Connect with us

Crypto World

RedStone brings instant exits to NYLIM tokenized fund

Published

on

RedStone brings instant exits to NYLIM tokenized fund

RedStone has announced plans to give holders of Centrifuge’s tokenized NYLIM U.S. high-yield bond fund same-block exits through offchain auctions lasting about 300 milliseconds.

Summary

  • RedStone Settle will provide same-block exits for HYB, whose standard redemption period is T+3.
  • KYC-approved liquidity providers will bid on the discount required to purchase fund units immediately.
  • Atomic transactions and bonded solver deposits are designed to limit failed settlement and front-running.
  • RedStone said prefunded vaults will supply backstop liquidity when direct participation is insufficient.

RedStone said in a Sept. 1 announcement shared with crypto.news that its Settle service is being integrated with the NYLIM Anemoy U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Segregated Portfolio, known by the ticker HYB.

Issued through Centrifuge, HYB is the first tokenized fund sub-advised by New York Life Investment Management. NYLIM manages $838 billion in assets, according to the latest figure provided by RedStone, up from the roughly $807 billion reported when the fund was introduced in June.

Advertisement

The integration is designed to let HYB holders, lending protocols, and liquidators sell fund units within one blockchain transaction. A liquidity provider supplies the immediate capital, takes possession of the units, and later completes the fund’s regular redemption process.

Although RedStone describes the service as T+0 settlement, HYB’s underlying redemption period remains T+3. Settle instead transfers the waiting period to an approved liquidity provider willing to hold the units in return for a discount.

RedStone Settle uses a 300-millisecond auction

When RedStone identifies a position eligible for liquidation, the system runs an offchain auction lasting approximately 300 milliseconds, RedStone co-founder and COO Marcin Kazmierczak told crypto.news.

Advertisement

KYC-verified and whitelisted liquidity providers, called solvers, bid according to the discount they require from the HYB reference price. The bid closest to a 0% discount wins, meaning the seller receives the price nearest to the fund unit’s calculated value.

Once the auction ends, RedStone combines its latest price update and the liquidation instruction in one atomic onchain transaction. Kazmierczak said the structure prevents front-running because the price submission and execution happen together rather than through separate transactions.

Atomic execution also means every part of the transaction must succeed, or the entire operation reverts. According to Kazmierczak, the winning solver has a bonded deposit that can be slashed if it fails to supply the promised capital.

The solver then redeems the acquired HYB units through the issuer’s standard T+3 process and keeps the auction discount as compensation for providing immediate liquidity and accepting the redemption delay.

Advertisement

No large onchain liquidity pool is required under RedStone’s model. The company said Centrifuge and NYLIM also do not need to supply capital for early exits or change the fund’s existing redemption operations.

“Tokenization solved issuance. It did not solve settlement — and settlement is what defines whether an asset scales onchain with broader utility,” Kazmierczak said.

According to the executive, lending market curators need confidence that liquidators can dispose of collateral when a loan becomes undercollateralized. A known exit price and settlement time could allow curators to calculate lending limits without relying on an uncertain redemption queue, he added.

HYB auctions start from administrator-derived NAV

Because high-yield corporate bonds do not trade continuously like cryptocurrencies, the HYB auction will not begin with a price taken from a round-the-clock spot market.

Kazmierczak said RedStone’s fundamental price feed will determine the starting value using net asset value data derived from the fund administrator. Solvers then compete by submitting the percentage discount they require to acquire and redeem the units.

Advertisement

The pricing method places the fund administrator’s NAV at the center of the auction, while solver bids account for the cost and risk of waiting through the redemption period. RedStone said the structure can also process voluntary redemptions and deleveraging transactions, rather than operating only when a loan enters liquidation.

In a stressed market, however, the auction still requires enough capital from eligible solvers. Asked what would happen if too few providers participated or no suitable bid appeared, Kazmierczak said prefunded vaults would also join auctions and were intended to keep backstop liquidity available onchain.

Continuous and defensible pricing has remained a separate obstacle for tokenized assets used in lending. An August report on Stellar’s DeFi gap found that its RWA market had exceeded $3 billion, while pools on Blend that could accept RWAs held only slightly more than $2 million.

RedStone said in that report that tokenized corporate debt requires pricing systems to account for credit quality, maturity, settlement terms, and security structure. Fund administrator data is especially important when the underlying portfolio lacks continuous public trading.

Advertisement

NYLIM’s HYB fund moves from issuance to collateral

Centrifuge and NYLIM introduced the HYB fund in June, giving eligible investors onchain access to NYLIM’s U.S. high-yield corporate bond strategy.

Under the original structure, subscriptions and redemptions settle in USDC, while NYLIM retains responsibility for the portfolio, investment process, and risk management. Centrifuge supplies the tokenization and fund infrastructure rather than managing the underlying bonds.

RedStone said HYB units will be made available as collateral in markets built on Morpho, a decentralized lending protocol with isolated pools. Each Morpho market can set separate collateral assets, loan-to-value limits, and liquidation parameters, keeping the conditions attached to HYB apart from unrelated lending pools.

The integration could allow an eligible holder to borrow against HYB rather than sell the position, subject to the rules and liquidity of the relevant Morpho market. RedStone said curators could use the auction’s settlement terms when deciding how much credit to extend against each unit.

Advertisement

In May, Morpho’s lending infrastructure expanded to Tempo, where Gauntlet and Sentora introduced curated markets, and RedStone supplied price feeds for stablecoins and tokenized real-world assets. The HYB integration applies the three services—pricing, market curation and lending—to a tokenized U.S. corporate bond portfolio.

