Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

OKX Launches Native AI Layer on OnchainOS to Power Autonomous Blockchain Agents

Published

on

Nexo Partners with Bakkt for US Crypto Exchange and Yield Programs

TLDR:

  • OKX’s OnchainOS now supports AI agents across 60+ networks with 99.9% uptime and 1.2B daily API calls.
  • Developers can access OnchainOS through AI Skills, MCP Protocol, or a direct Open API for full control.
  • The x402 payment protocol enables AI agents to settle transactions autonomously with zero gas fees on X Layer.
  • Smart trade routing across 500+ DEXs allows agents to find the best swap prices without human involvement.

OnchainOS, OKX’s developer toolkit, now features a native AI layer built for autonomous blockchain operations. The update opens OKX Wallet and its decentralized exchange infrastructure to AI agents.

Developers can now program agents to manage wallets, execute trades, process payments, and read live market data.

The system runs on infrastructure already serving more than 12 million monthly wallet users. This move positions OKX as a central platform for onchain automation.

Three Access Methods Power the New AI Layer

OnchainOS gives developers three distinct ways to build with AI agents. Through AI Skills, agents interact with onchain services using plain language commands.

No complex API wiring or blockchain configuration is required. This lowers the entry barrier for teams newer to Web3 development.

Advertisement

The second method is through MCP, or Model Context Protocol. This connects OnchainOS directly to AI agents and large language model applications.

Major frameworks, including Claude Code and Cursor, can call onchain actions natively through this channel. Developers working within existing AI environments gain immediate access to blockchain functionality.

OKX stated through its official channels: “We are opening OKX Wallet and DEX to enable AI Agents. Our OnchainOS now has a full AI layer that developers can use to enable AI agents for new applications.”

The third option is a direct Open API, providing full RESTful programmatic access. Developers who need granular control over every platform capability can use this route.

Advertisement

It supports custom integrations without relying on higher-level abstractions. Together, the three methods cover a broad range of development workflows.

Autonomous Workflow Capabilities Built on Proven Infrastructure

OnchainOS routes trades across more than 500 decentralized exchanges automatically. The system identifies the best available price on every swap in real time.

Market data covers tokens, trades, transfers, and account activity across chains. Agents can act on this data without requiring human interpretation at any step.

Payments within the platform are built on the x402 protocol. This allows AI agents to initiate and settle transactions without manual involvement.

Advertisement

Transactions executed on OKX’s native X Layer chain carry zero gas fees. That makes high-frequency, machine-speed payments practical for automated agent workflows.

The infrastructure behind OnchainOS processes more than 1.2 billion API calls daily. It supports around $300 million in daily trading volume with sub-100ms response times.

The platform maintains 99.9% uptime across more than 60 blockchain networks. These metrics reflect a production-grade foundation that AI agents can operate on reliably.

Developers building on OnchainOS can deploy once across all supported chains. No chain-specific rewiring is needed when expanding agent operations to new networks.

Advertisement

As a result, the distance between what AI agents can do and what they can dependably execute onchain continues

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Ansem Says Ethereum Is in a Worse Spot Than 2023 as Thesis Weakens

Published

on

Ethereum Price Prediction

Crypto analyst Ansem argues that Ethereum (ETH) is in a “worse spot” in 2026 than it was in 2023, pointing to a thesis he says has been eroding for years.

His bearish take drew rebuttals from some members of the community. Meanwhile, on-chain activity and technical indicators elsewhere on the network flash bullish signals.

Ansem Lists Cracks in the ETH Thesis

Ansem argues that Solana (SOL) has dominated retail activity this cycle. Hyperliquid has taken the lead in perpetual futures trading, while rollups have failed to gain traction.

He also noted that Vitalik Buterin “publicly abandoned” the general-use rollup thesis. The ongoing Aave (AAVE) situation around the KelpDAO rsETH exploit, Ansem said, is a mark on  Ethereum’s core value proposition of “safety + security of defi & insto interest.

Advertisement

“ETH thesis has been weakening consistently for years,” the analyst wrote. ETH in 2026 is in a worse spot than it was in 2023, amplified by AI doing extremely well & tech stocks being much more favorable investments with real revenues / emerging narratives / increasing momentum, ETH is a $300B asset with a ton of overhang from Tom Lee topblasting + complacent ETH holders sitting idle in defi protocols.”

Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens

Technically, the analyst noted that ETH remains in a sustained downtrend after failing to break multi-year resistance. He projected that the second-largest cryptocurrency could slip to 2025 lows near $1,300 and to the bear-market lows from 2022.

