Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

Regional banks must partner with crypto startups now

Published

on

Adam Turmakhan

Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of crypto.news’ editorial.

The GENIUS Act has turbocharged the United States stablecoin market, and the U.S.’s biggest banks are already cashing in. Regional banks must partner with crypto startups now if they are to bridge the digital gap, provide customers with access to the market, and share in booming stablecoin revenues. If not, they risk being locked out of the market entirely by their larger counterparts.

Advertisement

Summary

  • Stablecoins are now a revenue line, not a side bet: $33T in annual volume and multibillion-dollar bank revenues show the opportunity is already being captured.
  • Regional banks can’t outspend — but they can outpartner: Collaborating with regulated crypto startups lets them skip costly R&D and compete with Big Four infrastructure.
  • The real risk is hesitation: As regulation matures and giants lock in early market share, inaction could permanently shut regional banks out of stablecoin payment flows.

In such a gloomy, bearish market environment, stablecoins have emerged as the unlikely winners. Courtesy of the dial-moving GENIUS Act, the market has been given its long-overdue seal of regulatory approval, seeing a mass uptick in consumer sentiment and institutional embrace as a result. Demand is high, mood is high, and the market is at its peak. And with a huge upside ready for the taking, regional banks cannot afford to miss out on their time in the spotlight.

Stablecoin transaction volumes rose to a record $33tn in 2025, and JPMorgan’s payments division generated over $4bn in revenue in Q2 alone last year after launching its own token. Amid current reports of earnings surges across Wall Street, one thing is clear to me: those who take the risk and invest in their ability to facilitate stablecoin transactions will win customers and revenues.

Advertisement

Of course, there is an obvious difference in scale between the Big Four and regional banks — but regional institutions do not need to dominate the market to benefit from it. Even in states that you’d expect to be brick-and-mortar strongholds, like Wyoming, consumer demand is booming. 

Crucially, regional banks also have a strong presence in these communities. By tapping into stablecoins, they can attract new customers, including higher earners who are more likely to adopt cryptocurrency-based payment methods. Attracting and retaining customers are two of the biggest problems executives at these banks tell me they face, which is exactly why stablecoins must become a strategic priority if they are going to expand their customer base.

The problem is that many regional banks are already behind the curve on industry digitalization. It’s no secret that these capital-tight institutions don’t have the billion-dollar budgets of Bank of America and JPMorgan to invest in new technology, specialized stablecoin-friendly infrastructure, and in-house experimentation. That then leaves the question: how can these banks offer customers access to the stablecoin market, quickly, cost-effectively, and before the Big Four captures the bulk of consumer demand?

My answer is to partner with agile, frontline crypto startups. There are hundreds of cryptocurrency payment startups operating across the U.S. that can help regional banks bridge the digital gap. Equally, by leveraging startups’ tech-forward infrastructure, regional banks can skip costly in-house experimentation to meet consumer demand more efficiently.

Advertisement

On a larger scale, this way of thinking has already proven successful. JPMorgan, Standard Chartered, and others have partnerships with a variety of small- to large-cap crypto businesses, including Coinbase, Circle, and the startup Digital Asset. Non-traditional institutions, too, like Stripe, followed this route last year — acquiring the stablecoin orchestration platform Bridge to expand their offerings. It’s already tried and tested, which is why regional banks must also follow suit if they want a share of the spoils.

Of course, I’m not blind to the risks. The stablecoin market has a checkered past that carries significant reputational challenges, and regional banks are right to be cautious. Investors lost $40bn when TerraUSD crashed in 2022, and I have no doubt that weighs on executives’ minds.

But that was four years ago. Crypto — and indeed, stablecoins — are no longer the Wild West of financial services. In fact, with the GENIUS Act clarifying regulatory frameworks and strengthening anti-money laundering protections, stablecoins have become rapidly more mainstream in the global payments landscape for institutions and consumers alike.

Rather, concerns about the risks stablecoins pose are precisely why these partnerships are so critical. Regional banks, by working with regulated startups that already have technical frameworks, will be able to mitigate risk and avoid the costly mistakes that could come with building untested systems in-house.

Advertisement

The bigger danger facing regional banks is inaction. The four biggest U.S. banks currently command over half the industry’s total profits — and their dominance will only grow as they sweep up payments revenues. As regulation matures and larger banks lock in early market share, regional banks face a narrowing window of opportunity to capitalize on consumer demand.

Given that these larger institutions are unlikely to want to dilute their potential share of stablecoin revenues across thousands of competitors, the race to meet consumer demand is well and truly underway. If regional banks wait, they will gift industry titans yet another competitive edge, one that they just cannot afford to lose.

Adam Turmakhan

Advertisement

Adam Turmakhan

Adam Turmakhan is the CEO of TurmaFinTech, a Florida-based fintech startup that offers bespoke customer data platforms for community banks and credit unions across the U.S.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Crypto selloff deepens with $400 million liquidations and rising short interest

Published

on

Crypto selloff deepens with $400 million liquidations and rising short interest

Bitcoin gave back a large portion of its recent gains on Thursday, now trading at $66,700 having lost 2.4% of its value since midnight UTC.

Ether (ETH) performed even worse, tumbling by 4.4% as the broader crypto market struggles to deal with continued risk-off sentiment.

