wide, which reflects real uncertainty. Bullish forecasts include $180,000 from Ripple’s Brad Garlinghouse and $200,000 from Bitwise’s Matt Hougan, with longer-term calls like Bitwise’s $500,000 tied to Bitcoin taking share from gold. More measured institutional views include CoinShares at $120,000 to $170,000 for the year and Carol Alexander’s $75,000 to $150,000 band centering near $110,000. Cautious and bearish models run lower, with ranges extending into the low-$40,000s in weak scenarios. The gap from the low-$40,000s to above $200,000 within 1 year shows that the outcome depends on variables, chiefly ETF flows, macro liquidity, and the cycle, that truly could break either way.
Could Bitcoin fall to $55,000 or lower?
Yes, it is a real possibility if support breaks. The bearish path runs through a decisive loss of $58,100, which would open $55,000 as the next major level, with thin support beneath it once that shelf gives way. The case is reinforced by Bitcoin trading below all major moving averages, the late-cycle timing that historically precedes deeper corrections, the risk of ETF flows reversing into outflows, and the specific danger of forced selling from leveraged corporate Bitcoin treasuries that bought higher. Bearish models see the low-$40,000s as possible in a weak 2026. Whether it happens hinges on the $58,100 support; as long as that holds on a closing basis, the lower targets remain hypothetical.
Is the 4-year cycle still valid for Bitcoin?
This is one of the most important open debates in Bitcoin right now. The traditional pattern, in which price peaks roughly a year or so after each halving and then corrects deeply, would place Bitcoin in a late-cycle correction now, around 26 months past the April 2024 halving, and argues for caution. But the arrival of spot ETFs, corporate treasuries, and broad institutional adoption has introduced sustained demand that did not exist in earlier cycles, which some analysts argue could smooth out the pattern, blunting both tops and bottoms, or stretch the cycle by delaying the peak. Nobody yet knows whether the cycle still governs Bitcoin or whether institutionalization has changed the rules, and that uncertainty is central to why the current bottom question is so contested.
This article is information, not financial or investment advice. Bitcoin price levels, indicator readings, and analyst forecasts reflect data available as of June 28, 2026, are point-in-time, and can change rapidly. Cryptocurrency is highly volatile, and you can lose money. Price predictions are inherently uncertain and the scenarios described are not guarantees. Do your own research and consult a qualified financial professional before making any investment decision.
Key Points
- Shares of Velo3D advanced 7.1% Monday following the company’s inclusion in both the Russell 3000 and Russell Microcap indexes
- The metal 3D printing firm officially entered both benchmarks on June 29 during the 2026 annual reconstitution process
- Approximately $12.2 trillion in investment assets track Russell US indexes based on May 2026 data
- The company’s market capitalization reached around $496 million, with shares posting gains exceeding 126% year-over-year
- The additive manufacturing specialist will maintain Russell 3000 membership through December 2026’s next reconstitution
Shares of metal additive manufacturing specialist Velo3D (VELO) rallied 7.1% Monday following the company’s addition to both the Russell 3000 Index and Russell Microcap Index, which became effective June 29.
The inclusion occurred during the initial 2026 reconstitution of Russell indexes, an annual process that evaluates and ranks the top 4,000 U.S. companies by total market capitalization based on April 30 data.
For smaller publicly traded companies, Russell index inclusion carries significant weight. As of late May 2026, approximately $12.2 trillion in investment capital was benchmarked to Russell US indexes.
This massive pool of passive investment capital typically flows into newly added stocks, as fund managers who track these indexes must purchase shares to maintain accurate index representation.
Prior to Monday’s announcement, VELO had already demonstrated impressive momentum. Over the preceding 12-month period, the stock had appreciated more than 126%, bringing its market capitalization to approximately $496 million entering June.
CEO Arun Jeldi expressed enthusiasm about the development. “Being added to the Russell 3000 and Russell Microcap indexes is an important milestone for Velo3D,” he stated.
“We have made meaningful strides in transforming the company, advancing our technology leadership, and creating value for shareholders. Inclusion in these widely followed indexes broadens our exposure to the investment community.”
