Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

Iran War News: Trump Threatens Civilian Strikes

Published

on

Trump fires Pam Bondi, puts pro-crypto Todd Blanche

Iran war news escalated Monday as President Trump renewed his threat to bomb Iranian bridges and power plants if no deal is reached before Wednesday’s ceasefire expiry, NBC News reported, even as Iran’s central military command warned its response to any civilian infrastructure strike would be “much more devastating and widespread.”

Summary

  • Trump told reporters Iran is “getting obliterated” and said he alone controls any ceasefire decision, adding he has given Tehran opportunities to end the war that they have not taken.
  • When asked if bombing civilian infrastructure would be a war crime, Trump said: “No. I hope I don’t have to do it.”
  • Iran’s Khatam al-Anbiya military command warned that any repeat attack on civilian targets will trigger a “much more devastating and widespread” response.

Iran war news reached its most dangerous threshold this week as Trump used the Wednesday ceasefire expiry as a hard deadline for Iran to accept his terms or face strikes on power plants, bridges, and other civilian infrastructure. The threat is not new: Trump warned “a whole civilization will die tonight” on April 7, before agreeing to the current two-week ceasefire hours later. He has now renewed the threat with the ceasefire’s final days running out and no deal in sight.

“No. I hope I don’t have to do it,” Trump told reporters Monday when asked directly if bombing civilian infrastructure would constitute a war crime. He pointed to Iranian attacks on civilians throughout the conflict, saying: “They’re animals, and we have to stop them.”

Advertisement

Iran’s Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters issued a formal statement Monday: “If attacks on civilian targets are repeated, the next stages of our offensive and retaliatory operations will be much more devastating and widespread.”

Trump simultaneously described Iran as negotiating “in good faith” and told Axios on Sunday that “the concept of the deal is done,” while maintaining his infrastructure strike threat on a parallel track. That framing positions the threat as pressure rather than intent, but the US military in the Central Command region has maintained full strike readiness throughout the ceasefire period.

Iran has said any attack on its power plants would trigger retaliatory strikes on power stations and desalination plants across Gulf Arab states. Iranian authorities urged civilians to form human chains around power plants as a deterrent. Iran’s internet infrastructure has already suffered outages attributed to earlier strikes, and the Bushehr nuclear facility was previously hit.

Asked about a Pakistani proposal for a 45-day extended ceasefire, Trump described it as “not good enough, but a very significant step,” the closest he came Monday to acknowledging that a bridging framework exists.

Advertisement

The Legal and Diplomatic Context

Legal experts have consistently described Trump’s specific threats against power plants and water infrastructure as potential war crimes under international humanitarian law and the Fourth Geneva Convention. Attacking civilian infrastructure that does not serve a direct military function constitutes collective punishment of a civilian population, which is prohibited under the Geneva rules.

Trump rejected the framing when pressed directly. Secretary of State Marco Rubio did not respond to reporters’ questions about whether civilian infrastructure strikes would constitute war crimes. The administration has not publicly offered a legal argument that the targeted infrastructure qualifies as dual-use military assets.

Pakistan, Egypt, and Turkey have all been working on bridging proposals. Iran has told intermediaries it is open to a 45-day ceasefire guaranteeing a path to a permanent settlement, a position Trump acknowledged without accepting.

Advertisement

What a Strike Would Mean for Oil and Crypto

For oil bitcoin correlation dynamics, a confirmed strike on Iranian civilian infrastructure without a deal removes any near-term prospect of diplomatic resolution and pushes Brent crude through the $100 level toward the war-peak range of $114 to $166. The market has been trading diplomatic signals, not military reality. An executed infrastructure strike resets that calculus entirely.

A nuclear deal scenario, the opposite outcome, remains on the table but requires Iran to accept some form of nuclear concession it has publicly rejected. Analysts have outlined a path from Bitcoin at $74,000 to $100,000 under a genuine ceasefire and Hormuz reopening, a scenario that requires the opposite of what civilian infrastructure strikes would produce.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Arbitrum Security Council Blocks KelpDAO Hacker From 30,766 ETH

Published

on

Arbitrum Security Council Blocks KelpDAO Hacker From 30,766 ETH

Arbitrum’s Security Council has frozen 30,766 ETH on Arbitrum One tied to the recent KelpDAO exploit.

The council said that it acted after coordinating with law enforcement on the identity of the exploiter.

Arbitrum Council Moves Funds to a Wallet-Only Governance Can Unlock

BeInCrypto reported that attackers drained roughly 116,500 rsETH, worth about $292 million, from KelpDAO on April 18. The attacker then supplied the stolen rsETH as collateral on Aave V3 and borrowed a large volume of WETH against it.

“KelpDAO appears to have had $280M+ stolen one hour ago on Ethereum and Arbitrum. The attack addresses were funded via Tornado Cash,” ZachXBT wrote on Telegram.

Now, the Arbitrum Security Council transferred the 30,766 ETH to an intermediary frozen wallet shortly before midnight ET on April 20, according to the team’s statement. Thus, the original address holding the funds can no longer access them.

Advertisement

Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens

Only further governance action can move the ETH from its new location. Arbitrum said that the process will be coordinated with the relevant parties.

“After significant technical diligence and deliberation, the Security Council identified and executed a technical approach to move funds to safety without affecting any other chain state or Arbitrum users,” the team said.

The Security Council is a 12-member body elected by the Arbitrum DAO. It is responsible for making time-sensitive decisions and emergency measures to safeguard the DAO, its members, and the wider Arbitrum community. Today’s action is a notable use of those emergency powers.