Access will remain permissioned because HYB transfers require approved participants. Kazmierczak said other tokenized funds could use Settle if they support KYC or business-verification whitelists, connect to a reliable NAV feed, and maintain clear redemption terms that let solvers price the waiting period.

Tokenized credit gains another high-yield product

HYB is entering a tokenized credit market that now includes high-yield strategies from several established U.S. investment managers.

In August, Securitize launched a separate fund managed with Neuberger Berman that invests mainly in high-yield bonds. RedStone said it supplies pricing infrastructure for that strategy as well.

Advertisement

RWA.xyz data cited in RedStone’s announcement placed tokenized real-world assets above $38 billion in August, compared with about $5.4 billion in early 2025. The same data put tokenized U.S. government debt at $16.2 billion and tokenized credit at $7.3 billion.

RedStone said more than 1.7 million addresses held tokenized real-world assets during August, following a 56% monthly increase. Wallet or blockchain addresses, however, do not necessarily correspond to the same number of individual investors.

Citi has projected that tokenized assets could reach $5.5 trillion by 2030, while Standard Chartered has estimated a $2 trillion market by 2028. Both figures remain institutional projections rather than measured commitments or completed token issuances.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Important Pi Network News and PI Price Update: September 1

Published

on

The controversial cryptocurrency project has stood aside from the spotlight lately as the community awaits a major protocol update scheduled for mid-September.

Meanwhile, social media buzz claimed that Elon Musk publicly endorsed PI, yet the token’s price failed to capitalize on the speculation and hardly participated in the broader crypto rebound seen over the past two weeks.

All Eyes on This Date

Pi Network began the long process of protocol upgrades at the start of 2026 when the Core Team unveiled version 19.6. Among the next ones was v20.2, which laid the foundations for smart contract capabilities.

Some of the following updates became harder to deploy, resulting in delays. Version 25, for instance, was supposed to be introduced by July 22, yet it came later than expected. The implementation of protocol v26 also surpassed its initial deadline.

Advertisement

The next one, which is actually scheduled to be the last, is v27, and it should be deployed by September 15. It will add more flexible and secure smart-contract authentication, giving accounts and apps better ways to authorize transactions. Version 27 will continue the progress by introducing newer protocol features and expanding the network’s smart contract capabilities.

Musk’s Interaction?

Just a few days ago, the world’s wealthiest person dropped an X post where he insisted that the universe “is integer in units of Planck cubes.” The assumption triggered multiple comments from users and experts who used mathematical terms in their theories. One of them, named Pierre Ferragu, claimed that π “doesn’t exist but the idea of π does.” Musk did not stay silent about that assumption, saying:

“Pi can be (and has been) used in integer form for calculating interplanetary trajectories. The relevant maximum number of digits of pi is how many are needed to describe the volume of the Universe in Planck cubes (voxels).”

At first glance, this appeared like a brainstorm about the universe and its complex nature, but it seems the debate intrigued Pioneers. The popular X account BSCN claimed that Musk’s interaction sparked a discussion in the Pi Network ecosystem.

“What started as a casual reply to a user’s comment has sparked a huge frenzy within the Pi Network ecosystem. Yesterday, billionaire CEO Elon Musk replied to a user, highlighting Pi’s physically meaningful representation. However, the reply has been seen as some form of endorsement for Pioneers,” it explained.

Speculation and Nothing More?

It is important to note that there was no further interaction from Musk and no clarification that he was referring to Pi Network’s native token. In fact, the coin has barely seen any volatility over the past few days and continues to trade below $0.10.

Advertisement

It is up approximately 7% over the past two weeks, but that is rather disappointing given the overall market boom during this period, where Bitcoin (BTC) soared by 22%, and Ethereum (ETH) spiked by 30%.

Still, some analysts believe PI may experience a more substantial short-term surge. X user Crypto With Gopal argued that the price is squeezing around the $0.09 zone as volatility contracts, opining that a breakout above could set the stage for a pump toward $0.15.

The post Important Pi Network News and PI Price Update: September 1 appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Crypto-backed PAC cuts Massachusetts primary ad spend by $189K

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

A Fairshake-linked political committee is spending on media support for incumbent U.S. Representative Jake Auchincloss ahead of Tuesday’s Massachusetts primary, according to Federal Election Commission (FEC) records. The activity comes as crypto-focused political spending groups continue to expand their influence beyond narrowly defined policy debates.

FEC filings show Protect Progress PAC—a Fairshake affiliate—spent just over $189,000 on media to back Auchincloss’s reelection campaign in Massachusetts’ 4th congressional district. Democratic challenger Jason Poulos, in a letter made public on Aug. 16, accused the incumbent of being influenced by the crypto industry and criticized the PAC’s efforts as potentially improper election interference.

Key takeaways

  • FEC records indicate Protect Progress PAC spent just over $189,000 on media in support of Jake Auchincloss ahead of Tuesday’s Massachusetts primary.
  • PAC spending is not tied to policy position votes in the reporting; Poulos argues the media activity is meant to influence voter perceptions during the primary.
  • Poulos alleges Auchincloss accepted $77,500 from “crypto-industry sources” since 2020 and links that to crypto legislation votes.
  • Fairshake’s broader election push continues into 2026, with the group citing large cash reserves and multiple prior race efforts earlier in the cycle.

Protect Progress PAC spending in Massachusetts

The FEC data, as of Tuesday, points to Protect Progress PAC’s media spend targeting Auchincloss in the Massachusetts 4th district primary. While the filings confirm the existence and scale of the spending, the underlying communications content is disputed politically, with the campaign message becoming part of Poulos’s attack on the incumbent.