Companies included in the Russell 3000 are automatically categorized into either the large-capitalization Russell 1000 or small-capitalization Russell 2000, along with corresponding growth and value style indexes.
Based on Velo3D’s present market capitalization, the firm qualifies for inclusion in both the Russell 2000 and Russell Microcap categories — representing the smaller end of the market spectrum while still delivering significant institutional investor visibility.
Velo3D’s Business Model
Velo3D specializes in metal 3D printing solutions designed primarily for aerospace and defense industry supply chains. The company’s product portfolio encompasses Flow print preparation software, the Sapphire printer series, and the Assure quality assurance platform.
Notable clients include SpaceX and Honeywell — relationships that underscore the company’s credibility within defense and aerospace manufacturing sectors.
Duration of Index Membership and Future Outlook
Velo3D’s Russell 3000 membership remains guaranteed through December 2026’s semi-annual reconstitution event. During that review, the company could potentially migrate between the Russell 1000 and Russell 2000 based on market capitalization fluctuations.
FTSE Russell oversees these benchmark indexes, which rank among the most extensively utilized standards for U.S. equity portfolio managers.
Monday’s 7.1% stock appreciation follows a familiar trend observed when smaller companies gain entry to major indexes — an initial buying surge fueled by passive fund inflows and heightened institutional interest.
Stream Finance, the collapsed DeFi yield protocol behind the depegged xUSD token, has begun collecting information from potential creditors and claimants as a step toward what it called a "potential global resolution." The protocol said in a post on X that it is gathering and confirming claim… Read the full story at The Defiant
Crypto influencer Ansem has airdropped about $7 million worth of the $ANSEM memecoin to Solana users, and said he will keep distributing tokens as the price rises in a push to grow the holder base to 1 million wallets. Ansem, who posts under the handle @blknoiz06 and counts close to 1 million… Read the full story at The Defiant
US President Donald Trump has about 10 days to decide whether or not to sign bipartisan housing legislation containing a ban on a central bank digital currency (CBDC) into law after saying he planned to prioritize a controversial voting bill.
According to reports, House Speaker Mike Johnson sent the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act to Trump’s desk on Monday, kicking off a 10-day timeline for the president to decide whether to ignore, sign or veto the bill under the US Constitution, excluding Sundays. The bill, passed by the House of Representatives last week, included language barring the Federal Reserve from issuing or creating a CBDC “or any digital asset that is substantially similar” until the end of 2030.
Donald Trump signing executive orders on Monday. Source: The White House
Trump reportedly called the legislation a “yawn” and sarcastically referred to the situation as a “big deal.” He canceled the signing ceremony for the bill on Wednesday, saying that Republicans in Congress should focus on passing the SAVE America Act. The legislation would require voters to provide proof of US citizenship in person to register, potentially disenfranchising millions of people.
The 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act received significant bipartisan support from Democrats and Republicans, with members of both parties lauding progress ahead of Trump’s potential signature. Sponsored by Senator Elizabeth Warren, the Democrat-led legislation included a CBDC ban in an attempt to garner support from Republicans and the White House.
Related: Senate leaders push for July passage of CLARITY Act
“We should be celebrating a bipartisan housing law,” said Warren on Monday. “Instead, we have a call to action. Mr. President: sign the damn bill.”
Senators on state work periods, chamber set to consider market structure
The US Senate broke on Friday for state work periods, with lawmakers expected to return by July 13. The chamber’s calendar gives lawmakers about four weeks to address the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act before another state work period in August.
Trump said in March that he would “not sign other bills” until the SAVE America Act was passed, but also made a social media post signaling that he supported CLARITY. Should the president veto the bill, Congress could override his action with a two-thirds majority in both chambers.
Magazine: SBF will never get a pardon, Trump peace deal boosts Bitcoin: Hodlers Digest June 14-21
Bitcoin (BTC) trades at an important inflection point as retail investors are selling, big institutions are in a hold despite the discounted valuation and the market is paused at $60,300—awaiting the next significant move. The situation reveals two very different investor groups making opposite bets.
