Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Crypto World

Polymarket’s Fee Overhaul Pushes Daily Revenue Past $1 Million

Published

on

Polymarket’s daily fee revenue crossed $1 million on April 1, just two days after the platform expanded taker fees to nearly all market categories.

The surge, up from $696,000 on March 31, followed the March 30 rollout of variable taker fees across politics, finance, economics, culture, weather, and tech markets.

From Growth Play to Revenue Machine

Polymarket previously charged fees only on crypto and sports contracts. The updated structure applies a dynamic, probability-based model in which fees peak at 50% probability of the outcome and drop near the extremes.

Crypto markets carry the steepest rate at 1.80%, while sports remain the lowest at 0.75%.

Advertisement
Upcoming Polymarket Fee Structure. Source: Polymarket
Upcoming Polymarket Fee Structure. Source: Polymarket

Makers pay nothing. Instead, they receive daily USDC rebates of 20% to 25% of collected fees, depending on the category. Geopolitics and world events remain entirely fee-free.

On-chain analyst DefiOasis noted that April 1 fees reached $927,000 on Dune Analytics, translating to an annualized run rate of roughly $338 million.

“The latest full single-day fee on April 1 was $927,000, and it is expected that single-day fees could exceed $1 million in the coming days. Based on the April 1 single-day fee, Polymarket’s annualized equivalent reaches $338 million,” the analyst noted.

DefiLlama data placed the figure even higher, at $1.07 million.

Polymarket Daily Fees. Source. Source: DefiLlama

Competition Heats Up Across Chains

The fee shift arrives as prediction markets draw new entrants. Binance Wallet began beta-testing an in-app prediction feature through Predict Fun (Predict.fun), a BNB Smart Chain protocol that saw $7.68 million in net inflows on a single day after the integration.

Predict Fun’s open interest rebounded to $23 million, according to DefiOasis.

Monthly prediction market volume now exceeds $20 billion industrywide.

Advertisement

The sector’s rapid monetization, from Polymarket’s fee expansion to Kalshi’s reported $1.5 billion annualized run rate, signals a broader transition from subsidized growth to sustainable revenue.

Whether Polymarket can sustain above $1 million in daily fees will depend on trading volume resilience as takers adjust to the new cost structure.

The post Polymarket’s Fee Overhaul Pushes Daily Revenue Past $1 Million appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Bitcoin Treasury Market Still Hosts Carnival Barkers

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

The rapidly evolving Bitcoin treasury space finds itself at a crossroads, split between funds with deployable capital strategies and a wave of promotional narratives. In a candid interview at BitcoinVegas, Sean Bill, co-founder of the Bitcoin treasury vehicle BSTR alongside Adam Back, warned that many peers may be overpromising and underdelivering on practical deployment of Bitcoin.

“A lot of them don’t have the right capital structure to actually deploy Bitcoin,” Bill told Cointelegraph in a YouTube interview published this week. “They’re really planning on having Bitcoin do all the talking for them. I do think that you have a lot of carnival barkers in this space.”

Bill argued that the value proposition for a treasury-focused firm hinges on more than simply holding Bitcoin. While cheap and easy leverage can prop up value, a company without a credible mechanism to deploy capital risks losing investor interest to simpler products—such as Bitcoin exchange-traded products—when price makes the narrative harder to justify after the initial hype fades.

The ongoing debate surrounding Bitcoin treasuries has become one of the cycle’s most-discussed narratives. While corporate holdings have driven demand and visibility for Bitcoin, they also raise questions about systemic risk and market integrity as the sector matures.

Advertisement

In a June 3, 2025 note to investors, Geoff Kendrick, head of digital assets at Standard Chartered Bank, warned that a sharp drop in Bitcoin’s price could trigger sizable liquidations within treasury-linked strategies. He also noted that regulatory developments and broader market maturation may erode the premium that has historically accompanied Bitcoin proxy stocks. The takeaway for market participants is clear: a shift from speculative hype to disciplined capital deployment could redefine how these vehicles are valued in the years ahead.

Bitcoin treasury data underscores the sector’s scale and concentration. According to BitcoinTreasuries, 198 public companies collectively hold about 1.25 million BTC. Among them, Michael Saylor’s Strategy is listed as the largest public corporate holder, with a treasury of 843,738 BTC.

