The push to pass the CLARITY Act in the United States is intensifying as lawmakers face a looming deadline to provide clear regulatory oversight for the crypto industry. Senator Cynthia Lummis, among the most vocal crypto advocates in Congress, warned that delay could push meaningful legislation into a distant future, potentially delaying the sector’s growth and investor protections.

In a Friday post on X, Lummis framed the moment as a last chance to enact relief before 2030, arguing that the U.S. cannot surrender its financial future. The comment arrives as momentum for the bill appears fragile amid the upcoming midterm elections in November, which could reshape congressional priorities and slow the momentum around what many see as a foundational market-structure framework for digital assets.

Echoing the urgency, David Sacks, former White House AI and crypto czar, weighed in with a similar sentiment. “The time to act is now. Senate Banking, and then the full Senate, should pass market structure. I’m confident that they will. And then President Trump will sign this landmark bill into law,” Sacks wrote. The chorus from industry insiders underscores a shared view: absence of a clear regulatory path could hobble innovation and investor confidence.

Key takeaways

• Legislative urgency surrounds the CLARITY Act, with proponents arguing that clear regulatory boundaries are essential for advancing the U.S. crypto sector and protecting consumers.
• Timing remains a major question mark due to the November midterm elections, which could shift congressional priorities and slow passage of crypto legislation.
• Support crosses sectors and roles, with influential figures—from venture capital to exchange executives and technology founders—arguing that well-defined rules foster growth and certainty for participants.
• Internal debates on specifics, notably around stablecoin yield, pose potential chokepoints that could affect markup or floor votes in the Senate.
• Regulators themselves have voiced support for a comprehensive market-structure framework, signaling alignment with lawmakers on the direction of regulation.

CLARITY Act as a catalyst for U.S. crypto growth

Industry participants widely view regulatory clarity as a catalyst for innovation. A familiar refrain across crypto circles is that clear rules help both consumers and builders navigate risk, reduce ambiguity, and foster responsible innovation. Chris Dixon, managing partner at A16z Crypto, captured this sentiment in a post, noting that “when rules are defined, both consumers and entrepreneurs win.”

The sentiment extends beyond investment capital to product development and user experience. Robbie Ferguson, co-founder of Immutable, argued that the act could accelerate the sector’s growth trajectory, suggesting that clearer oversight would unlock opportunities for developers and gamers alike. The Web3 gaming ecosystem, in particular, has been a fervent advocate for clarity as a means to scale and protect players and developers in a regulated, trusted environment.

A wave of industry voices has also highlighted how clarity could influence real-world adoption. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong called for moving forward with the legislation after months of delays, signaling that the industry wants a path forward that offers predictability and guardrails for participants ranging from exchanges to resourceful startups. Coinbase chief legal officer Paul Grewal also signaled that progress toward a Senate markup hearing could be within reach, though he cautioned that relief hinges on reconciling disputes over stablecoin yield—a friction point that has lingered in negotiations.

On the regulatory front, the push for a comprehensive market-structure framework has drawn support from prominent regulatory figures. SEC Chair Paul Atkins publicly framed the moment as an opportunity for Congress to “future-proof against rogue regulators” and advance a broad framework that could guide the sector through anticipated changes in technology and market dynamics. His comments align with the broader view that congressional action is needed to preempt ad hoc or inconsistent regulatory actions that can unsettle markets and erode investor trust.

Industry alignment and governance questions

The CLARITY Act’s proponents argue that a clear delineation of which regulators oversee various crypto activities would reduce jurisdictional ambiguity and potential regulatory gaps. The broader market has been watching closely for signals about how the U.S. could harmonize oversight between agencies such as the CFTC and the SEC, while also addressing stablecoins as a critical asset class within the crypto ecosystem.

And while there is broad internal agreement on the need for a clear regulatory framework, negotiations are not without friction. Grewal’s remarks underscored a central sticking point: the yield mechanisms of stablecoins. A resolution on this issue appears essential to advancing to a formal markup in the Senate Banking Committee and, ultimately, a vote on the full Senate floor. The absence of consensus on stablecoins could delay movement even as other parts of the bill gain traction.