Retail investors sell, TradFi watches
The general mood is fearful, with the Crypto Fear & Greed Index sitting at 36 out of 100, indicating fear but not total panic. This number masks a sharp divide. In June alone, investors pulled $4.4 billion from US spot Bitcoin ETFs—the worst month this year. At the same time, Strategy continues to buy BTC, although the pace and size of its purchases have slowed. While ETF flows and Bitcoin treasury accumulation are not in a buying phase, a majority of corporate BTC treasuries have not reduced their existing positions.
Spot Bitcoin ETF net flows. Source: SoSoValue.com
Leverage unwinds, but slowly
The aggregate open interest in Bitcoin futures contracts across all exchanges is $19.92 billion. Two weeks ago, it was $20.1 billion. This unwinding—when traders close positions to reduce risk—is happening in an orderly way, not in a panic.
The borrowing costs for holding long positions have dropped from 0.25% to 0.12%, suggesting that the worst of the forced selling is over. However, longs are still paying to hold their positions, meaning traders believe in a recovery but aren’t willing to bet their full account on it.
The current danger zone is $58,800, Bitcoin’s low for the day. If the price breaks below this level, the next $500 million worth of traders holding long positions could be forced to close their trades, sending Bitcoin toward $56,000. That move may extend the selling pressure into next week.
Bitcoin open interest, funding rate. Source: Hyblock
The market is waiting, not acting
When fresh capital flows into Bitcoin, volume spikes and the action shows up in the data. Right now, it doesn’t, as trading volume is down, and open interest changes are small. This suggests the market is in an indecisive phase where retail traders may be done selling, but nobody is confident enough to buy in size yet. That’s not surprising.
Related: Bitcoin balances $60K tightrope as US stocks rebound on fresh Iran peace deal hopes
MicroStrategy, which has accumulated Bitcoin for corporate reserves, did buy 3,600 Bitcoin in June for $236 million, betting on a recovery. But overall, institutions are holding rather than aggressively buying. This pause could break in either direction: lower (if one more wave of sellers emerges) or higher (if confidence returns).
For Bitcoin to move meaningfully higher, it needs to reclaim $62,000. The risk is real: a macro news event at any point in the week, like the June employment report or the resumption of military action in Iran, could weigh on investor sentiment and tip BTC back under the $60,000 handle.
Quick Overview
- Comcast stock gained momentum following the announcement of a two-company restructuring plan
- Alphabet made its historic debut in the Dow Jones Industrial Average
- Tech sector staged a strong recovery following last week’s downturn
- Investors prepare for Nike’s critical earnings announcement
- Crude oil prices advanced amid US-Iran diplomatic developments
Monday delivered a compelling slate of market developments as investors digested corporate restructuring announcements, index changes, and sector rotations. Let’s examine the five most significant market narratives from the trading session.
Comcast Announces Major Corporate Restructuring
Comcast revealed its intention to restructure into two distinct, standalone entities, separating its technology operations from its media holdings.
Market participants welcomed the news enthusiastically. The rationale is clear: dividing a sprawling conglomerate into specialized businesses allows each segment to be assessed independently based on its individual fundamentals.
Such corporate separations typically streamline decision-making, enhance operational efficiency, and frequently generate renewed investor enthusiasm. The development has prompted market observers to speculate whether other diversified corporations might pursue comparable strategies.
Alphabet Achieves Dow Jones Entry
Alphabet has officially secured its position within the Dow Jones Industrial Average, cementing its place among America’s most prominent publicly traded companies.
This inclusion underscores the undeniable importance of technology in today’s economic landscape. Alphabet’s addition brings substantial representation of artificial intelligence, cloud infrastructure, and digital marketing to the venerable index.
While the Dow membership carries primarily symbolic significance, it enhances visibility among institutional capital and index-tracking investment vehicles. Even as AI competition intensifies, Alphabet maintains its status as among the world’s most lucrative enterprises.