Recent coverage has highlighted the fragility of some listed vehicles. Cointelegraph reported that Nakamoto (NAKA) stock, a prominent Bitcoin treasury-listed company, slid roughly 67% year-to-date and more than 99% from its May 2025 peak of around $34 per share. The stock traded near $0.16 in April before a reverse stock split, a move that drew attention from investors and market observers. Nasdaq had warned of possible delisting after trading below $1 for 30 consecutive days, according to an SEC filing.

These dynamics illuminate the tension between narrative-driven momentum and the realities of capital markets. As more capital programs come online, the sector’s ability to deploy capital prudently—and to withstand downside risk—will increasingly determine which players survive the next cycle.

Advertisement

For readers tracking this space, the broader question remains: will the Bitcoin treasury model evolve into a disciplined, capital-allocating ecosystem that stands on its own merits, or will it rely on continued price momentum and promotional narratives to attract capital?

Key takeaways

  • The Bitcoin treasury sector is bifurcating between firms with credible capital deployment strategies and those leaning on promotional narratives without robust capital structures.
  • Without real deployment options, some companies risk losing investor interest to straightforward Bitcoin products like ETFs, especially in softer macro conditions.
  • Analysts warn that a sharp price decline could trigger forced liquidations in treasury strategies, while regulatory and market maturation may erode premium pricing for Bitcoin proxy stocks.
  • BitcoinTreasuries tallies show 198 public companies holding about 1.25 million BTC; the largest holder is described as Michael Saylor’s Strategy with 843,738 BTC.
  • Illustrative cases like Nakamoto (NAKA) illustrate liquidity and delisting risks in this niche, underscoring the need for robust corporate governance and sustainable capital plans.

A split in the Bitcoin treasury landscape

Sean Bill’s critique centers on the structural viability of treasury programs. He contends that a credible firm must demonstrate an actionable plan to deploy Bitcoin into productive use—whether through yield-generating mechanisms, strategic hedging, or disciplined capitalization—rather than relying on Bitcoin’s price appreciation alone to justify value. In his view, “carnival barkers” may generate short-term buzz but fail to deliver durable value for long-term investors.

The industry’s narrative is closely tied to Bitcoin’s own price journey and the broader appetite for crypto exposure via listed vehicles. As Treasury strategies proliferate, the question becomes whether the market will reward tangible capital deployment and governance rigor or reward spectacle and marketing hype. This debate matters for investors seeking diversification within crypto and for builders crafting transparent, risk-aware treasury programs.

Regulatory and market maturation: what changes the calculus?

Market observers point to the Standard Chartered assessment as a reminder that the space cannot remain purely narrative-driven. A potential price shock could trigger liquidity events that ripple through treasury portfolios, particularly when leverage and margin facilities are employed. At the same time, regulatory clarity and market maturation could compress the premium that investors have historically paid for Bitcoin proxy exposure, pushing capital toward products and protocols that demonstrate resilience beyond hype.

The evolving regulatory backdrop is thus as important as Bitcoin’s price action for treasury strategies. As this segment matures, investors will demand greater transparency on reserve management, risk controls, and the ability to deploy capital productively under varied market conditions.

Advertisement

Scale, concentration, and the Nakamoto case

The BitcoinTreasuries dataset paints a picture of scale and concentration. With nearly 1.25 million BTC across 198 public companies, the sector remains dominated by a few large holders. The largest, described in industry data as Michael Saylor’s Strategy, holds 843,738 BTC, underscoring how a small number of large treasury positions can shape market perception and capital flows.

The Nakamoto case provides a cautionary counterpoint. The stock’s steep decline and the delisting risk highlighted the fragility that can accompany publicly traded Bitcoin treasury vehicles. The intersection of stock market mechanics and crypto exposure remains a delicate space where governance, liquidity, and valuation interact in complex ways.

As readers monitor these developments, it’s worth noting that the broader Crypto markets are watching not only Bitcoin’s price but also how treasury programs adapt to regulatory expectations and evolving investor protections. For now, the sector’s fate hinges on disciplined capital deployment, clear governance, and a credible path to real value creation beyond mere price narratives.

