Spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have logged outflows for ten consecutive trading days, with total net redemptions exceeding $2.97 billion since May 15, a streak that one analyst says may signal a market bottom is near.

According to data from SoSoValue, daily outflows ranged from $70 million to $733 million across the period, with the steepest single-day exodus recorded on Wednesday at $733.43 million. Total net assets held across spot Bitcoin (BTC) ETFs have dropped from $104.29 billion on May 15 to $94.17 billion as of Friday, a decline of roughly $10 billion in two weeks.

The current streak broke the previous record of eight consecutive outflow sessions, which was recorded in early last year and saw $3.2 billion in withdrawals, on Thursday, before extending to 10 days on Friday.

Spot Bitcoin ETFs have become a major gauge of institutional demand since their US launch. Large inflows have historically signaled growing optimism and increased demand, while heavy outflows reflect fear and de-risking.

Related: Bitcoin ETFs Turn Negative as IBIT Posts Near-Record Losses

Bitcoin ETF outflows signal ‘peak fear’

Crypto analytics firm Santiment Intelligence said the sustained outflows may suggest the market bottom is nearing an end. “History has shown that extreme ETF outflows typically work well as a contrarian indicator, since prices move opposite to trader expectations,” Santiment wrote on X.

In a Friday post on X, the platform argued that when large amounts of money leave Bitcoin ETFs over a short period, it reflects ‘peak fear, frustration, or risk aversion’ among investors.

Source: Santiment Intelligence

The firm pointed to the nearly $904 million single-day outflow recorded in November 2025, which occurred close to a major market low before prices recovered. “Consider the massive level of money moving out as a sign that we are getting closer to the local bottom some patient investors have been waiting for,” it added.

Related: Bitcoin ETFs on Brink of Net Outflow Territory For 2026

Spot Ether ETFs see 14-day outflow streak

Spot Ether (ETH) ETFs have also been caught in the broader selloff, logging outflows across 14 consecutive trading sessions from May 11 to Friday. Daily redemptions ranged from $5.65 million to $130.62 million, with the steepest single-day exit recorded on May 12 at $130.62 million. Total net assets fell from $13.85 billion on May 11 to $11.27 billion on May 29, a decline of roughly $2.6 billion over the period.

Meanwhile, spot Hyperliquid (HYPE) ETFs bucked the trend, logging inflows every single session since launching on May 12. Cumulative net inflows crossed $100 million by May 28, with total net assets climbing from $1.87 million at launch to $122.20 million in just over two weeks.

Magazine: Guide to the top and emerging global crypto hubs — Mid-2026

Brian Armstrong fired back at Jamie Dimon on Friday with a meme, after the JPMorgan CEO attacked him on live TV.

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong posted a hockey-themed rivalry meme on X on Friday, hours after JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon appeared on Fox Business’s Mornings with Maria and called Armstrong “full of sh!t” over his lobbying push for the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act.

The exchange escalated a months-long public feud between Wall Street’s largest bank chief and crypto’s most prominent exchange CEO, now centred on a single sticking point: whether crypto platforms should be allowed to pay yield on stablecoin balances without submitting to bank-style regulation.

The rapidly evolving Bitcoin treasury space finds itself at a crossroads, split between funds with deployable capital strategies and a wave of promotional narratives. In a candid interview at BitcoinVegas, Sean Bill, co-founder of the Bitcoin treasury vehicle BSTR alongside Adam Back, warned that many peers may be overpromising and underdelivering on practical deployment of Bitcoin.

“A lot of them don’t have the right capital structure to actually deploy Bitcoin,” Bill told Cointelegraph in a YouTube interview published this week. “They’re really planning on having Bitcoin do all the talking for them. I do think that you have a lot of carnival barkers in this space.”

Bill argued that the value proposition for a treasury-focused firm hinges on more than simply holding Bitcoin. While cheap and easy leverage can prop up value, a company without a credible mechanism to deploy capital risks losing investor interest to simpler products—such as Bitcoin exchange-traded products—when price makes the narrative harder to justify after the initial hype fades.