Technology Sector Rebounds From Recent Weakness
Following an extended period of declining valuations, technology equities mounted an impressive comeback during Monday’s session.
The Nasdaq outperformed broader markets as capital flowed back into chip manufacturers, artificial intelligence players, and enterprise software providers. Most market analysts interpreted the previous week’s decline as a healthy consolidation rather than a fundamental trend reversal.
Artificial intelligence investment continues fueling expenditures throughout cloud infrastructure, semiconductor manufacturing, and business software sectors. Market sentiment regarding technology’s sustained expansion trajectory remains fundamentally optimistic.
Nike Financial Results Draw Market Attention
Investor attention is increasingly focused on Nike’s forthcoming quarterly earnings disclosure.
As a bellwether consumer brand with worldwide reach, Nike provides valuable insight into international consumption patterns. Analysts will scrutinize performance metrics from North American markets and China, where purchasing activity has demonstrated volatility.
The athletic apparel giant has been navigating an operational transformation aimed at enhancing margins and refining its merchandise strategy. Positive results could energize the broader retail sector, while disappointing numbers might intensify anxiety regarding consumer expenditure trajectories.
Crude Oil Advances on Geopolitical Developments
Oil prices posted gains Monday as diplomatic exchanges between Washington and Tehran captured energy market participants’ focus.
Middle Eastern political dynamics routinely generate swift reactions in petroleum markets, and commodity traders monitored developments attentively. Elevated crude prices benefit exploration and production companies while simultaneously pressuring airlines, industrial manufacturers, and consumer-facing enterprises.
Given that inflation remains a priority concern for monetary authorities and central banking institutions, every fluctuation in petroleum pricing carries implications for overall market stability.
Filmmakers are already using artificial intelligence (AI) to cut animation production costs by up to 90%. New labor data from California confirms the industry is not waiting for the technology to mature.
Los Angeles County’s motion picture and sound recording sector shed 6,700 jobs year-over-year through May 2026. In total, those losses represent more than 90% of all employment declines recorded across the region’s information industry.
AI Reshapes What It Costs to Make a Film
Animators and directors on active productions report using AI to overhaul production workflows. The tools do not merely speed up existing tasks. They replace entire staffing layers, from storyboarding and character rigging through post-production cleanup.
Opinions divide sharply on the change. Some creators argue that AI will lower production barriers and expand storytelling possibilities. In contrast, others maintain it will eliminate the skilled workforce that built Hollywood’s animation industry over several decades.
Meanwhile, investment signals suggest studios are not waiting for the debate to resolve. Amazon Web Services recently backed a Hollywood production startup that deploys AI to reduce costs and compress production timelines.
That move signals studios’ view of AI efficiency as a structural necessity, not a temporary trend.
AI Job Cuts Extend Across the US Economy
The broader US labor market shows the same direction. AI-driven layoffs mounted across industries in early 2026 as companies rebuilt around smaller, automated teams. Goldman Sachs estimated that AI trimmed US payrolls by roughly 16,000 jobs per month over the past year.
However, entertainment’s concentration of losses runs disproportionately high by any measure.
The 6,700 motion picture jobs lost in LA County reflect a year-over-year comparison, not a single-month snapshot. Data from California’s EDD report shows the pressure on studios and production houses has been persistent and consistent throughout the period.
Los Angeles Absorbs the Deepest Cut
Research adds another layer to that worker risk. Workers who resist AI tools face layoff odds triple those of peers who integrate them. The pattern holds across sectors.
Animators face a difficult choice. They must adopt the technology displacing their role, or risk losing it for not adapting.
Similarly, the disruption extends beyond film. AI already reshaped hiring in the gambling sector this year. Tech workers seeking crypto roles as an automation hedge signal anxiety spreading across knowledge-worker industries.
Filmmakers now say the 90% cost reduction is achievable today, not a future projection. How many more production roles disappear before the industry finds a new equilibrium remains the open question.