Further coverage on related dynamics, including market reactions to the latest regulatory signals and new treasury deployments, will help investors gauge which players are likely to endure as the space consolidates.

Advertisement

Sources and data references include BitcoinTreasuries’ ongoing public-company BTC holdings ledger and market notes discussing the Nakamoto stock situation, including the SEC filing and Nasdaq delisting considerations. For context on BTC treasury metrics, see BitcoinTreasuries data.

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Coldcard MK5 ships with 5 major wallet upgrades

Published

on

Coldcard MK5 ships with 5 major wallet upgrades

Coinkite launched the Coldcard MK5, its first hardware upgrade to the flagship Bitcoin wallet since 2022.

Summary

  • The Coldcard MK5 features a 1.54-inch Gorilla Glass display, redesigned tactile buttons, and improved NFC for smoother Bitcoin transactions.
  • The wallet retains the MK4’s dual secure element architecture from two different chip vendors, keeping private keys fully air-gapped.
  • Coinkite’s NVK said the MK5 is a reimagining of the user experience while preserving the security standards the community has relied on for years.

Coinkite launched the Coldcard MK5 on March 10, 2026, marking the company’s first hardware revision to the MK line since the MK4 arrived in 2022 and introducing five significant user experience improvements to its Bitcoin-only signing device.

“The MK5 isn’t just an update; it’s a reimagining of the user experience,” said NVK, co-founder of Coinkite. “More durable, visible, and intuitive, all while preserving the rock-solid security our users depend on to protect their Bitcoin.”

Advertisement

What changed from MK4

The headline hardware change is a 1.54-inch display protected by Gorilla Glass, replacing the previous screen with one that is visibly sturdier and more legible. The MK4 used recessed buttons that required fingertips to press into a socket to register a click. The MK5 redesign brings buttons nearly flush with the chassis, giving clear tactile feedback without the awkward finger positioning of the previous model.

NFC capability has also been upgraded, improving the reliability of wireless signing workflows introduced in the Coldcard Q. The device retains the dual secure element design, pairing chips from two different manufacturers alongside a microcontroller, the same security architecture that set the MK4 apart when it launched. The MK5’s transparent case allows users to visually inspect the device’s internals for hardware implants, a feature Coinkite has emphasised as a physical security advantage over opaque designs.

All five upgrades are focused on usability rather than the security core. The MK5 continues to run the same open-source firmware that has been audited by the Bitcoin community for years and remains designed exclusively for Bitcoin, in line with Coinkite’s Bitcoin-only product philosophy.

Advertisement

The hardware wallet market has grown more competitive in 2026, with Trezor releasing the Safe 7 in late 2025 and several manufacturers adding touchscreens and wireless features. Coinkite’s deliberate choice to avoid touchscreens and prioritise physical button feedback signals a specific design philosophy: tactile clarity over interface modernity.

The Coldcard MK5 is available through Coinkite’s official store in multiple colours, including orange and a glow-in-the-dark variant. Pricing was not disclosed in the announcement but the device is positioned as a premium option for self-custody Bitcoin holders who prioritise air-gapped security.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Ripple (XRP) Price Bounces 2% on Continued ETF Inflows: What’s Next?

Published

on

Ripple’s XRP has recovered by around 2% over the past 24 hours, climbing back toward $1.34.

The move comes as institutional demand via spot XRP ETFs continues to stand in contrast to the broader market weakness.

XRP ETFs Extend Positive Inflow Streak

According to data from SoSoValue for today, spot XRP ETFs recorded $11.88 million in daily net inflows, bringing the cumulative total to $1.42 billion or $1.12 billion in net assets.

The figure represents 1.37% of the total XRP market cap.

Advertisement
Screenshot 2026-05-30 112044
Source: SoSoValue

That follows yesterday’s positive reading, when these products saw about $1.77 million in inflows despite the broader crypto market downturn.

The inflows may not be massive, but they do indicate a temporary trend, with institutions continuing to accumulate XRP amid market instability.

The continued streak gives bulls a positive narrative, but ETF demand alone has definitely not been enough to fully reverse the broader downtrend observed in XRP’s price.

