How strong was the earthquake?

AI is also emerging as a growing threat to crypto companies, giving attackers tools to find vulnerabilities faster, automate attacks and make phishing and social-engineering campaigns more convincing. That raises the stakes for an industry already a frequent target for hackers, while fueling a race to deploy the same technology on the defensive side.

Claude Mythos 5 is Anthropic’s most advanced model for defensive cybersecurity, designed to analyze code at scale, identify vulnerabilities and help developers fix them. Access has initially been limited to organizations that operate or defend critical infrastructure, as Anthropic works on safeguards for a broader rollout.

Payward argued that crypto platforms face security challenges similar to other critical financial infrastructure. Exchanges, custody systems and settlement rails operate around the clock and can present lucrative targets for attackers.

“Security has always been an unfair game. An attacker needs to find one flaw. A defender has to find all of them, first, every single day,” Payward co-CEO Arjun Sethi said in the release. “Frontier AI is the first thing that flips that asymmetry.”

Anthropic has said it plans to expand access to Mythos-class cybersecurity capabilities as it develops safeguards for wider use.

Read more: AI is making crypto security cheaper, faster and harder to ignore

Printr has started closing its token launch platform and will end all operations by Aug. 31 after failing to secure the capital and distribution support needed to continue.

Printr shutdown begins with automatic unstaking

Printr said in an official Aug. 17 X statement that the team had spent the past three months examining possible ways to keep the platform running. According to the company, none provided the funding and distribution backing required under current market conditions.

Starting Aug. 18, the platform will automatically unstake positions held through its supported blockchain integrations. Any staking rewards available for collection will also be claimed, with the assets sent back to the wallet address that originally supplied them.

Users do not need to submit a separate unstaking request under the process described by Printr. Once the returns are completed, the platform will suspend its staking feature and stop accepting new staking activity.

For positions that have not arrived by Aug. 20, Printr instructed affected users to contact its team through the project’s Discord server. Support will remain available only until Aug. 31, giving users a limited period to raise problems involving missing funds or incomplete reward claims.

The notice did not identify every supported chain covered by the automated process or provide separate completion times for each network. Blockchain congestion, unstaking periods, and protocol-level withdrawal rules can differ between chains, making the original wallet address and transaction history important for tracking each return.

Printr app will stop issuing new tokens

After Aug. 31, the Printr application interface will go offline, and users will no longer be able to create tokens through the platform. The company did not announce a buyer, replacement operator, migration process, or another product that would continue its token issuance service.

Tokens previously created through Printr will not disappear with the application. The team explained that each issued token is an independent on-chain asset and is not owned or controlled by Printr, allowing the contracts and balances to remain on their respective networks.

Continued on-chain existence, however, is separate from access to Printr’s interface. Holders may need blockchain explorers, self-custody wallets, or decentralized trading services that support the relevant chain and token contract after the application becomes unavailable.

The company also ruled out a token generation event and an airdrop after the shutdown. Printr users who accumulated points, used the platform, or expected a future distribution will therefore not receive a project token through either route.

No claim page will be opened for such a distribution under the published plan. Users should rely on Printr’s verified channels while the wind-down remains active, particularly because false claim links can seek wallet approvals or private information from communities affected by a project closure.

A similar warning appeared when decentralized exchange aggregator Odos ended its services in July. As earlier closure coverage reported, Odos told users that it would not open a migration page, claim portal, or airdrop during its shutdown and warned that messages offering such services were scams.

Printr raised $4.5 million before closing

The closure comes less than a year after Printr announced a $2 million seed extension that took its reported funding to $4.5 million. An October 2025 funding report listed Printr’s $2 million round among that week’s crypto investments.

Printr had previously raised $2.5 million in a pre-seed round in January 2025. Crypto.news reported the financing at the time alongside other investments in blockchain infrastructure, trading, and yield platforms.

Sfermion, Draper Dragon, Bitscale, Hermeneutic, the Sui Foundation, the Axelar Foundation, and the Flow Foundation participated in the earlier round, according to the funding announcement. Printr, later named Mantle EcoFund, Mirana Ventures, L1D, Sfermion, and Flowdesk among the backers of its $2 million extension, alongside angel investors linked to LayerZero and crypto trading communities.

