Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

Solana, Ethereum L2s (and XRP?) Just Got a Huge Buy Signal From Citrini Research

Published

on

Solana, Ethereum L2s (and XRP?) Just Got a Huge Buy Signal From Citrini Research

Everyone is talking about the Citrini Research report that sent the market into a tailspin yesterday. Buried in its 7,000 words of wisdom is a huge buy signal for Solana and Ethereum Layer 2s.

The report, entitled The 2028 Global Intelligence Crisis, is a work of fiction that explores a future scenario in which AI disruption leads to what it describes as a “negative feedback loop with no natural brake”.

In short, AI is going to displace white collar workers at an unprecedented rate. It should have been obvious, but we waited until 2028 for the penny to drop…

Advertisement

“It should have been clear all along that a single GPU cluster in North Dakota generating the output previously attributed to 10,000 white-collar workers in midtown Manhattan is more economic pandemic than economic panacea. The velocity of money flatlined. The human-centric consumer economy, 70% of GDP at the time, withered. We probably could have figured this out sooner if we just asked how much money machines spend on discretionary goods. (Hint: it’s zero.)

“AI capabilities improved, companies needed fewer workers, white collar layoffs increased, displaced workers spent less, margin pressure pushed firms to invest more in AI, AI capabilities improved…”

Here’s what that looks like schematically:

Entering an age of abundant intelligence

There is no self-correction as we would expect to see in a typical cyclical recession.

It goes something like this: construction (or other economic activity) slows, rates adjust downwards, allowing businesses to return to expanding output, until overproduction kicks in again, and so on.

Advertisement

In the AI doom loop, AI improves, fewer workers are needed, fewer workers mean less spending, the economy weakens, companies invest in more AI to protect margins, AI gets even better, and the cycle repeats – there is no natural break.

We thought it was a sectoral story. I’m not in Software-as-a-Service (SaaS), so there’s no need to worry. But it is more than software. Much more. It was a comforting notion that AI would usher in an era of creative destruction, as seen in past technological assaults on the old ways of doing things.

Yes, AI will destroy jobs, but, as in the past, new jobs and hitherto unimagined industries would emerge to replace them.

Trouble is, according to Citrini’s scenario, AI is a story of human intelligence displacement. The entire white collar workforce is imperilled. It is the consequence of abundant intelligence.

Advertisement

The authors of the Cetrini report remind us that advanced economies like the US are service-based. The report breaks that down so everyone can understand:

“The US economy is a white-collar services economy. White-collar workers represented 50% of employment and drove roughly 75% of discretionary consumer spending. The businesses and jobs that AI was chewing up were not tangential to the US economy, they were the US economy.”

Unfortunately for all of us – white collar, blue collar, whatever – machines don’t buy stuff.

AI agents destroy intermediation – bye bye credit cards, hello stablecoins

The report makes a robust case for how consumer agents will end the age of intermediation.

Advertisement

AI agents operate autonomously on behalf of their human owners, which means they can find the best flight or hotel on the market with ease because they never get tired, don’t find anything monotonous or dull, and never sleep.

The days of companies relying on our laziness or inertia are numbered. Add ‘vibe coding’ to the mix, and a new wave of startups can spin up delivery services apps in a few weeks to compete with DoorDash et al, or automate workflow in a bespoke way that fits your corporate needs more performantly than say Monday. Everywhere, fees are being compressed to near zero.

And then we come to our friends, the banks. Why pay fees to Mastercard and Amex when you can use a stablecoin running on a low-fee blockchain like Solana, or an Ethereum Layer 2 like Base, Arbitrum, Optimism, or Polygon?

Advertisement

“Once agents controlled the transaction, they went looking for bigger paperclips.

“There was only so much price-matching and aggregating to do. The biggest way to repeatedly save the user money (especially when agents started transacting among themselves) was to eliminate fees. In machine-to-machine commerce, the 2-3% card interchange rate became an obvious target.

“Agents went looking for faster and cheaper options than cards. Most settled on using stablecoins via Solana or Ethereum L2s, where settlement was near-instant and the transaction cost was measured in fractions of a penny.”

And what agentic AI will do for stablecoins could also be applied to cross-border payment protocols like Ripple’s XRP Ledger, although it doesn’t get a mention in this report.

Coinbase has already begun experimenting with a protocol that allows AI agents to make payments on-chain.

Advertisement

The tokenization, disintermediation, agentic AI narrative to beat the bear market blues

Crypto has been looking for a “new” narrative to lift the fog of the bear market. Well, it’s been hiding in plain sight: tokenization, disintermediation, and Agentic AI.

Will that solve the problem of an economy without enough workers getting paid wages and salaries to drive the consumption that companies depend on?

Probably not, but as the report contends, we’ve got time to figure out a solution for that. Taxing the hyperscaler ‘robber barons’ is suggested, but that’s unlikely to go down well with the Lords of the data centers.

Advertisement

In payments, as elsewhere, disruption is coming and everyone – investors, companies, and consumers – needs to start thinking about what it all means.

Consumer behavior is already shifting. Chargebacks911, a global leader in dispute resolution and chargeback prevention, is warning merchants and payments firms that agentic commerce will reshape disputes, as AI systems move from recommending purchases to executing them. Chargebacks are payment reversals initiated by a cardholder’s bank.