XRP Price Outlook: Key Levels to Watch

From a technical perspective, XRP’s 2% daily bounce is encouraging, but it is far from being a signal for a confirmed trend reversal. The token has recently slipped toward its lowest level since March, with the $1.20 region continuing to serve as a key support level.

The first major upside level to watch is around $1.4.

Advertisement

As we recently reported, XRP’s 100-day moving average sits near that zone, making it a key resistance level for buyers to reclaim. A successful breakout above it could open the door to a move toward $1.5-$1.6 and improve short-term sentiment.

On the downside, a clean break below $1.20 would be a bearish signal, potentially exposing the altcoin to a deeper correction. This becomes especially true if Bitcoin and the broader crypto market resume their decline.

For now, however, XRP’s price outlook remains cautious.

The post Ripple (XRP) Price Bounces 2% on Continued ETF Inflows: What’s Next? appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Gravity Bridge Loses $5.4 Million in Suspected Signing Key Compromise

Published

on

Gravity Bridge Loses $5.4 Million in Suspected Signing Key Compromise

Attackers drained roughly $5.4 million from the Gravity Bridge Ethereum-side contract early on May 30. On-chain investigators point to a compromised signing key rather than a smart-contract flaw.

The exploit removed $4.3 million in USD Coin (USDC) and 274 ether (ETH) worth $553,000. PeckShield also recorded $434,000 in Tether (USDT) and PAYG tokens worth $64,000.

Inside the Gravity Bridge hack

The drain came from the bridge’s verified Ethereum contract, with privileged access enabling withdrawals that appeared authorized. On-chain analyst Specter flagged the incident first, listing two attacker addresses tied to the theft.

PeckShield said the hacker moved part of the proceeds through ChangeNow and Binance to obscure origins. Cyvers Alerts and other on-chain monitors confirmed the figures shortly after.

Advertisement

Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens

The attacker swapped most stablecoins into ETH and now controls about 2,102 ETH worth roughly $4.23 million.

Gravity Bridge connects Ethereum to the Cosmos ecosystem through IBC, letting assets such as USDC move between chains. The bridge held roughly $11.5 million in total value locked before the drain.

Advertisement

Past cross-chain bridge attacks like Ronin and Poly Network exposed how concentrated keys become a single point of failure.

PeckShield previously tallied eight major bridge exploits totaling $328.6 million in May alone.

Earlier incidents include the Meter bridge hack and a broader pattern of validator key failures across the sector.

Stablecoin issuers can blacklist addresses in minutes. Funds routed through non-custodial services like ChangeNow are harder to retrieve.

Advertisement

The remaining ETH stash is fully traceable on Etherscan but can still be split, mixed, or bridged to other chains.

The Gravity Bridge team has not issued a public response.

The post Gravity Bridge Loses $5.4 Million in Suspected Signing Key Compromise appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitcoin Treasury Space Still Has Fair Share of ‘Carnival Barkers’: BSTR Founder

Published

on

Bitcoin Treasury Space Still Has Fair Share of ‘Carnival Barkers’: BSTR Founder

The Bitcoin treasury company space is becoming more divided between firms with actual financial strategies and those leaning more on promotion, according to one industry executive.

“I think a lot of them don’t have the right capital structure, right. They don’t have the ability to actually deploy Bitcoin,” Sean Bill — co-founder of Bitcoin treasury company BSTR, alongside Adam Back  — said during an interview with Cointelegraph published to YouTube on Tuesday.

“They’re really planning on having Bitcoin do all the talking for them,” Bill said. “I do think that you have a lot of carnival barkers in this space,” Bill said.

Sean Bill spoke to Cointelegraph at BitcoinVegas. Source: Cointelegraph

Bill said that works well to an extent if a company has “cheap and easy access to leverage in the marketplace.” If not, companies must engage in other activities to add value beyond just holding Bitcoin, Bill explained. “Otherwise, investors will go to an ETF, you know, and just use a simple product like that, Bill said.

