Connect with us

Crypto World

Regional banks must partner with crypto startups now

Published

on

Adam Turmakhan

Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of crypto.news’ editorial.

The GENIUS Act has turbocharged the United States stablecoin market, and the U.S.’s biggest banks are already cashing in. Regional banks must partner with crypto startups now if they are to bridge the digital gap, provide customers with access to the market, and share in booming stablecoin revenues. If not, they risk being locked out of the market entirely by their larger counterparts.

Advertisement

Summary

  • Stablecoins are now a revenue line, not a side bet: $33T in annual volume and multibillion-dollar bank revenues show the opportunity is already being captured.
  • Regional banks can’t outspend — but they can outpartner: Collaborating with regulated crypto startups lets them skip costly R&D and compete with Big Four infrastructure.
  • The real risk is hesitation: As regulation matures and giants lock in early market share, inaction could permanently shut regional banks out of stablecoin payment flows.

In such a gloomy, bearish market environment, stablecoins have emerged as the unlikely winners. Courtesy of the dial-moving GENIUS Act, the market has been given its long-overdue seal of regulatory approval, seeing a mass uptick in consumer sentiment and institutional embrace as a result. Demand is high, mood is high, and the market is at its peak. And with a huge upside ready for the taking, regional banks cannot afford to miss out on their time in the spotlight.

Stablecoin transaction volumes rose to a record $33tn in 2025, and JPMorgan’s payments division generated over $4bn in revenue in Q2 alone last year after launching its own token. Amid current reports of earnings surges across Wall Street, one thing is clear to me: those who take the risk and invest in their ability to facilitate stablecoin transactions will win customers and revenues.

Advertisement

Of course, there is an obvious difference in scale between the Big Four and regional banks — but regional institutions do not need to dominate the market to benefit from it. Even in states that you’d expect to be brick-and-mortar strongholds, like Wyoming, consumer demand is booming. 

Crucially, regional banks also have a strong presence in these communities. By tapping into stablecoins, they can attract new customers, including higher earners who are more likely to adopt cryptocurrency-based payment methods. Attracting and retaining customers are two of the biggest problems executives at these banks tell me they face, which is exactly why stablecoins must become a strategic priority if they are going to expand their customer base.

The problem is that many regional banks are already behind the curve on industry digitalization. It’s no secret that these capital-tight institutions don’t have the billion-dollar budgets of Bank of America and JPMorgan to invest in new technology, specialized stablecoin-friendly infrastructure, and in-house experimentation. That then leaves the question: how can these banks offer customers access to the stablecoin market, quickly, cost-effectively, and before the Big Four captures the bulk of consumer demand?

My answer is to partner with agile, frontline crypto startups. There are hundreds of cryptocurrency payment startups operating across the U.S. that can help regional banks bridge the digital gap. Equally, by leveraging startups’ tech-forward infrastructure, regional banks can skip costly in-house experimentation to meet consumer demand more efficiently.

Advertisement

On a larger scale, this way of thinking has already proven successful. JPMorgan, Standard Chartered, and others have partnerships with a variety of small- to large-cap crypto businesses, including Coinbase, Circle, and the startup Digital Asset. Non-traditional institutions, too, like Stripe, followed this route last year — acquiring the stablecoin orchestration platform Bridge to expand their offerings. It’s already tried and tested, which is why regional banks must also follow suit if they want a share of the spoils.

Of course, I’m not blind to the risks. The stablecoin market has a checkered past that carries significant reputational challenges, and regional banks are right to be cautious. Investors lost $40bn when TerraUSD crashed in 2022, and I have no doubt that weighs on executives’ minds.

But that was four years ago. Crypto — and indeed, stablecoins — are no longer the Wild West of financial services. In fact, with the GENIUS Act clarifying regulatory frameworks and strengthening anti-money laundering protections, stablecoins have become rapidly more mainstream in the global payments landscape for institutions and consumers alike.