For years, most chargebacks fell into three categories: fraud, merchant error, or buyer’s remorse. Agent-initiated transactions create a fourth scenario. The purchase is technically authorised, but the result does not match the customer’s expectations.

“The payments industry has always treated the click as the signal of intent,” says Monica Eaton, founder and CEO of Chargebacks911.

Advertisement

“Agentic commerce removes the click. So now we need a new way to prove intent when a human was not directly involved.”

Keep an eye on your bank account, and welcome to the future.

Report co-author Alap Shah, explains more about the ideas in the report, such as AI-induced ‘ghost GDP’, where value accrues on the balance sheets of the hyperscalers but does not show up in the “human-centric consumer economy”:

The post Solana, Ethereum L2s (and XRP?) Just Got a Huge Buy Signal From Citrini Research appeared first on Cryptonews.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Argentina Blocks Polymarket as Crackdown on Prediction Markets Expands

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

Court Orders Remedial Reflex

In Buenos Aires, a court directed regulators to impose tight controls of access. The telecom regulator ENACOM also liaised with the internet companies to shut down the site. Google and Apple were also asked to take the app out of their stores. The reason why these actions are taken is to restrict access to the users in the country.

This has caused regulators to tighten their belts due to apprehension caused by activity associated with inflation data. It was reported that the platform made predictions of Argentina’s inflation rate in February before it was officially released. Besides, authorities reported that the prediction was altered minutes before publishing. This chain of events triggered the need to further research how the platform functions.

Researchers came to the conclusion that the platform served as a web-based betting platform. Regulators also said it enabled the users to participate in wagering without licenses. Also regulators were worried about access by minors. These results resulted in even tougher steps to be taken against the platform.

Latin America’s Crackdown Continues

The move is in line with other actions taken by Colombia. Polymarket was later blocked in the country due to similar complaints raised against unlicensed gambling services. Therefore, Argentina became the second country to ban the platform in the region. Such a trend underscores the developing regional integration in the area of regulatory enforcement.

Advertisement

Regulatory examination does not just end at Latin America; it extends to other markets. It has been reported that websites like Kalshi have been involved in court cases in the United States due to allegations of unregulated betting services. It has also been reported that unpaid wagers have been involved in cases of dispute that are associated with geopolitical activities. Regulators and legal authorities have paid more attention to such developments.

Polymarket has also addressed criticism by eliminating some of the markets. Additionally, the site has recently shut down a market for nuclear risk forecasts after being pressured by the publicity. More so, the shutdown was done through the high geopolitical tensions. This is in response to efforts to deal with concerns as the regulatory pressure persists. Argentina has imposed a nationwide ban on Polymarket following the discovery of unlicensed betting operations and a ban on platforms. The relocation is in line with the larger international desire to control prediction market sites and restrict illegal gambling solutions.

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

US Lawmakers Introduce Bill to Crack Down on Prediction Markets War Bets

Published

on

Law, Congress, United States, Prediction Markets

Two Democratic lawmakers in the US Congress have introduced legislation in response to “government corruption” over bets on prediction markets platforms.

In a Tuesday announcement, Texas Representative Greg Casar and Connecticut Senator Chris Murphy said they had introduced the Banning Event Trading on Sensitive Operations and ​Federal Functions (BETS OFF) Act after several Polymarket accounts made “highly unusual bets” that a war between the US and Israel against Iran would begin.

Murphy said on March 4 that it was likely that people with “inside information” of US President Donald Trump’s plan to bomb Iran had made the bets.

“We shouldn’t live in a country where someone sitting in the situation room making decisions about whether to invade or to bomb, decisions about war and peace, life and death, that those decisions could be driven by the fact that they have hundreds of thousands of dollars riding on the decision,” said Casar.

Advertisement
Law, Congress, United States, Prediction Markets
Source: Representative Greg Casar

The bill is the latest twist in US lawmakers’ efforts to crack down on prediction market platforms and accounts allegedly using insider information to profit from government actions. Last week, California Senator Adam Schiff introduced the DEATH BETS Act to prevent prediction markets platforms from listing events contracts related to war, terrorism, assassination and individual deaths.

Related: Arizona AG files charges against Kalshi over ‘illegal gambling‘

Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi offer bets on a variety of outcomes, including sporting events and US politics. However, users betting on the specifics of the US-Israel conflict with Iran have ignited controversy in many areas of government. On Monday, a military correspondent with the Times of Israel said that he had received death threats over his report of the date when an Iranian missile had struck Israel, all “in order to resolve a prediction on Polymarket.”

War-related bets still live on Polymarket

As of Tuesday, Polymarket still offered users the opportunity to place bets on the outcomes of several potential decisions in the US-Israel conflict against Iran, including on whether the US would send ground forces into the country, when a ceasefire might happen, and changes to Iranian leadership.

“The promise of prediction markets is to harness the wisdom of the crowd to create accurate, unbiased forecasts for the most important events to society,” said Polymarket in a note on Middle East markets. “That ability is particularly invaluable in gut-wrenching times like today. After discussing with those directly affected by the attacks, who had dozens of questions, we realized that prediction markets could give them the answers they needed in ways TV news and [X, formerly Twitter] could not.”

Advertisement

Kalshi, in contrast, offered event contracts related to the Iranian conflict but not on specific military actions, such as if the country might reach a nuclear deal with the US and whether Trump or other elected officials might visit Iran.

Magazine: Would Bitcoin really be at $200K if not for Jane Street? Trade Secrets