“Tight invalidation 2377 assuming problems worsen if you want to play it loose assuming other risk assets continues doing well & drags it up probably somewhere around 2700/2800 invalidation fundamentals wise would want to see breakout activity from some new vertical,” the post read.

Ethereum Price Prediction
Ethereum Price Prediction. Source: X/Ansem

Community Members Push Back

The take triggered notable pushback. Ryan Berckmans accused Ansem of not understanding fundamentals. Leo Lanza went further, sharply dismissing the analyst’s bearish case on X.

Another user pointed to a 56% drop in the SOL/ETH pair this cycle.

Advertisement

“Soleth is down 56% after being up 12x+ *this cycle* because one guy decided to buy 5% of the eth supply after it had underperformed all cycle. idk why you guys act like i dont also bearpost solana i havent posted anything bullish about sol in over a year,” Ansem replied.

Not everyone shares the bearish view on Ethereum. BeInCrypto recently highlighted that network activity remains strong, while technical indicators like the Rainbow Chart and MACD are also flashing bullish signals.

With macro and geopolitical uncertainty still in play, the question is whether ETH slides further this year or stages a renewed rally.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel to watch leaders and journalists provide expert insights

The post Ansem Says Ethereum Is in a Worse Spot Than 2023 as Thesis Weakens appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Aave’s TVL Falls $8B After $293M Kelp DAO Hack

Published

on

Aave’s TVL Falls $8B After $293M Kelp DAO Hack

Total value locked on decentralized lending protocol Aave dropped by nearly $8 billion over the weekend after hackers behind the $293 million Kelp DAO exploit borrowed funds on Aave, leaving roughly $195 million in “bad debt” on the protocol and triggering withdrawals.

Data from DeFiLlama shows that Aave’s TVL fell from about $26.4 billion to $18.6 billion by Sunday, losing the top spot as the largest DeFi protocol. 

Aave v3’s lending pools for USDt (USDT) and USDC (USDC) are now at 100% utilization, meaning that more than $5.1 billion worth of stablecoins cannot be withdrawn until new liquidity arrives or borrows are repaid. 

$2,540 is available to be withdrawn from the $2.87 billion USDT pool on Aave v3 at the time of writing. Source: Aave

Aave’s TVL fall shows how rapidly risk from a single security incident can spread throughout the broader, interconnected DeFi lending market, potentially leading to a severe liquidity crisis.

The incident began on Saturday when hackers stole 116,500 Kelp DAO Restaked ETH (rsETH) tokens worth about $293 million from Kelp DAO’s LayerZero-powered bridge and used them as collateral on Aave v3 to borrow wrapped Ether (wETH).

Advertisement

Crypto analytics platform Lookonchain said the move created about $195 million in “bad debt” on Aave, which contributed to the Aave (AAVE) token tanking nearly 20% from $112 on Saturday at 6:00 pm UTC to $89.5 about 25 hours later. 

Lookonchain noted that some of the largest crypto whales to withdraw funds from Aave were the MEXC crypto exchange and Abraxas Capital at $431 million and $392 million, respectively.

Source: Grvt

Several crypto networks and protocols tied to rsETH or the LayerZero bridge have paused use of the bridge until the problem is resolved, including DeFi platform Curve Finance, stablecoin issuer Ethena and BitGo’s Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC).

Aave has frozen several rsETH, wETH markets

Shortly after the Kelp DAO exploit, Aave said it froze the rsETH markets on both Aave v3 and v4 to prevent any suspicious borrowing and later stated that rsETH on Ethereum mainnet remains fully backed by underlying assets.

WETH reserves also remain frozen on Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base, Mantle and Linea, Aave said.

Advertisement

This incident marks the first significant stress test of Aave’s “Umbrella” security model, which was introduced in June 2025 to provide automated protection against protocol bad debt while enabling users to earn rewards.

Related: Aave DAO backs V4 mainnet plan in near-unanimous vote

Earlier this month, the Bank of Canada found that Aave avoided bad debt in its v3 market by using overcollateralization, automated liquidations and other strategies that shifted risk to borrowers.

In comments to Cointelegraph, Aave defended its liquidation-based model, framing it as a core safety mechanism that protects lenders while limiting downside for borrowers.

Advertisement

It comes as Aave parted ways with its longest-standing DeFi risk service provider, Chaos Labs, on April 6, following disagreements over the direction of Aave v4 and budget constraints.

Magazine: Are DeFi devs liable for the illegal activity of others on their platforms?