According to Poulos, some of the PAC’s resources were used to produce what he described as “AI-generated slop mailers” supporting Auchincloss ahead of the Massachusetts primary, which took place Tuesday.

Poulos presses Auchincloss to renounce the PAC’s efforts

In the Aug. 16 letter, Poulos urged the incumbent to “publicly renounce” Protect Progress PAC’s involvement, framing the PAC’s activity as a way to influence both the primary and the eventual general election.

Advertisement

Poulos also raised campaign-finance and legislative-history allegations. He claimed Auchincloss accepted $77,500 directly from “crypto-industry sources” since 2020. He further pointed to Auchincloss’s voting record on the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act in July 2025—described in the article as a market-structure bill that has not yet been signed into law and is pending consideration in the Senate.

The core of Poulos’s argument appears to be that Auchincloss’s legislative behavior aligns with donors and industry pressure, and that the PAC’s media campaign—especially if it relies on AI-generated materials—underscores the influence he believes is operating behind the scenes.

Fairshake and affiliates keep targeting 2026 elections

This Massachusetts spending is part of a broader pattern of political activity from Fairshake and its affiliates. The reporting notes that Fairshake’s election efforts have included significant ad and media spending in the 2024 cycle—over $130 million—and that its affiliated PACs are continuing to pursue race-by-race influence during the 2026 midterm election period.

Earlier in August, Fairshake reported spending roughly $3.6 million on House and Senate races across Alaska, Florida, and Wyoming, as described in coverage linked within the article. The same reporting states that Fairshake had $122 million in cash on hand ahead of the 2026 midterms.

Advertisement

In an August statement quoted in the article, a Fairshake spokesperson, Geoff Vetter, said the organization would not slow down heading into November—connecting the group’s persistence to its cash reserves and the number of prior race wins.

What this means for voters and upcoming primaries

Massachusetts’ primary timing makes it one of the final major state nomination contests before the general election, with the general election still ahead and only a little over two months remaining, as cited in the article. The reporting also notes that New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Delaware are slated to hold their primaries in September, placing additional pressure on political committees seeking momentum during the late-stage primary window.

For market participants and crypto policy watchers, the significance is less about any single congressional district and more about how crypto-aligned political organizations are operationalizing influence—using media spending to shape voter perceptions while also tying their efforts to the legislative outcomes they want to encourage or defend.

As more FEC disclosures and campaign messaging circulate, readers should watch how the Massachusetts primary debate evolves—particularly whether opponents escalate scrutiny of AI-generated campaign materials and donor ties, and whether PAC spending patterns continue to mirror earlier 2026 efforts in other states with upcoming primaries.

Advertisement

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Binance Adds Options on 1,000 US Stocks and ETFs as TradFi Push Grows

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

Binance is moving deeper into traditional finance, launching options trading on more than 1,000 US stocks and exchange-traded funds for eligible users outside the United States. The exchange says the product will be provided through its Abu Dhabi-regulated broker-dealer, Nest Trading, with orders routed to US-registered Alpaca Securities for execution, clearing, settlement, and custody.

The offering builds on Binance’s existing equities lineup, which includes more than 7,000 US stocks and ETFs. Binance also emphasized that these are physically settled options—meaning users who exercise receive or deliver the underlying shares—rather than equity-linked perpetual futures.

Key takeaways

  • Binance will offer options on 1,000+ US stocks and ETFs to eligible non-US users via Nest Trading.
  • Execution, clearing, settlement, and custody will be handled through orders routed to Alpaca Securities.
  • The options are physically settled, distinguishing them from perpetual futures structures.
  • Binance points to rapidly growing TradFi-related activity, citing a sharp rise in TradFi perpetual futures volume in August.
  • Broader exchange competition is accelerating tokenized equities access across major venues, including Coinbase, Kraken, and Robinhood.

How Binance’s options rollout is structured

Rather than positioning options as a native onchain product, Binance is integrating it into a conventional market plumbing setup. According to Binance, the options will be offered through Nest Trading, its Abu Dhabi-regulated broker-dealer. When users place trades, Binance routes those orders to Alpaca Securities, which is registered in the United States and will manage execution and post-trade operations.

This matters for readers trying to understand what is actually being delivered on the Binance platform. The exchange is not describing a new settlement model or new clearing network; instead, it is extending access to standard equity options while keeping the core regulatory and operational workflow within established TradFi channels.

Physically settled options, not perpetuals

Binance explicitly contrasts the new product with its equity-linked perpetual futures. Unlike perpetual contracts, physically settled options are tied to the underlying asset delivery. If a user exercises, they receive or deliver the corresponding shares.

Advertisement

For traders, that distinction affects both risk management and what happens at expiration. Perpetual futures generally avoid physical delivery mechanics, while physically settled options introduce share-based outcomes if users exercise. In practice, this may better align with strategies that require actual stock exposure or stock-based collateral considerations rather than purely derivatives exposure.

Why the timing: Binance cites surging TradFi trading activity

Binance attributes the rollout to accelerating engagement in traditional financial products on its platform. The exchange specifically cited TradFi perpetual futures volume reaching about $433 billion in August—roughly 15 times January’s total.

This is an important framing because it suggests Binance is responding to measurable demand rather than launching options as a speculative add-on. Still, readers should note that this figure relates to TradFi perpetual futures volume, not necessarily options volume. The company’s argument is that overall interest in TradFi instruments on the platform has surged, creating an environment where options products can find an audience.