The ongoing debate surrounding Bitcoin treasuries has become one of the cycle’s most-discussed narratives. While corporate holdings have driven demand and visibility for Bitcoin, they also raise questions about systemic risk and market integrity as the sector matures.

In a June 3, 2025 note to investors, Geoff Kendrick, head of digital assets at Standard Chartered Bank, warned that a sharp drop in Bitcoin’s price could trigger sizable liquidations within treasury-linked strategies. He also noted that regulatory developments and broader market maturation may erode the premium that has historically accompanied Bitcoin proxy stocks. The takeaway for market participants is clear: a shift from speculative hype to disciplined capital deployment could redefine how these vehicles are valued in the years ahead.

Bitcoin treasury data underscores the sector’s scale and concentration. According to BitcoinTreasuries, 198 public companies collectively hold about 1.25 million BTC. Among them, Michael Saylor’s Strategy is listed as the largest public corporate holder, with a treasury of 843,738 BTC.

Recent coverage has highlighted the fragility of some listed vehicles. Cointelegraph reported that Nakamoto (NAKA) stock, a prominent Bitcoin treasury-listed company, slid roughly 67% year-to-date and more than 99% from its May 2025 peak of around $34 per share. The stock traded near $0.16 in April before a reverse stock split, a move that drew attention from investors and market observers. Nasdaq had warned of possible delisting after trading below $1 for 30 consecutive days, according to an SEC filing.

These dynamics illuminate the tension between narrative-driven momentum and the realities of capital markets. As more capital programs come online, the sector’s ability to deploy capital prudently—and to withstand downside risk—will increasingly determine which players survive the next cycle.

For readers tracking this space, the broader question remains: will the Bitcoin treasury model evolve into a disciplined, capital-allocating ecosystem that stands on its own merits, or will it rely on continued price momentum and promotional narratives to attract capital?

Key takeaways

• The Bitcoin treasury sector is bifurcating between firms with credible capital deployment strategies and those leaning on promotional narratives without robust capital structures.
• Without real deployment options, some companies risk losing investor interest to straightforward Bitcoin products like ETFs, especially in softer macro conditions.
• Analysts warn that a sharp price decline could trigger forced liquidations in treasury strategies, while regulatory and market maturation may erode premium pricing for Bitcoin proxy stocks.
• BitcoinTreasuries tallies show 198 public companies holding about 1.25 million BTC; the largest holder is described as Michael Saylor’s Strategy with 843,738 BTC.
• Illustrative cases like Nakamoto (NAKA) illustrate liquidity and delisting risks in this niche, underscoring the need for robust corporate governance and sustainable capital plans.

A split in the Bitcoin treasury landscape

Sean Bill’s critique centers on the structural viability of treasury programs. He contends that a credible firm must demonstrate an actionable plan to deploy Bitcoin into productive use—whether through yield-generating mechanisms, strategic hedging, or disciplined capitalization—rather than relying on Bitcoin’s price appreciation alone to justify value. In his view, “carnival barkers” may generate short-term buzz but fail to deliver durable value for long-term investors.

The industry’s narrative is closely tied to Bitcoin’s own price journey and the broader appetite for crypto exposure via listed vehicles. As Treasury strategies proliferate, the question becomes whether the market will reward tangible capital deployment and governance rigor or reward spectacle and marketing hype. This debate matters for investors seeking diversification within crypto and for builders crafting transparent, risk-aware treasury programs.

Regulatory and market maturation: what changes the calculus?

Market observers point to the Standard Chartered assessment as a reminder that the space cannot remain purely narrative-driven. A potential price shock could trigger liquidity events that ripple through treasury portfolios, particularly when leverage and margin facilities are employed. At the same time, regulatory clarity and market maturation could compress the premium that investors have historically paid for Bitcoin proxy exposure, pushing capital toward products and protocols that demonstrate resilience beyond hype.

The evolving regulatory backdrop is thus as important as Bitcoin’s price action for treasury strategies. As this segment matures, investors will demand greater transparency on reserve management, risk controls, and the ability to deploy capital productively under varied market conditions.