At its October 2025 product launch, Printr presented itself as a chain-abstracted platform that allowed creators to issue tokens across multiple networks. Supported ecosystems included Ethereum, Solana, Base, BNB Chain, Mantle, and Sui, while Axelar and LayerZero supplied cross-chain infrastructure.

The service combined token creation with cross-chain swaps and bridging tools. Printr also offered a points and rewards program for creators, traders, and users who brought referrals to the platform.

Bybit Venture Studio incubated the project, while Printr announced partnerships with Mantle and Byreal when the product launched. Despite those funding rounds and relationships, the shutdown notice said the company could not obtain enough new capital and distribution support to maintain operations.

Returned rewards may create U.S. tax records

For American users, the automatic return of principal to the same wallet may not carry the same tax treatment as newly claimed staking rewards. The Internal Revenue Service treats digital assets as property and says income received from staking activities is taxable.

IRS guidance also requires taxpayers to keep records showing the date, quantity, and fair market value in U.S. dollars of digital assets received as income. Users whose pending rewards are claimed during Printr’s wind-down may therefore need transaction records showing when the assets reached their wallets and their value at that time.

Under the IRS instructions, transferring assets between wallets owned or controlled by the same person generally does not require a “Yes” answer to the digital-asset question by itself, unless crypto was used to pay a transaction fee. Receiving staking rewards is listed separately as reportable digital-asset activity.

Printr has not published country-specific instructions for the shutdown, so its Aug. 18 unstaking process and Aug. 20 support checkpoint apply according to the wallet-based timetable in its announcement. Another project facing closure, Step App, recently gave users a separate deadline to manage locked positions before services ended, with its shutdown schedule setting Aug. 21 as the final operating date and separate exchange withdrawal cutoffs for FITFI holders.

Fireblocks has appointed former U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Acting Chairman Elad Roisman as its chief regulatory and policy officer and general counsel for regulatory affairs.

Roisman will lead Fireblocks’ regulatory work

Fireblocks said in an Aug. 17 press release that Roisman will direct its regulatory strategy and policy engagement while handling legal matters tied to financial rules. Based in Washington, D.C., he will also represent the company in discussions with regulators and organizations that set industry standards.

Joining the company’s leadership team immediately, Roisman arrives as governments in the United States, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East develop separate rules for stablecoins, tokenized assets, and digital asset services. Fireblocks said such requirements affect the banks, payment providers, and asset managers using its platform to build blockchain-based products.

The company described stablecoins as an established settlement tool for institutions, while tokenized products such as money market funds and private credit have started moving from tests into live financial services. According to the release, banks and asset managers are increasingly placing traditional instruments on blockchain networks, creating additional compliance demands for the infrastructure providers supporting them.

Roisman will serve as Fireblocks’ main point of contact during regulatory discussions affecting those services. His remit covers policy communication as well as legal issues, giving him responsibility for both the company’s engagement with public agencies and its response to rules applied across different markets.

Fireblocks co-founder and CEO Michael Shaulov said experience inside regulatory agencies could help the company communicate with policymakers and support customers as new requirements take effect.

“Having people who understand the mindset and missions of regulators enables us to help inform policymakers and support our clients as rules come into place.”

Referring to stablecoin payments and tokenized real-world assets, Shaulov added that Roisman’s experience as both a regulator and an adviser to financial institutions would help Fireblocks adjust its infrastructure as customers enter regulated areas of digital finance.

Former SEC official brings government and private-sector experience

Before joining Fireblocks, Roisman co-led the digital assets practice at Cravath, Swaine & Moore, where the company said he advised financial institutions and financial technology firms on digital asset regulation. He also testified before Congress on proposed legislation covering the structure of U.S. crypto markets.

During his time at the SEC, Roisman served as a commissioner and acting chairman. The release said he voted on more than 100 rulemaking matters and over 1,000 enforcement actions, while representing the agency before Congress and international organizations.

His international work included engagement with the International Organization of Securities Commissions and the Financial Stability Board, according to Fireblocks. Both organizations participate in discussions concerning financial supervision and the coordination of regulatory standards across national markets.

Prior to joining the SEC, Roisman worked as chief counsel for the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs. He also held a chief counsel role at NYSE Euronext, giving him experience across Congress, a federal market regulator, and a major securities exchange operator.

Roisman said lawmakers and regulators are devoting more attention to rules intended to support activity in the digital asset sector. His work at Fireblocks will include engaging with policymakers as financial institutions develop services under recently adopted and pending laws.

