Anthropic is reportedly in discussions with Nvidia about a potential $10 billion investment that could help shape what Reuters called a potential “mega IPO” for the AI company. According to Reuters, citing people familiar with the matter, the talks are still fluid and the figures being discussed could materially reshape the size—and potential valuation—of any public debut.

Reuters also reports that Anthropic is seeking to raise as much as $100 billion in the offering, which could value the company at around $2 trillion. The individuals described the negotiations as confidential and asked not to be identified, and Reuters said Anthropic declined to comment while Nvidia had not yet responded to a request for comment.

Key takeaways

• Reuters reports Anthropic is discussing a possible $10 billion Nvidia investment tied to a potentially massive IPO.
• The offering size under discussion could reach up to $100 billion, implying an around $2 trillion valuation target.
• Talks remain ongoing and could change, with neither Anthropic nor Nvidia providing comment.
• The rumored move fits a broader strategy in which chip makers seek influence not just over compute, but also AI platforms and customers.

Why a potential Nvidia-Anthropic deal matters

If the reported discussions result in participation by Nvidia—potentially as an early strategic backer—it would strengthen more than just Anthropic’s funding prospects. Strategic investors often have outsized influence in how companies position their technology and partnerships, especially in fast-moving AI supply chains where chips, infrastructure, model ecosystems, and developer tools can be just as important as model performance.

For Nvidia, a relationship with Anthropic at a scale that could support a record-setting public offering would be consistent with its push to stay tightly embedded in the AI stack. Reuters’ account suggests Nvidia could benefit by reinforcing ties with a major customer while also taking a more prominent role around the timing and structure of an IPO.

Link to Anthropic’s infrastructure footprint

Earlier coverage from Cointelegraph highlighted Anthropic’s increasing demand for AI compute capacity. On Aug. 11, Cointelegraph reported that Bitcoin miner Riot Platforms had secured a 20-year agreement to supply 191 megawatts of capacity from its Rockdale, Texas campus to a “leading frontier AI” company.

Cointelegraph stated that the customer was Anthropic and that the deal was valued at about $9 billion, citing a Bloomberg report that also referenced people familiar with the matter. While such capacity agreements don’t automatically translate into IPO readiness, they can signal the scale of near-term compute requirements—an issue that matters to investors assessing how quickly an AI company can sustain growth in training and inference.

Nvidia’s software leverage and the Hugging Face acquisition

The Nvidia angle in this story also connects to its broader strategy beyond chips. Earlier in August, Cointelegraph reported that Nvidia had agreed to acquire Hugging Face for $12.9 billion, extending its reach into the AI software and developer tooling ecosystem.

Hugging Face, as described in Cointelegraph’s earlier reporting and in remarks by Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, serves more than 18 million developers and hosts over three million models. Huang said Nvidia to acquire Hugging Face would bring control of a major platform for AI models as AI companies increasingly compete across chips, software, and the developer tools used to build and deploy models.

In that context, the Reuters report—if confirmed—would underline a two-pronged approach: Nvidia aims to maintain leverage at the infrastructure level and also deepen its influence over the software layers where models are published, accessed, and integrated into applications.

What to watch next

Because Reuters characterizes the negotiations as ongoing and potentially changeable, investors and industry participants should watch for follow-on reporting that clarifies whether Nvidia is expected to participate formally, how the offering size would be structured, and whether either company provides updated statements as talks progress. The broader implication—however it plays out—remains clear: AI capital formation and strategic partnerships are increasingly shaped by control of both compute and the platforms developers rely on.

Nigel Farage’s Reform UK has received a total of £72 million (about $97 million) from two crypto-linked billionaires, after Christopher Harborne matched a record donation initially announced by Ben Delo. The pair’s contributions are described as the largest ever given to a British political party, according to reporting cited in the original coverage.

Harborne announced on Saturday that he would donate £36 million, following Delo’s earlier announcement. Reuters reported Farage’s response, noting that Reform welcomed the donations as a way to ensure the party can compete in the upcoming political fight.

Key takeaways

• Reform UK received £72 million total, combining contributions of £36 million each from Ben Delo and Christopher Harborne.
• Harborne matched Delo’s donation after Delo announced his package the day earlier.
• The funding is framed by Reform as enabling a “level playing field” for the next general election campaign.
• The donations come amid ongoing political scrutiny in the UK over crypto-linked financial influence, following an earlier Farage scandal.
• Delo’s background includes a US legal resolution tied to BitMEX-related charges and a later presidential pardon, per earlier Cointelegraph reporting.