Scale, concentration, and the Nakamoto case

The BitcoinTreasuries dataset paints a picture of scale and concentration. With nearly 1.25 million BTC across 198 public companies, the sector remains dominated by a few large holders. The largest, described in industry data as Michael Saylor’s Strategy, holds 843,738 BTC, underscoring how a small number of large treasury positions can shape market perception and capital flows.

The Nakamoto case provides a cautionary counterpoint. The stock’s steep decline and the delisting risk highlighted the fragility that can accompany publicly traded Bitcoin treasury vehicles. The intersection of stock market mechanics and crypto exposure remains a delicate space where governance, liquidity, and valuation interact in complex ways.

As readers monitor these developments, it’s worth noting that the broader Crypto markets are watching not only Bitcoin’s price but also how treasury programs adapt to regulatory expectations and evolving investor protections. For now, the sector’s fate hinges on disciplined capital deployment, clear governance, and a credible path to real value creation beyond mere price narratives.

Further coverage on related dynamics, including market reactions to the latest regulatory signals and new treasury deployments, will help investors gauge which players are likely to endure as the space consolidates.

Sources and data references include BitcoinTreasuries’ ongoing public-company BTC holdings ledger and market notes discussing the Nakamoto stock situation, including the SEC filing and Nasdaq delisting considerations. For context on BTC treasury metrics, see BitcoinTreasuries data.

Coinkite launched the Coldcard MK5, its first hardware upgrade to the flagship Bitcoin wallet since 2022.

Coinkite launched the Coldcard MK5 on March 10, 2026, marking the company’s first hardware revision to the MK line since the MK4 arrived in 2022 and introducing five significant user experience improvements to its Bitcoin-only signing device.

“The MK5 isn’t just an update; it’s a reimagining of the user experience,” said NVK, co-founder of Coinkite. “More durable, visible, and intuitive, all while preserving the rock-solid security our users depend on to protect their Bitcoin.”

What changed from MK4

The headline hardware change is a 1.54-inch display protected by Gorilla Glass, replacing the previous screen with one that is visibly sturdier and more legible. The MK4 used recessed buttons that required fingertips to press into a socket to register a click. The MK5 redesign brings buttons nearly flush with the chassis, giving clear tactile feedback without the awkward finger positioning of the previous model.

NFC capability has also been upgraded, improving the reliability of wireless signing workflows introduced in the Coldcard Q. The device retains the dual secure element design, pairing chips from two different manufacturers alongside a microcontroller, the same security architecture that set the MK4 apart when it launched. The MK5’s transparent case allows users to visually inspect the device’s internals for hardware implants, a feature Coinkite has emphasised as a physical security advantage over opaque designs.

All five upgrades are focused on usability rather than the security core. The MK5 continues to run the same open-source firmware that has been audited by the Bitcoin community for years and remains designed exclusively for Bitcoin, in line with Coinkite’s Bitcoin-only product philosophy.

The hardware wallet market has grown more competitive in 2026, with Trezor releasing the Safe 7 in late 2025 and several manufacturers adding touchscreens and wireless features. Coinkite’s deliberate choice to avoid touchscreens and prioritise physical button feedback signals a specific design philosophy: tactile clarity over interface modernity.

The Coldcard MK5 is available through Coinkite’s official store in multiple colours, including orange and a glow-in-the-dark variant. Pricing was not disclosed in the announcement but the device is positioned as a premium option for self-custody Bitcoin holders who prioritise air-gapped security.

The Bitcoin treasury company space is becoming more divided between firms with actual financial strategies and those leaning more on promotion, according to one industry executive.

“I think a lot of them don’t have the right capital structure, right. They don’t have the ability to actually deploy Bitcoin,” Sean Bill — co-founder of Bitcoin treasury company BSTR, alongside Adam Back  — said during an interview with Cointelegraph published to YouTube on Tuesday.

“They’re really planning on having Bitcoin do all the talking for them,” Bill said. “I do think that you have a lot of carnival barkers in this space,” Bill said.

Sean Bill spoke to Cointelegraph at BitcoinVegas. Source: Cointelegraph

Bill said that works well to an extent if a company has “cheap and easy access to leverage in the marketplace.” If not, companies must engage in other activities to add value beyond just holding Bitcoin, Bill explained. “Otherwise, investors will go to an ETF, you know, and just use a simple product like that, Bill said.