“The work now is engaging with these policymakers on the rapidly evolving digital asset environment and supporting institutions as they build and grow the next phase of the financial system under the new regulations and laws.”

U.S. crypto rules add weight to the appointment

In the United States, Fireblocks has added Roisman while Congress and federal regulators continue to address how digital assets should be issued, traded, and supervised. The company cited federal stablecoin legislation and ongoing negotiations over crypto market structure as two policy areas affecting its institutional customers.

The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act passed the U.S. House by a 294–134 vote in July 2025. According to recent crypto.news coverage, the Senate Banking Committee advanced the legislation by a 15–9 vote in May 2026, but the bill had not received a Senate floor vote before lawmakers left for their August recess.

If enacted, the legislation would define the respective roles of the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission in digital asset markets. It would give the CFTC authority over spot digital commodity trading while leaving digital asset securities under SEC supervision.

Separate regulatory work is also underway inside the SEC. In July, the agency placed three digital asset projects on its 2026 rulemaking agenda, covering crypto offerings, broker-dealers, and market structure, according to an earlier regulatory report. The planned work includes possible exemptions or safe harbors for certain digital asset offerings and potential rule changes for exchanges and alternative trading systems.

Roisman’s role gives Fireblocks a former SEC official as its lead representative during those policy discussions. His previous work before Congress on market structure legislation also places him close to a debate that could determine which federal agency oversees various tokens, trading platforms, and intermediaries.

Stablecoins form a large share of Fireblocks activity

Fireblocks’ regulatory focus also covers stablecoin infrastructure, an area that the company said now accounts for much of the activity handled through its platform. Stablecoins represented 69% of all digital asset transaction volume on Fireblocks during the second quarter of 2026, while USDC had become its leading stablecoin earlier in the year, July reporting showed.

Institutional projects using the platform include a MiCA-compliant euro stablecoin being developed by Qivalis and a group of 12 European banks. The banks selected Fireblocks to provide tokenization, wallet, and lifecycle-management systems, with a launch targeted for the second half of 2026 pending approval from De Nederlandsche Bank, according to April project details.

Fireblocks said the euro project will also use its tools for identity checks and sanctions screening. The group includes banks such as BBVA, BNP Paribas, ING, and UniCredit, while Qivalis plans to operate as an electronic money institution under Dutch supervision.

The company currently supports stablecoin payments, settlement, custody, tokenization, trading, accounting, and compliance reporting across more than 150 blockchain networks. Fireblocks said thousands of organizations use its platform, including Worldpay, BNY, Galaxy, and Revolut, and that it has secured more than $14 trillion in digital asset transactions.

World Liberty Financial has received preliminary OCC approval to establish a national trust bank that would issue USD1, manage its reserves, and provide digital asset custody across the United States.

World Liberty bank cannot open until conditions are met

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency said in its Aug. 14 decision that it had granted preliminary conditional approval for World Liberty Trust Company, National Association. The proposed bank would operate from Bay Harbor Islands, Florida, as a wholly owned subsidiary of Delaware-registered WLTC Holdings LLC.

Preliminary approval permits the company to organize the bank but does not allow it to start operations. The OCC said World Liberty Trust must complete its preopening requirements and obtain final authorization under federal banking law before conducting business.

Until final approval is issued, the regulator can modify, suspend, or withdraw its decision if new information raises concerns. World Liberty Trust must also apply for stock in a Federal Reserve Bank, maintain at least $20 million in eligible capital, and receive the OCC’s written confirmation that all opening conditions have been met.

Under its proposed business plan, World Liberty Trust would issue and redeem the dollar-backed USD1 stablecoin for institutional clients across the country. The bank would also maintain reserves, offer custody services, and let custody customers convert approved stablecoins into USD1 using assets already held with the institution.

World Liberty Trust would not operate as a standard commercial bank. Its proposed charter does not cover ordinary retail deposits or conventional lending, with the business instead limited to trust, custody, reserve, and related payment services.

Citing the National Bank Act and the GENIUS Act, the OCC said national trust banks may provide digital asset custody and issue payment stablecoins. The agency also reported that uninsured national trust banks under its supervision held $7.2 trillion in assets under administration as of March 31, including $1.7 trillion in custody and safekeeping accounts.