Tokenized equities keep expanding across exchanges

Binance’s move sits within a broader push by exchanges and brokerages toward tokenized and onchain-wrapped equity exposure. As crypto venues expand their catalog of TradFi-adjacent products, the onchain stock market has grown quickly over the past year, according to RWA.xyz.

Advertisement

RWA.xyz data shows tokenized stocks have around $2.6 billion in distributed value, up from roughly $346 million a year earlier. It also reports that monthly transfer volume rose 93% over the past 30 days to $25.1 billion, while the number of holders increased 157% to nearly 2.5 million. These figures reflect both increased throughput and broader participation—two conditions that often make additional derivative products more feasible for platforms.

Last week, Coinbase brought its B20 tokenized equities to Base, offering eligible non-US users 24/7 access to onchain versions of well-known US-listed companies including Apple, Nvidia, Meta, and Alphabet. Coinbase also stated that the assets can be used in DeFi contexts such as trading and collateralized borrowing.

Separately, Kraken expanded equities access in August by opening more than 7,000 US-listed stocks for eligible European customers, placing them alongside its tokenized xStocks offerings. In July, Robinhood launched “Robinhood Chain” and introduced a new generation of Stock Tokens available to eligible users across more than 120 countries, highlighting how large brokerages are extending beyond traditional order-book access toward token-based settlement rails.

Taken together, these developments suggest a competitive landscape where venues are layering new TradFi instruments over blockchain-adjacent infrastructure. Binance’s options launch appears to be a continuation of that pattern—moving from spot-style equity access toward derivatives that can serve more complex hedging and exposure strategies.

Advertisement

What to watch next

As Binance rolls out physically settled options for non-US eligible users, traders and investors should pay attention to how order routing and settlement behave in practice on the platform—especially around exercise, delivery workflows, and any product-specific eligibility constraints. Longer term, the key question is whether demand for derivatives on these platforms scales at the same pace as tokenized equity adoption and TradFi perpetual futures activity.

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

XRP price targets $1.70 as Bitwise ETF tops $500M

Published

on

XRP price chart, source: crypto.news

XRP traded near $1.37 on Sept. 1 after retreating from its August peak near $1.70, leaving traders divided over whether its recent breakout remains intact.

Summary

  • XRP traded near $1.37 after losing 8.2% weekly while remaining up 25.9% monthly overall.
  • Bitwise XRP ETF held 365.35 million tokens worth $507.23 million as of August 30, official data showed.
  • Analyst Ali Martinez placed XRP’s next target at $1.70 after calling resistance cleared this week.
  • Daily RSI remained positive near 60.6, while MACD showed weakening short-term bullish momentum currently overall.
  • XRP must hold support near $1.30–$1.35 and reclaim $1.50–$1.60 to strengthen its rebound case further.

The token fell approximately 0.6% over 24 hours and 8.2% during the preceding seven days, according to crypto.news data. XRP remained up 25.9% over 30 days following its recovery from the $1 area.

Analyst Ali Martinez said XRP had “cleared resistance” and described the breakout as confirmed. He placed the next target at $1.70, although price had already moved back below the breakout area by the time of reporting.

Advertisement

XRP price tests support after its August rally

XRP’s daily chart shows a strong recovery from its August low followed by a pullback from the $1.70 region. The price is now consolidating around $1.36 to $1.38, near an area that previously acted as resistance.

The immediate support range sits between $1.30 and $1.35. Holding this area would preserve the sequence of higher lows established during the August rebound. A daily close below it would weaken the short-term structure and expose lower support near $1.27.

The first major resistance range is between $1.50 and $1.60. XRP would need to reclaim that zone and hold above it before another test of $1.70 becomes more credible.

Advertisement

XRP remains in a broader downtrend when measured from its previous highs above $3. The recent recovery improved its short-term structure, but it has not yet confirmed a full reversal of that longer decline.

The Relative Strength Index stood near 60.6 on the daily chart. A reading above 50 indicates that positive momentum remains, although the indicator has fallen from its recent overbought level.

XRP price chart, source: crypto.news
XRP price chart, source: crypto.news

The RSI also remained below its moving average near 72.3, showing that momentum cooled as XRP retreated from the August peak. The indicator is no longer overheated, but it has not produced a fresh acceleration signal.

Bitwise XRP ETF crosses $507 million

The Bitwise XRP ETF held approximately 365.35 million XRP worth $507.23 million as of Aug. 30, according to the fund’s official data.

The NYSE Arca-listed product had 32.71 million shares outstanding and charged an expense ratio of 0.34%. Coinbase Custody Trust held the fund’s XRP, while Bank of New York Mellon served as trust custodian and administrator.

The latest total represented a sharp increase from June 30, when the fund held 286.84 million XRP and reported $299.15 million in net assets. Its holdings therefore increased by approximately 78.5 million XRP between quarter-end and Aug. 30.

Advertisement

A rising asset total does not come entirely from new investor cash. Assets under management can increase through share creations, which require additional XRP, and through gains in the token’s market price.

Bitwise’s second-quarter filing showed that investors added approximately 181.53 million XRP worth $269.85 million through share creations during the first half of 2026. Redemptions removed about 25.61 million XRP.

The trust’s net assets rose from $241.37 million at the end of December to $299.15 million on June 30 despite a $176.61 million decrease from operations. The filing attributed most of that reduction to XRP falling from $1.82 to $1.04 during the period.

XRP breakout targets remain unconfirmed

Martinez’s $1.70 target is a technical forecast rather than an assured price level. XRP must first remain above support and recover the resistance lost during its latest pullback.

Advertisement

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence indicator also points to weaker momentum. The MACD line stood near 0.0834, slightly below its signal line around 0.0851, while the histogram was marginally negative.