The post AI Cuts Animation Costs by 90% as Hollywood Braces for Mass Layoffs appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Ethena’s governance token ENA has climbed after BlackRock integrated the project’s synthetic dollar USDe into its Aladdin investment platform, extending institutional access to a system used to oversee more than $20 trillion in assets.
Summary
- BlackRock has integrated Ethena’s USDe into its Aladdin platform, expanding institutional access to the synthetic dollar.
- ENA rose as much as 12% following the announcement, outperforming the broader crypto market despite Bitcoin trading below $60,000.
- StablecoinX founder Ted Chen said the integration opens USDe to institutions managing more than $20 trillion through Aladdin.
According to a June 29 X announcement from Ethena, the integration enables financial institutions using BlackRock’s Aladdin platform to access USDe through their existing investment and risk management workflows.
The company said the collaboration gives institutions connected to Aladdin a new route to allocate capital to the synthetic dollar while managing positions within the same platform.
BlackRock has expanded its relationship with Ethena
Alongside the USDe integration, Ethena confirmed that BlackRock’s tokenized money market fund BUIDL will become the primary reserve asset for its white-label product. The companies already work together through USDtb, Ethena’s stablecoin backed mainly by BUIDL, making the latest announcement an expansion of an existing relationship rather than a new partnership.
Ethena also said it will provide a liquidity facility for BlackRock’s tokenized products. The company did not disclose financial terms or a launch timeline but described the arrangement as another step in connecting tokenized assets with institutional infrastructure.
The announcement follows several deals involving Ethena’s stablecoin business this month. Earlier, the company selected Centrifuge as its tokenization partner and entered an agreement with global asset manager Janus Henderson. As part of that collaboration, Janus Henderson committed to invest in ENA, Ethena’s governance token.
Another recent milestone came after StablecoinX completed its merger with TLGY Acquisition Corp., allowing the Ethena-focused infrastructure company to begin trading on Nasdaq under the ticker USDE.
The company said its public warrants started trading under the symbol USDEW on June 26 following the completion of the business combination a day earlier. The listing provides public-market investors with direct exposure to StablecoinX’s Ethena-focused strategy even as demand for USDe remains below last year’s peak.
ENA has outperformed the broader crypto market
As per data from crypto.news, Ethena (ENA) price rose 12% to $0.083 shortly after the BlackRock announcement before easing to around $0.081, leaving the token about 7% higher on the day. The gain came while the wider cryptocurrency market remained under pressure, with Bitcoin trading below $60,000.
Part of the positive reaction may be linked to Ethena’s fee-switch mechanism. Under the project’s design, a share of protocol revenue is allocated toward buying back ENA, meaning increased activity around USDe could benefit the governance token over time.
Commenting on the announcement, StablecoinX founder Ted Chen said the Aladdin integration significantly increases USDe’s institutional reach because insurers, pension funds and major asset managers already rely on the platform. He noted that organizations including Deutsche Bank and Citi use Aladdin to oversee portfolios.
“That’s over $20 trillion in assets that these managers have on the Aladdin platform. Now, all of these managers will have the ability to not only allocate to USDe, but also seamlessly integrate it into their existing portfolio management and risk analytics processes.”
Ukraine has placed more than $8.3 million in seized crypto under state management, the first time the country has moved confiscated digital assets into a government-controlled wallet.
The National Agency for Finding, Tracing, and Management of Assets, known as ARMA, received the funds from wallets tied to an alleged member of an international hacking group.
Seized Crypto from an International Hacking Case
The holding is Tether (USDT), the largest stablecoin, valued at over 372 million Ukrainian hryvnias at the time of the transfer, according to prosecutors.
Investigators say the group attacked people and companies across Europe and the United States. The case reflects a rise in stablecoin-driven crypto crime.
The attackers stole confidential data, demanded ransom payments, and laundered the money in Ukraine through real estate and cars.
Authorities estimate the network caused more than $100 million in damage. The pattern mirrors other crypto laundering networks that ended in multiple arrests.
Four suspects, including the alleged organizer, remain in custody. Total seizures in the case topped $11.1 million, covering homes, apartments, vehicles, and cash.