USD1 operations would move from BitGo

Once authorized to open, World Liberty Trust plans to replace BitGo Bank & Trust as the exclusive issuer and custodian of USD1. The OCC said the proposed bank would acquire the token’s reserve assets and assume the liabilities tied to them.

Federal rules governing transactions between banks and their affiliates could apply to the transfer. However, the agency approved an exemption from certain limits, collateral rules, and restrictions on low-quality assets under Regulation W as part of its review of the new institution.

BitGo will remain responsible for USD1 issuance and custody until the proposed bank completes the OCC’s conditions. World Liberty Trust would need additional regulatory clearance if the final structure of the reserve transfer triggers other federal bank merger requirements.

For American institutions using USD1, an operating national trust bank would place issuance, reserve management, and custody under direct OCC supervision. Federal status would also let the bank provide its approved services nationwide under one regulator instead of securing separate state permissions.

World Liberty Chairman and President Zach Witkoff said the structure would put USD1’s main functions under the same federal supervisor.

“A national trust bank brings USD1 issuance, custody, and reserve management together under OCC supervision, examined on the same standards that have governed banks for generations.”

Witkoff also said the company welcomed “continuous scrutiny from federal regulators.”

World Liberty has joined several crypto companies pursuing federal trust structures. The OCC conditionally approved applications involving Circle, Ripple, BitGo, Fidelity Digital Assets, and Paxos in December 2025, while Coinbase, Crypto.com, and Stripe-owned Bridge later received similar decisions.

Circle completed its preopening requirements and obtained final authorization for its national trust bank in July. The process shows that conditional approval alone does not permit a proposed institution to begin banking operations.

Trump family ties trigger a Senate bill

Political scrutiny has followed the application because President Donald Trump and his three sons are affiliated with World Liberty. The company’s website has said that a Trump family-linked entity controls about 38% of its equity interests.

Trump nominated Comptroller Jonathan Gould in 2025, leading several Democratic lawmakers to question whether the regulator could review the application independently. Before the decision, Senator Elizabeth Warren asked the OCC to delay its review until Trump gave up his financial interest in the company.

As crypto.news reported in June, Warren challenged Gould during a Senate Banking Committee hearing and argued that the application presented conflict-of-interest and national security concerns. Gould said the agency would follow its legal duties and handle the review through a nonpartisan process.

Addressing the issue in its approval, the OCC said, “the Comptroller and staff acted consistently with their statutory duties and ethical obligations with respect to the Application.” Career agency employees reviewed the filing, while nonpolitical examiners would supervise the bank, according to the decision.

The OCC also disclosed that it received seven comments from four commenters. Two questioned whether the proposed activities fit the legal powers of a national trust bank, while three argued that the public lacked enough information or time to comment.

Agency officials rejected both objections. The decision said World Liberty submitted the required public and confidential information on time, and the comment period complied with federal rules.

After the approval, Warren and nine other senators introduced the Ending Presidential Corruption in Banking Act. The proposal would prevent a president, vice president, their spouses or their children from owning or controlling a bank.

Senate Banking Committee Democrats said the measure would require federal agencies, within 60 days of enactment, to review banking applications approved after Jan. 20, 2025. Regulators would have to terminate an approval issued while a person covered by the bill owned or controlled the applicant.

“This is the most brazen act of self-dealing our financial system has ever seen — and Congress cannot allow it to stand,” Warren said.

The legislation is backed by Senators Chris Van Hollen, Angela Alsobrooks, Chris Murphy, Bernie Sanders, Richard Blumenthal, Jack Reed, Andy Kim, Tammy Duckworth, and Ruben Gallego.

UAE investment remains under congressional review

Congressional questions also cover World Liberty’s foreign investors and its transactions involving USD1. An Abu Dhabi company backed by UAE National Security Adviser Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan reportedly purchased a 49% interest in World Liberty for $500 million through an agreement signed in January 2025.

In June, five Democratic senators requested congressional hearings into the transaction. Their letter asked whether the investment affected subsequent Trump administration decisions involving UAE arms sales and access to advanced artificial intelligence chips.

The OCC said it considered public comments about World Liberty’s non-US investors. Its decision found that the foreign investors were not principal shareholders of the proposed bank, while several investors signed agreements promising not to control or influence its operations.

StringZ Holdings, DT Marks SC, and AMGUS made those commitments in July. Under the agreements, the investors cannot appoint bank employees, seek board seats, obtain material nonpublic information, or influence management decisions, pricing, personnel, and operations.