This configuration suggests that the bullish momentum behind the August recovery is fading. It does not yet establish a strong bearish trend because both MACD lines remain above zero.

Other analysts have offered wider forecasts. Diana identified potential targets at $1.88 and $7.07 using Elliott Wave analysis, while XRP Update proposed levels extending from $2.50 to $13.

Those projections rely on patterns and assumptions that have not been confirmed by subsequent price action. They should not be presented as expected outcomes.

Advertisement

The bearish scenario also remains active. Crypto Lens said XRP could fall toward $1.17 before beginning another recovery. ChartNerd identified the 20-week exponential moving average near $1.27 as a possible support floor after XRP failed to reclaim its 50-week average.

ETF demand has not prevented XRP volatility

Institutional demand through U.S. exchange-traded products has continued despite XRP’s price swings. As crypto.news previously reported, XRP ETF trading volume reached an all-time high during the August rally.

Advertisement

Seven U.S. spot XRP funds had recorded approximately $1.57 billion in cumulative net inflows by Aug. 24. The latest external estimates placed that total above $1.6 billion by the end of the month.

ETF creations can require issuers or authorized participants to obtain more XRP. However, fund demand does not guarantee price gains because selling from other market participants can offset those purchases.

XRP previously recorded its strongest weekly rally since the SEC settlement before entering the current correction. The sharp rise and subsequent pullback show that institutional inflows have not removed short-term volatility.

The next confirmation will come from price rather than analyst targets. Holding $1.30 to $1.35 would keep the recovery structure intact. Reclaiming $1.50 to $1.60 would strengthen the case for another $1.70 test, while losing support would shift attention toward $1.27 and $1.17.

Advertisement

Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

3 Reasons Why Shiba Inu (SHIB) May Plunge This Month

Published

on

July and August have been quite successful for the self-proclaimed Dogecoin killer, with its price closing both months in the green.

Nonetheless, certain important elements suggest that September may not be as beneficial and could deliver a move south.

The Worrying Signals

The first concerning element on the list is Shiba Inu’s burn rate, which has declined by 6% on a monthly scale. Data shows that less than 600 million tokens have been sent to a null address throughout August, an amount whose USD equivalent is negligible.

The burning mechanism aims to reduce the overall supply of the meme coin and potentially make it more valuable, but little to no activity on that front poses a serious obstacle to that mission.

Advertisement

Next is Shibarium’s stalled activity. The layer-2 scaling solution was exploited last year, and since then, the number of processed daily transactions has dropped to mere hundreds or even thousands (at most).

Shibarium Transactions
Shibarium Transactions, Source: shibariumscan.io

The feature has been labeled numerous times as important for the overall advancement of Shiba Inu’s ecosystem and something that can positively impact its price.

Last but not least, we shall mention the seasonal element. September has been a predominantly poor month for SHIB, with its price finishing the period in the red three out of five times. In 2022, July and August were green (just like this year), yet the following month stopped the uptrend. We have yet to see whether history will repeat itself.

SHIB Monthly Returns
SHIB Monthly Returns, Source: CryptoRank

The Bright Side

Not all aspects suggest that the meme coin could experience a downtrend in the coming weeks.

According to CryptoQuant, the amount of SHIB held on exchanges has declined over the past month, signaling that investors continue to abandon centralized platforms in favor of self-custody. This, in turn, reduces immediate selling pressure and could set the stage for a potential additional price ascent.

SHIB Exchange Reserve
SHIB Exchange Reserve, Source: CryptoQuant

The post 3 Reasons Why Shiba Inu (SHIB) May Plunge This Month appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Predict.fun rolls out self-service developer dashboard

Published

on

Kalshi faces $54M lawsuit over Khamenei prediction market

Predict.fun has launched a self-service developer dashboard that lets builders create applications, generate API keys, monitor usage and manage rate limits from one interface.

Summary

  • Developers can create Predict.fun applications and generate API keys without opening a manual support request.
  • The dashboard displays API usage and lets developers request higher usage-based rate-limit tiers.
  • Existing API keys can be imported into the portal for centralized management.
  • New applications receive trade burst limits for order creation and cancellation by default.

Predict.fun developer dashboard centralizes API access

Predict.fun said in a post on X that the new portal gives developers direct control over several tasks previously handled through separate support channels. Users can create applications, issue keys, and view their current usage limits through the dashboard.

Existing keys can also be imported, allowing developers with active integrations to manage them alongside newly created credentials. Predict.fun did not disclose whether imported keys retain their current permissions or require any changes during the transfer.

Advertisement

Before the dashboard launch, Predict.fun’s public developer documentation directed users to join its Discord server and open a support ticket to request an API key. The documentation describes the platform’s REST API as a beta product and asks developers to report problems through the same Discord channel.

Moving key generation into a self-service portal removes that manual step for new applications. Predict.fun did not specify whether Discord-based requests will remain available or whether all future key management will move to the dashboard.

The portal also gives developers access to their usage and rate-limit information. When an application requires more capacity, its owner can manually request a higher usage-based tier through the interface, according to the announcement.

Advertisement

Predict.fun did not publish the request criteria, review period, or call allowances attached to each tier. The company also did not say whether access to higher limits carries a fee or depends on an application’s trading activity.

Trade burst limits apply to order activity

Alongside the dashboard, Predict.fun has introduced “trade burst” limits covering calls used to create and cancel orders. The control restricts how many of those requests an application can send each second.

Every new application will have the restriction enabled by default. Existing applications will receive the burst limit the next time their owners request an adjustment to their rate limits, rather than having it added immediately across all active integrations.