What State Custody Means for the Funds
Until now, crypto seized in Ukrainian cases sat frozen, with no agency actively holding or moving it. The transfer gives ARMA direct control of the wallet.
A 2025 reform law overhauled how ARMA manages seized property, adding independent audits and tighter oversight. The change was a condition of hundreds of millions of euros in European Union support.
The step stops short of confiscation, which requires a court conviction. For now, the agency holds the assets rather than owning them.
USDT sits near its dollar peg, trading close to $1. That gives ARMA a relatively stable asset to manage, hold, or eventually sell.
A stablecoin avoids the price swings tied to bitcoin, making the holding easier to value. But USDT is centrally controlled, and Tether can freeze tokens at law enforcement requests.
Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens
What to do with seized crypto has split governments. The United States ordered forfeited Bitcoin into a strategic reserve it pledged not to sell. It treats confiscated coins as a long-term asset.
Germany took the opposite path, and critics still debate its seizure of Bitcoin sales after prices later climbed.
Ukraine has not said whether it will sell the USDT or hold it. That choice may shape how it treats future seizures, and whether seized tokens become state revenue.
The post Ukraine Moves $8.3 Million in Seized Crypto Under State Management appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.
MoneySimpler promotes passive income strategies for ETH, USDT, and USDC holders through AI-driven digital asset utilization tools.
Summary
- MoneySimpler offers AI-driven automated strategies for ETH, USDT, and USDC holders to generate passive income.
- MoneySimpler uses 24/7 AI quantitative trading to analyze markets and automate digital asset management.
- MoneySimpler enables simple, automated crypto strategies for ETH, USDT, USDC, and BTC with real-time tracking.
For those who hold ETH, USDT, or USDC, they might have wondered: besides waiting for prices to rise, can these digital assets create more value?
In recent years, more and more digital asset investors have begun exploring new avenues for passive income. From staking and DeFi to AI-automated trading, the focus is no longer just on asset prices but on how to more effectively utilize funds to ensure that the digital assets they hold continue to generate value.
MoneySimpler provides daily passive income for ETH, USDT, and USDC holders through an intelligent and automated asset management model.
How can automated strategies help improve returns on assets?
The digital asset market operates 24/7, and more and more investors want to reduce the time costs of frequent market monitoring and manual trading while simultaneously increasing asset returns.
MoneySimpler uses an AI-powered quantitative trading system to continuously analyze the market and automatically execute corresponding processes based on preset strategies, helping users to use quantitative trading more conveniently and improve their returns.
The main features of the platform include:
- Automated operation 24/7, no need for frequent market monitoring
- Intelligent quantitative strategies continuously analyze market changes
- Supports mainstream digital assets such as ETH, USDT, USDC, and BTC
- Allows users to view account status, profit records, and asset information at any time
- Simple operation process, no complex trading experience required
How to get started with MoneySimpler?
MoneySimpler is dedicated to simplifying the AI-driven quantitative trading process. Users can quickly start AI-automated trading without programming, building a trading system, or constantly monitoring the market.
Step 1: Register an Account
Upon completing account registration, new users will receive a $10 sign-up bonus and a $50 trial fund to experience the platform’s AI-powered automated trading features.
Step 2: Choose a Trading Plan
Select a suitable trading plan based on needs and complete asset allocation using cryptocurrency. (Minimum investment starts from $100)
Examples of popular contracts
Basis Arbitrage Strategy: Invest $100, 2-day period, daily return $4, total return at maturity $100 + $8
Digital Asset Trend Tracking 2.05: Invest $600, 5-day period, daily return $7.5, total return at maturity $600 + $37.5
Digital Asset Trend Tracking 2.1: Invest $1,100, 10-day period, daily return $14.3, total return at maturity $1100 + $143
Trend Tracking 2.1: Invest $5,000, 20-day period, daily return $70.5, total return at maturity $5,000 + $1,410
Inter-Exchange Arbitrage 3.5: Invest $12,000, 30-day period, daily return $153, total return at maturity $10,000 + $4,590
Cryptocurrency Statistical Arbitrage Strategy 2.45: Invest $100,000, 40-day period, daily return $1,950, total return at maturity $100,000 + $78,000
For more strategy details, please visit the MoneySimpler website.