Eric Trump signed the commitment for DT Marks in his role as president of the Trump family-linked entity. Any voting interest of 10% or more must remain an investment, while voting power above 9.9% would be exercised through a proxy using the same proportion as votes cast by other shareholders.

Separate scrutiny has centered on MGX, another Abu Dhabi entity chaired by Sheikh Tahnoon. MGX used $2 billion in USD1 for an investment in Binance in May 2025, helping increase the stablecoin’s circulation.

A February report on USD1 cited Arkham Intelligence data showing that Binance-controlled wallets and customer accounts held about $4.7 billion of the token, equal to nearly 87% of its $5.4 billion supply at the time. Binance said exchanges commonly hold large amounts of listed assets, while World Liberty and the exchange denied having an improper relationship.

President Trump later pardoned former Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao. A White House spokesperson has repeatedly rejected allegations that Trump’s investments create conflicts, saying his assets are held in a trust managed by his children and that administration decisions are made independently of family business activities.

BitMart’s official Chinese-language X account has publicly demanded that founder Sheldon Xia explain the whereabouts of user funds and produce a repayment plan by Wednesday.

The account said in a Monday post that some users remained unable to withdraw funds and that some employees had not received their final salary or compensation, while calling on Xia to disclose BitMart’s wallets, assets, liabilities and available reserves, according to a machine translation of the post.

The post said if Xia does not provide a verifiable asset disclosure and repayment plan by the deadline, it would continue to submit evidence to regulators, law enforcement, lawyers and the media.

It was unclear who authored Monday’s post or whether the account remained under the company’s control. Cointelegraph contacted BitMart for comment but did not immediately receive a response.

BitMart announced on July 26 that it would wind down its exchange as its BMX token plunged and users reported withdrawal delays. The company said trading on the platform will end on Aug. 26 and operations will cease on Jan. 31.

The exchange has stopped accepting new deposits and registrations as part of the shutdown and warned that some withdrawals could face additional compliance and security reviews.

Related: BitMart withdrawals appear to slow following wind-down announcement

Claims on official account called “fabricated”

Xia responded in an X post on Monday, calling the claims in the post “fabricated rumors” and saying evidence had been preserved, according to a machine translation.

“We have collected full evidence of the content on X, all of which is fabricated rumors. During daytime US time, we will file a police report and send a lawyer’s letter to X, demanding technical and data forensics,” Xia said.

Xia also said employees were not being prioritized over customers in the handling of assets, adding that “everyone is a client” and there were no privileges.

He previously denied that BitMart had misappropriated user assets. On Aug. 8, Xia told users not to believe unverified claims or screenshots purportedly provided by current or former employees.

Wallets attributed to BitMart by Arkham held about $36.5 million in crypto assets as of Monday, down from roughly $71 million on July 26 and $102 million on July 6.

The tracked wallets may not represent all assets controlled by BitMart, and it is unclear how much of the decline reflects customer withdrawals, asset consolidation or transfers to other wallets.

This is a developing story.

Hodler’s Digest: Data of 54,000 wallet users leaked, CLARITY odds just 10%

Truth Ventures CEO Varun Datta has urged crypto investors not to demand recurring revenue from seed-stage companies, as RootData has listed 99 crypto projects that closed, entered bankruptcy, or became inactive in 2026.

RootData listed 99 crypto projects that had announced closures, entered bankruptcy, or remained unavailable for long periods by late July, according to a recent crypto.news report. The database includes several types of inactivity, meaning its total should not be presented as 99 insolvencies.

As companies disappear from several parts of the market, investors are examining whether crypto products can retain users and support operating costs without depending on rising token prices. Datta told crypto.news that such tests may be suitable for established businesses but could produce the wrong assessment when applied to companies at the start of their development.

“The market shakeout is evident, but the lessons we are learning primarily apply to established companies. It is unfair to expect a new team to show recurring revenue. They are simply too early in their journey for those metrics.”

His comments draw a distinction between accepting an unworkable business and recognising that a new company may not have had enough time to build recurring income. Applying revenue standards designed for a later funding round to a pre-seed company, he said, could prevent investors from examining the qualities that matter at its current stage.

Crypto investors are putting more money into mature companies

Galaxy Research reported that venture firms invested about $4 billion across 355 crypto and blockchain deals during the first quarter of 2026. Funding declined 50% from the previous quarter, while the number of deals fell 16%.