Advertisement

Bitcoin treasury companies have been one of the most talked-about narratives of the cycle, but questions have lingered over whether the sector is forming a bubble. While corporate Bitcoin treasuries have helped drive demand, they also introduce systemic risks. In a June 3, 2025, note to investors, Geoff Kendrick, head of digital assets at Standard Chartered Bank, said that a sharp price drop could trigger significant liquidations, while regulatory and market maturation may erode the premium for Bitcoin proxy stocks.

Related: Bitcoin plums new six-week lows as analyst eyes BTC price dip ‘end’ at $72K

There are 198 public companies collectively holding around 1.25 million Bitcoin, according to BitcoinTreasuries data. Michael Saylor’s Strategy is the largest public corporate holder, with a treasury of 843,738 Bitcoin.

On Wednesday, Cointelegraph reported that Bitcoin treasury company Nakamoto (NAKA) stock is down by about 67% year-to-date (YTD) and by more than 99% since its May 2025 peak of about $34 per share, reaching a low of about $0.16 per share in April before the reverse stock split on Friday.

Advertisement

Nasdaq warned the company in December that its shares would be delisted after trading below $1 for at least 30 consecutive days, according to a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filing.

Magazine: HYPE chases $100 target, ETH could dump below $1800: Market Moves

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Ethereum Foundation Returns to Spotlight Amid Governance and Culture Tensions

Published

on

Ethereum Foundation Returns to Spotlight Amid Governance and Culture Tensions

The Ethereum Foundation is facing its most concentrated wave of internal criticism in years, eight high-profile departures since January 2026, a contested public mandate, and an open debate over whether the Switzerland-based nonprofit still serves a coherent purpose inside the ecosystem it helped build. The conflict is no longer a background murmur.

It is now a front-page governance crisis for the network securing trillions of dollars in on-chain assets.

What makes this moment distinct is not the departures alone. It is the collision of competing visions for what the Ethereum Foundation is supposed to be, and, by extension, what Ethereum itself is supposed to become.

Advertisement

Ethereum Foundation: What’s Behind the Governance Conflict

The immediate flashpoint was the foundation’s March 13, 2026 “Mandate” publication, described internally as “part constitution, part manifesto, and part guide”, which explicitly reframed the EF as a steward rather than Ethereum’s “parent, ruler, or final authority.”

The document sharpened an old fault line: should the foundation stay narrowly focused on public-goods research, or evolve into a more execution-oriented institution capable of competing in an increasingly commercial blockchain landscape?

The departures accelerated criticism that had been building for months. Zak Cole, a longtime Ethereum contributor, delivered the sharpest public verdict on Laura Shin’s Unchained podcast: “The EF is completely out of touch.

Advertisement

They’re funding hippos in Asia and doing a bunch of stuff nobody in the world gives a s*** about other than Vitalik and his little cabal.” Cole framed the stakes plainly: “Ethereum is no longer a startup. It’s a mature and robust ecosystem. There’s billions, trillions of dollars on the line. Livelihoods are dependent on that.”

Former EF researcher Dankrad Feist went further, publicly floating the idea of a separate $1 billion ETH-aligned organization to improve execution and value capture, a direct challenge to the foundation’s public-goods model.

The foundation’s internal agenda has also been shifting: new protocol team leadership has been tasked with raising the gas limit to 200 million, advancing proposer-builder split work, and pushing mainnet-grade zkEVMs toward 128-bit provable security.

Vitalik Buterin pushed back last week in a lengthy post, arguing critics misread the EF’s intended role. “EF is not a ‘center of Ethereum,’” Buterin wrote. “Rather EF is ‘one node, with a defined purpose, alongside other nodes.’”

Advertisement

He framed the foundation’s current narrowing around its core values – censorship resistance, openness, privacy and security, internally labeled “CROPS”, as a deliberate strategic choice: “The EF is choosing to use its remaining resources to pursue longevity over breadth.”

Discover: The Best Crypto to Diversify Your Portfolio

Why Ethereum Foundation Governance Affects ETH Investors

The transmission mechanism from foundation-level conflict to market impact is indirect but real. Developer sentiment drives protocol credibility; protocol credibility drives institutional confidence; institutional confidence shapes ETH’s positioning as both a financial asset and an infrastructure bet.

Advertisement

ETH has already been under price pressure, and governance uncertainty adds a credibility drag that is difficult to quantify but easy to feel in ecosystem momentum.