Regulators themselves have shown support for moving ahead with clear market structure legislation. Atkins’s comments reflect a shared industry sentiment that well-crafted rules would protect consumers, reduce exposure to rogue actors, and create an environment where legitimate crypto projects can flourish with a clear legal footing. This alignment between lawmakers and regulatory leaders could be a pivotal factor in determining whether the CLARITY Act gains the momentum it needs before the election cycle intensifies partisan debates around technology policy.

What this means for investors and builders

For investors, the prospect of a clear regulatory framework could reduce the legal and policy uncertainty that has weighed on asset prices and capital allocation in the crypto space. A well-defined regime may lower compliance risks for exchanges and on-chain platforms, potentially boosting institutional participation and retail confidence alike. For builders, a clarified map of permissible activities, responsible boundaries, and clear licensing expectations could accelerate product development and drive consumer adoption—provided that the final text resolves disputes that currently threaten to stall progress.

Historically, regulatory clarity has correlated with greater market maturity. If the CLARITY Act eventually becomes law, it could set a precedent for how the United States addresses both innovation and risk in digital assets. The timing, however, remains a crucial variable. With midterm elections looming, lawmakers may prioritize other issues, potentially delaying a milestone for the industry. Yet the breadth of support—from venture capital to founders of major crypto projects—signals a broad desire to move beyond debate and toward a functional framework that aligns incentives across the ecosystem.

What remains uncertain is whether the bill can bridge outstanding points of disagreement, particularly around stablecoins, before the Senate’s markup and subsequent floor vote. If those gaps persist, momentum may stall even as other provisions gain traction. Investors should monitor not only the political timetable but also the evolving stance of regulators on the practicalities of stability mechanisms and how they intersect with market structure legislation.

Beyond the U.S., observers note that global regulatory conversations increasingly mirror the desire for clarity and predictability. For markets that operate across borders, a clear U.S. standard could influence international norms, encouraging harmonization or at least mutual recognition of compliant activities. As the CLARITY Act advances, market participants will be watching for concrete milestones—whether a markup date, committee votes, or a White House signing ceremony—that would signal a durable shift toward regulatory certainty.

Readers should watch upcoming statements from lawmakers and industry leaders for clues about the bill’s trajectory, including how negotiators resolve stablecoin yield and other technical details. The next few weeks could prove decisive in determining whether the U.S. crypto sector gains a clear, implementable framework or faces a drawn-out path to regulatory clarity.

A new push for the CLARITY Act is building in Washington as crypto policy supporters warn the timeline may be narrowing. 

Senator Cynthia Lummis said Congress must move soon or risk delaying market structure reform for years.

Lummis said the United States may miss a rare opening to pass the CLARITY Act if lawmakers fail to act soon. She said the bill may not get another real chance until at least 2030.

In a post on X, Lummis wrote, “This is our last chance to pass the Clarity Act until at least 2030.” She added, “We can’t afford to surrender America’s financial future.”

The warning comes as crypto policy supporters watch the political calendar. With US midterm elections set for November, some industry figures fear Congress could shift focus and slow work on crypto legislation.

That concern has kept attention on the bill’s timing. Supporters say the next few months may decide whether the measure advances during the current session.

Former White House AI and crypto czar David Sacks also called for quick action. He said the Senate Banking Committee and the full Senate should move the bill forward.

Sacks said, “The time to act is now. Senate Banking, and then the full Senate, should pass market structure.” He added that he expects President Donald Trump to sign the bill if Congress approves it.

Other industry voices have also backed the legislation. A16z Crypto managing partner Chris Dixon said,

 “when rules are defined, both consumers and entrepreneurs win.”

Immutable founder Robbie Ferguson also backed the bill. On April 3, he said, “the CLARITY Act will make the last decade of growth in gaming look like a joke.”

Senate progress depends on key issues

Coinbase Chief Executive Brian Armstrong said on Friday that “it’s time” for the bill to pass after months of delays. His comment added to fresh calls for movement in the Senate.

Coinbase Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal said on April 2 that the CLARITY Act could be nearing a markup hearing in the Senate Banking Committee. He also said disagreements over stablecoin yield still need to be resolved.

Regulators have also shown support. SEC Chairman Paul Atkins said, 

“It’s time for Congress to future-proof against rogue regulators & advance comprehensive market structure legislation to President Trump’s desk.”