According to Galaxy, the difference between the two declines resulted mainly from a reduction in large, later-stage financings after a strong fourth quarter. Smaller seed and early-stage deals continued, although later-stage companies received 57% of invested capital, leaving 43% for younger businesses.

Pre-seed rounds accounted for 19% of completed deals, while later-stage transactions rose to one-quarter of the total. Galaxy said the increase in the later-stage share indicated that parts of the crypto industry were maturing, even as new projects continued to secure funding.

Available capital is also concentrated in a small number of business categories. Trading, exchange, investing, and lending companies collected about $2.6 billion, close to three-fifths of all crypto VC money deployed during the quarter.

Infrastructure companies completed 56 deals, the second-highest total by category. Web3, NFT, decentralized autonomous organization, metaverse, and gaming companies followed with 39 transactions, while payment and rewards businesses recorded 33.

April data offered another example of capital concentration. As fundraising figures showed, centralized finance companies raised about $606 million of the approximately $860 million disclosed across 55 crypto funding events that month. Infrastructure companies secured $105 million across 14 deals, while DeFi businesses raised $90 million across 19.

Seed startups require a different investment test

For Datta, early-stage investors should begin with the founder’s knowledge of the problem rather than revenue figures that may not exist. Product design and the value delivered to users, he said, provide more suitable evidence when a company has only recently begun operating.

“At the seed stage, the real indicator of success has never been revenue. It stems from the founder’s profound understanding of the problem at hand.”

Products must solve a genuine problem instead of using a token as the main fundraising tool, according to the venture capitalist. He attributed the failure of many crypto projects to attempts to replace a working commercial model with speculation around their tokens.

Datta described such failures as problems of vision rather than proof that early-stage investing itself is defective. In his view, protecting seed companies from unsuitable revenue tests does not require investors to overlook weak products or teams.

“This isn’t about protecting weak businesses,” he said. “It reminds investors not to use growth-stage criteria for brand-new startups.”

Under the approach outlined by Datta, investors would examine how a product could gain users before its available capital runs out. They would also assess whether the founders have identified a route from initial product development to a company capable of supporting itself.

Reviewing an existing revenue statement would be easier, he said, but venture firms backing new companies must evaluate an unproven plan with limited operating data. Datta described the process as an essential part of early-stage venture investing.

Crypto venture funds are competing for limited allocations

Galaxy also found that crypto-focused venture firms raised about $1.1 billion across eight new funds during the first quarter. The number of newly raised funds was the lowest recorded since the third quarter of 2020.

Fundraising conditions remained difficult because AI companies, spot crypto exchange-traded products, and digital asset treasury businesses competed for institutional allocations, according to the research firm. If the first-quarter pace continued for a full year, crypto venture funds would raise about $4 billion in 2026, below the $8.75 billion raised in 2025.

Competition for capital has not removed investor interest in companies serving a specific commercial market. In a separate interview, Moon Pursuit Capital founder Utkarsh Ahuja said investors should separate scientific progress from a business model that customers will pay to use. The infrastructure funding discussion covered security, cryptography, and quantum-readiness companies, but Ahuja said such businesses still require an adoption plan that does not depend on a rapid technical breakthrough.

Galaxy found that the median crypto deal exceeded $4.5 million in the first quarter, its highest recorded level. However, the research firm cautioned that valuation information was available for only 12% of completed deals and leaned heavily toward later-stage companies.

US crypto startups captured 70% of invested capital

US-headquartered companies received 70.2% of all crypto venture capital deployed during the first quarter, according to Galaxy. American companies also accounted for 43.5% of completed deals, followed by the United Kingdom at 5.3% and Singapore at 4.5%.

The US figures indicate that decisions over seed-stage requirements could have a particularly large effect on American crypto founders seeking institutional backing. Galaxy’s data does not show which individual screening standards investors applied, but it establishes that most capital flowed to companies based in the United States.

Datta said early investors should focus on companies building toward sustainable models across Web3 and AI. Truth Ventures invests from pre-seed through later Series rounds, according to the CEO, with an emphasis on founders developing products around identifiable problems.

The firm’s stated investment focus includes Web3 infrastructure, decentralized applications, and digital financial systems. Datta said Truth Ventures is accepting pitches from infrastructure founders while working with companies from their initial ideas through subsequent growth rounds.