Chris Buolos, president of Dromos Labs, the main developer firm behind decentralized exchange Aerodrome on Ethereum layer-2 network Base, acknowledged the valid criticism while defending the foundation’s residual value: “The substantive critique, that direction has been unclear and wasteful and that the app layer has been a secondary concern, is fair.

Source: ETHUSD / Tradingview

The EF has tried to be many things to many constituencies at once.” His defense of the EF centers on its neutrality: “Having a neutral party in the room when otherwise-competing teams need to align on best practices is worth more than it sometimes gets credit for.”

This is not a directly tradeable development in the way an ETF approval or enforcement action would be. But sustained governance uncertainty at the foundation level does matter for a network where coordination on upgrades, roadmap credibility, and developer retention are competitive advantages, particularly as rival L1s aggressively court Ethereum’s developer base.

Discover: The Best Token Presales

Advertisement

The post Ethereum Foundation Returns to Spotlight Amid Governance and Culture Tensions appeared first on Cryptonews.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Circle Freezes $12.6 Million in Confidential USDC, Exposing Surveillance Risks

Published

on

Circle blacklisted the Zama (privacy protocol) Confidential USDC (cUSDC) contract on Ethereum

Circle blacklisted Zama’s confidential USDC contract on Ethereum on May 30. The blacklist freezes roughly $12.6 million held in a cUSDC token contract.

The freeze prevents holders of confidential USDC (cUSDC) from redeeming the tokens for standard USDC. The action raises fresh questions about issuer control over privacy-focused Decentralized Finance (DeFi) protocols.

Circle Blacklist Halts cUSDC Redemptions

Circle, the issuer of USDC, maintains a built-in blacklist on the USDC smart contract. Authorized Circle accounts add addresses, and blacklisted addresses cannot send or receive the stablecoin.

The frozen contract is an ERC-1967 proxy that holds USDC on behalf of cUSDC token holders. Zama’s privacy protocol uses fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) to conceal balances and transfer amounts on public chains.

Advertisement
Circle blacklisted the Zama (privacy protocol) Confidential USDC (cUSDC) contract on Ethereum
Circle blacklisted the Zama (privacy protocol) Confidential USDC (cUSDC) contract on Ethereum. Source: USDTBanList

Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens

Circle has not publicly explained the decision.

Past freezes have followed sanctions orders, court directives, or suspected illicit activity. The company blacklisted Tornado Cash-linked USDC in 2022 after the U.S. Treasury sanctioned the mixer.

On-chain investigator ZachXBT traced the underlying funds to a wallet, which deposited 12.4 million USDC into Zama on May 11. The wallet appears to belong to Overnight Finance.

Overnight Finance recently held a Snapshot governance vote to distribute treasury funds after holders alleged the team was preparing to rug pull. The dispute may have triggered the freeze.

Regardless, it’s precedent-setting to unilaterally freeze the contracts or addresses of a protocol where funds have been commingled with Zama users.

The commingling means innocent cUSDC holders may be locked out alongside any targeted address.

Stablecoin Control Returns to Focus

The freeze exposes a recurring tension between privacy protocols and fiat-backed stablecoins. Circle retains unilateral power to freeze funds despite its decentralized infrastructure.

Advertisement

Critics have long warned that centralized issuers create chokepoints. The debate intensified this year after Circle floated reversible USDC plans that would allow transaction rollbacks under certain conditions.

Circle is exploring the feasibility of reversible USDC transactions.
Circle is exploring the feasibility of reversible USDC transactions.

Similar concerns surround Coinbase’s ability to blacklist staked Ethereum through its smart contracts.

Holders of cUSDC have no clear path to recover their funds while the freeze remains in place.

Zama and Circle have yet to issue public statements addressing the affected users.

Circle could reverse the action or provide justification, with the decision expected to shape how privacy projects evaluate building atop centrally issued stablecoins.

Advertisement

The post Circle Freezes $12.6 Million in Confidential USDC, Exposing Surveillance Risks appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitcoin bear market could last until 2027

Published

on

Bitcoin bear market could last until 2027

CryptoQuant CEO Ki Young Ju warns the Bitcoin bear market could extend into early 2027, based on on-chain PnL data.

