Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

Iran wants tolls paid in bitcoin for Strait of Hormuz passage

Published

on

Iran wants tolls paid in bitcoin for Strait of Hormuz passage

Iran told tanker operators on Wednesday that they must pay bitcoin (BTC) to pass through the Strait of Hormuz.

The use of BTC, mentioned by name by Hamid Hosseini, a spokesman for the country’s oil exporters’ union, ensures payments “can’t be traced or confiscated due to sanctions,” even though the first part of that quote is certainly inaccurate.

Moreover, there will be “a few seconds” to pay, according to the spokesman.

All BTC can be traced on-chain, and the US Treasury has sanctioned Iranian BTC wallet addresses since at least 2018.

Advertisement

Even more embarrassingly, the spokesman claimed that BTC payments will complete within seconds, even though BTC transactions normally require several minutes to settle.

Anyway, Hosseini claims that oil tankers will somehow email Iranian authorities about cargo, submit to an inspection, and then pay a toll of $1 per barrel of oil in BTC.

FT published the news at 8:57am New York time. Whether on that news or for unrelated reasons, BTC rallied from $72,000 to $72,865 within 20 minutes. BTC then retraced that rally entirely, dipping back below $92,000 within half an hour.

Bitcoin price chart, 8:57am-11:57am New York time today. Source: TradingView

Prior to the news last night, BTC rallied substantially, gaining about 6% on ceasefire discussions between the US and Iran.

Iran’s bitcoin rationale is half-right

Although BTC is easy to trace, the unfreezable half of Hosseini’s logic is technically defensible. 

Advertisement

Unlike BTC, most major stablecoins can be frozen. Blockchain analytics firm Elliptic found Iran’s central bank accumulated over $500 million worth of tether (USDT) in 2025. In June of that year, Tether froze $37 million in wallets linked to the central bank. 

In March 2026, Tether froze another $6.7 million tied to IRGC and Houthi-linked networks. 

Unlike BTC which settles over several minutes, USDT can settle within seconds. The stablecoin served as Iran’s preferred oil settlement rail, until Tether started blacklisting its wallets. 

Read more: US hits Iran’s ‘shadow banking’ network in Hong Kong, UAE

Advertisement

Sanctioning Iranian BTC wallets

Although no company can freeze BTC, the US Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned Iranian BTC wallets on ransomware allegations in November 2018.

Since then, Chainalysis, Elliptic, and TRM Labs have built entire product lines around mapping Iranian-linked BTC and crypto flows.

In January 2026, OFAC designated UK-registered exchanges Zedcex and Zedxion for processing crypto assets for Iran’s IRGC, attaching crypto wallet addresses to that action.

According to the Chainalysis 2026 Crypto Crime Report, IRGC-linked addresses accounted for more than 50% of all value flowing into Iran’s crypto ecosystem in Q4 2025.

Advertisement

Over the full year, those addresses received at least $3 billion.

Any company that does pay the toll without US approval faces another problem. US, EU, and UK sanctions generally prohibit transactions with IRGC-affiliated entities. 

OFAC’s interpretation of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act applies equally to BTC transfers as it does wire payments.

Specifically, a 2022 federal case in Washington DC established precedent that advertising crypto services as “designed to evade US sanctions” can serve as evidence of a sanctions-evasion conspiracy.

Advertisement

Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news, follow us on X, Bluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Trump Weighs NATO Troop Shakeup as Punishment: Could Tariffs Be Next?

Published

on

President Trump is weighing a plan to relocate US troops away from NATO countries he considers “unhelpful” in the Iran conflict, according to the Wall Street Journal.

The proposal, still in early stages, is one of several White House options to pressure allies over limited support for US-led operations.

NATO Rift Over Iran Widens

The plan would shift portions of roughly 84,000 American troops stationed across Europe. Trump and his team have expressed frustration at allies who denied the US logistical help, airspace access, or base use during strikes against Iran.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the administration would need to reexamine NATO’s value.