Advertisement

The KelpDAO hack marked the largest Decentralized Finance (DeFi) exploit of 2026. LayerZero attributed the attack based on preliminary evidence to North Korea’s Lazarus Group, most likely its TraderTraitor subunit.

The post Arbitrum Security Council Blocks KelpDAO Hacker From 30,766 ETH appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

ZachXBT presses MemeCore over $6B valuation and token supply concentration

Published

on

ZachXBT presses MemeCore over $6B valuation and token supply concentration

On-chain sleuth ZachXBT has raised fresh questions over MemeCore’s M token, urging the project to justify its multibillion-dollar valuation and clarify claims that insiders control more than 90% of the supply.

Summary

  • ZachXBT questions MemeCore’s valuation and asks for proof supporting its multibillion-dollar market cap.
  • Blockchain data shows a large share of M token supply held by a few wallets, including a Binance deposit address.
  • Scrutiny follows the recent RAVE token collapse, with investigators flagging similar price patterns across several tokens.

According to posts on X, on-chain investigator ZachXBT has publicly pressed MemeCore to explain how its M token reached a multibillion-dollar valuation while a large share of supply appears concentrated among a few holders.

“Please provide a single data point to support your $6B mkt cap at a top 20 token and why insiders hold >90% of supply,” ZachXBT wrote on Monday, responding to the project’s claims of building a layer–1 blockchain for the “Meme 2.0 economy.”

Advertisement

The remarks arrive at a time when the token has surged in price, drawing attention to how its market value is being calculated across platforms. CoinMarketCap placed the token at No. 21 with a valuation of $4.33 billion, while CoinGecko ranked it No. 20 at roughly $5.97 billion, pointing to a gap in reported figures across trackers.

Blockchain data has added another layer to the discussion around distribution. Data from Bubblemaps shows that the Binance deposit address is the largest holder, controlling about 41.3% of the supply.

The second-largest wallet, identified as “0x8b8,” holds 50 million M tokens worth around $178 million, accounting for 21.77% of the total supply.

Advertisement

Bubblemaps analyst 0xToolman said the pattern “looks like team holdings,” suggesting that a portion of the supply may not yet be circulating in the open market. No on-chain evidence has been shared so far to confirm the claim that insiders control more than 90% of the token supply, though ZachXBT said he would continue examining the data.

RAVE collapse adds context to fresh scrutiny

The latest questions around MemeCore follow a sharp fallout tied to another token that recently drew attention from the same investigator.

“Other projects with highly questionable price action recently include: SIREN, MYX, COAI, M, PIPPIN, RIVER,” ZachXBT wrote in a separate post over the weekend, adding that he plans to review these tokens to identify potential manipulation.

Rave DAO’s token became a focal point after it surged from $0.25 to nearly $28 within days before losing more than 80% of its value. ZachXBT alleged that the move carried signs of a coordinated pump-and-dump, pointing to concentrated holdings and unusual exchange flows.

Advertisement

RaveDAO has rejected the accusation, maintaining that it was not involved in the price spike or the subsequent crash. Binance and Bitget have both said they are reviewing the situation.

Market data shows the RAVE token has fallen 92% over the past week and was trading above $0.69 as of 12:46 p.m. UTC on Monday, according to CoinMarketCap.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Proposed AI Dividend Would be Funded by Taxes on AI and Paid to US Citizens

Published

on

Proposed AI Dividend Would be Funded by Taxes on AI and Paid to US Citizens

A New York state assemblymember and congressional candidate has proposed an artificial intelligence dividend program for US citizens to address potential job losses stemming from advances in AI technology.

In an X post on Sunday, New York lawmaker Alex Bores outlined a plan to prepare the US and its citizens for the “potential large-scale displacement of human labor by artificial intelligence.”

“Today, I’m proud to announce the AI Dividend, my plan to prepare for the AI economy with direct payments to Americans funded by tax reform that simultaneously incentivizes hiring humans instead of AI,” he said.

Bores’ move comes amid growing concerns that AI could eventually drive mass unemployment. According to a recent Goldman Sachs report, AI adoption has resulted in the loss of about 16,000 jobs per month over the past year.

Advertisement
Alex Bores’ proposed AI dividend program. Source: Alex Bores

The proposed program would be funded through avenues such as a tax on AI use, equity stakes in leading AI companies, and tax reforms to the “treatment of labor and capital.”

Bores is currently touting the policy as part of his run for a seat in Congress, and its progress in getting off the ground may be dependent on the success of his campaign. 

Alongside paying dividends to US citizens, the funds would also go toward investments in “workforce transition, training and education” and establishing oversight and safety infrastructure.

Related: One year under Paul Atkins, SEC’s crypto stance shows break with past

“At its core, the AI Dividend is simple: if AI dramatically increases productivity and concentrates wealth, the American people have a stake in those gains,” the dividend plan read. 

Advertisement

“The AI Dividend is a direct payment program that kicks in when and if AI meaningfully displaces American workers. It is not a punishment for innovation — it is an insurance policy.”

High-profile US tech giants such as Amazon, Meta, Intel and Microsoft have either already laid off thousands of workers or have reportedly planned to, due to efficiencies created by AI.  

However, global investment banking firm Morgan Stanley released a report on April 14 on AI job displacement, noting that the impact on the labor market has been “modest so far.”

Morgan Stanley argued that there has been limited evidence of widespread job losses and that, historically, new waves of technology can help expand employment over time, even as they displace some roles. It did, however, acknowledge that AI could defy this historical precedent.

Magazine: Will the CLARITY Act be good — or bad — for DeFi?

Advertisement