Large investors are accumulating the TRUMP memecoin ahead of an upcoming gala hosted by President Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago on April 28, even as the token trades near record lows and the impending event faces political scrutiny.

Data tracked by blockchain sleuth Lookonchain shows notable whale buying through centralized exchanges. One whale, “8DHkza,” withdrew 850,488 $TRUMP tokens (worth approximately $2.4 million) from Bybit over the past two days. Another address, “7EtuAt,” withdrew 105,754 tokens (around $298,000) from Binance 17 hours ago and currently holds 1.13 million tokens, valued at roughly $3.2 million.

Outflows from exchanges are said to represent investor intention to take direct custody of coins and hold the same for long-term. Hence, outflows are taken to indicate accumulation and potentially reduce immediate sell-side liquidity in the market.

The accumulation comes ahead of an invitation-only luncheon reportedly limited to the top 297 TRUMP token holders, with the top 29 receiving exclusive VIP access to Donald Trump.

However, TRUMP continues to trade at record lows near $2.80, down 0.2% on a 24-hour basis and over 1% in seven days. The token came under pressure this week after CoinDesk reported the Trump-linked crypto venture World Liberty Financial’s controversial lending strategy on the Dolomite DeFi platform.

Meanwhile, U.S. lawmakers have stepped up scrutiny of the Mar-a-Lago event. Senators Elizabeth Warren, Adam Schiff, and Richard Blumenthal have sent a letter to Fight Fight Fight LLC, a Delaware-based entity run by Trump associate Bill Zanker, requesting documents and information on whether Trump played a role in planning, promoting, or financially benefiting from the gathering. Fight Fight Fight LLC TRUMP memecoin in partnership with entities affiliated with Donald Trump.

“It is essential that Congress fully understand the extent to which President Trump and his family are profiting off of his cryptocurrency ventures,” the senators said, adding that “Congress must also take steps to prohibit and prevent these egregious conflicts of interest.”

The probe introduces an additional layer of uncertainty for the token, as regulatory and political risks intersect with already weak price action.

The United States government must pass the CLARITY Act, which aims to provide the crypto industry with clearer regulatory oversight, soon, or risk waiting almost another four years to move the industry forward, according to US Senator Cynthia Lummis.

“This is our last chance to pass the Clarity Act until at least 2030,” Lummis, a well-known crypto advocate, said in an X post on Friday.

“We can’t afford to surrender America’s financial future,” she added. The comments come as crypto industry participants begin to worry that the bill’s chances of passing this year are narrowing, with US midterm elections in November potentially changing congressional priorities and slowing momentum on the highly anticipated crypto legislation.

The former White House AI and crypto czar, David Sacks, also chimed in on Thursday with a similar view to Lummis.

“The time to act is now. Senate Banking, and then the full Senate, should pass market structure. I’m confident that they will. And then President Trump will sign this landmark bill into law,” Sacks said. 

Consumers and entrepreneurs both “win” from the CLARITY Act

Many industry participants have argued that the passage of legislation aimed at clarifying which regulators oversee parts of the crypto industry could lead to greater innovation in the US and potentially increase demand for crypto assets among retail investors.

A16z Crypto managing partner Chris Dixon reiterated that view in a post, saying that “when rules are defined, both consumers and entrepreneurs win.”

A wide range of sectors in the crypto industry expect the move to be positive. 

Web3 gaming giant Immutable founder Robbie Ferguson said just days before, on April 3, that “the CLARITY Act will make the last decade of growth in gaming look like a joke.”

On Friday, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong, who withdrew the crypto exchange’s support for the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act in January, said “it’s time” for the legislation to pass after months of delays.

Meanwhile, Coinbase chief legal officer Paul Grewal said on April 2 that the CLARITY Act could be nearing a markup hearing in the US Senate Banking Committee. However, he noted that progress hinges on resolving disagreements over stablecoin yield.

Related: CFTC unveils innovation task force members in crypto clarity push

Regulators are also voicing their support for the legislation.

US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chairman Paul Atkins said in a post on the same day that, “It’s time for Congress to future-proof against rogue regulators & advance comprehensive market structure legislation to President Trump’s desk.”

Magazine: Bitcoin quantum-safe without upgrade? CZ’s 2031 crypto vision: Hodler’s Digest, April 5 – 11