Advertisement

Trump himself has called some allies “cowards” and labeled the alliance a “paper tiger.”

Countries viewed as supportive, including Poland, Romania, Lithuania, and Greece, could receive additional forces. Those nations have aligned more closely with Washington’s eastern flank priorities.

Trade Threats Already in Motion

Trump threatened to cut off all trade with Spain after it refused to allow US military bases to be used in strikes against Iran.

Advertisement

He directed Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to end all dealings with Madrid.

Meanwhile, Trump announced immediate 50% tariffs on goods from any country supplying weapons to Iran, with no exclusions or exemptions.

Russia and China are Iran’s most significant weapons suppliers.

No tariff package specifically targeting “unhelpful” NATO members has been formally announced.

Advertisement

However, the Spain episode and Trump’s pattern of mixing military pressure with economic punishment suggest trade measures could follow.

“The proposal would involve moving US troops from ‘unhelpful’ countries and into countries that were ‘more supportive’ of the Iran War 2. The plan is early in conception and one of several that the White House is discussing to punish NATO,” the Kobeissi Letter indicated, citing the WSJ.

Whether tariffs become the matching stick for resisters may depend on how NATO responds as ceasefire talks with Iran continue.

The post Trump Weighs NATO Troop Shakeup as Punishment: Could Tariffs Be Next? appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

US Treasury Moves Forward with GENIUS Act, Focusing on Illicit Finance

Published

on

Law, Government, United States, Stablecoin

Payment stablecoin issuers in the United States will be required to implement a regime targeting illicit finance under the proposed framework for the GENIUS Act.

In a Wednesday notice, the US Treasury Department said its Financial Crimes Enforcement Network and Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) had issued a joint proposed rule to implement provisions of the GENIUS Act, signed into law in July 2025. 

The proposal would direct payment stablecoin issuers to establish and maintain an anti-money laundering (AML) and countering the financing of terrorism (CFT) program, maintain a sanctions compliance program, and have the ability to “block, freeze and reject” certain stablecoin transactions. Issuers would be treated as financial institutions for purposes of the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA).

“Bringing stablecoin issuers into full BSA/OFAC compliance effectively turns them into bank-like gatekeepers,” Snir Levi, CEO of blockchain intelligence firm Nominis, told Cointelegraph. “That means significantly more wallet freezes, transaction blocking and asset seizures at scale,” he said.

Advertisement
Law, Government, United States, Stablecoin
Source: Financial Crimes Enforcement Network

Treasury’s notice was part of the implementation of the GENIUS Act, the stablecoin payments bill signed into law by US President Donald Trump last year. The legislation provides a framework for stablecoin issuers and is expected to be a boon for crypto markets. It will be effective 18 months after it was signed in July or 120 days after federal authorities issue related regulations.

Related: NYT revives Adam Back theory in latest bid to identify Bitcoin creator

On Tuesday, the US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) issued its own proposed rule as part of the agency’s GENIUS Act implementation. The FDIC said stablecoin holders would not be insured under the bill, though reserve deposits for issuers would receive protection.

Stablecoin yield fight rages between US lawmakers and banking and crypto industries

While federal agencies work on implementation of the GENIUS Act, Congress has effectively been stalled on progress for a bill to establish a digital asset market framework, called the CLARITY Act when it passed the House of Representatives last year.

Advertisement

With the Senate Banking Committee yet to schedule a markup on the bill — a necessary step before a full floor vote in the chamber — crypto and banking representatives have been meeting with White House officials to discuss issues related to stablecoin yield, tokenized equities and ethics.

The White House’s Council of Economic Advisers said on Wednesday that a ban on stablecoin yield in the bill “would do very little to protect bank lending,” claiming that it would impose costs on users.

As of Wednesday, the banking committee had not rescheduled a markup on the CLARITY Act.

Magazine: Your guide to surviving this mini-crypto winter

Advertisement