Why the donations are drawing attention

The scale of the donations is itself notable: the combined £72 million is presented in the original report as the largest ever made to a British political party, underscoring how quickly Reform has become a focal point for debates over money in UK politics.

Harborne said he was motivated to match Delo’s donation and, according to a quote carried by The Telegraph in the underlying report, he expected no direct personal outcome—describing it as support for a party “ready for government.” Delo, a co-founder of the BitMEX cryptocurrency exchange, said he wanted to help ensure a “fair fight” at the polls.

In remarks attributed to The Telegraph, the funding timeline was also used to manage risk around potential legal or administrative interruption. Delo described the donation as effectively £1 million per month until a general election expected in 2029, but said he paid the entire amount up front so it could not be blocked, rather than drip-feeding funds over time.

Reform’s “level playing field” argument

Farage welcomed both donations, stating that the money would allow Reform to contest the next general election on “a level playing field,” Reuters reported. That framing is important for understanding how Reform is positioning the contributions: rather than describing them as advantage-making capital, the party’s leadership is presenting the donations as a mechanism to counterbalance the resources of other parties.

However, the political context is not purely about campaign budgeting. The original coverage points to heightened scrutiny from UK lawmakers after Reform became associated with crypto-linked figures and large transfers during a period that has already seen contested discussion about whether digital-asset money should be treated differently under UK campaign finance rules.

Scrutiny after the earlier crypto funding controversy

Last month, Cointelegraph reported that Farage was under investigation after receiving millions of dollars in donations and gifts connected to the crypto industry. The underlying reporting cited Christopher Harborne and George Cottrell among the figures tied to the controversy, while noting that Farage denied wrongdoing.

Cointelegraph also reported that Farage resigned as a Member of Parliament in July amid the crypto scandal. The resignation triggered a by-election that Farage won with 63% of the vote, according to the original piece, ahead of a satirical candidate known as Count Binface.

Beyond individual allegations, the donations have intensified broader concerns among lawmakers about the potential influence of digital assets on UK political decision-making. In the underlying report, it was noted that Labour MPs were reportedly considering making a crypto-donation moratorium—announced in March pending legislation—permanent, in response to what Farage characterized as “gifts” from Harborne and Cottrell.

Taken together, the new donations place Reform’s campaign financing squarely inside an active policy debate: whether limits on crypto-related political giving are necessary, and how any such limits might be enforced in practice as crypto industry figures continue to engage with UK electoral politics.

Delo’s US legal history and pardon

The wider scrutiny around the donation also intersects with the personal legal history of one of the donors. Earlier Cointelegraph reporting stated that Delo was one of three BitMEX co-founders who pleaded guilty in the US to federal charges tied to violations of the Bank Secrecy Act.

That reporting added that Delo agreed to pay a $10 million fine in 2022 but did not serve prison time. It further noted that Delo, alongside Arthur Hayes and Samuel Reed, later received a presidential pardon from then-President Donald Trump in March 2025.

While the donation news is focused on UK politics, this US dimension is relevant for readers trying to understand why crypto-linked political contributions are polarizing: the donations are not only raising questions about UK campaign finance oversight, but also resurfacing attention to the donors’ broader regulatory and legal track records.

Looking ahead, investors, voters, and political watchers will likely focus on two practical questions: whether UK authorities or lawmakers introduce additional restrictions on crypto-related political donations, and how Reform responds to ongoing inquiries as the party prepares for the next general election. The larger issue behind the headline figure is how—or whether—crypto money will be treated as ordinary political funding as the debate over fairness and influence continues to escalate.

North Korea’s cyber and financial theft efforts are increasingly relying on remote workers based in third countries, according to a report published by NBC. The scheme reportedly involves recruiting foreign IT workers—such as people located in Iran and Lebanon—to help North Korean-linked actors infiltrate US companies and route funds back to the DPRK in support of its weapons programs.

The renewed focus on “outsourced” digital labor comes after a July alert issued by the US government and multiple foreign agencies, warning that North Korean IT workers actively seek contracts with the aim of remitting salaries to parent agencies in North Korea. The alert also described these workers as potential insider threats, including roles in data exfiltration and cryptocurrency theft.

Key takeaways

• US and partner agencies warned in July that DPRK-linked IT workers use employment contracts to funnel pay back to North Korean agencies.
• NBC reports North Korea is using remote workers from third countries—reportedly including Iran and Lebanon—to pass job interviews and gain access to US firms.
• After contracts are obtained, NBC says North Korean operatives often take over the positions.
• The reported tactics extend to cryptocurrency theft, with some candidates allegedly being offered crypto compensation for part-time work.
• Broader reporting ties North Korea’s cyber operations to large crypto losses, underscoring how persistent these campaigns can be.