Summary

  • Ki Young Ju cited CryptoQuant’s PnL Index Signal, which shows investor profitability typically falls for 18 months after profit-taking cascades begin.
  • The trend began in October 2025, placing a potential bear market bottom in early 2027 based on historical patterns.
  • A true reversal requires unrealized profits to rise while realized profits fall simultaneously, a signal that has not yet appeared.

CryptoQuant CEO Ki Young Ju posted on X this week warning that Bitcoin’s current downturn mirrors the extended bear cycles of 2014, 2018, and 2022, and may not resolve until early 2027.

“Once profit-taking cascades, Bitcoin investors’ PnL typically falls for about 18 months,” Ju wrote. “Since the trend change started in October 2025, the bear market could last until early 2027. The trend only changes when unrealized profits rise and realized profits fall. We’re not there yet.”

Advertisement

What the PnL Index shows

Ju’s analysis is grounded in CryptoQuant’s PnL Index Signal, a 365-day moving average that tracks investor profitability cycles. The indicator peaked in late 2025 in a pattern closely matching the tops recorded before the prolonged bear phases of 2014, 2018, and 2022. Each of those periods saw steep sustained declines once the signal rolled over from its peak.

Advertisement

Bitcoin was trading near $73,000 at the time of the post, down roughly 30% from its 2025 highs, amid rising macroeconomic pressure from elevated US Treasury yields and broader risk-off sentiment across markets. As crypto.news reported, bearish social commentary on Bitcoin hit its highest level in 2026 earlier in April as spot demand weakened.

The reversal signal Ju describes requires a specific combination that has not yet materialised: unrealized profit margins must begin rising while realised profits fall simultaneously, indicating that selling pressure is exhausting itself and buyers are regaining control. Until that pattern appears, Ju views the bear case as intact.

Not all analysts share the extended timeline. VanEck CEO Jan van Eck told CNBC earlier this year that Bitcoin may be forming a cycle bottom, pointing to options market stabilisation and slowing long-term holder selling as early constructive signs. Coinbase noted in its April 2026 monthly report that price support may emerge between May and June, potentially setting up a stronger third quarter.

Advertisement

How Bitcoin recovers from this level

For a sustained recovery, Ju flagged two critical demand drivers: renewed inflows from spot Bitcoin ETFs and increased activity from over-the-counter institutional desks, both of which have slowed in recent months. ETF flows have remained positive but at a normalised pace relative to the surge seen in early 2025.

On-chain data from CryptoQuant shows that capital inflows into Bitcoin continue to rise, but market capitalisation has not responded proportionally. That divergence, where money enters the market but prices stagnate or decline, is the defining signature of a bear market in Ju’s framework.

Bitcoin’s current price is consolidating near the $73,000 level, with CoinGlass identifying $74,200 and $74,500 as key resistance zones where large sell orders are clustered. The Clarity Act’s potential passage remains one of the most cited institutional catalysts that analysts believe could shift sentiment, though Ju’s PnL model operates independently of policy timelines.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

US Seizes Nearly $1 Billion in Iranian Crypto Assets, Treasury Secretary Says

Published

on

US Seizes Nearly $1 Billion in Iranian Crypto Assets, Treasury Secretary Says

The United States has seized roughly $1 billion in Iranian crypto assets, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Friday, adding that some of the wallet owners may not yet know the funds are gone.

“I believe that we have seized about a billion dollars of their crypto,” Bessent said while speaking at the Reagan National Economic Forum. “Just outright grabbed the wallets. Some of them may be typing in right now and not have realized that their wallet had been grabbed,” he added.

Bessent said the seizures are part of the US financial pressure campaign against Iran, known as Operation Economic Fury. Launched in March 2025, the operation has targeted Iranian assets across multiple fronts, seizing cryptocurrency, freezing bank accounts and working with European allies to confiscate properties.

Scott Bessent at the Reagan National Economic Forum. Source: YouTube

“I think between five and a half to six weeks of an incredibly successful military campaign and Operation Economic Fury, where we have really cut them off. They are at the end of their Tether now financially,” he said.