Step 3: Activate AI-Automated Trading.
After selecting the corresponding trading contract, daily profits will be automatically settled into an account. The AI system will automatically run the corresponding strategy and execute trades based on market changes.
A secure and transparent smart quantitative trading platform
For digital asset users, a platform’s security, transparency, and compliance are often just as important as profit opportunities.
MoneySimpler continuously improves its platform security system and adheres to international digital asset management standards to provide users with more reliable intelligent quantitative services.
The platform’s security and compliance system includes:
- Compliant with the UK Financial Conduct Authority and the EU MiCA (Mini-Assets Framework) standards for crypto assets;
- Quarterly earnings audits by PwC;
- Lloyd’s of London provides insurance coverage for the platform’s funds;
- Cloudflare and McAfee provide enterprise-grade cybersecurity and real-time security protection.
With a robust compliance, security, and risk control system, MoneySimpler is committed to providing global ETH, USDT, and USDC holders with a safer, more transparent, and intelligent quantitative asset management experience.
Summarize
The development of the digital asset market is driving investors to shift from “long-term holding” to “enhancing asset profitability.”
For users holding ETH, USDT, or USDC, MoneySimpler offers a smarter, automated asset management approach, allowing idle digital assets to generate more value.
Register an account now on the Money Simpler official platform, claim new user rewards, experience AI-powered quantitative trading, and start the daily passive income journey.
Disclosure: This content is provided by a third party. Neither crypto.news nor the author of this article endorses any product mentioned on this page. Users should conduct their own research before taking any action related to the company.
Yung Gravy – Betty (Get Money) (Official Music Video)
Nursing degrees gain ‘professional’ designation after judge’s ruling, but theology now dropped
Bed Bath & Beyond launches coupon hunt with $100,000 home makeover prize
-
Sports6 days agoTwo goals and an assist by sheer aura: Cristiano Ronaldo just entered the World Cup chat
-
Fashion3 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Staud – Corporette.com
-
Politics4 days agoThe House | Manchesterism won’t survive the painful trade-offs unless it gets citizens on board
-
Politics4 days agoPotential 2028er World Cup attendee leaderboard
-
News Videos1 day agoMAJOR BITCOIN & MARKET UPDATE!!!! (MUST WATCH ASAP!!!)
-
Business4 days agoAsia stock markets slide as tech shares slump
-
Tech4 days agoA Look At A Gaggle Of Transputer Boards
-
Crypto World6 days ago
Bitcoin (BTC) Dips Below $62K, Ethereum (ETH) Plunges 6% Daily: Market Watch
-
Crypto World4 days agoDell (DELL) Shares Tumble Over 5% Following Analyst Downgrade to Hold
-
Crypto World2 days agoCoinbase, Circle Deepen Crypto Stock Losses Despite Resilient S&P 500
-
Crypto World6 days agoSecuritize Wraps Roubini's SEC-Registered ETF as Dubai VARA Digital Security
-
Business6 days ago
Entergy settles forward sale agreements, raises $672 million in cash proceeds
-
Crypto World3 days agoKraken's xStocks Opens Bending Spoons IPO Registration to EEA Retail
-
Sports3 days agoFIH Pro League: India defeat Pakistan 7-1, register biggest win of campaign | Other Sports News
-
Tech2 days agoRussian hackers now target Signal backup recovery keys
-
Tech2 days agoBluekit phishing kit adopts browser-in-the-middle for login theft
-
Crypto World4 days agoBitcoin Sparks $600M Hourly Liquidations With $65,000 Set To Become Resistance
-
Crypto World3 days agoRTX holders must register wallets before token distribution begins
-
Crypto World3 days ago
Hyperliquid Named on Singapore MAS Investor Alert Register
-
Crypto World5 days agoRipple and SBI launch RLUSD in Japan after JFSA approval
You must be logged in to post a comment Login