A US warning highlights contract-driven infiltration

The July alert cited by NBC frames the DPRK’s approach as more than typical hacking. Instead, it emphasizes how North Korean-linked IT workers attempt to gain entry through normal business channels—seeking contracts and leveraging employment relationships to access internal systems.

According to the alert, these workers “seek out contracts with the intent of remitting their salaries to their parent North Korean agencies.” It also describes them as posing an insider threat to companies, with participation in data exfiltration and cryptocurrency theft, as well as the theft of sensitive information. That combination points to a multi-stage method: gain a role legitimately or semi-legitimately, then convert that access into monetizable outcomes and compromised data.

Third-country remote staffing as a growing tactic

NBC reports that as governments have moved to counter DPRK efforts, the strategy has shifted toward recruiting remote IT workers from outside North Korea. The report says foreign workers are scouted—NBC specifically mentions LinkedIn—as North Korean-linked actors attempt to recruit people who can pass initial screening and interviews for remote positions.

Once those work contracts are obtained, NBC says the remote workers are typically followed by a transfer of control, with the roles then “usually” taken over by North Korean operatives. For firms hiring contractors—particularly those operating across borders—this is an important nuance: the risk is not only external malware or credential theft. It also includes what happens after a contractor is onboarded and gains legitimate access to development environments, internal documentation, or payment-related workflows.

NBC also reports that some of the foreign recruits were offered cryptocurrency—about $500 monthly in at least one case—in exchange for part-time work, described as “interview associates.” That detail matters for compliance teams: it suggests intermediated recruitment and payment schemes may be used to normalize crypto transfers in otherwise ordinary hiring processes.

The July alert’s themes—remittance intent, insider-threat potential, and links to crypto theft—appear consistent with what NBC portrays as a practical hiring pipeline. If implemented as described, the scheme reduces friction for DPRK actors by blending into legitimate commercial operations while still creating pathways to exfiltrate data and move value.

Crypto losses connected to DPRK activity remain substantial

The hiring/infiltration angle is part of a broader pattern that has repeatedly surfaced in cybersecurity reporting. Cointelegraph previously reported in May, citing CrowdStrike, that North Korean state-affiliated hackers were responsible for more than $2 billion in crypto losses in 2025—an estimated 51% increase year-on-year.

While the NBC report focuses on recruitment and insider access, the continued magnitude of crypto losses—per the CrowdStrike-cited figure—suggests that monetization channels (including cryptocurrency-related theft) remain a central goal. In practice, insider positioning and data access can accelerate theft by expanding the target set: not only wallets and exchanges, but also internal systems that may contain credentials, private keys, payment rails, or proprietary information that can be leveraged for further attacks.

For crypto investors and market participants, this matters because large-scale theft and follow-on laundering attempts can affect confidence in compliance and custody systems, and they can increase perceived regulatory pressure on the broader industry. Even when theft is confined to specific victims, the ecosystem-level narrative tends to build around repeat offenders and persistent attack methods.

Sanctions pressures, but limited signs of economic slowdown

Alongside the cyber narrative, economic reporting suggests sanctions have not prevented North Korea from sustaining activity at home. Cointelegraph previously noted, citing the Bank of Korea, that North Korea’s GDP increased 3.5% in 2025 despite global sanctions.

That estimate doesn’t prove the cyber recruitment scheme directly caused macro outcomes—but it provides context for why such operations may remain attractive to the DPRK. If the country’s economy is not collapsing under sanctions, then actors may have continued resources and incentives to invest in complex infiltration strategies that require coordination across borders and jurisdictions.

From a risk-management perspective, this implies that defensive measures must be ongoing. If North Korea can adjust recruitment tactics—shifting to remote third-country workers and using crypto compensation for part-time roles—then security teams should expect further evolution in how these threats blend into normal business processes.

What companies should watch next

As the details reported by NBC and the July alert suggest contract-based insider risk tied to crypto remittances, the most urgent question for employers and vendors is how these schemes will be detected in practice. Firms should track warning signals around contractor onboarding—especially scenarios involving unusually fast access to sensitive systems, crypto-focused payment arrangements, or patterns consistent with insider takeover after initial screening—while cybersecurity and compliance teams closely monitor how DPRK-linked recruiting methods develop.