The company did not disclose the number of order calls allowed per second or whether the ceiling differs between usage tiers. It also did not provide separate limits for creating and canceling orders.

Advertisement

Predict.fun’s API documentation shows that developers can submit new orders, remove individual orders, and cancel groups of orders through dedicated endpoints. Applications can also retrieve market data, order books, market statistics, account activity, and user positions.

For live data, the platform provides WebSocket connections covering subscriptions, response formats, and heartbeats. Its developer tools also include OAuth endpoints through which an integrated application can finalize a connection, place or cancel orders, and retrieve a connected user’s positions.

The order-related restrictions apply to the rate at which applications send requests, not to the number of markets developers can display or the total positions held by users. Predict.fun did not announce changes to its market-data, account, or WebSocket limits.

No security incident or service disruption was cited as the reason for introducing the controls. The company described them as part of the updated usage-management system available through its developer portal.

Advertisement

Dashboard follows Predict.fun’s BNB Chain expansion

The developer release follows several additions to Predict.fun’s distribution and infrastructure during 2026. Built on BNB Chain, the platform lets users trade tokenized positions tied to outcomes in categories including crypto, sports, politics, and economic events.

Predict.fun completed its acquisition of Probable in March. Probable had been incubated by PancakeSwap and YZi Labs before its technology was folded into Predict.fun’s product stack.

The companies said the transaction would combine their work on market design, order execution, and collateral use. Binance founder Changpeng Zhao welcomed the deal at the time, describing it as a combination of two projects operating in BNB Chain’s prediction-market sector.

In April, YZi Labs disclosed a follow-on Predict.fun investment that included Susquehanna Crypto, the digital-asset arm of Susquehanna International Group. Figures shared with the announcement showed that Predict.fun had processed more than 4 million orders and over $1.8 billion in cumulative trading volume since launching in December 2025.

Advertisement

YZi Labs said Predict.fun had graduated from the second season of its EASY Residency program. The investor described the protocol as combining self-custody, gasless transactions, and yield earned on collateral while prediction positions remain open.

Developer access could allow third-party interfaces and trading services to connect to the same underlying markets, although Predict.fun has not named any new applications built through the dashboard. The platform’s API already supports market discovery, order-book data, trade execution, account activity and position tracking.

Predict.fun’s existing distribution includes Binance Wallet, which added in-app market access in April. Under that integration, Predict.fun operates the events, pricing, and resolution rules while eligible Binance Wallet users reach the markets through the Binance app.

The integration supports market and limit orders, with transactions executed through Predict.fun’s smart contracts. Binance Wallet said it sponsors trading and settlement gas fees and allows users to trade with balances held in their spot and funding accounts.

Advertisement

US prediction markets face separate access rules

Predict.fun did not state whether applications created through the dashboard may serve users in the United States. Its announcement focused on developer access, key management and technical request limits rather than regional availability or regulatory permissions.

For US developers, an API key does not itself establish permission to offer event contracts to American customers. Platforms serving that market can face federal commodities requirements as well as state rules governing sports betting and gambling products.

Binance.US said in July that it planned to seek a Commodity Futures Trading Commission-designated contract market license as part of its effort to offer federally regulated prediction markets. If approved, the license would allow the exchange to list event contracts under CFTC oversight.

The reported CFTC license plan would place Binance.US in a segment that already includes federally regulated operators such as Kalshi and Polymarket US. Coinbase has also provided event-contract access through a partnership with Kalshi.

Advertisement

State authorities continue to dispute whether federal commodities oversight prevents them from enforcing local gambling rules against some sports-related contracts. Predict.fun’s dashboard announcement did not address that conflict, identify supported US jurisdictions, or announce a US-regulated entity.

The company also did not provide a timetable for taking the REST API out of beta. Its public documentation continues to list endpoints for categories, markets, orders, accounts, positions, search, and OAuth, along with TypeScript and Python authentication guides.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitcoin slips below $77.5K as macro pressure offsets ETF inflows

Published

on

Bitcoin daily chart shows BTC near $77,522 above all major moving averages, while RSI cools to 66 after an overbought reading.

Bitcoin traded near $77,500 on Sept. 1 as rising oil prices, higher bond yields and renewed US rate-hike concerns outweighed strong spot ETF inflows, while short-term technical indicators pointed to weakening momentum.

Summary

  • Bitcoin fell 1.6% in 24 hours after retreating from an intraday high near $79,225.
  • The 4-hour price reached its lower Bollinger Band as trend strength dropped to a weak reading.
  • US spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded $216.7 million in net inflows during the latest completed session.
  • Liquidation data show leveraged positions clustered near $76,500–$77,000 and above $79,500.

Bitcoin price loses short-term support

According to data from crypto.news, Bitcoin (BTC) price was trading around $77,500 at the time of writing, down approximately 1.6% over the previous 24 hours. The asset reached $79,225 earlier in the session before sellers pushed it to an intraday low of $77,318.

The retreat took Bitcoin below the $77,700–$78,000 short-term support range and left it about 4.6% below the recent local high near $81,280.

Advertisement

BTC remains well above its main daily moving averages despite the pullback. The daily chart places the 20-day simple moving average at $73,198, while the 50-day and 100-day averages sit at $67,924 and $66,285, respectively.

Bitcoin daily chart shows BTC near $77,522 above all major moving averages, while RSI cools to 66 after an overbought reading.
Bitcoin price daily chart — Sep. 1 | Source: crypto.news

Bitcoin also remains above the 200-day SMA near $69,504. The alignment leaves the broader trend constructive, as shorter moving averages have moved above their longer-term counterparts following August’s rally.