Rather, concerns about the risks stablecoins pose are precisely why these partnerships are so critical. Regional banks, by working with regulated startups that already have technical frameworks, will be able to mitigate risk and avoid the costly mistakes that could come with building untested systems in-house.

Advertisement

The bigger danger facing regional banks is inaction. The four biggest U.S. banks currently command over half the industry’s total profits — and their dominance will only grow as they sweep up payments revenues. As regulation matures and larger banks lock in early market share, regional banks face a narrowing window of opportunity to capitalize on consumer demand.

Given that these larger institutions are unlikely to want to dilute their potential share of stablecoin revenues across thousands of competitors, the race to meet consumer demand is well and truly underway. If regional banks wait, they will gift industry titans yet another competitive edge, one that they just cannot afford to lose.

Adam Turmakhan

Advertisement

Adam Turmakhan

Adam Turmakhan is the CEO of TurmaFinTech, a Florida-based fintech startup that offers bespoke customer data platforms for community banks and credit unions across the U.S.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crypto World

Ripple or Cardano Will Hold Up Better?

Published

on

Ripple or Cardano Will Hold Up Better?


ChatGPT picked a clear winner in all categories.

Needless to say, the cryptocurrency industry has seen better days, with the prices of countless assets collapsing by 50% or more in the past several months. This has propelled analysts to speculate that this is no longer a bull market correction; instead, the majority believes the bear phase has begun.

If that’s the case, then let’s see which altcoins between two of the most popular ones – XRP and ADA – can cope better under times of uncertainty, fear, and sell-offs.

Advertisement

Narrative and Market Structure

To gain further perspective on the matter from an unbiased analysis, we decided to touch upon perhaps the most widely utilized AI chatbot solution – ChatGPT. It began by acknowledging the fact that the narrative in crypto has shifted from “how high can this asset go” to “which altcoin is likely to lose less.”

When it came to comparing the two altcoins in question, the AI platform outlined several categories in which either one can outshine the other. In market structure and liquidity, it noted that XRP typically benefits from deep exchange liquidity, high derivatives activity, and strong global trading presence.

Although ADA also has strong liquidity, it has historically shown higher volatility during drawdowns and has been more aggressively sold by retail investors. As such, this point went for Ripple’s cross-border token, which actually took the second win as well, dubbed “narrative resilience.”

ChatGPT noted that XRP’s value proposition revolves around cross-border payments, institutional rails, and regulatory positioning, while ADA’s thesis centers on smart contracts, ecosystem development, and long-term infrastructure growth.

Advertisement

“During bear cycles, institutional and regulatory narratives often carry more defensive weight than ecosystem growth promises, especially when speculative activity declines,” it added.

Community and Historical Performance

The last two categories mentioned in the subheading above also had the same winner. ChatGPT said ADA has historically experienced more extreme percentage declines from cycle tops, while XRP “tends to consolidate in tighter ranges during late-stage bear phases.”

You may also like:

In terms of community and holder behavior, ChatGPT’s answer was less obvious. It admitted that both have strong and vocal communities, but “ADA’s retail-heavy base can amplify panic selling.”

In contrast, XRP’s holder base has historically shown “stronger long-term holding behavior during legal and regulatory uncertainty periods.”

Consequently, OpenAI’s platform determined the following in a confirmed bear market:

Advertisement
  • XRP is slightly more likely to show resilience
  • ADA could face deeper volatility and sharper pecentage drawdowns

However, it warned that if BTC continues to trend lower, neither of the aforementioned altcoins is immune to additional double-digit percentage declines.

SPECIAL OFFER (Exclusive)

SECRET PARTNERSHIP BONUS for CryptoPotato readers: Use this link to register and unlock $1,500 in exclusive BingX Exchange rewards (limited time offer).