Bitcoin treasury companies have been one of the most talked-about narratives of the cycle, but questions have lingered over whether the sector is forming a bubble. While corporate Bitcoin treasuries have helped drive demand, they also introduce systemic risks. In a June 3, 2025, note to investors, Geoff Kendrick, head of digital assets at Standard Chartered Bank, said that a sharp price drop could trigger significant liquidations, while regulatory and market maturation may erode the premium for Bitcoin proxy stocks.

Related: Bitcoin plums new six-week lows as analyst eyes BTC price dip ‘end’ at $72K

There are 198 public companies collectively holding around 1.25 million Bitcoin, according to BitcoinTreasuries data. Michael Saylor’s Strategy is the largest public corporate holder, with a treasury of 843,738 Bitcoin.

On Wednesday, Cointelegraph reported that Bitcoin treasury company Nakamoto (NAKA) stock is down by about 67% year-to-date (YTD) and by more than 99% since its May 2025 peak of about $34 per share, reaching a low of about $0.16 per share in April before the reverse stock split on Friday.

Nasdaq warned the company in December that its shares would be delisted after trading below $1 for at least 30 consecutive days, according to a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filing.

Magazine: HYPE chases $100 target, ETH could dump below $1800: Market Moves

CryptoQuant CEO Ki Young Ju warns the Bitcoin bear market could extend into early 2027, based on on-chain PnL data.

CryptoQuant CEO Ki Young Ju posted on X this week warning that Bitcoin’s current downturn mirrors the extended bear cycles of 2014, 2018, and 2022, and may not resolve until early 2027.

“Once profit-taking cascades, Bitcoin investors’ PnL typically falls for about 18 months,” Ju wrote. “Since the trend change started in October 2025, the bear market could last until early 2027. The trend only changes when unrealized profits rise and realized profits fall. We’re not there yet.”

What the PnL Index shows

Ju’s analysis is grounded in CryptoQuant’s PnL Index Signal, a 365-day moving average that tracks investor profitability cycles. The indicator peaked in late 2025 in a pattern closely matching the tops recorded before the prolonged bear phases of 2014, 2018, and 2022. Each of those periods saw steep sustained declines once the signal rolled over from its peak.

Bitcoin was trading near $73,000 at the time of the post, down roughly 30% from its 2025 highs, amid rising macroeconomic pressure from elevated US Treasury yields and broader risk-off sentiment across markets. As crypto.news reported, bearish social commentary on Bitcoin hit its highest level in 2026 earlier in April as spot demand weakened.

The reversal signal Ju describes requires a specific combination that has not yet materialised: unrealized profit margins must begin rising while realised profits fall simultaneously, indicating that selling pressure is exhausting itself and buyers are regaining control. Until that pattern appears, Ju views the bear case as intact.

Not all analysts share the extended timeline. VanEck CEO Jan van Eck told CNBC earlier this year that Bitcoin may be forming a cycle bottom, pointing to options market stabilisation and slowing long-term holder selling as early constructive signs. Coinbase noted in its April 2026 monthly report that price support may emerge between May and June, potentially setting up a stronger third quarter.

How Bitcoin recovers from this level

For a sustained recovery, Ju flagged two critical demand drivers: renewed inflows from spot Bitcoin ETFs and increased activity from over-the-counter institutional desks, both of which have slowed in recent months. ETF flows have remained positive but at a normalised pace relative to the surge seen in early 2025.

On-chain data from CryptoQuant shows that capital inflows into Bitcoin continue to rise, but market capitalisation has not responded proportionally. That divergence, where money enters the market but prices stagnate or decline, is the defining signature of a bear market in Ju’s framework.

Bitcoin’s current price is consolidating near the $73,000 level, with CoinGlass identifying $74,200 and $74,500 as key resistance zones where large sell orders are clustered. The Clarity Act’s potential passage remains one of the most cited institutional catalysts that analysts believe could shift sentiment, though Ju’s PnL model operates independently of policy timelines.