Daily momentum has started to cool, however. The relative strength index has fallen to 66 from an earlier overbought reading above 70. An RSI above 50 still favors buyers, but the decline suggests the market is losing some momentum after its rapid move from the $64,000 area.

Rising oil prices and yields pressure Bitcoin

The pullback followed renewed pressure across global markets as oil prices and government bond yields moved higher.

Advertisement

Brent crude rose roughly 2% to $92.04 per barrel as renewed fighting between the United States and Iran revived concerns over supply disruptions.

More expensive energy can keep inflation elevated by raising transportation and production costs. Persistent inflation would reduce the Federal Reserve’s room to lower interest rates and could revive expectations for tighter US monetary policy.

A simultaneous global bond selloff pushed yields higher, adding pressure to risk assets. Rising yields make interest-bearing government securities more attractive relative to assets such as Bitcoin, which does not generate a fixed return.

The macro pressure arrived despite renewed demand for US spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds. Farside Investors data show that the products attracted a combined $216.7 million during the latest completed trading session.

Advertisement

BlackRock’s IBIT accounted for $205.9 million of the total. The daily inflow reversed the $201.9 million net withdrawal recorded on Aug. 28, though Bitcoin’s subsequent decline suggests macro-related selling temporarily exceeded ETF demand.

4-hour indicators point to weak momentum

Bitcoin’s 4-hour chart shows the price testing the lower Bollinger Band at approximately $77,473. The band’s middle line stands near $78,262, while the upper boundary sits at $79,050.

Bitcoin 4-hour chart shows BTC testing the lower Bollinger Band near $77,473, with a weak ADX reading of 12.58.
Bitcoin price 4-hour chart — Sep. 1 | Source: crypto.news

Trading near the lower band reflects immediate selling pressure, but it does not confirm a larger breakdown by itself. A recovery above the middle band would put $79,050 back in focus, while a 4-hour close below the lower boundary could expose the recent lows.

The average directional index has dropped to 12.6 on the same timeframe. An ADX reading below 20 normally indicates that neither buyers nor sellers control a strong trend, making range-bound and uneven price action more likely.

BTC would need to recover the $78,260 Bollinger midpoint before challenging $79,050. Above that level, the $79,500–$80,000 zone represents the next major resistance area, followed by the recent peaks between $80,800 and $81,300.

Advertisement

Failure to recover the middle band would leave Bitcoin vulnerable to another test of $77,000. A confirmed close below that level would weaken the short-term structure even though the daily moving averages remain bullish.

Liquidation clusters surround the current price

CoinGlass’s one-week liquidation heatmap shows a growing concentration of leveraged positions just below Bitcoin’s current market price.

Bitcoin one-week liquidation heatmap shows liquidity concentrated near $76,500–$77,000 below price and around $79,500–$82,000 above.
Bitcoin liquidation heatmap | Source: CoinGlass

The nearest liquidity cluster appears between approximately $76,500 and $77,000. A larger downside pool is visible closer to $76,000, giving traders two nearby levels to watch if selling accelerates.

Upside liquidity is concentrated around $79,500, with additional clusters between $80,000 and $82,000. Price can gravitate toward areas containing large concentrations of leveraged positions, but the heatmap does not predict which cluster will be reached first.

Derivatives data do not currently point to widespread forced deleveraging. Notably, about $33 million in Bitcoin liquidations, including $19.6 million in long positions and $13.4 million in shorts.

Advertisement

Bitcoin futures open interest stood near $25.3 billion, rising only 0.6%–0.9% over 24 hours. Average funding remained positive at 0.0066% per eight hours, below the commonly referenced 0.01% baseline. The combination suggests leveraged traders remain positioned, but bullish exposure is not yet unusually crowded.

Bitcoin must defend the $76,500 support zone

The $76,500–$77,000 region is Bitcoin’s main immediate support. The lower 4-hour Bollinger Band and a nearby liquidation cluster add technical importance to that range.

A sustained break below $76,500 could extend the decline toward $75,700–$76,000. If buyers fail to defend that secondary area, the daily chart points to $72,500–$73,200 as the next major support, with the 20-day SMA reinforcing the upper end of the zone.

The bullish scenario requires Bitcoin to reclaim $77,700–$78,260 and then close above $79,050. A move through $79,500–$80,000 could trigger liquidations among short positions and reopen the path toward $81,000–$82,000.

Advertisement

Pseudonymous trader Eliz maintained a longer-term bullish view despite the short-term volatility, describing purchases above the $65,000–$68,000 range as a “bargain” and saying Bitcoin would eventually trade higher. The forecast remains the trader’s opinion rather than a confirmed market outcome.

For US investors, oil prices, Treasury yields and expectations for the Federal Reserve’s next policy decision remain the main external catalysts. ETF inflows continue to provide institutional demand, but Bitcoin’s next directional move may depend on whether buyers can defend $76,500 while macro conditions remain restrictive.

Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

What Trump’s Most-Favored-Nation Deal Means for Drug Prices

Published

on

What Trump's Most-Favored-Nation Deal Means for Drug Prices

Of course, it’s hard to know even how much the deal will save to Medicaid programs, he says. That’s because the terms of the deals are not publicly available, and neither are the prices Medicaid pays.  

One research letter in JAMA from July estimated that the most-favored-nation policies from 17 pharmaceutical companies that had already been agreed to would lead to $8.6 billion in savings a year for Medicaid programs. 