Advertisement

Related: Crypto markets shed $80B after fresh US strikes on Iran

Iran’s financial state is dire

The Treasury secretary said the regime had been siphoning $400 to $500 million a month and dividing the proceeds among roughly 80 leaders before the US intervened. He said inflation in Iran has likely surpassed 200%, food vouchers are being distributed, the internet has been shut down and 40 to 50% of Iranian troops are not getting paid.

Bessent also addressed ongoing negotiations with Iran, noting the complexity of dealing with a fractured leadership structure following US and Israeli strikes on senior regime figures.

The newly disclosed $1 billion figure is roughly double the $500 million in Iranian cryptocurrency assets the Treasury Department announced it had seized in late April, and much higher than the $344 million in seized crypto assets disclosed earlier in the month.

Advertisement

Related: Bitcoin bounces as Trump prepares to announce ‘negotiated’ Iran deal

Iran eyes Bitcoin-powered insurance scheme for Hormuz

As Cointelegraph reported, Iran is weighing a plan to monetize control of the Strait of Hormuz through a Bitcoin-based insurance model. A state document cited by Fars News Agency, an outlet closely affiliated with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, outlined a platform called “Hormuz Safe,” which would sell digital marine insurance paid in Bitcoin and settled on the blockchain, potentially generating over $10 billion in revenue for the country.

In early April, a spokesperson for Iran’s Oil, Gas and Petrochemical Products Exporters’ Union said certain ships would be able to pass through the strait provided that they pay a tariff of $1 per barrel of oil in Bitcoin.

Magazine: Guide to the top and emerging global crypto hubs — Mid-2026

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Binance adds GENIUS as 65th HODLer airdrop

Published

on

Binance adds GENIUS as 65th HODLer airdrop

Binance named Genius Terminal its 65th HODLer Airdrop, giving 10 million GENIUS tokens to qualifying BNB holders.

Summary

  • Binance will distribute 10 million GENIUS tokens to BNB holders who used Simple Earn or On-Chain Yields between May 11 and 13, 2026.
  • Genius Terminal is a multichain trading platform backed by YZi Labs and advised by CZ, with a 1 billion token total supply.
  • The HODLer Airdrop program is a recurring Binance mechanism that deepens BNB utility by rewarding long-term stakers retroactively.

Binance announced Genius Terminal as the 65th project on its HODLer Airdrop program, continuing its pattern of rewarding loyal BNB holders with tokens from projects ahead of their exchange listing.

The snapshot window for eligibility ran from May 11 to May 13, 2026. Only BNB subscribed to Binance’s Simple Earn or On-Chain Yields products during that three-day period qualifies, with allocations distributed proportionally based on each user’s BNB balance. Rewards were sent to eligible users’ Spot Accounts within five hours of the announcement.

Advertisement

What is Genius Terminal

Genius Terminal is a multichain trading platform that connects to perpetual decentralised exchanges, offering spot and perpetual trading with zero fees for select pairs. YZi Labs, formerly Binance Labs, made an eight-figure investment in the project in January 2026, and CZ joined as a strategic advisor. The announcement triggered a spike in platform trading volume from roughly $80 million per week to more than $2 billion in the following seven days.

The GENIUS token has a total supply of 1 billion and launched its token generation event in April 2026. The HODLer Airdrop distribution covers 10 million tokens, equal to 1% of maximum supply, adding new circulating tokens alongside the exchange listing.

As crypto.news reported, HODLer Airdrop listings have historically triggered sharp price moves in the airdropped token as recipients decide whether to hold or sell into the initial trading session. SAPIEN surged more than 100% in the 24 hours after being featured as the 57th HODLer Airdrop project.

Advertisement

For Binance, the program serves a dual purpose: it incentivises long-term BNB staking and provides visibility for projects building on BNB Smart Chain ahead of their listings. Genius Terminal’s selection follows the 64th HODLer Airdrop featuring Gensyn, a decentralised AI compute network, suggesting that AI-linked infrastructure projects have become a recurring theme in Binance’s curation decisions for the program.

The exchange has not disclosed whether a full spot listing for GENIUS will follow the HODLer distribution, though previous projects in the program have typically proceeded to spot trading within 24 hours of the airdrop announcement.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025