The latest plunge was spurred by U.S. president Donald Trump, who said on Wednesday evening that the war in Iran would continue with extensive strikes on Iran.

“Over the next two to three weeks, we’re going to bring them back to the stone ages where they belong,” he said.

Advertisement

The comments led to an immediate spike in oil prices, with brent crude rising by around 10% to $108 per barrel as U.S. equities diverged.

Nasdaq 100 and S&P 500 futures lost 1.5% and 1.1% respectively while the U.S. dollar increased by 0.5% to above 100 points.

Derivatives positioning

  • BTC’s price has dropped over 2% since midnight UTC hours alongside a slightly uptick in open interest in major USD- and USDT-denominated futures. Plus, perpetual funding rates have dropped to their most negative since March 12. This combination suggests that traders are bearish and shorting the falling market.
  • In ether’s case, funding rates are most negative since October last year, a sign of strong bias for bearish bets. Meanwhile, bearishness in solana (SOL) is surprisingly more measured despite the overnight hack.
  • Privacy-focused zcash (ZEC) and have seen a notable decline in open interest (OI) in 24 hours, a sign of capital outflows.
  • Nearly $400 million in futures positions have been liquidated due to margin shortfalls. That’s a 17% increase in losses compared to the previous day.
  • Despite renewed risk-off tone, bitcoin and ether’s 30-day implied volatility indices remain flat in recent ranges. It points to orderly selling in the spot market rather than panic.
  • There is little scope for panic because traders are already positioned for market swoon. They have been consistently chasing bitcoin and ether put options (downside hedges) since the start of the year. As of writing, bitcoin and ether puts remained pricier than calls across all tenors on Deribit.
  • Block flows featured demand for ether straddles, a volatility strategy, and put spreads and bitcoin call spreads.

Token talk

  • The worst performing benchmark on Thursday was CoinDesk’s DeFi Select Index (DFX), which lost 5.9% since midnight UTC, closely followed by the CoinDesk Computing Select Index (CPUS) that tumbled by 5%.
  • Ethena (ENA) led the downside move as it fell by more than 10% on Thursday, there was also a heavy drawdown among DeFi tokens UNI, LDO, SKY and AAVE – all shedding between 4.2% and 6.5% during Asian and European hours on Thursday.
  • Algorand (ALGO) bucked the bearish market trend, rising by around 0.8% on Thursday as it continues its rich vein of form having rallied by 22% in the past week.
  • CoinMarketCap’s “altcoin season” index is down from 50/100 to 42/100 since March 30, highlighting relative weakness across the sector.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

CLARITY Act Nearing Senate Markup, Floor Vote

Published

on

CLARITY Act Nearing Senate Markup, Floor Vote

Coinbase chief legal officer Paul Grewal said the US Digital Asset Market Clarity Act is “moving toward” a markup hearing in the US Senate Banking Committee and could eventually move to a floor vote if senators resolve the stablecoin yield dispute and schedule a markup.

Speaking in a Wednesday interview on Fox Business, Grewal said lawmakers are nearing agreement on core elements of the crypto market structure bill, even as debate continues over stablecoin yield. “I think we’re very close to a deal,” he said.

The remarks point to possible movement on one of the last major sticking points in Senate talks over crypto market structure legislation: whether stablecoin issuers or platforms should be allowed to offer yield or similar rewards. The dispute has helped delay a Senate Banking Committee markup, leaving the broader effort to set federal rules for digital asset oversight still unresolved.

US banks have pushed for restrictions, arguing that such incentives could draw deposits away from traditional institutions and disrupt the banking system. Grewal pushed back on that claim, saying there is no evidence to support fears of deposit flight.

Advertisement

The US House of Representatives passed the CLARITY Act on July 17, 2025. In January, Senate Banking Committee Chair Tim Scott delayed a planned markup, which has yet to be rescheduled.

Related: Crypto investor sentiment will rise once CLARITY Act is passed: Bessent

Trump blames banks for stalling crypto bill

Last month, US President Donald Trump accused banks of undermining efforts to pass crypto market structure legislation, saying they are blocking progress over disagreements on stablecoin yield payments. “The Banks should not be trying to undercut The Genius Act, or hold The Clarity Act hostage,” he wrote.

It was later reported that Trump met privately with Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong just hours before issuing the statement.

Advertisement
Coinbase shares are down 23% YTD. Source: Yahoo! Finance

In January, Armstrong said Coinbase could not back the market structure bill “as written,” pointing to draft amendments that would eliminate stablecoin rewards and let banks restrict competition.

Related: CLARITY Act 2026 odds ‘extremely low’ if not passed before April: Exec

CLARITY delay could expose crypto to crackdowns

Last week, Coin Center executive director Peter Van Valkenburgh warned that failure to pass the CLARITY Act could leave the crypto industry vulnerable to a future US administration taking a tougher stance. He argued that rejecting developer protections in favor of short-term business interests risks creating a system shaped by political shifts rather than clear law.

“The point of passing CLARITY is not to trust this administration. It is to bind the next one,” he said.

Magazine: Bitcoin may take 7 years to upgrade to post-quantum — BIP-360 co-author

Advertisement