But those savings are likely only for the short term, says one of that study’s authors, Dr. Thomas Hwang, an assistant professor at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. “Long-term savings are likely illusory,” he says. That’s because evidence suggests that after most-favored-nation deals, companies often raise prices in other countries so that the prices that the U.S. compares its prices to will be higher. 

Already, the U.K. has agreed to cover drugs at higher prices than it did previously, says Dr. Suhas Gondi, an instructor at Harvard Medical School. He predicts that pharmaceutical companies will try to game the agreement by deciding not to launch new drugs in some countries so they won’t have to compare prices to that country.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

4 Investment Committee Members on the September Setup: Why None Are Selling

Published

on

The Investment Committee explain how they are setting up their portfolios as we head into September

Wall Street’s biggest desks turned defensive as September opened. CNBC’s Investment Committee did the opposite. None of its four members plans to sell.

The split comes as stocks enter the month after 27 record closes this year. September is also the weakest month on the calendar.

Why Wall Street Is Buying Protection

Scott Rubner runs equity and equity derivatives strategy at Citadel Securities and came from Goldman Sachs. His August 31 note made three points.

  • Earnings are done.

Companies authorized more than $1.1 trillion in buybacks through August. Those buyers go quiet from September 12.

  • Retail steps back too.

Rubner’s data shows September has the year’s weakest dip buying. Purchases on down days run near half the normal pace.

  • Hedges are cheap.

The VIX closed August at 14.4, its second lowest finish since December 2025.

“Use strength to reduce some exposure and add inexpensive protection into this event window,” he noted.

Others followed, with JPMorgan’s trading desk moving to neutral. Wells Fargo turned cautious on fears that AI spending has peaked.

Advertisement

Both were far more bullish weeks ago, when JPMorgan raised S&P forecasts as hedging demand dried up.

Why the Committee Is Not Selling

  • Joe Terranova, Virtus Investment Partners

Momentum fell double digits this quarter while quality rose 1.5%. The market has somewhere to land, he says, so he will not turn bearish yet.

  • Stephanie Link, Hightower

She is not trying to time the month. Any dip becomes a chance to add to positions she has been building. Value has beaten growth by 14% this year.

  • Jason Snipe, Odyssey Capital Advisors

He calls himself a long-term investor, not a tactical trader. A soft patch is where he adds exposure.

  • Josh Brown, Ritholtz Wealth Management

Momentum peaked on June 22 and has fallen 13.7% since. That rotation already happened, he argues. Trading the calendar only creates taxable gains.

The Investment Committee explain how they are setting up their portfolios as we head into September
The Investment Committee explain how they are setting up their portfolios as we head into September. Source: CNBC

Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens

However, the record is milder than the reputation, because since 1950, September has cost the S&P 500 just 0.6% on average. The month still finished higher 34 times out of 75.

The economy is also holding up. Job openings stayed at 7.3 million in July, the Labor Department reported Tuesday.

Bitcoin (BTC) faces the same test. BTC traded near $77,130 on Tuesday, down over 2% over the last 24 hours. Both markets carry a weak September seasonality record.

Bitcoin Price Performance. Source: BeInCrypto
Bitcoin Price Performance. Source: BeInCrypto

The desks are paying for insurance. The committee is waiting for the sale.

The post 4 Investment Committee Members on the September Setup: Why None Are Selling appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Wall Street Stock Records Could Move On-Chain. One Trader Punished for Deleting His

Published

on

Major County Sheriffs of America Drop Opposition to CLARITY Act

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) proposed new transfer agent rules on Tuesday. A blockchain could become the official record of who owns a share.

The same day, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) settled with a swaps trader. He had erased messages regulators ordered him to keep. Both actions turn on what counts as an official record.

Stock Records On-Chain Depend on One Obscure Firm

Transfer agents sit behind every public company share. They keep the master securityholder file, which is the issuer’s legal list of who owns what; they also route dividends and process transfers.

Washington has not rewritten those rules since the early 1980s, but Tuesday’s package amends existing rules and forms, rescinds one rule, and adds several new ones. Commissioner Hester Peirce said on X (twitter) that the proposal took more than a decade.

Advertisement

Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens

Chairman Paul Atkins tied the update to technology the industry already uses.

“This proposal would streamline and modernize the Commission’s rules to reflect transfer agents’ current processes and operations, including the use of electronic communications and blockchain technology in connection with securities offerings and the transfer of shares,” read an excerpt in the announcement, citing Atkins.

That line decides whether a token is a share or a wrapper around one. A transfer only carries legal weight when the chain feeds the official file. Meanwhile the tokenization ownership gap has widened while the rules stood still.

Advertisement

Securitize, Computershare, and Equiniti have already moved for the work, BeInCrypto’s transfer agent guide explains. Registrars would also disclose which securities they tokenize and which networks host them.

A $90,000 Penalty for Messages That Vanished

Elsewhere, the CFTC closed the opposite kind of case. A federal court in Manhattan entered a consent order against John Patrick Gorman III. He is a US dollar swaps trader and a managing director at a global investment bank.

Enforcement staff told Gorman in March 2019 to preserve documents. He deleted WhatsApp threads and one text message instead.

Advertisement

Two months on, he wrote to the agency claiming he had destroyed nothing. He repeated that account under testimony in November 2019.

“Attempts to impede or obstruct the Commission’s investigations go to the very heart of the division’s ability to detect wrongdoing and enforce the law,” the CFTC said in its release, citing David Miller, the agency’s enforcement director.

The order fines Gorman $90,000 and permanently bars him from repeating the conduct. Regulators still rely on what a trader chooses to keep, which is the weakness a shared ledger removes.

The post Wall Street Stock Records Could Move On-Chain. One Trader Punished for Deleting His appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025