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Ethereum ETFs Turn Positive as ETH Reclaims $2K

Published

on

Ethereum ETF data

Ethereum spot ETFs recorded $10.26 million in net inflows on February 13, breaking a two-day outflow streak that saw $242.28 million in redemptions.

Summary

  • Ethereum ETFs added $10M as ETH price reclaimed $2,000.
  • Bitcoin ETFs saw modest $15M inflows after prior outflows.
  • Weekly ETH ETF flows remain negative despite rebound.

Grayscale’s mini ETH trust led flows with $14.51 million, followed by VanEck’s ETHV at $3.00 million and Fidelity’s FETH at $2.04 million.

Ethereum (ETH) price gained 5.8% over 24 hours to reclaim the $2,000 level, trading in a range of $1,926.66 to $2,067.44.

Advertisement

The recovery follows sharp declines across longer timeframes: down 1.2% over seven days, 23.7% over 14 days, 37.5% over 30 days, and 24.4% over one year.

Weekly Ethereum outflows persist at $161 million

Ethereum ETFs recorded $161.15 million in weekly net outflows for the period ending February 13 despite the final day’s positive flow.

February 11 posted the week’s largest single-day withdrawal at $129.18 million, followed by February 12’s $113.10 million in redemptions.

Advertisement

February 9-10 briefly interrupted selling with $70.87 million in combined inflows. February 9 saw $57.05 million in positive flows while February 10 added $13.82 million.

Ethereum ETF data
Ethereum ETF data: SoSo Value

The week ending February 6 posted $165.82 million in outflows, while the week ending January 30 recorded $326.93 million in redemptions.

The week ending January 23 marked the peak with $611.17 million in withdrawals as Ethereum fell from above $3,000 to below $2,000.

Total value traded reached $1.10 billion on February 13, down from $880.33 million the previous day.

Advertisement

Bitcoin posts modest $15 million inflow with mixed fund flows

Bitcoin spot ETFs recorded $15.20 million in net inflows on February 13, led by Fidelity’s FBTC with $11.99 million.

Grayscale’s mini BTC trust added $6.99 million while VanEck’s HODL contributed $1.95 million and WisdomTree’s BTCW posted $3.64 million.

BlackRock’s IBIT recorded $9.36 million in outflows and was its third withdrawal in four trading days.

February 11-12 saw Bitcoin ETFs post $686.67 million in combined outflows before February 13’s reversal.

Advertisement

Ethereum’s 5.8% daily gain allowed it to reclaim the $2,000 level after dipping below $1,930 earlier in the session.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Memecoins’ Silence Could Signal a Comeback: Santiment

Published

on

Cryptocurrencies, Adoption

A reversal in memecoins could come sooner than traders expect, even amid choppy conditions across the broader crypto market, if history is any indication, according to crypto sentiment platform Santiment.

“There is a growing narrative of “nostalgia” regarding memecoins, with many traders treating the sector as if it is permanently dead,” Santiment said in a report published on Friday.

Cryptocurrencies, Adoption
Dogecoin’s price, which has historically moved significantly during memecoin uptrends, is down 32% over the past 30 days. Source: CoinMarketCap

“This collective acceptance of the ‘end of the meme era’ is a classic capitulation signal,” Santiment said, explaining that when a sector of the market is completely written off, it is often the “contrarian time” to start paying attention.

“Watch sectors that the crowd has left for dead; max pain often marks the bottom,” Santiment said.

Memecoin market cap falls amid market decline

The total memecoin market capitalization has fallen 34.04% to $31.02 billion over the past 30 days amid a wider crypto market decline that saw Bitcoin (BTC) fall near $60,000 on Feb. 3, the lowest point the asset’s price has been since October 2024, according to CoinMarketCap.

Advertisement

Among the top 100 cryptocurrencies, memecoin gains over the past seven days were mostly modest, except for outlier Pippin (PIPPIN), which surged 243.17%. The next best performers were Official Trump (TRUMP), up 1.37%, and Shiba Inu (SHIB), up 1.11%.